Re: [Vo]:Defkalion
Robert, Well known. See Santilli. See how neutrons kept the Tarpon Springs facility evacuated even days after complete shut down. See the reactor that caused the scare in on of Chan's links (http://hydride.has.it/). Get serious and do a little digging. It really is exciting! Stay away from knowledge thieves such as comic books or SciFi. Robots, Face Book, Rockets, Psychology, and other pseudo science areas are wasting time and effort for those who experiment, calculate or theorize in the Physics Universe. :-) Robert Leguillon wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding So, arcing in a hydrogen environment produces monoatomic hydrogen from diatomic hydrogen, eh? From: jth...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:29:59 +0800 Seems to me that Woomera (Who appears to be an actual eyewitness) is confirming for us the presence, importance and use of the 2 spark plugs. Page 16 does show 2 orange wires that appear to be spark plug cables. (Off-the-shelf Spark Plug cables do have brightly colored red or orange insulations. And the picture do show a cable that is about the right diameter size for a spark plug cable.) I know I am harping on this spark plug thing, but the sooner "replicators" get over this doubt, the sooner we can focus on the corect replication design. It does appear the evidence for sparks being integral to the process is mounting. Those who doubt the use of sparks do bring up a good point, sparks will cook and melt the nickel nanostructures. Hence, the point that I keep on repeating, Sparks PLUS turbulence is the answer. As I mentioned before, Rossi redesigned his reactor from a small cylindrical design (original ECat and the EKitten design) to a flat "fat cat" design. The reason for this, IMO, is to design a reactor that would be more efficient with sparks delivery. This allowed him to controll his reaction better as DGT seems to have found out - that is, control the reaction rate with the apllication and modulation of sparks. Jojo - Original Message - From: Fang Sen To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:55 PM Subject: [Vo]:Defkalion Enlightenment: " The reactor I saw is shown on Defkalion's website G'Day, I wanted to point out some of the items that I saw are now being shown on Defkalion's website: The room is the same room as I visited. http://www.defkalion-energy.com/files/2012-05_StatusPicturesFinal.pdf On page one, the 3rd picturefrom the left, in the middle is agraph of temperature. Note the cross hatching. This is fusion taking placeusing two items depicted on page 13 14. This cross hatchingdepicts a VERY high temperature. Just look at page 5 at the 'box' It's got hardly anything connected to it. Hydrogen,two wires and a themocouple. The test reactor I saw running is on page 23 24. It only had a hydrogen line at 1bar connected along with two wires. These wires were connected to an item shown on page 13 14 in the VERYcenter of the picture. I'll leave it to you to find the item.They arenot connected.They areVERYimportant. Heck there's one just sitting on the table on page 18. in the rignt handpicture. Page 24 is just as I saw it. Note the items on each side of the reactor vessel. Page 16 actually shows the wire that should be connected and isn't. There should be two of them. That same item on pages 13, 14 is also sticking out of the box. This test reactor was SO simple. What is being shown now,is a plethora of thermo couples to closely measure the reactor's temperature in various placeswithin the reactor.This means, to me, that they are trying to optimise the reactor and possible internal design changes. These themocouples are positionedwhere the fluid would flow through the reactor. Regards, Woomera "
Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant
Frank, First, for the sake of clarity, a hydrogen atom stripped of electrons is a proton, has a +1 charge and can be called a hydrogen ion or better a hydrogen cation. A proton with one electron can be called a hydrogen atom with no charge and can be considered to be in an unstable exited state, readily able to combine with an identical twin sister to yield H2 molecule plus energy. A proton with 2electrons called a hydride ion has a -1 charge and is classed as an anion. The 2 electrons fit into what some people call the S shell. All atoms in motion have a natural propensity to cool or lose energy by emitting radiation if surrounded by matter at a lower temperature. The radiation is called electromagnetic and is described by the term photon at times. The photons emitted usually are not evenly distributed as far as wave lengths being more characteristic of system circumstances. Statistical Mechanics and Statistical Thermodynamics are the bases of my ability to understand modern trends of out of the box suggestions here, having taught both. Carbon nano structures usually can be thought of as polymers of a simple benzene ring configuration yielding planar, spherical, cup, cone, tube and etc. geometric formats. I say this for clarity and pray the the colleagues here pin down what they are discussing, thus avoiding much of the back and forth explanations. Now, it was reported here at one point that plasma within a hydrocarbon atmosphere does yield generous quantities of nano carbon cones containing protons. I prefer to refer to this system as a method of trapping and containing protons by way of nano technology stabilization. Love your comments, keep them coming and intrigued by your theories, especially Znidarsic's constant. Regards, Intensity fznidar...@aol.com wrote: The hydrogen must be in themono atomicform and stripped of its electrons. H2absorberssuch as carbon nano tubes do not appear to work. Frank z -Original Message- From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sat, Apr 21, 2012 3:25 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:09 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: As far as Jones comment as finally..Its is finally not.. this was done 15 years ago. Jones did ask a good question of why hydrogen in nickle and whydeuteriumin palladium. It must have something to do with aresonantconditionat that speed. Helium in another metal may work at a different pressure and frequency. I am trying this trying to achieve another result. I was wondering about dissociation. Can anyone clarify -- will hydrogen dissociate in any metal that is acting as a cathode, e.g., Pd, or will it only dissociate in a metal with a crystallinestructure of a small enough size? Eric
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Green Technologies Communicates With Interested Parties
After viewing the lightning, back to: Ni + H H From: 1. Pressure tank 2. Metal Hydride via heat decomposition 3. Plasma arc decomposition of Hydrocarbon (See: http://www.google.com/url?sa=trct=jq=kvaerner%20carbon%20black%20%26%20hydrogen%20processsource=webcd=6ved=0CD8QFjAFurl=""> and http://www.complexphysics.org/Projects/Nanocarbon.html ) 3. Appears to represent electronic control capability and safety compliance. Easily placed in a sealed cartridge with insulated electrical conductor access. Plasma trigger anyone? Akira Shirakawa wrote: Snip Powder (cartridge format) will be sold as a component to each Hyperion unit. Snip
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation
Lou, Show this to one of your non degree tech guys working at your transducer based instrument factory shop in N. J. : http://www.icpig2009.unam.mx/pdf/PB13-3.pdf He could assemble it in an hour. Use Ar instead of He. Next day check for He. Surprise! The C deposit is conical nano structure and has a trapped H within. No need to check for excess heat. Where there is He there is Rossi Fusion. The ECat appropriated Chan one Hydride mix and must be changed every six months because of He build up. His attempt to get patents on Hydride fusion ran into prior pending obstacles. Hence the rush to cheap mass production. Warm Regards, Reliable pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Abd, I intend to do some more research on this - plasmonics is pretty dicey. I'm not sure whether a nanowire has a cross-section large enough to scatter gammas originating at any significant distance, thoug, unless they are extremely collimated. But, I am more optimistic than you are that W-L would pass this test. According to the calculations in the paper I cited, the enormous effective (not relativistic) mass of those electrons make each look like a subatomic battering ram to any particle unfortunate enough to collide with one. I will try to find a local college with appropriate lab resources. There's a slim chance I can get it done. Probably expensive. Too bad I lost the lottery. Lou Pagnucco Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 03:29 PM 4/5/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Abd, Regarding the absence of gammas - ... is it reasonable to suppose that a high energy gamma would experience many (anomalously high) dissipative Compton collisions before escaping as a less energetic photon? If this is plausible, could we confirm it, by embedding a few radioactive gamma sources inside nanowires and observing whether gammas are attenuated and/or directionally scattered during current flow? Gamma sources could be placed so that gammas pass through the supposedly active heavy electron patches, and, if W-L theory is real, drastic attenuation should be seen. That attentuation should not be seen with controls. W-L theory requires 100% absorption of the gamma energies that would be generated from neutron absorption, so this should not be difficult to detect. Since Larsen patented this, it's really on him to demonstrate it. I'm not about to try setting up some complex experiment just to prove a wild theory wrong. Now, if I had a reason to believe W-L theory, if I were a proponent of it, then, sure, the experiment would be very much in order. Widom and Larsen are raising a highly unlikely theory *without any experimental evidence specifically supporting it.* If they published a gamma screen paper, with sufficient detail for replication, and showing their own results, *then* we'd see some movement on this. Until then, it's fancy pie in the sky. That wouldn't prove W-L theory, but a successful prediction is golden for moving ahead with new science.
