[vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
It doesn't matter how good your password is if you're using plaintext connections :) Since every MUA I've used i nthe last few years supports SSL or TLS I should really get around to deprecating pop3 and imap and only using pop3s and imaps. This is especially imporant since some govts are trying to push through laws forcing ISP's to store all of the data each of their users downloads meaning that your unencrypted data will remain stored for however long is legislated with access by who knows how many people. \Clay On 2014-03-05 07:57, Tom Collins wrote: The submission entries outside the US could very well be from hacked accounts. I'm finding a surprising number of compromised accounts (once a week?), including users with good passwords, so I have to assume they're snooped on public wireless, or their computers are compromised by malware of some sort. The vckpw-smtp entries from outside the US are probably also hacked accounts, since mail received from remote servers doesn't include authentication. Sorry I wasn't thinking clearly in my previous response -- I forgot these were vchkpw entries and are only related to authentication. I was thinking about qmail logs. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:43 PM, LHTek wrote: Thanks for the reply. NOTE: None of my users will have sent anything from outside the US. I've got some log entries for vchkpw-submission (marked as successful in the log) with non-US IP's (Russia, Egypt, Honk Kong, etc). In my analysis I'm marking those entries as hacked accounts. From what I read from your response, vchkpw-smtp (marked as successful in the log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25. That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly? - FROM: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com TO: vchkpw@inter7.com SENT: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM SUBJECT: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:53171ca934269165765629!
Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
I am using PLAIN text passwords I'm afraid. I will be changing that now though. I very tired of these password hacks. Since this will be a new process for me I have questions: In changing the server to require encrypted passwords, will I need to contact all my clients and have them change the way they connect? Or will their email clients just automate the change? From: c...@milos.co.za c...@milos.co.za To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp It doesn't matter how good your password is if you're using plaintext connections :) Since every MUA I've used i nthe last few years supports SSL or TLS I should really get around to deprecating pop3 and imap and only using pop3s and imaps. This is especially imporant since some govts are trying to push through laws forcing ISP's to store all of the data each of their users downloads meaning that your unencrypted data will remain stored for however long is legislated with access by who knows how many people. \\Clay On 2014-03-05 07:57, Tom Collins wrote: The submission entries outside the US could very well be from hacked accounts. I'm finding a surprising number of compromised accounts (once a week?), including users with good passwords, so I have to assume they're snooped on public wireless, or their computers are compromised by malware of some sort. The vckpw-smtp entries from outside the US are probably also hacked accounts, since mail received from remote servers doesn't include authentication. Sorry I wasn't thinking clearly in my previous response -- I forgot these were vchkpw entries and are only related to authentication. I was thinking about qmail logs. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:43 PM, LHTek wrote: Thanks for the reply. NOTE: None of my users will have sent anything from outside the US. I've got some log entries for vchkpw-submission (marked as successful in the log) with non-US IP's (Russia, Egypt, Honk Kong, etc).In my analysis I'm marking those entries as hacked accounts. From what I read from your response, vchkpw-smtp (marked as successful in the log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25. That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly? From: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:531743f234265098613353!
[vchkpw] Re: [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
PLAIN authentication is ok, provided that TLS has been activated by the client (presumably before credentials are sent) or SSL is in use (unconventional 465 port). In changing this, each client will need to be manually reconfigured. I'm not aware of any client that automatically adjusts to changes such as this. I'm not aware of a practical way to require encrypted passwords for qmail-smtpd (whether on port 25 or 587) at this point. Spamdyke has a recent feature allowing it to handle authentication, and I believe that Sam will be adding a setting to require encryption before authentication in the next release. When that's available, I'll be changing QMT to use spamdyke for authentication, which will (at last) allow for enforcement of this policy (no passwords sent in clear text). On the retrieval side of things, dovecot provides such a configuration parameter, #disable_plaintext_auth = yes, which is the default value. P.S. FWIW, I would have not expected to see (as many) unauthorized attempts on port 587. Spammers will eventually use this port though. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 03/05/2014 08:34 AM, LHTek wrote: I am using PLAIN text passwords I'm afraid. I will be changing that now though. I very tired of these password hacks. Since this will be a new process for me I have questions: In changing the server to require encrypted passwords, will I need to contact all my clients and have them change the way they connect? Or will their email clients just automate the change? *From:* c...@milos.co.za c...@milos.co.za *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com *Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM *Subject:* [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp It doesn't matter how good your password is if you're using plaintext connections :) Since every MUA I've used i nthe last few years supports SSL or TLS I should really get around to deprecating pop3 and imap and only using pop3s and imaps. This is especially imporant since some govts are trying to push through laws forcing ISP's to store all of the data each of their users downloads meaning that your unencrypted data will remain stored for however long is legislated with access by who knows how many people. \\Clay On 2014-03-05 07:57, Tom Collins wrote: The submission entries outside the US could very well be from hacked accounts. I'm finding a surprising number of compromised accounts (once a week?), including users with good passwords, so I have to assume they're snooped on public wireless, or their computers are compromised by malware of some sort. The vckpw-smtp entries from outside the US are probably also hacked accounts, since mail received from remote servers doesn't include authentication. Sorry I wasn't thinking clearly in my previous response -- I forgot these were vchkpw entries and are only related to authentication. I was thinking about qmail logs. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:43 PM, LHTek wrote: Thanks for the reply. NOTE: None of my users will have sent anything from outside the US. I've got some log entries for vchkpw-submission (marked as successful in the log) with non-US IP's (Russia, Egypt, Honk Kong, etc).In my analysis I'm marking those entries as hacked accounts. From what I read from your response, vchkpw-smtp (marked as successful in the log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25. That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly? *From:* Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com mailto:t...@tomlogic.com *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com *Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:531756ed34261630194476!
[vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:5316b90234262261610445!
[vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
Cher Client, Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible. Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y répondre. Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées. BNP Paribas Fortis SA T : +32(0)2 762 20 00 Montagne du Parc 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Bruxelles | www.bnpparibasfortis.be Geachte klant, Wij hebben uw e-mail goed ontvangen, waarvoor dank. Onze medewerkers zullen uw vraag zo snel mogelijk beantwoorden. Opgelet : dit is een automatisch bericht. Hierop kan u geen antwoord versturen. Met vriendelijke groeten, BNP Paribas Fortis NV T : +32(0)2 762 60 00 Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be Dear customer, We hereby acknowledge receipt of your e-mail. Thank you. Our staff will answer your query as soon as possible. Careful: This is an automatic message. Please do not reply. Yours sincerely, BNP Paribas Fortis SA/NV T : +32(0)2 261 11 11 Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussels | www.bnpparibasfortis.be Sehr geehrte Kundin, sehr geehrter Kunde, Wir danken Ihnen für Ihre E-Mail. Unsere Mitarbeiter werden Ihnen so schnell wie möglich antworten. Achtung: dies ist eine automatische Nachricht. Sie können sie folglich nicht beantworten. Freundliche Grüße BNP Paribas Fortis SA/NV T : +32(0)2 261 11 11 Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be - Original Message - From: LHTek dennywjo...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 9:41:18 PM GMT-08:00 Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 == BNP Paribas Fortis disclaimer: http://www.bnpparibasfortis.com/e-mail-disclaimer.html BNP Paribas Fortis privacy policy: http://www.bnpparibasfortis.com/privacy-policy.html == !DSPAM:5316ba7434262017919841!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:5316bde734268482773211!
[vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
Cher Client, Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible. Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y répondre. Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées. BNP Paribas Fortis SA T : +32(0)2 762 20 00 Montagne du Parc 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Bruxelles | www.bnpparibasfortis.be Geachte klant, Wij hebben uw e-mail goed ontvangen, waarvoor dank. Onze medewerkers zullen uw vraag zo snel mogelijk beantwoorden. Opgelet : dit is een automatisch bericht. Hierop kan u geen antwoord versturen. Met vriendelijke groeten, BNP Paribas Fortis NV T : +32(0)2 762 60 00 Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be Dear customer, We hereby acknowledge receipt of your e-mail. Thank you. Our staff will answer your query as soon as possible. Careful: This is an automatic message. Please do not reply. Yours sincerely, BNP Paribas Fortis SA/NV T : +32(0)2 261 11 11 Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussels | www.bnpparibasfortis.be Sehr geehrte Kundin, sehr geehrter Kunde, Wir danken Ihnen für Ihre E-Mail. Unsere Mitarbeiter werden Ihnen so schnell wie möglich antworten. Achtung: dies ist eine automatische Nachricht. Sie können sie folglich nicht beantworten. Freundliche Grüße BNP Paribas Fortis SA/NV T : +32(0)2 261 11 11 Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be - Original Message - From: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 10:02:12 PM GMT-08:00 Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 == BNP Paribas Fortis disclaimer: http://www.bnpparibasfortis.com/e-mail-disclaimer.html BNP Paribas Fortis privacy policy: http://www.bnpparibasfortis.com/privacy-policy.html == !DSPAM:5316be7c34261148094982!
[vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
Thanks for the reply. NOTE: None of my users will have sent anything from outside the US. I've got some log entries for vchkpw-submission (marked as successful in the log) with non-US IP's (Russia, Egypt, Honk Kong, etc).In my analysis I'm marking those entries as hacked accounts. From what I read from your response, vchkpw-smtp (marked as successful in the log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25. That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly? From: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:5316c7aa34265248780387!
[vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
The submission entries outside the US could very well be from hacked accounts. I'm finding a surprising number of compromised accounts (once a week?), including users with good passwords, so I have to assume they're snooped on public wireless, or their computers are compromised by malware of some sort. The vckpw-smtp entries from outside the US are probably also hacked accounts, since mail received from remote servers doesn't include authentication. Sorry I wasn't thinking clearly in my previous response -- I forgot these were vchkpw entries and are only related to authentication. I was thinking about qmail logs. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:43 PM, LHTek wrote: Thanks for the reply. NOTE: None of my users will have sent anything from outside the US. I've got some log entries for vchkpw-submission (marked as successful in the log) with non-US IP's (Russia, Egypt, Honk Kong, etc). In my analysis I'm marking those entries as hacked accounts. From what I read from your response, vchkpw-smtp (marked as successful in the log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25. That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly? From: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication. vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or by other servers delivering mail to your server. -Tom On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM, LHTek wrote: In the /var/log/maillog file what is the difference between these 2 entries (vchkpw-submission, vchkpw-smtp)? example: Mar 4 17:27:03 michael vpopmail[14701]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.185.3.238 Mar 4 10:54:42 michael vpopmail[29027]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success t...@domain.com:64.57.239.114 !DSPAM:5316cae034263249811152!
