Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Terry Blanton]

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Bob Higgins  wrote:

> Piantelli doesn't say that the hydrogen enters as a shrunken state, because
> he doesn't have evidence of that.

Isn't it simple enough to look for the signature UV radiation of an
inverse Rydberg transition?

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Bob Higgins]

I don't believe Dr. Piantelli proposes Rydberg states of hydrogen - he
proposes BEC-like effects across a small crystallite on the surface of the
Ni.  Such BEC-like effects may not be a sustained manifestation, but
perhaps only a transient one.  For example, at some temperatures the grains
may be in one crystallographic phase and a transient temperature or shock
could cause them to transition to another crystallographic phase.  During
this transient, perhaps a BEC-like effect occurs, and this is where
Piantelli believes a hydrogen anion is sucked from the surface into the
crystallite.  He goes on to say the evidence suggests that the hydrogen
anion enters a Ni atom in place of an electron.  To do so, it seems likely
(to me) that an f/H- must occur, with the energy extracted into the entire
crystallite as a transient BEC.  [To wit, I invite the investigation of
thermal waves in metals - an obscure technology that may be relevant.]

Piantelli doesn't say that the hydrogen enters as a shrunken state, because
he doesn't have evidence of that.  However, his evidence is that the
hydrogen anion enters the Ni atom and closely approaches the nucleus.  I
(not him) surmise that the anion must be shrunken for that to occur, but he
doesn't say so because he has no evidence for it.  It is not for issues of
possible patent infringement - he is simply too honest for that ploy.

I trust Piantelli's identification of a proton coming from his extracted
fuel he measured in a cloud chamber.  The positive charge can easily be
identified in an applied magnetic field and Piantelli is ultra-qualified to
make such a determination.

Piantelli invented Ni-H LENR, has reactors working for years, has run many
experiments to explore what works and what doesn't, WHY they work, and what
are the characteristics of operation.  By comparison, the rest of us are
all speculating hacks.

Bob Higgins

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> Ø  Piantelli believes Rydberg matter to be part of his theory of how Ni-H
> works - wherein the surface grains each become a BEC –
>
>
>
> Bob - Piantelli seems to be asking for way too many miracles. No
> experiment has ever demonstrated bosonic hydrogen at even room temperature,
> or anything higher than a few degrees K.
>
>
>
> Ultracold is required for hydrogen condensates, but in contrast – “dense
> hydrogen” by any name - does not need to be a condensate. Since it is
> fractional, it is not necessary to be in the same quantum state as its
> neighbors.
>
>
>
> There is an obvious motivation for Piantelli and others to fail to mention
> any kind of fractional hydrogen state - due to the large IP portfolio of
> BLP. And by claiming the BEC state, which he cannot demonstrate, Piantelli
> has reduced the value of his IP to practically nothing.
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

More...

http://www2.chem.gu.se/~holmlid/

Ultra-dense deuterium was recently shown to be the first room-temperature
superfluid, see Ref. 196 below. It also shows a Meissner effect at room
temperature (Ref. 204) and is thus probably also superconductive at room
temperature.



On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> According to Lief Holmlid hydrogen Rydberg matter is a superconductor at
> room temperature, This includes the meissner effect.
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:
>
>> *From:* Bob Higgins
>>
>>
>>
>> Ø  Piantelli believes Rydberg matter to be part of his theory of how
>> Ni-H works - wherein the surface grains each become a BEC –
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob - Piantelli seems to be asking for way too many miracles. No
>> experiment has ever demonstrated bosonic hydrogen at even room temperature,
>> or anything higher than a few degrees K.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ultracold is required for hydrogen condensates, but in contrast – “dense
>> hydrogen” by any name - does not need to be a condensate. Since it is
>> fractional, it is not necessary to be in the same quantum state as its
>> neighbors.
>>
>>
>>
>> There is an obvious motivation for Piantelli and others to fail to
>> mention any kind of fractional hydrogen state - due to the large IP
>> portfolio of BLP. And by claiming the BEC state, which he cannot
>> demonstrate, Piantelli has reduced the value of his IP to practically
>> nothing.
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

