[WISPA] service in gulfport

2005-11-10 Thread danlist
Does anybody provide service in Gulfport?

Thanks

Dan

 1 Factory Shops Blvd
 Suite #450
 Gulfport, Mississippi 39503

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/165 - Release Date: 11/09/2005
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread RickG
If teh cell companies can do it, anyone can.

On 11/9/05, A. Huppenthal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Its true, Internet is an option.There are lots of people in the valley
 here that never want it.
 As to billing, paying per bit won't happen except for the Cellular
 companys who have per minute everything in place as it is.
 You'd think that since telephone service was flat rate some time ago,
 you couldn't reverse the trend, but ah ha! If you
 have something like cellular for Internet you can. The demand needs to
 overcome the view that you are being screwed
 if you pay per bit. If its obvious you are being screwed something needs
 to be done.. Suspending that belief that's the result of compelling
 applications and great marketing and some peer pressure. Do you think 8
 to 18 year olds really give a damn if Dad is paying per bit or flat
 rate.. no way. IM just has to be there, all the time, and so does
 picture and video transfer.. ;-)

 The core sales center for cellular isn't you any longer, its 8 to 18
 year olds. Its a bit different for fixed wireless.


 Tom DeReggi wrote:

  Without electricity, you are blind or get heat stroke.
  Without gas (propaine /natural), you freeze to death.
  Without water, you dehydrate or get desease (no bathing).
  All above things considered necessities, up there with food.
  People could die without them.
 
  TV, Phone, Internet on the other hand are luxeries, things that people
  rely on, but would survive if they did without.  I've never seen
  someone die from TV/Phone/Internet with drawal, although you never
  know it could happen. There is however financial benefits of having
  those luxeries, and there are general safety benefits of having the
  above.
 
  The way to tell the difference is to see how much someone will pay for
  something. Leave someone in the desert heat for a week, and then see
  how much they'll pay you for the last bottle of water.  If its a
  matter of life or death they'd pay thousands.  When someones
  electricity goes out in the winter, they won't even flinch at going to
  a hotel for a night or two at $150 a night.
 
  But then tell a consumer you have a $300 setup fee for their
  residential Broadband wireless service and see how quick they hang up
  the phone on you! If a consumer doesn't put a high value on a service,
  then it is NOT a necessity.  NObody has ever refused to pay $150 a
  month for an electric bill, why are they so resistent to pay $50 a
  month for a residential Internet service?  Because it is NOT a
  necessity.  There is a big difference, it may however become a
  COMMODITY. Something that someone expects to have cheap and widely
  available. But a commodity is in no way a necessity.
 
  So I in know believe INternet/phone/and TV should be in the same
  catagory as necessities like utilities.. But I do believe that the
  world increases its standards as life and technology progresses. Why
  settle for the minimum? People WILL demand things basic communication
  rights, like TV/Phone/Internet.  Not because its a necessity, but
  becaues its a luxury that no one should be without based on the high
  standard of living that the US life has made possible. A simple
  question is asked, why shouldn't every person in America have complete
  communications? What barrier could possibly justify not being able to
  accomplish it?  Withholding something that is easilly deliverable is
  just plain evil.  The technology is here today to offer universal
  broadband and communications, so people will not except not having it.
 
  So yes Charles I agree, in 5-10 years, people will expect to have it
  as a commodity, wether it is a necessity such as heat,water,electric,
  is irrelevant.
 
  My answer is the battle to to prove to the world it is NOT a
  commodity. It is a service that has value and a service worth paying
  for.  I still remember when I paid $500 a month for my ISDN for a two
  man office.  I believe broadband is worth as much if not more than a
  phone or a television service.  Even if someone is poor or on welfare,
  they are likely to have a phone, cell phone, or TV, and they are
  finding a way to justify paying for it, even though it costs
  substantially more than Broadband for residential consumers. Why
  should broadband be less valuable?  Because there was competition at
  one time, that drove the price down. Something there wasn't much of in
  local phone or Cable TV services.
 
  So my view is if governement want to fight for universal broadband for
  the rich/poor, urban/ rural, no problem, just don't devalue the
  service that has value.
 
  I remember when my wife was on bed rest and she had to wear a monitor.
  There was no problem for the world to justify (insurance approved) why
  a remote monitoring system, was allowed to charge several hundred
  dollars a day, for the monitor service.  How would that person be able
  to do the monitoring without a phone or an internet connection?
  Wouldn't you argue 

Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread RickG
True, they are too separate points but are related in that it will
take both commodity status and total necessity before it can be
treated as such.

On 11/9/05, Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, RickG wrote:

 I agree with George. Internet access is practically a necessity
 now, especially for businesses. It wont be much longer and
 broadband will be expected in order to do any kind of business. It
 may not be for survival of your life, but certainly it will hurt
 you financially.

 Sounds like you agree with what I said, too.  However, whether it is
 a necessity or not does not make it a commodity item that has to
 be available in ALL locations like water/gas/electricity. (Sewer
 services do not extend into the county areas in most cases, for
 example.)

 --
 Butch Evans
 BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
 Bernie, MO
 Mikrotik Certified Consultant
 (http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
-RickG
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread Butch Evans
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, George wrote:

Ok Butch. Lets take a test. Go to your office and your home and
unplug all your landlines and turn off all the cell phones for 1
week and lets see what happens.

