[videoblogging] Watching the World Cup during Vloggercon
http://tinyurl.com/h6eva Chas Hope! Check out Craig's List. There's a ton of World Cup-related stuff going on. All you World Cup fans will be just fine during Vloggercon. Now, I can rest. XO, Jan -- http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://the-hold.blogspot.com - poetry http://dagnyhemingway.blogspot.com - machinima http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] blip.tv, my .mp4 uploads appear as .flv files? [ don't appear over iTunes video-podcast ]
Previously, my .mp4 uploads appears as .mp4 when I upload to blip.tv They've changed it around, a fancier look. My .mp4 uploads now appear as .flv I'm using Blogger as video-blog source for my iTunes video-podcasts. Feedburner shows the .flv as enclosures, but iTunes is not picking them up when I update my video-podcast. What is the solution? Can I changed the source files on blip.tv to .mp4..? SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon Session - The Undisovered Country
On 6/3/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of the phrases that has stuck with me is Steve Starr of Revversaying that now ...is like 1908 in Hollywood at the TransformationNation: New Leaders in Convergence Technology panel ( http://www.cirne.com/vlog/2006/05/02/sfiff-49-like-1980-in-hollywood-505/or http://tinyurl.com/l2wym .)In 1908 filmmaking was in it'sinfancy, people were making mostly one reel films, mostly emulating theatre with a fixed camera and pantomine was the standard actingform.In ten years that had completely changed with films mostlybeing around 90 minutes long, the camera and framing changing andemphasizing the story and acting moving toward more natural _expression_.A certain form of Cinema emerged as appropriate to themedium.Other forms continued to exist and develop as a alternative,but not the standard.Okay. I agree with that. And what I want to do is talk about some of the work that's being done now that may (or may not) shape what things look like in a couple of years. So what is Steve Starr doing with Revver? Is that pushing the envelope? Does it create new possiblilites for you and I in terms of videoblogging? If so, how? Quickly I could say: Enric has developed this way of embeding video directly into a web page that is 1. easy to use and 2. helps to make the video more compatible with various browsers. This allows for videoblogging to be more viewer-friendly and hopfully is one of pieces of technology that will help make videoblogging more widespread. To me that opens up the possiblility of more people particpating which means more voices and more collaboration. Also what effect does having the video play in web page have vs. in a pop-up window or with that thickbox effect? Are things that I can do with one approach that I can't do with another? These are the things we want to talk about.-Verdi-- Author of the book Secrets Of VideobloggingMe -- http://michaelverdi.comLearn to videoblog -- http://freevlog.orgI'm Going To Vloggercon, June 10 11 -- http://vloggercon.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] blip.tv, my .mp4 uploads appear as .flv files? [ don't appear over iTunes video-podcast ]
Hey B,Your .mp4 uploads *should* appear as .flv (in addition to .mp4) on www.blip.tv, but it's your choice how they appear on your blog (you can change your options by clicking Edit on your blog at http://www.blip.tv/blogs/list/). Either way, FeedBurner should *not* be picking the .flv files up as enclosures -- we specifically don't use rel=enclosure on them, instead always including the link to the .mp4 with a rel=enclosure. Could you send me the URL of your blog and your blip username off-list, so that we can look into this in more detail? I haven't heard about this particular problem before and I'd like to find the cause and fix it for you as soon as possible. You can e-mail me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or you can send your e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED].It may also be helpful to you to join the blip-users group so that you don't have to send blip-specific support e-mail to the videoblogging list. You can ask to join at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/blip-users/ and I'll be sure to approve your membership request right away.Yours,MikeCo-founder, blip.tvOn 6/4/06, B Yen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previously, my .mp4 uploads appears as .mp4 when I upload to blip.tvThey've changed it around, a fancier look.My .mp4 uploads nowappear as .flvI'm using Blogger as video-blog source for my iTunes video-podcasts. Feedburner shows the .flv as enclosures, but iTunes is not pickingthem up when I update my video-podcast.What is the solution?Can I changed the source files on blip.tv to .mp4..? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Everything you need is oneclick away. Make Yahoo! your home pagenow. http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] It's a girl!!!!!!!
new life in the vlogging world! (a potential new vlogger :) congratulations Andy! On 6/3/06, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Introducing Kayleigh India Carvin: http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2006/06/its_a_girl.html Born at 10:34pm ET on Friday, June 2, 2006 in Boston, Massachusetts. Five pounds, 12 ounces, screams like a Beatles groupie, has my hair before I started losing it, as well as my impatient temperament. Mother and child are resting comfortably while I obsessively upload photos to flickr at three in the morning. http://www.flickr.com/photos/andycarvin This is the first of what I'm sure will be thousands of videos of Kayleigh. That is, until she's old enough to hold the camera and turn it on us. With a vlogger and a documentary maker as parents, you'd think it would be inevitable. :-) I'll try to upload more videos over the weekend. freakin' proud as hell, andy -- -- Andy Carvin acarvin (at) edc . org andycarvin (at) yahoo . com http://www.andycarvin.com http://www.digitaldivide.net http://www.pbs.org/learningnow -- Yahoo! Groups Links -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality! http://www.savetheinternet.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon Session - The Undisovered Country
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/3/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of the phrases that has stuck with me is Steve Starr of Revver saying that now ...is like 1908 in Hollywood at the Transformation Nation: New Leaders in Convergence Technology panel ( http://www.cirne.com/vlog/2006/05/02/sfiff-49-like-1980-in-hollywood-505/ or http://tinyurl.com/l2wym .) In 1908 filmmaking was in it's infancy, people were making mostly one reel films, mostly emulating theatre with a fixed camera and pantomine was the standard acting form. In ten years that had completely changed with films mostly being around 90 minutes long, the camera and framing changing and emphasizing the story and acting moving toward more natural _expression_. A certain form of Cinema emerged as appropriate to the medium. Other forms continued to exist and develop as a alternative, but not the standard. Okay. I agree with that. And what I want to do is talk about some of the work that's being done now that may (or may not) shape what things look like in a couple of years. That's a very interesting question. So what is Steve Starr doing with Revver? Is that pushing the envelope? Does it create new possiblilites for you and I in terms of videoblogging? If so, how? Steve Starr as founder and CEO of Revver has a financial system where an ad of the choice of the video owner's is placed at the end of their video. This video remains the ownership of the creator and can be accessed outside of Revver. If I recall correctly, the ad profits are split 50%. Here's an example I like on the Dixie Chicks Not Ready to Make Nice video: http://revver.com/video/25766/11749 -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com http://www.cinegage.com Quickly I could say: Enric has developed this way of embeding video directly into a web page that is 1. easy to use and 2. helps to make the video more compatible with various browsers. This allows for videoblogging to be more viewer-friendly and hopfully is one of pieces of technology that will help make videoblogging more widespread. To me that opens up the possiblility of more people particpating which means more voices and more collaboration. Also what effect does having the video play in web page have vs. in a pop-up window or with that thickbox effect? Are things that I can do with one approach that I can't do with another? These are the things we want to talk about. -Verdi -- Author of the book Secrets Of Videoblogging Me -- http://michaelverdi.com Learn to videoblog -- http://freevlog.org I'm Going To Vloggercon, June 10 11 -- http://vloggercon.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] The Shallow Nature of Video Blogging
Shannon, For the record, meaning never comes from things - it comes from the perceiver. Things are just things, until some perceiver adds meaning to them. How could it be any other way? ... Richard On 6/2/06, Shannon Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's possible that you miss my point jay. your work is not significant. neither is mine. we add meaning to it by our own right to get what we want. by our own circumstances, we attache meaning and broadcast it. to get what we want from others. response. On 6/2/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i dont think this makes my or anyone's work less significant. but you are right if these bombs attacks were to happen in the USit would be the biggest deal in the world. huge memorials, exhaustive news coverage, policy changes. but its not happening here. more revealing video made available more often could change that. Jay SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality! http://www.savetheinternet.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] The Shallow Nature of Video Blogging
I don't usually get in on these, but this one really intrigues me ... plus, I'm trying to avoid doing my monthly family finances, which is always a creative adventure ... On 6/2/06, Shannon Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nothing NEEDS context. ... For a thing to be a thing it needs context. What is a thing? I couldn't tell you unless I had context, you see. None of any of this makes sense without context. It seems like you are trying to say vlogs are bad because they are interpreted within some context (they are enculturated) ... This is the same as saying, vlogs are perceived. There is this fundamental process, where an object impinges on a sense organ - from than instant the signal is translated into a neural signal, and intensely manipulated, and eventually it is labeled - it is given meaning probably someone in association areas of the cortext (in class, I used to say then a miracle happens). There is nothing that can be labeled or given meaning