Re: [videoblogging] Screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista
You can also try CamStudio. It wasn't anywhere as clean as Camstasia in its operation. There's other cheap/free stuff you find at CNET.com under the downloads section. Use the keyword "screencapture" when you go looking. Camtasia is also really good for all the extra features. The tutorials are pretty handy too. Does anyone else on the forum use Camtasia? Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2008 8:10:14 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista Shane just told me about an open source app, Jing. It is/was limited to 10 mins but works on Mac and PC. http://www.jingproj ect.com/ Aloha, Roxanne On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:32 AM, John Esberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: > I use Camtasia 5 all the time. It works great for me. Give it a try on > their 30 day trial. > > Till Later, > > John Esberg > JohnEsberg.com > > - Original Message > From: RICHARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: videoblogging@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2008 11:27:24 AM > Subject: [videoblogging] Screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista > > Can anybody recommend screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista? > > For the Mac, I use iShowU, which is cheap and works really well. > > I intend to boot into Windows XP on my MacBook Pro and use the Windows > equivalent screen recording software. My client doesn¹t support Macs on > their network and I need to record clear video to show web pages for > tutorials, etc. I¹ve tried using a video camera and the output from a > switcher, but neither is clear enough for my purposes. The video I captured > from iShowU is crystal clear and is exactly what they want. I just need > screen recording software for Windows so I can join their network and > record > the screen. > > The video will be edited in Final Cut Pro 6. > > Thanks, > > Richard > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Roxanne Darling "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian Join us at the reef! Mermaid videos, geeks talking, and lots more http://reef. beachwalks. tv 808-384-5554 Video --> http://www.beachwal ks.tv Company -- > http://www.barefeet studios.com Twitter--> http://www.twitter. com/roxannedarli ng [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista
I use Camtasia 5 all the time. It works great for me. Give it a try on their 30 day trial. Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: RICHARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2008 11:27:24 AM Subject: [videoblogging] Screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista Can anybody recommend screen recording software for Windows XP/Vista? For the Mac, I use iShowU, which is cheap and works really well. I intend to boot into Windows XP on my MacBook Pro and use the Windows equivalent screen recording software. My client doesn¹t support Macs on their network and I need to record clear video to show web pages for tutorials, etc. I¹ve tried using a video camera and the output from a switcher, but neither is clear enough for my purposes. The video I captured from iShowU is crystal clear and is exactly what they want. I just need screen recording software for Windows so I can join their network and record the screen. The video will be edited in Final Cut Pro 6. Thanks, Richard [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] the i-Tunes part -
Now there's a great question! Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: liza jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 1, 2008 2:08:42 PM Subject: [videoblogging] the i-Tunes part - anybody got any success stories selling vlogs on i-Tunes? how about giving them away there? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] hi, i'm new here.
You mentioned PG-13 material being pulled. What about G rated stuff? Same thing when some has it out for you? Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 1, 2008 12:28:51 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] hi, i'm new here. How did Youtube respond when you told them about Synchmaster? I hate to hear stuff like that. We get individual videos pulled from sites all the time (especially Veoh and Revver), but have never had an entire account deleted. Sounds like this Synchmaster person probably has it out for you. Youtube is full of drama like that. Also, I'd consider letting one of the full-length videos run free as well, to give people a taste of a storyline. On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM, liza jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: > i found this group thru blip.tv. we at dyna-flix.com make silly > movies in the style of the 1966 Batman on TV: think spandex and > deathtraps and double entendres galore. > > here's the link to the 91 or so clips on blip, teaser promos for our > 37 fifteen minute chapters on the market. we set these videos free > to roam the world however they may as they lead back to our for > profit (hopefully) website where the full length videos are for > sale. we don't care who does what as long as our URL shows up > somewhere. > > http://thedaredolld ilemmas.blip. tv > > our website: www.dyna-flix. com > > yes, we are on the verge of being profitable, due to the following > factors: > - dynahunk has been making these 'niche' productions since almost > before anyone and had an established world wide following over the > net. > -i just happen to own a pole barn which makes a great studio > -we own our work completely. all our actors/actresses are masked and > the voices are all dubbed, making the resulting character a pastiche > of efforts owned by us. yes, an individual has rights regarding the > distribution of their own image, but we are selling a compounded > character. all the scripts, music, costumes, deathtraps, EFX, etc. > are all created in house. > -there are a whole lot of people around the world who really like our > source of inspiration - TV Batman - and enjoy our productions. > > thanks for the discussion here about i-Tunes and Blip. i am not much > of a consumer of media, and have never used i-Tunes. i have read > about it as a powerhouse for selling music, but do videos sell there > as well? or is a blip.tv crosspost to i-Tunes another chance to give > away our teasers? > > and from what i have read here - most of august's posts- perhaps here > i can get some information about why we keep getting deleted from > youtube. like our source material which was broadcast we are PG-13 > at our worst, no sex, no violence, no nudity. we got up to a million > views in about 4 months two years ago and then got deleted across the > board. we started another account, took about 5 months to get up to > a million views and got summarily deleted again. > > about a dozen acounts deleted now. all from complaints from someone > or something named "Synchmaster" . now it is a game with us, seeing > how long we can have an account up before synchmaster hits us again. > > anybody got an inside view of why youtube hates us? > > > - - -- > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] hi, i'm new here.
Liza, I'll tell you this, your line about "just so happen to own a pole barn" cracks me up. Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: liza jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 1, 2008 11:16:05 AM Subject: [videoblogging] hi, i'm new here. i found this group thru blip.tv. we at dyna-flix.com make silly movies in the style of the 1966 Batman on TV: think spandex and deathtraps and double entendres galore. here's the link to the 91 or so clips on blip, teaser promos for our 37 fifteen minute chapters on the market. we set these videos free to roam the world however they may as they lead back to our for profit (hopefully) website where the full length videos are for sale. we don't care who does what as long as our URL shows up somewhere. http://thedaredolld ilemmas.blip. tv our website: www.dyna-flix. com yes, we are on the verge of being profitable, due to the following factors: - dynahunk has been making these 'niche' productions since almost before anyone and had an established world wide following over the net. -i just happen to own a pole barn which makes a great studio -we own our work completely. all our actors/actresses are masked and the voices are all dubbed, making the resulting character a pastiche of efforts owned by us. yes, an individual has rights regarding the distribution of their own image, but we are selling a compounded character. all the scripts, music, costumes, deathtraps, EFX, etc. are all created in house. -there are a whole lot of people around the world who really like our source of inspiration - TV Batman - and enjoy our productions. thanks for the discussion here about i-Tunes and Blip. i am not much of a consumer of media, and have never used i-Tunes. i have read about it as a powerhouse for selling music, but do videos sell there as well? or is a blip.tv crosspost to i-Tunes another chance to give away our teasers? and from what i have read here - most of august's posts- perhaps here i can get some information about why we keep getting deleted from youtube. like our source material which was broadcast we are PG-13 at our worst, no sex, no violence, no nudity. we got up to a million views in about 4 months two years ago and then got deleted across the board. we started another account, took about 5 months to get up to a million views and got summarily deleted again. about a dozen acounts deleted now. all from complaints from someone or something named "Synchmaster" . now it is a game with us, seeing how long we can have an account up before synchmaster hits us again. anybody got an inside view of why youtube hates us? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blitzkrieg VIdeo Release
Hah! You crack me up! Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 8:03:29 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blitzkrieg VIdeo Release Surely: Pre-roll, overlay, post-roll? That's how I'm going to describe it to my wife from now on, anyway. On 21-Aug-08, at 5:00 PM, ractalfece wrote: tension, climax, post-roll? --- In videoblogging@ yahoogroups. com, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tension, climax, relief? > > On 21-Aug-08, at 2:28 PM, Brook Hinton wrote: > > I cannot resist. > > Mr. Street, what are the two or more emotions that French Maid TV > seeks to > move through emotionally compelling content? > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Tim Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > French Maid TV has 8 How To videos that usually get between 1 to 5 > > million views per video. > > > > The trick is to build emotionally compelling content that moves > two of > > more emotions have spectacle... and story if you can work it in. > > > > Tim Street > > Creator/Executive Producer > > French Maid TV > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Add French Maid TV to Your iTunes @ > > http://frenchmaidtv .com/itunes > > http://1timstreet. com > > http://twitter. com/1timstreet > > > > > > On Aug 21, 2008, at 1:18 PM, jamezscript wrote: > > > > > Has anybody had success producing a shit-load of videos > > > and releasing them all at once? I know the Ask A Ninja > > > Guy's did this... I'm finding it increasingly difficult > > > to build an audience/brand with just a handful of videos. > > > Thinking even if you've got something entertaining you need > > > at least 20 vids to make a mark these days? Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > -- > _ _ _ _ ___ > Brook Hinton > film/video/audio art > www.brookhinton. com > studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton. com/temporalab > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Do you trust what you see?
Hi Everyone, I used to have faith in reporters, whether they be print or photographic. Now that I've had experience in so much of life, I don't trust them any farther than I can throw them. I have yet to read something in a newspaper that is actually accurate when I know the background on the story first hand. Granted many of the journalists may be busy with a heavy work load and a multitude of projects, but often I smell laziness when I see reporters working right in front of me. Whether they are trying their best or not, it burns me when I see news media outlets claim accuracy. It's usually a dead giveaway that they're not. Till Later, John Esberg JohnEsberg.com - Original Message From: Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:32:48 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Do you trust what you see? Interesting article today about photojournalism, but I think it also applies to video as well. I always think about criminal cases, when does someone alter a digital photo to achive their desired results? This is the stuff that scares me about technology, especiality digital tech http://www.newsweek .com/id/152989 When a mysterious creature washed up on the shores of Montauk, N.Y., in late July, it became an instant media sensation. After the photograph of the Montauk Monster ran on Manhattan media blog Gawker, local Long Island newspapers were on the story. CNN and Fox News quickly followed, hosting experts to hash out what exactly this unrecognizeable being was. Perhaps a bloated raccoon, as Discover Magazine claimed and Jeff Corwin told Fox? A dead dog that had decayed for weeks? Or, the latest spin: The creature was simply fake, a prop in a movie's viral marketing campaign, and the media had been duped. The public's skepticism over whether or not they can believe what they see in photographs isn't unwarranted. Just last week, Beijing organizers admitted to using "previously recorded footage" and computerized images during the Olympic opening ceremony to enhance the quality of fireworks for broadcast on television. A month before that, a doctored photograph of Iranian missiles turned up on front pages across the globe. The alterationan extra missile added to the imagewas outed within hours of the photograph's publication. "With technology, you can make the moment anything you want it to be," says John Long, the ethics committee chair for the National Press Photographers Association. "Our credibility has been stretched in so many ways, so I don't think the public has a great deal of faith in us." He admits the past year hasn't been the best for photojournalism' s credibility but doesn't think the future is particularly gloomyit just puts the burden on the photojournalist to tell the truth, rather than on the photograph itself. "Just like we trust the reporter to represent what they see accurately, we're going to have to develop that same relationship with photographers, " he says. NEWSWEEK's Sarah Kliff spoke with Long about why the credibility of photojournalism has fallen, whether or not doctored photographs are more likely to get caught these days, and how photographers can reclaim the public's trust. Excerpts: for the rest of the article follow the link http://www.newsweek .com/id/152989 Heath http://batmangeek. com http://heathparks. com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
