Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread Drew Trusz
On 4/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Its been a while but im back looking for some more third-party advice. Please 
 take a
 look at my clients web site [http://www.gregoriopools.com/] - I just recently 
 rescued it
 from a fate worse then death, or at least made it so that it didn't have a 
 funky '90s look
 and feel (when i took over this year the site hadnt been updated since 2002).


Nothing wrong with the color pallette; it works fine.

The appearance issues have been well covered and David has made a good
start on the technical. From a technical point of view, drop the xml
prolog, it's unnecessary unless the pages are being servedf as
applicaltion/ xhtml+xml. All this does otherwise is to throw IE into
quirks mode, which might explain some of the IE issues you hint at. Go
all the way and go for the strict; html would be fine.

Most importantly, this is not tabular data so why is it a table
layout? There is a certain inconsistency between proclaim xhtml
validity and using a layout antithetical to the spirit of xhtml. Your
table is rife with font tags. Why?

And there are lovely arcane debates which can be engaged in over the
use of strong versus a span. And the perpetual favorites about when
markup crosses the line between semantic and styling. Those are fun
but really not the issue of the moment.

Seriously, why tables? This is a pretty basic two column layout which
is easily managable with floats and em for width (centering is a piece
of cake). If you haven't already, check out some of the layouts on
position is everything http://www.positioniseverything.net Or ask
here. You know we aren't shy about helping.

That said, it looks good. I don't see the jumps but then eyes vary.

drew

 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ''
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


RE: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread Ann Dietz
Hi,

I didn't spend a lot of time reviewing this site but I have to disagree with
Drew on the color scheme.  The clashing blues would send me running as a
customer.  I'd wonder if these guys' design sense was so bad that it would
also be reflected in their work.

I think the marbleized grayed-out blue would be complimented by a background
that is medium tan/light clay color... with a cream color font for the
contents of the left sidebar.

I would replace the bright blue #3300CC with something like #E0E191 -
R224,G225,B145.  Leave the grayed blue boxes that back up the sidebar text
alone and use a cream color for the font -- something somewhere around
#F1F0AB - R241,G240,B171.

Would look classier than the clashing blues.  

Just my 2 cents.

Ann
  


-Original Message-
From: Drew Trusz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:28 AM
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/



Nothing wrong with the color pallette; it works fine.





 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ''
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread Drew Trusz
On 4/11/06, Ann Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think the marbleized grayed-out blue would be complimented by a background
 that is medium tan/light clay color... with a cream color font for the
 contents of the left sidebar.

That's not marbleized blue, its crystal clear, see-to-the-bottom water.

Eyes do vary in what they see and tolerate. Although I do like your
color scheme.

drew

 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ''
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread webmaster
TY Drew,
  I am using the XHTML for 2 reasons, 1 - I plan on using XML based 
applications for customers to review their account online, as well as 
serve information on chemicals and relevent federal and state 
guidelines for pool  spa owners.

Table-wise, the tables are there right now to get a nice format and 
structure that works, I plan on converting to CSS based positioning in 
the near future - the only problem I have with that is that IE and other 
browsers tend to display CSS positioning in their own special ways, I 
want to try and make this as cross browser as possible while 
maintaining usability and a functional design. The font tags are there 
for really the same reason, until I go to full CSS based positioning and 
styling [this can be considered an alpha site, the previous beta 
version was much worse - MS Word HTML was the basis for it]. The 
next real revision of the site will use SPAN and DIV tags to take care of 
all of the formatting and positioning. [btw - this is a 3 column layout at 
this point :)]

I fixed the jumping problem yesterday afternoon, it was a problem with 
column widths that was just a brain-fart slip up.

I am working on revisions right now and will repost the link when I think 
its ready for another go around.


On 11 Apr 2006 at 6:27, Drew Trusz wrote:

 Nothing wrong with the color pallette; it works fine.
 
 The appearance issues have been well covered and David has made a good
 start on the technical. From a technical point of view, drop the xml
 prolog, it's unnecessary unless the pages are being servedf as
 applicaltion/ xhtml+xml. All this does otherwise is to throw IE into
 quirks mode, which might explain some of the IE issues you hint at. Go
 all the way and go for the strict; html would be fine.
 
 Most importantly, this is not tabular data so why is it a table
 layout? There is a certain inconsistency between proclaim xhtml
 validity and using a layout antithetical to the spirit of xhtml. Your
 table is rife with font tags. Why?
 
 And there are lovely arcane debates which can be engaged in over the
 use of strong versus a span. And the perpetual favorites about when
 markup crosses the line between semantic and styling. Those are fun
 but really not the issue of the moment.
 