that is not enculterated. The best we can do - the only thing we can do - is to recognize that this process of subjective perception is reality. What we think of as objective and emperical is ultimately consensus. you begin falacy at that point. as well as personal manipulation, in order to control your world around you. ... I guess I would want to know which part of Shannon's thinking/agurments/perception would NOT be classified as personal manipulation ... everything I'm saying and perceiving here is certainly personal manipulation ... I can't imagine how it could be otherwise ... langauge is a tool. used to manipulate in order to get what you want. I'm pretty sure what you wrote above would constitute language, so, it follows ... well, you know ... ... I would say that language is the great and fundamental abstraction tool that allows us to function in the world ... and have interesting discussions like this, I might add ... ... well, that was fun ... Richard -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality! http://www.savetheinternet.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: The Shallow Nature of Video Blogging
I am so tempted to respond. And where this a group on linguistics, philosophy or such, I would :) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't usually get in on these, but this one really intrigues me ... plus, I'm trying to avoid doing my monthly family finances, which is always a creative adventure ... On 6/2/06, Shannon Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nothing NEEDS context. ... For a thing to be a thing it needs context. What is a thing? I couldn't tell you unless I had context, you see. None of any of this makes sense without context. It seems like you are trying to say vlogs are bad because they are interpreted within some context (they are enculturated) ... This is the same as saying, vlogs are perceived. There is this fundamental process, where an object impinges on a sense organ - from than instant the signal is translated into a neural signal, and intensely manipulated, and eventually it is labeled - it is given meaning probably someone in association areas of the cortext (in class, I used to say then a miracle happens). There is nothing that can be labeled or given meaning that is not enculterated. The best we can do - the only thing we can do - is to recognize that this process of subjective perception is reality. What we think of as objective and emperical is ultimately consensus. you begin falacy at that point. as well as personal manipulation, in order to control your world around you. ... I guess I would want to know which part of Shannon's thinking/agurments/perception would NOT be classified as personal manipulation ... everything I'm saying and perceiving here is certainly personal manipulation ... I can't imagine how it could be otherwise ... langauge is a tool. used to manipulate in order to get what you want. I'm pretty sure what you wrote above would constitute language, so, it follows ... well, you know ... ... I would say that language is the great and fundamental abstraction tool that allows us to function in the world ... and have interesting discussions like this, I might add ... ... well, that was fun ... Richard -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality! http://www.savetheinternet.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Shallow Nature of Video Blogging
Well, let's bring it up again at Vloggercon after I have been thoroughly enculturated via a few beers from Schlomo's bar ... Richard On 6/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am so tempted to respond. And where this a group on linguistics, philosophy or such, I would :) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't usually get in on these, but this one really intrigues me ... plus, I'm trying to avoid doing my monthly family finances, which is always a creative adventure ... On 6/2/06, Shannon Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nothing NEEDS context. ... For a thing to be a thing it needs context. What is a thing? I couldn't tell you unless I had context, you see. None of any of this makes sense without context. It seems like you are trying to say vlogs are bad because they are interpreted within some context (they are enculturated) ... This is the same as saying, vlogs are perceived. There is this fundamental process, where an object impinges on a sense organ - from than instant the signal is translated into a neural signal, and intensely manipulated, and eventually it is labeled - it is given meaning probably someone in association areas of the cortext (in class, I used to say then a miracle happens). There is nothing that can be labeled or given meaning that is not enculterated. The best we can do - the only thing we can do - is to recognize that this process of subjective perception is reality. What we think of as objective and emperical is ultimately consensus. you begin falacy at that point. as well as personal manipulation, in order to control your world around you. ... I guess I would want to know which part of Shannon's thinking/agurments/perception would NOT be classified as personal manipulation ... everything I'm saying and perceiving here is certainly personal manipulation ... I can't imagine how it could be otherwise ... langauge is a tool. used to manipulate in order to get what you want. I'm pretty sure what you wrote above would constitute language, so, it follows ... well, you know ... ... I would say that language is the great and fundamental abstraction tool that allows us to function in the world ... and have interesting discussions like this, I might add ... ... well, that was fun ... Richard -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality! http://www.savetheinternet.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality! http://www.savetheinternet.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: The Shallow Nature of Video Blogging
My thinking too (though I wasn't considering the libation portion.)