[vchkpw] qmail-inject closes pipe before vdelivermail has finished sending.
this causes a sigpipe error in vdelivermail, and gets feed back into qmail-inject as a signal 13 ( sigpipe ). The causes qmail-inject to think that the child ( vdelivermail ) crashed. the bad email file has this: Received: (qmail 3973 invoked by uid 508); 30 Jan 2013 21:11:26 - Received: from c-68-41-19-219.hsd1.mi.comcast.net (68.41.19.219) by mail.gatworks.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2013 21:11:26 - Received: from apache by anbid.com.br with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from interrupting...@anbid.com.br) id 87QGEX-U87LUI-QI for p...@gatworks.com Cc: qx...@gatworks.com; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:11:25 -0500 To: p...@gatworks.com Cc: qx...@gatworks.com Subject: Case #52932381 X-PHP-Script: anbid.com.br/sendmail.php for 68.41.19.219 From: Better Business Bureau colin.rol...@chicago.bbb.org X-Sender: Better Business Bureau colin.rol...@chicago.bbb.org X-Mailer: PHP X-Priority: 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; in the qmail log file: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/Cc:_qx...@gatworks.com;_Wed,_30_Jan_2013_16:11:25_-0500/Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/ Apparently qmail-inject stops processing the input file ( via pipe from vdelivermail:435 if ( write(write_fd, msgbuf, file_count) == -1 )) at the bogus line that cant be parsed any further. Once the pipe is closed by qmail-inject, any further writes will get a sig-pipe error, and the process ( vdelivermail ) will die, as the signal processing is set to default ( ie terminate process ). Somehow, qmail-inject has to process the rest of the file, even if there are parse errors, or vdelivermail has to recognize that a pipe can suddenly close up. !DSPAM:510ad44c34141883472779!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject closes pipe before vdelivermail has finished sending.
Just to be sure: that is qmail-local gets the signal 13 from vdelivermail. Vdelivermail has the pipe to qmail-inject broken when qmail-inject closes the pipe. 2460 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 supervise 19523 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 qmail-send 19525 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 qmail-lspawn 21047 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 qmail-local 21048 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 vdelivermail 21049 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 qmail-inject defunct On 01/31/13 17:25, Netbeans wrote: this causes a sigpipe error in vdelivermail, and gets feed back into qmail-inject as a signal 13 ( sigpipe ). The causes qmail-inject to think that the child ( vdelivermail ) crashed. the bad email file has this: Received: (qmail 3973 invoked by uid 508); 30 Jan 2013 21:11:26 - Received: from c-68-41-19-219.hsd1.mi.comcast.net (68.41.19.219) by mail.gatworks.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2013 21:11:26 - Received: from apache by anbid.com.br with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from interrupting...@anbid.com.br) id 87QGEX-U87LUI-QI for p...@gatworks.com Cc: qx...@gatworks.com; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:11:25 -0500 To: p...@gatworks.com Cc: qx...@gatworks.com Subject: Case #52932381 X-PHP-Script: anbid.com.br/sendmail.php for 68.41.19.219 From: Better Business Bureau colin.rol...@chicago.bbb.org X-Sender: Better Business Bureau colin.rol...@chicago.bbb.org X-Mailer: PHP X-Priority: 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; in the qmail log file: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/Cc:_qx...@gatworks.com;_Wed,_30_Jan_2013_16:11:25_-0500/Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/ Apparently qmail-inject stops processing the input file ( via pipe from vdelivermail:435 if ( write(write_fd, msgbuf, file_count) == -1 )) at the bogus line that cant be parsed any further. Once the pipe is closed by qmail-inject, any further writes will get a sig-pipe error, and the process ( vdelivermail ) will die, as the signal processing is set to default ( ie terminate process ). Somehow, qmail-inject has to process the rest of the file, even if there are parse errors, or vdelivermail has to recognize that a pipe can suddenly close up. !DSPAM:510ad56a34147370429629!
[vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi, On my Qmail 1.03 I can not simultaneously apply smtp-auth patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-0510) and chkuser (chkuser-2.0.8b-release or chkuser-2.0.9-release). It seems that there is a conflict between these two patches. you know a patch which includes 2 or a solution to the conflict ? Thanks! !DSPAM:4dc106a732719806668668!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi, I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and chkuser. I can put together a package with just smtp-auth and chkuser if you like.. Anyway you can do it by yourself applying chkuser over smtp-tls and following the directives of the author of chkuser http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/installation/manual.html best regards Roberto Puzzanghera On Wed, 4 May 2011 09:56:15 +0200, OVH wrote: Hi, On my Qmail 1.03 I can not simultaneously apply smtp-auth patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-0510) and chkuser (chkuser-2.0.8b-release or chkuser-2.0.9-release). It seems that there is a conflict between these two patches. you know a patch which includes 2 or a solution to the conflict ? Thanks! !DSPAM:4dc134e232712117818682!
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi, Thank you for your patch, but it shows errors, so if you have only the patch with smtp-auth and chkuser i like it. Thanks! patching file FILES Hunk #1 succeeded at 135 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 337 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 406 (offset -1 lines). patching file MakeArgs.c patching file Makefile patching file Makefile-cert.mk patching file TARGETS patching file alloc.c patching file auto-int.c patching file auto-int8.c patching file auto-str.c patching file base64.c patching file base64.h patching file byte.h patching file byte_cspn.c patching file byte_rcspn.c patching file case_startb.c patching file chkspawn.c patching file chkuser.c patching file chkuser.h patching file chkuser_settings.h patching file conf-cc patching file conf-spawn patching file control.c patching file control.h patching file dk-filter.9 patching file dk-filter.sh patching file dkim.h patching file dkimbase.cpp patching file dkimbase.h patching file dkimdns.cpp patching file dkimdns.h patching file dkimfuncs.cpp patching file dkimsign.cpp patching file dkimsign.h patching file dkimtest.c patching file dkimverify.cpp patching file dkimverify.h patching file dktrace.h patching file dns.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 11 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 22 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 49 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 85 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 198 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 299 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 321 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 379 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 408 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 420 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 490 (offset 2 lines). patching file dns.h patching file dnsfq.c patching file dnsptr.c patching file dnstxt.c patching file domainkeys.h patching file global.h patching file hier.c patching file hmac_md5.c patching file hmac_md5.h patching file ip.h patching file ipalloc.h patching file macros.h patching file maildirflags.c patching file maildirgetquota.c patching file maildirgetquota.h patching file maildirmisc.h patching file maildiropen.c patching file maildirparsequota.c patching file maildirquota.c patching file maildirquota.h patching file md5.h patching file md5c.c patching file numlib.h patching file overmaildirquota.c patching file qmail-control.9 patching file qmail-dk.8 patching file qmail-dk.c patching file qmail-dkim.9 patching file qmail-dkim.c patching file qmail-inject.c patching file qmail-local.c patching file qmail-lspawn.c patching file qmail-pop3d.c Hunk #3 FAILED at 81. Hunk #5 FAILED at 182. Hunk #6 FAILED at 228. 3 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail-pop3d.c.rej patching file qmail-popup.c Hunk #3 FAILED at 66. 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail-popup.c.rej patching file qmail-pw2u.c patching file qmail-qmtpd.c patching file qmail-remote.8 patching file qmail-remote.c patching file qmail-rspawn.c patching file qmail-send.9 patching file qmail-send.c patching file qmail-showctl.c patching file qmail-smtpd.8 patching file qmail-smtpd.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 68. Hunk #3 succeeded at 103 with fuzz 1. Hunk #7 succeeded at 300 with fuzz 1. 1 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail-smtpd.c.rej patching file qmail.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 40 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 88 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 119 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 139 (offset -11 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail.c.rej patching file qmail.h patching file qregex.c patching file qregex.h patching file qsutil.c patching file qsutil.h patching file scan_ulong.c patching file select.h2 patching file softwarelicense1-1.html patching file spawn-filter.9 patching file spawn-filter.c patching file spawn.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 6 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 62 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 72 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 155 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 204 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 240 (offset -1 lines). patching file spf.c patching file spf.h patching file spfquery.c patching file ssl_timeoutio.c patching file ssl_timeoutio.h patching file str.h patching file str_cpyb.c patching file strpidt.c patching file strsalloc.c patching file strsalloc.h patching file strtimet.c patching file tcp-env.c patching file tls.c patching file tls.h patching file update_tmprsadh.sh patching file wildmat.c -Message d'origine- De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu] Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 13:14 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth Hi, I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and chkuser. I can put together a package with just smtp-auth and chkuser if you like.. Anyway you can do it by yourself applying chkuser over smtp-tls and following
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi, my package was tested for netqmail-1.06. I think you are using qmail-1.03 regards Roberto On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:32:17 +0200, OVH wrote: Hi, Thank you for your patch, but it shows errors, so if you have only the patch with smtp-auth and chkuser i like it. Thanks! patching file FILES Hunk #1 succeeded at 135 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 337 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 406 (offset -1 lines). patching file MakeArgs.c patching file Makefile patching file Makefile-cert.mk patching file TARGETS patching file alloc.c patching file auto-int.c patching file auto-int8.c patching file auto-str.c patching file base64.c patching file base64.h patching file byte.h patching file byte_cspn.c patching file byte_rcspn.c patching file case_startb.c patching file chkspawn.c patching file chkuser.c patching file chkuser.h patching file chkuser_settings.h patching file conf-cc patching file conf-spawn patching file control.c patching file control.h patching file dk-filter.9 patching file dk-filter.sh patching file dkim.h patching file dkimbase.cpp patching file dkimbase.h patching file dkimdns.cpp patching file dkimdns.h patching file dkimfuncs.cpp patching file dkimsign.cpp patching file dkimsign.h patching file dkimtest.c patching file dkimverify.cpp patching file dkimverify.h patching file dktrace.h patching file dns.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 11 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 22 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 49 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 85 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 198 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 299 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 321 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 379 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 408 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 420 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 490 (offset 2 lines). patching file dns.h patching file dnsfq.c patching file dnsptr.c patching file dnstxt.c patching file domainkeys.h patching file global.h patching file hier.c patching file hmac_md5.c patching file hmac_md5.h patching file ip.h patching file ipalloc.h patching file macros.h patching file maildirflags.c patching file maildirgetquota.c patching file maildirgetquota.h patching file maildirmisc.h patching file maildiropen.c patching file maildirparsequota.c patching file maildirquota.c patching file maildirquota.h patching file md5.h patching file md5c.c patching file numlib.h patching file overmaildirquota.c patching file qmail-control.9 patching file qmail-dk.8 patching file qmail-dk.c patching file qmail-dkim.9 patching file qmail-dkim.c patching file qmail-inject.c patching file qmail-local.c patching file qmail-lspawn.c patching file qmail-pop3d.c Hunk #3 FAILED at 81. Hunk #5 FAILED at 182. Hunk #6 FAILED at 228. 3 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail-pop3d.c.rej patching file qmail-popup.c Hunk #3 FAILED at 66. 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail-popup.c.rej patching file qmail-pw2u.c patching file qmail-qmtpd.c patching file qmail-remote.8 patching file qmail-remote.c patching file qmail-rspawn.c patching file qmail-send.9 patching file qmail-send.c patching file qmail-showctl.c patching file qmail-smtpd.8 patching file qmail-smtpd.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 68. Hunk #3 succeeded at 103 with fuzz 1. Hunk #7 succeeded at 300 with fuzz 1. 1 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail-smtpd.c.rej patching file qmail.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 40 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 88 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 119 (offset -11 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 139 (offset -11 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmail.c.rej patching file qmail.h patching file qregex.c patching file qregex.h patching file qsutil.c patching file qsutil.h patching file scan_ulong.c patching file select.h2 patching file softwarelicense1-1.html patching file spawn-filter.9 patching file spawn-filter.c patching file spawn.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 6 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 62 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 72 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 155 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 204 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 240 (offset -1 lines). patching file spf.c patching file spf.h patching file spfquery.c patching file ssl_timeoutio.c patching file ssl_timeoutio.h patching file str.h patching file str_cpyb.c patching file strpidt.c patching file strsalloc.c patching file strsalloc.h patching file strtimet.c patching file tcp-env.c patching file tls.c patching file tls.h patching file update_tmprsadh.sh patching file wildmat.c -Message d'origine- De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu] Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 13:14 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth Hi, I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and chkuser. I can put
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi, Yes , I using qmail-1.03 ... I testing manual applying chkuser patch ... Thanks ! -Message d'origine- De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu] Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 14:44 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth Hi, my package was tested for netqmail-1.06. I think you are using qmail-1.03 regards Roberto !DSPAM:4dc14b3232711554614968!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato? (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?). Remo On 5/4/11 5:14 AM, Roberto Puzzanghera ad...@sagredo.eu wrote: Hi, I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and chkuser. I can put together a package with just smtp-auth and chkuser if you like.. Anyway you can do it by yourself applying chkuser over smtp-tls and following the directives of the author of chkuser http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/installation/ma nual.html best regards Roberto Puzzanghera On Wed, 4 May 2011 09:56:15 +0200, OVH wrote: Hi, On my Qmail 1.03 I can not simultaneously apply smtp-auth patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-0510) and chkuser (chkuser-2.0.8b-release or chkuser-2.0.9-release). It seems that there is a conflict between these two patches. you know a patch which includes 2 or a solution to the conflict ? Thanks! !DSPAM:4dc1642332711033613866!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote: Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato? (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?). Ciao Remo, the link to the surbl patch is still broken for months http://www.surbl.org/qmail/011_surbl I would be glad if someone can provide the original patch (or suggest another one) so that I can add it to my package. btw at the moment I'm using spamassin's URIDNSBL support and I see that is effective in filtering spam. ciao Roberto Puzzanghera !DSPAM:4dc1ab9932718297820811!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Grazie Remo, anyway I managed to find here http://surbl.freeapp.net/qmail/011_surbl the patch that I was looking for. It's already embedded into my package. On next days I'll do more tests. regards Roberto On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:56:52 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote: Sorry one more http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/programs/qmail-rbl.c Remo On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, Roberto Puzzanghera ad...@sagredo.eu wrote: On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote: Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato? (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?). Ciao Remo, the link to the surbl patch is still broken for months http://www.surbl.org/qmail/011_surbl I would be glad if someone can provide the original patch (or suggest another one) so that I can add it to my package. btw at the moment I'm using spamassin's URIDNSBL support and I see that is effective in filtering spam. ciao Roberto Puzzanghera !DSPAM:4dc1dd4832711779012547!