 Seriously, why tables? This is a pretty basic two column layout which
 is easily managable with floats and em for width (centering is a piece
 of cake). If you haven't already, check out some of the layouts on
 position is everything http://www.positioniseverything.net Or ask
 here. You know we aren't shy about helping.
 
 That said, it looks good. I don't see the jumps but then eyes vary.
 
 drew


 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread webmaster
Thanks for the feedback - Oddly enough the Google ads block doesn't 
show many competitors, many of the sites listed either complement my 
clients site [he doesnt sell absolutely everything related to pools  
spas], or link to him [vendors, ad affiliates, etc] - plus it brings in some 
extra cash on the side; I will probably move it to a different location but 
with the competative ad filter that google has it is actually something 
that adds some enhancement to the site [someone clicks on a pool 
search link and is referred back to this site will know that they are 
highly recommended for instance] - the xhtml logo is for my own 
reference right now, a future integration of the site will be an XML 
based news section [company based news] and chemical FAQ that will 
show info on balancing pools and spas correctly - that is why i chose 
the XHTML standards verse HTML.

The navigation link titles are directly taken from the old site for now, as 
I stated, I am trying to bring this site into the future slowly and taking it 
one step at a time - I will be renaming the Sales links 'Information' 
because that is all they really do right now, a future online store will be 
accessed differently - I get your idea though and completely agree. As 
for further categorizing the products, that would make the Right 
navigation bar way to long - My client sells 5 different brands of spas 
and another 5 different types of pools [brand names] as well as 
subsets of each. The reason they are seperated the way they are right 
now is so that the customer can get access to any part of each 
category from any page, I think that too many clicks to get to say 
information about maintaining your pool would drive more customers 
off - My client has actually had customers that have been coming to 
the site and liking the fact that they can get to specific areas so quickly.

As for the maintenance and service sections - these are going to 
contain important information for consumers - owning a pool or spa is 
_not_ a hayride in the park, there is work involve and my client wants 
to provide owners with a sense of security by showing them common 
problems and how to fix them on their own, or what sort of services he 
provide to help them keep it as pain free as possible. I do not want to 
gloss over the responsibility of owning a pool, and I also want my client 
ot be able to showcase his [and his staffs'] knowledge of what can go 
wrong and that they know how to fix it.

I plan on streamlining the site more and more as time goes by, but I 
also am working within the constraints that the client has, he wants 
people to be able to make the proper choice (as well as do business 
with us) so he wants them to be able to get pertinent information fast. I 
will think about your ideas though, I just don't want his site to become 
too 'glitzy' like most of the pool  spa store websites out there [his 
competitor sites run from basic and holding no information, to 
extremely over glitzy with not enough of the right information]

I will work on the suggestions and post the link again when I am ready 
for another honest review.

Thanks again

On 11 Apr 2006 at 17:39, David Blakey wrote:

 I would start by taking out the Google Ads block.  There may be a
 chance that a rival site will attract customers away.
 
 The XHTML logo has no significance to visitors.  Take that off, too.
 
 If I was thinking about -  well, considering - buying a pool, I would
 be put off by that 'Sales' link.  Too powerful.  Show the punters the
 product, interest them, and then move on to selling to them.  The
 whole left navigation needs a re-think.  I would suggest a heading of
 'Products', with pools and spas listed below.  Maybe even a list of
 all the products, if they fit.  Can they be categorized any further?
 
 I also wouldn't want to think about 'Maintenance and service' up
 front.  It may be a sales point to throw in along the route to a
 purchase, but where it is now might make we think 'Maybe a pool would
 be too much trouble'.
 
 I really don't think that this site aligns very well with the sales
 process.
 
 Regards,
 David
 
 

 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread webmaster
Thanks for the feedback - I was thinking on using different colors or all 
caps but then i thought that the color would throw off the scheme of 
things [where color only highlights certain things] and that all caps 
would be too loud, that's why i chose to have the links use a hover 
underline only to keep them differentiated.

On 10 Apr 2006 at 14:51, Portman wrote:
SNIP
 I think that Arial font would be much more legible.  I also think that
 moving the logo a little down and a little right would look much
 better.  (So it has a white stripe on the left side.)  I also find
 that when things are underlined, people assume that they are links -
 it might be an idea to change the heading for each group of links to
 either all caps or something.
 
