Re: [Veritas-bu] bpmedialist media missing after upgraded to NBU 6.0 MP4
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/vmglob -get_gdbhost return my master server name - Original Message - From: Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: veritas-bu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] bpmedialist media missing after upgraded to NBU 6.0 MP4 On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin wrote Are your images still under /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/* for the clients you rememeber being backed up? Did you have any errors during the nbpushdata -add? Thanks and replied to Justin Yes, my images still in /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/* for the clients, that is why I can restore data. But the volume is missing in #bpmedialist -h mediaserver1 and I realized my data volume was used for subsequent backup which overwritten as new tape Blaine Robison wrote The media lists are all on the EMM server now. Try running bpmedialist on the EMM server. Thanks and replied to Robison Yes, we run #bpmedialist -h mediaserver1 on EMM server, it only show the latest backup volumes after the upgraded of this media server to 6.0, those volumes before the upgrade all missing. We had ran nbpushdata successfully on master server before we proceed to upgrade this mediaserver1 We have tried the #nbpushdata -add again on this mediaserver1 again mediaserver1#nbpushdata -add failed with error - no global device database hostname found in the EMM database - nbpushdata must be run on the global device db host first (??? ALREADY DONE) - emm gdb host = - local host gdb host = masterservername (which is the EMM server as well) - error emm db recond no found (194) - nbpushdata must be run on the global device db host first (??? ALREADY DONE) You need to run nbpushdata -add on the master server first!!! What does /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/vmglob -get_gdbhost say? Does that return your master server name? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] VMD Core Dump
Morning all 5.1 MP5 This morning we had vmd core dump, which in turn filled up the root file system. It was easy enough to get everything back to working order however we would one begin to investigate why this happened. I have checked all the obvious suspects . i.e bperror problems, var/adm/messages etc, but haven't found much in any clues ? Anyone got any suggestions? Thanks Dave Notice to recipient: The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity. If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
Hi, anyone having both VTL and DSU in your backup environment? or anyone here did a compare between the both? I just need to know the Veritas Licenses cost for VTL and DSU if i want to implement a 20TB Disk Storage. Thanks +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0MP4 media server in cluster (VCS)
Selwyn, We have two sunfire, PhysA PhysB. cluster framwork is using those two machines. We have created a vcs ressource group, Logical which acts as media server. The nbemmcmd -listhost gives the following output master Master media Master app_cluster Logical cluster Logical media PhysA media PhysB All the STUs have PhysA or PhysB as media server. images are automatically assigned to Logical. When trying a restore, I receive an error 800 : host is unknown in EMM. Would it be possible to have your output of the nbemmcmd -listhost and tpconfig -d ? TIA, Greg On 9/8/07, selwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forget using the device wizards, they just make a mess of the configuration. We are running Netbackup 6.0 MP4 on Solaris 10. I set up all of the tape drives using tpconfig. I created a script that reads a map file to create the tape devices. I kept the device paths matched between both servers in the cluster--though that does not appear to be necessary for the system to work. I do not understand what you mean by physical names. I do not use the names of the drives at all when I set up storage units. Can you elaborate? We have had no problems with restores. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- Gregory DEMILDE Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GSM : +352 691 915620 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions?
I've been getting Status 57s on a host since we added it to the NBU environment. Here's the setup: Master server: Windows2K3, SP2 with NBU 6.0MP4 Client: Windows2K3 Enterprise, R2 SP2 with 6.0MP4 client Anytime a backup is initiated, it ends with a 57. Looking at the BPCD logs, here's what I see: 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 logconnections: BPCD ACCEPT FROM 192.168.64.169.1952 TO 192.168.64.206.13724 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: setup_sockopts complete 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd peer_hostname: Connection from host master.longwood.edu (192.168.64.169) port 1952 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd valid_server: comparing master and master.longwood.edu 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd valid_server: hostname comparison succeeded 10:31:38.708 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: output socket port number = 1 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Duplicated vnetd socket on stderr 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: NetBackup 6.0 0 initiated 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Not using VxSS authentication with master.longwood.edu 10:31:39.177 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_NB_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_BE_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Backup Exec Config key not found. 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.942 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:40.271 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_READ_HOST_CONFIG_RQST 10:31:40.880 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:41.114 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PRIVILEGES_RQST 10:31:41.427 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PLATFORM_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_UNAME_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_SYSNAME = WindowsNET 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_NODENAME = CLIENT1 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_RELEASE = 5 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_VERSION = 2 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_MACHINE = Intel x86 - Unknown - Revision x403 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: END 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_DISCONNECT_RQST 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd exit_bpcd: exit status ---exiting By this, I can't see that it fails. Is it dumping to another service and failing there? The only other thing I have logging is bpbkar and vnetd, and there's nothing there. I've retried with loglevel at 5, but still nothing. The firewall isn't turned on on the client, so I'm at a loss. Suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions?
Run bpclntcmd -pn on the client. I would suspect that the client can't resolve the master. Can you view the host properties via the GUI? Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:15 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? I've been getting Status 57s on a host since we added it to the NBU environment. Here's the setup: Master server: Windows2K3, SP2 with NBU 6.0MP4 Client: Windows2K3 Enterprise, R2 SP2 with 6.0MP4 client Anytime a backup is initiated, it ends with a 57. Looking at the BPCD logs, here's what I see: 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 logconnections: BPCD ACCEPT FROM 192.168.64.169.1952 TO 192.168.64.206.13724 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: setup_sockopts complete 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd peer_hostname: Connection from host master.longwood.edu (192.168.64.169) port 1952 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd valid_server: comparing master and master.longwood.edu 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd valid_server: hostname comparison succeeded 10:31:38.708 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: output socket port number = 1 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Duplicated vnetd socket on stderr 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: NetBackup 6.0 0 initiated 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Not using VxSS authentication with master.longwood.edu 10:31:39.177 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_NB_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_BE_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Backup Exec Config key not found. 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.942 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:40.271 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_READ_HOST_CONFIG_RQST 10:31:40.880 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:41.114 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PRIVILEGES_RQST 10:31:41.427 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PLATFORM_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_UNAME_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_SYSNAME = WindowsNET 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_NODENAME = CLIENT1 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_RELEASE = 5 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_VERSION = 2 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_MACHINE = Intel x86 - Unknown - Revision x403 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: END 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_DISCONNECT_RQST 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd exit_bpcd: exit status ---exiting By this, I can't see that it fails. Is it dumping to another service and failing there? The only other thing I have logging is bpbkar and vnetd, and there's nothing there. I've retried with loglevel at 5, but still nothing. The firewall isn't turned on on the client, so I'm at a loss. Suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions?
Did You try running bptestbpcd to determine if the ports were open? --- Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've ran that with success. The host can resolve the master and they're on the same subnet. For the Windows folks, the client is in a child domain of the master. None of the troubleshooting steps for the 57s have produced anything - i.e., all the steps have succeeded. That's why I'm wondering about the next step, which I thought was bpbkar, but produced no logs at all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:22 AM To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? Run bpclntcmd -pn on the client. I would suspect that the client can't resolve the master. Can you view the host properties via the GUI? Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:15 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? I've been getting Status 57s on a host since we added it to the NBU environment. Here's the setup: Master server: Windows2K3, SP2 with NBU 6.0MP4 Client: Windows2K3 Enterprise, R2 SP2 with 6.0MP4 client Anytime a backup is initiated, it ends with a 57. Looking at the BPCD logs, here's what I see: 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 logconnections: BPCD ACCEPT FROM 192.168.64.169.1952 TO 192.168.64.206.13724 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: setup_sockopts complete 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd peer_hostname: Connection from host master.longwood.edu (192.168.64.169) port 1952 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd valid_server: comparing master and master.longwood.edu 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd valid_server: hostname comparison succeeded 10:31:38.708 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: output socket port number = 1 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Duplicated vnetd socket on stderr 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: NetBackup 6.0 0 initiated 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Not using VxSS authentication with master.longwood.edu 10:31:39.177 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_NB_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_BE_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Backup Exec Config key not found. 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.942 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:40.271 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_READ_HOST_CONFIG_RQST 10:31:40.880 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:41.114 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PRIVILEGES_RQST 10:31:41.427 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PLATFORM_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_UNAME_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_SYSNAME = WindowsNET 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_NODENAME = CLIENT1 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_RELEASE = 5 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_VERSION = 2 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_MACHINE = Intel x86 - Unknown - Revision x403 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: END 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_DISCONNECT_RQST 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd exit_bpcd: exit status ---exiting By this, I can't see that it fails. Is it dumping to another service and failing there? The only other thing I have logging is bpbkar and vnetd, and there's nothing there. I've retried with loglevel at 5, but still nothing. The firewall isn't turned on on the client, so I'm at a loss. Suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu Blaine Robison Solaris Ceritfied System Administrator Solaris Certified Network Administrator Veritas Certified Professional 972-853-2459 214-578-5391 Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions?
