RE: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
From: a.ashfield 

Jones,
Big though it is, it is not large compared with the  100 billion galaxies
in the Universe.

No but it is by far the most massive structure that we presently are aware
of.  And the fact it has gone undetected until 2015 raises many issues about
prior assumptions used in our models (and our capability to understand the
cosmos). Not to mention, what other major surprises like this one await
discovery?

In our frame of reference, this object is spewing out the equivalent energy
of 3000 Milky Way galaxies most of which have their own black holes, and
3000 galaxies (450 trillion suns) is a small fraction of all galaxies. Yet
this overlooks its great age, which then begs the question: since the quasar
is almost as old as the Universe, as we are seeing it now - how much more
mass has it gained in the intervening 12 billion years, unbeknownst to us -
and will it spew out increasing amounts of energy over time? It will be most
interesting if 100 years from now, someone notices that its energy emission
has increased substantially.

Mind boggling.

attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Eric Walker
About the big bang theory -- my understanding is that it requires faster
than light expansion in the earliest period.  A theory that says the rules
change at some point in time seems a bit ad hoc to me.

About the huge black hole -- what are the chances that it looks like a
black hole from our perspective, but from another angle looks like
something quite different?

Eric


Re: [Vo]:still waiting for the essential LENR info of yesterady

2015-02-28 Thread Axil Axil
Why does everybody assume that the EMF that Rossi sends to the hearer coils
reinforces the reaction. It could just as well retard the reaction to kept
it under control.

A gas heated E Cat could explode all the time, whereas a electrical heated
E Cat is well controlled. A high frequency RF signal may be embedded in the
power feed to the heater coil along with the 60 cycle power cycle.  The
power supply to the heater coil is secret for a good reason, it keeps the
BANG from happening.

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Friends,

 I am sending you the daily:

 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/day-6-what-have-we-learned.html

 but we have not learned the essentials coming fro Mosoow snd Milano.
 Patience and weekend were not created for me.
 My guess is that 5 minutes after sending this- the much awaited info will
 be on the Web.
 See you later!
 Peter

 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com



Re:[Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread a.ashfield

Jones,
Big though it is, it is not large compared with the  100 billion 
galaxies in the Universe.


Re: [Vo]:All important product

2015-02-28 Thread Analog Fan
Papp had no product? Au contraire! He had a working atomic submarine and made a 
solo trip from Europe to Canada in 13 hours. He even wrote a book about it. 
Anyone read it?
Hundreds of Fathoms: Who was Josef Papp?

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Hundreds of Fathoms: Who was Josef Papp?Josef Papp was a Hungarian-Canadian 
engineer who in 1966 claimed to have built the worlds fastest submarine with a 
speed of over 300 MPH.  |
|  |
| View on lubbers-line.blogspo... | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

 

 On Friday, February 27, 2015 3:31 PM, Lennart Thornros 
lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
   

 Hello Axil, I do not know much about dark matter but I hope your insight is as 
good when it comes to the general statement about inventors. Unfortunately 
there is another factor contributing to the problem (I think it is a problem 
that needs a solution) and that is the factor of secrecy / the patent illusion. 
I also think like you that Mills has no interest in a product rather a nobel 
prize.I hear that LENR is proven and that there is no doubt any longer. As I 
mentioned above I do not have the capacity to evaluate the many theories and 
how they fit with the experiments. I do believe there is something - call it 
overunity, which is proven. However, I have no clear feeling for that COP's of 
10 or even 5 is achieved. Seems all experiments are coming with several 
ambiguous test methods. If the COP is low and the difficulties are large and 
require sophisticated design combined with expensive reactors the breakthrough 
will not come fast.Lots of clever engineering will be required. The only 
solution is a more open and organized effort to do this engineering. For 
inventors a ROssi it might be a catch 22. If he does not give away the 
knowledge to a group big enough to reach result quickly he will not live long 
enough to benefit to an enormous reward and if he share the cake might be 
smaller.I had hoped to  see more action from AR's partners toward a product. 
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com 
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to 
excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

Rossi is right, the important thing is the product...all else is chatter. 
Without a product, you have nothing.Joe Papp had a working over unity energy 
device a half century ago. The Papp engine was verified, certified, demoed, 
patented, and whatever else was necessary to give his investors a warm feeling 
but Papp never placed his invention into production. Why, because Papp could 
not produce a product and he did not want to produce a product. Producing a 
product is far harder than producing a prototype. Most genius engineers don’t 
want to meet all the regulations and requirements necessary, endure all the 
heartache, feel all the pain necessary to get a product to a buyer.There are 
few Bill Gates and Steve Jobs in this world. Mills makes a good life tinkering 
with his prototypes and writing his theories. He cannot produce a product or 
down deep in his heart he does not want to be bothered with a product and so he 
joins the other chattereres as Rossi is apt to say.