OUCH!  I am cold and hungry.  Turning pale.  My hair is falling out
(prolly not related. :-) ).

Any rate, If I did this, I would not be happy and I couldn't work,
but I WOULD NOT die. Not sure what this test would prove...

It is not really a fair test anyway.  This would be the equivalent
of removing the wrenches from a mechanic.  These tools are directly
part of what I do for a living.  They are not incidental to HELP me
do my job, they ARE my job (so to speak).

Perhaps I am missing your point.  These things (telephone and
internet access) are both very important both from a cultural AND a
business standpoint.  I agree with you (and others) that both are a
very important part of American life.  Am I missing something else?
Do you suggest that everyone who is an American should (by some
unwritten rule) have a right to these things?  Even if they can't
afford it, should we come up with a way to subsidize it?  I am not
baiting you, I am simply not seeing the point you are trying to
make.

-- 
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Cisco

2005-11-10 Thread Butch Evans
I am seeing some errors on a client's network and I need some
expertise.  Here is the output from the Cisco:
cdg-gate#sh interfaces FastEthernet0/0

FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is AmdFE, address is 0030.8558.8060 (bia 0030.8558.8060)
  Internet address is 12.145.235.254/23
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 00:00:04, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of show interface counters 00:01:28
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
  5 minute input rate 745000 bits/sec, 100 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 102000 bits/sec, 85 packets/sec
 9064 packets input, 9837705 bytes
 Received 1 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
 0 watchdog
 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
 8003 packets output, 1130789 bytes, 0 underruns(0/0/0)
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 19 deferred
 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Note the deferred output packets.  Can anyone provide some input
on what would cause this?  The T1 side is not seeing any errors at
all.  Network is:

T1 - Cisco - SonicWall - Switch

The SonicWall is configured as a bridge and has been a source of
good income for me (lots of time fixing it).  I suspect the
problem is the SonicWall, but not certain.  I plan to bypass the
SonicWall, but wanted some input from those more experienced with
Cisco as to what I may be able to do to see what is happening on the
network from the Cisco's perspective.  Thanks for your help.

-- 
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread Charles Wu
Butch,

Technically, none of the necessities are ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL to survival

If you didn't have electricity, you *could* light a candle
If you didn't have heat in the winter, you *could* go chop firewood in the
forest
If there was no running water, you *could* bring a bucket to the nearby lake
If there were no grocery stores, you *could* go shoot a rabbit

-Charles

---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge


On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, George wrote:

Ok Butch. Lets take a test. Go to your office and your home and unplug 
all your landlines and turn off all the cell phones for 1 week and lets 
see what happens.

OUCH!  I am cold and hungry.  Turning pale.  My hair is falling out (prolly
not related. :-) ).

Any rate, If I did this, I would not be happy and I couldn't work, but I
WOULD NOT die. Not sure what this test would prove...

It is not really a fair test anyway.  This would be the equivalent of
removing the wrenches from a mechanic.  These tools are directly part of
what I do for a living.  They are not incidental to HELP me do my job, they
ARE my job (so to speak).

Perhaps I am missing your point.  These things (telephone and internet
access) are both very important both from a cultural AND a business
standpoint.  I agree with you (and others) that both are a very important
part of American life.  Am I missing something else? Do you suggest that
everyone who is an American should (by some unwritten rule) have a right
to these things?  Even if they can't afford it, should we come up with a way
to subsidize it?  I am not baiting you, I am simply not seeing the point
you are trying to make.

-- 
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread Ray Jean
Well, as far what is necessary and what is not... Being a woman.. I'm 
watching and taking care of 2 networks in 2 different cities 70 miles 
apart... using the internet and phone.. Landline. Washing clothes, cleaning 
house, cooking a meal. Watching TV. Had a T-1 go out in the furthest city.. 
None of this is possible without electricity.. So a candle, shooting a 
rabbit, ugh!.. but they are 2 deer about 25 feet from my kitchen window. 
Guess I could shoot one of them.


I maybe missing everyone's point.. but people will pay for what they get.. 
As long as you give them what they want.. without too much Hassel..

My 2cents worth!
Jean
- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge



On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, George wrote:


Ok Butch. Lets take a test. Go to your office and your home and
unplug all your landlines and turn off all the cell phones for 1
week and lets see what happens.


OUCH!  I am cold and hungry.  Turning pale.  My hair is falling out
(prolly not related. :-) ).

Any rate, If I did this, I would not be happy and I couldn't work,
but I WOULD NOT die. Not sure what this test would prove...

It is not really a fair test anyway.  This would be the equivalent
of removing the wrenches from a mechanic.  These tools are directly
part of what I do for a living.  They are not incidental to HELP me
do my job, they ARE my job (so to speak).

Perhaps I am missing your point.  These things (telephone and
internet access) are both very important both from a cultural AND a
business standpoint.  I agree with you (and others) that both are a
very important part of American life.  Am I missing something else?
Do you suggest that everyone who is an American should (by some
unwritten rule) have a right to these things?  Even if they can't
afford it, should we come up with a way to subsidize it?  I am not
baiting you, I am simply not seeing the point you are trying to
make.

