[vchkpw] Re: ps
Hello Raboo, On Sunday, October 13, 2002 at 1:55:19 PM you wrote: why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ??? So that it can HUP qmail? Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? 1.) vpopmail ain't a process running at your system. 2.) What PID file qmail leaves vadddomain and vdeldomain could rely on? Cause when I chroot my qmail it doesn't have ps, nor does it have /proc You qmail don't need the 'ps'. vadddomain and vdeldomain need the 'ps' which both need not to be run form within chroot. If you _really need_ to run them both from within _same_ chroot() as qmail make qmail put it's PID while starting up into a file, write a script or small program called 'ps' that is accessible in chroot() of qmail and reads the file (your) qmail creates. Ain't that hard to do if you have special requirements on a special system setup. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vchkpw] question about directory permissions
Hi all, Got what may be a silly question, but I have read the doccos etc, and havent found a specific answer to this one. The file permissions on the ~vpopmail directory structure all map out to basically only the user vpopmail can access it (well and root of course), now, to do some things involving getmail and maildrop I need to be able to write to those directory structures without being able to set the process owner as vpopmail, although I CAN set group to vchkpw - actually need to write various files to the virtual users directories, but same sort of deal, if the group cant list, it cant find...:). I was wondering what the effect would be on vpopmail operations if list rights were granted to the group (vchkpw) only to the domain tree, so that an external proecss can get to some of the specific files inside the users Maildir directory structures? (I dont want to just do this and perhaps break a running server, so I thought I would ask first) Thanks for the time Regards David Cook
[vchkpw] Vpopbull problem
Hi, I'm using vpopmail 5.2.1 with mysql authentication, to add a user to a domain I simply add a record to the DB and vpopmail will create the user directory as soon as they login or they receive a message. If I use vpopbull to send a mail to every user of the domain, the users who have never logged in or nevere received a mail won't receive the vpopbull mail, probably because the don't have yet their own Maildir Am I right or I have to look for the problem somewhere else ? Regards Edoardo Serra
Re: [vchkpw] Check Space Usage
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 08:43 PM, Justin R. Miller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Matt Simerson on Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:30:55PM -0400: Otherwise, Doug's heading down the right path. Write yourself a script that loops for each domain, and then each user within the domain, and go through and start counting up the bits. You'll likely have issues with depending on the maildirquota file so make sure that if that file doesn't exist, you fall back to a more expensive but accurate method like du. Is there an efficient way to do this if you _don't_ use quotas, ideally something other than 'du'? Efficient is a relative term. If you're asking if there's a way to do this that's nearly as efficient as using file system quotas, then the answer is an easy no. The reason quotas are so efficient is that the kernel is involved, keeping track of disk operations on a per user basis. It always has a real time idea of how much disk space is in use by a customer. There is no other highly efficient way of doing it. The next best utility (based on my personal experience, the extensive reading I've done, and advise of peers) for such a task is du or ls, both if which suffer from varying degrees of inefficiency. I haven't ever compared the speed of using du/ls to using perls File::* utilities. If using file system quota's isn't an option, experimenting with all three could be a fruitful endeavor, the results of which I'd find interesting. Matt
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopbull problem
I think vpopbull uses the vauth_getall() function. This function should return an entry for every user in the system. For cdb it uses the vpasswd.cdb file for mysql it uses the entries in the tables. For each user returned, it will use the directory entry for their Maildir location. If the Maildir doesn't yet exist it won't be able to write the file. vpopbull doesn't automatically create Maildir directories for users that have not had a directory assigned to them. Ken Jones On Monday 14 October 2002 03:28 am, Edoardo Serra wrote: Hi, I'm using vpopmail 5.2.1 with mysql authentication, to add a user to a domain I simply add a record to the DB and vpopmail will create the user directory as soon as they login or they receive a message. If I use vpopbull to send a mail to every user of the domain, the users who have never logged in or nevere received a mail won't receive the vpopbull mail, probably because the don't have yet their own Maildir Am I right or I have to look for the problem somewhere else ? Regards Edoardo Serra
Re: [vchkpw] vconvert problem - ignoring one user
The - in the domain name should not matter. I would suggest running vconvert in gdb and walk through the how it processes that one domain. Then you can see what is going on. Hope that helps Ken Jones On Sunday 13 October 2002 10:42 pm, Jesse Reynolds wrote: Hi I'm having a problem running vconvert -c -m to convert our installation from CDB files to MySQL. Out of 243 users accross 61 domain names only one user is not imported. The domain name has a hyphin in it (-) - would this cause the problem perhaps? There is only one user in this domain. The domain got imported, just not the user. We are running on the new server (MySQL): vpopmail 5.3.8 mysql 3.23.49 freebsd 4.6.2 On the old server (CDB): vpopmail 5.2.1 freebsd 4.2 Thankyou Jesse
