[videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?
Are we recreating the Hollywood monster? Well, if the monster is a monster who needs recognition and validation for the work it has labored over, if it is the monster of ideas and creation, then yes. But as long as the internet is free, so is the monster. Our monster is not behind a walled garden, our monster is constantly recreated with a great story, a camera and an internet connection. As long as that is true, and as long as we keep the conversation open, our monster is pretty bad ass. http://www.zadidiaz.com/home/2009/3/31/1st-annual-streamy-awards-once-in-a-lifetime.html And to think i almost posted something insulting! Zadi's post here changed my mind. Cheers! Sull [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Video blogging history/evolution
So cool... I can scan the chapter I wrote in my book if you'd like and email it to you. Jay [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, gintaras.miskinis gintaras.miski...@... wrote: Hello, Are there in this group any posts or links to the sources where I could find historical events in video blogging? I tried google'ing, but the most valuable source as I have found is - Jay Dedman's videoblogging book, where, however, I missed history (detailed) chapter... Hi, I've got a couple of recent posts with history in them. Fans, Friends Followers. Building an audience and a creative career in the Digital Age by Scott Kirsner http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2009/03/fans-friends-followers-building.html Interview with Sunny Gault http://stevegarfield.com/Site/About_Me.html Jimmy Fallon talks with Steve Garfield about his new show, Late Night With Jimmy Fallon http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/2009/01/jimmy-fallon-talks-with-steve-garfield-about-his-new-show-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon.html --Steve
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Here are the community's collected links to articles (some of them mainstream) about videoblogging and videobloggers. http://delicious.com/search?context=allp=vloggersinthenewslc=1 Since this comes up, anyone can tag an article in delicious to have it added to the collection :) Jan Jan McLaughlin Production Sound Mixer air = 862-571-5334 aim = janofsound skype = janmclaughlin On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Steve Garfield st...@offonatangent.comwrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, gintaras.miskinis gintaras.miski...@... wrote: Hello, Are there in this group any posts or links to the sources where I could find historical events in video blogging? I tried google'ing, but the most valuable source as I have found is - Jay Dedman's videoblogging book, where, however, I missed history (detailed) chapter... Hi, I've got a couple of recent posts with history in them. Fans, Friends Followers. Building an audience and a creative career in the Digital Age by Scott Kirsner http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2009/03/fans-friends-followers-building.html Interview with Sunny Gault http://stevegarfield.com/Site/About_Me.html Jimmy Fallon talks with Steve Garfield about his new show, Late Night With Jimmy Fallon http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/2009/01/jimmy-fallon-talks-with-steve-garfield-about-his-new-show-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon.html --Steve Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Here's some more info: http://vlogumentary.pbwiki.com/ On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Jan McLaughlin jannie@gmail.com wrote: Here are the community's collected links to articles (some of them mainstream) about videoblogging and videobloggers. http://delicious.com/search?context=allp=vloggersinthenewslc=1 Since this comes up, anyone can tag an article in delicious to have it added to the collection :) Jan Jan McLaughlin Production Sound Mixer air = 862-571-5334 aim = janofsound skype = janmclaughlin On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Steve Garfield st...@offonatangent.comwrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, gintaras.miskinis gintaras.miski...@... wrote: Hello, Are there in this group any posts or links to the sources where I could find historical events in video blogging? I tried google'ing, but the most valuable source as I have found is - Jay Dedman's videoblogging book, where, however, I missed history (detailed) chapter... Hi, I've got a couple of recent posts with history in them. Fans, Friends Followers. Building an audience and a creative career in the Digital Age by Scott Kirsner http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2009/03/fans-friends-followers-building.html Interview with Sunny Gault http://stevegarfield.com/Site/About_Me.html Jimmy Fallon talks with Steve Garfield about his new show, Late Night With Jimmy Fallon http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/2009/01/jimmy-fallon-talks-with-steve-garfield-about-his-new-show-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon.html --Steve Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://michaelverdi.com
[videoblogging] JW Flash Player - auto HD/SD
I haven't played with it yet but a new JW Flash Player is out that supports automatic switching between HD and SD depending on a viewer's connection. http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player/ - Verdi -- http://michaelverdi.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:10 PM, ultimco...@gmail.com ultimco...@gmail.com wrote: 2 or 3 years ago i made a graph here http://www.flickr.com/photos/loiezd/2068174027/sizes/o/ I forgot about this graph. added to our wiki: http://www.flickr.com/photos/loiezd/2068174027/sizes/o/ For people of East Europe the Vlogeurope group is also a good history http://www.vlogeurope.com/blog/ Yes... Loiez, Raymond, Gabriel, Mark, and other in Europe have helped push ideas through Vlogeurope. Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com http://twitter.com/jaydedman 917 371 6790
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
What connects to YouTube community, I think that those who started blogging didn't feel the real joy of the video blogging start, like felt you people (I guess), who had began from technical issues, and ending with philosophical. In a sense, Youtubers' generation had everything put on the plate.. By the way, are there many people in Lithuania who are posting videos online? If so, can you send any links? Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com http://twitter.com/jaydedman 917 371 6790
Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?
