VNC software for two local machines
I am looking for a software based on VNC I saw about two years ago but I forgot its name. It is a very interesting VNC software. Instead of helping users to access a remote machine from local (home) machine, that software helps users use two local machines in a very natural way. User will see monitors of both machines and users can move the mouse and focus from one monitor the the other one as if both monitors are connected to a dual-head display card in one machine. In this way, user can use one keyboard and one mouse to control two machines without the trouble of using Alt-Tab to switch between remote desktop and local desktop. Anyone here knows this software? Thanks, Chao ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: Re: Who can help me...?
Hi Joe!
Thanks for your quick response!
The first item sounds really good, because the error message (Page can not
be displayed) I know, if a page can't be reached (normally blocked by a
firewall)..
I'm using the free Version of Outpost Firewall and VNC is marked there as a
trusted application.
But XP offers a Firewall and maybe this one is active, too??
I'll check it next!
I know, I'm not at a XP-Newsgroup (sorry), but perhaps do you know how to
deactivate the XP-Firewall?
Cheers,
Chris
> Chris,
>
> if you've done all the correct port forwarding and have everything else
> setup.. the only 2 things i can think of are
>
> 1) XP firewall or some other firewall app is blocking the connection
>
> 2) (not sure but maybe) I think vnc's http app runs on java i've only used
> it a few times and it worked so I don't know if this is legit
> answermaybe get the latest java updates and make sure ie allows the
> java
> plugins to run...
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "James Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 1:09 PM
> Subject: RE: Re: Who can help me...?
>
>
> > Hi it's me again,
> >
> > now I've tried it by using http://computer-ip:5800.
> > I still get an error message, but another one: Page can not be
> displayed.
> >
> > I've also tried it within my local network. Port 5800 has also been
> > activated at my Router and incoming connections will be forwarded to my
> > pc.
> >
> > It's really strange, isn't it?
> >
> > Sorry for asking you so many times...
> >
> > Bye
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >> Chris,
> >>
> >> Your problem is that you are using http://computer-ip:5900
> >>
> >> Which causes your browser to try to do HTTP to the VNC port of your
> >> server.
> >>
> >> You need instead to use http://computer-ip:5800
> >>
> >> Which will point your browser at the HTTP port of the VNC Server.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> >>
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: 08 November 2004 14:41
> >> > To: James Weatherall
> >> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Subject: RE: Re: Who can help me...?
> >> >
> >> > That's what I'm typing in: http://computer-IP:5900
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I've also tried it within my local network by using the
> >> > internal IP of that pc. The error stays the same ("RFB 003.008").
> >> > I think within my local network, no port has to be activated, or?
> >> > But the message "RFB 003.008" will displayed, too...
> >> > I really don't know what's the matter?
> >> >
> >> > On every PC (within my local network) has been installed its
> Firewall.
> >> > But VNC has been set as "trusted application" and the
> >> > Internet Explorer, too...
> >> >
> >> > Do you still have any idea?
> >> >
> >> > cu
> >> > Chris
> >>
> >
> > --
> > NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> > GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum superg|nstigen Komplett-Preis!
> > ___
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
--
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum superg|nstigen Komplett-Preis!
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: Re: Who can help me...?
Chris,
if you've done all the correct port forwarding and have everything else
setup.. the only 2 things i can think of are
1) XP firewall or some other firewall app is blocking the connection
2) (not sure but maybe) I think vnc's http app runs on java i've only used
it a few times and it worked so I don't know if this is legit
answermaybe get the latest java updates and make sure ie allows the java
plugins to run...
Cheers,
Joe
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 1:09 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Who can help me...?
Hi it's me again,
now I've tried it by using http://computer-ip:5800.
I still get an error message, but another one: Page can not be displayed.
I've also tried it within my local network. Port 5800 has also been
activated at my Router and incoming connections will be forwarded to my
pc.
It's really strange, isn't it?
Sorry for asking you so many times...
Bye
Chris
Chris,
Your problem is that you are using http://computer-ip:5900
Which causes your browser to try to do HTTP to the VNC port of your
server.
You need instead to use http://computer-ip:5800
Which will point your browser at the HTTP port of the VNC Server.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 November 2004 14:41
> To: James Weatherall
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re: Who can help me...?