Re: [Vo]:Stimulation of LENR using dual lasers, creative engineering needed
Abd, See cheap = Chan. Why did so many ridicule Propane over Ar? Maybe that was key to his success. See http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextpid=S0103-97332004000800032 Hydrocarbon + Ni in arc = C2H2 + H (highly active) and now C2H2 + Ni = unexplained temperature results. I decided to duplicate Te Chung. Found that long stem spark plugs NGK LZTR5AGP3381 fit nicely in 3/8 iron T using a Thread Insert OEM 25648 FIX-A-THREAD Hey Guys, how about some suggestive help. How many plugs? Do I use Model T Ford coils, old CRT TV HV power supply, Teslar Coil, Medical RFG used to fuse back nerves, RFG generator used for bench testing, .. to energize the plugs . what? And how about the Ni? I remember a comment last year in some blog where a Bloke observed thousands of tiny sparks on a marble floor which had coin Ni dust on it and spill residue of floor cleaner after lights off to close for the night. Do I use a plate heat exchanger as a reaction vessel? Do I dump in some Mg, Fe, Cu, or a metal hydride with the Ni? Not to worry yourselves. Have a concrete slab on isolated property and plenty of blocks to enclose the devise. Hey, this Stimulation of LENR is almost more fun than sex and less expensive. Warm Regards, Reliable Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 09:30 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: The idea was doing something cheap, right? Yes. Cheap carbon dioxide laser? If we could get direct stimulation in the range of 8 - 22 ThZ, great! That would replace the two visible light lasers. However, I'm not clear if the far infrared would penetrate the windows and electrolyte. 2012/4/5 mailto:fznidar...@aol.comfznidar...@aol.com Why not use a carbon dioxide laser? At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: The problem would be the output. The low energy tail would have also a very low power. I think a specialized equipment for that band is required...
Re: [Vo]:Robot aircar taxies and ground taxies would provide another degree of freedom
Jed, What you really should try is my time machine. Yes, I programmed my computer to go back in time. Links to OTR. There used to be a blast from the past by a Bloke named Jed from Georgia. He must have moved on. Try my time machine: http://lin2.ash.fast-serv.com:9022/listen.pls I virtually tour past, present and future all over the world. That avoids inevitable travel frustrations. Pick up or annually rent a tin roof shack on a deserted beach in PR at $100/mo. Land of no rules or regulations but part of the USA. Build whatever you want wherever you want P.S. Orlando to Ponce $59. Fillet mignon import from Honduras $1/lb in P.R. Sea full of lobsters, wild coconuts all over and a cool trade wind. Easy living. Warm Regards, Reliable Jed Rothwell wrote: In the thread about airplanes that convert to cars,Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote: It's another degree of freedom. For those of us who are private pilots, we have a tremendous range of territory at our finger tips. We can fly 1,000 miles for a weekend trip, but many airports don't have rental cars readily available, and the terms of the lease are such that it's impractical to rent a car for a short period of time. I see your point. Okay, let us think about how this might work in the future with a combination of fully automatic taxis, both VTOL air cars and ground automobiles. These would not be air cars that transition to ground vehicles. They would be two separate vehicles, both designed for the purpose. Assume that air cars go about as fast as today's Cirrus aircraft, 400 km/h. While you're at it, assume they have built-in parachutes for the entire aircraft, like the Cirrus. We are talking about the distant future. The vehicles are completely automated. Parents think nothing of sending a six-year-old child up in one by herself. You could send one empty with no one on board carrying a package, or send one empty a hundred kilometers to some isolated place to pick up your Aunt Minnie. Assume that ground vehicles go up to290 km/h in tunnels, or on surface roads at 30 km/h. I am talking