--
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/165 - Release Date: 11/9/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Cisco

2005-11-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
I'm guessing here but I think that one end or the other is overloaded and 
there's a backup of traffic.  The Cisco then holds the data for x period of 
time and it either gets through or it dies there


But I'm certainly no expert.  I'm trying to remember the kinds of things 
that happened back when we were still running a 56k data link to the net and 
had it stuffed completely full.


Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Wispa List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 9:11 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Cisco



I am seeing some errors on a client's network and I need some
expertise.  Here is the output from the Cisco:
cdg-gate#sh interfaces FastEthernet0/0

FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
 Hardware is AmdFE, address is 0030.8558.8060 (bia 0030.8558.8060)
 Internet address is 12.145.235.254/23
 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
 Keepalive set (10 sec)
 Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
 ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
 Last input 00:00:04, output 00:00:00, output hang never
 Last clearing of show interface counters 00:01:28
 Queueing strategy: fifo
 Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
 5 minute input rate 745000 bits/sec, 100 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 102000 bits/sec, 85 packets/sec
9064 packets input, 9837705 bytes
Received 1 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
8003 packets output, 1130789 bytes, 0 underruns(0/0/0)
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 19 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Note the deferred output packets.  Can anyone provide some input
on what would cause this?  The T1 side is not seeing any errors at
all.  Network is:

T1 - Cisco - SonicWall - Switch

The SonicWall is configured as a bridge and has been a source of
good income for me (lots of time fixing it).  I suspect the
problem is the SonicWall, but not certain.  I plan to bypass the
SonicWall, but wanted some input from those more experienced with
Cisco as to what I may be able to do to see what is happening on the
network from the Cisco's perspective.  Thanks for your help.

--
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

2005-11-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
It's not ip based (which is good when your system is down :-).  This is 
pager based.


When we get some extra funds this is the kind of gear we'll put in.

http://www.nighthawksystems.com/

laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot


These are great units, its what we use also at our cell sites. You can get 
them for $250 for 8 port, in qty 5.

These are well worth it for cell sites.

What I'd like to see though is a sub-$100 unit for 1 or 2 port reboot 
device for client CPE side.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Profito [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot


Try this, all our towers have this installed, it even pings for an auto 
reboot, $300 is cheep !

http://www.corpsys.com/store/prodinfo.asp?number=EPCRvariation=aitem=3mitem=20

Chuck Profito
CV-ACCESS
- Original Message - 
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot



Thanks thats good to know. Since we don't run DHCP anywhere.
Based on that, probably only good as a home unit, thats behind a home 
gateway w/ DHCP.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Rick Harnish [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:59 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot



We have a couple of them in our office waiting to be deployed at tower
sites.  The web interface is crap, it won't allow you to put in a 
subnet and
default gateway.  You have to set it to get a DHCP address to get those 
key
routing numbers inserted.  I like the size and the price is right, I 
guess

for $80 you shouldn't expect many management features.

Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband  Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 4:04 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

http://www.apcc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=3

Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 5:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

Which model APC has Ethernet reboot for $80?

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: G.Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:37 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot



Realay control or AC?  Cause APC has a cheap ups that's has a Ethernet
port
for remote reboot ... $80

Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On

Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 12:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

Hi all.

I'm looking for an IP based remote reboot or relay controller.

It must be small, controlled via http or telnet, and be able to turn a
relay off or on remotely

Oh, before I forget, cheap, too!

Any ideas?


--
Blair Davis

AOL IM Screen Name --  Theory240

West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648

A division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/146 - Release Date: 
10/21/2005





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread Butch Evans
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Ray  Jean wrote:

electricity.. So a candle, shooting a rabbit, ugh!.. but they are 2
deer about 25 feet from my kitchen window.  Guess I could shoot one
of them.

:-)

I maybe missing everyone's point.. but people will pay for what
they get..  As long as you give them what they want.. without too
much Hassel..

I can't speak for anyone else, but MY point is this:

Internet access is becoming more and more necessary.  People are
more and more expecting things on the internet to be free (think
of peer to peer apps and how people talk about stealing music and
movies).  They, also, because of the RBOCs, are beginning to think
that anyone who charges a REASONABLE fee for internet service is
gouging.  This mentality is one that is not likely to be stopped.
I am simply doing what I can to impress on others in the same line
of work I am in, to think about what is happening and not to simply
accept this as fate (or whatever you want to call it).  I know that
if I were falling from a great height without a parachute, I would
at least flap my arms.  May not help, but it is all I can do.

My point in 2 words:  KEEP FLAPPING.

-- 
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

The real issue on this is natural vs. un-natural monopolies.

I can't find the article I read some years ago but here's the gist of it.

There's only so much room for things like water lines, gas lines, electric 
lines, telephone lines, streets, garbage cans etc.  Those PHYSICAL 
structures lend themselves nicely to monopolies.  We really don't need 15 
different electric lines running past our houses (though the case could be 
made as to why that may be a good thing).


Internet access, however, is a SERVICE not a thing.  There are multiple ways 
in which multiple providers can access customers (and vise verse) over 
EXISTING or unobtrusive distribution mechanisms.


To monopolize internet access would be like trying to monopolize movie 
theaters, hospitals, auto parts stores etc.


