[videoblogging] Decoding the HTML 5 video codec debate

[T.Whid]

via Daring Fireball

http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/07/decoding-the-html-5-video-codec-debate.ars

[videoblogging] The Question of Freedom at the Open Video Conference

[T.Whid]

FYI
http://rhizome.org/editorial/2739


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] My Wordpress 2.01 blog on Dreamhost has been Hacked!

[T.Whid]

I'm not that familiar with WP so I don't know where the password is
stored, this is just a tip off the top of my head...

Find out where the password is stored. If it's stored in the database
you'll need to login to the database (either via command line, SSH
perhaps, or phpMyAdmin I think DH provides this tool) and use a SQL
directive to change it (since it's probably stored in an encryped
way).

If it's stored in a flat file somewhere (i doubt it), then just FTP in
and change it there.

You probably need to check that the database configuration file for WP
still has the proper values as well. I'm not certain the name of the
file where this config is set, maybe wp-config.php ??

Good luck

On 2/11/06, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just discovered my vblog has been hacked by "Kid Fantasy" and am
> unable to login as Admin.
>
> An FTP into the blog/ directory shows all the files are still there.
>
> There is some discussion on Google and the Forums about the problem,
> but nothing that I can get a handle on and fear trial and error fixes
> might make thing worse.
>
> I've e-mailed Dreamhost support, but the last time it was days before
> they got back me.
>
> Bottom line: I've looked into all the self-help options, but no luck.
>  I am new to MySQL & PHP so any help or pointers in getting my vblog,
> back online would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you...
>
> -Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] QT compression: High quality at low bit rates

[T.Whid]

via Digg

Haven't tried it but might be helpful for some folks.

http://urlx.org/wikicities.com/a794

--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] new media art commissions: any artist vloggers out there?

[T.Whid]

"Rhizome is pleased to announce that [...] between eight and eleven
new Internet art projects will be commissioned in 2006.

The fee for each commission will range from $900 – $3,000 (that's USD)."

(Rhizome.org is an organization that promotes new media art.)

More here:

http://rhizome.org/commissions/

It would be nice to see a vlogger score some of that cash.

In the past there have been residency requirements for these grants
(the Jerome foundation only funds artists living in NY and Minnesota
for example) but I don't see anything about it on the site this year.

Best,

--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Changing your iTunes URL

[T.Whid]

find the info on this page:http://www.apple.com/itunes/podcasts/techspecs.htmlChanging Your Feed URL
		Podcasters occasionally need to
move their feed from one location to another. In this case, you should
not remove your feed. If possible, you should set your web server to
return a 301 error and redirect when receiving a request for the old
feed. Doing so will cause both the iTunes Music Store and the iTunes
clients that have subscribed to your podcast to pick up the new feed
URL. Be sure to maintain the redirect for at least two weeks to ensure
that most subscribers have attempted to download your most recent
episode and have thereby received the new URL.
		If you don't know how to return an HTTP 301, you can use the >
tag described in the iTunes RSS Tags section below. The tag will cause
the iTunes music store to be updated with the new feed URL, but it will
not inform iTunes clients of the new location. You may choose to
include an audio note in your podcast, informing your subscribers that
your podcast has changed locations. After adding the tag, be sure to
keep your feed running at the old URL for at least 48 hours.On 2/7/06, Brett Gaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


Whats a surefire way to switch your iTunes URL that will keep both your
old users subscribed, and update the music store?  If you put a
redirect in your .htaccess file, will that work?  I had an xml on
my server that I was manually updating, but then I realized this was
stupid and that I could do this automatically with blip.  So, I
want the people who've subscribed to the one on my server to get
redirected to blip, and I want the music store people to get moved
there, too.  I didn't really get the "return 302" thing that
iTunes talked about in their help page - where they heck do I type that
info in?

Thanks
Brett-- ---Brett Gaylorhttp://www.etherworks.ca
http://www.homelessnation.org





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  



Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  


Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rocketboom Changes?

[T.Whid]

Andrew thinks the show is worth $50 - $150, that doesn't make it so
(or not so). There is a market for online video advertising and the
price is much lower than $50. Andrew  believes that RB-type of video
is a whole new market that hasn't had a price set for it yet (please
correct me if I'm wrong).

That's the purpose of an auction, it creates the price. The price is
what the market decides it wants to pay for it. Of course, Andrew
doesn't have to accept whatever this price turns out to be.

On 2/7/06, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely. There is no incentive for Andrew and Amanda to accept
> less than the true market value of their space. They have the option
> of going through ad agencies to get that if they want.
> --
>
> On Feb 7, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Ms. Kitka wrote:
>
> > Well, $15,000 isn't a lot of money for a high profile show like
> > Rocketboom.  As Andrew has previously mentioned, RB has already been
> > talking about CPMs from $50-150.  If this is so, why would RB submit
> > to such a low paycheck when they're already having offers of much
> > more?
> >
> > If you take the minimum $50 CPM, that makes $50,000/week.  Doesn't it
> > make $15,000 look like charity?
> >
> > Kitka
>

--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Has RB Started A Trend In WebVideo Advertising?

[T.Whid]

I agree with Michael, I don't see the logic in Josh's statement.I agree that there aren't that many vlogs or podcasts that could garner the amount of money we're seeing in the RB action ($15k right now, reserve not met). But RB can and will be able to do it again. 
Sure, the first company that buys the ad space will get some free press so perhaps the price will be inflated on this first auction. But if RB continues this means of ad sales a price will stabilize out of it and it might surprise us all how much that price is...
On 2/2/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Josh,Care to ellaborate why you think *if* this auction is a success that it cannot be duplicated again for at least 1 of the several remaining weeks in 2006? For that matter, even if this auction does not work agreements cannot be made etc... then why would this hinder future attempts at finding an auction winner that rboom can and will work with?
Thanks,SullOn 2/2/06, Joshua Kinberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Hate to be a naysayer, but I doubt it will work as well for anyone except RB, and it will likely only work for them this once. This is why its good to be an innovator... "first" only happens once.-Josh


On 2/1/06, Ronen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> wrote:



All those guys with 'vlog magic' infomercials online can now add this step to their innovativie easy-to-use five step program, lolOn 2/1/06, 
Kunga <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:






Here we go... The genie is out of the bottle now.
--  
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http://FutureMedia.org
RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia
iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87

On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Jack Olmsted wrote:

> Inspired by Rocketbooms three day success auctioning off 5-days of  
> advertising time in March through eBay, Technology Evangelist has  
> set up their own eBay page for exclusive ad placement in five of  
> their upcoming HD videos.
>
> -Jack
> http://view-point.blogspot.com




  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.



 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 



[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service



.



  















  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  




Individual
  
  



Fireant
  
  



Use
  
  





Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.


 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 


[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service


.



  











  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.

 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service

.



  








-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -"The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory
http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator 


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  


Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Daily Vodcasts???

[T.Whid]

you could try blocking requests from that domain...

On 1/31/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if it's an automated feed. If you post a blog/vlog critical
> of Daily Vodcasts, would it appear there?
>
>   -- Enric
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Ms. Kitka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know how to contact the webmaster of DailyVodcasts.com?
> > He has been taking the Kitkast RSS feed, along with the RSS feeds of
> > other videoblogs, and re-posting everything on his web site without
> > permission or credit to the vloggers who made them.
> >
> > I tried searching his site on WhoIS, but the owner's information is
> > private.  I would appreciate any information that you would be able to
> > provide.
> >
> > Go check to see if your feed is being aggregated too.  I know that he
> > is also aggregating the feeds of Suicide Girls and This or That TV...
> > but there are dozens of other posts per day.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] for Movie Maker users...

[T.Whid]

A Microsoft developer who blogs much is trying to talk the Movie Maker
developers into blogging.

Perhaps some vloggers using Movie Maker would be interested in posting
comments/encouragement?

here:

http://urlx.org/retrosight.com/052f

--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] YouTube

[T.Whid]

I believe the TOU for YouTube are a suckers deal.Here's Flickr's relevent bit (actually part of the Yahoo! TOU) YouTube *is* the Flickr of video afterall:With respect to photos, graphics, audio or video you submit or make
available for inclusion on publicly accessible area of the Service
other than Yahoo! Groups, the license to use, distribute, reproduce,
modify, adapt, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on
the Service solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted
or made available. This license exists only for as long as you elect to
continue to include such Content on the Service and will terminate at
the time you remove or Yahoo! removes such Content from the Service.+++I am not a lawyer but this is how I read it:YouTube claims a license to use your content anyway they deem fit forever and ever in any part of the world just by you submitting the content to the service. Whereas Yahoo (Flickr) will only "license to use, distribute, reproduce,
modify, adapt, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on
the Service solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted
or made available." and this right is rescinded as soon as either of you decides to remove it form the service.YouTube could conceivably create a 'YouTube Greatest Hits" DVD ("prepare derivative works of".. "in any media format") and sell it worldwide ("any media channel") and the content creators would get bupkis ("royalty-free"). Of course you could make your own DVD and they wouldn't be able to stop you ("non-exclusive"). They are granting themselves every right you have to your work, with no way for you to revoke those right. They generously allow you to keep those rights, what a deal!
On 1/24/06, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So my basic issues with the service as it is right now are:1. The Terms of Use. Specifically, "For clarity, you shall retain all of your ownership rights in
your User
Submissions. However, by submitting the User Submissions to YouTube,
you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, fully paid-up,
royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, sublicenseable and transferable
license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of,
display, perform and otherwise exploit the User Submissions in
connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its successor's)
business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing
part or all of the YouTube Website (and derivative works thereof) in
any media formats and through any media channels." The way I read that is you are giving them the right to do whatever they want with your work - even profit from it or licensce it to someone else - without necessarily including you in the deal.
Am I misinterpreting this?-- www.mteww.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: What's up with Apple and RSS?

[T.Whid]

what's up with that itpc protocol? wtf is that? oh i see, it launches
iTunes. What happens if you don't have iTunes? anybody want to check?

When you create the page in iweb does it ask you what protocol you
would like to use?

Casual and new users publishing with iweb won't know what the dealio
is anyway, if this itpc thing is the default, most users of iweb will
simply publish their xml urls using that protocol.

This is surely f'd up IMHO.

On 1/20/06, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cheers for the confirmation. Yes I agree its almost certainly cos they
> didnt want to get into the whole database thing,b ut what this really
> means is that they arent getting into many of the things that make a
> blog a blog, and a blog publishing system a blog publishing system.
>
> It sounds like iWeb is really just a sort of 'personal website creator
> ' simplesoft like has been around for years, but theyve stolen some of
> the brand and style from blog developments in recent years. Not
> dissimilar to what theyve done with podcasting etc.
>
> .Mac, your own personal slice of the internet circa 1996
>
> Just as bad as Microsoft, just with slightly better style &
> propaganda, and quicker to hijack new phenomenon.
>
> Steve of Elbows
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > iWeb = no comments
> >
> > I'm guessing they didn't want to mess with databases?
> >
> > On 1/20/06, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Apple are turning into selfish polluters of many modern web
> > > developments if you ask me!
> > >
> > > Youve got iWeb so tell me is it true, that theyve included 'blog'
> > > stuff but not as we know ie, ie no comment system!?!
> > >
> > > I can see why for technical reasons it would be harder to include a
> > > comment system, but really, argh, if Apple carry on at this pace they
> > > will have bastardised everything we take forgranted by the end of
> 2006!
> > >
> > > Steve of Elbows
> > >
> > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So we've talked many times about the weird stuff Apple added to RSS
> > > for use
> > > > in the iTunes store.
> > > > Then today I read this about it's new Photocasting thing:  > > >
> http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2148908/rss-community-blasts-apple >
> > > > So I figured I'd give that iWeb thing a try and see what kind of RSS
> > > feed I
> > > > got. Well here is my result: http://michaelverdi.com/iwebtest
> > > > It the
> > > > site works but neither iTunes nor FireAnt recognize the feed as
> > > valid. Also
> > > > they way they structure the link to the RSS feed will prevent most
> > > people
> > > > from using it in anything other than iTunes - NOT COOL!
> > > > -Verdi
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> > > > R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> > > > Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> > > > Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> > R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> > Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> > Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] blogger to wordpress

[T.Whid]

FWIW

I agree, you should keep the old account (esp if it's free) and add a
big notice at the top to go to the new home page of the blog.

You don't want to break all the links that are probably indexed in
search engines, linked from other sites, etc, etc.

By forwarding to the front of a new site, you force folks to search
for the content they were looking for when they get there. Give 'em
what they're looking for first, then let them decide if they want to
continue to explore your site.

best,



On 1/18/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just so that what I mean is clearer ...
>
> That block of text can appear WITH the origional content (not simply
> in place of it).  That way old permalinks that dont get updated can
> still find the content - and a handy reminder that they're at an
> out-dated url.
>
>
> (Although you could do something more advanced with JavaScript to
> redirect individual old permalinks to their new location on the new
> site, it would be a much bigger deal (you'd have to have a page at the
> new site that would do some work and basically map old permalinks to
> new ones).  My personal thought is that it would be easiest to put up
> a banner "we've moved" sign, but still leave the old content available
> ... that way old links and cached feed entries will still be valid.)
>
> On 1/18/06, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  what do other people think? is it better to redirect to the new site or is
> > it better to have a block of text that reads "this site has moved"?
> >
> >
> > On 1/18/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Blogger does allow it, you can add a meta refresh to the html header
> > > that will send any request for the old site to the new one ...
> > >
> > > however ... you may not want to do that, Josh. You may want to leave
> > > the old site there (its free right?) that way all your permalinks
> > > still point to the video posts people have linked to.
> > >
> > > You could alter the template to display some sort of "This site has
> > > moved, please update your bookmarks / links" or whatever.
> > >
> > > if you do want to redirect the old site just edit your template and
> > > add the following line to the  portion:
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > - Dave
> > > On 1/18/06, T.Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > You would need to set that up on blogger somewhere. If you wanted to
> > > > simply forward to your front page you could do it with JS in your
> > > > blogger template (are you allowed to edit the template?).
> > > >
> > > > The best way to do it would be on the server-side. But I assume
> > > > blogger doesn't offer that service.
> > > >
> > > > On 1/18/06, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > >  hey gang,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am starting to redesign my site and move from blogger  to
> > wordpress
> > > > >
> > > > > I know that i can import comments and posts and that i can have
> > > > > joshleo.blogspot.com forward to joshleo.com/vlog (new blog frontpage)
> > when
> > > > > it is up and running. and I know that the old post permalinks will not
> > > > > forward to my new permalinks but i am still unsure if old permalinks
> > forward
> > > > > to the standard site. example:
> > > > > joshleo.blogspot.com/01/2005/josh-is-cool.html to
> > > > > joshleo.com/vlog (The new wordpress blog front page)
> > > > >
> > > > > I know it wont forward to the post but hopefully the permalinks will
> > forward
> > > > > somewhere? maybe the blog front page?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Josh Leo
> > > > >
> > > > > joshleo.com
> > > > >  stonefarm.blogspot.com
> > > > > joshspicks.blogspot.com
> > > > > vlogcats.blogspot.com
> > > > > wearethemedia.com
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> > > > >
> > > > >  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
>

Re: [videoblogging] blogger to wordpress

[T.Whid]

Hi,

You would need to set that up on blogger somewhere. If you wanted to
simply forward to your front page you could do it with JS in your
blogger template (are you allowed to edit the template?).

The best way to do it would be on the server-side. But I assume
blogger doesn't offer that service.

On 1/18/06, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  hey gang,
>
> I am starting to redesign my site and move from blogger  to wordpress
>
> I know that i can import comments and posts and that i can have
> joshleo.blogspot.com forward to joshleo.com/vlog (new blog frontpage) when
> it is up and running. and I know that the old post permalinks will not
> forward to my new permalinks but i am still unsure if old permalinks forward
> to the standard site. example:
> joshleo.blogspot.com/01/2005/josh-is-cool.html to
> joshleo.com/vlog (The new wordpress blog front page)
>
> I know it wont forward to the post but hopefully the permalinks will forward
> somewhere? maybe the blog front page?
>
> --
> Josh Leo
>
> joshleo.com
>  stonefarm.blogspot.com
> joshspicks.blogspot.com
> vlogcats.blogspot.com
> wearethemedia.com
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

[T.Whid]

I think it's interesting that someone is trying a slightly (and it is
slight) different format. It's more akin to Channel Frederator than a
video blog.

We'll see how it works. It's my opinion that lots of folks will
probably be interested in a short, edited clip show.

On 1/16/06, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  On 1/16/06, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think I am more of a fan of picking out my own content. That is
> > the beauty of video on the web...the options. If I wanted someone
> > else picking out what was cool for me to watch I could just turn on
> > TV? No?
>
> This is very true.  If what you wanted to watch existed on the TV, then that
> would be the place you would watch it.
>
> The point here is that this stuff isn't made for the TV, it's made for The
> PAN.
> Eventually, in a predetermined time period, we are going to have 100%
> original content made specifically for The PAN.  We just don't have the
> resources to do it yet.
>
> Until then, we find videos that we want to watch, and think that other
> people would want to watch, and put them in the feed.  It's a matter of
> taste though, and if you don't like the stuff we're putting in there from
> other people, you probably won't like the stuff we're creating originally
> either.
>
> The beauty of video on the web, for me, is that you can do whatever the fuck
> you want.
>
> From your statements, can I assume that you watched the 1st video and were
> unimpressed by our content?
>
> AQ
>
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: wmv from quicktime, for free

[T.Whid]

there's a trial period.

http://www.flip4mac.com/wmv_upgrades.htm

On 1/13/06, duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  you may need to call 'em josh.. just tried it, exported a 30sec clip from a
> DV-PAL quicktime out of QT Pro, no problems! played in WMP (only on a Mac so
> far but it seems ok? ).. all free!
> be well
>
> d
>
>
>  On 1/14/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you been able to export the whole movie to WMV with Quicktime?
> > I think it exports the first 10 sec. or so as a trial, but you need to
> > upgrade to Flip4Mac Studio to be able to really export WMV (that costs
> > $99 if I recall... if that's free now then I will definitely be
> > contacting them for my money back as I bought a license several months
> > ago).
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://29fragiledays.blogspot.com >
> http://www.kleindesign.co.uk
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] QuickTime 7.0.1 reinstaller

[T.Whid]

FYI
Apple Releases QuickTime 7.0.1 Reinstaller

Some users are having trouble with the QuickTime 7.0.4 patch released
by Apple Tuesday, prompting the company to request that users restore
QuickTime 7.0.1. The reinstaller is available on the QuickTime support
page.

http://www.macobserver.com/article/2006/01/13.13.shtml
http://www.apple.com/support/quicktime/
--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Windown Media Player For Mac Gonzo?

[T.Whid]

Yeah, they replaced it with Flip4Mac. I haven't been able to get audio
streaming working with Flip4Mac onFirefox or Safari on Mac 10.3.9

Otherwise, Flip4Mac is pretty good.

On 1/13/06, robert a/k/a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>
>  From the ZDnet article:
> "Microsoft has officially halted development of its Windows Media
> Player for the Mac and plans no future Apple Computer versions of its
> music-playing software, CNET News.com has learned."
>
>
> --
> cheers
> r
>
> Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
>
> My Vlog: http://r.24x7.com
> A Good Deal: http://foo.24x7.com
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] no videoblogging in updated iMovie

[T.Whid]

FYI

I'm following the macworld keynote and the imovie demo ended with no
mention of video blogging. The iphoto demo did include a new
photoblogging new feature -- allowing people to blog photos from
iphoto with a .mac account.
--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] more macworld keynote, podcast studio part of Garageband

[T.Whid]

9:48 am Steve demoing Garageband with Podcast studio now.
9:47 am Garageband. New podcast studio. Podcast artwork track. over
200 free jingles and effects. speech enhanccer. use iChat for remote
interviews.

iChat suggests video support possible

http://www.macrumorslive.com/web/
--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Newsvine Out of the Dark

[T.Whid]

If anyone with an invite out there would be so kind as to invite me it
would be much appreciated.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

thx

On 1/6/06, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I want you bill for the UKVloggers, please join, could do with
> your input on video conferences.
>
> Paul
>
> On 6 Jan 2006, at 22:40, Bill Streeter wrote:
>
> > Let me be the first to say I would like an invite.
> >
> >  Bill Streeter
> >  LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> >  www.lofistl.com
> >
> >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com"
> >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Newsvine.com has opened up invitation to a private beta. Here is
> >  some
> >  > background info...
> >  >
> >  > // START QUOTE
> >  > At Newsvine, you can read breaking news from around the world,
> >  write
> >  > your own articles, and publish links from across the web directly
> >  to
> >  > your column. You'll also keep ad revenue from all traffic your
> >  pages
> >  > generate. Feel free to register and select a domain name for
> >  yourself
> >  > (yourname.newsvine.com) whenever you'd like. It's all free of
> >  course.
> >  >
> >  > In order to let all citizens of the Newsvine community control its
> >  > growth and usership, we are keeping access to Newsvine invite-only
> >  for
> >  > the time being. As a reward for bringing positive members into the
> >  > community, you'll receive 10% of the ad earnings from their column,
> >  > which you can either donate to your charity of choice or keep for
> >  > yourself. You have 20 invites for now. You don't have to use all
> >  your
> >  > invites at once. Enter email addresses into this form to start
> >  sending
> >  > invites now.
> >  > // END QUOTE
> >  >
> >  > I've seeded a few in this community and each user is limited to
> >  only
> >  > 20 invites... so ask around. It is still pretty hard to get, but
> >  > you'll be hearing more about this site in the near future.
> >  >
> >  > Not sure what the future plans are (if any) for video.
> >  >
> >  > -Matt
> >  > ---
> >  > http://vlogmap.org
> >  > http://leanbackvids.com
> >  > http://ridertech.com
> >  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Individual
> > Fireant
> > Use
> > Explains
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >   ▪   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> >
> >   ▪   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >   ▪   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
> >
> Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog
>
> http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
>
> It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Questions on Formats to Post for Vlog.

[T.Whid]

One thing the M4V extension does do is that iTunes maps that file
extension to itself. So if you want the file to be double-clicked and
opened in QuickTime, you would prefer the mp4 extension.

My feeling is that Apple invented it specifically to be an iTunes
video file (as opposed to a QuickTime file).

The default behavior (on Firefox and Safari anyway) when opening the
file from a server in a browser, whether it be m4v or mp4 or mov, is
to play it in the QT plugin (as long as the mime type is set correctly
on the server). I think IE's default is to prompt one to download it.

On 1/6/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> iPod will play mov and mp4. It depends more on the resolution and bitrate.
> m4v is not actually anything other than an mp4 with h.264 codec, aac
> audio, and specific resolution and bitrate settings optimized for
> iPod. So really, m4v is a made up file extension. It should actually
> be mp4, as that's really the correct file type. It is often preferable
> to edit the filename replacing .m4v extension with .mp4 as that is
> more accurately what the file *is*.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 1/6/06, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi cheryl,
> >
> > i have been using blip.tv for some time now and am very happy it
> >
> > i notice that some people post their videos there in two formats:
> > quicktime and windows media
> >
> > for myself, i only upload quicktime videos as .mov files, generally
> > using the settings from freevlog.org
> >
> > however, more and more people are now using the iPod m4v format instead
> >
> > it's your call as to how many formats you wish to support
> >
> > i'm always toying with the idea of providing wmv files for Internet
> > Explorer users, but never get around to it (sorry IE users!)
> >
> > markus
> >
> >
> > www.CherylShuman.com wrote:
> >
> > >Dear Vlogging Group,
> > >
> > >I have a question regarding exporting formats. At the moment I have
> > >both PC and Mac. On my Powerbook, the IMovie has a setting direct for
> > >the Video Ipod. I've been exporting in that format as well as Windows
> > >Media. Is there a general rule of thumb for exporting in other
> > >formats? I'm not sure what proper protocol is.
> > >
> > >Also, when I export in Mp4 and .mov format from my new powerbook, it
> > >won't play on last year's Mac. I tried to download the updated
> > >Quicktime pro 7, but it won't download.
> > >
> > >I'm not sure what to do. Does this mean I should export in several
> > >formats or ???
> > >
> > >Also, I recently was told about blip.tv and other distribution
> > >outlets. In the group's opinion, where is the best place to actually
> > >post your videoblogs?
> > >
> > >I would appreciate the feedback. Thank you in advance.
> > >
> > >Happy New Year Everyone.
> > >
> > >Cheryl Shuman
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
> >
> > http://apperceptions.org
> > http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
> > http://node101.org
> > http://spinflow.org
> > http://wearethemedia.com
> > http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com
> >
> > aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > skype: msandy
> > spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: M4V and MOV video formats

[T.Whid]

Does anyone know if Apple recommends an official mime type for M4V?

I'm using video/mp4, I used video/quicktime for a while but browsers
would tack on a .MOV extension when I did that.

On 1/6/06, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> B Yen wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Bill Streeter wrote:
> >
> >> You need to change the server to acknowlege that m4v is a video
> >> format.
>
> > Interesting Note:
> > My podcast "reflects" my video-blog at http://jumplive.blogspot.com,  in
> > the past when you click on a .m4v file (under OSX/Safari) you got  a
> > download of "gibberish characters".  Now, it plays fine using QT  player.
> >
> > Does this mean Apple is steadily getting the .m4v "integrated as a
> > solution"?  I.e., eventually you don't have to change .m4v to .mp4?
>
> Most likely it means that the people who run the server got around to
> adding m4v with the proper mime-type. The "gibberish characters" you
> mention is due to the fact that most installs of Apache (and other web
> servers I'd guess) do not know what an 'm4v' file is, so they send it as
> text/plain. Until people complain and the server admin fixes things.
>
>
> Pete
>
> --
> http://tinkernet.org/
> videoblog for the future...
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Apple video podcasting app?

[T.Whid]

(I'll reply to myself)

I see from this screenshot:

http://tinyurl.com/9h2qd

That there's a "Working with Podcasts" support topic. It makes sense
to roll audio podcast creation into GarageBand I suppose... but video?

On 1/5/06, T.Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that make any sense?
>
> Why would they integrate video podcast (or vlogging or whatever)
> creation?/viewing?/subscribing? into Garageband? I never use it, but
> isn't it an audio creation application? The ability to import vid into
> GB is probably just to extract the audio in one step.
>
> "suggesting support for Video Podcasts" is very vague. What does
> "support" mean? Play them? Make them? Subscribe to them? All of the
> above?
>
> It would make much more sense to build video podcast creation into
> iMovie and marry it to .Mac.
>
> On 1/5/06, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Macworld Expo is next week. Will Apple release software to make video
> > podcasting easier?
> >
> >   http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/01/20060105114200.shtml
> >
> >"Readers note that it appears that according to this page, you can
> > import Video to Garageband, suggesting support for Video Podcasts."
> >
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > --
> > http://tinkernet.org/
> > videoblog for the future...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> www.mteww.com
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Apple video podcasting app?

[T.Whid]

Does that make any sense?

Why would they integrate video podcast (or vlogging or whatever)
creation?/viewing?/subscribing? into Garageband? I never use it, but
isn't it an audio creation application? The ability to import vid into
GB is probably just to extract the audio in one step.

"suggesting support for Video Podcasts" is very vague. What does
"support" mean? Play them? Make them? Subscribe to them? All of the
above?

It would make much more sense to build video podcast creation into
iMovie and marry it to .Mac.

On 1/5/06, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Macworld Expo is next week. Will Apple release software to make video
> podcasting easier?
>
>   http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/01/20060105114200.shtml
>
>"Readers note that it appears that according to this page, you can
> import Video to Garageband, suggesting support for Video Podcasts."
>
>
> Pete
>
> --
> http://tinkernet.org/
> videoblog for the future...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] iPod QT m4v format problems

[T.Whid]

You shouldn't rename it to .MOV.Add the MIME type for M4V to your server instead. This will fix the problem with browsers handling the file in the wrong way (downloading as plain text).I use the mime type video/mp4 for M4V files on my server (suggested by J. Kinberg on this list).
If you don't know how to set the mime type, do a search for "addtype" and  ".htaccess". Some hosted servers don't allow .htaccess files. You can also add mime types to IIS if you are running your own Windows server.
On 1/4/06, John Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hello Vloggers,Thanks for eveyones help yesterday.  I have installed the feed enclosure plugin and it seems to be working great and it improved the reliability of the feed.  I'm not sure I understand the difference between the 
atom.xml and the RSS index.xml output files for Moveable Type so if anyone can explain I would appreciate it.Anyway the feed seems to work better, but when downloads are done using iTunes through a podcast subscription ... the file looks like it is downloading and then when it completes it does not load the file as if it is the wrong format and leaves and exclaimation mark next to it instead.  Likewise when i click on the link in the block to access the same file I am taken to a page with the quicktime logo as it downloads and that logo eventually turns into a Question Mark indicating it does not know what to do with the file.  FireAnt on the other hand has no problem downloading the file and playing it ... I have another problem there however in that FireAnt attempts to play the QT file and our Flashfile in the RSS feed viewer below the video so that provides some confusion.
Now one thing that you should know is I have exported the files using QT pro to the M4V format but renamed the files with the MOV suffix.  I did this because previously when I had uploaded files with the M4V extension and tried to view them through the web with a browser I got back text encoding in the browser rather than the QT File.  I have had more luck with the MOV extension.
To check out our blog and feed go to ...http://www.choosecast.com/charlotte/lifeseens
feed://feeds.feedburner.com/choosecast/charlotte/lifeseensHELP!  Anyone have any insight into why I am having file format or transfer problems with the QT files?
 
John MayesProduction & Technology ManagerWe Can Choose, Inc
831 East Morehead Street, Suite 740Charlotte, North Carolina 28202704-377-2870 ext.13
[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.ChooseCharlotte.com 





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Typepad
  
  



Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  







-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] professional vlog start up

[T.Whid]

Am I missing something with Wordpress? I wanted multiple video format
feeds from one blog and had to hack together my own solution (wasn't
hard if one knows a tad of PHP, but still).

This was using WP 1.5... Does WP 2.0 handle multiple video format feeds better?

If anyone knows, please enlighten me :-)

On 1/2/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rocketboom uses MovableType.
> A lot of people use Wordpress and it gives great results too.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 1/1/06, Misha Kleider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > i would like to start up a fancy looking vlog.  is movable type the format
> > to use or should i make my own set up starting from scratch? what would you
> > recommend. oh, what does rocket boom or other really successful vlogs use?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > kind regards, misha kleider
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Dream Host?? Is it a Dream? I'm thinking of hosting my site there. Rob

[T.Whid]

I use Dreamhost for a few different sites. I used to think they were
the superb, but one of my sites has been having downtime, problems
with PHP, mysql databases going down. It was only a few hours over a
few months... but it got to be annoying when it happened a couple of
months in a row.

It wasn't horrible and when I called customer support and complained
they immediately comped me a free month.

I've found their support to be pretty good. They respond fairly
quickly to emails and will give you call backs too.

All in all i recommend them.

On 1/2/06, Rob Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] The Chronic - What - kals of Narnia!

[T.Whid]

This is extremely funny.

http://www.youtube.com/watch.php?v=zLElfJ9YCh0
--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Fwd: RHIZOME_RAW: Mobile Exposure 2006 Call for Works

[T.Whid]

was this submitted to the list? if dupes, sorries.

-- Forwarded message --
From: T.Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 16, 2005 5:00 PM
Subject: Fwd: RHIZOME_RAW: Mobile Exposure 2006 Call for Works
To: Bill Hallinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre Sala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephanie Martz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 16, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Mobile Exposure 2006 Call for Works
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mobile Exposure

* An international touring exhibition of moving image art made by
and for mobile devices
* Presented by Microcinema International
* Curators: Patrick Lichty and Microcinema International
* Judges: Addictive TV (United Kingdom)
* Excerpts to premiere at San Francisco International Film Festival
* Deadline: Received by March 31, 2006
* Screenings: worldwide
* Grand Prize: Panasonic AG-DVX100A 1/3" 3-CCD 24P/30P/60i DV Cinema Camera
* Fees: US$5
* More information write: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TWO SCREENING PROGRAMS

Mobile Exposure 2006 (moving images made by mobile devices)

Mobile Exposure 2006 Video Ringtone Festival (on-line/on-mobile device)

Mobile phones, PDA's, i-pods, and other hand-held devices have already
gained widespread acceptance as tools to capture as well as experience
music and photographs. Now these devices are being further designed
and equipped with video capabilities - both for viewing as well as
capturing. What are the potentials of the handheld device as a
cinematic tool for expression, activism, experimentation, and
exhibition? With the recent announcement of the i-pod video device and
the Emmy Awards creation of a new mobile film category, the
advancement of this medium is now a foregone conclusion...the train
has left the station that is for sure, but on what track is it
heading?

How will viewing images on the small screen change our perception of
the moving image arts? How will the moving image arts change to
present works on a hand-held device? These are some of the questions
that Mobile Exposure 2006 hopes to address.

CONCEPT Mobile Exposure 2006 is looking for works that address mobile
culture and/or are made WITH or to be EXHIBITED ON mobile/handheld
devices. Our criteria are very broad; reflect on the mobile and
locative through the medium or the concept. We encourage hybrid works
as well (for example: imagery made with hand-helds and then post
produced, mixed with sound in a classic filmmaking procedure).

CALL FOR WORKS The Mobile Exposure 2006 handheld moving image program
is an exploration of the potentials of mobile video and culture.
Practitioners are invited to submit all genres of work, less than 15
minutes in length. Video Ringtones should be 2 minutes or less in
length.

WHAT WE WANT: We are looking for two types of works:

Made for viewing on a mobile device and
Made WITH a mobile device for viewing on the big screen (or little
screen too if possible).

We are looking for works made using cell phones, obsolete video
cameras, wrist cams, toy (NON-vhs/dv/hi-8) video cameras, PDA's, and
even small cameras that create mpg moving images. Please do not send
any material using conventional video cameras unless it specifically
relates to mobile culture. For films destined FOR the small screens of
hand-held devices, any method of filmmaking is acceptable.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES and CHECKLIST see our Submission FAQ
see the Submission Checklist

You must fill out the on-line form found here: Submission Form (for all calls).
FEES: US$5.00 payable by check, money or credit card/Paypal online.
Please send check with submission or PAY ONLINE.

Please send us your screeners on VHS, CD, mini-DV, or DVD, readable on
PC. PAL or NTSC accepted for screeners. DVDs region 1 or 0 only.

For exhibition we will require works on mini-DV (preferred) or
unauthored DVD (mpeg, avi, or mov files only). Mini-DV PAL or NTSC OK.
Unauthored data files must be in NTSC. We may also accept some video
ringtone submissions via upload. DVDs region 1 or 0 only.

Must be 15 minutes or less, including all titles...NO EXCEPTIONS.
Ringtones 2 minutes or less.

For works destined for the big screen please make sure that frame
rates and screen size are "viewable" (720 x 480 format preferred for
NTSC, analogous for PAL).

A brief synopsis of the work(s) of up to 150 words and a short
biography of the artists of up to 50 words maximum is also requested.
Still .jpeg or .gif (PC formatted) should be included on a CD along
with biographical materials and synopses.

Please include a stamped, self-addressed postcard that we will send
back to you as indication of reception of your film.

ALL SUBMITTED ITEMS (papers, DVDs, tapes, cards, etc) MUST HAVE THE
ARTIST NAME, NAME OF THE WORK, CONTACT, AND WHICH SECTION OF THE
FESTIVAL YOU ARE SUBMMITING TO WRITTEN CLEARLY.

Deadline: March 31, 2006 (arrival at the address below)

Please mail all submissi

Re: [videoblogging] Yet another NYT article on vlogging

[T.Whid]

Josh,Your response to a silly journalist laziness (flogging a stereotype) isn't ingratitude, it's common sense.On 12/11/05, Josh Leo <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I am happy that My vlog was mentioned in the "video Podcast" article...I am happy that my picture wound up on there too...However I am not happy that my Vlog (which has around 70 videos) has been brought to the world with this phrase "like a college kid in Michigan playing 
drunken miniature golf," Really? is that all my Vlog is? I would love it If when I got a mention in a international news paper that it said something like:
"Josh Leo's Vlog is really well done and entertaining" "Josh Leo is a very good story teller" "Josh Leo's Vlog is consistent and always fun"Instead, I get lumped with all the "college kids" who make videos of their friends puking, crashing their bikes, shooting fireworks out of their mouths and getting drunk in front of the camera. I would like to think that what II am doing is more than just some college kid getting drunk in front of a camera. I would like to get proper representation.
ok, begin the "Josh you are a self-centered ass who is never satisfied with anything who should be grateful for all you have gotten so far" emails flow...
-- www.mteww.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

[T.Whid]

Link to the NYT?On 12/9/05, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!From this weekend's NYT:"Giving up no creative control, Ms. Congdon and
Mr. Baron will get 50 percent of the revenue from ads sold by TiVo to
appear before and after their newscast, and their show will gain access
to more than 300,000 TV sets connected to those new TiVo boxes."Let the tomato-throwing begin. Of course, I'm really insanely jealous! Congrats again, guys. And they're not the only ones mentioned - dig this:
"The best vlogs, like Scratch Video and Minnesota Stories,above, can
turn personal narrative about the tedious or mundane into
microdocumentaries of wit, beauty and intelligence. A year ago there
were fewer than two dozen active vlogs; now there are some 2,000."-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

[T.Whid]

How are you setting the mime-type?

I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in
browsers and so that wordpress recognized it and created the enclosure
tags). I first set it as video/quicktime and now just changed it to
video/mp4 per Josh's suggestion.

Are you certain that you are allowed to use an .htaccess file on your server?

On 12/9/05, Eric Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that 
> at -35 C and F
> the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are 
> steps to take
> to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc.
>
> I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner 
> doesn't see it
> to make it an enclosure.
>
> I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be 
> using it on a regular
> basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume 
> that more
> people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot---it's not 
> our job to
> dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly 
> won't go the way
> of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose 
> predictions, I
> might be wrong. Still something to consider.
>
> ER
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32
> > degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like
> > ten degrees.
> >
> > As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the
> > MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right?
> >
> > What aabout changing it to MOV?  The extention is much more
> > recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only
> > play in Quicktime anyway.
> >
> > Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go.  100% the
> > future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and
> > common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more
> > recognized extention.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment)
> > and I posted the first of a
> > few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns
> > jibberish text in the
> > browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files).
> >
> > Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME
> > type for video/quicktime for
> > m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/
> > mpeg, and included the
> > standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed.
> >
> > For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware
> > software will see the post
> > but not the media file.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Eric
> > ericrice.com
> > PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather
> > vlogger-style,
> > natch ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] DivX - Shameless Plug

[T.Whid]

Hi,Re: DVD playersThe link on the download page is broken, can you provide one? And, is this a list of compatible DVD players?On 12/8/05, 
Jim Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
















We have playback implementations in all of
these areas. DivX is an mpeg-4 implementation. One mis-understanding is that
because mpeg-4 is a standards based format that they all are about the same
quality. For example, tests show DivX performs better than baseline h.264. That
isn't to say that h.264 can't be better than DivX, but baseline
implementations (i.e. h.264 for ipod) won't be as good as DivX.

 

By standard, what I mean is that other
encoders can make video streams that can be decoded by divx and vice versa.
There are limitations. We are working on a simple app that can check any video
to see if our decoders can play the video. If it can then it means ALL divx
decoders can play the file, including the 50+ million certified DVD players out
there.

 

I'm not sure if that was the
question. Am I close?

 

Jim Vinson









From:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005
11:57 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] DivX
- Shameless Plug



 

So, can you explain a little
more what does this statement means:

> This puts a standard mpeg-4 based playback in
the quicktime player,
> windows media player, consumer electronics
devices. The converter is
> very easy, just drag and drop, or you can
export from quicktime pro
> directly to DivX.

-Josh


On 12/8/05, Jim Vinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> They will have to have something installed
that can decode divx. I don't
> know about the full integration with these
other decoders inside quicktime,
> but xvid, vlc and a fist full of other
programs can decode DivX video.
>
>
>
> Jim V
>
>
>
>  
>
>
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg
>  Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:40
AM
>  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] DivX -
Shameless Plug
>
>
>
> So if I encode with DivX, the video can be
played in QT Player and
>  Windows Media Player?
>  But the viewer has to have DivX codec
installed, right?
>
>  -josh
>
>
>  On 12/8/05, JV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > A little shameless plug
>  >
>  > http://www.divx.com/divx/mac/
>  >
>  > There is a free trial, but if
anyone needs a sn, drop me a line and
>  > I'll get you one.
>  >
>  > This is the first time we have had
our mac development ahead of PC
>  > development (don't worry, the PC
side is almost done ;) )
>  >
>  > This puts a standard mpeg-4 based
playback in the quicktime player,
>  > windows media player, consumer
electronics devices. The converter is
>  > very easy, just drag and drop, or
you can export from quicktime pro
>  > directly to DivX.
>  >
>  > We also have released the open
source encoding application Dr. DivX
>  > at www.drdivx.com. It is only
compiled for PC right now, but we
>  > should have Linux and Mac
installers coming along.
>  >
>  > There are a few more widgets we
are working on, but they are about a
>  > month out.
>  >
>  > If you have any questions, hit me
up
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  >
>  > Jim V
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Yahoo! Groups Links
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group
"videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:
> 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>









  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Typepad
  
  



Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  










-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] bloggerheads.tv

[T.Whid]

I subbed using TVTonic and it worked fine, downloaded speedily and etc..

It's valid according to feed validator:
http://tinyurl.com/7qfdo

--
www.mteww.com

On 12/7/05, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is a feed:
> > http://bloggingheads.tv/rss.php
> > WMV enclosures
>
> does this work for you...for soem reason its not leting me subscribe to it.
>
> jay
>
> --
> Adventures in Videoblogging
> http://www.momentshowing.net>
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] bloggerheads.tv

[T.Whid]

Hi,There is a feed:http://bloggingheads.tv/rss.phpWMV enclosuresOn 12/6/05, Kearney, Pat
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:






How did they do this technically?


From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael 
SullivanSent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 8:45 AMTo: 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [videoblogging] 
bloggerheads.tv
i like it.
On 12/6/05, Jay 
dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
steve 
  garfiled just showed this to me.http://bloggingheads.tv/not a 
  videoblog with a feed.No quicktime.its more like TV...but i love that 
  people are starting to have video conversations 
  online.Jay--Adventures in Videoblogginghttp://www.momentshowing.net
>< 
  http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing> 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->1.2 million kids a year 
  are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~->Yahoo! 
  Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go 
  to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/<*> 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: 
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - -"The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and 
revelation from which new form is born" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory
http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog 
Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off 
again personal vlog 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Typepad
  
  



Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] ffmpegX for mac now supports ipod h264

[T.Whid]

>They render really fast too.

My experience is that, tho I think the H264 looks better at smaller
sizes, it's slow as dirt to encode. At least with QT... haven't tried
any other encoders.

cheers,

On 12/2/05, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive been using it and its AMAZING how small in file size H.264s are
> compared to Mpeg and 3ivx.
>
> They render really fast too.
>
> H264 will take over quickly, I think, because its that much better.
>
> On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Steve Watkins wrote:
>
> > New version of ffmpegx came out the other day that apparently supports
> > ipod h264, Im just giving it a try now. Its probably a bit too nerdy
> > for some, hopefully iSquint will be able to learn the h264 ipod
> > secrets used in this ffmpegX, and also add ipod 264 support.
> >
> > ffmpegx:
> >
> > http://homepage.mac.com/major4/
> >
> > isquint:
> >
> > http://homepage.mac.com/tylerl82/
> >



--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: camcorder to hard drive

[T.Whid]

Bill's suggestion is a good one. Just to add, you can capture with QT
Pro 7 as well -- unsure if it works on Windows.

On 12/2/05, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah there are a few options for this. There are some products that
> are camera mounted direct to disk hard drives. They're kind of
> expensive, at least the ones I've seen at B&H photo. There is a budget
> way of doing this. You can capture direct to a laptop HD via firewire.
> I don't know what options there are to do this on a Mac but you can do
> it via Final Cut Pro or Express or iMovie on a mac very easily. This
> is a great option for stationary or studio work but not so good if you
> need the camera to be mobile.
>
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> www.lofistl.com
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, DrLinton Hutchinson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For those Video Gurus out there - I have a question
> > Is there a camcorder that  you can be shooting and at the same time
> it
> > saves to an external hard drive rather than tape?  A 3 chip version
> > would be a preference, but one that can be recording action and also
> > saving it to a hard drive would be perfect!
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > With friendly greetings,
> >
> >
> > Linton
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] QT 7 Poster Frames / WAS Blogger templates SPECIFIALLY for bloggers

[T.Whid]

I've seen some very buggy behavior on the Windows version -- out of
sync audio/video, jittery, the plugin sometimes kills the browser.

On Mac I've seen some of this, but pretty rarely.

One would think that it would be unbuggy (since it's a core port of
OSX), but they threw together the new iTunes (with podcast, vid store
and video ipod integration) so quickly that maybe they skimped a bit
on the QA?

On 11/30/05, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel like QT 7 is very buggy.
> It often stutters and causes my iBook (Panther, not Tiger) to freeze
> up occasionally.
> Can anyone else confirm this behavior?
>
> This poster image bug is another log to add to the fire on that...
>
> -josh
>
>
> On 11/30/05, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This brings up a QT 7 issue.
> >
> > Regularly set poster frames in QT6 to great effect.
> >
> > But in QT 7 when I open a .mov with a poster frame, it begins playing
> > from the poster frame rather than the beginning of the video.
> >
> > Because I'm doing lots of "presentations" that screwed with the flow -
> > to add the additional step of hitting "rewind" before playing a file.
> >
> > Anyone got suggestions / workarounds?
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > --
> > "It isn't done alone. Pay more."
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - education
> > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion
> > http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound
> > http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media
> > http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature
> > .
> >
> > On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:45 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> >
> > >  I don't know the specifics of MeFeedia's server setup or queueing
> > > mechanism.
> > >  I don't know if its able to fail gracefully and move on when it
> > > encounters errors.
> > >  There are lots of video codecs out there -- not every QT, WMV, AVI,
> > > etc. are made equally.
> > >
> > >  As for setting a poster frame... yes, do that. Its generally good
> > > practice, though most people tend to disregard.
> > >
> > >  In FireAnt on Windows we extract thumbnails that display in your
> > > collection of videos.
> > >  If you've set a poster frame, that is the image that gets extracted.
> > >
> > >  -Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/29/05, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>  but the argument stands
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  Markus Sandy wrote:
> > >>>  but do the math:
> > >>>
> > >>>  there are less than 2000 feeds as of today
> > >>>  i think 500 videos per feed is grossly over estimating most
> > >>> people's *average* output
> > >>>  that's 100,000 thumbs
> > >>>  we have been told that they have been generating them for several
> > >>> weeks (months?) now
> > >>>  let's assume only 6 weeks = 6 x 7 x 24 x 60 = 60480 minutes
> > >>>  that's 16 minutes per thumb and counting
> > >>>
> > >>>  more likely, there is an average of less than 200 videos per feed
> > >>> at this time
> > >>>  so 40 minutes per thumb or higher?
> > >>>  wow, that's a lot!
> > >>>
> > >>>  this still does not explain why older video thumbs are not slowly
> > >>> showing up for me and why some new ones aren't
> > >>>  (no changes in codec here)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>  Joshua Kinberg wrote:Thumbnail generation is a very CPU intensive
> > >>> process.
> >  Mefeedia's server must download your videos, extract thumbs and save
> >  them, then remove the video. Not to mention there are often errors
> >  due
> >  to various video codecs and the fact that it can be hard to decode
> >  all
> > 
> >  types and extract images.
> > 
> >  Even Yahoo! has difficulty in this area, and they have much better
> >  server resources than MeFeedia. Someone in Yahoo! Media Search once
> >  told me that it can take several days for a video to be indexed
> > 
> >  properly even after the crawler has discovered the video. Its for
> >  the
> >  same exact reason. There is a batch queue set up to extract the
> >  thumbnails and do whatever other processing needed on the file
> >  before
> >  it gets indexed properly by the search engine.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  -Josh
> > 
> > 
> >  On 11/29/05, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Our thumbnail generating code got a bit behind, but it will catch
> > > up soon.
> > >
> > > On 11/29/05, Christopher Ivanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Problem with using mefeedia's archive code is that it does not
> > >> consistently
> > >> show thumbnails for all videos.  Why do some vlogs don't have
> > >> pics, and
> > >> others do not.  That's been an ongoing problem for a long, long
> > >> time.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Chris
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 11/29/05, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> set blogger to show one post per page
> > >>>
> > >>> that takes care of question #1
> > >>>
> > >>> you can use mefeedia's archive code to di

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

[T.Whid]

It probably doesn't have anything to do with it being sexually
provocative, it's just provoking a lawsuit...

Mattel has a long history of suing like crazy over Barbie.

just google barbie lawsuit...

Still, it's a drag that it was removed.

On 11/29/05, Aimee Buyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well i guess my work on gender issues is a little too
> provocative.
>
>
> "Dear Patron:
>
> You recently uploaded an item to one of our
> collections. Curators had
> to remove it, possibly due to one of the following
> reasons:
>
> -Rights status unclear
> -Rights status appears inappropriate for our
> collections
> -Inappropriate content (eg, pornography)
> -Uploader requested the removal
> -Item content was empty or broken
>
> Although we appreciate your willingness to contribute,
> we would like
> to host only content that rightsholders will permit us
> to host. Please
> do not attempt to reupload this item. Thanks for your
> understanding!
>
> -an Internet Archive curator"
>
> check it out!
> aimee
> http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-contain-adult.html
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Check out this video on DVblog

[T.Whid]

On 11/28/05, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "T.Whid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > http://dvblog.org/the-worlds-largest-tv-studio
> >
> > +++
> >
> > talking about this same stuff over 30 years ago...
> >
> >
>
> I bet there was some people talking about similar issues of a honest,
> distributed media when the Gutenberg press came into popular use.
>

Absolutely. In the monarchy's that dominated Europe when the printing
press was invented it was many times a crime to own one that wasn't
licensed by the gov't.

Another good read about early use of video by independents:
Radical Software
http://www.radicalsoftware.org


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Check out this video on DVblog

[T.Whid]

http://dvblog.org/the-worlds-largest-tv-studio

+++

talking about this same stuff over 30 years ago...


--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Create 2 feeds for different media formats in Wordpress 1.5 (quick and dirty)

[T.Whid]

Hi folks,

I posted my little hack on my blog. Hope it's helpful to someone. I
would be interested in hearing any other ideas on how to work with
Wordpress feeds.

http://tinyurl.com/9o87l

--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] YouthMinistryTV.com » Happy Thanksgiving 2005

[T.Whid]

CC needs to make it clearer what attribution means. I'm sure it's in the thick legalese, but the whole idea is that non-lawyers can figure out what is and isn't allowed with the CC license.Does anyone know where a lay interpretation of the legalese may be?
On 11/25/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IANAL. The full legal code is at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode > (under"Restrictions").Since they're not linking back (or showing in the video) the URI for your
blog entry and/or your original video, they're not giving properattribution.- AndreasOn Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:00:50 +0100, Steve Garfield<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> YouthMinistryTV.com remixed my video and deleted my credits from the> video, but credit me in the blog post.>> >> Are they complying with the CC license on my blog which ask for> attribution credit?>> --Steve-- 
www.mteww.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: separate RSS for second video format

[T.Whid]

Hi,I hacked wp a bit to make two diff feeds for one post (if you provide links in one post for two diff media files so that wp's default behavior is to create 2 enclosures). It's pretty simple.. you just provide a format via a query string and filter the enclosure routine to only write the enclosure to the feed that matches the format you want.
If anyone is interested let me know and I'll try to provide more details. I can't do it right now as presently I'm a bit tipsy and stuffed from the turkey day din.caio,
On 11/24/05, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Josh,I was thinking about this since i use Wordpress...I know I can have feeds for each category but how can I make aseparate feed without duplicating posts?VerdiOn Nov 24, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> Or maybe its time to ween off Blogger to something that provides more> options and customizability... Wordpress, MovableType, TypePad, and> there are plenty of others...>> -josh
>>> On 11/24/05, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> Yep, that works.  Just take the rss feed from delicious and run it>> through feedburner.  I just tried it - works great.
>> -Verdi On Nov 24, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Tom wrote:>>> Thanks Michael,>>> but still...I would prefer to have one bolg...>>> following your advice - what if I use 
del.icio.us instead of second>>> blog and tag my another video format (let's say 3gp) there, then>>> copy>>> del.icio.us
 RSS tagged 3gp>>> and paste it (as a separate feed) to my main blog. Does it make>>> sense?>>> t>>> URL: http://www.fastmovinganimals.blogspot.com/
>>> FEED: http://feeds.feedburner.com/FastMovingAnimals --- In 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Hey Tom, You can - though it's kind of clumsy.  Since you're using blogspot,
 just set up a second blog (don't publicize it) and copy and past>>> your>> regular posts over there.  Just remember to change the url of the
 video.  Then set up a feedburner feed and put the button on your>>> main>> blog. Verdi,
 -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com R&D: http://graymattergravy.com
 Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
>  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor >>> ~-->
>>> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your>>> home page>>> http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
>>> >>> ~->> Yahoo! Groups Links>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ~-->> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your
> home page> http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM> 
> ~- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~->
Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] for the new people on this group

[T.Whid]

according to those #s, video podcast is doing pretty crappy too :-(

On 11/23/05, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are searches people made NOT results.
>
> Lots of people are looking for ipod video, fewer are searching for
> vlogs.
>
> On Nov 23, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Steve Garfield wrote:
>
> > A search over at http://inventory.overture.com gives these results for
> > October searches:
> >
> > vlog - 3,199
> > videoblog - 366
> > video blog - 6,353
> > video podcast - 1,360
> > ipod video - 86,341
>
> --Steve
> --



--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] for the new people on this group

[T.Whid]

yo to you,

On 11/23/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  yo,
>
> podcast is utterly the worst word that could have ever come out of
> audioblogging and now videoblogging.  i absolutely despise it.  why?
> because any term that references a specific product from a specific company
> that is in no way exclsuive to what it is is wrong and confusing.

a danger that I mentioned in my email

>
> also, you say:
> > To simply add 'video' to podcast becomes a very simple
> > way to extend what people already know.
>
> wrong.. most people  know podcasts as being internet radio... audio!  so, in
> essence, your saying adding video makes sense to prelude an audio term.
> video radio anyone?

I don't agree. they understand it as 'subscribing' to 'something' to
get audio. When you add video it's instantly recognizable as
'subscribing' to 'something' to get not audio, now video.

>
>
>
> dont forget, also T Whid, there is establishment in the videoblogging
> community  we had vloggercon and several projects and events use
> 'vlog' in their names.  Dont tell us that we should change all that just
> because an apple video iPod came out shit, i have had a portable video
> player for over a year no change in terminology and vocabulary required
> upon purchase.

I'm not telling you to change anything I would encourage you to call
it whatever you like.

But I'm interested in explaining this stuff to people who may not know
anything about it and the shortest possible route presently is 'video
podcast.' Apple, Curry and others are pouring lots of time and dollars
in making the podcast term understood by ordinary consumers. And
presently the way they're defining it is broad enough that it doesn't
conflict with the message I want to get out. Why shouldn't I take
advantage of the education they're doing?

It may come back to bite me in the ass, but for now it seems worth it.

>
> sull
>
>
>
> On 11/23/05, T.Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > It's more than simple 'buzz factor.' Most people don't know what or
> > how to connect to media via xml feeds. 'Podcast' is making headway as
> > the generic term to describe this via Apple's (and others') marketing
> > and promotion. To simply add 'video' to podcast becomes a very simple
> > way to extend what people already know.
> >
> > Vlog isn't good as it is meaningless to anyone that doesn't know the
> > 'v' stands for video.
> >
> > Videoblog is better and more precise if you are talking about a
> > website in blog format that also has video and feeds associated with
> > it.
> >
> > Video podcast is more precise when talking specifically about the feed
> > and any web site associated with it is simply that, associated with
> > it, but not crucial to it.
> >
> > The dangerous part is if one uses the term 'podcast' people might
> > become confused and think that it only works with an ipod or is meant
> > to be used in association with an ipod. I've seen a few launches of
> > video feeds recently where the only instructions they give on how to
> > use it is to use iTunes. This is a problem (I'm sure you'll agree).
> >
> > On 11/23/05, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Don't you mean "video podcast"?
> > >
> > > I'm joking, of course, but I've noticed a lot of people in this group
> > > change their weblog title or description to include the phrase "video
> > > podcast" since the release of the video iPod. Is this simply to gain a
> > > little extra Google-juice with the hopes of snagging those searching
> > > for the phrase?
> > >
> > > I'm personally still on the side of "videoblog" or the shortened
> > > "vlog" for a number of reasons... many of them already discussed
> > > here... I'm just curious to know if there's another reason people are
> > > opting for "video podcast" other than the recent buzz factor?
> > >
> > >
> > > Josh
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.mteww.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>  sull
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> "The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of 

Re: [videoblogging] for the new people on this group

[T.Whid]

Hi Josh,

It's more than simple 'buzz factor.' Most people don't know what or
how to connect to media via xml feeds. 'Podcast' is making headway as
the generic term to describe this via Apple's (and others') marketing
and promotion. To simply add 'video' to podcast becomes a very simple
way to extend what people already know.

Vlog isn't good as it is meaningless to anyone that doesn't know the
'v' stands for video.

Videoblog is better and more precise if you are talking about a
website in blog format that also has video and feeds associated with
it.

Video podcast is more precise when talking specifically about the feed
and any web site associated with it is simply that, associated with
it, but not crucial to it.

The dangerous part is if one uses the term 'podcast' people might
become confused and think that it only works with an ipod or is meant
to be used in association with an ipod. I've seen a few launches of
video feeds recently where the only instructions they give on how to
use it is to use iTunes. This is a problem (I'm sure you'll agree).

On 11/23/05, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't you mean "video podcast"?
>
> I'm joking, of course, but I've noticed a lot of people in this group
> change their weblog title or description to include the phrase "video
> podcast" since the release of the video iPod. Is this simply to gain a
> little extra Google-juice with the hopes of snagging those searching
> for the phrase?
>
> I'm personally still on the side of "videoblog" or the shortened
> "vlog" for a number of reasons... many of them already discussed
> here... I'm just curious to know if there's another reason people are
> opting for "video podcast" other than the recent buzz factor?
>
>
> Josh
>


--
www.mteww.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: MacTech Magazine

[t.whid]

I hate 'vodcasting' more than all the rest :-)

um, on topic.. haven't seen it.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.mactech.com/
> 
> November 2005 Issue
> 
> cover story - * Vodcasting: Exploring the Future of Syndicated Media
> 
> Has anyone seen this?
> 
> 
> --Steve






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: vlog art

[t.whid]

In full agreement, really nice vlog using the language of video to address an 
important 
issue. Looks to be using broadcast machine.

