Re: [videoblogging] Encoding In 3GP
My advice would be to forget 3GP. I'm working on a project that was originally going to support 3GP, but we decided to abandon it, because it doesn't make sense for us to chase every device that can play video. We decided that we will take a different route and only support the iPhone, iPod Touch and higher-end Nokia S60 devices. Yes, there are plenty of other devices, but we'd rather target the handsets whose owners are likely to afford the data plans needed to enjoy videos on the go and provide them with nice H.264 content instead of crappy 3GP content. The 3GP-enabled phones are used by the non-tech savvy majority who will never watch our content because they don't know how or can't afford the prices the operators are asking for data transfer. Rather that waste our time on creating crappy videos that nobody'll watch, we are focusing our efforts on producing high-quality videos for those who are interested and can afford to download them. Just my $0.02 -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50168432081 Twitter: http://twitter.com/devguide RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/devguide-net
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Leo's site
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mike Meiser groups-yahoo-...@mmeiser.com wrote: Sad to hear. :( I'm assuming he was running wordpress? I've seen way to many wordpress blogs hacked. The problem is just maintence, you have to keep wordpress constantly up to date to patch security holes. If you don't it will inevitably get hacked. Same goes for all server side open source. You are being naive, Mike. It has nothing to do with the software being open or closed source. Maintenance is not a problem, it is what you have to do. Maintenance and backups. Make sure you backup your site every time you post a new episode of your show. Here's a good piece of information on how to make backups of your MySQL database via phpMyAdmin. http://www.siteground.com/tutorials/php-mysql/mysql_export.htm Many times I've wanted to redo my blogger.com blog in wordpress, indeed wordpress is simply better, but the truth is blogger.com is virtually hack proof since there's absolutely no server side code running. It's all handled Oh, boy. Where do we begin? blogger.com does run server-side code. A weak password is platform-independent. Sftp does not prevent hackers from getting at your blog, because there are other ways. Passwords: sftp protects them in transit, but there are other ways of getting in, like dictionary attacks. A weak password will let the bad guys in no matter what tools you use. A colleague of mine had her Google account hacked a couple of weeks ago. The reason was a weak password. Google account are used to authenticate the users of Blogger. Here's another story of a password being hijacked using another method: http://www.davidairey.com/google-gmail-security-hijack/ Buffer overflows: will help the hackers get at a site without breaking in via FTP. Sometimes posting a carefully crafted piece of code in a comment form will be all that's required to pull the pants off your site's butt. XSS: can be used to hijack passwords/user information. SQL injection: a skilled hacker can delete your database without breaking into your account, if the code does not do extensive checks. All he/she has to do is send SQL commands to delete your database. They don't need to know the username/password, because the blogging software that communicates with the database behind your blog already knows both... the database trusts the software and deletes your data. It's beautifully simple if the blogging software doesn't clean the data it passes to the database. And let's not forget those nice Web 2.0/Java things and plug-ins. The more of that crap you put on your site, the higher the likelihood of someone finding a way to break into it. by blogger.com and written to the server via sftp. I've really come to appreciate this rock solid security and ZERO maintenance, and to be honest it's the primary reason I simply recommend blogger over wordpress to anyone who wants to self host on their own domain. The exception being if they're a developer and already running code on their server, in which case they're probably aware enough of the maintenance issues to run wordpress. Lately I've been doing a lot of work in the bike industry and it seems the entire industry from shop owners, to racers to bike makers runs almost exclusively on a blogspot hosted ecosystem. It simply works. I'm sorry Mike, but I wouldn't go to the bike industry for security advice. Using SFTP is good higene, but it is not a replacement for a vaccine. P.S. a good auto-backup system or version control system for your blog is a MUST if you run wordpress. A lot of hosting providers include this stock. Off-site backup is a better solution. If it means burning a DVD with a backup of your database and all files and taking it to a safe place, so be it. -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50168432081 Twitter: http://twitter.com/devguide RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/devguide-net Our latest book: Mastering OpenOffice.org Calc http://www.devguide.net/books/moooc1 vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 [ sent from my MacBook Wheel ]
Re: [videoblogging] should youtube just start a new brand for Pro Content?