Here's a pretty good article I think (though I only took the time to scan 
it):

https://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_2_3.pdf

And for anyone that wants to dig deeper into it:
http://www.google.com/search?q=natural+vs.+unnatural+monopolyhl=enlr=

laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge



On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Charles Wu wrote:


Electricity, Gas and Water are billed on a usage basis

Competitive market pressures aside, why should Internet be any
different?


Charles,
I don't often find myself in total disagreement with your
statements.  I am on this point, however.  Well, maybe not total,
but close.  The RBOCs and cableops are working hard to commoditize
the internet connection.  There are efforts on the part of many
municipalities to do the same.  Your city is doing this now.  I am
not sure there is anything we can do to sway the tide that seems
to be driven partly by the RBOCs and others, but I don't agree that
internet access fits the same class of service as the utilities
you mentioned.

For example, electricity, gas and water are items that are needed
for basic survival in the city.  Granted, these services have not
always been available, but it is expected by all Americans that if
they move somewhere, they can get those services.  Most people would
not survive without these services.  Tell me how internet access
fits that description.

Internet access is something that is NOT required for basic
necessities.  It IS something that most businesses can't do without.
With that in mind, why do you compare it to these other utilities?
I will do ok if the internet access business dries up.  I provide
other services that don't require me to even sell internet access.
These services work over any high speed connection.  One business
feeds the other.

NOW, to answer your original question: I think the question is
framed wrong.  I don't see us EVER getting to the point where we,
the network operator, will be paying for transports with
origination fees or termination fees, as the telcos are doing
now.  Perhaps I missed the point of this conversation, as I have not
read all the posts, but I just don't believe it will ever get there.

--
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New Tower Installation - Need some help/recommendations

2005-11-10 Thread Richard Munoz
If I am reading the spec sheet correctly, for an 80' Rohn 45G tower, your 
guy anchors will be out 64' and your guy points on the tower will be at 35' 
high (73' guy wire) and 65' high (91' guy wire).  I don't know if moving the 
guy points (both on the tower and at your guy anchors) will reduce your wind 
loading capability.  Maybe someone else with more tower exp. can help out 
here.


All of the towers that we have installed have been with a flat base plate. 
Then again all of our towers (that we have built) have been 25G, except for 
one that was installed before I got here.  And I think they used a crane.


Are you going to put a top section?  If you do put a top section, keep in 
mind that if you need/want to go taller in the future, you have to take gear 
down if it is at the top.  We learned that the hard way. :-(


Don't forget your wire nuts.

-Richard M.

- Original Message - 
From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:18 PM
Subject: [WISPA] New Tower Installation - Need some help/recommendations



Hello all,

I'm getting ready to put up my first tower (finally found a place where 
there weren't any existing towers available) and would like to get some 
comments from others about whether I am doing the right things.


My goal is to mount a 2' PacWireless 5Ghz dish, a 3' PacWireless 5Ghz dish 
and 13db PacWireless H-pol Omni antenna at the 80 foot level.


The tower site used to have a very large radio tower on it, so the base 
and guy points are all still in place.  The base has a single pin in the 
center, and the guy anchors are 90' out at 120 degree intervals.


My intention is to put up a Rohn 45 equivalent tower - 8 sections and a 5' 
base section for a total of 85' of tower; two sets of guy points - one at 
40' and another at 80'.  The antennas will mount right above the guy 
wires.


Here are some of the questions that I have:

1)  Should I use a flat base or an angled base (single pin)  There is 
already a pin in place from the old tower, but I don't know whether it 
makes sense to use it or just put a flat base with new anchors in.


2)  Does it make sense to put a hinged base at the bottom, assemble the 
tower and raise it with a winch -- or should I use a gin pole to put it 
together?


3)  I have not ordered my tower pieces yet.  New costs look to be about 
$3200 for 8 10' sections, base, 2 guy brackets, 1000' of guy wire, guy 
wire ground kit and 6 turnbuckles.  Am I missing anything on this list? 
Does anyone have this sort of thing laying around that they would like to 
sell?  I'm just looking for some recommendations as to whether this is the 
right price range.


Thanks for your assistance guys!

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/166 - Release Date: 11/10/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge

2005-11-10 Thread Tom DeReggi

Good point George.

I did not consider emergency communication needs, in my thought.

But your point does strengthen, my opinion that broadband should not be 
undervalued.  If your ship was about to sink, and the coast guard needed to 
be immediately called, or INternet instant message sent, how much would you 
pay to be able to make that phone call, or communication, in a time of 
URGENT need, life or death situation? Is it appropriate to have 
communication systems that are NOT up to PAR, to handle these immediate 
emergency needs that consumers could have?  City providing a network to a 
million people for $10 a subscriber or for free, in an open access fassion, 
is not likely to deliver the reliabilty to meet the need of emergency 
response.  Thats one of the reasons Public safety organizations like POLICE 
have been allocated Licensed Spectrum worth billions given to them. 
Reliabilty and needs to be engineered, with realistic ideals.  For 
tehcnologies capabilty and support.The other question that applies is, 
how many options of communication are needed to fullfill that need?  There 
is a strong case for redundancy, such as MAC Dearman, has recently proven. 
and are those option necessary for the individual home? There is no doubt 
that broadband could save lives, as you just corrected me on the topic.  But 
what did the people do 20 years ago, when broadband did not exist? Or for 
that matter when phones did not exist?