Re: [vchkpw] vqsignup+send_welcome.c
On Sunday 13 October 2002 09:59 pm, sean xu wrote: Hi the vqsignup 0.5 have a file send_welcome.c ... the line snprintf(b, 255, %s/etc/welcome/%s, VPOPMAILDIR, domain); You can expland this line into (for a default setup) /home/vpopmail/etc/welcome/domain name. So if you create a welcome directory under your vpopmail etc directory, then welcome message email in a file with the name of the domain, then vqregister would probably see it. Ken Jones is supposing send a welcome message to the new user sign up ? where does the welcome reside ? in /usr/home/vpopmail/etc thanks sean __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos More http://faith.yahoo.com
[vchkpw] Backup Accounts
Hi all, I have qmail, vpopmail, qmaildmin and sqwebmail installed. Does anyone know which files to backup in order to have a complete e-mail account backup? I need to move all the accounts and their data to a new machine and I don't want to lose all the data and I really don't want do create all accounts again (200 accounts, 40 alias). Thanks in advance André Rivotti Casimiro
Re: [vchkpw] Re: ps
Yes I meant to say my Qmail package (including vpopmail) there must be a solution for runing qmail+friends in a jail patching qmail and vpopmail so it finds uses a PID file would be cool that is what i mean't sorry if I was unclear about that... - Original Message - From: Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:25 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Re: ps Hello Raboo, On Sunday, October 13, 2002 at 1:55:19 PM you wrote: why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ??? So that it can HUP qmail? Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? 1.) vpopmail ain't a process running at your system. 2.) What PID file qmail leaves vadddomain and vdeldomain could rely on? Cause when I chroot my qmail it doesn't have ps, nor does it have /proc You qmail don't need the 'ps'. vadddomain and vdeldomain need the 'ps' which both need not to be run form within chroot. If you _really need_ to run them both from within _same_ chroot() as qmail make qmail put it's PID while starting up into a file, write a script or small program called 'ps' that is accessible in chroot() of qmail and reads the file (your) qmail creates. Ain't that hard to do if you have special requirements on a special system setup. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] Re: ps
Hi Raboo, On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:07:36 +0200 Raboo Treed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I meant to say my Qmail package (including vpopmail) there must be a solution for runing qmail+friends in a jail patching qmail and vpopmail so it finds uses a PID file would be cool So put 'ps' and it's dependent libs in chroot-env, put 'mount' and it's dependent libs there too, do a mount -t proc proc /proc in chroot() environment and be happy about 'ps' working again. Or what problem did I miss? -- Peter
[vchkpw] Blackhole?
Has anyone here successfully implemented the Blackhole spam/virus blocking system using vpopmail? I've installed it on my personal server (which uses unix accounts) and it works fine. But on my vpopmail server, i'm running into an assortment of oddball problems. The support for the program is a mixed bag - the author wrote a great program, but he's weak on documentation (as he freely admits), and he doesn't have a lot of time to work on the program these days. I'm attracted to blackhole rather than spamassassin because it's written in C rather than perl, so there's lower overhead per delivery. http://www.groovy.org is the main site - i just this morning posted in the forum there, so rather than repeat the details of what i'm experiencing, you can check it out there. if anyone has any insights, i'd appreciate the assistance. Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://folding.stanford.edu The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net
Re: [vchkpw] Check Space Usage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Matt Simerson on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:11:31AM -0400: Is there an efficient way to do this if you _don't_ use quotas, ideally something other than 'du'? Efficient is a relative term. If you're asking if there's a way to do this that's nearly as efficient as using file system quotas, then the answer is an easy no. The reason quotas are so efficient is that the kernel is involved, keeping track of disk operations on a per user basis. It always has a real time idea of how much disk space is in use by a customer. There is no other highly efficient way of doing it. The next best utility (based on my personal experience, the extensive reading I've done, and advise of peers) for such a task is du or ls, both if which suffer from varying degrees of inefficiency. I haven't ever compared the speed of using du/ls to using perls File::* utilities. If using file system quota's isn't an option, experimenting with all three could be a fruitful endeavor, the results of which I'd find interesting. I meant vpopmail quotas, not filesystem quotas. How exactly could you sue fs quotas when everything is owned by vpopmail.vchkpw? - -- [!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9qxyb94d6K8nEDDERAh4aAKCUDsi/UsfIhq7FGe4wTJQbsT7mmACggLZ7 DlfJ2OC0BgyCW3CYotYK7jc= =QSgg -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [vchkpw] vpopmail bug?