According to Lief Holmlid hydrogen Rydberg matter is a superconductor at
room temperature, This includes the meissner effect.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> Ø  Piantelli believes Rydberg matter to be part of his theory of how Ni-H
> works - wherein the surface grains each become a BEC –
>
>
>
> Bob - Piantelli seems to be asking for way too many miracles. No
> experiment has ever demonstrated bosonic hydrogen at even room temperature,
> or anything higher than a few degrees K.
>
>
>
> Ultracold is required for hydrogen condensates, but in contrast – “dense
> hydrogen” by any name - does not need to be a condensate. Since it is
> fractional, it is not necessary to be in the same quantum state as its
> neighbors.
>
>
>
> There is an obvious motivation for Piantelli and others to fail to mention
> any kind of fractional hydrogen state - due to the large IP portfolio of
> BLP. And by claiming the BEC state, which he cannot demonstrate, Piantelli
> has reduced the value of his IP to practically nothing.
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Jones Beene]

From: Bob Higgins 

 

Ø  Piantelli believes Rydberg matter to be part of his theory of how Ni-H works 
- wherein the surface grains each become a BEC – 

 

Bob - Piantelli seems to be asking for way too many miracles. No experiment has 
ever demonstrated bosonic hydrogen at even room temperature, or anything higher 
than a few degrees K. 

 

Ultracold is required for hydrogen condensates, but in contrast – “dense 
hydrogen” by any name - does not need to be a condensate. Since it is 
fractional, it is not necessary to be in the same quantum state as its 
neighbors. 

 

There is an obvious motivation for Piantelli and others to fail to mention any 
kind of fractional hydrogen state - due to the large IP portfolio of BLP. And 
by claiming the BEC state, which he cannot demonstrate, Piantelli has reduced 
the value of his IP to practically nothing.

 

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

http://www.gizmag.com/high-temperature-superconductor-aluminum/36317/

ow the USC team led by professor Vitaly Kresin has discovered hints of yet
another family of superconductors which work at relatively high
temperatures. Specifically, they found out that while single atoms of
aluminum only turn superconductive at very low temperatures (around 1 K),
so-called "superatoms" (clusters of evenly spaced atoms that behave as a
single atom) of aluminum turn superconductive at much higher temperatures,
around 100 K.

Superconductivity takes place when so-called Cooper pairs
 form within a material. These
are pairs of electrons that are very faintly attracted to each other and
activate a mechanism whereby the electrons don’t veer off course, and
therefore lose heat, whenever they bump into an imperfection within the
material. Because the attractive force between the electrons, which happens
only under certain conditions, is so weak (two electrons would normally
repel each other), even a small amount of external energy (which could be
given off in the form of heat) can upset this equilibrium. This is why
superconductors only work at very low temperatures.

Kresin and team built a series of aluminum superatoms between 32 and 95
atoms large. For superatoms containing 37, 44, 66 and 68 aluminum atoms,
the scientists found evidence that Cooper pairings were taking place,
turning the material into a superconductor.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Bob Higgins 
wrote:

> Note:  Most of the references for Rydberg matter and LENR are not
> referring to f/H or IRH - they are referring to large ensembles of atoms in
> a BEC that can behave in a single quantum state.  Piantelli believes
> Rydberg matter to be part of his theory of how Ni-H works - wherein the
> surface grains each become a BEC - even if only short-lived - and the
> grains must be properly sized for BEC formation.
>
> I am not saying that f/H or IRH or hydrino are not involved in LENR, only
> that these are rare references in most of the LENR literature.
>
> Bob Higgins
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:
>
>> *From:* Axil
>>
>> Ø  … Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium can
>> because the valance electron configuration between the aluminum compound
>> and the potassium is the same.
>>
>> It is fair to assume that in all of our discussions about “dense
>> hydrogen” where the electron is in a stable redundant ground state – that
>> all of the various terms given to the species are more-or-less synonymous,
>> including: hydrino, f/H (fractional hydrogen), IRH (inverted Rydberg
>> hydrogen), DDL (deep Dirac level), pychno-hydrogen, femtohydrogen, virtual
>> neutron, Dark Matter hydrogen, metallic hydrogen, sub-orbital hydrogen… and
>> probably a few others.
>>
>

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Bob Higgins]

Note:  Most of the references for Rydberg matter and LENR are not referring
to f/H or IRH - they are referring to large ensembles of atoms in a BEC
that can behave in a single quantum state.  Piantelli believes Rydberg
matter to be part of his theory of how Ni-H works - wherein the surface
grains each become a BEC - even if only short-lived - and the grains must
be properly sized for BEC formation.

I am not saying that f/H or IRH or hydrino are not involved in LENR, only
that these are rare references in most of the LENR literature.

Bob Higgins

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> *From:* Axil
>
> Ø  … Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium can
> because the valance electron configuration between the aluminum compound
> and the potassium is the same.
>
> It is fair to assume that in all of our discussions about “dense hydrogen”
> where the electron is in a stable redundant ground state – that all of the
> various terms given to the species are more-or-less synonymous, including:
> hydrino, f/H (fractional hydrogen), IRH (inverted Rydberg hydrogen), DDL
> (deep Dirac level), pychno-hydrogen, femtohydrogen, virtual neutron, Dark
> Matter hydrogen, metallic hydrogen, sub-orbital hydrogen… and probably a
> few others.
>

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

http://www.news.vcu.edu/article/Protecting_Groups_Go_Rogue_in_Aluminum_Superatoms

“This work offers new intuition on what criteria allow the formation of
stable clusters, and how to induce these clusters into becoming effective
catalysts,” said Khanna.

Chemistry works at a higher level than the atom. Stable clusters of atoms
act as if they were new elements. This chemical property of atomic clusters
involve how electrons flow around the cluster of atoms.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> If the key to LENR activity is the configuration of valance electrons in a
> chemical compound, then a single ion of silicon oxide may be just as good
> as potassium or lithium as a LENR catalyst.
>
> The goal of LENR based chemistry might be to find what configuration of
> valance electrons work and how to create that configuration. Maybe this is
> what Mills has been doing all this years.
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:
>
>> *From:* Axil
>>
>> Ø
>>
>> Ø  … Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium can
>> because the valance electron configuration between the aluminum compound
>> and the potassium is the same.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is fair to assume that in all of our discussions about “dense
>> hydrogen” where the electron is in a stable redundant ground state – that
>> all of the various terms given to the species are more-or-less synonymous,
>> including: hydrino, f/H (fractional hydrogen), IRH (inverted Rydberg
>> hydrogen), DDL (deep Dirac level), pychno-hydrogen, femtohydrogen, virtual
>> neutron, Dark Matter hydrogen, metallic hydrogen, sub-orbital hydrogen… and
>> probably a few others.
>>
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, Mills does not agree with this assessment, which makes it all the
>> more important – since the species would fall outside his IP unless he can
>> realistically distinguish it. Notably AlO is not even listed by Mills as
>> catalytic.
>>
>>
>>
>> There are many implications – should it be proved that AlO is a catalyst
>> for forming f/H - including in the geology of earth. Since aluminum is the
>> second most abundant element in the mantle of earth (as Al2O3) and oxygen
>> is first - we could assume that there is constant formation of f/H from
>> organic material – which then can migrate to the core of earth – or on
>> occasion migrate to the surface, over geologic time.
>>
>>
>>
>> The mining of f/H is not out of the question – should we learn where to
>> look for it and how to retain it. Perhaps some nickel has natural,
>> primordial levels of f/H (ppm quantity) - which does not show up in
>> chemical analysis and survives refining.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

If the key to LENR activity is the configuration of valance electrons in a
chemical compound, then a single ion of silicon oxide may be just as good
as potassium or lithium as a LENR catalyst.