Oops. last sentence should read: If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we agree than on partisan rancor. 2009/4/1 Jeffrey Taylor thejeffreytay...@gmail.com The Streamys were far from perfect, but there were as many steps in the right direction as there were in the same or wrong direction. If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we create partisan rancor. 2009/3/31 Michael Sullivan sullele...@gmail.com Are we recreating the Hollywood monster? Well, if the monster is a monster who needs recognition and validation for the work it has labored over, if it is the monster of ideas and creation, then yes. But as long as the internet is free, so is the monster. Our monster is not behind a walled garden, our monster is constantly recreated with a great story, a camera and an internet connection. As long as that is true, and as long as we keep the conversation open, our monster is pretty bad ass. http://www.zadidiaz.com/home/2009/3/31/1st-annual-streamy-awards-once-in-a-lifetime.html And to think i almost posted something insulting! Zadi's post here changed my mind. Cheers! Sull [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Jeffrey Taylor 912 Cole St, #349 San Francisco, CA 94117 USA Mobile: +14157281264 Fax: +33177722734 http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor http://organicconversations.com -- Jeffrey Taylor 912 Cole St, #349 San Francisco, CA 94117 USA Mobile: +14157281264 Fax: +33177722734 http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor http://organicconversations.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?
The Streamys were far from perfect, but there were as many steps in the right direction as there were in the same or wrong direction. If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we create partisan rancor. 2009/3/31 Michael Sullivan sullele...@gmail.com Are we recreating the Hollywood monster? Well, if the monster is a monster who needs recognition and validation for the work it has labored over, if it is the monster of ideas and creation, then yes. But as long as the internet is free, so is the monster. Our monster is not behind a walled garden, our monster is constantly recreated with a great story, a camera and an internet connection. As long as that is true, and as long as we keep the conversation open, our monster is pretty bad ass. http://www.zadidiaz.com/home/2009/3/31/1st-annual-streamy-awards-once-in-a-lifetime.html And to think i almost posted something insulting! Zadi's post here changed my mind. Cheers! Sull [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Jeffrey Taylor 912 Cole St, #349 San Francisco, CA 94117 USA Mobile: +14157281264 Fax: +33177722734 http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor http://organicconversations.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?