Jason, Also, make sure the source IP address of the client is recognizable by the master. I have seen in some cases where a multi-home hosts is routing BP traffic from an interface not recognized by the master What about a tool similar to tcpdump, or snoop to examine your traffic? Thanks, Chris Hall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blaine Robison Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:03 PM To: Brooks, Jason; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? Did You try running bptestbpcd to determine if the ports were open? --- Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've ran that with success. The host can resolve the master and they're on the same subnet. For the Windows folks, the client is in a child domain of the master. None of the troubleshooting steps for the 57s have produced anything - i.e., all the steps have succeeded. That's why I'm wondering about the next step, which I thought was bpbkar, but produced no logs at all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:22 AM To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? Run bpclntcmd -pn on the client. I would suspect that the client can't resolve the master. Can you view the host properties via the GUI? Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:15 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? I've been getting Status 57s on a host since we added it to the NBU environment. Here's the setup: Master server: Windows2K3, SP2 with NBU 6.0MP4 Client: Windows2K3 Enterprise, R2 SP2 with 6.0MP4 client Anytime a backup is initiated, it ends with a 57. Looking at the BPCD logs, here's what I see: 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 logconnections: BPCD ACCEPT FROM 192.168.64.169.1952 TO 192.168.64.206.13724 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: setup_sockopts complete 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd peer_hostname: Connection from host master.longwood.edu (192.168.64.169) port 1952 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd valid_server: comparing master and master.longwood.edu 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd valid_server: hostname comparison succeeded 10:31:38.708 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: output socket port number = 1 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Duplicated vnetd socket on stderr 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: NetBackup 6.0 0 initiated 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Not using VxSS authentication with master.longwood.edu 10:31:39.177 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_NB_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_BE_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Backup Exec Config key not found. 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.942 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:40.271 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_READ_HOST_CONFIG_RQST 10:31:40.880 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:41.114 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PRIVILEGES_RQST 10:31:41.427 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PLATFORM_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_UNAME_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_SYSNAME = WindowsNET 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_NODENAME = CLIENT1 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_RELEASE = 5 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_VERSION = 2 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_MACHINE = Intel x86 - Unknown - Revision x403 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: END 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_DISCONNECT_RQST 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd exit_bpcd: exit status ---exiting By this, I can't see that it fails. Is it dumping to another service and failing there? The only other thing I have logging is bpbkar and vnetd, and there's nothing there. I've retried with loglevel at 5, but still nothing. The firewall isn't turned on on the client, so I'm at a loss. Suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions?