 I know all about working with a limited color palette (try a physical
 therapist who wants red, white and black!) - good job so far.
/SNIP

 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread webmaster
Thanks for the honest feedback. The main reason I have the design left aligned 
right 
now is because it is in development still and I want to get the design down pat 
before 
centering it and optimizing for different monitors. I agree about the centering 
personall 
[unfortunately most of the internet thinks just the opposite, they start right 
to left and 
leave it that way] having empty space on either side draws the eye towards the 
content. 
The thing about the font size is that in IE it displays just the right size 
[even on high 
resolution flat panels like I develop on in my home office], but FireFox 
properly [go 
figure] scales the font down to what the CSS specified size is - I don't want 
to mess 
around with multiple browser CSS right now so I tried to pick a happy medium - 
considering that most users still use IE to surf the internet, I chose a font 
size that 
worked allright there [I am trying out Arial right now but it is kind of large 
on IE].

The logo is kind of tight with the top, but I have this thing about too much 
whitespace at 
the very top of the page, I will move it down a bit and see how it affects the 
overall 
appearance - if necessary I will just set the BODY top margin to something 
other than 
0.

The side panels are a bit off alignment wise, the main reasons I did this is 1) 
to draw 
the eye more from the edge [probably the opposite is happening, but no 
complaints 
about navigation from site visitors yet], the right sideboard only does that 
because of 
the Google Adspace - I put that there to draw in some extra cash [of course - 
not much 
but its cash] and because, oddly enough, 80% of the ads displayed are 
complimentary - 
I have to filter out the occasional competitor, but a lot of ads that are shown 
lead to 
sites that refer to my client as contractors or service centers; the other 
sites are for 
items that don't really affect his business. I might move the google ads from a 
sidebar 
to a horizontal banner in the content.

The wiggling back and forth between some pages was indeed do to a width issue - 
I 
had originally set the right side width at 98px, but the Google ad is 120px 
[the smallest 
size they offer for vertical ad width] and I forgot to change the column widths 
accordingly so every now and then things would bounce around as the table 
adjusted 
the columns to try and fit everything.

I am thinking of using a different bullet, but I don't know if I want to get 
too flashy with 
the website right now, I get your point though - a more stand out bullet 
would probably 
highlight the points a bit better.

I am making revisions right now with some of these ideas and the other members 
suggestions and will repost the link when I am ready for another honest 
critique.

TY

Charles R King

On 10 Apr 2006 at 13:40, PBC Web Design wrote:

 At 01:08 PM 4/10/2006, you wrote:
 Its been a while but im back looking for some more third-party 
 advice. Please take a
 look at my clients web site [http://www.gregoriopools.com/] -
 
 I am trying to bring the site slowly into the future and working with
 a limited color palette [it just has to match the clients brand new
 logo].
 
 Please let me know what you think and the browser you use - I know
 for a fact that some things are kind of 'odd' in IE sometimes, but i
 want some honest opinions.
 
 Looking at it in Firefox on PC and providing honest (my opinion only)
 feedback:
 
 First thing I would do is center the design.  I have a personal pet
 peeve about left aligned sites with lots of open space on the right. 
 I have a 19 flat panel monitor and so I find this happening quite a
 bit on many web sites.  I find it harder to read having to cock my
 head or slide my peepers far left to view the site on my big monitor. 
 I feel that the web design world needs to start thinking more about
 monitor sizes and larger resolutions in general, but again that's
 personal opinion as is everything I say here.
 
 The font is very small - not illegible but I do think I'd go bigger
 with it.
 
 The logo is smack dab up tight against the top of the page - I think
 I'd give it a little breathing room.
 
 I think I would left align vs centering the info on both 
 sideboards.  Or maybe left align the left side and right align the
 right side.  The centering effect going on here along w/the lists in
 the page is a bit on the to much side of things for my liking.
 
 On this page: http://www.gregoriopools.com/whats_new.shtml I would
 give the text content a bit of white space on the right.  The content
 is butting up to the right sideboard.  There are more pages like this
 as well now that I'm moving around the site more.
 
 When you go back and forth 'tween these pages:
 http://www.gregoriopools.com/spa_sales.shtml
 
 http://www.gregoriopools.com/pool_moreinfo.shtml
 
 http://www.gregoriopools.com/spa_moreinfo.shtml
 
 http://www.gregoriopools.com/whygregorios.shtml
 
 your left sideboard has a jumping effect - it gets narrower so 
 

Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread Felix Miata
On 06/04/10 14:08 (GMT-0400) Charles King apparently typed:

 look at my clients web site http://www.gregoriopools.com/

Appears to need a whole lot of accessibility TLC. Here's what I see:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/charki1.jpg 278k hires linux screenshot
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/tmp/sc-charki.html SS setup  related links
Please note the disclaimer at the bottom of the setup page.