>
> That's what I'm typing in: http://computer-IP:5900
>
> Yes, I've also tried it within my local network by using the
> internal IP of that pc. The error stays the same ("RFB 003.008").
> I think within my local network, no port has to be activated, or?
> But the message "RFB 003.008" will displayed, too...
> I really don't know what's the matter?
>
> On every PC (within my local network) has been installed its Firewall.
> But VNC has been set as "trusted application" and the
> Internet Explorer, too...
>
> Do you still have any idea?
>
> cu
> Chris
--
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum superg|nstigen Komplett-Preis!
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Re: Who can help me...?
Hi it's me again,
now I've tried it by using http://computer-ip:5800.
I still get an error message, but another one: Page can not be displayed.
I've also tried it within my local network. Port 5800 has also been
activated at my Router and incoming connections will be forwarded to my pc.
It's really strange, isn't it?
Sorry for asking you so many times...
Bye
Chris
> Chris,
>
> Your problem is that you are using http://computer-ip:5900
>
> Which causes your browser to try to do HTTP to the VNC port of your
> server.
>
> You need instead to use http://computer-ip:5800
>
> Which will point your browser at the HTTP port of the VNC Server.
>
> Regards,
>
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 08 November 2004 14:41
> > To: James Weatherall
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Re: Who can help me...?
> >
> > That's what I'm typing in: http://computer-IP:5900
> >
> > Yes, I've also tried it within my local network by using the
> > internal IP of that pc. The error stays the same ("RFB 003.008").
> > I think within my local network, no port has to be activated, or?
> > But the message "RFB 003.008" will displayed, too...
> > I really don't know what's the matter?
> >
> > On every PC (within my local network) has been installed its Firewall.
> > But VNC has been set as "trusted application" and the
> > Internet Explorer, too...
> >
> > Do you still have any idea?
> >
> > cu
> > Chris
>
--
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum superg|nstigen Komplett-Preis!
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: VNC and Mozilla
Marjorie: I've experienced this behavior with my machine at home. It seems to be related to Flash Animation. Pages with Flash in them seem to cause Mozilla to just shut down. I wish I knew why. FWIW, I'm using a variant of VNC at work and at home, so things might be a bit different. -Original Message- From: Marjorie Wake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VNC and Mozilla I've been using VNC for a while now and haven't had any problems, until we became required to use the Mozilla 1.4 browser. Now anytime I launch a Mozilla browser window through my VNC connection, my session crashes. Is this a known bug? Is there a solution? Thanks, Marjie ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Display part of the screen
Hi! I'm using vncviewer and X11VNC. I would like to be able to display only a part of the screen (a definable area). Any one knows if this is possible (and how)? Thank you in advance, Sonia. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
VNC and Mozilla
I've been using VNC for a while now and haven't had any problems, until we became required to use the Mozilla 1.4 browser. Now anytime I launch a Mozilla browser window through my VNC connection, my session crashes. Is this a known bug? Is there a solution? Thanks, Marjie ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Connection problem using VNC Client
All: I am using VNC 4.0 server at my office workstation. At my home, I am using VNC 4.0. I can connect to VNC Server. But I do not see any desktop, it just shows me blank screen. And I can Browse through, my mouse movements are happening I can click on any icon on desktop and it works. I have the same resoultion , 1024X768 pixels at my work and home I have the same color bits, 32 at my work and home Can anyone help me in this, It URGENT!!! Thanks, Surendra - Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Wez: A fair point: I should more accurately say that with the echoServer approach, *most* end users will not have to make any firewall adjustments. The person running the echoServer may have to, although they are not necessarily an "end user" of the client software which uses their server. Thanks for letting me clarify; I didn't mean to come across as misleading. cheers, Scott On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote: Scott, Fair enough. The only comment I'd make is that the claim that you can exchange files using Kaboodle without modifying any firewall settings is not correct - you need the echoServer machine's firewall to be properly configured to let connections in, and you need to be sure that both ends allow outgoing connections, at least to the echoServer port. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. -Original Message- From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 November 2004 18:45 To: James Weatherall Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC Wez: My company provides the echoServer application for anyone to run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is being worked on). The idea is that a "community of users" will have one tech-savvy person who can run a server so the rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the details of firewalls or IP-addresses (or even dynamic DNS) anymore. Lots of value for $25, IMO. :) We're running a "demo" version of it for proof-of-concept with Kaboodle, but unlike GoToMyPC, we're interested in selling the server more than we are subscriptions to the service. cheers, Scott On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote: Hi Scott, Understood. The system you describe will work provided that the required ports are enabled for outgoing access through the firewalls at both ends, and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare server, which I assume you provide yourself? Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. -Original Message- From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13 To: James Weatherall Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC Wez: Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two Kaboodle users can VNC and file-transfer with each other. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Scott, Fair enough. The only comment I'd make is that the claim that you can exchange files using Kaboodle without modifying any firewall settings is not correct - you need the echoServer machine's firewall to be properly configured to let connections in, and you need to be sure that both ends allow outgoing connections, at least to the echoServer port. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 November 2004 18:45 > To: James Weatherall > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC > > Wez: > > My company provides the echoServer application for > anyone to run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is > being worked on). The idea is that a "community of users" > will have one tech-savvy person who can run a server so the > rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the details of > firewalls or IP-addresses (or even dynamic DNS) anymore. > Lots of value for $25, IMO. :) > > We're running a "demo" version of it for > proof-of-concept with Kaboodle, but unlike GoToMyPC, we're > interested in selling the server more than we are > subscriptions to the service. > > cheers, > Scott > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > Understood. The system you describe will work provided that the > > required ports are enabled for outgoing access through the > firewalls > > at both ends, and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare > > server, which I assume you provide yourself? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13 > >> To: James Weatherall > >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC > >> > >> Wez: > >> > >>Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two > Kaboodle users can > >> VNC and file-transfer with each other. > ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Wez: My company provides the echoServer application for anyone to run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is being worked on). The idea is that a "community of users" will have one tech-savvy person who can run a server so the rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the details of firewalls or IP-addresses (or even dynamic DNS) anymore. Lots of value for $25, IMO. :) We're running a "demo" version of it for proof-of-concept with Kaboodle, but unlike GoToMyPC, we're interested in selling the server more than we are subscriptions to the service. cheers, Scott On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote: Hi Scott, Understood. The system you describe will work provided that the required ports are enabled for outgoing access through the firewalls at both ends, and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare server, which I assume you provide yourself? Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. -Original Message- From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13 To: James Weatherall Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC Wez: Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two Kaboodle users can VNC and file-transfer with each other. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Hi Scott, Understood. The system you describe will work provided that the required ports are enabled for outgoing access through the firewalls at both ends, and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare server, which I assume you provide yourself? Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13 > To: James Weatherall > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC > > Wez: > > Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two > Kaboodle users can VNC and file-transfer with each other. > > As for what it implies about the firewalls...that's a > very big "it depends". Kaboodle uses the open-source > echoWare.DLL to establish a long-term TCP connection with an > echoServer called KaboodleProxy that acts as a "relay" > between Kaboodle clients. So if the firewall is smart enough > to block an echoWare to echoServer connection, then of course > it won't work. But consumer-grade firewall/routers like > LinkSys and Netgear products aren't that > smart: by default, they will allow out any outbound connections. > And since the echoServer owner can run that server on any > port they want (443, for example), the connection will be > passed on most commercial-grade firewalls -- with their out > of the box configuration -- as well. > > With the echoWare/echoServer approach, all of the > traffic looks like it's "outgoing", from the perspective of > the firewall. > Which is, of course, the same approach that VNC's "add > client" and SSH's "reverse tunnels" have been utilizing for years. > > cheers, > Scott > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote: > > >>Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today. > >> As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect > two networks > >> together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and > file-transfer across a > >> firewall/router without either side having to do any > port-forwarding > >> adjustments. No really. :) > > > > Through two *completely* closed firewalls, i.e. with no ports > > enabled/forwarded? Doesn't that imply that the firewalls really > > aren't doing a very good job? ;) > > > > Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Wez: Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two Kaboodle users can VNC and file-transfer with each other. As for what it implies about the firewalls...that's a very big "it depends". Kaboodle uses the open-source echoWare.DLL to establish a long-term TCP connection with an echoServer called KaboodleProxy that acts as a "relay" between Kaboodle clients. So if the firewall is smart enough to block an echoWare to echoServer connection, then of course it won't work. But consumer-grade firewall/routers like LinkSys and Netgear products aren't that smart: by default, they will allow out any outbound connections. And since the echoServer owner can run that server on any port they want (443, for example), the connection will be passed on most commercial-grade firewalls -- with their out of the box configuration -- as well. With the echoWare/echoServer approach, all of the traffic looks like it's "outgoing", from the perspective of the firewall. Which is, of course, the same approach that VNC's "add client" and SSH's "reverse tunnels" have been utilizing for years. cheers, Scott On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote: Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today. As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect two networks together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and file-transfer across a firewall/router without either side having to do any port-forwarding adjustments. No really. :) Through two *completely* closed firewalls, i.e. with no ports enabled/forwarded? Doesn't that imply that the firewalls really aren't doing a very good job? ;) Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Re: Who can help me...?
