Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now and again when they use Kaleidoscope. Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye rowen...@gmail.com wrote: I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. Rob On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I remember it has a Compare with option on a per file bases. Exactly what we need in Versions... On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? Thanks, - Dirk On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than Sofa itself... http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor quinntay...@mac.com wrote: Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support - Quinn On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team response it won't be in the future either... On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor quinntay...@mac.com wrote: It's true, no merge on the feature list. http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. - Quinn On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it now. On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: *cough* On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' filemerge. How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff viewer from the interface in Versions? Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... Kindest regards, Marijn smime.p7s 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to
Congrats, Versions team
1.1 looks like a solid release with needed fixes and good new features. Thanks for continuing the development of Versions! For those who haven't seen it yet, here are the release notes:http://versionsapp.com/releasenotes Cheers, Joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hi Dirk, I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and your argumentation. If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not want to use a GUI in the first place. And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who knows... I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu open with shouldn't be that hard. Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button showing you a list of editors to select from. I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this feature/reported this bug but I guess there aren't a lot of people merging since it's not supported from within Versions. I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development in general is even harder. Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a significant upgrade. I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the new timeline view is a big improvement. But the fact that you still can't switch between show all and changed view without losing the way you had expanded folders is really annoying. Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad if your waiting a year for an update. Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would be a better forum for this discussion :-) Kindest regards, Marijn On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now and again when they use Kaleidoscope. Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye rowen...@gmail.com wrote: I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. Rob On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I remember it has a Compare with option on a per file bases. Exactly what we need in Versions... On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? Thanks, - Dirk On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than Sofa itself... http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor quinntay...@mac.com wrote: Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here:
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hey Marijn, I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. - Dirk On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dirk, I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and your argumentation. If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not want to use a GUI in the first place. And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who knows... I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu open with shouldn't be that hard. Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button showing you a list of editors to select from. I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this feature/reported this bug but I guess there aren't a lot of people merging since it's not supported from within Versions. I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development in general is even harder. Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a significant upgrade. I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the new timeline view is a big improvement. But the fact that you still can't switch between show all and changed view without losing the way you had expanded folders is really annoying. Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad if your waiting a year for an update. Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would be a better forum for this discussion :-) Kindest regards, Marijn On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now and again when they use Kaleidoscope. Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye rowen...@gmail.com wrote: I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. Rob On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I remember it has a Compare with option on a per file bases. Exactly what we need in Versions... On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? Thanks, - Dirk On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than Sofa itself... http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn
Re: Congrats, Versions team
Thanks Joe, It means a lot to hear that. - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 3:10 pm, Joe Wicentowski joe...@gmail.com wrote: 1.1 looks like a solid release with needed fixes and good new features. Thanks for continuing the development of Versions! For those who haven't seen it yet, here are the release notes:http://versionsapp.com/releasenotes Cheers, Joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
I'll be there. Jorde On 2 dec. 2010, at 18:36, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Hey Jorde, Good point, I'd love to set up a Versions users meetup in Amsterdam. Anyone else interested? - Dirk On Dec 2, 6:09 pm, Jorde Vorstenbosch jordevorstenbo...@gmail.com wrote: Dirk, I dislike the way you think, Why are you excluding others from this beer drinking event? Jorde P.s I still have to get version 1.1 and check it. On 2 dec. 2010, at 17:57, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Hey Marijn, I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. - Dirk On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dirk, I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and your argumentation. If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not want to use a GUI in the first place. And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who knows... I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu open with shouldn't be that hard. Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button showing you a list of editors to select from. I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this feature/reported this bug but I guess there aren't a lot of people merging since it's not supported from within Versions. I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development in general is even harder. Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a significant upgrade. I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the new timeline view is a big improvement. But the fact that you still can't switch between show all and changed view without losing the way you had expanded folders is really annoying. Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad if your waiting a year for an update. Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would be a better forum for this discussion :-) Kindest regards, Marijn On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn marijn.huizendv...@gmail.com wrote: It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now and again when they use Kaleidoscope. Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye rowen...@gmail.com wrote: I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. Rob On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I remember it has a Compare with option on a per file bases. Exactly what we need in Versions... On Nov 8, 10:04 pm,