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge



Tom DeReggi wrote:


TV, Phone, Internet on the other hand are luxeries, things that people 
rely on, but would survive if they did without.  I've never seen someone 
die from TV/Phone/Internet with drawal, although you never know it could 
happen.



Tom. You should rethink what you just said about you've never heard of 
anyone dying because of no phone or internet.


The phone absolutely has saved lives.

And people surely died that didn't get to one fast enough or could find 
one.


The internet on the other hand, I don't have to remind you that Mac and 
those hero wisp workers who bailed out people all across the gulf with 
voip and net sure proved that the net is more than a luxury.


As for tv, ok.


Sincerely

George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: 11/8/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New Tower Installation - Need some help/recommendations

2005-11-10 Thread Richard Munoz

These specs are for 70mph basic wind speed (no ice).

What do you need it to be rated for?

-Richard M.

If I am reading the spec sheet correctly, for an 80' Rohn 45G tower, your 
guy anchors will be out 64' and your guy points on the tower will be at 
35' high (73' guy wire) and 65' high (91' guy wire).  I don't know if 
moving the guy points (both on the tower and at your guy anchors) will 
reduce your wind loading capability.  Maybe someone else with more tower 
exp. can help out here.


All of the towers that we have installed have been with a flat base plate. 
Then again all of our towers (that we have built) have been 25G, except 
for one that was installed before I got here.  And I think they used a 
crane.


Are you going to put a top section?  If you do put a top section, keep in 
mind that if you need/want to go taller in the future, you have to take 
gear down if it is at the top.  We learned that the hard way. :-(


Don't forget your wire nuts.

-Richard M.

- Original Message - 
From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:18 PM
Subject: [WISPA] New Tower Installation - Need some help/recommendations



Hello all,

I'm getting ready to put up my first tower (finally found a place where 
there weren't any existing towers available) and would like to get some 
comments from others about whether I am doing the right things.


My goal is to mount a 2' PacWireless 5Ghz dish, a 3' PacWireless 5Ghz 
dish and 13db PacWireless H-pol Omni antenna at the 80 foot level.


The tower site used to have a very large radio tower on it, so the base 
and guy points are all still in place.  The base has a single pin in the 
center, and the guy anchors are 90' out at 120 degree intervals.


My intention is to put up a Rohn 45 equivalent tower - 8 sections and a 
5' base section for a total of 85' of tower; two sets of guy points - one 
at 40' and another at 80'.  The antennas will mount right above the guy 
wires.


Here are some of the questions that I have:

1)  Should I use a flat base or an angled base (single pin)  There is 
already a pin in place from the old tower, but I don't know whether it 
makes sense to use it or just put a flat base with new anchors in.


2)  Does it make sense to put a hinged base at the bottom, assemble the 
tower and raise it with a winch -- or should I use a gin pole to put it 
together?


3)  I have not ordered my tower pieces yet.  New costs look to be about 
$3200 for 8 10' sections, base, 2 guy brackets, 1000' of guy wire, guy 
wire ground kit and 6 turnbuckles.  Am I missing anything on this list? 
Does anyone have this sort of thing laying around that they would like to 
sell?  I'm just looking for some recommendations as to whether this is 
the right price range.


Thanks for your assistance guys!

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/166 - Release Date: 
11/10/2005





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/166 - Release Date: 11/10/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

2005-11-10 Thread Tom DeReggi

A bit pricey for $695.


Internal power supply, 48V, 1A. 4 Watts max.


Unclear on load capabilty. 48Vx1amp=48W.

Not to useful, when it integrates power and ethernet, if it doesn't support 
passing VLAN/large packets.


The added AC reboot recepticle was a good idea.  Without it, it prevents the 
Reboot device to be used to reboot a PC based router. What good is it to 
save on reboot device cost, if two are needed, one for DC one for AC? So it 
solves that problem.


However, for a unit to support end user CPEs, bothAC and DC support really 
not needed. ONe or the other will work.  The only requirement is for it to 
cost under a $100!  It would be nice if the reboot device supported two 
devices. That would then allow rebooting both home gateway and CPE radio.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot



Blair

I think this will do what you need tell them Tony front Demarc sent you:
http://www.remotedatacom.com/pages/KABU.html

Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-244-9068 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

Well, I guess there is no reasonably priced unit out there that will do 
what

I need and fit in the space allowed.

The comments on the list have shown me that there may be a demand for a 
unit
like this.  I have decided to build my own.  I have also decided to make 
it

available to others who might need it.

As part of this process, I am posting the planned specs and I am asking 
for

additional ideas for features.

Specs:

Hardware

10baseT ethernet port for communication.
1-4 pair of RJ-45 pass thru jacks with lines 4 and 5 switched.
Each pass thru jack pair is independently switched
Relay(s) rated for up to 48VDC at 3A
Power available monitor for switched jack(s) Unit powered via 5-12VDC

Software

Setup and controlled via web browser or telnet Static IP with subnet and
gateway Programmable ping monitor for each relay Selectable 'keep alive' 
/

'I am here' ping Adjustable power off delay Adjustable power off time

Several things I am undecided about adding are:

Email notification of ping failure
Email notification of power available status change Programmable, 
repeatable

by time and date switching
   (this requires a real time clock and/or automatic synchronization with 
a

time server and might increase the costs)

One thing I will not add:

Switching 110/220AC.  This would add many requirements for testing and
considerable legal liability.

