Re: [Viking-devel] Ubuntu PPA For Viking 1.4
Nice news. Two comments: - How difficult it is to add Precise as target for the build? Precise is the current LTS, so I think it could be usefull to provide recent viking's package for this release. - As I'm curious, I'm curious to read how you do that ;-) 2013/3/3 Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com For Ubuntu users (on the latest release [Raring]) simply issue these commands in a terminal: Ooops: I mean Quantal release ^ here. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/ -- Guilhem BONNEFILLE -=- JID: gu...@im.apinc.org MSN: guilhem_bonnefi...@hotmail.com -=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefi...@gmail.com -=- http://nathguil.free.fr/ -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
[Viking-devel] translation update
Hello, I step in the translation of viking after some time and I'm not sure how to distinguish translation of Track and Route. I expect that basic difference is that Track comes from device (and have timestamps), while Route I create in viking and later save to device? If so what is the reason to be able to create both types within viking? Up to now I used the very common translaton trasa which covers both Track and Route, so I have to separate the meaning somehow... regards Radek -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
Re: [Viking-devel] Ubuntu PPA For Viking 1.4
Nice news. Two comments: - How difficult it is to add Precise as target for the build? Precise is the current LTS, so I think it could be usefull to provide recent viking's package for this release. It shouldn't be difficult, but one may have to multiple 'changelog' files for each target. - As I'm curious, I'm curious to read how you do that ;-) I mostly followed the PPA help guidelines - I have some specific notes on my laptop about how to build for PPA Pre-steps: 1. Create a GPG Key 2. Sign Ubuntu code of conduct (with above key). PPA Steps + Howto Build Ubuntu/Debian Software 3. Create your PPA area on launchpad 4. Get source code, add debian directory + modify (with 'dch'), test (debuild -S) upload (with 'dput') -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
Re: [Viking-devel] translation update
Hello, I step in the translation of viking after some time and I'm not sure how to distinguish translation of Track and Route. Thank you very much for the translation efforts. I expect that basic difference is that Track comes from device (and have timestamps), while Route I create in viking and later save to device? Generally yes. I think of a Track as a path I've already been on, whereas a Route is a path I'm planning to take. If so what is the reason to be able to create both types within viking? It comes from the fact that they are separate types in the GPX Specification[1] and many (all?) GPS devices handle each type separately as well. For example when I upload routes to my Garmin Etrex, I can follow the route via a navigation mode; which gives a direction and estimated time of arrival at the next point. This can not be done with Tracks. (Although there is a special 'TracBack' mode to follow a track but it's somewhat different). [1] http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/0/gpx.xsd Up to now I used the very common translaton trasa which covers both Track and Route, so I have to separate the meaning somehow... Perhaps 'cesta'[2] would be alright? Or maybe go for more words if necessary with an interpretation of 'Planned Track' or similar instead. [2] http://translate.google.com/#auto/cs/route regards Radek -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/ -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
[Viking-devel] translation update
Hello, yes cesta could be used but not help me :-), but I hoped I'll get suggestion from czech users:-). I made some updates in meantime on lanchpad, so I hope it will not be worst. Anyhow what push me to start was your ppa for ubuntu, so thanks for all your work. Radek 2013/3/4 Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com Hello, I step in the translation of viking after some time and I'm not sure how to distinguish translation of Track and Route. Thank you very much for the translation efforts. I expect that basic difference is that Track comes from device (and have timestamps), while Route I create in viking and later save to device? Generally yes. I think of a Track as a path I've already been on, whereas a Route is a path I'm planning to take. If so what is the reason to be able to create both types within viking? It comes from the fact that they are separate types in the GPX Specification[1] and many (all?) GPS devices handle each type separately as well. For example when I upload routes to my Garmin Etrex, I can follow the route via a navigation mode; which gives a direction and estimated time of arrival at the next point. This can not be done with Tracks. (Although there is a special 'TracBack' mode to follow a track but it's somewhat different). [1] http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/0/gpx.xsd Up to now I used the very common translaton trasa which covers both Track and Route, so I have to separate the meaning somehow... Perhaps 'cesta'[2] would be alright? Or maybe go for more words if necessary with an interpretation of 'Planned Track' or similar instead. [2] http://translate.google.com/#auto/cs/route regards Radek -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb ___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/ -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
Re: [Viking-devel] translation update
Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com writes: Hello, I step in the translation of viking after some time and I'm not sure how to distinguish translation of Track and Route. Thank you very much for the translation efforts. I expect that basic difference is that Track comes from device (and have timestamps), while Route I create in viking and later save to device? Generally yes. I think of a Track as a path I've already been on, whereas a Route is a path I'm planning to take. I can see the point in that distinction, but I see it as Track is a sequence of points that is perhaps a record of where a device has been. It will typically but not always have elevations and timestamps. A route is a sequence of points that defines a way to get from here to there. It's more of a recipe for getting somewhere So I've pretty much agreed with Robert, but I find the have-been/planning secondary to the kind of data it is. One could generate a track object from a route, with timestamps, to be the track object that might be created from a person following the route. You can think of a track as maybe having thousands of points, whereas a route will typically have less than 10. pgp7zVAkdqn55.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb___ Viking-devel mailing list Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/
