[Wikitech-l] Try out MediaWiki Vagrant

2013-03-28 Thread Ori Livneh
Vagrant is a command-line tool for automatically provisioning virtual machines 
according to scripted specifications. The mediawiki-vagrant project bundles 
together specifications for quickly and easily provisioning a virtual machine 
running MediaWiki, suitable for development work.

I announced it a few months ago, when I had something nominally useful to 
share. Some people found it useful, but it was something I had cobbled together 
in a hacky way as I was learning Vagrant, and I wasn't very happy with the end 
result. In the intervening months, I got a lot of useful suggestions, and 
became more proficient in writing Vagrant and Puppet configurations, so I 
decided to do things over.

There's a lot more work to do (better profiling tools!), but I think it works 
quite well now, so I would appreciate some testing and feedback from others.

Installation instructions are available here: 
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Vagrant

I hope you check it out, and that you find it useful. Feedback would be much 
appreciated.

I'd also like to publicly thank Yurik for testing this extensively on Windows 
and providing detailed logs when things broke. Thanks, Yurik!

--
Ori Livneh



___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Petr Bena
What about inserting another domain just to prevent confusion and to
keep current redirects, which would ONLY allow api, such as

commons.api.wikipedia.org

the *.api.project would just be some kind of universal api gateway
for all domains

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Please draft an RFC at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/RFC. :-)


 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Alternative_Commons_Domains
 Please share your comments.


 commons.wikipedia.org already redirects to commons.wikimedia.org (for
 historical reasons, maybe), so that has to be considered.


 Yes, it redirects. But to solve the problem I'm describing, the API would
 need to be served from commons.wikipedia.org.


 I think what
 you're proposing is also kind of confusing and I'm wondering if there
 aren't better ways to approach the problem.


 I'm open to suggestions, but I'd rather not wait until CentralAuth gets
 completely redesigned and rewritten.

 --
 Juliusz


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread K. Peachey
How is that meant to pervent confusion? you are just sticking a extra
.api in the address.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
 What about inserting another domain just to prevent confusion and to
 keep current redirects, which would ONLY allow api, such as

 commons.api.wikipedia.org

 the *.api.project would just be some kind of universal api gateway
 for all domains

 On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org 
 wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Please draft an RFC at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/RFC. :-)


 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Alternative_Commons_Domains
 Please share your comments.


 commons.wikipedia.org already redirects to commons.wikimedia.org (for
 historical reasons, maybe), so that has to be considered.


 Yes, it redirects. But to solve the problem I'm describing, the API would
 need to be served from commons.wikipedia.org.


 I think what
 you're proposing is also kind of confusing and I'm wondering if there
 aren't better ways to approach the problem.


 I'm open to suggestions, but I'd rather not wait until CentralAuth gets
 completely redesigned and rewritten.

 --
 Juliusz


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Petr Bena
or MAYBE, even more evil:

commons.wikimedia.api.wikipedia.org -- where first two domains
commons.wikimedia would point to existing domain, that would actually
allow you to enable this gateway instantly on all projects for all
domains, so that you could use api of fr.wikisource using wikispecies
domain:

fr.wikisource.api.wikispecies.org

I don't know if that is actually good for anything :) but it would
surely allow you to bypass cookie restrictions everywhere (for api's
only). On the other way, I think we could just think of using some
different technology than cookies to avoid mess with DNS

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
 What about inserting another domain just to prevent confusion and to
 keep current redirects, which would ONLY allow api, such as

 commons.api.wikipedia.org

 the *.api.project would just be some kind of universal api gateway
 for all domains

 On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org 
 wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Please draft an RFC at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/RFC. :-)


 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Alternative_Commons_Domains
 Please share your comments.


 commons.wikipedia.org already redirects to commons.wikimedia.org (for
 historical reasons, maybe), so that has to be considered.


 Yes, it redirects. But to solve the problem I'm describing, the API would
 need to be served from commons.wikipedia.org.


 I think what
 you're proposing is also kind of confusing and I'm wondering if there
 aren't better ways to approach the problem.


 I'm open to suggestions, but I'd rather not wait until CentralAuth gets
 completely redesigned and rewritten.

 --
 Juliusz


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Petr Bena
because right now commons.wikipedia.org is already redirecting to wikimedia

if you change this behavior now, you may confuse some people who were
expecting it to redirect... but I don't really care

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
 How is that meant to pervent confusion? you are just sticking a extra
 .api in the address.

 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
 What about inserting another domain just to prevent confusion and to
 keep current redirects, which would ONLY allow api, such as

 commons.api.wikipedia.org

 the *.api.project would just be some kind of universal api gateway
 for all domains

 On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org 
 wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Please draft an RFC at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/RFC. :-)


 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Alternative_Commons_Domains
 Please share your comments.


 commons.wikipedia.org already redirects to commons.wikimedia.org (for
 historical reasons, maybe), so that has to be considered.


 Yes, it redirects. But to solve the problem I'm describing, the API would
 need to be served from commons.wikipedia.org.


 I think what
 you're proposing is also kind of confusing and I'm wondering if there
 aren't better ways to approach the problem.


 I'm open to suggestions, but I'd rather not wait until CentralAuth gets
 completely redesigned and rewritten.

 --
 Juliusz


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Seb35
A small issue in this proposition: sub-subdomains are not currently  
covered by the https certificate.


~s

Le Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:41:41 +0100, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com a écrit:

What about inserting another domain just to prevent confusion and to
keep current redirects, which would ONLY allow api, such as

commons.api.wikipedia.org

the *.api.project would just be some kind of universal api gateway
for all domains

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org  
wrote:

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:


Please draft an RFC at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/RFC. :-)



http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Alternative_Commons_Domains
Please share your comments.



commons.wikipedia.org already redirects to commons.wikimedia.org (for
historical reasons, maybe), so that has to be considered.



Yes, it redirects. But to solve the problem I'm describing, the API  
would

need to be served from commons.wikipedia.org.



I think what
you're proposing is also kind of confusing and I'm wondering if there
aren't better ways to approach the problem.



I'm open to suggestions, but I'd rather not wait until CentralAuth gets
completely redesigned and rewritten.

--
Juliusz




___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Try out MediaWiki Vagrant

2013-03-28 Thread Dan Andreescu
This is awesome, I've used it as a total MediaWiki noob to poke around at
the internals.  One suggestion I'd have is to include a script that
populates some sample data in the db (pages, users, edits, etc.).  Does
anyone have such a thing, should we dump a particularly active test setup
from somewhere, or would we need to make something new?


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Vagrant is a command-line tool for automatically provisioning virtual
 machines according to scripted specifications. The mediawiki-vagrant
 project bundles together specifications for quickly and easily provisioning
 a virtual machine running MediaWiki, suitable for development work.

 I announced it a few months ago, when I had something nominally useful to
 share. Some people found it useful, but it was something I had cobbled
 together in a hacky way as I was learning Vagrant, and I wasn't very happy
 with the end result. In the intervening months, I got a lot of useful
 suggestions, and became more proficient in writing Vagrant and Puppet
 configurations, so I decided to do things over.

 There's a lot more work to do (better profiling tools!), but I think it
 works quite well now, so I would appreciate some testing and feedback from
 others.

 Installation instructions are available here:
 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Vagrant

 I hope you check it out, and that you find it useful. Feedback would be
 much appreciated.

 I'd also like to publicly thank Yurik for testing this extensively on
 Windows and providing detailed logs when things broke. Thanks, Yurik!

 --
 Ori Livneh



 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Next Bugday: Skin and page rendering, April 2nd, 16:30 - 20:30 UTC

2013-03-28 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi,

Please join us on the next Wikimedia Bugday:

 Tuesday, April 02, 2013 from 16:30 UTC until 20:30 UTC [1]
  in #wikimedia-office on Freenode IRC [2]

We will be triaging skin and page rendering bug reports [3] as proposed
on the Bugsquad project talk page [4].

Everyone is welcome to join, and no technical knowledge needed! It's an
easy way to get involved in the community or to give something back.
This is part of a weekly QA activity [5], so we encourage you to triage
throughout the week and record your activity on the bug day etherpad
[6].

This information and more can be found here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage/20130402

For more information on triaging in general, check out
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage

I look forward to seeing you there!

andre


[1] Timezone converter: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html
[2] See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC for more info on IRC chat
[3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage/20130402
[4] 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project_talk:WikiProject_Bug_Squad#Bug_Day_Topics_for_April_25280
[5] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Weekly_goals
[6] http://etherpad.wmflabs.org/pad/p/BugTriage
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Wikidata queries

2013-03-28 Thread Denny Vrandečić
We have a first write up of how we plan to support queries in Wikidata.
Comments on our errors and requests for clarifications are more than
welcome.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/Queries

Cheers,
Denny

P.S.: unfortunately, no easter eggs inside.

-- 
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugzilla Weekly Report

2013-03-28 Thread Antoine Musso
Le 27/03/13 15:35, Andre Klapper a écrit :
 OpenStack also have live graphs at http://status.openstack.org/bugday/
 for their bugdays (e.g.
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugDays/20121213BugSquashing ), but I
 have no idea about the implementation, plus bugdays look dormant there.
 If anybody has contacts to OpenStack, I'd be interested to know.

Do hangout on IRC in #openstack-infra during US business days.  The
folks there are most probably maintaining this :-]

As usual, just introduce yourself, state you are related to Wikimedia
and you will receive a warm welcome!

-- 
Antoine hashar Musso


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugzilla Weekly Report

2013-03-28 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:35 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
 OpenStack also have live graphs at http://status.openstack.org/bugday/
 for their bugdays (e.g.
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugDays/20121213BugSquashing ), but I
 have no idea about the implementation, plus bugdays look dormant there.
 If anybody has contacts to OpenStack, I'd be interested to know.

Thanks to Luis for making contact!

Thierry Carrez answered that the code to generate those graphs is at
https://github.com/ttx/bugdaystats , and There is a stats file refresh
that runs regularly (like in a crontab) and then client-side code to
generate dynamic graphs from those static stats.
So if anybody feels like playing with it, go ahead!

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikidata queries

2013-03-28 Thread Petr Onderka
How will be the queries formatted? Do I understand it correctly that a
QueryConcept is a JSON object?
Have you considered using something more in line with the format of
action=query queries?
Though I guess what you need is much more complicated and trying to
fit it into the action=query model wouldn't end well.

Petr Onderka
[[en:User:Svick]]

2013/3/28 Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de:
 We have a first write up of how we plan to support queries in Wikidata.
 Comments on our errors and requests for clarifications are more than
 welcome.

 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/Queries

 Cheers,
 Denny

 P.S.: unfortunately, no easter eggs inside.

 --
 Project director Wikidata
 Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
 Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de

 Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
 Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
 der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
 Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Try out MediaWiki Vagrant

2013-03-28 Thread Željko Filipin
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 I hope you check it out, and that you find it useful. Feedback would be
 much appreciated.


I have tried it at two Mac machines, it worked without any problems.

Željko
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Try out MediaWiki Vagrant

2013-03-28 Thread Bartosz Dziewoński

I tried it out on my Windows XP, and on `vagrant up` it promptly took all the 
1.5 GB of free space on disk C: and crashed (I purposefully keep my system 
partition small).

Is it possible to make it write the big files (the downloaded OS image and the 
virtual disk) into somewhere else than %userprofile%? I know VirtualBox can do 
that, as I have two VMs set up in this way.

--
Matma Rex

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Try out MediaWiki Vagrant

2013-03-28 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
Ori, thanks for the great dev environment :)

As mentioned in another email, I would like to have the following added to
default vagrant installation. Having default dev environment would allow us
to quickly get new developers up to speed almost without
any walk-through steps.

* redirect from / to /w/index.php
* xdebug to debug from host's IDE
* unit testing frameworks, and maybe even some scripts to run php and other
unit tests
* easy way to add extensions - menu driven would be nice, or at least git
clone and add the required() :)
* SQL access - either phpMyAdmin, or routing SQL ports to host's tools, or
both, or ...
* reset script to quickly restart apache/memcached/etc  (is it possible
to do it from host?)
* Direct root access to the client's file system from the host (in windows
-- \\precsie64\root\...)
* php update.php - is it possible to do it from host?  vagrant mwupdate
?

Thanks!!!


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.comwrote:

 I tried it out on my Windows XP, and on `vagrant up` it promptly took all
 the 1.5 GB of free space on disk C: and crashed (I purposefully keep my
 system partition small).

 Is it possible to make it write the big files (the downloaded OS image and
 the virtual disk) into somewhere else than %userprofile%? I know VirtualBox
 can do that, as I have two VMs set up in this way.

 --
 Matma Rex


 __**_
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Juliusz Gonera
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't know if that is actually good for anything :) but it would
 surely allow you to bypass cookie restrictions everywhere (for api's
 only). On the other way, I think we could just think of using some
 different technology than cookies to avoid mess with DNS


Adding just one domain doesn't seem like a big mess. I'm not sure when
we'll have a different technology other than cookies and I'm also afraid
that the workaround I described in the RFC won't work forever (if it does
work now, we'll know in a few days).

-- 
Juliusz
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Juliusz Gonera
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Seb35 seb35wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:

 A small issue in this proposition: sub-subdomains are not currently
 covered by the https certificate.


That would make only commons.api.wikipedia.org not work, but not
commons.wikipedia.org, right?

-- 
Juliusz
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Alternative domains for Commons

2013-03-28 Thread Seb35
Le Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:45:03 +0100, Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org  
a écrit:

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Seb35 seb35wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:


A small issue in this proposition: sub-subdomains are not currently
covered by the https certificate.


That would make only commons.api.wikipedia.org not work, but not
commons.wikipedia.org, right?


Yes.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Try out MediaWiki Vagrant

2013-03-28 Thread Ori Livneh


On Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:

 As mentioned in another email, I would like to have the following added to
 default vagrant installation. Having default dev environment would allow us
 to quickly get new developers up to speed almost without
 any walk-through steps.
  
 * redirect from / to /w/index.php
This is already set up. Is it not working for you?  
 * xdebug to debug from host's IDE

Installation of Xdebug is also already in, but not the IDE integration and URL 
trigger that you described to me the other day. I'll look into it. Tracking 
here: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
 * unit testing frameworks, and maybe even some scripts to run php and other
 unit tests

phpunit is also already installed. A helper script for running unit tests from 
the host environment would make sense.  
 * easy way to add extensions - menu driven would be nice, or at least git
 clone and add the required() :)

Punting on this one. It'll be a headache to maintain. Adding the require_once( 
.. ) call by hand is not too much work, no?  
 * SQL access - either phpMyAdmin, or routing SQL ports to host's tools, or
 both, or ...

 * reset script to quickly restart apache/memcached/etc (is it possible
 to do it from host?)

OK, can do.
 * Direct root access to the client's file system from the host (in windows
 -- \\precsie64\root\...)
 * php update.php - is it possible to do it from host? vagrant mwupdate
 ?

I'll look into making this easier.  

Vagrant provides hooks for plug-ins to add subcommands. Having a MediaWiki 
plug-in that allows a set of maintenance tasks to be run from the host sounds 
promising.

Tracking here: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46676

 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com 
 (mailto:matma@gmail.com)wrote:
  
  I tried it out on my Windows XP, and on `vagrant up` it promptly took all
  the 1.5 GB of free space on disk C: and crashed (I purposefully keep my
  system partition small).
   
  Is it possible to make it write the big files (the downloaded OS image and
  the virtual disk) into somewhere else than %userprofile%? I know VirtualBox
  can do that, as I have two VMs set up in this way.
  

Yes, this should be handled better. Thanks for the report. Tracking it here: 
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46675  



--
Ori Livneh





___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l