The price should be under $100 each.

Questions?

Comments?

Interest?

--

Blair Davis
West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648










--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: 11/8/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

2005-11-10 Thread Joel White
Marlon and all,

I just wanted to pass on the below E-mail that we received regarding the
Nighthawk NH100, and special limited time pricing. This may be a good time for
you to spend less on Margaritas and a little on the remote reboot;0

I don't often get to add much value to this list, but hopefully I can this time.

Best Regards,

Joel


Sent: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:08:46 EST
Subject: NIGHTHAWK PILOT PROGRAM OFFER

Nighthawk Systems, Inc is offering a pilot program with the CEO 700 and CEO
700H's. Customers will receive a minimum of 10 units to use for a pilot
program not to exceed 45 days. After 30 - 45 days the customer(s) can decide
to purchase the units or send them back to Nighthawk Systems, Inc. In most
cases we can ship units within 7 days.

 

We are also offering the NH100's at $185/unit for those customers that take
delivery prior to December 31st. Our normal price on the NH100's is $225 -
$325. NH100's are great applications for rebooting servers and routers in any
data or telecom room along with rebooting SCADA systems.

 

The EA1 which is used for alerting Volunteer Fire Houses and Fire Fighters is
also being discounted.

 

Check out all of our products @: www.nighthawksystems.com.

 

Best regards,

 

Jeff Bell

Vice President

Nighthawk Systems, Inc.

8200 East Pacific Place

Ste 204

Denver, CO 80231

720-470-4090 


Message: 1
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:36:45 -0800
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=response

It's not ip based (which is good when your system is down :-).  This is pager
based.

When we get some extra funds this is the kind of gear we'll put in.

http://www.nighthawksystems.com/

laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



--
NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New Tower Installation - Need some help/recommendations

2005-11-10 Thread noc.kl.terranova.net
You need guys every 30 feet. Add a nine foot top and ten to twelve feet of 
heavy walled mast to mount your omni to. Leave the backhaul dishes on the 
tower proper.


Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:


Hello all,

I'm getting ready to put up my first tower (finally found a place where 
there weren't any existing towers available) and would like to get some 
comments from others about whether I am doing the right things.


My goal is to mount a 2' PacWireless 5Ghz dish, a 3' PacWireless 5Ghz 
dish and 13db PacWireless H-pol Omni antenna at the 80 foot level.


The tower site used to have a very large radio tower on it, so the base 
and guy points are all still in place.  The base has a single pin in the 
center, and the guy anchors are 90' out at 120 degree intervals.


My intention is to put up a Rohn 45 equivalent tower - 8 sections and a 
5' base section for a total of 85' of tower; two sets of guy points - 
one at 40' and another at 80'.  The antennas will mount right above the 
guy wires.


Here are some of the questions that I have:

1)  Should I use a flat base or an angled base (single pin)  There is 
already a pin in place from the old tower, but I don't know whether it 
makes sense to use it or just put a flat base with new anchors in.


2)  Does it make sense to put a hinged base at the bottom, assemble the 
tower and raise it with a winch -- or should I use a gin pole to put it 
together?


3)  I have not ordered my tower pieces yet.  New costs look to be about 
$3200 for 8 10' sections, base, 2 guy brackets, 1000' of guy wire, guy 
wire ground kit and 6 turnbuckles.  Am I missing anything on this list?  
Does anyone have this sort of thing laying around that they would like 
to sell?  I'm just looking for some recommendations as to whether this 
is the right price range.


Thanks for your assistance guys!

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Its almost Friday...

2005-11-10 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
For your Thursday afternoon listening pleasure, our latest obnoxious 
radio commercial.   Enjoy!


http://www.thelar.com/mp3/vista.wav

Matt Larsen
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot

2005-11-10 Thread Tom DeReggi
The nighthawk units are NICE units, and can easily be justified cost wise 
for MTU unattended sites, but their are still two deficiencies.


1) They are MANUAL reboot devices.  I can't automate the process to detect 
failure and auto-reboot easilly.


   Well actually I could partially, if I tried hard enough, but an 
auto-ping, that actually tests THROUGH the CPE operating on the CPE side is 
a better method. The purpose is not only to prevent truck rolls, but 
optimally to reduce phone tech support resources as well, not to mention 
repair time.  Auto-ping can get the detection/repair time down to 1 minute, 
often hiding from the customer that a down time insodent ever occurred in 
the first place.


2) Nighthawks need to be pre-programed for the user's area (I think zip 
code, but much narrower than area code) before it ships, and it can not be 
changed after the fact.  My network covers MANY zip codes in the three 
states I serve.  That means stocking an awful lot of reboot devices that you 
may never need, or ordering them individually which could mean a seperate 
trip might be needed to install the reboot device, in order to not delay 
scheduled installtions.


If I could stock 10 or so, and change the usage area of the device myself on 
the fly, well it would strongly increase its value as a product.


