Re: [whatwg] Site-Wide Heading Element
I agree with Gary, perfect solution. But, as I reach to understand, there is -- or there will be -- the need, as devices and uses of web pages evolve, for thinking on or considering some new descendant element tags of the ancestor . May we extend the definition of the element beyond_ a group of introductory or navigational aids_? The common and ordinary use that developers and publishers do of a are , for example, to place banners, logos, asides, etcetera, which follow the behavioural pattern of the physical life Shall we do not take in consideration these use for future representations in sectioning elements? I do not see clear the presented in the nightly spec, substep 1.1 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#outline [1] _"create AN IMPLIED HEADING and let that be the heading for the current section."_ An implied heading created,with no semantic content in, does not look 'comfortable' to me. Cheers Links: -- [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#outline
Re: [whatwg] Site-Wide Heading Element
On 30.06.15 03:18, Garrett Smith wrote: On 6/29/15, Barry Smith wrote: From: "Garrett Smith" Hey Garrett, My apologizes for not replying until now. When I posted my reply to the "Site-Wide Heading Element" thread, you were right and I should have posted a more complete example. Here is what I should have given as an example: M y W eb S ite Using the element for purely stylistic purposes. Placing them within the element displays the exact same header as is in the embedded
Re: [whatwg] Site-Wide Heading Element
sounds nice to me. As far as we move onto standarized browsers and mobile devices as the way we connect to the web, the proposed could be equal to the reference or representation shown in _svg=icon _or_ link-rel="ico"_ Just thinking. --- Delfi Ramirez My digital signature [1] +34 633 589231 del...@segonquart.net [2] twitter: delfinramirez IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart [3] http://segonquart.net [4] http://delfiramirez.info [5] On 2015-06-30 11:48, Martin Janecke wrote: > On 30.06.15 03:18, Garrett Smith wrote: > On 6/29/15, Barry Smith wrote: From: "Garrett Smith" > Hey Garrett, My apologizes for not replying until > now. When I posted my reply to the "Site-Wide Heading Element" thread, you > were right and I should have posted a more complete example. Here is what I > should have given as an example: src="scripts/header.js" type="text/javascript"> class="styledText"> M y > W class="word">ebclass="letterS">S ite > Using the element for purely stylistic purposes. Placing them > within the element displays the exact same header as is in the > embedded
