[Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Daniel Rocha
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewhttp://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285
topic.php?f=4t=285http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285

The technological breakthrough of LENR (or CANR) is no longer speculation.
It is a fact that will eventually change the world’s energy problems and its
sociopolitical divides through cheap, clean and green energy. The world
needs LENR as a new energy source. Although change will not happen
over-night, LENR will help reduce CO2 emissions, lower the cost of energy,
and provide longevity to our planet’s energy needs.

Defkalion sees its role with responsibility and asks the community at large
to continue its support.

Defkalion has:
• Enhanced technology and engineering on Rossi’s invention or similar
inventions
• Prepared business models for international expansion
• Established a strong network of global contacts
• Prepared legislative and certification procedures
• Ensured national, regional and international network in politics and
business
• Prepared global financing

Defkalion has worked in close partnership with Andrea Rossi for a very long
time to prepare a commercially viable and industrially applicable product
using his invention. Defkalion invested a lot of money to evolve Rossi’s
E-Cat lab prototype into its Hyperion product. Defkalion is now at the stage
where its industrial prototype is ready for production.

Defkalion has held direct business discussions with 62 interested companies
who visited our offices in Greece and witnessed our work. Small industry and
large energy players internationally were all impressed by our progress in
technology and engineering. More are still coming. Despite this phenomenal
progress, Defkalion never made promises.
Our aim has always been to inform and demonstrate to public our progress
when the final product is ready for use, thereby avoiding any speculations.

Today, Hyperion engineering has completed version 7. We were surprised to
see our old designs used in public testing. We were confused why our old
designs were implemented wrongly, as well as witnessing insufficient use of
instruments and testing protocols. We also identified confidential (yet
shown in public) special instruments designed in collaboration with Rossi
and prepared by Defkalion. These actions have already paved the way for more
negative criticism (unworthy) against the inventor, which do not give
credibility to his important work.

The plethora of positive and negative comments is not helpful, as pointed
out recently on the Vortex mail archive:
(http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@es ...
52357.htmlhttp://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg52357.html
).

Defkalion fully supports and endorses this technology. Our mission is to
introduce this technology on a global scale, responsibly. To date, we have
self-financed all RD and business development phases without asking for a
single penny from anyone (private or public). We will soon be ready to
announce the results of our extensive RD with Hyperion final products.

Athens, October 10th, 2011
*Defkalion GT S.A.*


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Craig Haynie
Deflalion indicates that they are ready for production.

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285 

And it sounds like Rossi was using an older Defkalion design:

Today, Hyperion engineering has completed version 7. We were surprised
to see our old designs used in public testing. We were confused why our
old designs were implemented wrongly, as well as witnessing insufficient
use of instruments and testing protocols. We also identified
confidential (yet shown in public) special instruments designed in
collaboration with Rossi and prepared by Defkalion. These actions have
already paved the way for more negative criticism (unworthy) against the
inventor, which do not give credibility to his important work. 

The plethora of positive and negative comments is not helpful, as
pointed out recently on the Vortex mail archive:
(http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@es ... 52357.html). 

Could that 'confidential special instrument' be the frequency generator?
Didn't Rossi bring it out only when he wasn't seeing an 'ignition'.

Craig





Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2011-10-10 16:02, Daniel Rocha wrote:

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/view
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285topic.php?f=4t=285
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285


It would be interesting to read Rossi's comments on this.
Maybe it's not necessary, but please somebody forward this announcement 
to him.


Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Andrea Selva
Another pot of snakes ?

2011/10/10 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com

 On 2011-10-10 16:02, Daniel Rocha wrote:

 http://www.defkalion-energy.**com/forum/viewhttp://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/view
 http://www.defkalion-energy.**com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=**285http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285
 topic.php?f=4t=285
 http://www.defkalion-energy.**com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=**285http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285
 


 It would be interesting to read Rossi's comments on this.
 Maybe it's not necessary, but please somebody forward this announcement to
 him.

 Cheers,
 S.A.




Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Defkkalion, of particular interest:

 Today, Hyperion engineering has completed version 7.
 We were surprised to see our old designs used in public testing.
 We were confused why our old designs were implemented wrongly,
 as well as witnessing insufficient use of instruments and
 testing protocols. We also identified confidential (yet shown
 in public) special instruments designed in collaboration with
 Rossi and prepared by Defkalion. These actions have already
 paved the way for more negative criticism (unworthy) against
 the inventor, which do not give credibility to his important work.

Holy Matzo-Balls! What a mouth-full of carefully crafted diplomacy.

Looks to me as if Defkalion is trying it's best to remain diplomatic
and respectful to the interests of the original parties while at the
same time making it very clear to all potential investors that their
own engineering efforts have now exceeded the inventor's specs by
several generations. So, hurry, hurry, hurry on up to the podium and
plunk your money down. Time's-a-waisting!

As has been speculated here before, it should not be considered a
surprise that Rossi's original work could soon be improved upon,
particularly when you get a lot more engineers together working on the
project. But of course the fruits of Defkalion's alleged improvements
(Version 7) has yet to demonstrated out in public. Perhaps by the
end of October?

This could get interesting. Well... I sure hope it gets interesting soon.

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



RE: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie 

 Defkalion: We also identified confidential (yet shown in public) special 
 instruments designed in collaboration with Rossi and prepared by Defkalion. 

 CH: Could that 'confidential special instrument' be the frequency generator?
Didn't Rossi bring it out only when he wasn't seeing an 'ignition'.

Thanks for posting this. For those who may be wondering what this instrument 
really is, look at the low current draw. This can point to a high voltage, low 
current device. Of course, it could also point to a dedicated frequency 
generator as well, but I doubt seriously if that is what it is.

My guess is that the mystery box could be a neon light type of transformer, or 
else another kind of HV device like a small Tesla coil (air core).

As to 'why' high voltage could help with nickel nanopowder, specifically, we 
are back to the issue of isotope enrichment. 

I should mention the Barker patents in the context of a particular Nickel 
isotope - Ni-64. He is an old post on the Barker patents:

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg17550.html

Here is my take on Ni-64:

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg39326.html

Ok - the first objection (to my suggestion that what we are seeing is the 
high-voltage enhanced decay of an unusual isotope) is that Ni-64 is technically 
a stable isotope, and the element nickel is the second most stable element. 

But the answer to that objection is that Ni-64 is unlike the other isotopes of 
nickel, and could be the most unstable of all stable isotopes in the periodic 
table - in terms of its mass deviation as a percentage of the mass of the most 
stable isotope of that particular element. 

Sorry for the confusing wording, but this is not an easy concept to verbalize 
in a short posting.

Second objection - assumed high cost. Many of us have noted, myself included, 
that despite Rossi having said in the past that he is enriching the nickel 
powder with a particular (unidentified) isotope - it seemed that the cost of 
doing this would be excessive. Most enriched isotopes are extremely expensive.

Having checked with suppliers, I now stand corrected on that point. As it turns 
out, Ni-64 enrichment is available at a cost which is not cheap, but is at 
least a factor of 20 times less than expected ... for whatever reason. This 
could relate to the source of the nickel.

Conclusion: The new advance here, which was apparently instigated by Defkalion 
and could have been based on the Barker patents - and then picked up by Rossi, 
is the use of a high voltage low current power supply. This voltage input 
somehow stimulates the decay of Ni-64, in the way that Barker was able to do 
with pitchblende (an increased decay rate of 10^6) possibly to Cu-64 which is 
itself unstable and there could be some kind of see-saw instability. 

Note: of course this is not standard physics, so yes... if it is accurate or 
even close to what is happening, then it is new physics in two different ways 
(or more) - but rather close to what is expected of similar isotopes. Nickel is 
known to favor beta decay for some reason. 

Obviously, if the device works at all it is new physics so the only question 
for us moving forward to a more complete understanding is: how deep is this 
rabbit hole (and/or did you take the red pill?)

Jones

Morpheus: You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and 
believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill ... 