$185, is justifyable for Unattended MTU building closets that serve multiple 
clients, or really far away sites, but its still a little high for wide 
scale usage for every CPE location.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 1:49 PM
Subject: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot



Marlon and all,

I just wanted to pass on the below E-mail that we received regarding the
Nighthawk NH100, and special limited time pricing. This may be a good time 
for

you to spend less on Margaritas and a little on the remote reboot;0

I don't often get to add much value to this list, but hopefully I can this 
time.


Best Regards,

Joel


Sent: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:08:46 EST
Subject: NIGHTHAWK PILOT PROGRAM OFFER

Nighthawk Systems, Inc is offering a pilot program with the CEO 700 and 
CEO

700H's. Customers will receive a minimum of 10 units to use for a pilot
program not to exceed 45 days. After 30 - 45 days the customer(s) can 
decide

to purchase the units or send them back to Nighthawk Systems, Inc. In most
cases we can ship units within 7 days.



We are also offering the NH100's at $185/unit for those customers that 
take

delivery prior to December 31st. Our normal price on the NH100's is $225 -
$325. NH100's are great applications for rebooting servers and routers in 
any

data or telecom room along with rebooting SCADA systems.



The EA1 which is used for alerting Volunteer Fire Houses and Fire Fighters 
is

also being discounted.



Check out all of our products @: www.nighthawksystems.com.



Best regards,



Jeff Bell

Vice President

Nighthawk Systems, Inc.

8200 East Pacific Place

Ste 204

Denver, CO 80231

720-470-4090


Message: 1
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:36:45 -0800
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based Remote Reboot
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=response

It's not ip based (which is good when your system is down :-).  This is 
pager

based.

When we get some extra funds this is the kind of gear we'll put in.

http://www.nighthawksystems.com/

laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



--
NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/165 - Release Date: 11/9/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Cisco

2005-11-10 Thread Russ Kreigh
Butch -

Double check that the sonicwall is running 100-full, hard-code it if you
can. You should never see deferred transmissions on a 100-full connection.
Also check your ethernet cables.

You also might try putting a switch in between the Cisco and Sonicwall if
you can't hard-code it.

Russ Kreigh
Network Engineer
OnlyInternet.Net Broadband  Wireless
Supernova Technologies
Office: (800) 363-0989
Direct: (260) 827-2486
Fax:(260) 824-9624
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oibw.net




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Wispa List
Subject: [WISPA] Cisco

I am seeing some errors on a client's network and I need some expertise.
Here is the output from the Cisco:
cdg-gate#sh interfaces FastEthernet0/0

FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is AmdFE, address is 0030.8558.8060 (bia 0030.8558.8060)
  Internet address is 12.145.235.254/23
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 00:00:04, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of show interface counters 00:01:28
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
  5 minute input rate 745000 bits/sec, 100 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 102000 bits/sec, 85 packets/sec
 9064 packets input, 9837705 bytes
 Received 1 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
 0 watchdog
 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
 8003 packets output, 1130789 bytes, 0 underruns(0/0/0)
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 19 deferred
 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Note the deferred output packets.  Can anyone provide some input on what
would cause this?  The T1 side is not seeing any errors at all.  Network is:

T1 - Cisco - SonicWall - Switch

The SonicWall is configured as a bridge and has been a source of good income
for me (lots of time fixing it).  I suspect the problem is the SonicWall,
but not certain.  I plan to bypass the SonicWall, but wanted some input from
those more experienced with Cisco as to what I may be able to do to see what
is happening on the network from the Cisco's perspective.  Thanks for your
help.

--
Butch Evans
BPS Networks  http://www.bpsnetworks.com/ Bernie, MO Mikrotik Certified
Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] service in Ft. Lauderdale

2005-11-10 Thread Peter R.

Prospect called me today looking for a Wireless T1 to his location in Fort
Lauderdale.
If you can hit zip code  4 (Oakland Park, FL) please contact me.

Thank you. 


Regards,

Peter 
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist 
We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
813.963.5884 
http://4isps.com 


ISP Expo in Tampa, Dec. 9  10

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Broadband Wireless Returns to Proven Direct Sales Model for U.S. Market

2005-11-10 Thread Brian Rohrbacher




This mean cheaper products? :)

Shayne Rose wrote:

  
  
  Trango Broadband Wireless
Returns to Proven Direct Sales Model for U.S. Market 
  
  Decision reflects company objective of getting closer to end
customers in their home market, and availability of increased resources
at its U.S. headquarters 
  
  SAN DIEGO, CA  November 9, 2005  Trango Broadband Wireless,
an industry leader in fixed-wireless broadband connectivity solutions,
announced today that it is transitioning back to direct sales for the
U.S. market. "Returning to a direct sales model for the U.S. is clearly
the right choice for the company," said Colin Boyd, vice president of
sales for Trango Broadband Wireless. "One of the great things about
Trango is that we are always open to better ways of doing business. For
the U.S. market there are a myriad of distribution options available to
us, and we have tested several. But it became crystal clear to us at
the recent ISP-CON show, where Trango gathered for a day with many of
its customers, that one thing they need from their manufacturing
partners is close coordination on issues ranging from product and
feature requirements, to joint marketing programs, to even lobbying
initiatives to ensure that the voice of the fixed broadband wireless
industry is heard by government and consumers. We have a great
productreal broadband accessand working closely together is the best
thing for Trango and our U.S. customers." 
  
