Re: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
That's nifty. The robots are working together like ants in a colony, 
with some specialization in roles. The capability of the whole swarm is 
greater than that of the individual.


In my opinion, a colony of ants or bees should be though of as a single 
biological entity, like an animal body.
An ant colony in the aggregate is more intelligent than individual ants. 
To put it the other way, an animal body may be though to as a giant 
colony of cells, plus helpful bacteria. The cells are usually in a 
symbiotic or cooperative relationship with one-another, but not always, 
as in the case of cancer.


Along the same lines, an airplane is defined as a collection of spare 
parts flying in formation, from which parts fall off much more often 
than people realize, according to aircraft maintenance people. See the 
U.S. Navy acronym TFOA.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread Daniel Rocha
But there is a crucial difference between dividing in organs and in
different individuals which is the ability to reach resources. A colony of
cells cannot do much other dividing tasks among themselves but it cannot
reach anything beyond its volume or it must count on passively on the
ecosystem's flow of matter and energy. But a hive can do it by itself
actively!


Re: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread Jed Rothwell

Daniel Rocha wrote:

But there is a crucial difference between dividing in organs and in 
different individuals which is the ability to reach resources. A 
colony of cells cannot do much other dividing tasks among themselves 
but it cannot reach anything beyond its volume or it must count on 
passively on the ecosystem's flow of matter and energy. But a hive can 
do it by itself actively! 


So can a mobile animal.

Of course there are huge differences between most colonies and animals . 
. . but in some cases the distinction is blurred. A jellyfish is a 
colony of cells


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Indeed, this is fertile ground for speculative fiction, especially
science fiction. One author I particularly admire, an author who has
thought a great deal about the ramifications Daniel and Jed point out,
particularly how it might play out on the level of human hive
consciousness, is Joe Haldeman. One of my favorite Haldeman novels is
a story where he explores the ramifications of humanity confronting
another alien species that strongly operates on the collective
conscious level. The novel is called the The Forever War. The reason
behind the forever war we eventually learn is due to a massive
misunderstanding that exists between the way individual humans
communicate with other human individuals, and the collective
consciousness of the alien race that doesn't know how to communicate
on the level of individual human beings. Meanwhile, humans don't know
how to communicate on the collective consciousness level either with
the alien race. Fortunately, both parties eventually figure it out
their misunderstandings, so you might say there is a happy ending -
with some reservations. ;-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forever_War

A question I often find myself asking is where does the mechanism (the
soul if you will) of self-awareness / self-consciousness reside?

Does consciousness or awareness, particularly some level of
SELF-awareness, an awareness of being able to make independent choices
reside within a single cell paramecium? How about a jellyfish, or
within the collective colony-body of the entire ant colony. We assume
individual human beings possess the self-awareness trait, though I
suspect certain cynics might beg to differ. What about on the level of
The Borg?

IMHO, certain eastern philosophies, such as Zen seem to do a good job
of describing the nature of collective consciousness, or more
precisely collective awareness. IMO, the best way to sense such
awareness is to stop thinking for a while. Just be. One may soon
discover that the you one has always identified with is nothing more
than a brief figment of one's own fickle imagination. When that
happens one has an opportunity to confront an even more interesting
mystery: Why do I still exist. That's when the fun starts.  ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread Daniel Rocha
What I wanted to say it is that a hive can extend itself for hundreds of
meters or kilometers simultaneously.

Daniel Rocha wrote:

 But there is a crucial difference between dividing in organs and in
 different individuals which is the ability to reach resources. A colony of
 cells cannot do much other dividing tasks among themselves but it cannot
 reach anything beyond its volume or it must count on passively on the
 ecosystem's flow of matter and energy. But a hive can do it by itself
 actively!


So can a mobile animal.

Of course there are huge differences between most colonies and animals . . .
but in some cases the distinction is blurred. A jellyfish is a colony of
cells

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:36 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:

 The novel is called the The Forever War.

This is similar to the Ender's Game series without the happy ending
for the invading hive mind species:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender's_Game

T



RE: [Vo]:Swarmanoids

2011-08-15 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Terry:

  The novel is called the The Forever War.
 
 This is similar to the Ender's Game series without the happy ending
 for the invading hive mind species:

Thanks Terry,

I've been meaning to read Orson Scott Card's Ender Game novels. I know
there's a long series of Sagas pertaining to Ender Game universe. 

Card is a controversial figure, being a devout Mormon and all. His religious
predilections have occasionally caused liberals and the gay and lesbian
community to get all riled up when Card sed something that perhaps he
shouldn't have. I gather Card has occasionally been verbally harassed at
book signings.

Despite Card's faults he still writes damned good thoughtful speculative
fiction. It just goes to show that even though one may embrace what some
might consider a restrictive religious philosophy, that does not necessarily
prevent a good imagination from roaming the universe. Card's prose can be
beautiful. And mind you - I'm a part-time dyslexic. ;-)

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks