Fran, The "new US patent" is really an old patent.
The contents of the Italian patent that was just granted have not been seen by anyone. Harry > >From: "Roarty, Francis X" <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> >To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 8:56:21 PM >Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless >steele > > >MoB, > I also though the reactor was stainless Steele until I saw the >new patents from Italy and US. >Regards >Fran > >From:Man on Bridges [mailto:manonbrid...@aim.com] >Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 8:22 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:cu pipe is sealed inner reactor not Stainless steele > >Hi, > >On 10-5-2011 1:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote: >So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while it >was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a resistive >heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket. The SS is a >jacket not a reactor! > >I think you are wrong. >First there is the inner SS chamber with one opening at the top where H2 and >Ni >can be added. >Second there is the copper vessel around it were the cold water flows in and >steam flows out through the chimney. >Third there is the SS clamp to hold the external heater very close against the >copper vessel. > >Looking once again at the photos one can only say these are very cheap parts >which are usually used for plumbing and for Central Heating, with probably the >only exception of the inner SS chamber, which is possibly milled by a >computer-driven workbench. > >This is what I see in the drawings from the 22passi blog AND the photos taken >during the tests with K&E. > >Kind regards, > >MoB > > > >
