[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Martyn Hodgson

   Thank you - very clear.

   Of course, it'll make plucking just the high octave a bit trickier if
   playing close(ish) to the bridge but, conversely, will make playing
   just the bass of the pair a bit easier...

 Martyn
   --- On Tue, 29/11/11, Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl wrote:

 From: Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl
 Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges
 To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu, Martyn Hodgson
 hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
 Date: Tuesday, 29 November, 2011, 9:41

   Eh, I'll try.
   If you make a normal loop and keep some 10 cms extra string length
   'behind the bridge' you can pull it again through the slot (in the
   direction of the neck). Then make a loop _over_ the string and pull
   back through the slot again. Fix it on the bridge in the 'normal' way,
   coming from the back of the bridge. This can of course only be done
   with slots. May even be a reason why they are there.
   - Original Message - From: Martyn Hodgson
   [1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   To: [2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu; Lex Eisenhardt
   [3]eisenha...@planet.nl
   Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:00 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges
   
  Thank you Lex:  It seems an interesting idea, but I'm not sure I
   follow
  how you actually do this ie tie the second loop/knot. Could you
   please
  explain further?
   
  rgds
   
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisenha...@planet.nl
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Monica Hall
But why would you want the treble string to be considerably lower than the 
bourdon?   What would be the advantages?   On my guitar the treble string is 
in any case slightly lower - because it is thinner.   It is also lower at 
the nut.   (Perhaps that is what is causing the buzz!). This is an even 
bigger problem with the bourdon on the fifth course.   If you make a deeper 
groove for the bourdon in the nut that can also result in it being too close 
to the fingerboard.


One possible advantage to having slots is that you can adjust the distance 
between the strings of a course a little without having to bore holes...


Monica


- Original Message - 
From: Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl

To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu; Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:41 AM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges



Eh, I'll try.
If you make a normal loop and keep some 10 cms extra string length 'behind 
the bridge' you can pull it again through the slot (in the direction of 
the neck). Then make a loop _over_ the string and pull back through the 
slot again. Fix it on the bridge in the 'normal' way, coming from the back 
of the bridge. This can of course only be done with slots. May even be a 
reason why they are there.



- Original Message - 
From: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk

To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu; Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:00 AM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges




  Thank you Lex:  It seems an interesting idea, but I'm not sure I follow
  how you actually do this ie tie the second loop/knot. Could you please
  explain further?

  rgds






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 





[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Monica Hall


- Original Message - 
From: Eugene C. Braig IV brai...@osu.edu

To: 'Monica Hall' mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges



-Original Message-
From: Monica Hall [mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:35 PM
To: Eugene C. Braig IV
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges


Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges


 Sounds like a plan.  ...If I can convince you to coauthor!

 Eugene

If I am still around by then.

Monica


[Eugene C. Braig IV] Ha!  You've provided incentive for me to strive for 
an

early retirement.

Eugene


Carpe diem!

Monica



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Lex Eisenhardt

  Of course, it'll make plucking just the high octave a bit trickier if
  playing close(ish) to the bridge but, conversely, will make playing
  just the bass of the pair a bit easier...



Even a whole lot,
Lex



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Lex Eisenhardt

  Of course, it'll make plucking just the high octave a bit trickier if
  playing close(ish) to the bridge but, conversely, will make playing
  just the bass of the pair a bit easier...


or actually not 'just' the bass, but it will be really easier to give more 
emphasis on the lower string of the pair, to make it sound like a bass.
Lex 





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Martyn Hodgson

 From: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges
 To: Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl
 Date: Tuesday, 29 November, 2011, 14:10


   Hmmm  .. we agree that it makes plucking just the lower of the octave
   pair easier if one wishes to do this (eg possibly in scalic passages
   from the third to the 4th course), But it makes things like campanella
   play trickier - where one wishes much of the sound to be in the same
   register as the upper course notes of the passage.  So I'm really not
   so sure about the general desirability of what you suggest below - this
   seems to me to be advocating the dubious position of always requiring a
   low 'bass' line rather than simply accepting the unique idiomatic sound
   of the period instrument.