The goal of LENR based chemistry might be to find what configuration of
valance electrons work and how to create that configuration. Maybe this is
what Mills has been doing all this years.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> *From:* Axil
>
> Ø
>
> Ø  … Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium can
> because the valance electron configuration between the aluminum compound
> and the potassium is the same.
>
>
>
> It is fair to assume that in all of our discussions about “dense hydrogen”
> where the electron is in a stable redundant ground state – that all of the
> various terms given to the species are more-or-less synonymous, including:
> hydrino, f/H (fractional hydrogen), IRH (inverted Rydberg hydrogen), DDL
> (deep Dirac level), pychno-hydrogen, femtohydrogen, virtual neutron, Dark
> Matter hydrogen, metallic hydrogen, sub-orbital hydrogen… and probably a
> few others.
>
>
>
> AFAIK, Mills does not agree with this assessment, which makes it all the
> more important – since the species would fall outside his IP unless he can
> realistically distinguish it. Notably AlO is not even listed by Mills as
> catalytic.
>
>
>
> There are many implications – should it be proved that AlO is a catalyst
> for forming f/H - including in the geology of earth. Since aluminum is the
> second most abundant element in the mantle of earth (as Al2O3) and oxygen
> is first - we could assume that there is constant formation of f/H from
> organic material – which then can migrate to the core of earth – or on
> occasion migrate to the surface, over geologic time.
>
>
>
> The mining of f/H is not out of the question – should we learn where to
> look for it and how to retain it. Perhaps some nickel has natural,
> primordial levels of f/H (ppm quantity) - which does not show up in
> chemical analysis and survives refining.
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Jones Beene]

From: Axil 

Ø 

Ø  … Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium can because 
the valance electron configuration between the aluminum compound and the 
potassium is the same. 

 

It is fair to assume that in all of our discussions about “dense hydrogen” 
where the electron is in a stable redundant ground state – that all of the 
various terms given to the species are more-or-less synonymous, including: 
hydrino, f/H (fractional hydrogen), IRH (inverted Rydberg hydrogen), DDL (deep 
Dirac level), pychno-hydrogen, femtohydrogen, virtual neutron, Dark Matter 
hydrogen, metallic hydrogen, sub-orbital hydrogen… and probably a few others.

 

AFAIK, Mills does not agree with this assessment, which makes it all the more 
important – since the species would fall outside his IP unless he can 
realistically distinguish it. Notably AlO is not even listed by Mills as 
catalytic.

 

There are many implications – should it be proved that AlO is a catalyst for 
forming f/H - including in the geology of earth. Since aluminum is the second 
most abundant element in the mantle of earth (as Al2O3) and oxygen is first - 
we could assume that there is constant formation of f/H from organic material – 
which then can migrate to the core of earth – or on occasion migrate to the 
surface, over geologic time. 

 

The mining of f/H is not out of the question – should we learn where to look 
for it and how to retain it. Perhaps some nickel has natural, primordial levels 
of f/H (ppm quantity) - which does not show up in chemical analysis and 
survives refining.

 

 

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

Rydberg matter may be a key to exiting earth orbit, rapid transit to Mars,
colonization of Mars, exploring the outer planets and the kuiper belt
objects and eventually to enbling interstellar flight. The new developments
in Q thrusters where an EMF source generates a push on realized virtual
particles  provides momentum in the opposite direction.

See

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wokn7crjBbA

Dr. Harold "Sonny" White - Eagleworks Laboratories: Advanced Space
Propulsion

Rydberg matter produces mesons, muons, and eventually electrons from the
vacuum. These negitively charged particles could be accelerated to provide
thrust by pushing against the vacuum. When properly engineered, a LENR
based rocket thruster based on rydberg matter would provide a nulear
powered permanent and constant thrust that might when held long enough to
eventually get a hydrogen powered spacecraft close to light speed.

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3082.pdf

Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space (2012)
Advanced Propulsion Physics: Harnessing the Quantum Vacuum.

Can the properties of the quantum vacuum be used to propel a spacecraft?
The idea of pushing off the vacuum is not new, in fact the idea of a
“quantum ramjet drive” was proposed by Arthur C. Clark (proposer of
geosynchronous communications satellites in 1945) in the book Songs of
Distant Earth in 1985: “If vacuum fluctuations can be harnessed for
propulsion by anyone besides science fiction writers, the purely
engineering problems of interstellar flight would be solved.”

It is our responsibility to get the dreams of Mr. Clarke to come true.