Todd Easterling, vice president of marketing said, "This decision is in
lockstep with our new branding strategy whereby we are going to
basically scream from the rooftops what differentiates Trango from our
competitors. In the next couple months you will see a new face on the
company. Frankly, Trango, to a great extent, has been the quiet giant
in the wireless industrya group of modest and talented engineers going
about the introduction of extremely innovative products, but rarely
communicating the advantages of these products as well as we should.
The bottom line is that Trango is virtually the only end-to-end fixed
broadband wireless manufacturer in the industry. Not many customers
know that we actually own a world-class factory and design and build
every radio we sellwhether it is point-to-point backhauls or
point-to-multipoint mass subscriber networks," added Easterling. "For
our U.S. customers, this is a huge advantage. You can't get closer to
the product than buying directly from the factory that tailors that
product exactly to your needs. And likewise, Trango can't get closer to
the U.S. market than selling directly to the people who install and use
our technology every day." 
  
Trango Broadband Wireless has also added to its sales and marketing
team recently, which has increased its capability to serve its home
market directly. The company hired a new vice president of marketing,
vice president of sales, CFO, director of finance, and doubled its
engineering department. It is also adding to its applications
engineering, quality control and product management departments. 
  
"We are more than capable of not only returning to the direct sales
model in the U.S., but also building on the programs that previously
played a critical role in the company's high growth," Mr. Boyd said.
"The products practically sell themselves. That's not the challenge.
The goal of this initiative is to work hand-in-hand with the U.S.
customers who actually deploy wireless networks in the U.S., right in
our backyard  the boots on the ground' input that drives winning
products and winning sales programs." Mr. Boyd added that this change
only impacts U.S. distribution, where Trango's headquarters and
regional sales people are based. 
  
  
  
  
  Shayne
Rose
  National
Sales Manager
  
  
  Trango
Broadband
  a
division of Trango Systems, Inc.
  15070 Ave of Science,
Suite 200
  San Diego, CA 92128
  Office:
858-653-3900x272
  Fax: 858-683-2124
e-Fax
  Mobile: 858-335-2245
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  =
  NOTE: This email may contain information that is confidential in
nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email
and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.
  =
  
  
  
  
  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/166 - Release Date: 11/10/2005
  



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] short link

2005-11-10 Thread Dylan Oliver
Hi,

I need to make a 2.3 km link from a data center to a tower. Can anyone recommend Free Space Optics for this job? 

The Lightpointe Strata sounds like it might work with a claimed range
of 5 km, but I wonder how overblown this marketing pitch is:

The FlightStrata 100 XA (Extended Availability) is a breakthrough in
outdoor wireless point-to-point solutions. Based on LightPointe's
patented DualPathT architecture, the FlightStrata 100 XA blends a high
bandwidth optical link and an unlicensed radio frequency (RF) backup
with intelligent seamless switching to provide Fast Ethernet throughput
and 99.999% uptime in all weather conditions at distances up to 5 km
99.999% uptime in heavy fog? How far? Certainly not 2.3 km .. ?

Otherwise, why can't I find any 24 GHz equipment that does more than 200 Mbps? 

This article (http://infoworld.com/article/03/06/16/HNhispeed_1.html)
says that Dragonwave was dreaming up a Gbps radio back in '03 .. where
is it?

Also, any links to info on leasing 18, 23, and 26 GHz on a link-by-link basis?

Thanks,-- Dylan OliverPrimaverity, LLC
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New Tower Installation - Check out these towers!

2005-11-10 Thread Brian Rohrbacher

Just came across these.  They look pretty neat.

http://www.isotruss.com/wifi-towers.htm

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14765077

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8672279?hilite=isotruss

If I get a chance I am going to see what a 90 footer costs.  If anyone 
else calls before I do, post it here so we can all see the price on 
these bad boys.


Brian

Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:


Hello all,

I'm getting ready to put up my first tower (finally found a place 
where there weren't any existing towers available) and would like to 
get some comments from others about whether I am doing the right things.


My goal is to mount a 2' PacWireless 5Ghz dish, a 3' PacWireless 5Ghz 
dish and 13db PacWireless H-pol Omni antenna at the 80 foot level.


The tower site used to have a very large radio tower on it, so the 
base and guy points are all still in place.  The base has a single pin 
in the center, and the guy anchors are 90' out at 120 degree intervals.


My intention is to put up a Rohn 45 equivalent tower - 8 sections and 
a 5' base section for a total of 85' of tower; two sets of guy points 
- one at 40' and another at 80'.  The antennas will mount right above 
the guy wires.


Here are some of the questions that I have:

1)  Should I use a flat base or an angled base (single pin)  There is 
already a pin in place from the old tower, but I don't know whether it 
makes sense to use it or just put a flat base with new anchors in.


2)  Does it make sense to put a hinged base at the bottom, assemble 
the tower and raise it with a winch -- or should I use a gin pole to 
put it together?


3)  I have not ordered my tower pieces yet.  New costs look to be 
about $3200 for 8 10' sections, base, 2 guy brackets, 1000' of guy 
wire, guy wire ground kit and 6 turnbuckles.  Am I missing anything on 
this list?  Does anyone have this sort of thing laying around that 
they would like to sell?  I'm just looking for some recommendations as 
to whether this is the right price range.


Thanks for your assistance guys!

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/