Re: [vdr] FRC - RGB/Scart with the Intel 830 driver

2009-09-09 Thread dave cunningham

In message 20090909185925.ga24...@roja.toh.cx, Thomas Hilber wrote


On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:08:39PM +0100, dave cunningham wrote:

Same behaviour with your xorg.conf unfortunately.


I've heard there are some buggy intel-DDXes floating around.
I don't know which one you use. A possible workaround is
do add

SubSection Display
Virtual3200 1200
EndSubSection

to the Screen section. Attached is a further 'xorg.conf'
with the workaround included. Please give it a try.



I added this section but it didn't make any difference.

I have now fixed it though by adding a new monitor for VGA-1 and setting 
Ignore to true in xorg.conf.


Thanks again for the help (wouldn't have found this if I hadn't started 
looking into Clone as you mentioned earlier in the thread!)

--
Dave Cunningham  dave at upsilon org uk
 PGP KEY ID: 0xA78636DC


xorg.conf
Description: xorg.conf
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] FRC - RGB/Scart with the Intel 830 driver

2009-09-08 Thread dave cunningham
In message 20090908042705.gh6...@roja.toh.cx, Thomas Hilber wrote

 The desktop's working just fine but I'm having problems with XV. When
 running in a window xv's fine however when I switch to full screen all I
 get is a blue screen + audio.

probably a xorg.conf configuration issue. Did you use clone mode?
That does not work with interlaced timings. Symptoms are like
the ones you describe.
Attached is a working sample for xorg.conf I use for my D945GCLF2.

Same behaviour with your xorg.conf unfortunately.


I get the following with xrandr -q

Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1440 x 576, maximum 1600 x 1600
VGA connected 1440x576+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
axis) 0mm x 0mm
   1440x576_50i   25.1*+
   1600x1200_60   59.9
   1368x768_6060.0
   1280x800   60.0
   1280x768   60.0
   1024x768   60.0
   800x60060.3
   800x520_50i25.0
   720x576_50i25.0
   640x48059.9
VGA-1 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
   1280x800   60.0
   1280x768   60.0
   1024x768   60.0
   800x60060.3
   640x48059.9

Bit confused as to where VGA-1 is coming from. Presumably this could be
the source of the problem?

xrandr --output VGA-1 --off

appears to have no affect.

-- 
Dave Cunningham  dave at upsilon org uk
 PGP KEY ID: 0xA78636DC

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] FRC - RGB/Scart with the Intel 830 driver

2009-09-07 Thread dave cunningham
In message lkpgcrborzpkf...@echelon.upsilon.org.uk, dave cunningham 
wrote




Looking for some help again :(

I've finally tried to get this up and running with the patched Intel 
xserver on a D945GCLF2 atom board (I see from your readme that you've 
tried this configuration so assume it should work).


(Note I'm using MPlayer right now and not xine/vdr).

The desktop's working just fine but I'm having problems with XV. When 
running in a window xv's fine however when I switch to full screen all 
I get is a blue screen + audio.


I've done a lot of googling / messing with xserver options / xv overlay 
ports but I'm no further forward yet!




An addendum...

When running in non-interlaced mode with my normal monitor (1280*1024) 
rather than the TV xv works fine in full screen mode. (Incidentally I 
note the readme for the xserver says that the driver doesn't support 
interlaced mode though I guess that's what patch changed).


--
Dave Cunningham  dave at upsilon org uk
 PGP KEY ID: 0xA78636DC

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] FRC - RGB/Scart with the Intel 830 driver

2009-08-27 Thread dave cunningham

Thomas Hilber wrote:

snip

 The 1440x576i is driven at doubled dot clock. So it effectively represents
 a regular 720x576i PAL timing too. The reason for 1440x576i is: the FRC
 gains doubled horizontal timing resolution. As a result variable frame
 rate can be controlled in finer (twice as much) increments.


Do standard CRTs handle this increased resolution/clock? I've never tried
driving this signal into my TV.

In fact I use the cable from here
http://members.optusnet.com.au/eviltim/scart.htm with the cut off
circuit so I'd actually have to build a new cable to use this resolution.

Not that that's particularly difficult but do you gain any advantage using
the higher resolution on the Intel cards vs standard 576i with ATI. If not
then I'll probably just save the hassle and buy an ATI card of eBay
instead.

-- 
Dave Cunningham  PGP KEY ID: 0xA78636DC


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] FRC - RGB/Scart with the Intel 830 driver

2009-08-26 Thread dave cunningham
Question for Thomas I guess...

I'm in the process of setting up a PVR and just came across the FRC
project which looks very interesting!

One query I have though is the re. the restriction on the resolutions
available.

If I'm reading the patches correctly it seems that the ATI chips can
currently do 720x576 only, where the Intel chips can be configured for
1440x576 and 1600x1200 only.

The Intel driver has been patched to allow a 12MHz dot clock - is it in
fact capable of supporting 720x576 interlaced? If so is there a hardware
limitation preventing the FRC syncing working at this resolution?

(I ask as I'm planning to use a Mini-ITX Atom board with a GMA950 to be
hooked up to a standard-def TV. It would be good if I could use the
onboard video and leave the PCI slot free.)

Thanks
-- 
Dave Cunningham  PGP KEY ID: 0xA78636DC


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr