[Videolib] Impact of GSU

2012-07-12 Thread Deg Farrelly
I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV but I don't think the GSU case 
will have any immediate specific application to copyright as it applies to 
media.

The case was brought by print publishers to the digitizing of printed material, 
that is traditionally divided into chapters.  That is where the 10% portion 
comes into the judge's decision, but is also related to the number of chapters 
in the book.

Certainly the GSU ruling could be referred to by subsequent lawsuits (including 
the UCLA case). But since portions of media works are already covered under 
fair use and the TEACH act, and the bigger issue with media copying (for 
streaming mostly) concerns duplication of a work in its entirety I don't think 
GSU will have much impact on media rulings.

Also worth noting, however, that the GSU ruling references the availability of 
readily/easily available/licensed digital versions, that may be a signal to 
distributors/copyright holders about licensing models for media.

-deg

deg farrelly
ASU Libraries
Arizona State University
P.O. Box 871006
Tempe, Arizona  85287-1006
480.965.1403



On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Jo Ann Reynolds 
jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edu wrote:

  Just wondering . . . .

 ** **

 I noticed that some universities have made changes to their copyright
 checklists based on the court decision. We decided to wait to see what, if
 anything, happened on appeal. I?ve not heard or seen anything, how ?bout
 you all?

 ** **

 Thanks,

 Jo Ann

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] DVD care tips for patrons

2012-07-12 Thread John Streepy
Wipe from the center out, never in a circle, always clean with lint free
cloth. 



John H. Streepy

Library-Government Publications
James E. Brooks Library
Central Washington University
400 East University Way
Ellensburg, WA  98926-7548

(509) 963-2861
http://www.lib.cwu.edu/Documents

Hand to hand combat just goes with the territory.
All part of being a librarian -- James Turner Rex Libris

Transitus profusum est nocens!





 Peterson, Erika Day - petersed peter...@jmu.edu 7/12/2012 10:51
AM 

A group in our library is putting together a bookmark, mainly to
experiment with QR codes, but they'll be including care tips for books
and want to also include care tips for media.  Do any of you have
anything like this that you give to patrons already?  Or can you suggest
some things that you would include?  I'm thinking along the lines of:
If your DVD won't play try*., or make sure the DVD is seated firmly
on the hub in the case to avoid scratches.  Any tips? 



Erika 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

Erika Peterson 

Director of Media Resources 

Carrier Library,   

James Madison University 

(540) 568-6770 

http://www.lib.jmu.edu/media 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] FW: anything new with Georgia State?

2012-07-12 Thread Brewer, Michael
The 10% number was just what the judge came up with to indicate that the amount 
favored or didn't favor fair use, not that the amount had to be less than 10% 
in order to be fair.  I believe (but please correct me if I am wrong) that a 
good  number of portions of  works that exceeded 10% were upheld as fair by the 
judge.

Michael Brewer
Team Leader for Instructional Services
University of Arizona Libraries
brew...@u.library.arizona.edumailto:brew...@u.library.arizona.edu

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jo Ann Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:56 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] FW: anything new with Georgia State?

For print to digital changing the amount to 10%.


From: 
videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu]mailto:[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu]
 On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:52 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] FW: anything new with Georgia State?

I am curious what kind of changes have they made in copyright check lists? 
Obviously I am interested mostly in how if at all this has changed in terms of 
media use.

I don't think an appeal has been filed but it likely will be but it will take 
YEARS to wind itself through the courts.
Remember GATT first became law in 1996. For reasons I never really understood 
it was only challenged years after it had already been in effect. it took 
several more years for the case to wind itself though the courts until Jan of 
this year when the Supreme Court upheld it.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Jo Ann Reynolds 
jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edumailto:jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edu wrote:
Just wondering . . . .

I noticed that some universities have made changes to their copyright 
checklists based on the court decision. We decided to wait to see what, if 
anything, happened on appeal. I've not heard or seen anything, how 'bout you 
all?

Thanks,
Jo Ann

Jo Ann Reynolds
Reserve Services Coordinator
University of Connecticut Libraries
369 Fairfield Road, Unit 1005RR
Storrs, CT  06269-1005
jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edumailto:jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edu
860-486-1406tel:860-486-1406
860-486-5636tel:860-486-5636 (fax)
http://classguides.lib.uconn.edu/mediaresources


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] FW: anything new with Georgia State?

2012-07-12 Thread Jessica Rosner
No Michael none of the portions upheld was greater than 10% that was the
cut off established by the judge. Basically she said that if the use
exceeded more than 10% if would favor the rights holder (as you said) so
not a total ban but a pretty bright line and clearly just a smidge under
100%. To be honest I can't get overly excited because the fact that you can
not use an entire work of any length has been long established in copyright
law but I thought this case would make that pretty obvious.

