Extra heat in the form of thermal pulse might disrupt a resonance that was enabling the production excess heat.
Harry On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:56 PM, David L Babcock <ol...@rochester.rr.com>wrote: > Apparently there's two threads of thought here: > > a: Apply heat to make the process start, and more heat to take it to a > higher cop. Stop the heat (or increase cooling) to bring the process back > from cascade and ruin. This one seems to describe what Rossi has, and what > Dave Roberson is modeling, and makes a lot of sense to me. > > b: Apply heat to make it stop. May involve recalescence. Confusing. > Would seem to be inherently stable, no? (If it gets too hot, it slows > itself down.) Interesting, but doesn't seem to apply to Rossi's rig. > > Anybody wish to clarify? > > Ol' Bab > > > > On 6/1/2013 10:39 AM, Vorl Bek wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:28:03 -0400 > Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Vorl Bek <vorl....@antichef.com> <vorl....@antichef.com> wrote: > > > > No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense. > > > Why is this nonsense? > > I don't have the eloquence to explain, but if you ask over atmoletrap.co.uk, > or wavewatching.net/fringe, they can clear it up > for you. > > > > >