RE: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
DGT wrote:
We were surprised to see our old designs used in public testing.

and

We also identified confidential (yet shown in public) special instruments 
designed in collaboration with Rossi and prepared by Defkalion.

I feel a lawsuit coming on!

-mark




Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Mark:

 DGT wrote:
 We were surprised to see our old designs used in public testing.

 and

 We also identified confidential (yet shown in public) special instruments 
 designed in collaboration with Rossi and prepared by Defkalion.

 I feel a lawsuit coming on!

Yeah, perhaps so.

Personally, I interpret the statements as an attempt by DGT to issue a
friendly suggestion to Rossi that he ought to back off. ... IOW,
there will be plenty of pie for everyone, so quit yer'bellyaching.
Trust us

Yeah, right. ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Robert Lynn
More like a gun to the head - ie we think we can extract legal
remedies for your revelation of our confidential materials unless you
come to an agreement with us, (and we know you are running out of
money and time while we can pay for lots of lawyers that will waste
all of your time), but let's just keep it friendly for now.  There
will have been non disclosure agreements and contracts stating who
owned what.

On 10 October 2011 17:16, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
 From Mark:

 DGT wrote:
 We were surprised to see our old designs used in public testing.

 and

 We also identified confidential (yet shown in public) special instruments 
 designed in collaboration with Rossi and prepared by Defkalion.

 I feel a lawsuit coming on!

 Yeah, perhaps so.

 Personally, I interpret the statements as an attempt by DGT to issue a
 friendly suggestion to Rossi that he ought to back off. ... IOW,
 there will be plenty of pie for everyone, so quit yer'bellyaching.
 Trust us

 Yeah, right. ;-)

 Regards
 Steven Vincent Johnson
 www.OrionWorks.com
 www.zazzle.com/orionworks





Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Robert:

 More like a gun to the head - ie we think we can extract
 legal remedies for your revelation of our confidential
 materials unless you come to an agreement with us, (and
 we know you are running out of money and time while we can
 pay for lots of lawyers that will waste all of your time),
 but let's just keep it friendly for now.  There will have
 been non disclosure agreements and contracts stating who
 owned what.

I tend to agree,

...As Teddy once sed:

Speak softly and carry a big stick.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/speak-softly-and-carry-a-big-stick.html

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Terry Blanton
Sure looks like they are saying that Rossi has stolen their design
with his eLion.

T



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Peter Heckert

Am 10.10.2011 18:50, schrieb Terry Blanton:

Sure looks like they are saying that Rossi has stolen their design
with his eLion.
Hard to imagine, because Professor Stremmenos (vice president and chief 
scientist @ Defkalion) was present and smiling.




Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Daniel Rocha
The question was not posted, but I guess he is calling of clowns the people
of Defkalion:

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=20#comment-94489

Dear Martin:
These are just clowns.
No other comment is opportune.
I want not to dirt this blog with that shit. My attorneys are taking care of
them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.


2011/10/10 Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de

 Am 10.10.2011 18:50, schrieb Terry Blanton:

  Sure looks like they are saying that Rossi has stolen their design
 with his eLion.

 Hard to imagine, because Professor Stremmenos (vice president and chief
 scientist @ Defkalion) was present and smiling.




Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Daniel Rocha
Interesting! He deleted the message!

2011/10/10 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com

 The question was not posted, but I guess he is calling of clowns the people
 of Defkalion:

 http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=20#comment-94489

 Dear Martin:
 These are just clowns.
 No other comment is opportune.
 I want not to dirt this blog with that shit. My attorneys are taking care
 of them.
 Warm Regards,
 A.R.


 2011/10/10 Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de

 Am 10.10.2011 18:50, schrieb Terry Blanton:

  Sure looks like they are saying that Rossi has stolen their design
 with his eLion.

 Hard to imagine, because Professor Stremmenos (vice president and chief
 scientist @ Defkalion) was present and smiling.





Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
That is hilarious.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Interesting! He deleted the message!

He said 'shit'.  His mom probably made him erase it and eat soap.