Also another new vlog about art popped-up today too:

http://www.culturetv.tv (m4v files, feed link on the front page of course)

And in more art vlog news...
Yours truly is working on a net art project using the techniques and language 
of vlogs that 
I hope to release soon-ish. Stay tuned for the release of the Karaoke 
DeathMatch 100 :-) 

Using Wordpress as the engine. Had to hack it a bit to get it to generate two 
separate 
feeds for different video formats -- perhaps there's an easier way, but the 
beauty of OSS 
allowed me to change the code a bit to work for my own purposes. If anyone is 
interested, 
I can share what I did. It's very specific to my need (and I'm lazy and didn't 
want to make it 
more universal), but could be easily adapted.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, MICA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> an interesting use of videoblog for art and awareness.
> 
> http://www.chrisbarr.net/projects/17minutes/
> 
> --
> Mica Scalin





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: Internet television station

[t.whid]

Or check out broadcast machine: http://participatoryculture.org/broadcast/

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Internet Television?
> 
> Check out http://FreeVlog.org
> Create a videoblog with an RSS feed.
> 
> Then download FireAnt at http://GetFireAnt.com subscribe to your new
> RSS channel and tell others to do the same.
> 
> Now your making Internet Television! which isn't really television at all.
> 
> -josh
> 
> 
> On 11/13/05, dnet4me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me what service is available that I can use to set up
> > a Internet television station.Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: why does an .mp4 ask to open up QuickTime

[t.whid]

what is the browser/OS you're using?

I'm not sure regarding mp4, but I wanted m4v files to be handled by quicktime 
and had to 
add the mime type to my server, otherwise the server would send it with a 
default mime 
type and you would see the binary data rendered in the browser as text. After I 
added the 
mime type as video/quicktime the browser handles it as a quicktime (using 
whatever the 
browser is set up to do with that sort of file). So on my Mac they just render 
in the browser 
using the qt plugin (except for stupid IE).

This might be what you're seeing?

Actually, I just checked your URL and what happens for me in Safari is I see 
the binary data 
rendered in the browser. A small example:

" 

!
"
#
$
%
&

'
(
)

*
+
,
-
.
/
0
1
2

3
4
5
6
7

8
9
:
;
<

=
>[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]
\
`
X
U
O
Y
a
\
[
h
y
W
m
d
R
]
Y
e
\
\
i
k
i
t
°
m
J
k
]
s
_
_
l
c
o
_
z
?
w
l
l
a
k
S
P
o
?
w
`
z
h
r
?
z
|
x
v
j
Æ
?
g
p
q
o
w
s

|

²
m
q
f
x
l
?
i
i
d
d
q
k
h
n
?
ß
Ä
_
t
x
j
?
s
{
h
y
"

So yeah, maybe you want to add the mime type as video/mpeg or something? You 
can do 
it in an .htaccess file if you're using Apache: 
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/
mod_mime.html#addtype


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why does an .mp4 ask to open up QuickTime, instead of playing the video  
> in a new browser window?
> 
> POST
>  class.html>
> 
> VIDEO
> 
> 
> Something to do with a host setting?
> --Steve
> -- 
> Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
> Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
> Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com
> 
> Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.
>





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube - WTF?

[t.whid]

Part of the reason they do well is that their interface and features are very 
good IMHO. I'm 
not that familiar, but based on a quick perusal, they are doing lots of stuff 
right (social 
connections, RSS feed (with enclosures), tags, aggregating, ease-of-use, 
xml-rpc 
interface). They are doing lots of stuff wrong too of course (evil EULA, nasty 
logo bug, 
wonky flash format). I've not tried to upload a video so I can't comment on how 
the quality 
of that part of the service.

I'm sure the VCs simply looked at the numbers, if the numbers are there they 
figure the 
money will follow.

I agree with Verdi in that anyone with a smidgeon of sense wouldn't accept 
their EULA. 
Obviousely no one with any professional inclinations at all will use the 
service for this 
reason, but if it's easy-to-use and free they'll get lots of folks sharing 
video.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2005, at 8:13 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> 
> > oh, and of course, let's not forget that the Audience is larger  
> > than the pool of Content Creators.
> > VC's know this.  These are the people that they are interested in,  
> > afterall
> 
> I get that.  But why do users like the service?  Is it just because  
> it's been inexplicably written up in places like Slashdot and  
> BoingBoing?  It's just hype.  This is what bugs the shit out of me.
> Verdi
>





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: Archiving high-quality orginals?

[t.whid]

I've been wondering about this as well, but I very much want to archive the 
uncompressed 
DV.

Currently I've been buying hard disks every time I need more storage space, 
obviously this 
isn't the best long-term solution... or is it? it's getting cheaper and 
cheaper...

What solutions are other people using? tape drives? waiting for larger capacity 
DVDs? 
terabytes of hard disks? 

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You could save a DVD quality NTSC Mpeg2. There's enough info in those to
> display well on pretty much anything. Plus if you ever feel like making a
> compilation DVD, the transcoding work is done already.
> 
> 
> On 11/7/05, LeanBackVids.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  I'm trying to get in the habit of exporting a high-quality version of
> > all our videos? Using FCP, what file type would be "best"? I can't
> > afford to keep all the uncompress video on my hard drives, so I'd like
> > to only save the final edited movies (uncompressed).
> >
> > Just trying to think ahead to when we all make it to the "big screen".
> >
> > -Matt







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: What do you guys think about Blogtelevision.net

[t.whid]

did you try the 'remove your site' link?

I'm getting some (what looks to be) unparsed PHP when I clicked on it...

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I notice that blogtelevision.net is taking all of the videos that I  
> put up and placing them on their site. They don't give me credit or  
> anything for my work. Do any of you have any feelings towards this  
> site or that issue regarding the usage of your work. They also place  
> a link to the video so that other people can put it on their site but  
> they take the credit for it. Kind of irks me to tell the truth.
> 
> Lynn
> 
> Lynn Lane
> Coal River Pictures/SKILLZ DVD Magazine
> website: www.CoalRiverPictures.com
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> vlog: http://docmaker.blogspot.com
> feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/docmaker
> 
> Coming Soon:
> www.Vlogumentarian.com
> www.VlogReporter.com
> 
> AIVF/IDA
> 
> Ring 8 Member
> NYC
>







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: New QuickTime 7.0.2 Released

[t.whid]

Yo,

After i upgraded and restarted (grumble, grumble) QT auto-launched and I saw 
this link in 
their little spam splash that said something like "create podcasts with QT 7 
pro."

Intrigued, I followed the link.

Here 'tis:
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/podcasting.html

Was this up before? Strange that they also don't have a 'video podcasting' tute 
to go with.

cheers,

twhid www.mtewww.com

btw, I like the new iTunes interface.. but their GUI design changes so rapidly 
now.. kinda 
weird and ADD-ish.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: What's the True Potential of the Videoblogging Community???

[t.whid]

re: crooks and liars. 

I mirrored the video they posted of the Tim Russert interview with a local 
politician in the 
NOLA area.

blogged:
http://dvblog.org/criminal-negligence

direct link to the video:
http://www.mtaa.net/video/Meet-the-Press-Broussard.mov

This man's desperate frustration when dealing with the feds here in the US 
brought me to 
tears of shame and rage.

What we're dealing with is criminal negligence and dereliction of duty. 1000s 
are dying 
because of the Bush Admin's incompetence. Not that the local officials don't 
deserve some 
blame (there's plenty to go around) but anyone who tries to tell you that the 
bulk of 
responsibility doesn't go to FEMA and the feds is simply a craven sociopathic 
partisan.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second what Quirk says here.
> 
> This whole disaster has demonstrated once again how worthless the 
> mainstream media is.
> Things were so bad on the ground in NO that even FOX news reporters 
> were calling bullshit on the scumfucks like bill oreilly and sean 
> hannity back in the studio trying to put the bullshit Bushco spin
on 
> things.
> 
> We also saw brief clips of CNN reporters and others pointing out
the 
> utter fraud that is America. Notice this only came about
> when they were out in the midst of hell watching "dead bodies
getting 
> eaten by rats," as that professional empty suit Anderson Cooper put
it.
> Only when it gets to the very verge of all-out apocalypse can the 
> mainstream media begin to call it like it is.
> 

> 
> To see some of the stuff I'm talking about, please visit:
> www.crooksandliars.com
> 
> They don't seem to have an RSS feed, but so what.
> 
> Also, please listen to madgeweinstein, who's work over the last few 
> months in AUDIO puts to shame all of us goofing around in
VLOG-o-Land: 
> www.yeastradio.com
> 
> 
> Chris Weagel
> www.human-dog.com




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: Narrowing Our View Of Video Blogging?

[t.whid]

I'm a bit of a noob here and not even a videoblogger, but what the
hell, here's my 2¢

below:

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so it was argued earlier, and I recently weighed in on the 
> argument by joking about the poll. Maybe I shouldn't have done
that. 
> So let me be a little more specific about my view, especially since
I 
> don't come back to this group very often.
> 
> I have two concerns. First is by all means talk about what Citizen 
> Media means with respect to New Orleans, by all means discuss how 
> vloggers are reporting the news, yes certainly post about
techniques 
> being used and problems being solved.
> 
> But the actual material itself, and where to get it, is not for
this 
> group, that's what a videoblog is for. THIS IS A META GROUP FOR 
> VIDEOBLOGGING, NOT A VIDEOBLOG. This group is here to help you
report 
> the news on your vlog, not to report it for you.

Wasn't this discussion started because of someone posting links to
streaming media re: 
the disaster in NO and environs? I'll assume it was. Couldn't one
construe the sharing of 
this link as information to help a citizen journalist blog? If
someone asked how to 
transcode streaming video to a format for downloading that would be
OK? But supplying 
links to relevant material isn't? Seems an arbitrary distinction to
me.

If I'm wrong regarding the streaming link feel free to ignore with
extreme prejudice. If it 
was someone posting links to charities or news stories -- then yeah,
stop that :-)



> 
> >  Videoblogging is taking off. We discuss practical issues 
> >(bandwidth, process, need for a videoblogging tool) and more 
> >philosophical issues (why and what is a videoblog? ...). Join the 
> >conversation! A very good group has gathered here to make 
> >videoblogging a reality. Creators and developers are equally
welcome 
> >and needed.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] Re: vlognoscenti

[t.whid]

ugggh, what does it mean? would it be something like vlognorati?

both vlognoscenti and vlognorati are really bad words 

IMHO

:-)

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "jonny goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I think I just made this word up. And if you are on this list, you are one.