I bumped this up to 25, to no avail. 166324 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = infou and pw_domain = stlgodhomes.com (login is info) Does anyone need anything from me, I can duplicate this all day long... Is anyone working to resolve this? The problem most likely is related to the MAXPERIP=4 setting. If you use this with webmail you have to increase this value. --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET -Original Message- From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail bug? Can anyone else reproduce this problem? What version of courier-imap are you using? The authlib/preauthvchkpw.c file is worth checking against the one on the inter7 page. Mysql Quits can be caused by a program not calling mysql_close before exiting. Which in of itself would not cause an authentication failure. It's worth double checking your courier-imap configuration file. The one that specifies max client connections. The vpopmail ChangeLog shows the change to the email parser function and also reports that it fixed all known problems. To really track down the problem, lots of debugging output is needed to isolate what is ocurring. Hopefully leading to a solution :) Ken Jones On Friday 20 September 2002 04:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I upgraded to 5.3.8 - and am still seeing this behavior. *sigh* Is this limited to Courier? Quoting Dzuy Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a bug in vpopmail's email parser function which adds extra character to the end of user login at times, when called by courier. Version 5.3.x has a newer email parser which seems to work. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am seeing strange behaviour on my Qmail+VpopMail(w/ MySQL)+COurier setup. Authenticating via IMAP works 90% of the time, but doesn't for 10%. I don't seem to be able to find any pattern as to it not working - it doesn't consistently fail in any particular manner. The problem happens with multiple mail clients. This might be a courier related issue, if so, then please tell me. Here is what I see in the mysql logs, when I try to log in to an account with a login of doug (actually, it this using a webmail client, so the login is [EMAIL PROTECTED]): 540747 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = doug and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 540747 Quit 020915 4:36:10 540748 Connect qmail@localhost on vpopmail 540748 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = doug and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com ..all looks good. I show failed logins like this: 020917 12:56:28 590250 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougs and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 590250 Quit 020917 12:56:33 590251 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougs and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 590251 Quit 020917 12:56:38 590252 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougs and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 590252 Quit 020917 12:57:03 590253 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougs and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 590253 Quit -or-020917 13:20:01 590609 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougu and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 590609 Quit 020917 13:20:06 590641 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougu and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com 590641 Quit -or- 020916 10:09:48 564000 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos, pw_dir, pw_shell from vpopmail where pw_name = dougt and pw_domain = innerworldscuba.com
RE: [vchkpw] Backup Accounts
This has been discussed countless times before. Please see http://bluedot.net/mail/archive/list.php?f=2 to search the archives. -Clayton -Original Message- From: André Rivotti Casimiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Backup Accounts Hi all, I have qmail, vpopmail, qmaildmin and sqwebmail installed. Does anyone know which files to backup in order to have a complete e-mail account backup? I need to move all the accounts and their data to a new machine and I don't want to lose all the data and I really don't want do create all accounts again (200 accounts, 40 alias). Thanks in advance André Rivotti Casimiro
RE: [vchkpw] Blackhole?