Chris,
Your problem is that you are using http://computer-ip:5900
Which causes your browser to try to do HTTP to the VNC port of your server.
You need instead to use http://computer-ip:5800
Which will point your browser at the HTTP port of the VNC Server.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 November 2004 14:41
> To: James Weatherall
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re: Who can help me...?
>
> That's what I'm typing in: http://computer-IP:5900
>
> Yes, I've also tried it within my local network by using the
> internal IP of that pc. The error stays the same ("RFB 003.008").
> I think within my local network, no port has to be activated, or?
> But the message "RFB 003.008" will displayed, too...
> I really don't know what's the matter?
>
> On every PC (within my local network) has been installed its Firewall.
> But VNC has been set as "trusted application" and the
> Internet Explorer, too...
>
> Do you still have any idea?
>
> cu
> Chris
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Re: Who can help me...?
That's what I'm typing in: http://computer-IP:5900
Yes, I've also tried it within my local network by using the internal IP of
that pc. The error stays the same ("RFB 003.008").
I think within my local network, no port has to be activated, or?
But the message "RFB 003.008" will displayed, too...
I really don't know what's the matter?
On every PC (within my local network) has been installed its Firewall.
But VNC has been set as "trusted application" and the Internet Explorer,
too...
Do you still have any idea?
cu
Chris
> What are you typing in to Internet Explorer to try to get to the applet
> page? Is it accessible locally, from the machine running the server?
>
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > Thanks for you quick response!
> >
> > Well, Port 5800 can't be blocked. In my Router Port 5800 is
> > activated and incoming connctions will be forwared to the PC,
> > VNC-Server has been installed...
> > In my Firewall the application IE has been accepted as
> > "trusted application".
> > So I don't have any idea, if there's another possibility to check..?
> >
> > The Java Virtual Maschine has also be installed and activated in IE.
> > The Appletts are also aktivated in IE's secure settings.
> >
> > But no chance to run the VNC-Applet...
> >
> > Who has any idea (sorry - I'm really frustrated..)?
> >
> > cu
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > On Friday 05 November 2004 15:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Recently Ive installed VNC for Windows (XP).
> > >
> > > The Server runs without any problems and the VNCViewer
> > works as well.
> > >
> > > The only thing having problems is the Java Applett Viewer
> > (using by
> > > Browser).
> > > I receive the following error messages:
> > >
> > > Within my local Network:
> > >
> > > http://computer-IP:5800 -> Page can not be displayed
> > You need to find out why IE cannot display the page...
> > is Java turned of?
> > is the 5800 port blocked?
> >
> > > http://computer-IP:5900 -> RFB 003.008
> > This is normal responce to Errorneously accessing the 5900
> > port from a browser.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > and with trying to access by an PC of Internet:
> > >
> >
> > Let's leave this for latter...
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Recently Ive installed VNC for Windows (XP).
> >
> > The Server runs without any problems and the VNCViewer works as well.
> >
> > The only thing having problems is the Java Applett Viewer
> > (using by Browser).
> > I receive the following error messages:
> >
> > Within my local Network:
> >
> > http://computer-IP:5800 -> Page can not be displayed
> > http://computer-IP:5900 -> RFB 003.008
> >
> >
> > and with trying to access by an PC of Internet:
> >
> > Server Error
> > The following error occurred:
> > [code=CANT_CONNECT] Could not connect because of networking problems.
> > Contact your system administrator.
> >
> > Please contact the administrator.
> >
> >
> >
> > The Browser, Im using is the IE6.0 (Virual Maschine has
> > already been activated).
> >
> > Im using a Router where Ports 5900 (VNC) and 5800 (JAVA)
> > have been activated and forwarded to the PC.
> >
> > The "Monitor Number" (for parameters) should not be needed,
> > because Im only using one PC within my local network.