On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> The formation of rydberg matter is a chemically formulated nano particle
> based process. Any alkali metal including hydrogen can form rydberg matter.
> For example, lithium can form rydberg matter jut like hydrogen can.
>
>
> In addition, one alkali element can force the formation of rydberg matter
> in another alkali element. The valance electrons are the active agent in
> rydberg matter formation, not the isotopic structure of the nucleus.
> Deuterium and/or H1 and any isotopic mixture can form Rydberg matter
> equally well,
>
> Fro example, Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium
> can because the valance electron configuration between the aluminum
> compound and the potassium is the same. This variability in chemistry is
> what makes LENR so confusing. Many differing things can act in the same
> important chemically related ways .
>
> See superatoms
>
> http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> The world’s foremost expert on Rydberg matter is Lief Holmlid. He is a
>> top ranked professional scientist but like other world class
>> scientists(Nobel laureate Brian Josephson in quantum physics, Nobel
>> laureate Julian Schwinger in field theory physics) his life's work spinning
>> many years is largely ignored since Rydberg matter is a pivotal component
>> of hydrogen based LENR.
>>
>> Lief Holmlid has discovered the production of many billions of
>> deuterium/deuterium fusion events activated by a single laser shot that
>> excites a potassium based catalyst that produces Rydberg hydrogen matter.
>>
>> Holmlid has also detected the production of an array of subatomic
>> particles including muons that emanate from Rydberg hydrogen matter when it
>> is exposed to excitation by both laser and ordinary room lighting. This
>> experimental observation provides an alternative explanation to replace low
>> energy neutron production theory for the generation of the LENR fusion
>> reaction.
>>
>> In a recent experiment, Holhlid detected a huge flux of high energy
>> neutral particles that were produced by the laser induced DD fusion
>> reaction. These particles were determined experimentally to be fragments of
>> the Rydberg hydrogen matter that carry away the kinetic energy produced by
>> DD fusion.
>>
>> The Holhlid DD fusion experiment is an alternative explanation and a
>> replacement for the ultra low energy postulate that is the central LENR
>> mechanism in W-L theory.
>>
>> Furthermore in the context of exploding wires, Ken Shoulders identified
>> both a Bright Mode and a Dark Mode EV that is produced by the formation
>> through condinsation of metal plasma excited by the heat of the electric
>> arc explosion. As a result of recent Nanoplasmonic research, these EVs are
>> more properly interpreted as Dark and Bright Mode surface plasmon
>> polaritons(SPP). The SPP is always produced by Nanoplasmonic reactions
>> involving nanoparticles such as those formed through Rydberg Matter
>> production.
>>
>> Lewis Larsen co-father of the W-L theory should look closely at the
>> experiments of Lief Holhlid and adjust his theory accordingly. As explained
>> here previously, the weak force cannot produce neutrons as postulated by
>> W-L theory. As a valid alternative, muon p

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

The formation of rydberg matter is a chemically formulated nano particle
based process. Any alkali metal including hydrogen can form rydberg matter.
For example, lithium can form rydberg matter jut like hydrogen can.


In addition, one alkali element can force the formation of rydberg matter
in another alkali element. The valance electrons are the active agent in
rydberg matter formation, not the isotopic structure of the nucleus.
Deuterium and/or H1 and any isotopic mixture can form Rydberg matter
equally well,

Fro example, Aluminum monoxide can form rydberg matter just like potassium
can because the valance electron configuration between the aluminum
compound and the potassium is the same. This variability in chemistry is
what makes LENR so confusing. Many differing things can act in the same
important chemically related ways .