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:10 PM, @sull sullele...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone think that at this point YouTube/Google should just start a new site (company) specifically for Pro Content (professionally produced entertainment) and just promote the hell out of it on Youtube.com and various other Google owned sites/pages? Let YouTube continue to be the Broadcast Yourself service and filter out their partner content? Why mix it all together? Curious of your thoughts. sull No. Why should they do that? If they decide to separate 'pros' from 'amateurs' all they need to do is re-design the home page and add a 'pro' content tab or preference cookie. -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50168432081 Twitter: http://twitter.com/devguide RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/devguide-net Our latest book: vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1
Re: [videoblogging] REC wanted for PPV Streaming service
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Nerissa Oden thevideoqu...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyone using an affordable web service (or program) that allows for PPV of a live streaming event? This is different than the more common PPV on-demand achived video file. Even a good work-around suggestion like selling a link to hidden page containing the live feed? I am currently using mogulus for live feed of our community tv station, see here-- http://www.upstartbastrop.com/bcat_stream.html Thanks in advance for your recommendations! Nerissa ustream.tv, mogulus pro, justin.tv have a password-protect feature, you can sell passwords stickam has payperlive.com hope this helps -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50168432081 Twitter: http://twitter.com/devguide RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/devguide-net Our latest book: vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1
Re: [videoblogging] Making QT reference movies on a PC
Try eZedia QTi for Windows (there's a free trial): http://www.ezedia.com/products/eZediaQTI/ -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv
[videoblogging] VideoCue 2.7.1
Hi, I'm playing with VideoCue 2.7.1 for Mac and it seems to have cured the problems that 2.7 had with audio and video. So, if you've been turned off by weird audio problems and loud fan noise when using the built-in iSight camera, you should try 2.7.1. -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:28 PM, @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do they NEED TO GET IT? Why do we feel like we NEED THEM TO GET IT? Co-Existing not feasible? Is this about getting picked up by the old suits or is this about Independents being able to leverage technology to publish their works and fins a market? You are absolutely right. We don't need them. I don't understand why independent producers want the NBCs of this world to hire them or join the revolution. Funk them. If it is about money, then charge money for your shows, do a premium paid content channel to accompany what you are giving away for free, create and sell courseware, books, DVDs, reach out to small businesses who cannot afford to advertise on the big networks. Help them create brand following on the Internet. Take a look at Gary Vaynerchuk's Wine Library TV or Stormhoek http://www.stormhoek.com/blog/ Whining about big bad networks with get you nowhere. -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:01 AM, @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: of interest... http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/13/online-video-wheres-the-money/ Is advertising the only way to monetize on-line videos that all those bright people in the Valley can think of? I watched one of the Web 2.0 gurus recently admit that the startups need to experiment with new revenue models now, like... e-commerce. -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type
But who says the networks have any obligation to hire the independents? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because people who deserve to be paid well for their excellent work are not getting their due. That is all. -Original Message- From: @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip Why do they NEED TO GET IT? Why do we feel like we NEED THEM TO GET IT? Co-Existing not feasible? Is this about getting picked up by the old suits or is this about Independents being able to leverage technology to publish their works and fins a market? -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Jeffrey Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They don't have an obligation to independents at all, but they're being massively stupid for missing out on opportunites to take on serialized content that has establushed communities that are alpha-recommending products and services left and right. Networks miss out, content creators miss out, time is wasted, common sense goes by the wayside. Both sides are hurting in their own ways with inprecedented losses and/or difficulty finding revanue. Frustrating to the max, considering it doesn't have to be like this. Being compared to cat pissing on toilet videomakers is ego-related, but it certainly doesn't help the situation to be seen by so-called tastemakers this way. So yeah, they don't owe us anything, but it doesn't make the siutation any less absurd. I really wonder why do you care? If they don't get it, they will have a worthy competitor soon and that's that. May the best show win. The rest is irrelevant. A guy from the Annenberg/USC presented here yesterday, and says the way hi surveys are going, it seems that people will save TV for large events like the opening ceremony of the Olympics and other things that people want to I would say even that is not guaranteed. If you have watched Leo Laporte's 24 Hours with iPhone you have already seen the future. The Olympics will be televised for as long as there will be sponsors who are willing to pay the big bucks to the TV stations, who in turn pay the IOC for the exclusive broadcast rights. As soon as the audience moves on-line, the advertisers will follow and so will IOC. see in full view, everything else is fair game to be mobilized and will be increasigly viewed that way. Teenagers are already watching full feature films on iphones willingly and happily. See? They already know. Funk the networks. Enjoy your freedom. Do you really want those spin masters to understand what we are doing? Do you really want some idiot telling you what you can and cannot say on your show? Do you really miss the gag that the big corporate advertisers are putting on the media? 2008/11/14 Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] We, what time are you meeting??? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]jacekartymiak%40gmail.com wrote: But who says the networks have any obligation to hire the independents? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]thejeffreytaylor%40gmail.com thejeffreytaylor%40gmail.com wrote: Because people who deserve to be paid well for their excellent work are not getting their due. That is all. -Original Message- From: @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] sulleleven%40gmail.comsulleleven% 40gmail.com snip Why do they NEED TO GET IT? Why do we feel like we NEED THEM TO GET IT? Co-Existing not feasible? Is this about getting picked up by the old suits or is this about Independents being able to leverage technology to publish their works and fins a market? -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv -- Roxanne Darling o ke kai means of the sea in hawaiian Join us at the reef! Mermaid videos, geeks talking, and lots more http://reef.beachwalks.tv 808-384-5554 Video -- http://www.beachwalks.tv Company -- http://www.barefeetstudios.com Twitter-- http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Jeffrey Taylor Mobile: +33625497654 Fax: +33177722734 Skype: thejeffreytaylor Googlechat/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1 devGuide.tv http://devguide.tv
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type
I know. The money thing. It's a big problem, when you don't have it and I don't want to trivialize it, as I personally know how it feels when you don't have it and can't tell when it will be coming. In times like these you need to scale down and work within the limitations of the format. I had to do it several times in recent years, it is possible. For example, when I started the first audio podcast in Poland in 2005, I though I could imitate Adam Curry. It just wasn't possible. I gave up on free stuff and decided to develop a line of commercial training videos. Which is not as glamorous as signing a seven-figure deal with a major network, but it offers me a piece of mind and flexible working hours. It counts when you have a small child and a debilitating disease that strikes at you when you least expect it several times a year. I wouldn't count on networks funding the independent producers. Unfortunately, it looks like the money's drying out and the independents have little chance to get a piece of it. On the other hand, we've already seen some major deals so I'm bullish on on-line video. But to see more money pumped into on-line video production and distribution we have to wait for another bubble, just like the Web 2.0 guys now have to make friends with e-commerce and build some useful stuff, it is time for the indies to do the work that pays they bills while working on their portfolios on a side. I think the next bubble will make a lot of new media content producers rich and famous, we just have to be patient. I understand you very well when you write that you are angry when the major networks' bosses laugh at what you strongly believe in, but in times like these it's worth to remember what Ghandi used to say: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win They can no longer ignore us, so they laugh at us. Next, they will fight us, then we'll win. It's only a matter of time. When I started writing computer books, people used to tell me I was an idiot: how a Polish guy living in Lublin, Poland (check in on Google Maps) could possibly write a computer book in English, publish it in the USA, and make money? Guess what? That's what I did with StarOffice for Linux Bible published in 2000 by IDG. Not bad. When I wrote in 1998 a long article on the future of print on demand (POD), people told me again I was an idiot. In 2003 I started a small POD business, again all while living in Poland. I'm selling my work on all international Amazon.com sites, Barnes Noble, and many other on-line stores. This year I'm launching an on-line training business and people are telling me I'm an idiot again! :) Why am I telling you all of this? To show you that you should be doing your own thing, build your audience, and the guys with the money will find you. That is what I did. I started writing articles and speaking at local conferences. I was writing for the local computer press, local edition of Playboy, newspapers, etc. Then I started writing computer books for the US publishers, then, once I found out that the money was in publishing, not in writing books, I decided to write and self-publish my own books. All of that has led to very nice training contracts with Fortune 200 companies. Sure, I am not a world-famous writer and I don't have blond long-legged groupies trying to rip my pants off and sell it on eBay, but life is still not that bad. Just do your own stuff, retain all rights if possible, don't be shy about doing something for money, you may actually learn something. And, above all, listen to your audience. My audience told me to continue writing articles after I wrote my first one. Which I did. Then they told me to write and self-publish a book on the same subject. Which I did. Then, they asked me to do training, in-person and on-line. I am not going to say 'no.' Don't worry about the money. Worry about the free or nearly-free distribution channels disappearing. This is how the major networks may try to fight us, by closing those down, but they will not win. There are far too may bright coders with too much free time on their hands to let that happen. And don't get angry at networks' bosses stupidity. You don't want a wise competitor with boatloads of cash. You *want* your competition to be stupid. Jacek On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really enjoy saying all the thing you do as well, Jacek. The problem is that it's time the funding sources of all types stop seeing this as experimental and something for later. The goods are there NOW. -Original Message- From: Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:04:07 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Jeffrey Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They don't have an obligation to independents at all, but they're being massively stupid for missing out