Yeah, but the first version was funnier. On 1-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Jeffrey Taylor wrote: Oops. last sentence should read: If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we agree than on partisan rancor. 2009/4/1 Jeffrey Taylor thejeffreytay...@gmail.com The Streamys were far from perfect, but there were as many steps in the right direction as there were in the same or wrong direction. If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we create partisan rancor. 2009/3/31 Michael Sullivan sullele...@gmail.com Are we recreating the Hollywood monster? Well, if the monster is a monster who needs recognition and validation for the work it has labored over, if it is the monster of ideas and creation, then yes. But as long as the internet is free, so is the monster. Our monster is not behind a walled garden, our monster is constantly recreated with a great story, a camera and an internet connection. As long as that is true, and as long as we keep the conversation open, our monster is pretty bad ass. http://www.zadidiaz.com/home/2009/3/31/1st-annual-streamy-awards-once-in-a-lifetime.html And to think i almost posted something insulting! Zadi's post here changed my mind. Cheers! Sull [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Jeffrey Taylor 912 Cole St, #349 San Francisco, CA 94117 USA Mobile: +14157281264 Fax: +33177722734 http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor http://organicconversations.com -- Jeffrey Taylor 912 Cole St, #349 San Francisco, CA 94117 USA Mobile: +14157281264 Fax: +33177722734 http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor http://organicconversations.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] reuters looking for recession videos
Reuters is looking for stories about people who are thriving despite the recession. Have you started a business, changed your career for the better or found pleasure in a different pace of life? Send a short video about your experience to Reuters Your View and we'll publish the best ones. reuters.com/news/globalcoverage/survivingrecession People can email videos to p...@reuters.com or upload videos here: http://www.reuters.com/news/yourView/upload Feel free to contact me with questions!
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Ah, the good old Wikipedia Vlogging article. It actually got nominated for deletion years ago due to a lack of reliable sources. I decided to clean it up and begin contributing sources to it and I managed to change the outcome of the vote. Let's just say it was a..uh..thankless job. :) I haven't contributed to it in years though and I agree that it has gone to shit. Pardon my merde. Let us know what you find. oh and watch out for Godwin's Law around this here town. pd On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:26 PM, gintaras.miskinis gintaras.miski...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@... wrote: Unfortunately, reliability has been a point of contention. Some in this group may remember the dramedy trying to write the wikipedia page for videoblogging. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging Newspapers/magazines must write about it for it to be reliable. Makes a certain kind of sense. You got to capture the mainstream to be recognized. It's like a vetting process. Ive also learned that the history of videoblogging is wide and varied depending on what community you look at. This group has its own specific timeline that differs from people who began through Youtube exclusively. I can scan the chapter I wrote in my book if you'd like and email it to you. Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com http://twitter.com/jaydedman 917 371 6790 Thank you for your reply too. It's an honor for me to be contacted from the book author :) I made some thinking after I had read your shared thoughts and just have to agree: it is sad, that sources, which are not mainstream, cannot be trusted..well, officially. But on the other hand, a year ago, when I was writing a term paper about video blogging evolution I used your mentioned wikipedia link, and this year, I thought that I could use my a year ago written info in the final paper, and when rechecked wikipedia - saw, that most of the facts where different then I had found a year ago...it was experience from practical side on my own.. What connects to YouTube community, I think that those who started blogging didn't feel the real joy of the video blogging start, like felt you people (I guess), who had began from technical issues, and ending with philosophical. In a sense, Youtubers' generation had everything put on the plate.. However, I would be very grateful if you could scan your mentioned chapter and send it to me (to this yahoo mail if possible). You would help me a lot. Thanks again and sorry for my English. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Cue mass googling of Godwin's law. That's funny. I liked this from the Wikipedia entry for Godwin's law: In a Christmas Day review of The Spirit, New York Times movie critic A.O. Scott suggested that a similar axiom to Godwin's Law, applied to Hollywood, would stipulate that every movie star must eventually dress up in a German military uniform. On 1-Apr-09, at 11:44 AM, Patrick Delongchamp wrote: Ah, the good old Wikipedia Vlogging article. It actually got nominated for deletion years ago due to a lack of reliable sources. I decided to clean it up and begin contributing sources to it and I managed to change the outcome of the vote. Let's just say it was a..uh..thankless job. :) I haven't contributed to it in years though and I agree that it has gone to shit. Pardon my merde. Let us know what you find. oh and watch out for Godwin's Law around this here town. pd On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:26 PM, gintaras.miskinis gintaras.miski...