[vchkpw] qmail aliases fail; chkuser 2.0.9 + vpopmail 5.4.25
I have several domains hosted via vpopmail, and I use chkuser 2.0.9 to block dictionary-attack spam. chkuser appears to have broken my ability to use qmail's dash aliases for vpopmail domains. For example, if I had a vpopmail account called m...@example.com, prior to chkuser I was able to send mail to matt-...@example.com and it would be delivered to the m...@example.com Maildir. After installing chkuser 2.0.9, this feature stopped working. chkuser 2.0.9 appears supports dash aliases by default. This is the relevant line from chkuser_settings.h: #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS But this doesn't seem to work for vpopmail-hosted domains -- only for the domain that is hosted natively within qmail (listed in /var/qmail/control/locals). The specific problem this causes me now is that ezmlm-idx mailing lists cannot be used for vpopmail domains, because ezmlm relies on dash aliases. For example, a moderation reply address looks like: listname-accept-h...@example.com whereas the delivery address is actually: listname-acc...@example.com Subscription confirmation requests are similarly broken. Is chkuser known to support qmail aliases within vpopmail? Related to the above, is chkuser 2.0.9 known to be compatible with ezmlm-idx 7.1.1? Thank you. -- matt. !DSPAM:4dbe6d7d32712061814254!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail aliases fail; chkuser 2.0.9 + vpopmail 5.4.25
aliases are .qmail-aliasname files. matt-foo is not an alias. It is an extension of name matt. For enabling extensions you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS For enabling ezmlm lists, you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS. See http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/chkuser_settings.html for more info. Regards, Tonino I have several domains hosted via vpopmail, and I use chkuser 2.0.9 to block dictionary-attack spam. chkuser appears to have broken my ability to use qmail's dash aliases for vpopmail domains. For example, if I had a vpopmail account called m...@example.com, prior to chkuser I was able to send mail to matt-...@example.com and it would be delivered to the m...@example.com Maildir. After installing chkuser 2.0.9, this feature stopped working. chkuser 2.0.9 appears supports dash aliases by default. This is the relevant line from chkuser_settings.h: #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS But this doesn't seem to work for vpopmail-hosted domains -- only for the domain that is hosted natively within qmail (listed in /var/qmail/control/locals). The specific problem this causes me now is that ezmlm-idx mailing lists cannot be used for vpopmail domains, because ezmlm relies on dash aliases. For example, a moderation reply address looks like: listname-accept-h...@example.com whereas the delivery address is actually: listname-acc...@example.com Subscription confirmation requests are similarly broken. Is chkuser known to support qmail aliases within vpopmail? Related to the above, is chkuser 2.0.9 known to be compatible with ezmlm-idx 7.1.1? Thank you. -- matt. -- Inter@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it to...@interazioni.it !DSPAM:4dbe7ad532711580627967!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail aliases fail; chkuser 2.0.9 + vpopmail 5.4.25
On 5/2/11 2:35 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: aliases are .qmail-aliasname files. matt-foo is not an alias. It is an extension of name matt. Thank you for the clarification. For enabling extensions you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS For enabling ezmlm lists, you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS. This one was already enabled/uncommented: #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS I have now enabled this one: #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS This one was already enabled: #define CHKUSER_USERS_DASH '-' I finally made everything work. For future searchers, this was the solution: 1- rebuild vpopmail after passing the --enable-qmail-ext argument to its configure script 2- uncomment/enable both the following: #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS_DEFAULT #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS in chkuser_settings.h 3- rebuild qmail (in my case, netqmail-1.05) Thank you, Tonino. -- matt. !DSPAM:4dbeeb3f32711447712028!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/dovecot/vpopmail/oLDAP/sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/29/2010 05:42 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On 10/09/10 02:14, Matt Brookings wrote: On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote: Matt Brookings wrote: Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes address books and single sign on easy. This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would recommend waiting for that. Any news on this? It's still actively being worked on! - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkykly0ACgkQIwet2/rgZyyx6ACfSpKqXoZU3X94OrGWks1cmybp q/UAni65gnUMz8pKKKa0Gt2TZjnqVfsa =ku5H -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/dovecot/vpopmail/oLDAP/sogo
Shane Chrisp wrote: On 10/09/10 02:14, Matt Brookings wrote: On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote: Matt Brookings wrote: Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes address books and single sign on easy. This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would recommend waiting for that. Any news on this? Thx Peter !DSPAM:4ca3c0bc32711613010878!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/dovecot/vpopmail/oLDAP/sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2010 05:24 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote: So will this work / support my needs? OpenLDAP netqmail (anybody used Zinq - http://sourceforge.net/projects/zinq/ ) dovecot - talking to LDAP vpopmail for 'linking' LDAP and Qmail + virtual domain management Sogo / imaps (no pop at all) with in a second stage Funabol MySQL only for Sogo Agenda. Would like to use LDAP for AddressBooks User Auth Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes address books and single sign on easy. This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would recommend waiting for that. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyI8cUACgkQIwet2/rgZyz6HwCglFanCaVnWsOvdp2B8O5cgzDX 17QAnREQqBnpvfMS+S1okGw5lQui2zIu =UK/n -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/dovecot/vpopmail/oLDAP/sogo
Matt Brookings wrote: Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes address books and single sign on easy. This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would recommend waiting for that. Cool... I can be a 'beta-tester' ;-) Regards Peter !DSPAM:4c891b2832711451586764!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/dovecot/vpopmail/oLDAP/sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote: Matt Brookings wrote: Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes address books and single sign on easy. This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would recommend waiting for that. Cool... I can be a 'beta-tester' ;-) I will send an email to the list when the new LDAP backend has been added to Subversion. I'll probably package up a snapshot too. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyJI/8ACgkQIwet2/rgZywH6QCdEpR2fIdjEMuu2J9O7U66xJQB TTYAnRmkuAnsASR4kJ8oDISFaFTNgHpY =++Ge -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/dovecot/vpopmail/oLDAP/sogo
On 10/09/10 02:14, Matt Brookings wrote: On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote: Matt Brookings wrote: Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes address books and single sign on easy. This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would recommend waiting for that. Cool... I can be a 'beta-tester' ;-) I will send an email to the list when the new LDAP backend has been added to Subversion. I'll probably package up a snapshot too. I too am looking forward to the ldap release. We have just moved everything to ldap so it will be nice to keep everything in one place. Shane !DSPAM:4c8998d032711646211127!
[vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
Hello everyone...I have qmail and vpopmail v5.4.30I tested vpopmail and it can add domains and users; I can get user's info from db.The compiled a patch ( SMTP AUTH and TLS). I get this error when I tried to send an email using TLS Jun 29 22:56:47 myserver vpopmail[7315]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found myu...@mydomain.com:MYLOCALIP The user exist in the database. in qmail log is:@40004c2adcb3008b7cfc vmysql: can't read settings from /data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysqlthe data in the file is rightthe copy of my qmail-smtpd/run is exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /data/apps/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw true maildir 21 Any idea in what do I have have bad/wrong configured? regards. _ 'La vida es dura. Después de todo, te mata.' Katharine Houghton Hepburn (1907-2003) __m___m__ ||(O O)|| ||(~)|| !DSPAM:4c2ae1c732713170016224!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
Im not sure how you installed vpopmail, but check this, what is in /data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file, is mysql info right, and be sure to check permissions, owner of vpopmail.mysql needs to be same user that is owner of vpopmail (usually vpopmail user vchkpw group, that is if you havent changed anything) From: Den Arion Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 8:18 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw Hello everyone... I have qmail and vpopmail v5.4.30 I tested vpopmail and it can add domains and users; I can get user's info from db. The compiled a patch ( SMTP AUTH and TLS). I get this error when I tried to send an email using TLS Jun 29 22:56:47 myserver vpopmail[7315]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found myu...@mydomain.com:MYLOCALIP The user exist in the database. in qmail log is: @40004c2adcb3008b7cfc vmysql: can't read settings from /data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql the data in the file is right the copy of my qmail-smtpd/run is exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /data/apps/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw true maildir 21 Any idea in what do I have have bad/wrong configured? regards. _ 'La vida es dura. Después de todo, te mata.' Katharine Houghton Hepburn (1907-2003) __m___m__ ||(O O)|| ||(~)|| !DSPAM:4c2affdb32715641827621!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
It's look like a permission problem. When you create your u...@domain, you create it using the ~vpopmail/bin/vadduser in a root session? Check your $QMAILDUID and $NOFILESGID in the sh script, be sure that user.group are the owner of the tree /data/apps/vpopmail/* Gook luck Martin From: Jerkovic Bosko Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:26 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw Im not sure how you installed vpopmail, but check this, what is in /data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file, is mysql info right, and be sure to check permissions, owner of vpopmail.mysql needs to be same user that is owner of vpopmail (usually vpopmail user vchkpw group, that is if you havent changed anything) From: Den Arion Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 8:18 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw Hello everyone... I have qmail and vpopmail v5.4.30 I tested vpopmail and it can add domains and users; I can get user's info from db. The compiled a patch ( SMTP AUTH and TLS). I get this error when I tried to send an email using TLS Jun 29 22:56:47 myserver vpopmail[7315]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found myu...@mydomain.com:MYLOCALIP The user exist in the database. in qmail log is: @40004c2adcb3008b7cfc vmysql: can't read settings from /data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql the data in the file is right the copy of my qmail-smtpd/run is exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /data/apps/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw true maildir 21 Any idea in what do I have have bad/wrong configured? regards. _ 'La vida es dura. Después de todo, te mata.' Katharine Houghton Hepburn (1907-2003) __m___m__ ||(O O)|| ||(~)|| !DSPAM:4c2b118332716819036636!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Den Arion wrote: exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /data/apps/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw true maildir 21 This is your problem. The qmaild user can't access vpopmail resources. You need to run this as vpopmail:vchkpw. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwrUSUACgkQIwet2/rgZyxHbQCdEGhnpV5BrR5sTB0yQ1YzAqKu QJgAmwbN83qmpylndtRWQ/SWC9BIbnbD =RnLb -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
Mat.. Thank you. I switches to vpopmail.vchkpw and the service started to work. I appreciated your help and the people in the list. Have a wonderful day. -Original Message- From: Matt Brookings [mailto:m...@inter7.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:14 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Den Arion wrote: exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /data/apps/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw true maildir 21 This is your problem. The qmaild user can't access vpopmail resources. You need to run this as vpopmail:vchkpw. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwrUSUACgkQIwet2/rgZyxHbQCdEGhnpV5BrR5sTB0yQ1YzAqKu QJgAmwbN83qmpylndtRWQ/SWC9BIbnbD =RnLb -END PGP SIGNATURE- !DSPAM:4c2b62f432713309417168!
