Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
To not clutter, but actually de-clutter the interface, the "Show remote changes" and "Show local changes" menu items could be merged into a "Show changes" menu item that have every kind of modifier key combination of cmd-d bound to it, so you can have "Show local changes with..." in the same menu item. I wish I lived a short trip away from Amsterdam so I could join your Versions Beer Event. ;) -Asbjørn On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:19:58 +0100, Marijn wrote: Hi Dirk, I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and your argumentation. If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not want to use a GUI in the first place. And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who knows... I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open with" shouldn't be that hard. Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button showing you a list of editors to select from. I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people merging since it's not supported from within Versions. I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development in general is even harder. Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a significant upgrade. I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the new timeline view is a big improvement. But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is really annoying. Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad if your waiting a year for an update. Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would be a better forum for this discussion :-) Kindest regards, Marijn On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: > I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved > in 1.1 > Was my problem set unclear? > To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge > with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. > The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. > Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it > comes to Versions... > Kindest regards, > Marijn > On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn > > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. > > > Rob > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > > > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> - Dirk > > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
I concur with keeping Versions simple, which is why I like the application so much. There are, however, a lot of features I wish Version had so I didn't have to dig down into the command line quite so often. Instead of being able to switch file comparison tool at any moment, I would much rather that Versions had merging built-in. Powered by Kaleidoscope or whatnot; I don't really care, but it's a feature I would very much like to see implemented. -Asbjørn On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:09:23 +0100, Dirk Stoop wrote: Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > Kindest regards, > Marijn > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. > > Rob > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > >> Thanks, > > >> - Dirk > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than > > >>> Sofa itself... > > >>>http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > >>> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > - Quinn > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > >> - Quinn > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > > >>> now. > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > > *cough* > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF)
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Sounds great! On Dec 2, 6:43 pm, Jorde Vorstenbosch wrote: > I'll be there. > > Jorde > > On 2 dec. 2010, at 18:36, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > > > Hey Jorde, Good point, > > > I'd love to set up a Versions users meetup in Amsterdam. > > > Anyone else interested? > > > - Dirk > > > On Dec 2, 6:09 pm, Jorde Vorstenbosch > > wrote: > >> Dirk, > > >> I dislike the way you think, > >> Why are you excluding others from this beer drinking event? > > >> Jorde > > >> P.s I still have to get version 1.1 and check it. > > >> On 2 dec. 2010, at 17:57, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > >>> Hey Marijn, > > >>> I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. > > >>> Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. > > >>> - Dirk > > >>> On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and > your argumentation. > If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not > want to use a GUI in the first place. > And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if > comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who > knows... > I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open > with" shouldn't be that hard. > Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button > showing you a list of editors to select from. > I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this > "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people > merging since it's not supported from within Versions. > I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development > in general is even harder. > Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a > significant upgrade. > I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the > new timeline view is a big improvement. > But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and > "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is > really annoying. > Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important > regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad > if your waiting a year for an update. > > Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not > why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would > be a better forum for this discussion :-) > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn > > On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > Hi Marijn, > > > With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just > > adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making > > Versions' interface more complicated. > > > Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We > > prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have > > the biggest impact. > > > This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't > > want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about > > Versions, but also for the second. > > > I think the real solution to this particular feature request is > > scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own > > scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard > > shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be > > weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to > > me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every > > comparison everywhere in the app. > > > I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't > > been 'resolved' in 1.1. > > > Cheers, > > - Dirk > > > the Versions team > > > On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: > > >> I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved > >> in 1.1 > > >> Was my problem set unclear? > >> To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge > >> with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. > > >> The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. > > >> Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it > >> comes to Versions... > > >> Kindest regards, > > >> Marijn > > >> On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > > >>> It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > >>> having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > >>> the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > >>> Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > >>> me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > >>> the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > >>> and again when they use Kaleidoscope. >
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