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What Ive found most annoying is the halfhearted way that those who have received some backing, have been treated. We've seen several shows get picked up by new media networks who then seem to have no clue what to do with them, and eventually bail out. Either they have little idea what they are doing, or the shows themselves dont have the potential that was thought, maybe both. I think this situation is actually quite simple to explain. The shows that had a lot of followers on the Internet did not bring their audience with them over to the TV networks. At the same time, the TV networks' audience did not know anything about those new bright things. The next time a TV network does a deal with a show distributed on the Internet, they have to do three things at the same time: a) heavily invest in growing the internet-based audience, b) heavily invest in promotion of the new shows on their networks, do Jay Leno, Larry King, Howard Stern, David Letterman, the whole kaboodle c) publish the shows both on-line and on the TV networks at the same time, simultaneously. Or, in other words, make them stars, not cheap labour. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really enjoy saying all the thing you do as well, Jacek. The problem is that it's time the funding sources of all types stop seeing this as experimental and something for later. The goods are there NOW. -Original Message- From: Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:04:07 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Jeffrey Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They don't have an obligation to independents at all, but they're being massively stupid for missing out on opportunites to take on serialized content that has establushed communities that are alpha-recommending products and services left and right. Networks miss out, content creators miss out, time is wasted, common sense goes by the wayside. Both sides are hurting in their own ways with inprecedented losses and/or difficulty finding revanue. Frustrating to the max, considering it doesn't have to be like this. Being compared to cat pissing on toilet videomakers is ego-related, but it certainly doesn't help the situation to be seen by so-called tastemakers this way. So yeah, they don't owe us anything, but it doesn't make the siutation any less absurd. I really wonder why do you care? If they don't get it, they will have a worthy competitor soon and that's that. May the best show win. The rest is irrelevant. A guy from the Annenberg/USC presented here yesterday, and says the way hi surveys are going, it seems that people will save TV for large events like the opening ceremony of the Olympics and other things that people want to I would say even that is not guaranteed. If you have watched Leo Laporte's 24 Hours with iPhone you have already seen the future. The Olympics will be televised for as long as there will be sponsors who are willing to pay the big bucks to the TV stations, who in turn pay the IOC for the exclusive broadcast rights. As soon as the audience moves on-line, the advertisers will follow and so will IOC. see in full view, everything else is fair game to be mobilized and will be increasigly viewed that way. Teenagers are already watching full feature films on iphones willingly and happily. See? They already know. Funk the networks. Enjoy your freedom. Do you really want those spin masters to understand what we are doing? Do you really want some idiot telling you what you can and cannot say on your show? Do you really miss the gag that the big corporate advertisers are putting on the media? 2008/11/14 Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] We, what time are you meeting??? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]jacekartymiak%40gmail.com wrote: But who says the networks have any obligation to hire the independents? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]thejeffreytaylor%40gmail.com thejeffreytaylor%40gmail.com wrote: Because people who deserve to be paid well for their excellent work are not getting their due. That is all. -Original Message- From: @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] sulleleven%40gmail.comsulleleven% 40gmail.com snip Why do they NEED TO GET IT? Why do we feel like we NEED THEM TO GET IT? Co-Existing not feasible? Is this about getting picked up by the old suits or is this about Independents being able to leverage technology to publish their works and fins a market? -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed. http://www.devguide.net/books
[videoblogging] Moving on to other podcasting ventures, selling old domains
I'm moving on to other podcasting ventures and getting rid of these domains: vlogger.pl: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=130081595534 podcasting.pl and other 7 domains: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=130081547263 -- Jacek Artymiak
[videoblogging] ScreenSaverCast.com: yes, we are delivering podcasts as screensavers
Some of you will think this is crazy, but we started publishing a new kind of podcast, a screensavecast at http://www.screensavercast.com. Enjoy! -- Jacek Artymiak ScreenSaverCast.com ScreenSaverCast.com/rss SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Programming iTunes for Windows (Perl) book preview
hi all, devGuide.net will be publishing my book about programming Apple iTunes for Windows with Perl this week. The book will be available in two formats: PDF and printed. I see there is already a page for the book on the website and one sample chapter: http://www.devguide.net/books/itunes-win-perl-01-ed/index.html PDF: http://www.devguide.net/books/itunes-win-perl-01-ed/itunes-win-perl-01-02.pdf Thought you might be interested in a little preview. -- Jacek Artymiak podcasting.pl SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Dreamhost $9.24/ yr is back
Did you pay 9.24 or 9.24 + 49.99? On 1/27/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i tried it and it worked fine. the service looks good. the catch is that after one year you are supposedly hooked and now have to pay the normal monthly fees which aren't bad, but not the cheapest around. also, they might eventually interest you into dedicated hosting, which, again is not the cheapest around. i figured for $9.24, i could use it for scratch space, check out Dreamhost and wordpress since everyone seems to like them and grab a new domain name. so i did. of course, in a year, the competition will be offering 10x more for 1.95/month ;) markus Ronen wrote: What's the catch here? On 1/26/06, bleedxapathy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dammit! i just used Deal90 this week! On 1/26/06, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Go to http://dreamhost.com Select: the L1 Crazy Domain Insane hosting plan. Before you checkout, you will see an option to enter your promo code. Enter 777 which will reduce your total from $119.24 to $9.24. I signed up an hour or two ago, no problem. -Patrick --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i see nothing offered for the price you state please give a link to the actual page that mentions this offer -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://node101.org http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- Jacek Artymiakpodcasting.pl SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