See superatoms

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> The world’s foremost expert on Rydberg matter is Lief Holmlid. He is a top
> ranked professional scientist but like other world class scientists(Nobel
> laureate Brian Josephson in quantum physics, Nobel laureate Julian
> Schwinger in field theory physics) his life's work spinning many years is
> largely ignored since Rydberg matter is a pivotal component of hydrogen
> based LENR.
>
> Lief Holmlid has discovered the production of many billions of
> deuterium/deuterium fusion events activated by a single laser shot that
> excites a potassium based catalyst that produces Rydberg hydrogen matter.
>
> Holmlid has also detected the production of an array of subatomic
> particles including muons that emanate from Rydberg hydrogen matter when it
> is exposed to excitation by both laser and ordinary room lighting. This
> experimental observation provides an alternative explanation to replace low
> energy neutron production theory for the generation of the LENR fusion
> reaction.
>
> In a recent experiment, Holhlid detected a huge flux of high energy
> neutral particles that were produced by the laser induced DD fusion
> reaction. These particles were determined experimentally to be fragments of
> the Rydberg hydrogen matter that carry away the kinetic energy produced by
> DD fusion.
>
> The Holhlid DD fusion experiment is an alternative explanation and a
> replacement for the ultra low energy postulate that is the central LENR
> mechanism in W-L theory.
>
> Furthermore in the context of exploding wires, Ken Shoulders identified
> both a Bright Mode and a Dark Mode EV that is produced by the formation
> through condinsation of metal plasma excited by the heat of the electric
> arc explosion. As a result of recent Nanoplasmonic research, these EVs are
> more properly interpreted as Dark and Bright Mode surface plasmon
> polaritons(SPP). The SPP is always produced by Nanoplasmonic reactions
> involving nanoparticles such as those formed through Rydberg Matter
> production.
>
> Lewis Larsen co-father of the W-L theory should look closely at the
> experiments of Lief Holhlid and adjust his theory accordingly. As explained
> here previously, the weak force cannot produce neutrons as postulated by
> W-L theory. As a valid alternative, muon production is currently an
> experimentally verified mechanism that could produce muon catalyzed DD
> fusion.
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Peter Gluck 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/09/sep-052015-redefining-misinformation-in.html
>>
>> that's all!
>>
>> Peter
>> --
>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>> Cluj, Romania
>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Axil Axil]

The world’s foremost expert on Rydberg matter is Lief Holmlid. He is a top
ranked professional scientist but like other world class scientists(Nobel
laureate Brian Josephson in quantum physics, Nobel laureate Julian
Schwinger in field theory physics) his life's work spinning many years is
largely ignored since Rydberg matter is a pivotal component of hydrogen
based LENR.

Lief Holmlid has discovered the production of many billions of
deuterium/deuterium fusion events activated by a single laser shot that
excites a potassium based catalyst that produces Rydberg hydrogen matter.

Holmlid has also detected the production of an array of subatomic particles
including muons that emanate from Rydberg hydrogen matter when it is
exposed to excitation by both laser and ordinary room lighting. This
experimental observation provides an alternative explanation to replace low
energy neutron production theory for the generation of the LENR fusion
reaction.

In a recent experiment, Holhlid detected a huge flux of high energy neutral
particles that were produced by the laser induced DD fusion reaction. These
particles were determined experimentally to be fragments of the Rydberg
hydrogen matter that carry away the kinetic energy produced by DD fusion.

The Holhlid DD fusion experiment is an alternative explanation and a
replacement for the ultra low energy postulate that is the central LENR
mechanism in W-L theory.

Furthermore in the context of exploding wires, Ken Shoulders identified
both a Bright Mode and a Dark Mode EV that is produced by the formation
through condinsation of metal plasma excited by the heat of the electric
arc explosion. As a result of recent Nanoplasmonic research, these EVs are
more properly interpreted as Dark and Bright Mode surface plasmon
polaritons(SPP). The SPP is always produced by Nanoplasmonic reactions
involving nanoparticles such as those formed through Rydberg Matter
production.

Lewis Larsen co-father of the W-L theory should look closely at the
experiments of Lief Holhlid and adjust his theory accordingly. As explained
here previously, the weak force cannot produce neutrons as postulated by
W-L theory. As a valid alternative, muon production is currently an
experimentally verified mechanism that could produce muon catalyzed DD
fusion.

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Peter Gluck  wrote:

>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/09/sep-052015-redefining-misinformation-in.html
>
> that's all!
>
> Peter
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>

[Vo]:redefining misinformation in LENR

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/09/sep-052015-redefining-misinformation-in.html

that's all!

Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com