I'll be there. Jorde On 2 dec. 2010, at 18:36, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Hey Jorde, Good point, > > I'd love to set up a Versions users meetup in Amsterdam. > > Anyone else interested? > > - Dirk > > On Dec 2, 6:09 pm, Jorde Vorstenbosch > wrote: >> Dirk, >> >> I dislike the way you think, >> Why are you excluding others from this beer drinking event? >> >> Jorde >> >> P.s I still have to get version 1.1 and check it. >> >> On 2 dec. 2010, at 17:57, Dirk Stoop wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hey Marijn, >> >>> I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. >> >>> Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. >> >>> - Dirk >> >>> On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn wrote: Hi Dirk, >> I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and your argumentation. If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not want to use a GUI in the first place. And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who knows... I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open with" shouldn't be that hard. Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button showing you a list of editors to select from. I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people merging since it's not supported from within Versions. I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development in general is even harder. Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a significant upgrade. I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the new timeline view is a big improvement. But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is really annoying. Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad if your waiting a year for an update. >> Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would be a better forum for this discussion :-) >> Kindest regards, >> Marijn >> On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: >> > Hi Marijn, >> > With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just > adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making > Versions' interface more complicated. >> > Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We > prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have > the biggest impact. >> > This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't > want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about > Versions, but also for the second. >> > I think the real solution to this particular feature request is > scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own > scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard > shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be > weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to > me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every > comparison everywhere in the app. >> > I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't > been 'resolved' in 1.1. >> > Cheers, > - Dirk >> > the Versions team >> > On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: >> >> I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved >> in 1.1 >> >> Was my problem set unclear? >> To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge >> with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. >> >> The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. >> >> Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it >> comes to Versions... >> >> Kindest regards, >> >> Marijn >> >> On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: >> >>> It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for >>> having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using >>> the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. >> >>> Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for >>> me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out >>> the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now >>> and again when they use Kaleidoscope. >> >>> Kindest regards, >> >>> Marijn >> >>> On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: >> I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant d
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hey Jorde, Good point, I'd love to set up a Versions users meetup in Amsterdam. Anyone else interested? - Dirk On Dec 2, 6:09 pm, Jorde Vorstenbosch wrote: > Dirk, > > I dislike the way you think, > Why are you excluding others from this beer drinking event? > > Jorde > > P.s I still have to get version 1.1 and check it. > > On 2 dec. 2010, at 17:57, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > > > Hey Marijn, > > > I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. > > > Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. > > > - Dirk > > > On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn wrote: > >> Hi Dirk, > > >> I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and > >> your argumentation. > >> If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not > >> want to use a GUI in the first place. > >> And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if > >> comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who > >> knows... > >> I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open > >> with" shouldn't be that hard. > >> Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button > >> showing you a list of editors to select from. > >> I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this > >> "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people > >> merging since it's not supported from within Versions. > >> I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development > >> in general is even harder. > >> Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a > >> significant upgrade. > >> I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the > >> new timeline view is a big improvement. > >> But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and > >> "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is > >> really annoying. > >> Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important > >> regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad > >> if your waiting a year for an update. > > >> Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not > >> why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would > >> be a better forum for this discussion :-) > > >> Kindest regards, > > >> Marijn > > >> On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > >>> Hi Marijn, > > >>> With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just > >>> adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making > >>> Versions' interface more complicated. > > >>> Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We > >>> prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have > >>> the biggest impact. > > >>> This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't > >>> want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about > >>> Versions, but also for the second. > > >>> I think the real solution to this particular feature request is > >>> scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own > >>> scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard > >>> shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be > >>> weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to > >>> me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every > >>> comparison everywhere in the app. > > >>> I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't > >>> been 'resolved' in 1.1. > > >>> Cheers, > >>> - Dirk > > >>> the Versions team > > >>> On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: > > I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved > in 1.1 > > Was my problem set unclear? > To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge > with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. > > The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. > > Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it > comes to Versions... > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn > > On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn > > > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > >> I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant > >> difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as > >> compared with Versions. > > >> Rob > >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > >
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Dirk, I dislike the way you think, Why are you excluding others from this beer drinking event? Jorde P.s I still have to get version 1.1 and check it. On 2 dec. 2010, at 17:57, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Hey Marijn, > > I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. > > Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. > > - Dirk > > On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn wrote: >> Hi Dirk, >> >> I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and >> your argumentation. >> If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not >> want to use a GUI in the first place. >> And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if >> comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who >> knows... >> I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open >> with" shouldn't be that hard. >> Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button >> showing you a list of editors to select from. >> I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this >> "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people >> merging since it's not supported from within Versions. >> I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development >> in general is even harder. >> Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a >> significant upgrade. >> I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the >> new timeline view is a big improvement. >> But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and >> "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is >> really annoying. >> Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important >> regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad >> if your waiting a year for an update. >> >> Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not >> why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would >> be a better forum for this discussion :-) >> >> Kindest regards, >> >> Marijn >> >> On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Marijn, >> >>> With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just >>> adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making >>> Versions' interface more complicated. >> >>> Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We >>> prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have >>> the biggest impact. >> >>> This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't >>> want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about >>> Versions, but also for the second. >> >>> I think the real solution to this particular feature request is >>> scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own >>> scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard >>> shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be >>> weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to >>> me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every >>> comparison everywhere in the app. >> >>> I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't >>> been 'resolved' in 1.1. >> >>> Cheers, >>> - Dirk >> >>> the Versions team >> >>> On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: >> I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 >> Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. >> The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. >> Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... >> Kindest regards, >> Marijn >> On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: >> > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. >> > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. >> > Kindest regards, >> > Marijn >> > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: >> >> I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference >> in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with >> Versions. >> >> Rob >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: >> >>> My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I >>> remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. >> >>> Exactly what we need in Versions... >> >>> On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, but exac
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hey Marijn, I like the way you think, especially that last sentence. Drop me a line by email and let's meet up sometime. - Dirk On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Marijn wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and > your argumentation. > If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not > want to use a GUI in the first place. > And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if > comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who > knows... > I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open > with" shouldn't be that hard. > Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button > showing you a list of editors to select from. > I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this > "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people > merging since it's not supported from within Versions. > I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development > in general is even harder. > Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a > significant upgrade. > I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the > new timeline view is a big improvement. > But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and > "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is > really annoying. > Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important > regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad > if your waiting a year for an update. > > Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not > why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would > be a better forum for this discussion :-) > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn > > On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > > > Hi Marijn, > > > With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just > > adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making > > Versions' interface more complicated. > > > Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We > > prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have > > the biggest impact. > > > This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't > > want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about > > Versions, but also for the second. > > > I think the real solution to this particular feature request is > > scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own > > scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard > > shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be > > weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to > > me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every > > comparison everywhere in the app. > > > I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't > > been 'resolved' in 1.1. > > > Cheers, > > - Dirk > > > the Versions team > > > On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved > > > in 1.1 > > > > Was my problem set unclear? > > > To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge > > > with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. > > > > The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. > > > > Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it > > > comes to Versions... > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Marijn > > > > On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > > > > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > > > > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > > > > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > > > > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > > > > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > > > > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > Marijn > > > > > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > > > > > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant > > > > > difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as > > > > > compared with Versions. > > > > > > Rob > > > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > > > > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > > > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > > > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > > > > > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> - Dirk > > > > > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using K
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hi Dirk, I'm sorry, I have a lot of trouble with your suggested solution and your argumentation. If I wanted to create scripts to enhance my workflow I'd probably not want to use a GUI in the first place. And wouldn't you say that the interface is already too cluttered if comparisons can be initiated from so many places in the app? Who knows... I don't know cocoa but my guess is that adding an extra menu "open with" shouldn't be that hard. Or adding a menu when you hold down the remote/local changes button showing you a list of editors to select from. I find it odd that thus far I'm the only one that has requested this "feature"/"reported this bug" but I guess there aren't a lot of people merging since it's not supported from within Versions. I understand that managing expectations is hard and that development in general is even harder. Though IMO I've always gotten the feeling that 1.1 would be a significant upgrade. I love the fact that I can organize my bookmarks in folders and the new timeline view is a big improvement. But the fact that you still can't switch between "show all" and "changed" view without losing the way you had expanded folders is really annoying. Maybe that's just me but most of the issues that are important regarding workflow have not yet been resolved which is really too bad if your waiting a year for an update. Again this is starting to look way too much like a rant which is not why I'm here. Apologies for that, maybe grabbing a beer together would be a better forum for this discussion :-) Kindest regards, Marijn On Dec 2, 2:09 