[Vo]:The function of the substrate

2015-10-14 Thread Axil Axil
One of the major functions that LENR must fulfill is the reception,
concentration, and amplification of energy from the external environment
and the conversion of that power into magnetism. That external energy is
light in one form or another.

In LENR engineering, the structure that first captures the light energy is
the lattice substrate. Without this substrate, LENR does not happen unless
the source of light is very powerful. Three examples of this substrate and
their associated systems are as follows: In the Rossi’s E-Cat, the Lattice
is the 100 micron nickel particle that Rossi produces in fuel
preprocessing. This particle is an antenna that optimally receives infrared
light(heat) and converts this light energy into dipole motion. This
electron motion produces an alternating current at high frequency.

The next example is Holmlid’s iridium powder holder that holds iron oxide
potassium particles. This metal lattice optimally absorbs light in the
green-blue to UV range. This lattice will also convert this high frequency
light into alternating current.
The structure that converts and amplifies this alternating current into
magnetism is nano particles of hydrogen, potassium, or lithium. This
rydberg matter are nanowires that only allows this alternating current to
flow in one direction. This EMF power can only collect into balls of power.
These particles also mix electrons and light photons together to form
polaritons. At the tips of the nanowires and the points of were they touch
each other, vortexes of polaritons form these rings of EMF are call
solitons of polaritons (SPP). It is these rings of EMF energy that store
large amounts of power and produce magnetic beams that cause the LENR
effect. They are black holes of EMF where energy goes in but does not come
out.

Another antenna method that seems to work is the metal foam powder holders
that DGT came up with. This network of fine nickel wires acts like a
backplane that caries the received EMF produced by the spark that DGT used
to pump EMF power into the 5 micron nickel particles. DGT also produced
rydberg matter which generated the SPPs.

Without the lattice that receives and directs the EMF into the nanopowder,
a powerful light source such as a laser will be powerful enough to produce
LENR in just nanopowder alone.
This particular behavior was observed in experiments where a laser
irradiated gold nanopowder dissolved in water. The uranium and thorium
salts that was dissolved in that water underwent a fission reaction. This
says that muons where produced to canalize fission instead of neutrons.

On the other hand, Holmlid does not need a laser to produce muons because
the iridium powder holder is an antenna that is sensitive enough to receive
and concentrate light from his lab’s florescent lights. But the gold powder
which does not have a lattice substrate to help it, would not react to
generate muons using just room lighting; these nanoparticles require a
powerful light source like a laser to produce the magnetic power strong
enough to generate muons.


Re: [Vo]:The function of the substrate

2015-10-14 Thread Lennart Thornros
Hello Axil,
I admit I do not understand much of the nuclear theories.
However, I think I have somewhat of an understanding of what you say about
the substrate and how it is sensitive to a certain frequency.
I have asked before; why is there not a million replication of the Holmlid
set up?
It seems very straight forward or is there something I miss?? Something,
which prevent good experimenters to replicate his experiment.

Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros

www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648

“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment
to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> One of the major functions that LENR must fulfill is the reception,
> concentration, and amplification of energy from the external environment
> and the conversion of that power into magnetism. That external energy is
> light in one form or another.
>
> In LENR engineering, the structure that first captures the light energy is
> the lattice substrate. Without this substrate, LENR does not happen unless
> the source of light is very powerful. Three examples of this substrate and
> their associated systems are as follows: In the Rossi’s E-Cat, the Lattice
> is the 100 micron nickel particle that Rossi produces in fuel
> preprocessing. This particle is an antenna that optimally receives infrared
> light(heat) and converts this light energy into dipole motion. This
> electron motion produces an alternating current at high frequency.
>
> The next example is Holmlid’s iridium powder holder that holds iron oxide
> potassium particles. This metal lattice optimally absorbs light in the
> green-blue to UV range. This lattice will also convert this high frequency
> light into alternating current.
> The structure that converts and amplifies this alternating current into
> magnetism is nano particles of hydrogen, potassium, or lithium. This
> rydberg matter are nanowires that only allows this alternating current to
> flow in one direction. This EMF power can only collect into balls of power.
> These particles also mix electrons and light photons together to form
> polaritons. At the tips of the nanowires and the points of were they touch
> each other, vortexes of polaritons form these rings of EMF are call
> solitons of polaritons (SPP). It is these rings of EMF energy that store
> large amounts of power and produce magnetic beams that cause the LENR
> effect. They are black holes of EMF where energy goes in but does not come
> out.
>
> Another antenna method that seems to work is the metal foam powder holders
> that DGT came up with. This network of fine nickel wires acts like a
> backplane that caries the received EMF produced by the spark that DGT used
> to pump EMF power into the 5 micron nickel particles. DGT also produced
> rydberg matter which generated the SPPs.
>
> Without the lattice that receives and directs the EMF into the nanopowder,
> a powerful light source such as a laser will be powerful enough to produce
> LENR in just nanopowder alone.
> This particular behavior was observed in experiments where a laser
> irradiated gold nanopowder dissolved in water. The uranium and thorium
> salts that was dissolved in that water underwent a fission reaction. This
> says that muons where produced to canalize fission instead of neutrons.
>
> On the other hand, Holmlid does not need a laser to produce muons because
> the iridium powder holder is an antenna that is sensitive enough to receive
> and concentrate light from his lab’s florescent lights. But the gold powder
> which does not have a lattice substrate to help it, would not react to
> generate muons using just room lighting; these nanoparticles require a
> powerful light source like a laser to produce the magnetic power strong
> enough to generate muons.
>
>