I assume from your email that the master is also the media server. Have you tried telnet client | master bpcd from both ends. If you run bpgetconfig -M client from the master what are the results? If the master is not the media server can the client see it and vise versa? Regards, Patrick Whelan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: 10 September 2007 16:15 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? I've been getting Status 57s on a host since we added it to the NBU environment. Here's the setup: Master server: Windows2K3, SP2 with NBU 6.0MP4 Client: Windows2K3 Enterprise, R2 SP2 with 6.0MP4 client Anytime a backup is initiated, it ends with a 57. Looking at the BPCD logs, here's what I see: 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 logconnections: BPCD ACCEPT FROM 192.168.64.169.1952 TO 192.168.64.206.13724 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: setup_sockopts complete 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd peer_hostname: Connection from host master.longwood.edu (192.168.64.169) port 1952 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd valid_server: comparing master and master.longwood.edu 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd valid_server: hostname comparison succeeded 10:31:38.708 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: output socket port number = 1 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Duplicated vnetd socket on stderr 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: NetBackup 6.0 0 initiated 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Not using VxSS authentication with master.longwood.edu 10:31:39.177 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_NB_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_BE_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Backup Exec Config key not found. 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.942 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:40.271 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_READ_HOST_CONFIG_RQST 10:31:40.880 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:41.114 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PRIVILEGES_RQST 10:31:41.427 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PLATFORM_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_UNAME_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_SYSNAME = WindowsNET 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_NODENAME = CLIENT1 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_RELEASE = 5 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_VERSION = 2 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_MACHINE = Intel x86 - Unknown - Revision x403 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: END 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_DISCONNECT_RQST 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd exit_bpcd: exit status ---exiting By this, I can't see that it fails. Is it dumping to another service and failing there? The only other thing I have logging is bpbkar and vnetd, and there's nothing there. I've retried with loglevel at 5, but still nothing. The firewall isn't turned on on the client, so I'm at a loss. Suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions?
The master is the media server. Bpgetconfig -M master dumps the config. Was there anything particular that I should look for? I can telnet from client to master on bpcd fine, and vice versa. Reinstall client? That's about where I'm at now. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:41 PM To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? I assume from your email that the master is also the media server. Have you tried telnet client | master bpcd from both ends. If you run bpgetconfig -M client from the master what are the results? If the master is not the media server can the client see it and vise versa? Regards, Patrick Whelan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: 10 September 2007 16:15 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 57 - Resolutions? I've been getting Status 57s on a host since we added it to the NBU environment. Here's the setup: Master server: Windows2K3, SP2 with NBU 6.0MP4 Client: Windows2K3 Enterprise, R2 SP2 with 6.0MP4 client Anytime a backup is initiated, it ends with a 57. Looking at the BPCD logs, here's what I see: 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 logconnections: BPCD ACCEPT FROM 192.168.64.169.1952 TO 192.168.64.206.13724 10:31:38.505 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: setup_sockopts complete 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd peer_hostname: Connection from host master.longwood.edu (192.168.64.169) port 1952 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd valid_server: comparing master and master.longwood.edu 10:31:38.521 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd valid_server: hostname comparison succeeded 10:31:38.708 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: output socket port number = 1 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Duplicated vnetd socket on stderr 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: NetBackup 6.0 0 initiated 10:31:39.021 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: Not using VxSS authentication with master.longwood.edu 10:31:39.177 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_NB_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.458 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_BE_VERSION_RQST 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Backup Exec Config key not found. 10:31:39.677 [3152.1472] 4 bpcd main: Version string is NetBackup 6.0 60C:\ProgramFiles\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin 10:31:39.942 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:40.271 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_READ_HOST_CONFIG_RQST 10:31:40.880 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_VERSION_RQST 10:31:41.114 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PRIVILEGES_RQST 10:31:41.427 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_PLATFORM_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_GET_UNAME_RQST 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_SYSNAME = WindowsNET 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_NODENAME = CLIENT1 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_RELEASE = 5 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_VERSION = 2 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: UNAME_MACHINE = Intel x86 - Unknown - Revision x403 10:31:41.755 [3152.1472] 2 getUnameInfo: END 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd main: BPCD_DISCONNECT_RQST 10:31:41.989 [3152.1472] 2 bpcd exit_bpcd: exit status ---exiting By this, I can't see that it fails. Is it dumping to another service and failing there? The only other thing I have logging is bpbkar and vnetd, and there's nothing there. I've retried with loglevel at 5, but still nothing. The firewall isn't turned on on the client, so I'm at a loss. Suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Re: command to extract Activity Monitor Detailed Statusqu