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Hi Marijn, > > With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just > adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making > Versions' interface more complicated. > > Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We > prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have > the biggest impact. > > This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't > want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about > Versions, but also for the second. > > I think the real solution to this particular feature request is > scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own > scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard > shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be > weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to > me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every > comparison everywhere in the app. > > I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't > been 'resolved' in 1.1. > > Cheers, > - Dirk > > the Versions team > > On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved > > in 1.1 > > > Was my problem set unclear? > > To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge > > with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. > > > The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. > > > Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it > > comes to Versions... > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn > > > On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > > > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > > > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > > > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > > > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > > > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > > > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Marijn > > > > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > > > > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference > > > > in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with > > > > Versions. > > > > > Rob > > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > > > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > > > > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> - Dirk > > > > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope > > > > >>> than > > > > >>> Sofa itself... > > > > > >>>http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > > > > >>> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not > > > > the only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and > > > > won't be supported. C
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hi Marijn, With the many places in the app that let you open a comparison, just adding this one 'simple feature' is very hard to do without making Versions' interface more complicated. Secondly, so far you're the only person who requested this feature. We prioritize the features we implement by which ones – we believe – have the biggest impact. This one didn't make the cut primarily for the first reason — we don't want to clutter Versions' interface and destroy the best thing about Versions, but also for the second. I think the real solution to this particular feature request is scriptability, maybe similar to how some apps let you add your own scripts to a menu somewhere in the app (complete with keyboard shortcuts). That's a major undertaking, and therefore will have to be weighed against other 'big features', but it's a lot more appealing to me than adding an option to temporarily switch diffing apps for every comparison everywhere in the app. I hope this sheds some light on why this 'one simple issue' hasn't been 'resolved' in 1.1. Cheers, - Dirk the Versions team On Dec 2, 12:15 pm, Marijn wrote: > I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved > in 1.1 > > Was my problem set unclear? > To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge > with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. > > The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. > > Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it > comes to Versions... > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn > > On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn > > > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > > > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference > > > in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with > > > Versions. > > > > Rob > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > > > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> - Dirk > > > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than > > > >>> Sofa itself... > > > > >>>http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > > > >>> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the > > > only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't > > > be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > > > - Quinn > > > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not > > > >> yet supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive > > > >> and thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > > > >> - Quinn > > > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to > > > >>> opening > > > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to > > > >>> test it > > > >>> now. > > > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > > > *cough* > > > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with > > > > good ol' > > > > filemerge. > > > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as > > > > diff > > > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > > > Going into the preferenc
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
I'm really disappointed to see that this issue has not been resolved in 1.1 Was my problem set unclear? To me it seems pretty straightforward that one would love to merge with FileMerge and view changes with Kaleidoscope. The workflow to support that right now is non-existent at best. Damn, I hate the fact that I've become such a negative nancy when it comes to Versions... Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:22 pm, Marijn wrote: > It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for > having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using > the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. > > Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for > me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out > the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now > and again when they use Kaleidoscope. > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn > > On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > > > > > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in > > the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. > > > Rob > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > > >> Thanks, > > >> - Dirk > > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than > > >>> Sofa itself... > > > >>>http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > > >>> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the > > only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't > > be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > > - Quinn > > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and > > >> thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > > >> - Quinn > > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test > > >>> it > > >>> now. > > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > > *cough* > > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good > > > ol' > > > filemerge. > > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit > > > cumbersome... > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Marijn > > > >> smime.p7s > > >> 4KViewDownload > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Versions" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > > smime.p7s > > 4KViewDownload > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Versions" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