Re: [Vo]:The function of the substrate

2015-10-14 Thread Eric Walker
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

Without the lattice that receives and directs the EMF into the nanopowder,
> a powerful light source such as a laser will be powerful enough to produce
> LENR in just nanopowder alone.
> This particular behavior was observed in experiments where a laser
> irradiated gold nanopowder dissolved in water. The uranium and thorium
> salts that was dissolved in that water underwent a fission reaction. This
> says that muons where produced to canalize fission instead of neutrons.
>

Here I think you're referring to this study [1], which you've referred to
several times in the past [e.g., 2] (please correct me if I have the wrong
study).  I didn't appreciate this paper until now.  The authors present an
interesting set of experimental results, in which, at face value, the decay
of thorium and its daughters was induced.  They think it might have
occurred through focusing of the laser that was used.

Another possibility is that it was induced by electron screening decreasing
the Coulomb barrier width to alpha decay, and by increased electron
presence in the nucleus, thereby increasing the electron capture and beta
decay rates.  Here are some relevant reactions of these kinds:

% python scripts/reactions.py "Hg,Ta,Au,Th" --ascii --model induced-decay
e- + 227Th => e- + 4He + 223Ra + 6147 keV   ->A, A, trace
e- + 228Th => e- + 4He + 224Ra + 5520 keV   ->A, A, trace
e- + 229Th => e- + 4He + 225Ra + 5168 keV   ->B-, A, trace
e- + 230Th => e- + 4He + 226Ra + 4770 keV   ->A, A, trace
e- + 231Th => e- + 4He + 227Ra + 4213 keV   ->B-, A
e- + 232Th => e- + 4He + 228Ra + 4082 keV   ->B-, A, trace
e- + 234Th => e- + 4He + 230Ra + 3673 keV   ->B-, A
e- + 180Ta => e- + 4He + 176Lu + 2098 keV   ->B-, A, in nature
e- + 196Hg => e- + 4He + 192Pt + 2040 keV   A, in nature
e- + 181Ta => e- + 4He + 177Lu + 1519 keV   ->B-, A
e- + 198Hg => e- + 4He + 194Pt + 1383 keV   A, in nature
e- + 197Au => e- + 4He + 193Ir + 972 keVA, in nature
e- + 180Ta => e- + neutrino + 180Hf + 921 keV
e- + 199Hg => e- + 4He + 195Pt + 825 keVA, in nature
e- + 180Ta => e- + neutrino + 180W + 778 keV->A
e- + 200Hg => e- + 4He + 196Pt + 718 keVA, in nature
e- + 231Th => e- + neutrino + 231Pa + 391 keV   ->A
e- + 201Hg => e- + 4He + 197Pt + 334 keV->B-, A
e- + 234Th => e- + neutrino + 234Pa + 274 keV   ->B-, ->SF, trace
e- + 202Hg => e- + 4He + 198Pt + 135 keVA, in nature


Note the presence of gold among the parents.

They saw increased gamma activity.  Perhaps this activity went back to the
daughters of beta decay reactions being populated in excited states.  They
saw a hydrogen isotope effect, where irradiation under D2O resulted in
decreased gamma activity while H2O did not.  I have no idea what this would
come from.  (Note that this is different than saying that fewer decays took
place; perhaps more were to the ground state when D2O was used.)

What would cause increased electron presence in the nucleus?  Perhaps the
excitation of orbital electrons to s-shells by the laser frequency.
Electrons in s-shells don't have a node in the nucleus and hence spend a
portion of their time there.

Eric



[1] http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg104837.html