Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-11 Thread mixent
In reply to  Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 09 May 2011 19:42:20 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while it 
was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a resistive 
heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket. The SS is a 
jacket not a reactor!  See  patent  drawing Jed just uploaded :
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf

I mentioned to him in private email that I thought that this would invalidate
his patent if the Ni was really contained in SS, and his reply was that he
didn't try to teach his patent Attorneys their business.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-10 Thread francis
Akira, I think  6 in your dwg http://i.imgur.com/QOLXZ.png

 might be a temp sensor .

 

Some questions:

 

1.  Since it appears Rossi went from a cu reactor in the patent  to a SS
reactor presently shown in the photos can we make the assumption that both
work in the same capacity when the inner surface is coated with nickel? 

2.  When the patent refers to the reactor being filled with powder is it
all in the form of a coating or otherwise packed against the heat sink of
the inner walls? The questions regarding operating temp seem to suggest any
loose powder just filling the void would clump together near melting temp.

3.  The patent doesn't say what metal the heater is made of but I would
guess tungsten since hydrogen and tungsten are best known To initiate the
anomaly since Langmuir 

Regards

Fran

 

Akira Shirakawa
Mon, 09 May 2011 17:32:32 -0700

I've made this annotated image for clarity:
http://i.imgur.com/QOLXZ.png
 
What is 6 ?
 

 



[Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Roarty, Francis X
So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while it 
was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a resistive 
heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket. The SS is a 
jacket not a reactor!  See  patent  drawing Jed just uploaded :
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf



Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Axil Axil
here is where the nickel powder coat is discribed:


*[0056] *Nickel is coated in a copper tube 100, including a heating electric
resistance *101, *adjusted and controlled by a controlling thermostat (not
shown) adapted to switch off said resistance *101 *as nickel is activated by
hydrogen contained in a bottle *107.*


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
 wrote:

 So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while
 it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a
 resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket.
 The SS is a jacket not a reactor!  See  patent  drawing Jed just uploaded :

 http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf

 http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf





Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 10-5-2011 1:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:


So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor 
while it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder 
and a resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a 
SS jacket. The SS is a jacket not a reactor!



I think you are wrong.
First there is the inner SS chamber with one opening at the top where H2 
and Ni can be added.
Second there is the copper vessel around it were the cold water flows in 
and steam flows out through the chimney.
Third there is the SS clamp to hold the external heater very close 
against the copper vessel.


Looking once again at the photos one can only say these are very cheap 
parts which are usually used for plumbing and for Central Heating, with 
probably the only exception of the inner SS chamber, which is possibly 
milled by a computer-driven workbench.


This is what I see in the drawings from the 22passi blog AND the photos 
taken during the tests with KE.


Kind regards,

MoB






Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2011-05-10 01:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:

So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor
while it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and
a resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS
jacket. The SS is a jacket not a reactor! See patent  drawing Jed just
uploaded :

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf


I've made this annotated image for clarity:
http://i.imgur.com/QOLXZ.png

What is 6 ?

Cheers,
S.A.



RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Thanks Akira,
I was going back and forth between the patent and the drawing - Nice 
job.
Best Regards
Fran

-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 8:30 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

On 2011-05-10 01:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
 So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor
 while it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and
 a resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS
 jacket. The SS is a jacket not a reactor! See patent  drawing Jed just
 uploaded :

 http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf

I've made this annotated image for clarity:
http://i.imgur.com/QOLXZ.png

What is 6 ?

Cheers,
S.A.



RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Roarty, Francis X
MoB,
I also though the reactor was stainless Steele until I saw the 
new patents from Italy and US.
Regards
Fran

From: Man on Bridges [mailto:manonbrid...@aim.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 8:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

Hi,

On 10-5-2011 1:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while it 
was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a resistive 
heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket. The SS is a 
jacket not a reactor!
I think you are wrong.
First there is the inner SS chamber with one opening at the top where H2 and Ni 
can be added.
Second there is the copper vessel around it were the cold water flows in and 
steam flows out through the chimney.
Third there is the SS clamp to hold the external heater very close against the 
copper vessel.

Looking once again at the photos one can only say these are very cheap parts 
which are usually used for plumbing and for Central Heating, with probably the 
only exception of the inner SS chamber, which is possibly milled by a 
computer-driven workbench.

This is what I see in the drawings from the 22passi blog AND the photos taken 
during the tests with KE.

Kind regards,

MoB





Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 10-5-2011 2:30, Akira Shirakawa wrote:

On 2011-05-10 01:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:

So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor
while it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and
a resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS
jacket. The SS is a jacket not a reactor! See patent  drawing Jed just
uploaded :

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf


I've made this annotated image for clarity:
http://i.imgur.com/QOLXZ.png
Nice explanatory drawing, which seems to be in sync with the US 
patent-request, but is NOT in sync with the photos taken during the KE 
test.

The SS clamp is NOT leaktight so no water is flowing at the inside of it.
Besides it is a dedicated clamp for adding a heater to a pipe, according 
one of the photos in the KE report it reads 230 V 50Hz.


Kind regards,

MoB



Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Axil Axil
The large amount of  iron(10%) found in Rossi ash is proof that the nickel
powder is in contract with stainless steel.

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
 wrote:

 MoB,

 I also though the reactor was stainless Steele until I saw
 the new patents from Italy and US.

 Regards

 Fran



 *From:* Man on Bridges [mailto:manonbrid...@aim.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2011 8:22 PM

 *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not
 Stainless steele



 Hi,


 On 10-5-2011 1:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:

 So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while
 it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a
 resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket.
 The SS is a jacket not a reactor!

 I think you are wrong.
 First there is the inner SS chamber with one opening at the top where H2
 and Ni can be added.
 Second there is the copper vessel around it were the cold water flows in
 and steam flows out through the chimney.
 Third there is the SS clamp to hold the external heater very close against
 the copper vessel.

 Looking once again at the photos one can only say these are very cheap
 parts which are usually used for plumbing and for Central Heating, with
 probably the only exception of the inner SS chamber, which is possibly
 milled by a computer-driven workbench.

 This is what I see in the drawings from the 22passi blog AND the photos
 taken during the tests with KE.

 Kind regards,

 MoB






Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Harry Veeder
Fran,

The new US patent is really an old patent.

The contents of the Italian patent that was just granted have not been seen by 
anyone.

Harry

 


From: Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 8:56:21 PM
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless 
steele


MoB,
    I also though the reactor was stainless Steele until I saw the 
new patents from Italy and US.
Regards
Fran
 
From:Man on Bridges [mailto:manonbrid...@aim.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 8:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless 
steele
 
Hi,

On 10-5-2011 1:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote: 
So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while it 
was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a resistive 
heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket. The SS is a 
jacket not a reactor! 

I think you are wrong.
First there is the inner SS chamber with one opening at the top where H2 and 
Ni 
can be added.
Second there is the copper vessel around it were the cold water flows in and 
steam flows out through the chimney.
Third there is the SS clamp to hold the external heater very close against the 
copper vessel.

Looking once again at the photos one can only say these are very cheap parts 
which are usually used for plumbing and for Central Heating, with probably the 
only exception of the inner SS chamber, which is possibly milled by a 
computer-driven workbench.

This is what I see in the drawings from the 22passi blog AND the photos taken 
during the tests with KE.

Kind regards,

MoB





Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele

2011-05-09 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:

 What is 6 ?

I think that is Ni plating on the reactor surface.

T