FYI my copyright lawyer friend says to keep an eye out for the
HathiTrust/Univ of Michigan ruling due out in the next month re digitizing
copyrighted works.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Brewer, Michael 
brew...@u.library.arizona.edu wrote:

  The 10% number was just what the judge came up with to indicate that the
 amount favored or didn’t favor fair use, not that the amount had to be less
 than 10% in order to be fair.  I believe (but please correct me if I am
 wrong) that a good  number of portions of  works that exceeded 10% were
 upheld as fair by the judge.

 ** **

 Michael Brewer

 Team Leader for Instructional Services

 University of Arizona Libraries

 brew...@u.library.arizona.edu

 ** **

 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jo Ann Reynolds
 *Sent:* Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:56 PM

 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] FW: anything new with Georgia State?

  ** **

 For print to digital changing the amount to 10%.

 ** **

 ** **

 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
 [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
 *Sent:* Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:52 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] FW: anything new with Georgia State?

 ** **

 I am curious what kind of changes have they made in copyright check lists?
 Obviously I am interested mostly in how if at all this has changed in terms
 of media use.

 I don't think an appeal has been filed but it likely will be but it will
 take YEARS to wind itself through the courts.
 Remember GATT first became law in 1996. For reasons I never really
 understood it was only challenged years after it had already been in
 effect. it took several more years for the case to wind itself though the
 courts until Jan of this year when the Supreme Court upheld it.

 On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Jo Ann Reynolds 
 jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edu wrote:

 Just wondering . . . .

  

 I noticed that some universities have made changes to their copyright
 checklists based on the court decision. We decided to wait to see what, if
 anything, happened on appeal. I’ve not heard or seen anything, how ‘bout
 you all?

  

 Thanks,

 Jo Ann

  

 Jo Ann Reynolds

 Reserve Services Coordinator

 University of Connecticut Libraries

 369 Fairfield Road, Unit 1005RR

 Storrs, CT  06269-1005

 jo_ann.reyno...@lib.uconn.edu

 860-486-1406

 860-486-5636 (fax)

 *http://classguides.lib.uconn.edu/mediaresources *

  


 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.

 ** **

 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] Limits on amount of use

2012-07-12 Thread Deg Farrelly
Once again, Jessica, you overstate your case.

There is nothing established whatsoever in the law that an entire work cannot 
be used.

Amount used is ONE of the fair use factors, and the courts HAVE ruled that 100% 
use is fair use in some cases.  This is specifically true with cases involving 
art images.

-deg

deg farrelly
ASU Libraries
Arizona State University
P.O. Box 871006
Tempe, Arizona  85287-1006
480.965.1403


snip

To be honest I can't get overly excited because the fact that you can
not use an entire work of any length has been long established in copyright
law but I thought this case would make that pretty obvious.

snip
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Limits on amount of use

2012-07-12 Thread Jessica Rosner
Deg,
As you know I have always commented on the use of an entire feature film
though I would actually make that any piece of media beyond a few minutes.
You want to compare a single art image to  two hour film for fair use
?There have been numerous copyright rulings over many, many years which
have backed this up going all the way back 30 years to a New York State
school district which got bitch slapped for recording and using numerous
educational TV programs in its schools indefinitely claiming fair use.
I am honestly not sure why the judge picked 10% as a bright line in the GSU
case but again it is simply absurd given the entire history of fair use
in copyright law to claim it would cover an entire work of any length
anymore than there is somehow a separate definition of fair use for print
Vs visual works.

I do find it mind boggling that you honestly believe it is legal and
somehow fair use to digitize and stream an entire
work without clearance from the author/filmmaker/rights holder. I wonder
how you would feel in the Univ decided to just eliminate the library and
the librarians because after all one could just put everything the students
ask for on line under  fair use and would save tons of money that they
might otherwise have to spend actually buying those pesky books and films
and the people to curate or manage them.

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Deg Farrelly deg.farre...@asu.edu wrote:

 Once again, Jessica, you overstate your case.

 There is nothing established whatsoever in the law that an entire work
 cannot be used.

 Amount used is ONE of the fair use factors, and the courts HAVE ruled that
 100% use is fair use in some cases.  This is specifically true with cases
 involving art images.

 -deg

 deg farrelly
 ASU Libraries
 Arizona State University
 P.O. Box 871006
 Tempe, Arizona  85287-1006
 480.965.1403
 

 snip

 To be honest I can't get overly excited because the fact that you can
 not use an entire work of any length has been long established in copyright
 law but I thought this case would make that pretty obvious.

 snip
 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.