Is that really true? Seems like a huge lacuna in NBU command-line functionality! Anybody have a workaround? Karl Darren Dunham wrote: [stuffa deleta] The main problem (for me) is that there is no direct connection in any of the databases between a job and an image. You can make the connection yourself based on job start time, client, and other info. If you have an image, all the other tools can be used. But only bpdbjobs can give you job info, and only until that job disappears from the job database. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot. So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the setup. Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Horalek Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:34 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU 6.5 uses a sliding capacity model. 1-20TB would be priced about same per TB. Above 20TB the discount gets greater. Under Traditonal Model 6.5 $995 List per TB Usable Capacity NBU for VTL (VTO) $0 DSU Free $995 List DSU per TB with NetBackup Flexible Disk Option(FDO) (Advanced Disk and SharedDisk) Enterprise Model 6.5 $11,995 List per FE Terabytes includes Vault,SSO,FDO,VTO,OSO,NAS Snapvault,NDMP) Most every thing you will ever need. FE Front End, basically the total of all your fulls. Minus all copies of redundant data. Netbackup 6.0 $1000 per TB VTL Can't do NDMP to a DSU as far as I know. Need Tape or VTL for NDMP. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dy018 Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 2:45 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU Hi, anyone having both VTL and DSU in your backup environment? or anyone here did a compare between the both? I just need to know the Veritas Licenses cost for VTL and DSU if i want to implement a 20TB Disk Storage. Thanks +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. Forward SPAM |to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
This depends on your license. We pay per tape drive, and you (apparantly) pay a flat rate regardless of how many drives you have. So, if your license is such that you are paying per drive, then there may be a considerable difference between the licensing per drive, vs per terabyte of usable storage, versus DSU (free?) Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: September 10, 2007 3:18 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot. So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the setup. Kevin La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
True, we do not have a limit to the number of tape drives. -Original Message- From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:25 PM To: Kevin Whittaker; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU This depends on your license. We pay per tape drive, and you (apparantly) pay a flat rate regardless of how many drives you have. So, if your license is such that you are paying per drive, then there may be a considerable difference between the licensing per drive, vs per terabyte of usable storage, versus DSU (free?) Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: September 10, 2007 3:18 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot. So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the setup. Kevin La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
That's the opposite of what our Symantec rep and resellers told us. We're getting 2 EDL4400s and are paying by the TB. Not sure why Symantec feels they're entitled to it, I think maybe Symantec has hired some former RIAA execs. Jack L. Forester, Jr. UNIX Systems Administrator, Stf Lockheed Martin Information Technology (304) 625-3946 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:18 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot. So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the setup. Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Horalek Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:34 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU 6.5 uses a sliding capacity model. 1-20TB would be priced about same per TB. Above 20TB the discount gets greater. Under Traditonal Model 6.5 $995 List per TB Usable Capacity NBU for VTL (VTO) $0 DSU Free $995 List DSU per TB with NetBackup Flexible Disk Option(FDO) (Advanced Disk and SharedDisk) Enterprise Model 6.5 $11,995 List per FE Terabytes includes Vault,SSO,FDO,VTO,OSO,NAS Snapvault,NDMP) Most every thing you will ever need. FE Front End, basically the total of all your fulls. Minus all copies of redundant data. Netbackup 6.0 $1000 per TB VTL Can't do NDMP to a DSU as far as I know. Need Tape or VTL for NDMP. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dy018 Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 2:45 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU Hi, anyone having both VTL and DSU in your backup environment? or anyone here did a compare between the both? I just need to know the Veritas Licenses cost for VTL and DSU if i want to implement a 20TB Disk Storage. Thanks +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. Forward SPAM |to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
