from:"jamieballing"

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with Close the top-level modal window first message

2007-07-09 Thread jamieballing


It turns out if you have a modal within an iframe (i.e. backed by a page) and
want a secondary modal, that modal also needs to be in an iframe.

Incidentally, the problem occurs in one of the wicketstuff examples. If you
go to:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Aorg.apache.wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.modal.ModalWindowPage
   * open the modal with a page
   * click the open another modal link
   * click the X in the uppper right of the secondary modal

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-%22Close-the-top-level-modal-window-first%22-message-tf4047233.html#a11512558
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Problem with Close the top-level modal window first message

2007-07-08 Thread jamieballing

We have a modal window which is backed by a page/iframe (I'll refer to this
as the primary modal). On this page-based modal window there is link which
brings up another modal window, which is not backed by a page (I'll call
this the secondary modal).

We have OK and Cancel buttons on this secondary modal window. In the onClick
handling for these buttons, we invoke ModalWindow.closeCurrent(target).
Whenever the user clicks on one of these buttons from within the secondary
modal window we get a javascript popup mesage:

You can't close this modal window. Close the top-level modal window first.

It appears that the window close processing mistakenly thinks we are trying
to close the primary modal window. It might have something to do with the
iframe logic referred to in the Wicket.Window.create function.
Interestingly, the close icon in the upper right corner of the modal works
fine.

Do you have any ideas on how we can prevent this popup message from
occurring?

Thanks,
Jamie
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-%22Close-the-top-level-modal-window-first%22-message-tf4047233.html#a11496134
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] How to open modal window after Page submit?

2007-05-29 Thread jamieballing


We have a modal window which is backed by a Page. Since this is a non-ajax
submit and I don't have an AjaxRequestTarget, I close the modal window after
the Page is submitted by writing javascript which we copied from
ModalWindow.getCloseJavacript(). This all works fine...

The problem is that after the modal window is closed, we need to popup a new
modal window in some cases.

How can we accomplish this? Is there some way to get the javascript for
displaying a modal window? Can I create some behavior and trigger it on the
server?

Thanks,
Jamie
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-open-modal-window-after-Page-submit--tf3837134.html#a10864242
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] How to close a modal window backed by a page?

2007-05-11 Thread jamieballing


We have a modal window which is backed by a Page (rather than a Panel). We
are using a Page because we have a file upload control which doesn't work
with Ajax.

The modal window has a form on it with a submit link. How do I get the modal
window to close after the form is submitted (i.e. during the submit
processing)? There is no AjaxRequestTarget for the form onSubmit().

Thanks,
Jamie


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-close-a-modal-window-backed-by-a-page--tf3728622.html#a10436196
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] RadioChoice with ajax in wicket 1.3?

2007-05-03 Thread jamieballing


I am getting an error that a RadioChoice control doesn't work via ajax... the
getInputAsArray() method on the FormComponent returns null. I did see a post
indicating that this was a bug in 1.2...

[ wicket-Bugs-1501513 ] RadioGroup/RadioChoice doesn't work with
AjaxUpdateBehavior
http://www.nabble.com/--wicket-Bugs-1501513---RadioGroup-RadioChoice-doesn%27t-work-with-AjaxUpdateBehavior-tf1740654.html#a4730009

Was this ever resolved? Does it work in 1.3?

Thanks,
Jamie
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RadioChoice-with-ajax-in-wicket-1.3--tf3689281.html#a10314203
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Could not find form issue in 1.3 with buttons not on a form

2007-05-01 Thread jamieballing


We have hit an issue migrating to 1.3. We use components of type Button and
add ajax behaviors to those buttons to do stuff. These buttons are not
currently added to any form. When those Button components coexist on a page
with an actual form which is submitted, we get an exception
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Could not find Form parent for
[MarkupContainer...

Stepping through the code, the problem appears to be that Form
findSubmittingButton() method visits all children of type
IFormSubmittingComponent on the page and calls getForm() for that component
(to see if it is the current form). If any such component isn't actually on
a form, wicket throws an exception. Perhaps the getForm() method shouldn't
throw an exception but rather return a null value since I think form
components are allowed to exist outside a form?

Our current workaround is to replace these Button components with AjaxLinks.

Please let me know if you agree that this is an issue and, if so, whether
you expect to address it.

Many thanks,
Jamie
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/%22Could-not-find-form%22-issue-in-1.3-with-buttons-not-on-a-form-tf3676170.html#a10272507
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Recommendation for multipart upload in modal window in 1.3?

2007-05-01 Thread jamieballing


We need to have a file upload control on a modal window that updates via
ajax. I know that 1.2 had issues with this, but does 1.3 support it? 

In any event, how would you recommend we approach this?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Recommendation-for-multipart-upload-in-modal-window-in-1.3--tf3677936.html#a10277955
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Way to prevent page versioning for a request in 1.3?

2007-04-29 Thread jamieballing

We are currently using the incubating-beta1 release. I was stepping through
the source in a debugger and I'm not sure older versions of the page are
preserved in the cache (at least when update by an ajax request). I did a
simple test:
* I went to a versioned page
* clicked an ajax control which updates that page
* hit my browser back button (which didn't actually go to the server but
reloaded the locally cached page)
* clicked on another ajax control on the page
At this point I got a page expired message.