[vchkpw] qmail - vpopmail delivery
Hello, Im having some issues, i recently reinstalled qmail and now, im able to send mail, but all mail received goes to /home/user/Maildir instead of vpopmail delivery. Can anyone suggest what files needs to be modified to get delivery back to the vpopmail instad of home directories ? Thanks. !DSPAM:4c23724932714595952374!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
Hello,
I'm pretty sure this script is working well but this is what I've recently
done :
1° Modify MX test domain
2° Stop previous server+ copy DB
previous_server:~# /etc/init.d/apache2 stop
previous_server:~#
/usr/bin/mysqldump -c -C -e -Q --add-drop-table -uroot -p***password***
vpopmail /backups/vpopmail.sql
previous_server:~# scp /backups/vpopmail.sql r...@new_server
previous_server:~# qmailctl stop
3° Copy config files
previous_server:~# cd /var/qmail/control
previous_server:~# scp morercpthosts rcpthosts virtualdomains
r...@new_server:/var/qmail/control
previous_server:~# cd /var/qmail/users
previous_server:~# scp assign r...@news_server:/var/qmail/users/
4° Import DB + synchronise mails
new_server:~# qmailctl stop
new_server:~# mysql -Dvpopmail -p***password*** /root/vpopmail.sql
new_server:~# sed s/1007:111/1007:112/g /var/qmail/users/assign
/var/qmail/users/assign.new
(ADADT the UID/GID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in previous_server
and new_server)
new_server:~# cat /var/qmail/users/assign.new
new_server:~# mv /var/qmail/users/assign.new /var/qmail/users/assign
new_server:~# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newu
new_server:~# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newmrh
new_server:~# rsync -avz --delete
r...@previous_server:/home/vpopmail/domains/ /home/vpopmail/domains/
new_server:~# #find /home/vpopmail -uid 1007 -exec chown vpopmail {} \;
(ADADT the UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in previous_server and
new_server)
new_server:~# #find /home/vpopmail -gid 1008 -exec chgrp vchkpw {} \;
(ADADT the UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in previous_server and
new_server)
new_server:~# mysql
use vpopmail;
update dir_control SET domain='dom_1007' WHERE domain='dom_1054'; (ADADT the
UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# qmailctl start
Hope this help !
Thibault
- Original Message -
From: Ron Miller rmil...@coinserv.net
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:20 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
Here is how:
http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/migrate-domain.shtml
Be sure NOT to use IE. Use Firefox instead.
I have used this script many times.
-Ron
-Original Message-
From: ta...@nayatel.com [mailto:ta...@nayatel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:34 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
please suggest
I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following
steps but no luck.
1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine.
2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine.
3- Fixed all permissions.
while giving command vdomaininfo or vuserinof it does not find the domain.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
!DSPAM:4c1881f032712969921331!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
Thanks to every body for valuable suggestions. I am working to have
actual migration in next few days.
Another question. I want to install 2 or 3 qmail servers in a load
balancing and active failover model.
Can any body help suggest the design from your experience... thanks
Tariq
Quoting Thibault Richard th...@thibs.com:
Hello,
I'm pretty sure this script is working well but this is what I've
recently done :
1° Modify MX test domain
2° Stop previous server+ copy DB
previous_server:~# /etc/init.d/apache2 stop
previous_server:~# /usr/bin/mysqldump -c -C -e -Q --add-drop-table
-uroot -p***password*** vpopmail /backups/vpopmail.sql
previous_server:~# scp /backups/vpopmail.sql r...@new_server
previous_server:~# qmailctl stop
3° Copy config files
previous_server:~# cd /var/qmail/control
previous_server:~# scp morercpthosts rcpthosts virtualdomains
r...@new_server:/var/qmail/control
previous_server:~# cd /var/qmail/users
previous_server:~# scp assign r...@news_server:/var/qmail/users/
4° Import DB + synchronise mails
new_server:~# qmailctl stop
new_server:~# mysql -Dvpopmail -p***password*** /root/vpopmail.sql
new_server:~# sed s/1007:111/1007:112/g /var/qmail/users/assign
/var/qmail/users/assign.new
(ADADT the UID/GID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in
previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# cat /var/qmail/users/assign.new
new_server:~# mv /var/qmail/users/assign.new /var/qmail/users/assign
new_server:~# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newu
new_server:~# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newmrh
new_server:~# rsync -avz --delete
r...@previous_server:/home/vpopmail/domains/ /home/vpopmail/domains/
new_server:~# #find /home/vpopmail -uid 1007 -exec chown vpopmail {} \;
(ADADT the UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in
previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# #find /home/vpopmail -gid 1008 -exec chgrp vchkpw {} \;
(ADADT the UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in
previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# mysql
use vpopmail;
update dir_control SET domain='dom_1007' WHERE domain='dom_1054';
(ADADT the UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in
previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# qmailctl start
Hope this help !
Thibault
- Original Message - From: Ron Miller rmil...@coinserv.net
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:20 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
Here is how:
http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/migrate-domain.shtml
Be sure NOT to use IE. Use Firefox instead.
I have used this script many times.
-Ron
-Original Message-
From: ta...@nayatel.com [mailto:ta...@nayatel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:34 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
please suggest
I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following
steps but no luck.
1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine.
2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine.
3- Fixed all permissions.
while giving command vdomaininfo or vuserinof it does not find the domain..
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
!DSPAM:4c18cf5132711705318265!
[vchkpw] Qmail migration
please suggest I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following steps but no luck. 1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine. 2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine. 3- Fixed all permissions. while giving command vdomaininfo or vuserinof it does not find the domain. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. !DSPAM:4c17b9a232713137615642!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
On 15/06/2010 1:34 PM, ta...@nayatel.com wrote: please suggest I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following steps but no luck. 1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine. 2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine. 3- Fixed all permissions. while giving command vdomaininfo or vuserinof it does not find the domain. Hi, Did you copy over the contents of /var/qmail/control and /var/qmail/users ? Regards, Rick !DSPAM:4c17c03e32717630316849!
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
Here is how: http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/migrate-domain.shtml Be sure NOT to use IE. Use Firefox instead. I have used this script many times. -Ron -Original Message- From: ta...@nayatel.com [mailto:ta...@nayatel.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:34 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail migration please suggest I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following steps but no luck. 1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine. 2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine. 3- Fixed all permissions. while giving command vdomaininfo or vuserinof it does not find the domain. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. !DSPAM:4c18194532718214062253!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
- ta...@nayatel.com a écrit : please suggest I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following steps but no luck. 1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine. 2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine. 3- Fixed all permissions. while giving command vdomaininfo or vuserinof it does not find the domain. Hello, you forget /var/qmail/users/ Bye. -- Nicolas Croiset - VDL - ncroi...@vdl.fr !DSPAM:4c1855bd32719502116462!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap
DAve wrote: Good morning, We have been using qmail-tap to send copies of one domains emails to an archive server. The other day the archive server failed and the messages began filling up my qmail queue. Is there a way I can setup a separate queue just for the messages being created by the qmail-tap process? Never mind. I just created a second instance of qmail at /var/qmail-archive. smtproutes in the public instance sends the archive messages to the archive process listening on 127.0.0.1, and smtproutes in the archive process sends the messages to the archive server itself. If we ever have an issue again, all archive mail can just pile up in the /var/qmail-archive queue. Dave -- Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it. John Adams http://appleseedinfo.org !DSPAM:4b27ed6432717617036155!
[vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation
Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an email out with outlook. Thanks !DSPAM:4a4d849232711256210727!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation
I've never had any issues with them personally (aside from not liking the concept) but as far as I know neither vpopmail nor qmail have anything to do with delivery confirmation. It's a MUA to MUA thing and the recipient can decide if he wants to confirm he read the message. Your client just needs to check the confirm delivery box in outlook. Regards, Tren - Original Message - From: Remo Mattei r...@italy1.com To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thu Jul 02 21:09:47 2009 Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an email out with outlook. Thanks !DSPAM:4a4d9db232716311574383!
[vchkpw] Qmail -vpopmail - dovecot IMAP and push option
Hello all, I wonder if anyone has setup a push mail server (iphone, blackberry etc..) with Qmail, vpopmail and Dovecot imap server. Thanks any suggestions are welcomed. Remo !DSPAM:4995f6d132682909899221!
[vchkpw] Qmail/vpopmail with push email OT
Hello guys does anyone of you setup a push email with vpopmail and qmail? If you have done it could you send me the info.. Where to look at. Thanks, Remo !DSPAM:48bb06e032318585112342!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail admin quota assignment
compile qmail-admin with --enable-modify-quota --- - Nick Bright Network Administrator Terra World Communications, LLC Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 Fax 620-332-1201 Tariq Azad/OPS wrote: Can any body tell me how to enable quota in qmail admin so that postmaster could assign quota from the qmailadmin control panel Thanks. !DSPAM:489873b032315753898114!
[vchkpw] Qmail admin quota assignment
Can any body tell me how to enable quota in qmail admin so that postmaster could assign quota from the qmailadmin control panel Thanks. !DSPAM:4885c8f632311215818933!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail admin quota assignment
Tariq Azad/OPS a écrit : Can any body tell me how to enable quota in qmail admin so that postmaster could assign quota from the qmailadmin control panel Thanks. I think you must compile qmail with quota support. !DSPAM:4885f09a32311776915901!
[vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail
Is it possible to make Qmail tap only tap the incoming mail? My problem is that I am trying to get mail to deliver to two places to ease the transition to a new mail server. Qmail tap allows that functionality but breaks down on inter-domain email. The person who sends it typically gets the mail in the new mail box and the person receiving it does not get a copy depending on where the names are in the qmail tap control file. Is there a way to make qmail tap do what I want it to do or is there a better solution? Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew !DSPAM:48109da6120501680752143!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail
What i did was... old server - Change TTL values in zonefile to 5 minutes and wait till it is propagated (normally 1 day) - Create domain and popboxes on new server - Copy contents from old server to new server with scp (popboxes) - remove domain and popboxes from old server - Disable pop access on old server (with vmoduser -p domain.com) - change DNS settings and MX records for domains to point to new server - place domainname in /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts on old server so qmail will still accept incoming mail - place domainname:ip_address_of_new server in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes on old server to forward incoming mail to the new server - after dns has propagated remove entries on old server from /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts and /var/qmail/control/smtproutes files. - Change TTL back to normal During a window of 5 minutes its possible clients (users) will try to connect using pop to the old server, just tell them to try again later. - Original Message - From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail Is it possible to make Qmail tap only tap the incoming mail? My problem is that I am trying to get mail to deliver to two places to ease the transition to a new mail server. Qmail tap allows that functionality but breaks down on inter-domain email. The person who sends it typically gets the mail in the new mail box and the person receiving it does not get a copy depending on where the names are in the qmail tap control file. Is there a way to make qmail tap do what I want it to do or is there a better solution? Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew !DSPAM:48109ffb120509988676439!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail
That will not work for this particular migration. They need two separate systems for 6months as they test the new and be able to use the old one at any time. That is why qmail tap looked ideal. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Wouter van der Schagt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What i did was... old server - Change TTL values in zonefile to 5 minutes and wait till it is propagated (normally 1 day) - Create domain and popboxes on new server - Copy contents from old server to new server with scp (popboxes) - remove domain and popboxes from old server - Disable pop access on old server (with vmoduser -p domain.com) - change DNS settings and MX records for domains to point to new server - place domainname in /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts on old server so qmail will still accept incoming mail - place domainname:ip_address_of_new server in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes on old server to forward incoming mail to the new server - after dns has propagated remove entries on old server from /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts and /var/qmail/control/smtproutes files. - Change TTL back to normal During a window of 5 minutes its possible clients (users) will try to connect using pop to the old server, just tell them to try again later. - Original Message - From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail Is it possible to make Qmail tap only tap the incoming mail? My problem is that I am trying to get mail to deliver to two places to ease the transition to a new mail server. Qmail tap allows that functionality but breaks down on inter-domain email. The person who sends it typically gets the mail in the new mail box and the person receiving it does not get a copy depending on where the names are in the qmail tap control file. Is there a way to make qmail tap do what I want it to do or is there a better solution? Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew !DSPAM:4810ac80120501054450223!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail
Sorry, personally im not familiar with qmail-tap, just thought this could help you. Goodluck in your endavors. - Wouter - Original Message - From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:22 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail That will not work for this particular migration. They need two separate systems for 6months as they test the new and be able to use the old one at any time. That is why qmail tap looked ideal. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Wouter van der Schagt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What i did was... old server - Change TTL values in zonefile to 5 minutes and wait till it is propagated (normally 1 day) - Create domain and popboxes on new server - Copy contents from old server to new server with scp (popboxes) - remove domain and popboxes from old server - Disable pop access on old server (with vmoduser -p domain.com) - change DNS settings and MX records for domains to point to new server - place domainname in /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts on old server so qmail will still accept incoming mail - place domainname:ip_address_of_new server in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes on old server to forward incoming mail to the new server - after dns has propagated remove entries on old server from /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts and /var/qmail/control/smtproutes files. - Change TTL back to normal During a window of 5 minutes its possible clients (users) will try to connect using pop to the old server, just tell them to try again later. - Original Message - From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail Is it possible to make Qmail tap only tap the incoming mail? My problem is that I am trying to get mail to deliver to two places to ease the transition to a new mail server. Qmail tap allows that functionality but breaks down on inter-domain email. The person who sends it typically gets the mail in the new mail box and the person receiving it does not get a copy depending on where the names are in the qmail tap control file. Is there a way to make qmail tap do what I want it to do or is there a better solution? Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew !DSPAM:4810af1a12050192660!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail
Maybe just rsync at regular intervals after initial replication? You could also create a second local qmail install with an smtproutes entry for the local domain to point to the new server. Then add a forward within a global maildrop filter using /var/qmail2/bin/forward (which will use your 2nd install's smtproutes to hit the new box) Either should get all incoming mail replicated. Rick On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:22 -0600, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: That will not work for this particular migration. They need two separate systems for 6months as they test the new and be able to use the old one at any time. That is why qmail tap looked ideal. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Wouter van der Schagt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What i did was... old server - Change TTL values in zonefile to 5 minutes and wait till it is propagated (normally 1 day) - Create domain and popboxes on new server - Copy contents from old server to new server with scp (popboxes) - remove domain and popboxes from old server - Disable pop access on old server (with vmoduser -p domain.com) - change DNS settings and MX records for domains to point to new server - place domainname in /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts on old server so qmail will still accept incoming mail - place domainname:ip_address_of_new server in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes on old server to forward incoming mail to the new server - after dns has propagated remove entries on old server from /var/qmail/control/morercptshosts and /var/qmail/control/smtproutes files. - Change TTL back to normal During a window of 5 minutes its possible clients (users) will try to connect using pop to the old server, just tell them to try again later. - Original Message - From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail Tap tap only incoming mail Is it possible to make Qmail tap only tap the incoming mail? My problem is that I am trying to get mail to deliver to two places to ease the transition to a new mail server. Qmail tap allows that functionality but breaks down on inter-domain email. The person who sends it typically gets the mail in the new mail box and the person receiving it does not get a copy depending on where the names are in the qmail tap control file. Is there a way to make qmail tap do what I want it to do or is there a better solution? Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew !DSPAM:4810b2c6120501403623091!
Re: [vchkpw] issue with vchkpw + qmail
Hi! Probably your mail client does a wrong AUTH before passing the correct login data. At least I had something similar with Thunderbird a while ago. F. Leeber TRM schrieb: Hi, i have one issue with vchkpw, whenever any user sending mail from mail client , i'm getting following, but the user is able to send and receive mail tail -f /var/log/maillog Jan 31 16:23:38 mail vpopmail[4881]: vchkpw-smtp: password fail (pass: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]') [EMAIL PROTECTED]:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx But the thing is that he is able to send receive mail , whatt could be the problem, Thanks Regards, Tarak -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ing. Florian Leeber, Bakk. techn. Tel +43-1-2082049 Mobil +43-699-11404079 Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:47a4d4a4310543451117958!
[vchkpw] issue with vchkpw + qmail
Hi, i have one issue with vchkpw, whenever any user sending mail from mail client , i'm getting following, but the user is able to send and receive mail tail -f /var/log/maillog Jan 31 16:23:38 mail vpopmail[4881]: vchkpw-smtp: password fail (pass: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]') [EMAIL PROTECTED]:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx But the thing is that he is able to send receive mail , whatt could be the problem, Thanks Regards, Tarak !DSPAM:47a1b75f310541883719043!
[vchkpw] qmail + smtp-auth + chkuser + vpopmail = messed up pipes?
Hi folks, after rather long but then successul compile marathon I finally habe everything in place...but... - inbound mail without SMTP auth works fine - outbound mail with auth leads basically to some messed up pipes or file descriptors whatever, look at this: ehlo () 250-www.happyserverfriends.info 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN 250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN 250-PIPELINING 250 8BITMIME AUTH PLAIN (xx) 235 ok, go ahead (#2.0.0) mail from: (x) CHKUSER accepted sender: from gmx.at:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote test.at:unknown:127.0.0.1 rcpt : sender accepted 250 ok after the mail from the log line form chkuser does not appear in the log file, instead it appears at the client?s side! therefore all clients choke and won?t send any mail... this prevents me to use smtp auth at the moment - plz help, as a handful of users is waiting desperately for outgoing mails, thx! kind regards, F. Leeber -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ing. Florian Leeber, Bakk. techn. Tel +43-1-2082049 Mobil +43-699-11404079 Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:47a11df2310549081918933!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + smtp-auth + chkuser + vpopmail = messed up pipes?
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined.shtml Try the patch there. And take this up with Mr. Simpson if you have problems with his patch (you should not) !DSPAM:47a1341c310546330020416!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat =
CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what
the parent is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but
does it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my
test server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure:
user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did it
and I'm remembering wrong?
no matter, I found what I did wrong, I ommited the variable in
tcp.smtp
file :)
it now works as stated.
But I agree it would be nice to do by default without adding into that
file if it is defined.
Hi!
well my current solution is to check all mailboxes with a perl script
and
add those email addresses to be removed from validrcptto.txt file...
then
rebuild validrcptto.cdb... and mail won't be accepted for them... but
this
is a permanent failure error.. should be better to be specified a 450 at
smtp time for example as error code...
have a nice day!
Antonio's Chkusr works perfect maybe you could look at implementing it :)
will save a lot of hassle
yes but it breaks auth... or unless some month ago
It works with auth... it depends which version of auth you are using.
Check Shupp's toaster version, it is ok.
Tonino
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Interazioni di Antonio Nati
http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!DSPAM:475fbac032001751892186!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat =
CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what
the parent is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but
does it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my
test server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure:
user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did it
and I'm remembering wrong?
no matter, I found what I did wrong, I ommited the variable in
tcp.smtp
file :)
it now works as stated.
But I agree it would be nice to do by default without adding into that
file if it is defined.
Hi!
well my current solution is to check all mailboxes with a perl script
and
add those email addresses to be removed from validrcptto.txt file...
then
rebuild validrcptto.cdb... and mail won't be accepted for them... but
this
is a permanent failure error.. should be better to be specified a 450 at
smtp time for example as error code...
have a nice day!
Antonio's Chkusr works perfect maybe you could look at implementing it :)
will save a lot of hassle
yes but it breaks auth... or unless some month ago
!DSPAM:475fb80632005951316819!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and
behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat =
CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what
the parent is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but
does it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my
test server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure:
user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or
has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did
it
and I'm remembering wrong?
no matter, I found what I did wrong, I ommited the variable in
tcp.smtp
file :)
it now works as stated.
But I agree it would be nice to do by default without adding into that
file if it is defined.
Hi!
well my current solution is to check all mailboxes with a perl script
and
add those email addresses to be removed from validrcptto.txt file...
then
rebuild validrcptto.cdb... and mail won't be accepted for them... but
this
is a permanent failure error.. should be better to be specified a 450
at
smtp time for example as error code...
have a nice day!
Antonio's Chkusr works perfect maybe you could look at implementing it
:)
will save a lot of hassle
yes but it breaks auth... or unless some month ago
Thanks to all for you're answers mates :) :) :)
!DSPAM:475fb96332001850478308!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat =
CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what
the parent is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but
does it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my
test server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure:
user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did it
and I'm remembering wrong?
no matter, I found what I did wrong, I ommited the variable in tcp.smtp
file :)
it now works as stated.
But I agree it would be nice to do by default without adding into that
file if it is defined.