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, let's bring it up again at Vloggercon after I have been
thoroughly enculturated via a few beers from Schlomo's bar ... Richard
On 6/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am so tempted to respond. And where this a group on linguistics,
philosophy or such, I would :)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall
richard@ wrote:
I don't usually get in on these, but this one really intrigues
me ...
plus, I'm trying to avoid doing my monthly family finances, which is
always a creative adventure ...
On 6/2/06, Shannon Noble shannon.sn@ wrote:
nothing NEEDS context.
... For a thing to be a thing it needs context. What is a
thing?
I couldn't tell you unless I had context, you see. None of any
of this
makes sense without context.
It seems like you are trying to say vlogs are bad because they are
interpreted within some context (they are enculturated) ...
This is
the same as saying, vlogs are perceived.
There is this fundamental process, where an object impinges on a
sense
organ - from than instant the signal is translated into a neural
signal, and intensely manipulated, and eventually it is
labeled - it
is given meaning probably someone in association areas of the
cortext
(in class, I used to say then a miracle happens).
There is nothing that can be labeled or given meaning that is not
enculterated.
The best we can do - the only thing we can do - is to recognize that
this process of subjective perception is reality.
What we think of as objective and emperical is ultimately
consensus.
you begin falacy at that point. as well as personal manipulation,
in order
to control your world around you.
... I guess I would want to know which part of Shannon's
thinking/agurments/perception would NOT be classified as personal
manipulation ... everything I'm saying and perceiving here is
certainly personal manipulation ... I can't imagine how it
could be
otherwise ...
langauge is a tool.
used to manipulate in order to get what you want.
I'm pretty sure what you wrote above would constitute
language, so, it follows ... well, you know ...
... I would say that language is the great and fundamental
abstraction
tool that allows us to function in the world ... and have
interesting
discussions like this, I might add ...
... well, that was fun ... Richard
--
Richard
http://www.richardshow.com
Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality!
http://www.savetheinternet.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Richard
http://www.richardshow.com
Save the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality!
http://www.savetheinternet.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Typepad
Use
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] flash meeting happening now, if anyone wants to join in
http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080/fm/index.php?pwd=aa78ea-4607 SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] The Shallow Nature of Video Blogging
On 6/4/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't usually get in on these, but this one really intrigues me ...plusAh! I like that! nothing NEEDS context For a thing to be a thing it needs context. What is a thing?I couldn't tell you unless I had context, you see. None of any of thismakes sense without context. Exactly. Who or what decides what that context is? A lengthy process to describe but much of that comes down to who is really in power. I'm talking about it in a bigger sense. In our case, we have values based much on how the system functions and keeps us all in line. This is not the place for me to elaborate on that as we could go on forever about it. It seems like you are trying to say vlogs are bad because they areinterpreted within some context (they are enculturated) ... This is the same as saying, vlogs are perceived.No. I didn't say vlogs are bad. Having a shallow nature is only one side of how a vlog can be perceived. It was something I question about my own vlog and have at times pulled stuff down as my perceptions of my own work sometimes change. So often when trolling for video blog visuals one comes upon a massive amount of material, that is in MY opinion, mundane and a waste of time for me to be viewing. It's hard to find consistently good stuff, so one trolls and looks for what one wants to see. There is so much out there to look at that it becomes overwhelming and tiresome. And now... anyone can have a soap box to stand on and ponitificate without responsibility. I usually go in to a site with optimism, looking to validate. I don't find a lot of that yet. by example. here is a list of sites I trolled through this morning. I got lucky. there is some good work on these sites. not all of it, but some. all based on my opinion and what my needs are. what i want to collect and record in my brain to be used in another fashion somehow as I may pontificate about to someone else another time. http://www.blogwaves.com/http://lookingglasslandvlog.blogspot.com/ http://www.kenyamoto.com/http://www.escape.is/main.php?vloghttp://php.internet.is/levy/weareone/ http://blogger.xs4all.nl/videorephttp://php.internet.is/levy/weareone/cat/vcast/ There is this fundamental process, where an object impinges on a senseorgan - from than instant the signal is translated into a neural signal, and intensely manipulated, and eventually it is