It's not as much the support for Kaleidoscope itself but more for having the option to switch between filemerge en Kaleidoscope. Using the former for merging and the latter for viewing changes. Anyway, I'm abandoning SVN in favor of Git. This is only a concern for me on the project I'm about to finish. I merely wanted to point out the problem set this creates for people that have to merge changes now and again when they use Kaleidoscope. Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 17, 9:27 pm, Rob Rye wrote: > I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in > the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. > > Rob > On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > >> Thanks, > >> - Dirk > > >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than > >>> Sofa itself... > > >>>http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > >>> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only > way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be > supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > - Quinn > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and > >> thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > >> - Quinn > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > >>> now. > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > *cough* > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > filemerge. > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn > > >> smime.p7s > >> 4KViewDownload > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Versions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > smime.p7s > 4KViewDownload > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Versions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
I have licenses for both. I don't really see any significant difference in the support for using Kaleidoscope in Cornerstone as compared with Versions. Rob On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marijn wrote: > My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I > remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. > > Exactly what we need in Versions... > > On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: >> Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have >> better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? >> >> Thanks, >> - Dirk >> >> On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: >> >> >> >>> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than >>> Sofa itself... >> >>> http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone >> >>> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: >> Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: >> http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support >> - Quinn >> On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: >> > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > response it won't be in the future either... >> > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. >> >> http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ >> >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive >> amid competitors which *do* support merging. >> >> - Quinn >> >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: >> >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it >>> now. >> >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: *cough* >> On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: >> > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. >> > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > filemerge. > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > viewer from the interface in Versions? > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... >> > Kindest regards, >> > Marijn >> >> smime.p7s >> 4KViewDownload >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Versions" group. > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. >> smime.p7s 4KViewDownload > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Versions" group. > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
My trial copy of CS expired so I cannot confirm for 100% but as I remember it has a "Compare with" option on a per file bases. Exactly what we need in Versions... On Nov 8, 10:04 pm, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > Thanks, > - Dirk > > On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than > > Sofa itself... > > >http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > > On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only > > > way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be > > > supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > > >http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > > > - Quinn > > > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > > > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and > > > >> thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > > > >> - Quinn > > > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > > > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > > > >>> now. > > > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > > > *cough* > > > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > > > filemerge. > > > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > Marijn > > > > >> smime.p7s > > > >> 4KViewDownload > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Versions" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > > > smime.p7s > > > 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
You got me on that one... On Nov 8, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have > better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? > > Thanks, > - Dirk > > On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: >> Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than >> Sofa itself... >> >> http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone >> >> On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: >> >> >> >>> Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only >>> way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be >>> supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: >> >>> http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support >> >>> - Quinn >> >>> On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: >> Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team response it won't be in the future either... >> On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > It's true, no merge on the feature list. >> > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ >> > Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive > amid competitors which *do* support merging. >> > - Quinn >> > On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: >> >> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that >> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to >> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening >> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it >> now. >> >> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: >>> *cough* >> >>> On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: >> I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. >> Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' filemerge. How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff viewer from the interface in Versions? Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... >> Kindest regards, >> Marijn >> > smime.p7s > 4KViewDownload >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. >> >>> smime.p7s >>> 4KViewDownload > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Versions" group. > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Maybe I'm missing something, but exactly how does Cornerstone have better support for Kaleidoscope than Versions? Thanks, - Dirk On Oct 28, 7:44 pm, Marijn wrote: > Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than > Sofa itself... > > http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone > > On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only > > way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be > > supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > >http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > > - Quinn > > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive > > >> amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > > >> - Quinn > > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > > >>> now. > > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > > *cough* > > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > > filemerge. > > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Marijn > > > >> smime.p7s > > >> 4KViewDownload > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Versions" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > > smime.p7s > > 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
