Re: [volt-nuts] *WAY* too expensive for even Keysight to redesign

2015-05-13 Thread Marv @ Home
Aside, there are private fabrication houses that make short runs of 
obsolete chips in order to keep mission critical electronics running, 
such as in aerospace and military applications.  I'm not sure what 
Keysight would actually do, but I would presume not only do they 
stockpile key parts, both active and passives, as well as full boards 
for board level swaps, but periodic re-checking their inventory for 
functional integrity can be a never ending task as components age 
beyond their expected operational life.  If parts truly were to 
become obsolete even beyond private fabrication, their management 
should design replacements boards and field test them way in advance 
of parts becoming extinct, until they decided the product was not 
worth maintaining.


http://www.lansdale.com/


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Transmille 8081

2015-04-23 Thread Marv @ Home

Some points of interest:

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/8-5-digit-dmm/msg527708/#msg527708

http://bbs.38hot.net/thread-719-1-1.html

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/8-5-digit-dmm/?action=dlattach;attach=56377;image

Beyond specs, another consideration is total ownership cost: 
calibration  repair.



___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] The Art of Electronics

2015-04-18 Thread Marv @ Home
When AoE was released in 1980, the intended audience was electronics 
for a non-EE major.  How this morphed into an engineering text shows 
how what is 'core' has changed.  It had a friendly style, akin to 
having a instructor with you.  AoE was best read in chapter sequence 
through the fundamentals, and higher chapters expect readers to know 
material from previous chapters without reference to it.  On occasion 
it used concepts a jump forward but could be figured out by cross 
referencing its index.  It was a semester course for us back in early 1980s.


AoE v2 updated more in the digital domain with many corrected errata 
and typos from V1.


I'd wait for V3 2nd printing or later, as typos from 1st printing are 
being reported as well as I read references to unpublished chapter 
Xs not in this printing.


TS is an excellent text, if you already know the material and just 
need a refresher.  It gets to the point quickly.


Only 2 TS editions were translated to English; German has ?10+ 
editions.  The only edition I ever looked at in print was v1, and it 
was $180+ in 1990s, compared to $50 for AoE new, or $20+ used.  TS 
used in the USA is harder to find, and few V1 I've seen sell near $100+.


Student or someone with a cursory interest, cost, writing style and 
similar breadth could be a tie breaker, AoE V3 sells for ~$100 
delivered, and V2 $20-30 used.  TS V2 from 2008 is ~$US260 delivered.



At 04:33 AM 4/17/2015, Attila Kinali wrote:

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:24:38 +
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:

 How does it compare to the gold standard of the TietzeSchenk?

 No idea.

If you know a bit of german, get yourself a copy of it.
You will love the in-depth explanations of the various
electronics compontents. Also you can use it to knock
out any burglar, should the need arise ;-)

 You have to remember that not everybody here are professional electronics
 people, I'm a software person who knows enough electronics to be useful
 without being dangerous, and I've certainly learned a lot from AOE3
 over breakfast this past week.

True that. The AoE gives at least a nice overview of quite a few
electronics techniques. And probably not the worst thing you can
start with, when you are new to electronics.

That said, I kind of miss the amateur radio/electronics literature
that was so abundant in the 80s. They really did a good job of
introducing various circuits and how successfully build them if
you don't have any professional equipment.

Attila Kinali


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] The Art of Electronics

2015-04-18 Thread Marv @ Home
Orin, that's a great resource, thanks a bunch.  I forgot all about 
Abe's Books.  AoE 2nd Edition Int'l version new in $10-15 range.


At 05:15 PM 4/18/2015, Orin Eman wrote:

Try searching for the TS V2 ISBN,

3540004297

on www.abebooks.com

$40 for the International Edition from a somewhat reputable seller.
Since this is an international list, I have no qualms about passing
this on.  Whether you can stand the almost transparent paper and
smudgy ink is a different matter.

Orin.


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Multimeter input terminal wear

2014-08-16 Thread Marv @ Home
I have some 30+ year old devices still in operation and over time, 
dirt and less so, oxidation of the contact surfaces, are more 
problems than the integrity of the jack's connection by 
friction.  Manufacturers and counterfeiter can make very poor jacks, 
but the good ones have been trouble free.


When specified, the spec sheet entry for jack 'wear' is called 
mating durability cycles or variations in those words.  The typical 
brand name banana jack is rated to  10,000 mating cycles, i.e, 
connect-disconnect.  Thus, is would imply the less you un/mate it, 
the longer it last.





At 06:37 AM 8/16/2014, Andrea Baldoni wrote:

Hello!

When the multimeter is not in use for some time (say, a day), do you 
think it's

better to leave the banana plugs inserted, or to take them out?
There is a certain wear in plugging and unplugging, but letting 
always in could

enlarge the input jacks as well.