> >
> > What could be the reasons and what can I do in order to
> > access by Web-Browser??
> >
> > cu
> > Chris
> >
> > --
> > Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD
> > ++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++
> > ___
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
> >
>
--
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum superg|nstigen Komplett-Preis!
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Allow Host name instead op ip in acces list
Lennard, Filtering based on host name is tricky, because the "efficient" way to do it involves a reverse-DNS lookup on the IP address of the incoming connection. With dynamic DNS services, though, this won't actually resolve to the "correct" name, so it won't work. The other key point to remember is that Hosts-based filtering is primarily used so that unknown hosts can't attack your machine, because the server will drop connections from them without processing them. This protection is less useful if their attempt to connect causes your server to spend resources looking up DNS names, and is completely useless if they manage to compromise your dynamic-DNS address... :) Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > I would like to acces my vnc server, which has a static ip, > from home where i have a dynamic ip. Via dyndns i have > created an account. I would like to add the dyndns host name > (eg. myname.dyndns.org) in the acces list (properties --> > connections --> add). However when i trie to add the hostname > it shows up as: > 255.255.255.255/0.0.0.0 and obviously this does not work. Is > there a solution to overcome this problem. > > Situation summary: > > vnc server with static ip > security by means of allowing only certain ip addresses vnc > client with dynamic ip, but static host name would like to > add static host name to allow list under connections tab in > vnc properties > > Thanks, > Lennard > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
> Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today. > As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect two > networks together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and > file-transfer across a firewall/router without either side > having to do any port-forwarding adjustments. No really. :) Through two *completely* closed firewalls, i.e. with no ports enabled/forwarded? Doesn't that imply that the firewalls really aren't doing a very good job? ;) Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Connections refused
"Connection refused" means that there is nothing listening on the specified network port on the server machine. Are you sure you are specifying the correct display number to VNC Viewer? Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Holmes > Sent: 06 November 2004 00:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Connections refused > > Good Evening: > > I am a fairly new Linux user, and a VERY new vnc user. > > I have the vnc server running on my Fedora Core 2 box, (I > downloaded the v3x software from the site) and I am trying to > access it from my windows XP station. I type in the IP > address of the FC2 box to the Viewer and I get a connection > refused error. > > The IPTables Firewall in FC2 is not active, and the Windows > firewall service has been disabled. Can someone please tell > me what I am doing wrong? > > Here is the error message I am getting > > Unable to connect to host: Connection refused (10061) > > I suspect that I have a configuration issue some place, but I > am just not sure where. > > Thanks > > Tim > > Tim Holmes > > IT Manager > Medina Christian Academy, Inc. > A Higher Standard... > > Jeremiah 33:3 > Jeremiah 29:11 > Esther 4:14 > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Port forwarding?
Angelo, That's upside-down thinking, in that if UPnP is present then the security risk is there - not using it to make it easier to use a particular program simply means that user's gain no benefit from it, even though they still have the extra risk! Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angelo Sarto > Sent: 06 November 2004 07:33 > To: Vince > Cc: James Weatherall; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Port forwarding? > > U'PnP is sometimes considered a security risk as it would > allow a compromised computer to open any port of it's choosing; > > although maybe some one would like to make a vnc/upnp wrapper? > > > --Angelo > > > On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 07:40:43 +0100, Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another one, but this may help... > > > > is it possible to let vnc do it's own forwarding, by using upnp? > > i've seen that even old (~10 years) programs know how to > set it up... > > (ie, my 1994 monopoly game cd with M$ DirectPlay does just that) > > > > not that i know all about upnp, > > but it looks like it can also check if it's running ok, and if not, > > request the next available port. > > maybe we can skip this, by adding a 'use this port or exit' > box or something? > > > > ViNCe > > ___ > > VNC-List mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To remove yourself from the list visit: > > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Re: Who can help me...?