labeled - itis given meaning probably someone in association areas of the cortext(in class, I used to say then a miracle happens). There is nothing that can be labeled or given meaning that is notenculterated.The best we can do - the only thing we can do - is to recognize thatthis process of subjective perception is reality. What we think of as objective and emperical is ultimately consensus.I completely agree with you. you begin falacy at that point. as well as personal manipulation, in order to control your world around you I guess I would want to know which part of Shannon'sthinking/agurments/perception would NOT be classified as personal manipulation ... everything I'm saying and perceiving here iscertainly personal manipulation ... I can't imagine how it could beotherwise ...yes. exactly again. i'm not using my argument as accusation but as what i perceive as fact. i do these things as well to manipulate and control my world as much as i can to get what i want. there is a big hidden part of our existence here and now which can be attributed to the fact that the species does really only to things...eat and reproduce. Genes don't care about videoblogging. langauge is a tool. used to manipulate in order to get what you want. I'm pretty sure what you wrote above would constitutelanguage, so, it follows ... well, you know .. I would say that language is the great and fundamental abstractiontool that allows us to function in the world ... and have interesting discussions like this, I might add ...yes yes yes!!!i mean, we use this stuff in our vlogs. we generally talk in a vlog. speak. use our command of linguistics and continue and some of us are better at continuous sprays of dialogue and some are not. but i also look to be inspired. i look for a good model. the medium in a certain sense is so new that the lack thereof is to be expected. i really like your response though. ... well, that was fun ... Richard hey. aren't you the guy that did the piece about the two walnut trees? SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] The One That Pushed Me Over The Edge (was The Shallow Nature of Videoblogging)
Ahhh, yes. That was it. That was the one. I knew it would happen sooner or later. The message thread that might finally shove me clear over the edge as far as this board is concerned. I used to consult the board a lot. There's lots of handy info and tons of cool people who want to help out. Sometimes there's some neat heated debates going on, but too frequently there are just bitchy, snappish back-and-forths, wild oh, but it's so hard to interpret what you really meant in print! Oooh, isn't text just so ineffective?!-type misunderstandings, snippity-do-da's and one-line zingers that clutter up this space and make it feel like a high school..no, wait: a Junior High School cafeteria. Wait: An All-Girls Junior High School Cafeteria (yeah, and that's not sexist. If anyone here has spend any time around 8th grade girls you know what I'm talking about here). I go away for the weekend and come home to quicky scroll through the messages and find this half-baked, faux-profound, vlogger-baiting bullshit? An I'm so shallow, you're so shallow, too thread? Why would anyone want to participate in that? That didn't feel like an invitation to a conversation about the meaning of meaning, and the subsequent posts sure didn't read like productive conversation and I'm damn surprised so many people joined in the non-fun. ...making salad ? ...takes a meaningless swing. ? ...casey only stepped in to make a point that casey exists ? I feel like we've got this message group chock full of people who have are hell-bent on communication via videoblogging or otherwise and yet I look at this board and I'm astonished at the consistent lack of communication! I don't feel the need to defend my apparent lack of depth to someone who asks her questions in some bizarre haiku-ish format just because she saw a video that made her go oooh and she realized that so many other videos don't make her go ooh, and I'm not posting this message to prove I exist. What are you getting at? I post therefore I am? Take that desperatly-wishing-to-be-existential, cranky, vague, meaningless thread about meaning and cram it. You know what? Kiss my vlog-ass. Ponder that. I've hit my message-board wall. And, no...I won't likely vlog about it. It would probably end up shallow since all we're really doing is attaching meaning to meaningless things in order to get what we want from others. Bekah -- http://missbhavens.blogspot.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Vloggercon Preparation Photos
Know y'all are busy packing. Probably too busy to vlog it, but ponder a still photo to add to the Flickr Vloggercon Photo Pool, yo. http://www.flickr.com/groups/vloggercon/ Less than one week, folks. XO, Jan -- http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://the-hold.blogspot.com - poetry http://dagnyhemingway.blogspot.com - machinima http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] The One That Pushed Me Over The Edge (was The Shallow Nature of Videoblogging)