  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

[t.whid]

interesting...

wonder if it fails quietly if the device is offline... also would want to ensure that the user 
knows what the dealio is too...

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a  
> hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time  
> someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT  
> file ping a server.
> 
> On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:48 PM, t.whid wrote:
> 










  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

[t.whid]

My 2¢ regarding videoblog :

If you really want to make money you might want to try streaming instead of download. 

There is a market for video advertisements*, but you need to provide numbers or the 
advertisers won't pay. At least that's how it works presently.

Advertisers want to know each time their ad is watched, presently with downloadable 
content like podcasts or videocasts, they can only count the initial hit to the server when 
it's downloaded. If it's watched repeatedly thereafter (forwarded, shared, put on another 
server, etc) then you won't get the maximum amount of dough that you could from the 
content. 

Perhaps at some point someone will do a study (or 10) of downloaded media and the 
advertisers will be talked into using a statistical approach or something (so one would 
count hits and then add a realistic statistical amount to due to forwarding and etc), but 
this isn't really my field and probably talking out of my ass completely at this point :-)

Does anyone know if windows DRM server counts each time a media file is played? Or does 
one just get the key once and that's it? I doubt it counts coz then how would one be able 
to play it on a portable player that isn't connected to the 'net?

(*a recent nyt article described the market somewhat, it's now behind a paywall, it was 
from the august 1, 2005 late edition in the business section )

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Personally, I think that quote above tells me your looking at this  
> >>  whole thing as a means to make a buck.  In my opinion this dooms you  
> >>  to a life of producing complete and utter bullshit. 
> >  
> >  Is it true?
> >  
> >>  My guess is that there are people who start with the desire to make bags of
> >> cash, and then cast around for whatever content they think will earn them
> >> the most. And then there are people who are artistically passionate and
> >> create because they can't help themselves, and would do so if they had no
> >> audience, but end up making filthy lucre because millions love their work.
> >  
> >  Can you tell which content is which when you consume it?
> 
> i wish some of the people in this conversation would answer Charles'
> great comment.
> the fact is that some new guy spammed the group with an email (it was
> sent to other groups as well).
> he says "im thinking about making a videoblog...how can i get money"?






  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

[t.whid]

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "R. Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/9/05, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why would you live with giving away those rights to YouTube when
> > you can just upload via Ourmeida or Blip and just have them respect
> > the CC license?
> 

I agree with Michael Verdi, FWIW.

You don't know how much value this stuff may gain in the future, it could be considerable. 
IMHO, it would be extremely unwise to give away every right you have to your videos at 
this point in the game.

And, by they way, if you agree to those terms you *ARE* giving up every right you have to 
the video as long as those rights are granted by YouTube (CC be damned):

"including the unfettered right to sublicense such rights, in perpetuity throughout
the universe."

YouTube is banking on you thinking like an amateur, no one with any professional urges 
whatsoever or even the faintest glimmer of hope of a professional career either as a video 
personality, producer or editor should agree to these terms. 

I'm not a lawyer, my 2¢.






  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: Disclosures, disclosures

[t.whid]

Hi all,

The company I work for is developing a TV over IP application called TVTonic (http://
www.tvtonic.com). Presently it's windows-based and focused on the 10ft experience. I'm in 
charge of the visual design and do a lot of _javascript_, CSS, and HTML.

I'm also an artist and have been active in the net art/web art/new media art field since 
1997. You can see all the art stuff here: http://mteww.com; blog here: http://
www.mteww.com/mtaaRR

My art collaborator and I just finished a new piece called "Karaoke Deathmatch 100" which 
was conceived as a video installation but we plan on making a web-based version that 
takes the form of a videoblog, should launch sometime in Oct and will run for 10 weeks...

Other art works that may be of interest to videobloggers: 1 Year Performance Video (http:/
/turbulence.org/Works/1year/) and Five Small Videos About Interruption and Disappearing 
(http://www.mteww.com/five_small_videos/).


> 
> On 8/8/05, R. Kristiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about we all disclose our affiliations? Too radical, eh?








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: just learning html codes

[t.whid]

the code you're seeing is outside of any HTML tag. That's always the problem when you 
see code you don't want to see, it's not surrounded by <>.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ok group can you tell that I'm just learning html  codes. well I messed up 
> big time. I like the effect of the mouse roll over but  if you take a look you 
> see the code show through the main page. How do get rid  of that and be able to 
> keep the effect. _http://millielaindia.blogspot.com_ 
> (http://millielaindia.blogspot.com) 
>  
>  
> http:_millielaindia.blogspot.com_ (http://millielaindia.blogspot.com/) 
> 
> Member since 
> Monday, July 25, 2005
> http:_My first  vblog_ (http://millielaindia.blogspot.com/) 
> _my  location on the world map_ 
> (http://www.vlogmap.org/?lon=-82.3662&lat=27.9278&zoom=3)





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: CPU cannot handle h264

[t.whid]

Y, I was a little fast on the trigger there... the digg commentary consensus was that the 
author was FOS as well.


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow that is one misinformed article, so wrong.
> 
> If they actually said what resolution of h264 footage is too much for
> the CPU to handle, they would be closer to accurate. Certain
> exceedinly high HD resolution clips will struggle on certain machines,
> but not the latest fastest CPUs when used with the right h264 playback
> software.
> 
> For, right now, Quicktime 7 PC Preview does not do a great h264
> playback job, but its a bug somewhere, rather than a real lack of CPU
> power. My not-a-dual-core AMD64 PC can encode h264 faster than my iMac
> G5, so Id expect it should theoretically be able to decode it faster
> too. Using an alternative to QT7, Nero Showtime, seems to confirm
> this, as higher res HD 264 playback much smoother using that software
> than QT7, same PC.
> 
> I think I'll have to write to the author of that article, otherwise
> its supporting marchitecture of graphics card assisted decoding which
> isnt actually necessary for many faster PCs. Theres nothing wrong with
> shifting some decoding to the GPU, except historically the marketing
> of such graphics card features has been more prominent than the
> features themselves, they always make it sound more important, and
> more of a performance gain, than it has ever ended up being in real
> world conditions with real software.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Steve of Elbows 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, t.whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Found this via digg.com
> > 
> > http://theinquirer.net/?article=24954
> > 
> > "We were shocked when we found out that the Athlon 64, FX, dual core 
> > X2, Pentium 4 or even dual core Pentium D won't be able to play this 
> > content for you. It's simply too complicated for the poor CPU to play 
> > back."
> > 
> > ===
> > http://www.mteww.com
> > ===





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: Playlist: How to create a vodcast

[t.whid]

it seems the tute was geared specifically toward iTunes 4.9:

"By preparing your movies properly and creating the right feed, you can offer your 
audience video on demand through an application familiar to us all: iTunes 4.9, a version 
of iTunes that supports playback of local and streamed video."

So recommending h264 is OK, not idiotic.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "R. Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> argh, the idiots. 
> 
> H.264 is SO the future/something. oh well, if they only want other
> mac-using QT 7 people to view their vlogs, then fine! :P
> 
> Otherwise, a nice how-to. 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Raymond M. Kristiansen
> - missing out on SO many vlog entries these days =( but soon back home aahh.
> 
> 
> On 7/27/05, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Playlist: How to create a vodcast
> > http://playlistmag.com/features/2005/07/howtovodcast/index.php








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: ny times article on vlogging

[t.whid]

related, there is also an article about current.tv in todays NYTimes:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/25/business/media/25gore.html

I'm curious to check it out. Luckily it's playing in my area, doesn't seem to be very 
widespread thus far.

Has anyone submitted content?

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > links are in the sidebar folks.
> > 
> > -josh
> 
> I can't prove it in a court of law, but I'm *pretty* sure those links were
> added after the article went live. glad to see them, in any case.








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: iTunes storage of XML?

[t.whid]

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yeah, I see your point. Perhaps I'm just used to using NNW which allows one to examine 
the XML. Then, if there is an issue, the clever monkey could perhaps examine it and see 
what the issue is.

Sure, you can always hit the url with another app (browser), but it's nice to have that 
feature built-in. Sometimes I like to see exactly what my app is parsing into it's DB, plist, 
etc. 

I'll need to poke around some more, I'm curious as to how iTunes marks-up the as-yet-
downloaded files in the library.

Take care,


> Why keep the orig XML around if you can parse, drop values into pList
> or Database, and be done with it?
> 
> -josh
> 
> 
> On 7/22/05, t.whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps. H. If I was writing an RSS reader I would think that I would keep the
> > original xml around somewhere until a refresh happened... Apple thinking differently?
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Nolan.ca" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > it does seem to have it parsed out and included in the usual 'iTunes
> > > Music Library.xml' file.  Maybe it doesn't cache it at all and just
> > > converts it directly to it's native format?
> > >
> > > Chris Nolan.ca
> > > http://ChrisNolan.ca/






  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: iTunes storage of XML?

[t.whid]

Perhaps. H. If I was writing an RSS reader I would think that I would keep the 
original xml around somewhere until a refresh happened... Apple thinking differently?

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Nolan.ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> it does seem to have it parsed out and included in the usual 'iTunes
> Music Library.xml' file.  Maybe it doesn't cache it at all and just
> converts it directly to it's native format?
> 
> Chris Nolan.ca
> http://ChrisNolan.ca/






  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] Re: DVLabs

[t.whid]

congrats :-)

I know how it feels. When we launched our bandwidth-hog art work
called 1 Year 
Performance Video, the org that commissioned it was about to pull the
plug, but then a nice 
university (UMaine) stepped in and hosted the video for free. It's a
nice feeling :-)

btw, I've been enjoying RB via iTunes for the last few weeks (days?).
For all it's problems, I 
still feel iTunes is the best audio and video aggregator out there.

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> fortune, today Rocketboom was granted a FREE server account  
> from. . .Drum Roll please!
> 
> http://www.DVLABS.com






  
  





  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.