What are you typing in to Internet Explorer to try to get to the applet page? Is it accessible locally, from the machine running the server? Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > > Thanks for you quick response! > > Well, Port 5800 can't be blocked. In my Router Port 5800 is > activated and incoming connctions will be forwared to the PC, > VNC-Server has been installed... > In my Firewall the application IE has been accepted as > "trusted application". > So I don't have any idea, if there's another possibility to check..? > > The Java Virtual Maschine has also be installed and activated in IE. > The Appletts are also aktivated in IE's secure settings. > > But no chance to run the VNC-Applet... > > Who has any idea (sorry - I'm really frustrated..)? > > cu > Chris > > > On Friday 05 November 2004 15:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Recently Ive installed VNC for Windows (XP). > > > > The Server runs without any problems and the VNCViewer > works as well. > > > > The only thing having problems is the Java Applett Viewer > (using by > > Browser). > > I receive the following error messages: > > > > Within my local Network: > > > > http://computer-IP:5800 -> Page can not be displayed > You need to find out why IE cannot display the page... > is Java turned of? > is the 5800 port blocked? > > > http://computer-IP:5900 -> RFB 003.008 > This is normal responce to Errorneously accessing the 5900 > port from a browser. > > > > > > > and with trying to access by an PC of Internet: > > > > Let's leave this for latter... > > Jerry > > > > > Hi! > > Recently Ive installed VNC for Windows (XP). > > The Server runs without any problems and the VNCViewer works as well. > > The only thing having problems is the Java Applett Viewer > (using by Browser). > I receive the following error messages: > > Within my local Network: > > http://computer-IP:5800 -> Page can not be displayed > http://computer-IP:5900 -> RFB 003.008 > > > and with trying to access by an PC of Internet: > > Server Error > The following error occurred: > [code=CANT_CONNECT] Could not connect because of networking problems. > Contact your system administrator. > > Please contact the administrator. > > > > The Browser, Im using is the IE6.0 (Virual Maschine has > already been activated). > > Im using a Router where Ports 5900 (VNC) and 5800 (JAVA) > have been activated and forwarded to the PC. > > The "Monitor Number" (for parameters) should not be needed, > because Im only using one PC within my local network. > > What could be the reasons and what can I do in order to > access by Web-Browser?? > > cu > Chris > > -- > Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD > ++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++ > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: VNC drops after ppp connection
Huey, The most likely cause of this problem is that you have misconfigured the PPP connection at the first XP machine to be tagged as an Internet connection, so that the first XP machine tries to use it for all Internet traffic (including the VNC traffic back to the 2K machine) and so sends it to the wrong place... Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huey Yu > Sent: 05 November 2004 18:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VNC drops after ppp connection > > I connect my Win/2K to a Win/XP via VNC over TCP/IP. I then > dial from the Win/XP up to a third system, also Win/XP, to > establish PPP connections between the two. As soon as my PPP > connection is established, my VNC connection dropped. I need > to disconnect my PPP connection before I can connect back in via VNC. > > > > Win/2K <-- VNC/TCP/IP --> Win/XP <-- PPP/Dialup --> Win/XP > > > > Any suggestion? > > > > Huaiyeu 'Huey' Yu > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 201-261-0001 ext 236 > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: RE: Need help with my local network ...
Vdiesl, > Not sure I understand what u mean. > On both computers I have : > Accept connections on port : 5955 > Serve Java viewer via HTTP on port : 5855. > > I tried again to use vncviewer from icon "Run vncviewer" or > from explorer "http://192.168.0.1:"; (is there a > difference ?) and in the following cases : > 192.168.0.1:55, 192.168.0.1:5955, 192.168.0.1:5855 (btw I > thought was supposed to be 0 !?) Xxxx will only be 0 if you have left VNC running on the default ports (5900 and 5800). Since you have changed them to 5955 and 5855, you will need to use :55 or :5955, which are equivalent for VNC. As for the address, 192.168.0.1 is a LAN-only address, inaccessible via the Internet. It's also normally the address used by your LAN's router/switch if you have one. > P.S.: still doesn't understand how to reply a message w/o > opening a new thread :/null Just use "Reply To All" to reply to the original poster & to the list. Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: Multi-display VNC?
Ron, At the present time, only VNC Enterprise Edition supports remoting of individual displays in multi-monitor systems, via addition of a REG_SZ DisplayDevice registry entry, set to the device name to remote e.g. \\.\DISPLAY1. Regards, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Crummett > Sent: 05 November 2004 17:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Multi-display VNC? > > There are times that I need to use VNC to connect to a PC > that has two displays. Is there any way I can specify which > display I access, or is it possible to access both? > > That's it from here. More to come as the plot thickens... > > Ron Crummett > CayNet Consulting, LLC > (208) 424-1590 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.caynetco.com > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type > application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