xoxox, Bekah. I know how you feel. This thread almost put me over the edge, too. Went straight to being personally insulted. Then remembered not to take much of anything anywhere from anybody personally. We can all use a periodic reminder that deleting threads in their entirety is not only okay but often part of wise newsgroup strategy. You're okay. I'm okay. Shannon's okay. Comes with the newsgroup territory. See ya in SF. Jan P.S. Shannon is a fella. :) -- http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://the-hold.blogspot.com - poetry http://dagnyhemingway.blogspot.com - machinima http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media On Jun 4, 2006, at 4:26 PM, missbhavens1969 wrote: Ahhh, yes. That was it. That was the one. I knew it would happen sooner or later. The message thread that might finally shove me clear over the edge as far as this board is concerned. I used to consult the board a lot. There's lots of handy info and tons of cool people who want to help out. Sometimes there's some neat heated debates going on, but too frequently there are just bitchy, snappish back-and-forths, wild oh, but it's so hard to interpret what you really meant in print! Oooh, isn't text just so ineffective?!-type misunderstandings, snippity-do-da's and one-line zingers that clutter up this space and make it feel like a high school..no, wait: a Junior High School cafeteria. Wait: An All-Girls Junior High School Cafeteria (yeah, and that's not sexist. If anyone here has spend any time around 8th grade girls you know what I'm talking about here). I go away for the weekend and come home to quicky scroll through the messages and find this half-baked, faux-profound, vlogger-baiting bullshit? An I'm so shallow, you're so shallow, too thread? Why would anyone want to participate in that? That didn't feel like an invitation to a conversation about the meaning of meaning, and the subsequent posts sure didn't read like productive conversation and I'm damn surprised so many people joined in the non-fun. ...making salad ? ...takes a meaningless swing. ? ...casey only stepped in to make a point that casey exists ? I feel like we've got this message group chock full of people who have are hell-bent on communication via videoblogging or otherwise and yet I look at this board and I'm astonished at the consistent lack of communication! I don't feel the need to defend my apparent lack of depth to someone who asks her questions in some bizarre haiku-ish format just because she saw a video that made her go oooh and she realized that so many other videos don't make her go ooh, and I'm not posting this message to prove I exist. What are you getting at? I post therefore I am? Take that desperatly-wishing-to-be-existential, cranky, vague, meaningless thread about meaning and cram it. You know what? Kiss my vlog-ass. Ponder that. I've hit my message-board wall. And, no...I won't likely vlog about it. It would probably end up shallow since all we're really doing is attaching meaning to meaningless things in order to get what we want from others. Bekah -- http://missbhavens.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Links SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Idea for a Special Videoblogging Day
Hey Folks, I want to throw an idea out and see if anyone would be interested in taking part. August 12th is Home Movie Day, a worldwide celebration of home movies in old film formats - 16mm, 8mm, Super 8. It's a chance for people with old films to get information about preserving their films from archivists. It's also a really cool event where you find out the old guy next door used to be an olympic volleyball official. See my latest post http://www.aaronvaldez.com/vlog Anyway, not everyone lives in a city that is hosting an event so I'd like to see if there are any videobloggers with old home movies that they'd like to post on August 12th. If you don't have any of your home movies on video you can download and edit something from the Prelinger archives at the Internet Archive. If you live in a city that is hosting a Home Movie Day screening I encourage you to attend and interview some of the filmmakers. If anyone out there would like to create a website and manage the Day's submissions for future reference please let me know. This is a really important event and I thought it would be an interesting fusion between old and new technologies that both explore community, personal/local history, and so-called amateur filmmaking. More info on Home Movie Day at http://www.homemovieday.com I am not affiliated with Home Movie Day or the Center for Home Movies. I host an event in Iowa City, Iowa. --Aaron Valdez http://aaronvaldez.com/vlog http://valdezatron.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: The One That Pushed Me Over The Edge (was The Shallow Nature of Videobloggin