This raises a couple questions:
1) This doesn't sound like the bug you are describing... Is the behavior we
are observing correct behavior?
2) Do we need to do anything to enable or set the size of the page cache?
3) Is there a more recent version we should be using than the
incubating-beta1 snapshot?

Many Thanks,
Jamie

Matej Knopp-2 wrote:

This is wrong. Even if page version increments, the ajax links should
be valid. There was a bug in wicket 1.3 where the wicket still allowed
you to do unversioned ajax requests, but that's should be gone
already. Can you please test it with most recent 1.3?

-Matej

On 4/27/07, jamieballing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We are experiencing a problem in our application because we are doing
something out of the ordinary.

We have an applet on our page which makes a wicket request on behalf of
the
page. The request is a form submit which causes a file upload, but it
doesn't affect the state of the page. When wicket 1.3 processes the
request
and calls getResponsePage() it identifies the response as an instance of
PageRequestTarget which causes the last version in the cache to
increment.

The applet doesn't do anything with the response from wicket, so the
existing wicket urls on the page all still refer to the old page version.
Therefore, when you click anything (e.g. ajax links) we get a page
expired
because the versioning is out of synch.

How would you recommend we approach this problem? Is there someway to
tell
wicket in the request not to increment the last page version or tell it
that
we are using a different target type than PageRequestTarget?

Thanks,
Jamie
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Way-to-prevent-page-versioning-for-a-request-in-1.3--tf3658645.html#a10222425
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Way-to-prevent-page-versioning-for-a-request-in-1.3--tf3658645.html#a10248419
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Wicket-user] Way to prevent page versioning for a request in 1.3?

2007-04-27 Thread jamieballing


We are experiencing a problem in our application because we are doing
something out of the ordinary.

We have an applet on our page which makes a wicket request on behalf of the
page. The request is a form submit which causes a file upload, but it
doesn't affect the state of the page. When wicket 1.3 processes the request
and calls getResponsePage() it identifies the response as an instance of
PageRequestTarget which causes the last version in the cache to increment.

The applet doesn't do anything with the response from wicket, so the
existing wicket urls on the page all still refer to the old page version.
Therefore, when you click anything (e.g. ajax links) we get a page expired
because the versioning is out of synch.

How would you recommend we approach this problem? Is there someway to tell
wicket in the request not to increment the last page version or tell it that
we are using a different target type than PageRequestTarget?

Thanks,
Jamie
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Way-to-prevent-page-versioning-for-a-request-in-1.3--tf3658645.html#a10222425
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] NPE rendering ListView Item in 1.3

2007-04-24 Thread jamieballing


Thanks... Where is the best place to keep up to date on the snapshots? Are
you versioning them yet and is there a current recommended snapshot or
should we plan to keep up to date with the latest?

Jamie



igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
 first start off by showing your code. second, update to the latest
 1.3snapshot. in my code
 listview.java doesnt have line 709.
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 4/23/07, jamieballing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 We are trying to migrate to 1.3 and have encountered an issue. We aren't
 sure
 if this is related to the way we are using it or if there might be a bug.
 We
 are getting a NPE which bubbles up into a message that wicket can't
 render
 a
 component. The stack trace is:

 Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
 at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.renderItem(ListView.java:709)
 at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.onRender(ListView.java:670)
 at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1495)
 at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1159)
 at
 wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1329)
 at
 wicket.MarkupContainer.onComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1264)
 at wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1670)

 One thing of note is that the component ID which wicket is ultimately
 complaining about doesn't exist anywhere in the application... there is
 no
 feedbackul, but is a feedback. I know there are some suffixes that
 get
 added now, but I thought these should be numeric. Here is the message:

 wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Exception in rendering component:
 [MarkupContainer [Component id = feedbackul, page =
 test.page.search.SearchResultsPage, path =
 6:lpContent:uploadPanel:documentManagementModal:content:panel:for
 m:urlArea:urlBorder:feedbackIndicator:feedback:feedbackul.FeedbackPanel$2,
 isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]]

 Do you have any thoughts or direction on how we should resolve this? We
 are
 trying to determine if we should proceed with 1.3 for our app or stick
 with
 1.2.