T



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10 -- Only 1 eCat

2011-10-10 Thread Alan J Fletcher
1. For the 6 Oct test, only one of the three modules in the E-Cat was 
active. Oct 6 for the test, only one of the three modules in the 
E-Cat was active. By what means were the other two made inoperative? 
By what means-Were the other two made inoperative? They don't seem to 
have separate heaters or hydrogen inputs. They Do not Seem to have 
separate heaters or hydrogen inputs. Was the nickel powder left out 
of them? The nickel powder was left out of them?


AR:  1 - only one reactor has-been inserted in the wafer 



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2011-10-10 19:43, Daniel Rocha wrote:

Interesting! He deleted the message!


Unfortunately I think it's too late now for him. The message has been 
already cited in several forums and blogs. Also, people with RSS feeds 
should still have it in their email clients.


Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Jed Rothwell

OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:


Looks to me as if Defkalion is trying it's best to remain diplomatic
and respectful to the interests of the original parties while at the
same time making it very clear to all potential investors that their
own engineering efforts have now exceeded the inventor's specs by
several generations.


Yup. That's how I read it.

It doesn't cost anything to remain diplomatic. In business it is usually 
best to be as diplomatic as you can bring yourself to be.


I think the people at Defkalion are sincerely respectful of Rossi, as am 
I. He is a genius. He invented this device. He deserves barrels of money 
and a dozen Nobel prizes for it. Unfortunately he is not very good at 
doing demonstrations.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

2011-10-10 Thread Daniel Rocha



 I think the people at Defkalion are sincerely respectful of Rossi, as am I.
 He is a genius. He invented this device. He deserves barrels of money and a
 dozen Nobel prizes for it. Unfortunately he is not very good at doing
 demonstrations.

 - Jed


I am not sure if that is an irony or not...


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10 -- Only 1 eCat

2011-10-10 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 10-10-2011 19:56, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
1. For the 6 Oct test, only one of the three modules in the E-Cat was 
active. Oct 6 for the test, only one of the three modules in the E-Cat 
was active. By what means were the other two made inoperative? By what 
means-Were the other two made inoperative? They don't seem to have 
separate heaters or hydrogen inputs. They Do not Seem to have separate 
heaters or hydrogen inputs. Was the nickel powder left out of them? 
The nickel powder was left out of them?


AR:  1 - only one reactor has-been inserted in the wafer


It looks to me Rossi refers to the box as a wafer and not as what is 
common in wafer production to silicon wafers.


Kind regards,

MoB



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10 -- Only 1 eCat

2011-10-10 Thread Alan J Fletcher

At 11:33 AM 10/10/2011, Man on Bridges wrote:

AR:  1 - only one reactor has-been inserted in the wafer
It looks to me Rossi refers to the box as a wafer and not as what is 
common in wafer production to silicon wafers.


Nor its religious (catholic, at least) use.

Anyway, a single eCat means .



... more room for mice 



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10 -- Only 1 eCat

2011-10-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:


 It looks to me Rossi refers to the box as a wafer and not as what is common
 in wafer production to silicon wafers.


I thought he meant that crinkly heat exchanger-like thing.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10 -- Only 1 eCat

2011-10-10 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 10-10-2011 21:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:

Nor its religious (catholic, at least) use.


Yeah, I know; it's a long time ago I had one of these.


Anyway, a single eCat means .

... more room for mice 


And you know what they say about cat and mice:
NL: Als de kat van huis is dansen de muizen op tafel ;-)

It seems, this translates fairly well in many languages.
EN / US: when the cat's away the mice will play
IT: quando il gatto non c'è, i topi ballano
DE: Ist die Katze aus dem Haus, tanzen die Mäuse auf dem Tisch
SE: När katten är borta, dansar råttorna på bordet
RO: Când pisica nu-i acasă, joacă şoarecii pe masă

And especially for the Mexicans:
¡Andale! ¡Andale! ¡Arriba! ¡Arriba! ¡Yii-hah!, Hola, uno pussy gato. tú 
tienes uno problemente? ;-)


Kind regards,

MoB