   regards

   Martyn


   --- On Tue, 29/11/11, Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl wrote:

 From: Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl
 Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges
 To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu, Martyn Hodgson
 hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
 Date: Tuesday, 29 November, 2011, 13:40

  Of course, it'll make plucking just the high octave a bit trickier
   if
  playing close(ish) to the bridge but, conversely, will make playing
  just the bass of the pair a bit easier...
   or actually not 'just' the bass, but it will be really easier to give
   more emphasis on the lower string of the pair, to make it sound like a
   bass.
   Lex

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Monica Hall

I am inclined to agree with you.   Given that the bourdon in any case will
be slightly higher the the treble string as it is thicker it is not
difficult to give it prominence where necessary.  A plain gut bourdon on the
fifth is so thick that it is hard to miss!

One reason why I have been pondering on these matters is because the Royal
College of Music has published a catalogue of the stringed instruments in
their collection.   They have some interesting guitars and there are nice 
photos with quite a lot of information about them - although not as much as 
one would like.


Monica


  Hmmm  .. we agree that it makes plucking just the lower of the octave
  pair easier if one wishes to do this (eg possibly in scalic passages
  from the third to the 4th course), But it makes things like campanella
  play trickier - where one wishes much of the sound to be in the same
  register as the upper course notes of the passage.  So I'm really not
  so sure about the general desirability of what you suggest below - this
  seems to me to be advocating the dubious position of always requiring a
  low 'bass' line rather than simply accepting the unique idiomatic sound
  of the period instrument.

  regards

  Martyn


  --- On Tue, 29/11/11, Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl wrote:

From: Lex Eisenhardt eisenha...@planet.nl
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges
To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu, Martyn Hodgson
hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Tuesday, 29 November, 2011, 13:40

 Of course, it'll make plucking just the high octave a bit trickier
  if
 playing close(ish) to the bridge but, conversely, will make playing
 just the bass of the pair a bit easier...
  or actually not 'just' the bass, but it will be really easier to give
  more emphasis on the lower string of the pair, to make it sound like a
  bass.
  Lex

  --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar bridges

2011-11-29 Thread Lex Eisenhardt


  Hmmm  .. we agree that it makes plucking just the lower of the
   octave
  pair easier if one wishes to do this (eg possibly in scalic passages
  from the third to the 4th course),

   ...and of course in polyphony (or, as some say in Britain,
   counterpoint).


But it makes things like campanella
  play trickier - where one wishes much of the sound to be in the same
  register as the upper course notes of the passage.

   Isn't that very much a matter of technique? It still remains perfectly
   possible to bring out the high ocaves convincingly. And there arealso
   lots of campanelas in music for 'French' tuning, which stillhas one
   bourdon. Since there seems to be no historic information at all about
   leaving out the bourdons in 'cascading scalar passages' I think we
   should be careful with supposing that that was the norm. We just don't
   know


   So I'm really not
  so sure about the general desirability of what you suggest below -
   this
  seems to me to be advocating the dubious position of always
   requiring a
  low 'bass' line rather than simply accepting the unique idiomatic
   sound
  of the period instrument.

   Who advocates that there should always be sounding a low bass? That is
   certainly not what I intend to say. Also with an octave string adjusted
   lower at the bridge it is well possible to mainly bring out the treble
   strings. It's not a matter of black or white.

   And what if someone like the champion of campanelas (Bartolotti) would
   have preferred to use bourdons? I know some on this list do not believe
   that, but I feel there are enough reasons to take this as an serious
   option.

   It seems to me that the 'unique idiomatic sound of the period
   instrument' could well be a modern paradigm. Would a guitar with
   bourdons not be capable to produce that unique sound?

   Lex

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html