date:20070209

Re: [Wicket-user] writing unit tests

2007-02-09 Thread Carfield Yim

WicketTester is good for me for most case... may be you can share the
complications you have?

On 1/31/07, Nino Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I've been wondering about best practices for writing unit tests with wicket?
>
>
>
> Looking around the source of wicket, I can see that most uses junit. A few
> places wicket tester are used.
>
>
>
> Last time I wrote a test I tried writing using jwebunit and http unit (as I
> remember). I tried using the wicket test framework, but it gave me some
> complications (might be because I was new to the wicket world). Also this
> was on wicket 1.x.
>
>
>
> What do others do?
>
>
>
> -Nino Wael
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Easier way to force resourceKey for a Validator error message

2007-02-09 Thread Peter Thomas

I was earlier returning a "***" kind of String when the Spring MessageSource
failed to resolve the key (so that missing error messages would be
obvious).  Obviously that was the wrong thing to do.  The trick is to return
null so that Wicket continue trying to resolve the message in the sequence
you described.

Thanks Igor for the tip - things work as they should now : )

On 2/3/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

i believe the search order is to first try the id.key and then to try key,
so your messages should still resolve properly. can you break in localizer
and see what its doing?

-igor

On 2/3/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm migrating an existing (Spring MVC) JSP application to Wicket and
> this application already has i18n with just one largish properties file,
> named as per Spring tradition "messages.properties".
>
> I'm using Wicket 1.2.4.  I was able to easily delegate looking up of
> messages to Spring's "MessageSource" by doing
> getResourceSettings().addStringResourceLoader(new IStringResourceLoader() in
> the Application class.  This is working fine.
>
> My problem is when I have a custom Validator attached to a form
> component.  In the Validator, I am trying to force the resourceKey that will
> be used to resolve the error message by overriding "protected String
> resourceKey(FormComponent)".
>
> The problem is the Component id is always being prefixed to whatever I
> try to set the resourceKey to. All I want to do is to tell wicket to use a
> specific key as-is for a validation error and not prefix anything to it.
>
> I guess that if I were using the Wicket default StringResourceLoader, I
> could have used an ApplicationName.properties to "generalize" messages.
> But you see my problem, this is a migration and I would really like to use
> my existing resource bundles as is and I am tied to the Spring message
> source for now.
>
> Any way around this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter.
>
>
> -
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier.
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Adding more roles to wicket-auth-roles

2007-02-09 Thread Igor Vaynberg


the project is really meant to be an example rather then something for you
to use directly in your project, so feel free to cannibalize whatever code
you want from it.

-igor


On 2/9/07, Matt Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I'm trying to use wicket-auth-roles for authentication and authorization,
but there are a few things I'm not quite understanding. I really like the
annotation base authorization, but the two provided roles (ADMIN and USER)
are nowhere near enough to cover our use cases. I'm sure that this is a
common problem so I'm guessing that I'm missing something obvious with
regards to adding more roles or replacing the existing Roles class with our
own. Roles is final so I can't extend it directly and replacing it with our
own implementation seems out of the question as well because it renders
useless all of the existing convenience class around annotations and
authorization that utilize the provided Roles class directly.

So, am I missing something?

Matt

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Query regarding formation of URL for a link

2007-02-09 Thread Igor Vaynberg

when a url is invoked wicket doesnt know its a "link" component. if we did
it this way we would have to build in knowledge of all components into
wicket, and that would throw out custom components out of the window. this
way its nice and generic, take this object and invoke this listener
interface on it.

and yes, the other reason is that some components have two or more listener
interfaces.

-igor

On 2/9/07, Swaroop Belur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello All

This is w.r.t url generated for links. I was looking at the wicket
examples page and did a view source for
a link. One link had this URL :
http://localhost:8080/wicket-examples/linkomatic;jsessionid=7hp5u436aji7?wicket:interface=:0:actionLink::ILinkListener

My doubt is regarding ILinkListener. I was wondering whether it is
absolutely necessary to have it in the URL.
My reasoning is this - since wicket can find out the type of component by
looking at component id which in this case
happens to be actionLink. So if wicket can find out that it is a link
component , then it can automcatically
call the onClick() method of this link component.

Was the listener included because there is a possibility of more than one
listener being implemented by the
actionLink component and hence wicket needs to know which listener's
method shud get triggered. ?

Regards
swaroop belur

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

58 matches

Mail list logo