asked that earlier that year, and got an answer per email.. not sure when and if its been added, i watched the cornerstone 2 tour, i think ihave to change soon... versions lacks to many features i need... cause of that i'll wait buying kaleidoscope till the diff feature is in it, i'm not buing it and hoping that sofa will act soon any more :) Hey Simon, Not yet, but that's something we'd like to add in the future. - Pieter The Kaleidoscope Team On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, xx wrote: Hey folks, just wanna ask if kaleidoscope is able to create diff files? Regards Simon On 28 Okt., 14:45, Marijn wrote: > Hmm, that may have come out a bit too harsh. > > Would love to see some of those features in Versions though :-) > > On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > > > > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only > > way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be > > supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > >http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > > - Quinn > > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive > > >> amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > > >> - Quinn > > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > > >>> now. > > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > > *cough* > > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > > filemerge. > > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Marijn > > > >> smime.p7s > > >> 4KViewDownload > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Versions" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > > smime.p7s > > 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Hmm, that may have come out a bit too harsh. Would love to see some of those features in Versions though :-) On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way > to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. > Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > - Quinn > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive > >> amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > >> - Quinn > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > >>> now. > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > *cough* > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > filemerge. > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn > > >> smime.p7s > >> 4KViewDownload > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Versions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > > > smime.p7s > 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Funny, the competition has better support for using Kaleidoscope than Sofa itself... http://www.zennaware.com/cornerstone On Oct 17, 4:49 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way > to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. > Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support > > - Quinn > > On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > > > > > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > > response it won't be in the future either... > > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > >>http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive > >> amid competitors which *do* support merging. > > >> - Quinn > > >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > >>> now. > > >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > *cough* > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > filemerge. > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn > > >> smime.p7s > >> 4KViewDownload > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Versions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > > > > smime.p7s > 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Don't assume it won't be in the future. This email group is not the only way to get the devs' attention, or to judge what will and won't be supported. Check out the FAQ and email them directly here: http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/support - Quinn On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Marijn wrote: > Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team > response it won't be in the future either... > > On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: >> It's true, no merge on the feature list. >> >> http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ >> >> Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet >> supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive amid >> competitors which *do* support merging. >> >> - Quinn >> >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: >> >> >> >>> really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that >>> can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to >>> merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening >>> yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it >>> now. >> >>> On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: *cough* >> On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: >> > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. >> > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > filemerge. > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > viewer from the interface in Versions? > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... >> > Kindest regards, >> > Marijn >> >> >> >> smime.p7s >> 4KViewDownload > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Versions" group. > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
Well I take it this is not supported and given the lack of team response it won't be in the future either... On Oct 11, 7:08 pm, Quinn Taylor wrote: > It's true, no merge on the feature list. > > http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ > > Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet > supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive amid > competitors which *do* support merging. > > - Quinn > > On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > > > > > really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > > can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > > merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > > yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > > now. > > > On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > >> *cough* > > >> On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > >>> I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > >>> Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > >>> I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > >>> filemerge. > >>> How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > >>> viewer from the interface in Versions? > >>> Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > >>> Kindest regards, > > >>> Marijn > > > > smime.p7s > 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
It's true, no merge on the feature list. http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/ Notice the emphasis on *spotting* changes quickly. Merge is not yet supported, but I imagine it will have to in order to survive and thrive amid competitors which *do* support merging. - Quinn On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:58 AM, pSouper wrote: > really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that > can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to > merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening > yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it > now. > > > On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: >> *cough* >> >> On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: >> >>> I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. >> >>> Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). >>> I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' >>> filemerge. >>> How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff >>> viewer from the interface in Versions? >>> Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... >> >>> Kindest regards, >> >>> Marijn smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
really? Kaleidoscope doesn't merge? what good is a diff tool that can't merge? i'd be surpised and shocked i it didn't allow you to merge files - i've just bought it but haven't got around to opening yet so i'd go as far as being discussted... i'm popping off to test it now. On Oct 6, 6:43 am, Marijn wrote: > *cough* > > On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > > > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > > filemerge. > > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > > viewer from the interface in Versions? > > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > > Kindest regards, > > > Marijn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Re: Diff with Kaleidoscope
*cough* On Sep 29, 5:17 pm, Marijn wrote: > I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. > > Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). > I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' > filemerge. > How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff > viewer from the interface in Versions? > Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... > > Kindest regards, > > Marijn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
Diff with Kaleidoscope
I'm having a little workflow problem with Kaleidoscope. Unfortunately Kaleidoscope doesn't have merge support (WTF). I often need to merge changes, so I'll have to do that with good ol' filemerge. How do I switch easily between filemerge and kaleidoscope as diff viewer from the interface in Versions? Going into the preference pane every time seems a bit cumbersome... Kindest regards, Marijn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