Shit happens. This groaning of shallowness shall also pass. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahhh, yes. That was it. That was the one. I knew it would happen sooner or later. The message thread that might finally shove me clear over the edge as far as this board is concerned. I used to consult the board a lot. There's lots of handy info and tons of cool people who want to help out. Sometimes there's some neat heated debates going on, but too frequently there are just bitchy, snappish back-and-forths, wild oh, but it's so hard to interpret what you really meant in print! Oooh, isn't text just so ineffective?!-type misunderstandings, snippity-do-da's and one-line zingers that clutter up this space and make it feel like a high school..no, wait: a Junior High School cafeteria. Wait: An All-Girls Junior High School Cafeteria (yeah, and that's not sexist. If anyone here has spend any time around 8th grade girls you know what I'm talking about here). I go away for the weekend and come home to quicky scroll through the messages and find this half-baked, faux-profound, vlogger-baiting bullshit? An I'm so shallow, you're so shallow, too thread? Why would anyone want to participate in that? That didn't feel like an invitation to a conversation about the meaning of meaning, and the subsequent posts sure didn't read like productive conversation and I'm damn surprised so many people joined in the non-fun. ...making salad ? ...takes a meaningless swing. ? ...casey only stepped in to make a point that casey exists ? I feel like we've got this message group chock full of people who have are hell-bent on communication via videoblogging or otherwise and yet I look at this board and I'm astonished at the consistent lack of communication! I don't feel the need to defend my apparent lack of depth to someone who asks her questions in some bizarre haiku-ish format just because she saw a video that made her go oooh and she realized that so many other videos don't make her go ooh, and I'm not posting this message to prove I exist. What are you getting at? I post therefore I am? Take that desperatly-wishing-to-be-existential, cranky, vague, meaningless thread about meaning and cram it. You know what? Kiss my vlog-ass. Ponder that. I've hit my message-board wall. And, no...I won't likely vlog about it. It would probably end up shallow since all we're really doing is attaching meaning to meaningless things in order to get what we want from others. Bekah -- http://missbhavens.blogspot.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Idea for a Special Videoblogging Day
Great idea; I have space to host a WordPress vlog (with vPIP), I just send you an email. blips http://Vlogassist.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, valdezfilm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Folks, I want to throw an idea out and see if anyone would be interested in taking part. August 12th is Home Movie Day, a worldwide celebration of home movies in old film formats - 16mm, 8mm, Super 8. It's a chance for people with old films to get information about preserving their films from archivists. It's also a really cool event where you find out the old guy next door used to be an olympic volleyball official. See my latest post http://www.aaronvaldez.com/vlog Anyway, not everyone lives in a city that is hosting an event so I'd like to see if there are any videobloggers with old home movies that they'd like to post on August 12th. If you don't have any of your home movies on video you can download and edit something from the Prelinger archives at the Internet Archive. If you live in a city that is hosting a Home Movie Day screening I encourage you to attend and interview some of the filmmakers. If anyone out there would like to create a website and manage the Day's submissions for future reference please let me know. This is a really important event and I thought it would be an interesting fusion between old and new technologies that both explore community, personal/local history, and so-called amateur filmmaking. More info on Home Movie Day at http://www.homemovieday.com I am not affiliated with Home Movie Day or the Center for Home Movies. I host an event in Iowa City, Iowa. --Aaron Valdez http://aaronvaldez.com/vlog http://valdezatron.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] is this camera broken?
My Canon ZR80 cheapie camcorder has started showing horizontal lines on playback (maybe recording, too - can't tell). I bought a head cleaning tape and ran it through three times - no change. Any ideas what might be wrong? The Canon site is no help. -- best regards, Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] The One That Pushed Me Over The Edge (was The Shallow Nature of Videoblogging)
Condolences on the loss of your videocamera. I know how frustrating that is! At least I have my digital camera as back-up, but it is going to be very long time before I am able to replace my video camera.On 6/4/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snippity-do-das? Love it! My new word of the day!Speaking of words, my videocamera just broke. I guess I'm back to plain old text blogging for a while, until I can afford to replace it.On 6/5/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahhh, yes. That was it. That was the one. I knew it would happen sooner or later. The message thread that might finallyshove me clear over the edge as far as this board is concerned. I used to consult the board a lot. There's lots of handy info and tons of cool people who want to help out. Sometimes there's some neat heated debates going on, but too frequently there are just bitchy, snappish back-and-forths, wild oh, but it's so hard to interpret what you really meant in print! Oooh, isn't text just so ineffective?!-type misunderstandings, snippity-do-da's and one-line zingers that clutter up this space and make it feel like a high school..no, wait: a Junior High School cafeteria.--best regards,Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now.http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Bev Sykeshttp://funnytheworld.comHappiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