On accessibility: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/accessibility.html
-- 
Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but
rather expose them.Ephesians 5:11 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth

 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-11 Thread Drew Trusz
On 4/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 TY Drew,
   I am using the XHTML for 2 reasons, 1 - I plan on using XML based
 applications for customers to review their account online, as well as
 serve information on chemicals and relevent federal and state
 guidelines for pool  spa owners.

 Table-wise, the tables are there right now to get a nice format and
 structure that works, I plan on converting to CSS based positioning in
 the near future - the only problem I have with that is that IE and other
 browsers tend to display CSS positioning in their own special ways, I
 want to try and make this as cross browser as possible while
 maintaining usability and a functional design.

That explains it.

The caution about the prolog still stands.  Support for xml in
browsers is pretty much current generation so most older browsers
won't handle an xml page. If you haven't already, see:

http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_browsers.asp


If you want to learn a bit more about possible ways to deal with IE,
http://www.positioniseverything.net , is always a good start. The IE
section explains what IE does very clearly. It also offers a number of
hacks. Keep in mind that the hacks may or may not work with IE7. There
are other perfectly valid ways to handle many of the problems without
the hacks. Be forewarned some of those ways will raise accusations of
sinful if not outrightly perverted syntax, even though the syntax is
perfectly valid -- divitis and excessive markup.

Good luck with the update.

drew

 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
   Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ''
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-10 Thread PBC Web Design

At 01:08 PM 4/10/2006, you wrote:
Its been a while but im back looking for some more third-party 
advice. Please take a

look at my clients web site [http://www.gregoriopools.com/] -

I am trying to bring the site slowly into the future and working 
with a limited color palette

[it just has to match the clients brand new logo].

Please let me know what you think and the browser you use - I know 
for a fact that
some things are kind of 'odd' in IE sometimes, but i want some 
honest opinions.


Looking at it in Firefox on PC and providing honest (my opinion only) feedback:

First thing I would do is center the design.  I have a personal pet 
peeve about left aligned sites with lots of open space on the 
right.  I have a 19 flat panel monitor and so I find this happening 
quite a bit on many web sites.  I find it harder to read having to 
cock my head or slide my peepers far left to view the site on my big 
monitor.  I feel that the web design world needs to start thinking 
more about monitor sizes and larger resolutions in general, but again 
that's personal opinion as is everything I say here.


The font is very small - not illegible but I do think I'd go bigger with it.

The logo is smack dab up tight against the top of the page - I think 
I'd give it a little breathing room.


I think I would left align vs centering the info on both 
sideboards.  Or maybe left align the left side and right align the 
right side.  The centering effect going on here along w/the lists in 
the page is a bit on the to much side of things for my liking.


On this page: http://www.gregoriopools.com/whats_new.shtml I would 
give the text content a bit of white space on the right.  The content 
is butting up to the right sideboard.  There are more pages like this 
as well now that I'm moving around the site more.


When you go back and forth 'tween these pages:
http://www.gregoriopools.com/spa_sales.shtml

http://www.gregoriopools.com/pool_moreinfo.shtml

http://www.gregoriopools.com/spa_moreinfo.shtml

http://www.gregoriopools.com/whygregorios.shtml

your left sideboard has a jumping effect - it gets narrower so 
something is out of whack in the width somewhere I think.  There are 
more pages doing this I just didn't list them all.


So, those are the things I'd be working on if it were my site to 
do.  On a creative note, I think I'd also give the lists something 
besides the round bullet - something blue maybe an arrow or something 
different is all I can think of right now.  Hope that helps :)



:: Deb
:: http://www.puterbug.com
:: Professional Web Design, SEO
:: VPS Web Hosting Services
:: Offlist eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
  Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


Re: [wdvltalk] Site Check: http://www.gregoriopools.com/

2006-04-10 Thread David Blakey
I would start by taking out the Google Ads block.  There may be a 
chance that a rival site will attract customers away.


The XHTML logo has no significance to visitors.  Take that off, too.

If I was thinking about -  well, considering - buying a pool, I would 
be put off by that 'Sales' link.  Too powerful.  Show the punters the 
product, interest them, and then move on to selling to them.  The 
whole left navigation needs a re-think.  I would suggest a heading of 
'Products', with pools and spas listed below.  Maybe even a list of 
all the products, if they fit.  Can they be categorized any further?


I also wouldn't want to think about 'Maintenance and service' up 
front.  It may be a sales point to throw in along the route to a 
purchase, but where it is now might make we think 'Maybe a pool would 
be too much trouble'.


I really don't think that this site aligns very well with the sales process.

Regards,
David
 



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/307 - Release Date: 10/04/06



 • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • 
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
  Send Your Posts To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
To change subscription settings, add a password or view the web interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk

  http://www.wdvl.com  ___

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.