Best regards,
Andrea Baldoni
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Datron 1082

2014-05-08 Thread Marv @ Home
Just a side comment, if this battery is the same as the one made by 
the company Tenergy in Fremont, CA, they are just shy of 10 years 
old, so it looks like this Datron 1082 has had its battery changed 
once in recent memory.



At 12:25 AM 4/23/2014, Randy Evans wrote:

I just took out the battery and it is a Tenergy 3.6 VDC 1200mAH ER14250
with tabs welded on.

Randy


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] What is Transfer Accuracy?

2014-05-04 Thread Marv @ Home

I think its fuzzy but most all good DMM have it specified using some term.

Its a term I see HP or Agilent use mostly.

Fluke 5808a uses the term 'Transfer Uncertainty', which is inline 
with metrology replacing the term 'accuracy' with 'uncertainty' _and_ 
a confidence interval [ which was undefined by the term 'accuracy'].


A common understanding of 'transfer accuracy' presumes it could be 
used as a transfer reference in a pinch.  Transfer references in 
general are secondary references used to transfer the primary 
reference value to other devices; a Fluke 732b is a transfer 
reference, its portable and has defined accuracy to 30 days, while 
the primary reference, say a Josephson Junction, cannot be moved from 
its location.


Per manual, the 3458a 'transfer accuracy' are specified for 10 
minutes to a primary reference and requires the original calibration 
temperature +/- specified limits [ this is vital to control for ppm 
drift/temp].  For 10V scale, 10 minute accuracy is 0.05ppm, its 24h 
spec: 0.5 ppm + 0.05 ppm of scale.  The other quoted accuracy is the 
1 hr accuracy of 0.1ppm.


As Dr. Frank points out very well the great value of this spec is 
making ratio measurements.  However, its not implied by the stated 
manual specification.  OTAH 10 minutes or even 1hr is barely enough 
time to run from the primary standard to your lab, so it must be used 
in other ways.


Ratio measurements are independent of DMM drift since calibration: 
its most dependent on the shortest term accuracy, aka 'transfer 
accuracy', ambient temperature, linearity of the device and 
naturally, the accuracy of your reference.  Based on the manual 
specs, the longer you delay making the ratio measurement the more 
likely the 3458a will drift, so keeping it under 10 min give you the 
best results; beyond it you're then at the 1 hour accuracy, and 
beyond 1 hr, you'd use the 24 hr accuracy.




At 12:44 PM 5/4/2014, Jan Fredriksson wrote:

Is there a common understanding about what transfer accuracy means or is
it more of a fuzzy term?
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] VS330

2013-09-21 Thread Marv @ Home
Finally got to see it, thanks for making it available, its now online 
via K04BB's site.  Its very similar to its other voltage references 
such as the MV106 but the best thing is its impressive voltage range 
at ~30ppm/yr worse case accuracy.


At 12:32 AM 9/12/2013, Joseph Gray wrote:

I did finally get a manual for the EDC VS330 DC Voltage Standard from
Khron-Hite. I asked them if it was OK to upload it the the KO4BB site.
After two weeks and no reply, I figured they didn't care, so I uploaded it.
It should appear for download sometime soon.

Joe Gray
W5JG


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Calibration and Certification - Trust and detail

2013-08-13 Thread Marv @ Home
Its one reason to obtain a 3456a and keep as a reference DMM, you can 
take the modern meter as a workhorse and give it wear and tear.  Now 
a choice between the 3456a and 3457a I leave to the owner's need for 
the trade offs between them.


At 02:17 AM 8/13/2013, Robert Atkinson wrote:

Hi ,
Newer does not mean better. It's not nuts level, but my Fluke 
8060A 4.5 digit handhelds are more accurate and stable than my newer 
89 IV. However most engineers would pick up the 89.
I agree with Dave on UK  engineers For many years I've been a 
member of the very few groups of engineer in the UK who need a 
licence to do their job - aircraft, but even that has been diluted 
since EU regulations came into force. I'm also a Chartered Engineer 
similar to PE in the USA. As I understand it most US States require 
you to be a PE before you can do business as an Engineer. In the 
UK it's a bloke with an oily rag and big hammer :-(


Robert CEng MRAeS G8RPI


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Calibration Device

2013-08-13 Thread Marv @ Home
As digits rise, applications are less 'general', but these meters at 
the outset were mostly for labs, not for servicing.  Work in 
instrumentation: sensors, transducers etc., can use uV precision 
foremost, accuracy preferred.  A diff DVM is ideal but not necessary, 
a sensitive DMM is a cheaper substitute.


http://www.sensorland.com/HowPage078.html



At 12:09 PM 8/12/2013, J. Forster wrote:

My main interest is as a 'sanity check'. I use DMMs for engineering purposes.