   

[Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
Here is a big story for Mauro Lacy, if he is still tuned into Vortex, or
anyone else with cosmology credentials .

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-02/anu-afi022415.php

This impossible object presents us with the distinct possibility of a new
version of the Big Bang which can explain Universal expansion in a unique
way. This could be called bifurcated expansion. which is basically a
single expansion, followed by the early contraction of a fraction of the
original mass; and then a continuing expansion or the remainder - all in the
first billion years.

The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model and it proposes
that the Universe was in a very high density state and expanded with a
single bang approximately 13.8 billion years ago and that matter and
antimatter were not created in equal amounts. But [SDSS J0100+2802] as the
ultra-luminous quasar is called, is too large for the Big Bang model to
accommodate. Effectively all bets are now off, since the Big Bang theory
will be shown to be incorrect by this discovery. 

This object is a singularity which could be telling us that IT alone is the
actual locus - the place of origin of the Universe, and that everything
subsequently derived from this exact location (which is between Pisces and
Andromeda from our perspective). Thus, what we have is an initial Creation
event which expanded for many millions of years but which then cooled and
underwent a basic change - so that part of the total mass (perhaps half)
coalesced and contracted, while the other half continued to expand, gaining
velocity from the half which contracted. We could surmise that the half
which coalesced was antimatter, or at least another form of matter (mirror
matter) and the half that continued to expand is the regular matter, which
we know and love. The implication is that [SDSS J0100+2802] is composed
exclusively of antimatter (or mirror matter).

You heard it first on vortex. :-)




[Vo]:Greenyer- Parkhomov collaboration

2015-02-28 Thread Peter Gluck
It arrived an hour later as I guessed

it is: gooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/from-bob-greenyer.html

Still open-ended, the rest tomorrow.
Enjoy!
Peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


[Vo]:still waiting for the essential LENR info of yesterady

2015-02-28 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Friends,

I am sending you the daily:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/day-6-what-have-we-learned.html

but we have not learned the essentials coming fro Mosoow snd Milano.
Patience and weekend were not created for me.
My guess is that 5 minutes after sending this- the much awaited info will
be on the Web.
See you later!
Peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Bob Cook
Eric brings up a good point.   I think the concept is that we are looking at a 
polar end of the thing putting out all the energy near the 13 B year mark.  
What is the subtended solid angle that we see?  Is it a fine line that is able 
to emit the light?  If this is the case there must be many others oriented in a 
different direction that we do not see.  Some may be significantly larger black 
holes.  I also not understood the concept of the expanding space and what 
influences its rate.  That may have a theory to explain it.

Bob 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Eric Walker 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 4:37 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?


  About the big bang theory -- my understanding is that it requires faster than 
light expansion in the earliest period.  A theory that says the rules change at 
some point in time seems a bit ad hoc to me.


  About the huge black hole -- what are the chances that it looks like a black 
hole from our perspective, but from another angle looks like something quite 
different?


  Eric



[Vo]:Re: CMNS: Greenyer- Parkhomov collaboration

2015-02-28 Thread Peter Gluck
This morning I copied it from the Facebook page of MFMP to my blog.

Greenyer made an excellent work- now it is upon him and his colleagues to
replicate.The saga continues and it is a LENR+ saga (2000 W, 1.5 MWatthours)
Peter

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Smith.JD - iPad only smith...@me.com
wrote:

 I believe that this is the correct URL.
 I inserted an 'e' in front...

 URL = http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/from-bob-greenyer.html





 On Feb 28, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 It arrived an hour later as I guessed

 it is: gooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/from-bob-greenyer.html

 Still open-ended, the rest tomorrow.
 Enjoy!
 Peter

 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 CMNS group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to cmns+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to c...@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 CMNS group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to cmns+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to c...@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:still waiting for the essential LENR info of yesterady

2015-02-28 Thread Peter Gluck
The problem is if what happens at 400-600 C is the same that happens at
1100 1300 C

Peter

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why does everybody assume that the EMF that Rossi sends to the hearer
 coils reinforces the reaction. It could just as well retard the reaction to
 kept it under control.

 A gas heated E Cat could explode all the time, whereas a electrical heated
 E Cat is well controlled. A high frequency RF signal may be embedded in the
 power feed to the heater coil along with the 60 cycle power cycle.  The
 power supply to the heater coil is secret for a good reason, it keeps the
 BANG from happening.

 On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Dear Friends,

 I am sending you the daily:

 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/day-6-what-have-we-learned.html

 but we have not learned the essentials coming fro Mosoow snd Milano.
 Patience and weekend were not created for me.
 My guess is that 5 minutes after sending this- the much awaited info will
 be on the Web.
 See you later!
 Peter

 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com