Hi!
well my current solution is to check all mailboxes with a perl script and
add those email addresses to be removed from validrcptto.txt file... then
rebuild validrcptto.cdb... and mail won't be accepted for them... but this
is a permanent failure error.. should be better to be specified a 450 at
smtp time for example as error code...
have a nice day!
Antonio's Chkusr works perfect maybe you could look at implementing it :)
will save a lot of hassle
!DSPAM:475e816632001610717592!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Rick Romero wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat =
CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what
the parent is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but
does it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my
test server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure:
user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did it
and I'm remembering wrong?
no matter, I found what I did wrong, I ommited the variable in tcp.smtp
file :)
it now works as stated.
But I agree it would be nice to do by default without adding into that
file if it is defined.
Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the
case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100
by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you
would already expect that function to just work, not go to another place
and enable something else. Having the environment variable is great,
then if you want to alter the default, you can set it there...
Just my .02.
Rick
Rick
I believe that Tonino has set this for the tcp.smtp otherwise you need
to recompile qmail everytime you need to change the setting for the quota.
Just my 2 cents.
Remo
!DSPAM:475eb32932001630015932!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Rick Romero ha scritto: Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100 by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you would already expect that function to just work, not go to another place and enable something else. Having the environment variable is great, then if you want to alter the default, you can set it there... Just my .02. Rick Rick I believe that Tonino has set this for the tcp.smtp otherwise you need to recompile qmail everytime you need to change the setting for the quota. Just my 2 cents. Remo Right - that makes sense, but as it is now when it's enabled, it's not REALLY enabled until the environment is set. The environment is required, it's not an option. This is because in the chkuser.c the limit is set to 0, which disables the check. If, by default, the limit was set to 100, then it would be enabled by the define AND you can change the limit in environment or disable it by setting the environment to 0. To me the environment variables should override the 'standard' - and if you've enabled 'smtp bouncing', you shouldn't have to add the environment as well (imho, enabling it twice). Rick, the standard I'm following in chkuser, whenever possible, is the following: each time a variable is needed/used, it must be defined, otherwise the feature is disabled. You see this for each variable you can use: enabling variable, bad rcpt limit variable, quota variable, etc. This is a double security against unwanted features, very useful for new features within new releases. Tonino Rick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Interazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:475ec7ba32001560123944!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Courier-Imap (authlib) and Vpopmail trouble
On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro wrote: My system is: uname -a Linux devel 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Mon Dec 3 18:30:06 BRST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux I got the same problem on x86_32 too. Always inside a PVM of XEN, out of XEN, vchkpw works fine. I do a workarround with my patched qmail (AUTH_CDB patch) from JMS qmail patch, onchance script maintain a /var/qmail/control/auth.cdb in sync with vpopmail user db, so I can login via smtp-auth with AUTH_CDB qmail patch. But I'd like to see vchkpw working fine inside a virtual machine... :) Is it possible to compile and install vchkpw with debugging information, so we can find out which call to strstr() called the segfault? Or is it the getrlimit() call from the strace? Maybe you could email me a more detailed trace off-list and I'll try to find the section of code that's actually crashing? If you grep through the ChangeLog for 64, you'll see that we've made various changes to support 64-bit over the past few years. I'm guessing that this is another 64-bit issue, maybe one that only comes up on machines with lots of RAM? -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vpopmail - virtual domains for qmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ QmailAdmin - web interface for Vpopmail: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ !DSPAM:475d7c7332006819015875!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
On Dec 9, 2007, at 6:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if users we're trying to deliver is overquota instead of bouncing it... black lists are nowadays becoming quite crazy IMHO but they're know blacklisting this servers who bounce overquota... well infact now all servers that bounce directly... it would be a nice idea to reject messages for overquoted mailboxes... I've proposed the following solution, a few times over the years, and I still think it's a good one. It would fit your needs (and most people's needs) well. Someone needs to make a qmail-smtpd patch that calls an external program to verify an account. That way, there's a single qmail-smtpd patch and you can come up with whatever program (chkuser, validrcptto, etc.) you want to verify an account. You'd pass in the sender's address and the attempted recipient address. The program can have different exit codes for different conditions, and can even output a custom reject message. This would allow for handling lots of conditions: * Temporary failure, user is over quota * Permanent failure, user is over quote * Permanent failure, account does not exist * Permanent failure, account closed, please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead * Accepted * Accepted (by catchall) * Rejected, this account does not accept mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hopefully someone with some time on their hands will take this on. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vpopmail - virtual domains for qmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ QmailAdmin - web interface for Vpopmail: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ !DSPAM:475d7dd032002197873115!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 09:56 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007, at 6:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I
could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if
users
we're trying to deliver is overquota instead of bouncing it...
black lists
are nowadays becoming quite crazy IMHO but they're know
blacklisting this
servers who bounce overquota... well infact now all servers that
bounce
directly... it would be a nice idea to reject messages for overquoted
mailboxes...
I've proposed the following solution, a few times over the years, and
I still think it's a good one. It would fit your needs (and most
people's needs) well.
Someone needs to make a qmail-smtpd patch that calls an external
program to verify an account. That way, there's a single qmail-smtpd
patch and you can come up with whatever program (chkuser,
validrcptto, etc.) you want to verify an account.
You'd pass in the sender's address and the attempted recipient
address. The program can have different exit codes for different
conditions, and can even output a custom reject message. This would
allow for handling lots of conditions:
* Temporary failure, user is over quota
* Permanent failure, user is over quote
* Permanent failure, account does not exist
* Permanent failure, account closed, please use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead
* Accepted
* Accepted (by catchall)
* Rejected, this account does not accept mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hopefully someone with some time on their hands will take this on.
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the
basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's
already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat = CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what the parent
is looking for..
Rick
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vpopmail - virtual domains for qmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
QmailAdmin - web interface for Vpopmail: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/
!DSPAM:475d9b3732008013718122!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the
basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's
already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat = CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what the parent
is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but does
it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my test
server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure: user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did it
and I'm remembering wrong?
!DSPAM:475dc95932001899111700!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. snip Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. snip It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what the parent is looking for.. It should be improving soon. Antonio Nati has requested three new bits in gid_flags, and I plan to add them for the next release... as soon as I can find time. As I recall, two of them were quota related. Rick !DSPAM:475dd35b32004515697174!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(user_passwd-pw_shell)) \
= maxmbxquota_limit) {
retstat =
CHKUSER_ERR_MBXFULL;
}
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what
the parent is looking for..
Rick
I thought this used to work back in the days when we used CDB, but
does it still work today (using SQL at least?)
on my production it still generates a new bounce, as it does on my
test server...
Connected to fox.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fox ESMTP
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
blah
..
250 ok 1197328261 qp 12808
and yes david is well over quota :)
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: delivery 65: failure:
user_is_over_quota//
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: status: local 0/200 remote 0/200
Dec 11 09:11:06 fox qmail-send: bounce msg 131246 qp 12818
Chkusr accepts it like any other user found message...
Antonio perhaps I missed a config option to force this? (or has
it been so long since i needed to install it, it never actually did it
and I'm remembering wrong?
no matter, I found what I did wrong, I ommited the variable in tcp.smtp
file :)
it now works as stated.
But I agree it would be nice to do by default without adding into that
file if it is defined.
!DSPAM:475de0f732001316991813!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. snip Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. snip It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what the parent is looking for.. It should be improving soon. Antonio Nati has requested three new bits in gid_flags, and I plan to add them for the next release... One of the finest thing in vpopmail IMHO would be to set a list with wich each vpopmail is compatible with each courier-imap this is a bit difficult to see... and you have to do lots of tests... and if you set one vpopmail version with one courier-imap and with time one of them become buggy it's a problem to change one of them version... another thing would be nice too to correct would be that vpopmail not to let permanent connections against mysql because else if no one has poped in courier-imap for some time... courier-imap hangs because the connection he opened to mysql trough vpopmail is being closed because inactivity... congrats for so nice software :) as soon as I can find time. As I recall, two of them were quota related. Rick !DSPAM:475e387b32002078760001!
[vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing
Hi mates! I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if users we're trying to deliver is overquota instead of bouncing it... black lists are nowadays becoming quite crazy IMHO but they're know blacklisting this servers who bounce overquota... well infact now all servers that bounce directly... it would be a nice idea to reject messages for overquoted mailboxes... I have think doing an script that inserts and recreates validrcptto.cdb this way no mail will enter from outside... but authenticated users are able to bypass validrcptto... so will always be able to get that bounce... anyway IMHO this is not the most worring thing... the problem is mainly with outside servers and users... (not mine users...) as a little idea... does qmail-local do anything in wich I could enter a bash script any place wich does a remove the mail address from validrcptto.txt and latter rebuild validrcptto.cbd file for not accepting mail for overquota users? don't know exactly how to manage for this... any ideas?? !DSPAM:475bef3d32008762613590!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail Courier-Imap (authlib) and Vpopmail trouble
Hello everybody,
Currently I have a qmail, courier-imap, and vpopmail (mysql) setup
going (running under Gentoo on Xen) and I am having problems. Please
excuse me if this turns out to not be a vpopmail issue, but at this
point I believe that it is. I can't receive mail to my domain users
just fine, however nobody can smtp-auth to send mail out. The
following is what is showing up in my logs. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks.
Mar 16 04:43:20 zues vpopmail[19467]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login
success [EMAIL PROTECTED]:211.168.233.97
Mar 16 04:43:20 zues vpopmail[19467]: vchkpw-smtp: null user name
given :211.168.233.97
If it help the guide I have been using to try and get this setup
going is located at the following URI
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-382072.html
I have almost the same scenario here, running qmail, vpopmail courier under
XEN, but compiling from sources and not using from packages. And its on
Debian Etch, kernel 2.6.18-xen.
More strange, after install make install-strip and configure
courier-authlib to use authvchkpw, any user can login into POP and IMAP
services, but login not working with smtp-auth.
I simple do:
tar xzf vpopmail-5.4.25.tar.gz
cd vpopmail-5.4.25.tar.gz
./configure --enable-maildrop --enable-auth-module=mysql
--enable-mysql-limits --enable-valias --enable-qmail-ext
--enable-onchange-script --enable-incdir=/usr/include/mysql
--enable-libdir=/usr/lib/mysql
and...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/extra/src/vpopmail/vpopmail-5.4.25# ./vchkpw
Segmentation fault
I think is a vchkpw problem, as you can see, it's segfault.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/extra/src/vpopmail/vpopmail-5.4.25# gdb --quiet ./vchkpw
Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /extra/src/vpopmail/vpopmail-5.4.25/vchkpw
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47210544857744 (LWP 29940)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 47210544857744 (LWP 29940)]
0x2af00f501349 in strstr () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/extra/src/vpopmail/vpopmail-5.4.25# strace ./vchkpw
execve(./vchkpw, [./vchkpw], [/* 19 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x61b000
...
(QUOTE)
...
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [RTMIN RT_1], NULL, 8) = 0
getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=8192*1024, rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Process 29951 detached
My system is: uname -a
Linux devel 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Mon Dec 3 18:30:06 BRST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I got the same problem on x86_32 too. Always inside a PVM of XEN, out of
XEN, vchkpw works fine.
I do a workarround with my patched qmail (AUTH_CDB patch) from JMS qmail
patch, onchance script maintain a /var/qmail/control/auth.cdb in sync with
vpopmail user db, so I can login via smtp-auth with AUTH_CDB qmail patch.