 Many thanks,
 Jamie

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/NPE-rendering-ListView-Item-in-1.3-tf3635715.html#a10152492
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 
 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/NPE-rendering-ListView-Item-in-1.3-tf3635715.html#a10161932
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] NPE rendering ListView Item in 1.3

2007-04-23 Thread jamieballing


We are trying to migrate to 1.3 and have encountered an issue. We aren't sure
if this is related to the way we are using it or if there might be a bug. We
are getting a NPE which bubbles up into a message that wicket can't render a
component. The stack trace is:

Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.renderItem(ListView.java:709)
at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.onRender(ListView.java:670)
at wicket.Component.render(Component.java:1495)
at wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1159)
at
wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1329)
at
wicket.MarkupContainer.onComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1264)
at wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:1670)

One thing of note is that the component ID which wicket is ultimately
complaining about doesn't exist anywhere in the application... there is no
feedbackul, but is a feedback. I know there are some suffixes that get
added now, but I thought these should be numeric. Here is the message:

wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Exception in rendering component:
[MarkupContainer [Component id = feedbackul, page =
test.page.search.SearchResultsPage, path =
6:lpContent:uploadPanel:documentManagementModal:content:panel:for
m:urlArea:urlBorder:feedbackIndicator:feedback:feedbackul.FeedbackPanel$2,
isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]]

Do you have any thoughts or direction on how we should resolve this? We are
trying to determine if we should proceed with 1.3 for our app or stick with
1.2. 

Many thanks,
Jamie

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/NPE-rendering-ListView-Item-in-1.3-tf3635715.html#a10152492
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Any ajax callback for when a panel is closed?

2007-04-04 Thread jamieballing


We have a modal window with several tabs. We want to validate the data on the
tab after when the user navigates away from the tab. The tab is currently
just a panel. Is there any callback we can when the panel is closed use to
trigger validation?

Thanks,
Jamie
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Any-ajax-callback-for-when-a-panel-is-closed--tf3529142.html#a9848599
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] no public field or method named onfocus message

2007-03-26 Thread jamieballing


We have a problem with a page that has an applet on it. The issue only occurs
in Firefox (it works in IE7). 

If I click on a link that brings up a modal window, I get an error in the
debug output indicating that it can't find a public onfocus event. The
debug output appears below:
---
INFO: Initiating Ajax GET request on
/app?wicket:interface=:1:content:searchResultListerPanel:listerForm:dataView:1:documentDetail:actionsPickList:optionListView:4:optionLink::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=1random=0.0007002777531609494
INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
INFO: Received ajax response (1073 characters)
INFO:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
id=content_searchResultListerPanel_documentManagementModal ![CDATA[div
style=display:none
id=content_searchResultListerPanel_documentManagementModal
div
id=content_searchResultListerPanel_documentManagementModal_content
TODO
/div
/div]]/componentevaluate![CDATA[var element =
document.getElementById(content_searchResultListerPanel_documentManagementModal_content);
var settings = new Object();
settings.minWidth=200;
settings.minHeight=200;
settings.className=w_blue;
settings.width=600;
settings.height=600;
settings.resizable=true;
settings.element = element;
settings.cookieId=modal-window-8207246;
settings.title=This is a placholder;
settings.mask=semi-transparent;
settings.onClose = function() { var
wcall=wicketAjaxGet('/app?wicket:interface=:1:content:searchResultListerPanel:documentManagementModal::IBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=1',
function() { }, function() { }); };
Wicket.Window.create(settings).show();
]]/evaluate/ajax-response
INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
ERROR: Error while parsing response: Java class
com.test.wicket.panel.upload.applet.FileDropApplet has no public field or
method named onfocus
INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...
INFO: Invoking failure handler(s)...
---
Just for kicks, I added a couple methods named getOnfocus() and
onfocus() that return strings in the FileDropApplet class, but it didn't
seem to make any difference.

Do you have any thoughts or suggestions for what my be causing this?

Many thanks,
Jamie

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/no-public-field-or-method-named-%22onfocus%22-message-tf3469746.html#a9682250
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Correct way to implement ajax event not tied to a direct javascript event?

2007-03-22 Thread jamieballing


We have a situation where we want to have an applet invoke an ajax event
after it finishes something. We don't want the ajax event to be invoked by a
user action (i.e. onclick).

Our current approach is that we extend the AjaxEventBehvior, make the
getCallbackScript() public so that the applet can see it, and set the event
to be some string that isn't tied to an actual javascript event (e.g.
XXX). We then do our thing in the onEvent() method and everything seems to
work.

This seems a little messy... Is there a better way to accomplish it (e.g.
extend AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior)?

Many Thanks,
Jamie
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Correct-way-to-implement-ajax-event-not-tied-to-a-direct-javascript-event--tf3448858.html#a9619123
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Any way to disable the modal window close warning?

2007-03-18 Thread jamieballing

I am trying to figure out a way to achieve a file upload launched from a
ModalWindow.

I understand that there is no way to do the multipart upload via Ajax
(http://www.nabble.com/FileUpload-with-AjaxSubmitButton--tf1699316.html#a4611514).

Therefore, I am trying to do an old fashioned form submission from the modal
window. When the form submission happens, I get the Reloading this page
will cause the modal window disappear message. There is no point
circumventing this message using ajax submission for the reason mentioned
above.

Is there any way to suppress this message modal close message using the
wicket/extension API?

If not, would you advise that I attempt to customize the ModalWindow? I see
the message in wicket/extionsions/ajax/markup/html/modal/res/modal.js...
Do you feel like giving me any pointers on how I could add a parameter to
the constructor and hook it in?

I really appreciate your help and direction.

Thanks,
Jamie
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Any-way-to-disable-the-modal-window-close-warning--tf3423747.html#a9542603
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user