I tried to get blackhole running, but it was tough without the docs. I originally decided not to go with SA because it's written in perl, but it can be run as a daemon and there's a client written in C that actually is pretty quick. I gave up on blackhole though.. I wasn't able to get it to work, but I was also pressed for time so I didn't have too much luxury to screw around with it all that much either. -Clayton -Original Message- From: Paul Theodoropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Blackhole? Has anyone here successfully implemented the Blackhole spam/virus blocking system using vpopmail? I've installed it on my personal server (which uses unix accounts) and it works fine. But on my vpopmail server, i'm running into an assortment of oddball problems. The support for the program is a mixed bag - the author wrote a great program, but he's weak on documentation (as he freely admits), and he doesn't have a lot of time to work on the program these days. I'm attracted to blackhole rather than spamassassin because it's written in C rather than perl, so there's lower overhead per delivery. http://www.groovy.org is the main site - i just this morning posted in the forum there, so rather than repeat the details of what i'm experiencing, you can check it out there. if anyone has any insights, i'd appreciate the assistance. Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://folding.stanford.edu The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net
[vchkpw] alias support via vpopmail in PHP
Hi all, We have moved to qmail / vpopmail completely and it's working very well for our needs. We run a control panel written (in-house) in php which used to take care of adding / deleting users before we had moved to vpopmail. The new mail server however works in a jailed freebsd environment and does not offer direct access to commands, and in our limited environment, we don't want to offer qmailadmin to our clients. I decided a good way to link our control panel to the new mail server using php's internal vpopmail functions would be via an xml gateway. One sends authenticated internal posts (via ssl) to the this gateway -- the gateway is running as vpopmail and carries out the requests. The response is sent back to our control panel as an xml document. This solves many issues and offers great flexibility. I finished implementing the code yesterday and it's all working well. Enough with the background, on with the problem. The valias function is not support by php as the functionality is left out of vpopmail itself (please correct me if I am wrong), and I the way around this, as far as I can figure out, is writing a .qmail-user file in the domains/domainname.com directory with the | vdelivermail line for the new email address. As the (xml) server is running as vpopmail, this is hardly a problem to do -- however, I was curious if this would be the most sound method. What do you guys think? Am I overlooking something very obvious or is writing a file manually a good solution? I appreciate your comments. Best regards, Mustafa. -- If I knew I'd live this long, I'd take better care of myself.
Re: [vchkpw] alias support via vpopmail in PHP
well as my friend largo nicely put it 01:13 Iargo --enable-valias=y hehe ;) - Original Message - From: Mustafa Hashmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:40 PM Subject: [vchkpw] alias support via vpopmail in PHP Hi all, We have moved to qmail / vpopmail completely and it's working very well for our needs. We run a control panel written (in-house) in php which used to take care of adding / deleting users before we had moved to vpopmail. The new mail server however works in a jailed freebsd environment and does not offer direct access to commands, and in our limited environment, we don't want to offer qmailadmin to our clients. I decided a good way to link our control panel to the new mail server using php's internal vpopmail functions would be via an xml gateway. One sends authenticated internal posts (via ssl) to the this gateway -- the gateway is running as vpopmail and carries out the requests. The response is sent back to our control panel as an xml document. This solves many issues and offers great flexibility. I finished implementing the code yesterday and it's all working well. Enough with the background, on with the problem. The valias function is not support by php as the functionality is left out of vpopmail itself (please correct me if I am wrong), and I the way around this, as far as I can figure out, is writing a .qmail-user file in the domains/domainname.com directory with the | vdelivermail line for the new email address. As the (xml) server is running as vpopmail, this is hardly a problem to do -- however, I was curious if this would be the most sound method. What do you guys think? Am I overlooking something very obvious or is writing a file manually a good solution? I appreciate your comments. Best regards, Mustafa. -- If I knew I'd live this long, I'd take better care of myself.
[vchkpw] Vpopmail under devel any longer?
We haven't seen anything from the authors for quite some time on any bugs being fixed or things being worked on. Heck the last development update was July 16th. And the last stable release was back in May. I see updates with the EPS system. Is this all that is being worked on now? --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail under devel any longer?
At 17:44 14/10/2002 -0700, Brad Dameron wrote: Well, there was a pre-development post of a link to Vpopmail 5.3.9 in September, though I found that rather perplexing for obvious reasons. That said, I to am finding the lack of response disconcerting, though I do know Inter7 has been very busy lately.Perhaps we can provoke a response from them this time out, and if so ... .. maybe .. .. maybe .. convince them to set up a CVS so those of us who work on the code and actually see their results published! hint hint -- Steve We haven't seen anything from the authors for quite some time on any bugs being fixed or things being worked on. Heck the last development update was July 16th. And the last stable release was back in May. I see updates with the EPS system. Is this all that is being worked on now? --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail under devel any longer?
Steve Fulton wrote: post of a link to Vpopmail 5.3.9 Is anyone actually running it? I tried to but then reverted because of a couple issues. convince them to set up a CVS so those of us who work on the code and actually see their results published! hint hint I'm happy to setup a public repository on one of my machines in the short-term until inter7 frees up some time. I do not want to take over vpopmail development but I'm certainly able to offer CVS+webcvs+nightlies right now and if we think it's a good idea then lets go ahead and do that. When the good guys at inter7 want to start up development again then we'll just tar it up and move it back over there. On the other hand, maybe they're working on some new super-secret ultra-cool qmail add-on to replace all the tools we have now. (if anyone can, they can) -david ulevitch
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail under devel any longer?