But I'd like to see vchkpw working fine inside a virtual machine... :)
Regards,
Thiago Martins
!DSPAM:475b362632001244519970!
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Hi, Does anyone know of a qmail-inject patch to solve the problems im experiencing? Many thanks Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Matthew Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 November 2007 11:17 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Hi, They patch it for their greylisting solution, enabling it to do reverse DNS checks and how it handles RBLSMTPD connections, or maybe they used the Bill Shupp toaster version. :) Were is this patch? Cheers Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 November 2007 02:21 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, Yup they all have .qmail files. Qmail-inject has been recompiled a fair few times and has never fixed this issue even with completely new sources from Inter 7 themselves, unless you are talking a different type of fix? What patches does Inter7 have for qmail? The qmail-inject code for parsing To/Cc: headers chokes on stuff that other mta software accept without trouble. That code will have to be modified. regards, Christopher Cheers Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, I can see in my qmail send log - @4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/ Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted by one qmail server and passed on to this one thats throwing up the above error. qmail does not parse emails received via qmail-smtpd. In other words, qmail-inject tries to get addresses from headers whereas qmail-smtpd does not. Other emails seem to be going through ok. They do not have bad To: headers. I read somewhere
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Hi, They patch it for their greylisting solution, enabling it to do reverse DNS checks and how it handles RBLSMTPD connections, or maybe they used the Bill Shupp toaster version. :) Were is this patch? Cheers Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 November 2007 02:21 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, Yup they all have .qmail files. Qmail-inject has been recompiled a fair few times and has never fixed this issue even with completely new sources from Inter 7 themselves, unless you are talking a different type of fix? What patches does Inter7 have for qmail? The qmail-inject code for parsing To/Cc: headers chokes on stuff that other mta software accept without trouble. That code will have to be modified. regards, Christopher Cheers Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, I can see in my qmail send log - @4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/ Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted by one qmail server and passed on to this one thats throwing up the above error. qmail does not parse emails received via qmail-smtpd. In other words, qmail-inject tries to get addresses from headers whereas qmail-smtpd does not. Other emails seem to be going through ok. They do not have bad To: headers. I read somewhere a post from last year by Jeremy that VPOPMails vdelivermail should be calling qmail-queue and not qmail-inject. Maybe...does vdelivermail call qmail-local or does it handle dot-qmail files itself!?!? Somehow I do not think this has anything to do with vdelivermail... The emails for users stuck in the queue throwing up that error all have forwards on to outside domains. Any pointers? 'Fix' qmail-inject? These forwarding accounts all have their own dot-qmail file right? !DSPAM:4746b6b832004947816484!
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Hi, Yup they all have .qmail files. Qmail-inject has been recompiled a fair few times and has never fixed this issue even with completely new sources from Inter 7 themselves, unless you are talking a different type of fix? Cheers Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, I can see in my qmail send log - @4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/ Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted by one qmail server and passed on to this one thats throwing up the above error. qmail does not parse emails received via qmail-smtpd. In other words, qmail-inject tries to get addresses from headers whereas qmail-smtpd does not. Other emails seem to be going through ok. They do not have bad To: headers. I read somewhere a post from last year by Jeremy that VPOPMails vdelivermail should be calling qmail-queue and not qmail-inject. Maybe...does vdelivermail call qmail-local or does it handle dot-qmail files itself!?!? Somehow I do not think this has anything to do with vdelivermail... The emails for users stuck in the queue throwing up that error all have forwards on to outside domains. Any pointers? 'Fix' qmail-inject? These forwarding accounts all have their own dot-qmail file right? !DSPAM:4745759132001537613057!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, Yup they all have .qmail files. Qmail-inject has been recompiled a fair few times and has never fixed this issue even with completely new sources from Inter 7 themselves, unless you are talking a different type of fix? What patches does Inter7 have for qmail? The qmail-inject code for parsing To/Cc: headers chokes on stuff that other mta software accept without trouble. That code will have to be modified. regards, Christopher Cheers Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == -Original Message- From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, I can see in my qmail send log - @4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/ Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted by one qmail server and passed on to this one thats throwing up the above error. qmail does not parse emails received via qmail-smtpd. In other words, qmail-inject tries to get addresses from headers whereas qmail-smtpd does not. Other emails seem to be going through ok. They do not have bad To: headers. I read somewhere a post from last year by Jeremy that VPOPMails vdelivermail should be calling qmail-queue and not qmail-inject. Maybe...does vdelivermail call qmail-local or does it handle dot-qmail files itself!?!? Somehow I do not think this has anything to do with vdelivermail... The emails for users stuck in the queue throwing up that error all have forwards on to outside domains. Any pointers? 'Fix' qmail-inject? These forwarding accounts all have their own dot-qmail file right? !DSPAM:4746392932003816917612!
[vchkpw] Qmail errors
Hi, I can see in my qmail send log - @4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/ Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted by one qmail server and passed on to this one thats throwing up the above error. Other emails seem to be going through ok. I read somewhere a post from last year by Jeremy that VPOPMails vdelivermail should be calling qmail-queue and not qmail-inject. The emails for users stuck in the queue throwing up that error all have forwards on to outside domains. Any pointers? Many thanks Matt JPC InfoNet Limited Registered in England No.: 2983145 Registered Office: 2 St George's Works Silver Street Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 8AA t: +44 (0)1225 776 555 f: +44 (0)1225 774 299 Find us on the web at www.jpci.net - A Head Start for your business == The information transmitted in and/or with this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. == !DSPAM:4744c47a32001784331081!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote: Hi, I can see in my qmail send log – @4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/ Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted by one qmail server and passed on to this one thats throwing up the above error. qmail does not parse emails received via qmail-smtpd. In other words, qmail-inject tries to get addresses from headers whereas qmail-smtpd does not. Other emails seem to be going through ok. They do not have bad To: headers. I read somewhere a post from last year by Jeremy that VPOPMails vdelivermail should be calling qmail-queue and not qmail-inject. Maybe...does vdelivermail call qmail-local or does it handle dot-qmail files itself!?!? Somehow I do not think this has anything to do with vdelivermail... The emails for users stuck in the queue throwing up that error all have forwards on to outside domains. Any pointers? 'Fix' qmail-inject? These forwarding accounts all have their own dot-qmail file right? !DSPAM:4744eaba32008730539314!
[vchkpw] Qmail-scanner and manteinance
Hi! I have been reading about qmail-scanner manteinance (I didn't think it has lol) I only upgraded clamav when freshclam (that is launched once per hour) told old version upgrade engine... and that's the only thing I did with qmail-scanner maintenance... but have read that should too launch qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z... I don't never upgrade spamassassin and are the two things I launch in my qmail-scanner ... clamav and qmail-scanner... why should be launched qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z? don't undertand quite well that have read over there... that sais for upgrading perl-scanner database... what refers concretely with perl-scanner-database? and is it advised to do any other manteinante operation (other than qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z) ? Thanks a lot have a nice day !DSPAM:4733070e32004644915049!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
WOW your iowait state is WAY too high. Seems to me like you probably need to make some hard drive changes. What is your current drive configuration? Please be as specific as possible. If it helps, I'll describe my configuration: I'm using three RAID arrays. Two are RAID1 and one is RAID10, with one RAID1 and the RAID10 on an LSI MegaRAID SATA 300-X8 (six drives, 160GB SATA-II). The other RAID1 is a pair of 15,000 RPM Ultra 320 SCSI drives using linux software RAID1. The SATA RAID1 contains / The SATA RAID10 contains /usr/local/vpopmail/domains The SCSI RAID1 contains /tmp and some other working directories Here are my load numbers at the random moment I went and copied them. This can fluctuate anywhere from a little more heavily used than this, to 95% idle (for reference it's a dual 2Ghz Xeon): top - 12:49:26 up 138 days, 3:59, 1 user, load average: 2.31, 2.78, 2.30 Tasks: 238 total, 2 running, 233 sleeping, 0 stopped, 3 zombie Cpu0: 23.6% us, 15.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 58.0% id, 2.1% wa, 0.4% hi, 0.0% si Cpu1: 34.4% us, 10.5% sy, 0.0% ni, 54.2% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Cpu2: 25.4% us, 10.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 62.4% id, 1.4% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Cpu3: 17.3% us, 11.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 68.4% id, 2.3% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 2074860k total, 2043580k used,31280k free, 254412k buffers Swap: 4194296k total,38020k used, 4156276k free, 887628k cached --- - Nick Bright Network Administrator Terra World Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 Fax 620-332-1201 João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Nick. Thank you. When concurrent POP3 is low, the loadavg of my server is low too. My i/o is very high. Is normal? If any user to connect in POP3, Can he to start a attack to up my I/O? CPU states: cpuusernice systemirq softirq iowaitidle total 10,8%0,0%1,0% 0,0% 0,2% 84,8%2,9% cpu00 25,1%0,0%0,5% 0,0% 0,1% 74,0%0,0% cpu01 12,1%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,3% 86,4%0,0% cpu024,3%0,0%1,7% 0,0% 0,1% 87,8%5,7% cpu031,5%0,0%0,7% 0,0% 0,3% 91,2%5,9% Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Nick Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Rick, In SMTP Totals: Max Allow 14.2 kSMTP (1422.7%) Average Allow 8345.0 SMTP (834.5%) Current Allow 8694.0 SMTP (869.4%) Max Deny 11.4 kSMTP (1140.6%) Average Deny 6337.0 SMTP (633.7%) Current Deny 5181.0 SMTP (518.1%) What is Deny? Deny is rejected SMTP sessions, usually due to an RBL rejection but this can also be due to mailbox full or user not existing if you are using the CHKUSER patch. Is Deny high? That doesn't strike me as overly high, over the last 24 hours I've had: Max Allow 73.7 kSMTP (147.4%) Average Allow 36.5 kSMTP (73.0%) Current Allow 42.3 kSMTP (84.6%) Max Deny 54.2 kSMTP (108.4%) Average Deny 21.5 kSMTP (43.0%) Current Deny 30.4 kSMTP (60.9%) I wouldn't worry about the denies because they don't cause significant load - as long as you're rejecting their connections, you don't have the deal with the load of processing their mail. Do you want see others logs of qmailmrtg? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi, João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? qmailmrtg7 is a graphing tool for qmail/pop3/dnscache etc. You can find it at http://www.inter7.com When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 Are you running SA and Clam on the same machine ? Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. If that message is in the smtpd log, that's fine. You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Hope the above helps. Regards, Rick Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br
[vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform
Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao
Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform
João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao I am running qmail on two SunFire servers under FreeBSD 64 with no issues and wonderful performance. I'd try it. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform
Hi DAve, Thank you! Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao I am running qmail on two SunFire servers under FreeBSD 64 with no issues and wonderful performance. I'd try it. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 09/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5137 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Tren, Thank you! I´m testing the sysstat Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:51 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance -Original Message- From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:13 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Nick. Thank you. When concurrent POP3 is low, the loadavg of my server is low too. My i/o is very high. Is normal? If any user to connect in POP3, Can he to start a attack to up my I/O? CPU states: cpuusernice systemirq softirq iowait idle total 10,8%0,0%1,0% 0,0% 0,2% 84,8% 2,9% cpu00 25,1%0,0%0,5% 0,0% 0,1% 74,0% 0,0% cpu01 12,1%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,3% 86,4% 0,0% cpu024,3%0,0%1,7% 0,0% 0,1% 87,8% 5,7% cpu031,5%0,0%0,7% 0,0% 0,3% 91,2% 5,9% Regards, Joao How many hard drives are in this server? Are they in RAID at all? It's looking that most of your high load average is due to waiting on IO. This is solved by adding more drives to increase available IO bandwidth. You should become familiar with two utilities, vmstat and iostat. If you're using a redhat derived linux, install the sysstat rpm to gain access to iostat. Between these two utilities you should be able to figure out where your problems are coming from and how to resolve them. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5136 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Rick, Thank you. I installed qmailmrtg7. I don´t running SA and Clam when my server is slow. [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=no,spam=no,spam_passthru=no,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). How can I know if my qmail is to generate a new key for every encrypted connection? Is this? 01 01 * * * root /var/qmail/bin/dh_key 21 /dev/null You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). I use timeoutsmtpd with 60. Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi, João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? qmailmrtg7 is a graphing tool for qmail/pop3/dnscache etc. You can find it at http://www.inter7.com When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 Are you running SA and Clam on the same machine ? Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. If that message is in the smtpd log, that's fine. You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Hope the above helps. Regards, Rick Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Rick, In SMTP Totals: Max Allow 14.2 kSMTP (1422.7%) Average Allow 8345.0 SMTP (834.5%) Current Allow 8694.0 SMTP (869.4%) Max Deny 11.4 kSMTP (1140.6%) Average Deny 6337.0 SMTP (633.7%) Current Deny 5181.0 SMTP (518.1%) What is Deny? Is Deny high? Do you want see others logs of qmailmrtg? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi, João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? qmailmrtg7 is a graphing tool for qmail/pop3/dnscache etc. You can find it at http://www.inter7.com When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 Are you running SA and Clam on the same machine ? Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. If that message is in the smtpd log, that's fine. You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Hope the above helps. Regards, Rick Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
I had the same problems under high load on a similarly configured machine (2.0Ghz instead of 2.4Ghz, but other than that about the same). When I installed the external big todo patches it helped A LOT, but I still have some delay in delivery. However it is much more acceptable as messages can be delayed one to two minutes, instead of fifteen to twenty minutes. Usually things go through fairly instantly. The single best performance enhancer you could do would be the external todo patch, from my point of view. I also found that the chkuser patch also helped a LOT, I highly recommend using that patch as well. For reference, I'm not using Bill's toaster, but rather my own custom brew. Another load reducing method is to use a much faster anti-spam product, but you will most likely have to pay for that. I suggest MPPd (messagepartners.com) I've been using it for several years with the Cloudmark plugin and it is much more effective than spamassassin, with hundreds of times lower load on the system. --- - Nick Bright Network Administrator Terra World Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 Fax 620-332-1201 João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ begin:vcard fn:Nick Bright n:Bright;Nick org:Terra World Communications, LLC adr:Suite #11;;200 ARCO Place;Independence;KS;67301;USA email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Administrator tel;work:888-332-1616 tel;fax:620-332-1201 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://home.terraworld.net version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Rick, In SMTP Totals: Max Allow 14.2 kSMTP (1422.7%) Average Allow 8345.0 SMTP (834.5%) Current Allow 8694.0 SMTP (869.4%) Max Deny 11.4 kSMTP (1140.6%) Average Deny 6337.0 SMTP (633.7%) Current Deny 5181.0 SMTP (518.1%) What is Deny? Deny is rejected SMTP sessions, usually due to an RBL rejection but this can also be due to mailbox full or user not existing if you are using the CHKUSER patch. Is Deny high? That doesn't strike me as overly high, over the last 24 hours I've had: Max Allow 73.7 kSMTP (147.4%) Average Allow 36.5 kSMTP (73.0%) Current Allow 42.3 kSMTP (84.6%) Max Deny 54.2 kSMTP (108.4%) Average Deny 21.5 kSMTP (43.0%) Current Deny 30.4 kSMTP (60.9%) I wouldn't worry about the denies because they don't cause significant load - as long as you're rejecting their connections, you don't have the deal with the load of processing their mail. Do you want see others logs of qmailmrtg? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi, João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? qmailmrtg7 is a graphing tool for qmail/pop3/dnscache etc. You can find it at http://www.inter7.com When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 Are you running SA and Clam on the same machine ? Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. If that message is in the smtpd log, that's fine. You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Hope the above helps. Regards, Rick Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ begin:vcard fn:Nick Bright n:Bright;Nick org:Terra World Communications, LLC adr:Suite #11;;200 ARCO Place;Independence;KS;67301;USA email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Administrator tel;work:888-332-1616 tel;fax:620-332-1201 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://home.terraworld.net version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
I just wonder if anyone have tested Trend Micro for AV. I know it's a pay AV but just wonder.. Thanks Nick Bright wrote: I had the same problems under high load on a similarly configured machine (2.0Ghz instead of 2.4Ghz, but other than that about the same). When I installed the external big todo patches it helped A LOT, but I still have some delay in delivery. However it is much more acceptable as messages can be delayed one to two minutes, instead of fifteen to twenty minutes. Usually things go through fairly instantly. The single best performance enhancer you could do would be the external todo patch, from my point of view. I also found that the chkuser patch also helped a LOT, I highly recommend using that patch as well. For reference, I'm not using Bill's toaster, but rather my own custom brew. Another load reducing method is to use a much faster anti-spam product, but you will most likely have to pay for that. I suggest MPPd (messagepartners.com) I've been using it for several years with the Cloudmark plugin and it is much more effective than spamassassin, with hundreds of times lower load on the system. --- - Nick Bright Network Administrator Terra World Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 Fax 620-332-1201 João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ !DSPAM:470a8edd117907257416469!
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
are you using tcpserver ? how you are starting qmail ? Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 - Original Message - From: João Luiz - Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:01 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Itamar, I disable the spamassassin and clamav when my server is slow. Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance your load is very high you're using spamassassin ? Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 - Original Message - From: João Luiz - Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:09 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Itamar, I use tcpserver. The qmail is starting after reboot automatically. Is correct? Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance are you using tcpserver ? how you are starting qmail ? Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 - Original Message - From: João Luiz - Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:01 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Itamar, I disable the spamassassin and clamav when my server is slow. Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance your load is very high you're using spamassassin ? Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 - Original Message - From: João Luiz - Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:09 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5136 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Nick. Thank you. When concurrent POP3 is low, the loadavg of my server is low too. My i/o is very high. Is normal? If any user to connect in POP3, Can he to start a attack to up my I/O? CPU states: cpuusernice systemirq softirq iowaitidle total 10,8%0,0%1,0% 0,0% 0,2% 84,8%2,9% cpu00 25,1%0,0%0,5% 0,0% 0,1% 74,0%0,0% cpu01 12,1%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,3% 86,4%0,0% cpu024,3%0,0%1,7% 0,0% 0,1% 87,8%5,7% cpu031,5%0,0%0,7% 0,0% 0,3% 91,2%5,9% Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Nick Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Rick, In SMTP Totals: Max Allow 14.2 kSMTP (1422.7%) Average Allow 8345.0 SMTP (834.5%) Current Allow 8694.0 SMTP (869.4%) Max Deny 11.4 kSMTP (1140.6%) Average Deny 6337.0 SMTP (633.7%) Current Deny 5181.0 SMTP (518.1%) What is Deny? Deny is rejected SMTP sessions, usually due to an RBL rejection but this can also be due to mailbox full or user not existing if you are using the CHKUSER patch. Is Deny high? That doesn't strike me as overly high, over the last 24 hours I've had: Max Allow 73.7 kSMTP (147.4%) Average Allow 36.5 kSMTP (73.0%) Current Allow 42.3 kSMTP (84.6%) Max Deny 54.2 kSMTP (108.4%) Average Deny 21.5 kSMTP (43.0%) Current Deny 30.4 kSMTP (60.9%) I wouldn't worry about the denies because they don't cause significant load - as long as you're rejecting their connections, you don't have the deal with the load of processing their mail. Do you want see others logs of qmailmrtg? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi, João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? qmailmrtg7 is a graphing tool for qmail/pop3/dnscache etc. You can find it at http://www.inter7.com When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 Are you running SA and Clam on the same machine ? Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. If that message is in the smtpd log, that's fine. You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Hope the above helps. Regards, Rick Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5136 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
-Original Message- From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:13 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Nick. Thank you. When concurrent POP3 is low, the loadavg of my server is low too. My i/o is very high. Is normal? If any user to connect in POP3, Can he to start a attack to up my I/O? CPU states: cpuusernice systemirq softirq iowait idle total 10,8%0,0%1,0% 0,0% 0,2% 84,8% 2,9% cpu00 25,1%0,0%0,5% 0,0% 0,1% 74,0% 0,0% cpu01 12,1%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,3% 86,4% 0,0% cpu024,3%0,0%1,7% 0,0% 0,1% 87,8% 5,7% cpu031,5%0,0%0,7% 0,0% 0,3% 91,2% 5,9% Regards, Joao How many hard drives are in this server? Are they in RAID at all? It's looking that most of your high load average is due to waiting on IO. This is solved by adding more drives to increase available IO bandwidth. You should become familiar with two utilities, vmstat and iostat. If you're using a redhat derived linux, install the sysstat rpm to gain access to iostat. Between these two utilities you should be able to figure out where your problems are coming from and how to resolve them. Regards, Tren
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
The single best performance enhancer you could do would be the external todo patch, from my point of view. Depends on the filesystem. If the filesystem has indexed directory support, ext-todo should be sufficient. Otherwise, you need the big-ext-todo patch.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Itamar, I disable the spamassassin and clamav when my server is slow. Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance your load is very high you're using spamassassin ? Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 - Original Message - From: João Luiz - Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:09 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/ Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi, João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? qmailmrtg7 is a graphing tool for qmail/pop3/dnscache etc. You can find it at http://www.inter7.com When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 Are you running SA and Clam on the same machine ? Also, are you running the update_tmprsadh nightly (if your not it has to generate a new key for every encrypted connection). I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. If that message is in the smtpd log, that's fine. You may also want to look at decreasing your timeoutsmtpd, put 180 or something similar in /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd to change the default of 7200 (this will stop the spam zombie who hang around just using up a connection slot). My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Hope the above helps. Regards, Rick
[vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( Thank you Joao
RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
your load is very high you're using spamassassin ? Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 - Original Message - From: João Luiz - Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:09 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Tren, Sorry. My english is not good :). My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb. I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many connections POP3 and SMTP. I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of POP3 and connections with my SMTP (RBL, no delivery, ...). Exists any software to analyze POP3 and SMTP log? When my server is slow, I have: SMTP concurrent: 40 - 50 POP3 concurrent: 20 - 30 Load Average: 30 - 40 I have many SMTP connections with not existing recipient. My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is very slow. How can I identify a possible attack? Thank you Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hi Joao; From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance Hello, I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Is it the better performance instalation? My server is very slowly :( You'll need to give something specific here. Bill Shupps Toaster is widely popular. I use it myself and have no issues with performance. What are the specifications of the hardware you've implemented it on. What specifically is performing slow? Is there anything else on this server? Approximately how many mailboxes are housed on this server? How many deliveries per second/minute/hour/day (whatever is easiest to convey) and do you have any idea what your peak concurrent deliveries are? You need to provide as much information as possible before asking such a general question. Regards, Tren Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/10/2007 / Versão: 5.1.00/5135 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
