Extra heat in the form of thermal pulse might disrupt a resonance that was
enabling the production excess heat.
Harry
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:56 PM, David L Babcock wrote:
> Apparently there's two threads of thought here:
>
> a: Apply heat to make the process start, and more heat to take it to a
> higher cop. Stop the heat (or increase cooling) to bring the process back
> from cascade and ruin. This one seems to describe what Rossi has, and what
> Dave Roberson is modeling, and makes a lot of sense to me.
>
> b: Apply heat to make it stop. May involve recalescence. Confusing.
> Would seem to be inherently stable, no? (If it gets too hot, it slows
> itself down.) Interesting, but doesn't seem to apply to Rossi's rig.
>
> Anybody wish to clarify?
>
> Ol' Bab
>
>
>
> On 6/1/2013 10:39 AM, Vorl Bek wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:28:03 -0400
> Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
>
> Vorl Bek wrote:
>
>
>
> No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense.
>
>
> Why is this nonsense?
>
> I don't have the eloquence to explain, but if you ask over atmoletrap.co.uk,
> or wavewatching.net/fringe, they can clear it up
> for you.
>
>
>
>
>