At 22:08 14/10/2002 -0500, David U. wrote: post of a link to Vpopmail 5.3.9 Is anyone actually running it? I tried to but then reverted because of a couple issues. I am, though I'm curious about what problems you've discovered.. I'm happy to setup a public repository on one of my machines in the short-term until inter7 frees up some time. It would probably be useful, but I wouldn't want to create a seperate Vpopmail development branch from the current one. Who knows what's been added and what hasn't? Its probably better if a CVS is setup by Inter7 themselves and initially populated based on their up-to-date code. -- Steve
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail under devel any longer?
All our packages are under constant development. If you want the latest stable version, use version 5.3.8 from the development page (inter7.com/devel). It's planned to go stable. A new development version will take it's place with new patches, bug fixes, etc. Remember, our packages are GPL, and we are not paid for their development, so we cannot guarantee updates, or bug fixes in any scheduled manner. However, if a particular problem you're having needs to be addressed, and is important to your business, please contact us. Steve Fulton wrote: At 22:08 14/10/2002 -0500, David U. wrote: post of a link to Vpopmail 5.3.9 Is anyone actually running it? I tried to but then reverted because of a couple issues. I am, though I'm curious about what problems you've discovered.. I'm happy to setup a public repository on one of my machines in the short-term until inter7 frees up some time. It would probably be useful, but I wouldn't want to create a seperate Vpopmail development branch from the current one. Who knows what's been added and what hasn't? Its probably better if a CVS is setup by Inter7 themselves and initially populated based on their up-to-date code. -- Steve -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Brookings - Chief Technical Officer Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470 Prices at http://www.inter7.com/prices
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail under devel any longer?
Steve Fulton wrote: At 22:08 14/10/2002 -0500, David U. wrote: post of a link to Vpopmail 5.3.9 Is anyone actually running it? I tried to but then reverted because of a couple issues. I am, though I'm curious about what problems you've discovered.. The most annoying one being the qmail-extension not working. I'm happy to setup a public repository on one of my machines in the short-term until inter7 frees up some time. It would probably be useful, but I wouldn't want to create a seperate Vpopmail development branch from the current one. Who knows what's been added and what hasn't? Its probably better if a CVS is setup by Inter7 themselves and initially populated based on their up-to-date code. Well from the post Vol just made it seems like they are developing and so the need isn't even there. I agree with what you say though, and if it ever becomes an issue we can discuss it then. It seems like inter7 is still rockin' the code like usual so I'm (obviously) happy. -davidu
[vchkpw] Strange Problems with Relay Table in vpopmail/mysql
Hi list, I've scoured the archives over and over again, and I simply can't find an answer to my problem... I've installed vpopmail with --enable-mysql=y and --enable-roaming-users=y, among other option. I've patched tcpserver with Matt Simerson's patch. I'm running tcpserver from my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-stmpd/run script with the -S option to have it use the MySQL database for looking up IP addresses to allow relaying. Here's the problem! When I log into the POP server, there are absolutely NO changes made to the relay table of the vpopmail database. I'm at a complete loss here, as there are absolutely no error messages given. I know that vpopmail works fine with the database for other functions, as I can add new users, and authenticate to the POP server without any problems. But...the relay table never gets updated. As a side note, the lastauth table doesn't reflect the IP address I'm POPping in from...it just shows a blank field for users who have logged in, and 0.0.0.0 for all other users. Does anyone have any suggestions for where to start? Thanks in advance! Jeff Butts
Re: [vchkpw] Strange Problems with Relay Table in vpopmail/mysql
Hello, At Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2002 07:36, Jeff Butts wrote: When I log into the POP server, there are absolutely NO changes made to the relay table of the vpopmail database. I'm at a complete loss here, as there are absolutely no error messages given. I know that vpopmail works fine with the database for other functions, as I can add new users, and authenticate to the POP server without any problems. But...the relay table never gets updated. which version are you running? I was faceing this problem with version 5.2 as well. I'm currently running 5.3.6 witch works very well with smtpAuth and the roaming users option as well as with Matts tcpserver patch. I don't know how the recent version works, but I will give it a try within the next days. Regards Hans-Juergen