Shields up:

IMO, there are very few applications, other than fundamental physics
research, that really NEED 5,6,7, or 8+ digits.

I would no more use a multi digit DVM to do what can be done with a
differential voltmeter than use a carrier phase tracking GPS to measure
for a living room carpet.

Shields down.

-John




Sincerely,



Marv
Philadelphia, PA  


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Leave it on?

2013-08-10 Thread Marv @ Home
If its likely still in cal after being in storage for ? years, it 
likely doesn't matter.


In general, its best never to turn off high accuracy devices once 
they are in a stable state.  Aging of references is more reliable [ 
i.e., reduced uncertainty] when the device is kept under power. Its a 
bigger issue with 7.5 digit DMM and more.


The EDC calibrators were made to be portable, however in the specs 
the shortest term accuracy rating, ~ 1 hr of 5ppm suggests to me the 
unit performs best if left powered on, if used as a reference.  If 
may not hold at 5ppm to a year, but it likely may be better than its 
30ppm or so, worse case.  With the unit on, the quiescent operating 
temp of the device plus stable lab temperatures eliminates thermal 
shock as one factor to destabilize your reference's setting.



At 01:27 AM 8/9/2013, Joseph Gray wrote:

Since the VS330 is designed to be a portable voltage standard, is it better
to leave it on all the time or not? The manuals for other models don't say,
but they do talk about the short power up time to achieve rated accuracy.
So far, I have left it on.



___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Fluke 510A

2013-08-10 Thread Marv @ Home
A 6.5 or better will find a good home and be appreciated in your lab, 
Joe.  Many orphans need homes always appear on eBay, particularly the 
top line of its day HPs: 3455a, 3456a, and 3457a.


There is a lot of discussion on the pros and cons of each throughout 
the archives, but any will be an order of magnitude better than the 5.5 digit.



At 02:33 PM 8/10/2013, Joseph Gray wrote:

Oops. It was getting late and I guess my fingers typed the wrong digit :-).

Yes, I was thinking about getting a better DMM.

Joe Gray
W5JG




Sincerely,



Marv
Philadelphia, PA 


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] DMM calibration

2013-08-07 Thread Marv @ Home
I don't know what logo cal is, but between Z540 and 17025 is a 
question of procedures and how they are done.
In metrology the procedures, and how strict they are, reduce the risk 
of uncertainty in the final measurement.  For example, some 
procedures in Z540 can be 'interpreted' where in 17025 is explicit, 
thus there is more room in Z540 for one lab to be worse than another, 
or vice versa, which defeats the purpose of standardization.  This 
'intepretation' is fairly reduced when the device is cal'd by an 
autocalibrator such for close case calibration DMMs, but becomes a 
big issue with any manual cal.


If these do not mean anything to you and you do not need the data for 
long term drift calculations, ISO 9001 is good to go.


IMHO the difference between all 3 is insignificant for 5.5 digit 
DMMs, except for one's need for data.



http://us.flukecal.com/literature/articles-and-education/temperature-calibration/papers-articles/comparison-ansincsl-z540-1?geoip=1

At 12:30 PM 8/7/2013, Joseph Gray wrote:

I just got the following quote for getting my HP 3478A calibrated.

35.00 for ISO 9001 no data
87.50 for Z540 with data and uncertainties
275.00 for 17025 with data, uncertainties and logo calibration.

I still didn't get any explaination as to exactly what the lab does for
each of these price points. When I asked about the Level 4 listed next to
the meter, I was told that it is the difficulty level. Still not telling me
much. I have read the procedure in the HP service manual and it is very
easy. You set some volt, amp, ohm values on the standard, then push some
buttons on the meter.

I understand about getting data or not, it is the other aspects that I
don't understand. What is Z540, 17025 and logo calibration?


Joe Gray
W5JG




Sincerely,



Marv
Philadelphia, PA 


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] EDC VS330 Voltage Standard

2013-08-06 Thread Marv @ Home
I've seen many EDC/KH calibrator models but your VSS 330 is novel; 
most of EDC's popular calibrators were precision low voltage types; 
VS330 has such a wide dynamic range, 100nV to 300VDC, 30 ppm.  The 
variants of the 100 were popular i.e., 103, 106, 106J etc., IIRC the 
manual for those models are almost identical except for the added 
functions that were linked to the key reference board.


Additional specs:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/EDC-VS330-/141017199834?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item20d547b4da

EDC made a good number of products with variations and judging from 
KH selection, not all of the documentation was salvaged when KH bought EDC.



At 09:08 PM 8/5/2013, Joseph Gray wrote:

I got another response from K-H. They also won't calibrate this model.

So far, the only place that I have found a manual is Surplus Sales. They
list a copy of the manual for $20. I'll think about it while I keep
looking for a free one.

Joe Gray
W5JG




Sincerely,



Marv
Philadelphia, PA  


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.