Apparently there's two threads of thought here:
a: Apply heat to make the process start, and more heat to take it to a
higher cop. Stop the heat (or increase cooling) to bring the process
back from cascade and ruin. This one seems to describe what Rossi has,
and what Dave Roberson is modeling, and makes a lot of sense to me.
b: Apply heat to make it stop. May involve recalescence. Confusing.
Would seem to be inherently stable, no? (If it gets too hot, it slows
itself down.)Interesting, but doesn't seem to apply to Rossi's rig.
Anybody wish to clarify?
Ol' Bab
On 6/1/2013 10:39 AM, Vorl Bek wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:28:03 -0400
Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Vorl Bek <vorl....@antichef.com> wrote:
No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense.
Why is this nonsense?
I don't have the eloquence to explain, but if you ask over at
moletrap.co.uk, or wavewatching.net/fringe, they can clear it up
for you.