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging %40yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@... wrote: Unfortunately, reliability has been a point of contention. Some in this group may remember the dramedy trying to write the wikipedia page for videoblogging. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging Newspapers/magazines must write about it for it to be reliable. Makes a certain kind of sense. You got to capture the mainstream to be recognized. It's like a vetting process. Ive also learned that the history of videoblogging is wide and varied depending on what community you look at. This group has its own specific timeline that differs from people who began through Youtube exclusively. I can scan the chapter I wrote in my book if you'd like and email it to you. Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com http://twitter.com/jaydedman 917 371 6790 Thank you for your reply too. It's an honor for me to be contacted from the book author :) I made some thinking after I had read your shared thoughts and just have to agree: it is sad, that sources, which are not mainstream, cannot be trusted..well, officially. But on the other hand, a year ago, when I was writing a term paper about video blogging evolution I used your mentioned wikipedia link, and this year, I thought that I could use my a year ago written info in the final paper, and when rechecked wikipedia - saw, that most of the facts where different then I had found a year ago...it was experience from practical side on my own.. What connects to YouTube community, I think that those who started blogging didn't feel the real joy of the video blogging start, like felt you people (I guess), who had began from technical issues, and ending with philosophical. In a sense, Youtubers' generation had everything put on the plate.. However, I would be very grateful if you could scan your mentioned chapter and send it to me (to this yahoo mail if possible). You would help me a lot. Thanks again and sorry for my English. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
howdy Gintaras, what is sad to me (as someone who video Blogs documentary/news pieces) is this line of thought (which is not unique to you) that mainstream is trustworthy and independent is not. it is sad, that sources, which are not mainstream, cannot be trusted..well, officially. ~~ If mainstream was trustworthy I would NEVER have been a video blogger. It was the main reason I choose to do this. You might want to be as skeptical of the mainstream as you are of independents. MAINSTREAM is controlled by the major corporations of the world and they give information biased to benefit their corporations at the cost of the truth and they will DENY this until death much like politicians. Independents Media sources are also biased but not toward the Corporate agenda. They are more openly biased, like an advocate. Solidarity, ~FluxRostrum homebase http://Fluxview.com ~ current project http://MobileBroadcastNews.org ~~~ NOTICE: NOTHING HAS CHANGED. Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection. ~~~ -- Powered By Outblaze
[videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Hi, I totally agree with you. My words, that you cite is the attitude of my paper's chief and even university, because when student writes a scientific work, he must use, well, let's say the mainstream media and (or) scientific literature . In this case, as I've been searching for history events in video blogging, I haven't found any (except Jay Dedman's) trusty sources, that I could use like: one author says, that video blogging started that way, that year, etc., second author says, that video blogging started absolutely not like that, like said first author - that's called information sources analysis (of literature/journal's/posts). In this case, I just cannot compare, cite forum posts and put them in bibliography list, which is very formal...For me, as student and citizen, it is no difference: is it mainstream or not. In mainstream I can hear the official side of the fact/topic, and in the blog I can find the backstage of the same fact/topic, and the information I find on the blog, is up to me - to trust or not (search for more info, etc.). However, tomorrow, I'm going to meet my chief, and we will discuss about that, and the results of trustworthy and not sources I will write here...Thanks for posting ! --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ~ FluxRostrum fluxrost...@... wrote: howdy Gintaras, what is sad to me (as someone who video Blogs documentary/news pieces) is this line of thought (which is not unique to you) that mainstream is trustworthy and independent is not. it is sad, that sources, which are not mainstream, cannot be trusted..well, officially. ~~ If mainstream was trustworthy I would NEVER have been a video blogger. It was the main reason I choose to do this. You might want to be as skeptical of the mainstream as you are of independents. MAINSTREAM is controlled by the major corporations of the world and they give information biased to benefit their corporations at the cost of the truth and they will DENY this until death much like politicians. Independents Media sources are also biased but not toward the Corporate agenda. They are more openly biased, like an advocate. Solidarity, ~FluxRostrum homebase http://Fluxview.com ~ current project http://MobileBroadcastNews.org ~~~ NOTICE: NOTHING HAS CHANGED. Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection. ~~~ -- Powered By Outblaze
[videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, gintaras.miskinis gintaras.miski...@... wrote: Hi, I totally agree with you. My words, that you cite is the attitude of my paper's chief and even university, because when student writes a scientific work, he must use, well, let's say the mainstream media and (or) scientific literature . In this case, as I've been searching for history events in video blogging, I haven't found any (except Jay Dedman's) trusty sources, that I could use like: one author says, that video blogging started that way, that year, etc., second author says, that video blogging started absolutely not like that, like said first author - that's called information sources analysis (of literature/journal's/posts). In this case, I just cannot compare, cite forum posts and put them in bibliography list, which is very formal...For me, as student and citizen, it is no difference: is it mainstream or not. In mainstream I can hear the official side of the fact/topic, and in the blog I can find the backstage of the same fact/topic, and the information I find on the blog, is up to me - to trust or not (search for more info, etc.). However, tomorrow, I'm going to meet my chief, and we will discuss about that, and the results of trustworthy and not sources I will write here...Thanks for posting ! Just wanted to add, that a qualitative/trusty source, is a source which is written by a scientist or other person who is accepted by the society, i.e. has a expertise in branch. As I see, he must at leased published a book? (nonsense). Anyway, starting to get a headache of this unique case...
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Truth is a dead tree. On 1-Apr-09, at 1:18 PM, gintaras.miskinis wrote: Just wanted to add, that a qualitative/trusty source, is a source which is written by a scientist or other person who is accepted by the society, i.e. has a expertise in branch. As I see, he must at leased published a book? (nonsense). Anyway, starting to get a headache of this unique case... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSEaHyzbqTA On 1-Apr-09, at 1:35 PM, Rupert wrote: Truth is a dead tree. On 1-Apr-09, at 1:18 PM, gintaras.miskinis wrote: Just wanted to add, that a qualitative/trusty source, is a source which is written by a scientist or other person who is accepted by the society, i.e. has a expertise in branch. As I see, he must at leased published a book? (nonsense). Anyway, starting to get a headache of this unique case... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
By the way, are there many people in Lithuania who are posting videos online? If so, can you send any links? Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com http://twitter.com/jaydedman 917 371 6790 There aren't many, actually. Written blogs are really popular, but video - hm...There are some: http://marketingasinternete.wordpress.com - about marketing on the internet. In my opinion not very professional, because there are a lot of twaddle and not much valuable information. http://www.zuokas.lt/category/video-kronika/page/2/ - some video posts of Lithuania's famous politician. Videos are uploaded very irregularly (what is common for all lithuanian video bloggers if we could name them like that). http://www.skamp.lt/ - music band blog. Actually, there are quite qualitative videos that I liked. http://www.zipfm.lt/putiklis/?laid-pava=2kate=9paie-zodi=fail-tipa=-1 - local dj's and radio show manager's video blogs. Last year, I also tried to put some entries on our local country's youtube, and observed the reactions, which wrote in my paper..But I cannot call it a successful project. Just a few videos: http://www.videogaga.lt/user/bwoy. Briefly, I can say, that there are no professional video blogers (maybe except skamp.lt) in our country, that I could name even waken up in the middle of the night and that those blogs would be at least regular...
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video blogging history/evolution
Last year, I also tried to put some entries on our local country's youtube, and observed the reactions, which wrote in my paper..But I cannot call it a successful project. Just a few videos: http://www.videogaga.lt/user/bwoy. To me, this is what it's all about. We can email back and forth like this in textbut now we can actually see your face and hear you talk. If you took your camera outside, you could introduce us to your family and your world. As cheesy as it sounds, that's really the big deal here. It can be as revolutionary as we want it to be. Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com http://twitter.com/jaydedman 917 371 6790