Re: Congrats, Versions team
Hey Gabriel, Just wondering: Are you using Versions on Mac OS X 10.5 or 10.6? We've developed and reviewed the UI changes primarily on 10.6 (90% of active Versions users are on 10.6). Because of the lower default display gamma on 10.5, and various minute differences in the frameworks, everything gets a lot less contrast on 10.5. About the All/Changed button: It's very interesting to hear the feedback from everyone here. When I first saw Jasper's mockups with the button moved to the right, I freaked out a little. Later, when running pre-release builds I had a couple of moments similar to what Lorin describes. We decided to stick with the new location because it makes more sense (hierarchically) and we all got used to it pretty quickly. We'd love to hear more feedback on the UI changes. Of course we can't please everyone, but it really helps guide our ongoing fine-tuning efforts. Thanks, - Dirk On Dec 2, 7:57 pm, Gabriel Gilder gabriel.gil...@gmail.com wrote: Definitely a nice update, thanks to the team for all their work! One minor nit-pick... I personally find that with the new style of the Timeline/Browse/Transcript button, it's much more difficult to tell which is active, as the on/off states aren't as different as they used to be. Probably a minor visual tweak would fix this... anyone else feel this way? -Gabriel On Dec 2, 9:07 am, Shan iotas...@gmail.com wrote: I have to admit, when I heard Versions was going to get some updates, I was skeptical since we heard that for a LONG time. I'm happy to see this great step forward. Of course, if we could get the #1 requested feature added, that'd be great too. I won't mention it again, we all know what it is ;) Bottom line, I'd put my money where my mouth is. If I had to pay for an upgrade to, say 1.5 or 2.0 to get said new feature, I would. As developers, I think we can all understand there's a cost associated with adding features, so complaints about non-free updates should be minimal. Great update, here's to more of them :) Shan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Congrats, Versions team
On 2 Dec 2010, at 15:50, versions+nore...@googlegroups.com wrote: Of course, if we could get the #1 requested feature added, that'd be great too. I won't mention it again, we all know what it is ;) I know, I've been waiting for the ability to search the log for the longest time. But yes, nice to see a fairly substantial update. David Dunham http://a-sharp.com Twitter: @ASharpLLC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Congrats, Versions team
Yeah, that's what I meant. I just didn't want to say it again, I've asked for merging a couple times already on this list. Shan On Dec 2, 6:09 pm, Matthew Young m...@objectivea.com wrote: Isn't the #1 requested item branching and merging? -Matt On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:05 PM, David Dunham wrote: On 2 Dec 2010, at 15:50, versions+nore...@googlegroups.com wrote: Of course, if we could get the #1 requested feature added, that'd be great too. I won't mention it again, we all know what it is ;) I know, I've been waiting for the ability to search the log for the longest time. But yes, nice to see a fairly substantial update. David Dunham http://a-sharp.com Twitter: @ASharpLLC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Congrats, Versions team
Just wanted to make sure there was no confusion as David said, I know, I've been waiting for the ability to search the log for the longest time On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Shan wrote: Yeah, that's what I meant. I just didn't want to say it again, I've asked for merging a couple times already on this list. Shan On Dec 2, 6:09 pm, Matthew Young m...@objectivea.com wrote: Isn't the #1 requested item branching and merging? -Matt On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:05 PM, David Dunham wrote: On 2 Dec 2010, at 15:50, versions+nore...@googlegroups.com wrote: Of course, if we could get the #1 requested feature added, that'd be great too. I won't mention it again, we all know what it is ;) I know, I've been waiting for the ability to search the log for the longest time. But yes, nice to see a fairly substantial update. David Dunham http://a-sharp.com Twitter: @ASharpLLC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
version 1.1.1 broke my versions
Hi, i updated to 1.1.1 and it broke my installlation. I'm on a powerPC mac and now my versions is not working no more. If the software is not compatible it would be a good idea to NOT present the update option when it starts up. Anyone can tell me how i can downgrade? Thanks. JR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: version 1.1.1 broke my versions
Hi Jean-Rubin, Sorry for the bad experience, you can get the previous release of Versions here: www.versionsapp.com/redirect/builds/Versions_1.0.9_79.zip We would have preferred to not show the update message to PPC or 10.4 users, but sadly that wasn't possible due to limitations to the update mechanism. There was a warning in the release notes, but it's understable that you may have missed it. When you get the update message again, select Skip this Update and it won't offer you any incompatible updates again. All the best, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 3, 2:39 am, Jean-Rubin L jrleon...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i updated to 1.1.1 and it broke my installlation. I'm on a powerPC mac and now my versions is not working no more. If the software is not compatible it would be a good idea to NOT present the update option when it starts up. Anyone can tell me how i can downgrade? Thanks. JR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Congrats, Versions team
Hi Cue, I'm sorry you're dissappointed. But I can assure you that every single bullet point in the 1.1 release notes (did you read them? there were a lot of bullet points) is in there because it benefits people who use Versions. Sadly I can't promise you when particular features will ship, just that we'll do our best to implement what we think is most important for Versions, in the best way we can, as quickly as we can. - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 3, 1:20 am, Cue qbiz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm all for supporting the latest update, but that brings Versions that little closer to where IE6 is today. It's a substantial improvement to where it already stands against other clients. The two key features mentioned below are deemed as a substantial update. I would like to see features being introduced that really and truly need to be addressed, alongside the continuous improvements. Patience is a virtue, but how long before we see beneficial updates containing features that have already started rolling out in other clients? Cue On 3 Dec 2010, at 00:09, Matthew Young m...@objectivea.com wrote: Isn't the #1 requested item branching and merging? -Matt On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:05 PM, David Dunham wrote: On 2 Dec 2010, at 15:50, versions+nore...@googlegroups.com wrote: Of course, if we could get the #1 requested feature added, that'd be great too. I won't mention it again, we all know what it is ;) I know, I've been waiting for the ability to search the log for the longest time. But yes, nice to see a fairly substantial update. David Dunham http://a-sharp.com Twitter: @ASharpLLC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
[Feature-Request] Displaying multiple line log in the History Log viewer
The History Log viewer only displays the first line of a log entry if there are newline characters. I need to display detail log like Timeline in the History Log viewer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Congrats, Versions team
Here's one more kudos for the nice update. It looks like Sofa taking over Versions development is working out well (for you guys and for us!) Daniel On Dec 2, 12:01 pm, Dirk Stoop d...@madebysofa.com wrote: Thanks Joe, It means a lot to hear that. - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 3:10 pm, Joe Wicentowski joe...@gmail.com wrote: 1.1 looks like a solid release with needed fixes and good new features. Thanks for continuing the development of Versions! For those who haven't seen it yet, here are the release notes:http://versionsapp.com/releasenotes Cheers, Joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