Your sales rep is saying the right thing (pay per TB) and the other sales rep is off base (pay per drive). I'm also saying don't shoot the messenger, but any sales rep who is saying that a 6.x drive-based license is valid for a VTL obviously hasn't read the licensing guide. This is what happens when you have a 50-page+ pricing schema. --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Forester, Jack L Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:54 PM To: Kevin Whittaker; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU That's the opposite of what our Symantec rep and resellers told us. We're getting 2 EDL4400s and are paying by the TB. Not sure why Symantec feels they're entitled to it, I think maybe Symantec has hired some former RIAA execs. Jack L. Forester, Jr. UNIX Systems Administrator, Stf Lockheed Martin Information Technology (304) 625-3946 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:18 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot. So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the setup. Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Horalek Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:34 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU 6.5 uses a sliding capacity model. 1-20TB would be priced about same per TB. Above 20TB the discount gets greater. Under Traditonal Model 6.5 $995 List per TB Usable Capacity NBU for VTL (VTO) $0 DSU Free $995 List DSU per TB with NetBackup Flexible Disk Option(FDO) (Advanced Disk and SharedDisk) Enterprise Model 6.5 $11,995 List per FE Terabytes includes Vault,SSO,FDO,VTO,OSO,NAS Snapvault,NDMP) Most every thing you will ever need. FE Front End, basically the total of all your fulls. Minus all copies of redundant data. Netbackup 6.0 $1000 per TB VTL Can't do NDMP to a DSU as far as I know. Need Tape or VTL for NDMP. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dy018 Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 2:45 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU Hi, anyone having both VTL and DSU in your backup environment? or anyone here did a compare between the both? I just need to know the Veritas Licenses cost for VTL and DSU if i want to implement a 20TB Disk Storage. Thanks +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. Forward SPAM |to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
So, the way I read this is that since you're going to want the advanced stuff (as it's really cool), there is no longer ANY licensing pricing advantage of DSUs over VTLs. When you add de-dupe to this, a VTL is far cheaper now if it offers de-dupe, even when you consider Symantec licensing. --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Horalek Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 10:34 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU 6.5 uses a sliding capacity model. 1-20TB would be priced about same per TB. Above 20TB the discount gets greater. Under Traditonal Model 6.5 $995 List per TB Usable Capacity NBU for VTL (VTO) $0 DSU Free $995 List DSU per TB with NetBackup Flexible Disk Option(FDO) (Advanced Disk and SharedDisk) Enterprise Model 6.5 $11,995 List per FE Terabytes includes Vault,SSO,FDO,VTO,OSO,NAS Snapvault,NDMP) Most every thing you will ever need. FE Front End, basically the total of all your fulls. Minus all copies of redundant data. Netbackup 6.0 $1000 per TB VTL Can't do NDMP to a DSU as far as I know. Need Tape or VTL for NDMP. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dy018 Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 2:45 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU Hi, anyone having both VTL and DSU in your backup environment? or anyone here did a compare between the both? I just need to know the Veritas Licenses cost for VTL and DSU if i want to implement a 20TB Disk Storage. Thanks +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. Forward SPAM |to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
Anyone here using a 10gigabit VTL/DSU unit? On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Curtis Preston wrote: Your sales rep is saying the right thing (pay per TB) and the other sales rep is off base (pay per drive). I'm also saying don't shoot the messenger, but any sales rep who is saying that a 6.x drive-based license is valid for a VTL obviously hasn't read the licensing guide. This is what happens when you have a 50-page+ pricing schema. --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Forester, Jack L Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:54 PM To: Kevin Whittaker; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU That's the opposite of what our Symantec rep and resellers told us. We're getting 2 EDL4400s and are paying by the TB. Not sure why Symantec feels they're entitled to it, I think maybe Symantec has hired some former RIAA execs. Jack L. Forester, Jr. UNIX Systems Administrator, Stf Lockheed Martin Information Technology (304) 625-3946 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:18 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot. So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the setup. Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Horalek Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:34 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU 6.5 uses a sliding capacity model. 1-20TB would be priced about same per TB. Above 20TB the discount gets greater. Under Traditonal Model 6.5 $995 List per TB Usable Capacity NBU for VTL (VTO) $0 DSU Free $995 List DSU per TB with NetBackup Flexible Disk Option(FDO) (Advanced Disk and SharedDisk) Enterprise Model 6.5 $11,995 List per FE Terabytes includes Vault,SSO,FDO,VTO,OSO,NAS Snapvault,NDMP) Most every thing you will ever need. FE Front End, basically the total of all your fulls. Minus all copies of redundant data. Netbackup 6.0 $1000 per TB VTL Can't do NDMP to a DSU as far as I know. Need Tape or VTL for NDMP. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dy018 Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 2:45 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU Hi, anyone having both VTL and DSU in your backup environment? or anyone here did a compare between the both? I just need to know the Veritas Licenses cost for VTL and DSU if i want to implement a 20TB Disk Storage. Thanks +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. Forward SPAM |to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