about conditions starting 50 to 100 years from now, continuing for the next 300 years or so.I can't begin to predict the shape of technology thousands of years in the future. That's futile. I do not postulate anything we have not already discovered. Nothing like anti-gravity. Let us stick to wheeled vehicles, maglev, and aircraft that the Wright brothers would understand, plus -- of course -- advanced robotics and cold fusion. Suppose I am in Atlanta Georgia and I have business in Emmitsburg MD, 950 km north. Assume that people do not allow private air cars to land just anywhere, because they are disruptive. They make a lot of noise and wind and they kill wildlife. Assume they can only land at designated locations such as shopping malls that offer air service. Emmitsburg is a small town. You sometimes see crop dusting helicopters in the fields today. Naturally they have helicopter ambulances. But I do not think people would want small VTOL aircraft taking off and landing in the surrounding area on a regular basis. In this scenario, I drive a short distance to some local mall that offers air taxi service. I take an air taxi to Gettysburg, PA. in about 2 hours, 20 minutes. An automated ground taxi is waiting for me there. There are probably no taxis available in Gettysburg today, but there will be in the future because many elderly people in that area who do not get out often will not want to bother owning an automobiles. As I said, you will have the option to call a robot taxi that comes to your door in 15 min. which you can use all day if you like. These vehicles will be cheaper in any town will have a few of them available any time. Even people who own their own cars will want a few of them within 30 minutes in case their car needs repair, or friends relatives come from out of town and everyone wants to go out somewhere, or in case you buy a bunch of furniture and you need the equivalent of a pickup truck. The cars resemble today's Zipcar more than a taxi -- the difference being you don't have to drive. Even if you are blind you can go anywhere you like by yourself. North of Gettysburg there our many Amish people who prefer not
Re: [Vo]:Ang.: [Vo]:Rydberg matter and the leptonic monopol
mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:19:42 +0800: Hi, [snip] 2. I don't believe bulk heating the powder is the best way to create Rydberg matter. Bulk Heating it would tend to concentrate too much heat on certain portions of the clump and possibly melt it. At the least, the heat would probably sinter the nickel powder and destroy all active nano sites. Someone correct me, but if I remeber correctly, Nickel atom migration and the start of the sintering process begins to occur at around 500C. Clearly, with bulk heating, you can not prevent heating a few protions of that the nickel powder clump to 500C. The goal is to ionize the powder and hydrogen to create Rydberg matter, not heat it and sinter it and melt it with bulk heating. If the Hydrogen is injected through a very small hole, then the gas jet can be directed at the Ni powder on the bottom (after passing it through the arc of embedded spark plug powered by continuous pulses from a buzz box), puffing it up, resulting in constant mixing, and ensuring that the temperature of both gas and powder are constant. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:The Aspden Effect
Terry, FYI: Within your ref: That quantum jitter, by the way, is the so-called 'Zitterbewegung' that underlies Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty in quantum theory, by which neither position nor momentum are certain, but multiply the two together and you get a definite quantum of angular momentum h/2π, where h is Planck's constant of action. I have good reason to believe that matter acquires that jitter property by sharing it with a universal activity in the aether itself, or the 'vacuum medium' should the word 'aether' seem inappopriate terminology to a physicist who may read this. See explaination in Guglinski's book Quantum Ring Theorey, 2006. Warm Regards, Reality Terry Blanton wrote: This is worth repeating from years ago: http://www.haroldaspden.com/lectures/30.htm T
