RE: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English
Higgins— I second Jed’s thanks for the AP paper translation. Its seems to nail down the results of 22 years (at least) of the Ni-H LENR system R&D. S. Forcardi and other Italians should get the credit it seems to me. I also consider that Rossi has been able to improve upon the COP’s of the system by finding compatible combinations of Li, H, Ni nano particle characteristics, and, primarily control circuit resonance to allow minimal energy input and long term self sustaining operations. Those non-believers of Rossi’s capabilities are akin to those folks that believe the Earth is only 6000 years old who live with dogmas and/or a conflict of interest. Their idea of fraud is not unlike the fraud they seem to say God committed on mankind when he also left evidence of dinosaurs on the earth. The non- believers will continue to insist the E- Cat and Quark-X advanced performances are merely illusions and the results of Rossi’s magical tricks or fraudulent actions. Bob Cook They will continue to claim the E- Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2016 3:20 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English Translated by Bob Higgins. Thanks, Bob! https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/1071-ParkhomovPresentation-20161124-English-pdf/
RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core
YES,YES,YES! Scientific American should follow on Natures heals, as will other related publishers within the establishment’s publishing cult. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Russ George Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 8:58 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core What a delight to see this new paper. So the Journal Nature has now come around from its flagrant condemnation and ridicule of all things cold fusion to publishing about it being the source of heat in the inner Earth (and other planets of course). I can testify that I engaged in a discussion of this very mechanism with Martin Fleischmann at the very first meeting on cold fusion while he and Giuliani Preparata and I shared a bottle of wine to cool our tempers if not our passion. Here’s a link to my blog post about my late friends, http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2015/09/04/guilliano-martin-john-now-richard/ . The dastardly pundits at Nature deserve a special place in hell for their avaricious dogmatic approach to discovery of the mysteries of Nature. I am quite sure Maddox is occupying a well-deserved spit there now. The great tragedy of science is that most of the community behave like gentlemen but of course being the real substance of the stew of knowledge they are not what floats to the top, what floats is the scum and there is no greater repository of the scum and shysters of Science than the editors and publishers and owners of the Journal Nature. Within the microcosm of the ecology of atoms the Earthly core conditions described in this paper are not at all uncommon. That is why cold fusion is and always has and will be a principal part of behavior of hydrogen in nature. From: H LV [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 8:21 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core Q: why don't lighter elements find there way to the centre of the Earth if gravity is lowest at the centre? Harry New study indicates Earth's inner core was formed 1 - 1.5 billion years ago October 7, 2015 http://phys.org/news/2015-10-earth-core-billion-years.html On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, H LV wrote: Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37740 <> Harry
RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core
Harry— That’s a good question. I have never seen a model that considers the actual gravitational field experienced throughout the earth resulting in the increased pressures with depth to the center and thereabouts. At first glance it would seem that radial forces would go to zero which by definition is no pressure. Thus it would seem that the radial force would increase along the radius until it reached a maximum at some depth below the surface and then, deceased to zero again in space beyond earth’s influence. I am interested in any analysis that gives a high pressure at the center. I would think that dense particles in a liquid that allows settling would tend to move along the gravitational field unless atomic and molecular forces become more dominant and somehow hold heavy atoms in a lighter lattice at some radius above the origin—center. Does any Vort know of an answer? Bob Cook : H LV Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 8:21 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core Q: why don't lighter elements find there way to the centre of the Earth if gravity is lowest at the centre? Harry New study indicates Earth's inner core was formed 1 - 1.5 billion years ago October 7, 2015 http://phys.org/news/2015-10-earth-core-billion-years.html On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, H LV wrote: Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37740 <> Harry
RE: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core
Harry— Recent items in Sci Am are about guested at sources of energy on icy moons with underlying water. Both Jupiter and Saturn have such moons. Enceladus manages to expel steam through cracks in the ice sheet—many km thick—some without condensing the steam as ice. Lots of local heat I would think. I doubt tidal Forces can do that. I think that nano silica is the host for LENR in the cracks of the ice sheet which may create significant pressures under tidal forces which do apparent happen on this moon. For those interested the item about Enceladus it’s in the October issue of Sci-Am, page 38. I do not consider the geothermal generation of the nano silica reported in the rings around Saturn associated with is moon is as suggested by the authors of the item. I would guess it stems from crystallization of soluble silica under pressure in the ice layer of Enceladus, not at the water-basement rock interface as suggested in the item. As an aside, I stopped reading Sci-Am 6 or 8 years ago, because I thought (and still think) the publishersy purposely avoid mention of LENR. However, some unknown person or commercial entity recently sent me a subscription, which I have not yet canceled. Bob Cook From: H LV Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 7:47 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core Possible generation of heat from nuclear fusion in Earth’s inner core http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37740 <> Harry
RE: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries
Higgins is correct IMHO. The heart battery charger should utilize existing or
slightly modified NMR machines to focus an oscillating magnetic field on an
internal permanent magnet oscillator which can move within a conductor and
create an internal source of current. Forget about using RF penetrating EM
radiation.
Regarding Robin’s observation, cardiologists may not like such a long life
device since it would reduce the market supply of people needing periodic
operations. Opposing this rationale I have heard the idea that getting inside
the chest and checking the equipment out results in more reliable performance.
The same argument (get inside to check things out ½ way through reactor life)
was used for naval nuclear reactors early on. I just read recently that the
Navy brass is changing that design philosophy to produce reactors that will go
the life of a ship—40-50 years—after nearly 65 years of reactor design and
operating experience. I doubt that the rest of the ship will last that long
without overhaul or al least major changes in weapons.
I think that the old design advice, “if the wheel works don’t fix it,” is
probably ok for naval reactor design.
As to David’s comments about nuclear waste, I agree that the expense is high
and the safety of storage is high and the safety is unconsciously poor in many
cases. The best solution IMHO is storage in Yucca Mountain in self-shielded
ductile iron casks of about 100 tons that will fit on special rail cars for
transport to Yucca Mt.
As LENR gets a foot hold in the world’s energy production, those old die-hards,
who want the eventual use of Pu-239 and other hard to handle isotopes, will be
gone. Yucca Mountain can be closed up along with the other nuclear test holes
and mountain test sites nearby. The one problem with this solution is that
intrusion by future non-technical people would be easy, if institutional
government controls fail in the future. However, this issue is no different
than the same institutional control problem associated with hazardous waste
disposal sites containing heavy metals and organic waste, both a major concern
to health and safety of future, non-technical generations and the environment.
Bob Cook
.
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 6:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries
This is possible, but it would require a close coupling via low frequency
magnetic fields. Think of it as a hockey puck placed over the pacemaker
implant area for a period of hours. The human body is well modeled as a
container of salt water. In fact, when we were creating RF models of the human
body, the dummy was nicknamed, "Salty". The water is a highly ionic, highly
conductive, high dielectric (Er~80) fluid. This causes a skin impedance that
is highly reflective of RF - most of the EM fields are substantially reflected.
Magnetic fields will penetrate, but propagating EM fields have a fixed ratio
of electric/magnetic field intensity given by the free space impedance of 277
ohms. Near field evanescent fields close to the source may have a different
ratio, allowing the magnetic field intensity to be higher which will penetrate
into the body (the hockey puck radiator).
Most of the local AC fields are E-fields and these are highly reflected by the
body's conductive nature and do not penetrate.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:11 PM, wrote:
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:41:32 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I have often wondered why pacemakers can't have a built in transformer secondary
and rectifier so that all one has to do a be adjacent to the primary for a while
in order to recharge the internal battery ("air" core transformer). Perhaps they
could even be powered by the stray AC fields in your average dwelling?
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
RE: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?
Brian— With all due respect, there IS Rossi IP. It was identified in the Rossi/IH contract in an Appendix—very specific. I read it all. It was generally referred to as E-Cat IP and specified in several different documents, including the E-Cat US patent as I recall. It did not include much technical information about Pd and D reactions and reactors, which may cause it to be worthless SOUR GRAPES in some people’s estimation. If it were worthless as you indicate, it certainly has spurred a lot of Ni-H LENR technology and LENR+ development (as Peter Gluck so consistently identifies) to produce investment in R&D around the World. I admit that I am frequently confused, but not about Rossi’s alleged fraudulent life. My main confusion is trying to understand the motives of people who attempt to discredit Rossi’s work. I am concluding after following the treatment of P&F in 1989 and thereafter that some of the same motives that drove the discrediting of P&F are pertinent to deciding how Rossi should be handled. In a political realm I consider such motives would be labeled conservative and in opposition to progressive peoples’ motives. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:25 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR? There is no IP!!! Every time you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent life, you get confused. Rossi has absolutely nothing. I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing hands. There is potential for a huge fish fry, however. Bob Cook
FW: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries
Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: bobcook39...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:37 PM To: Brian Ahern Subject: RE: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries Each nano diamond would have a small resistance from the beta generation locations to the surface of the particle. Disperse the diamond powder in a copper lattice, pressure bond, and, bingo, you have a low resistance source of electrons. The mean free path of a C-14 beat is probably mico-meters compared to nano-meters for the diamond particles. The beta (charge) would be captured in the copper. Put a diode on one end of the copper and you may get a nice battery. The device being made from by-produce materials from reactor ops would be subject to regulation by the NRC. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Brian Ahern Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:17 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; Jones Beene Subject: Re: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries Not so fast! The kow work function is great for cold cathode emission. However the very high reesistivity prevents useful operation. From: Jones Beene Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:43 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries This is really just the natural progression of betavoltaics, incorporating "nano". The niche has been around for many years as it is almost obvious... remember Paul Brown and before?... Several of those betavoltaic proponents used to post here (Brown passed away in 2001). The tech was always just out of reach in terms of cost and energy density. Nano-diamond changes everything. Its low work function means high efficiency and cold cathodes. The problem will always be cost but mass production of the material for micro-electronics could change that. Intel needs a new breakthrough. Where are you Intel? We need you. On Monday, November 28, 2016 11:17 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: That's fantastic. If it works, it will be as good as cold fusion for small scale devices such as hearing aids. I wonder if it can be powerful enough for a cell phone? - Jed
[Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?
With the recent information from Italy (Giuseppe, Navarro and Coppi) reported on Rossi’s blog; the information from LENR Forum about Gates interaction with La Gatta (apparently in Padua, It during the ICCF-19); Texas Tech interaction with La Gatta’s firm in Italy; La Gatta’s interaction with IH in N.C., and Gates support of LENR at Texas Tech, is Gates involved in IH via. La Gatta’s firm or Texas Tech or both? The plot thickens. And the Court Case may reveal much more about the IH supporters and action to control the Ni-H LENR technology. I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing hands. There is potential for a huge fish fry, however. Bob Cook
