Re: [WISPA] Voltage regulator
I have been curious if anyone has ever tried an automotive 24vdc regulator, like Volvos and some tractors? They seem to be much more substantially built then something like the Tycons I have... On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote: I use DCDC regulator and din rail kit Meanwell SD-50B-24 Meanwell DRL-02 Meanwell DRP-03 Three M3x6 screws and two M4x6 screws Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.com wrote: Use a meanwell RSD series power supply. RSD-100B-24 takes from 16.8-31.2VDC in and converts it to a clean 24V out. The 100 means 100W. There are other wattages. (24V/4.8A is 100W, more than enough for 8-10 UBNT radios). B means '24v in'. There are other ranges, not all are available in all wattages. The RSD handles inrush better than the SD versions. There are din rail and wall mount brackets available for this power supply. -forrest On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:27 PM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote: ** I need a means to regulate the voltage coming out of the Solar Controller I need a constant 24 volts for Tranzeo and Ubiquiti radios. I now have between 25 and 29 volts. Any suggestions? NGL If you can read this Thank A Teacher. And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- -- SCS Clay Stewart CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., DBA Stewart Computer Services 434.263.6363 O 434.942.6510 C cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com “We Keep You Up and Running” Wireless Broadband Programming Network Services inline: flag.gif___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question
That is the chipset actually... so whats that mean exactly. You said no support in 5.x That doesn't mean I'm going to have to suffer with 6.1 does it I guess at least there is hope in future without swapping out a bunch of hardware once 6x is working good.. Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 From: can...@believewireless.net p...@believewireless.net Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 6:55 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question Check the ethernet chipset, Make sure it isn't the Intel 82583V chipset. This won't support jumbo frames in v5.X. On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote: HI Scott, I bet you if you dropped a quick email with this question to Brian at Baltic networks you will get your answer. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz From: Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 4:07:08 PM Subject: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question I know these are fairly popular routers so I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue before Mikrotik v5.24 or 5.25 - go to ethernet interface and open an interface, I can't increase the MTU size greater then the default 1500. Some of the Maxxwave routers I can. No rhyme or reason between them I can tell - some just allow the MTU change some don't. Not sure if this is MT fubar or some other issue with the device. Anyone? Thanks Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question
Jumbo frames are supported on that chipset in the latest Intel driver updates so it is definitely possible to get it working. I don't know about what is bundled into each Mikrotik update but I would imagine you will not have to swap out any hardware, just wait for them to bundle a newer Intel driver. Maybe it is in 6.x already. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Carullo Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 7:42 PM To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question That is the chipset actually... so whats that mean exactly. You said no support in 5.x That doesn't mean I'm going to have to suffer with 6.1 does it I guess at least there is hope in future without swapping out a bunch of hardware once 6x is working good.. Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 http://www.flhsi.com/files/emaillogo.jpg _ From: can...@believewireless.net mailto:can...@believewireless.net p...@believewireless.net mailto:p...@believewireless.net Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 6:55 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question Check the ethernet chipset, Make sure it isn't the Intel 82583V chipset. This won't support jumbo frames in v5.X. On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote: HI Scott, I bet you if you dropped a quick email with this question to Brian at Baltic networks you will get your answer. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz _ From: Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com To: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 4:07:08 PM Subject: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question I know these are fairly popular routers so I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue before Mikrotik v5.24 or 5.25 - go to ethernet interface and open an interface, I can't increase the MTU size greater then the default 1500. Some of the Maxxwave routers I can. No rhyme or reason between them I can tell - some just allow the MTU change some don't. Not sure if this is MT fubar or some other issue with the device. Anyone? Thanks Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org mailto:Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org mailto:Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
[WISPA] Advertising IP space for Business Customers
What is the general consensus in regards to advertising AS number space for business/non-profit client that has their own allocation of space from ARIN? Let's say the customer has service from you as a backup and wants to transition to you as a primary and continue to use their own IP space. I am looking in to the feasibility of meeting this request and what, if any, fees to quote to the customer. Any advice would be appreciated. Bobby ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Advertising IP space for Business Customers
It's just a slightly different configuration and usually carriers either don't charge or charge something minimal like $50/mth or a setup fee. Regards, Chuck On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Bobby Burrow brbur...@gmail.com wrote: What is the general consensus in regards to advertising AS number space for business/non-profit client that has their own allocation of space from ARIN? Let's say the customer has service from you as a backup and wants to transition to you as a primary and continue to use their own IP space. I am looking in to the feasibility of meeting this request and what, if any, fees to quote to the customer. Any advice would be appreciated. Bobby ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Voltage regulator
As already noted there are a number of sources for regulators. The meanwell mentioned by Forrest is probably the best choice for this case but I'd like to add http://www.zahninc.com/ to the list. Well built and fairly inexpensive in the step-up,step-downat lower wattages. I have used the DCDC48/24/280 - 280 watt 48 V to 24 V @ $99 DCDC24/48/260 - 260 watt 24 V to 48 V @ $99 andDCDC6350-S-ADJ 50 Amp Voltage Regulator monster to Regulate 48 - 60 Volts. ($407) They have a wide range of devices that they design and manufacture. Most have a degree of adjustability to tweak to your requirements. David Zahn's designs are conservative so they will do everything that they say. The downside is that you have to convince David Zahn that your not going to burn up his device before he will sell the first one to you. (know how much current you need and leave some room for startup surge current) As a small guy I try to support the other small guys like David Zahn when the device and price fits. Larry ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote: I need a means to regulate the voltage coming out of the Solar Controller I need a constant 24 volts for Tranzeo and Ubiquiti radios. I now have between 25 and 29 volts. Any suggestions? NGL If you can read this Thank A Teacher. And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question
I'm sure the manufacture can help you with that, hit them up! Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of Learn RouterOS- Second Edition Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net -- Skype: linktechs -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com -- 900Mhz -- LTE -- 3G -- 3.65 -- TV Whitespace On 7/13/2013 3:07 PM, Scott Carullo wrote: I know these are fairly popular routers so I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue before Mikrotik v5.24 or 5.25 - go to ethernet interface and open an interface, I can't increase the MTU size greater then the default 1500. Some of the Maxxwave routers I can. No rhyme or reason between them I can tell - some just allow the MTU change some don't. Not sure if this is MT fubar or some other issue with the device. Anyone? Thanks Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Advertising IP space for Business Customers
We typically do it for free as people who request this type of service typically spend more then your $60/month type client. Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com From: Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.commailto:ch...@shelbybb.com Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:38 AM To: bo...@burrow.commailto:bo...@burrow.com bo...@burrow.commailto:bo...@burrow.com, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising IP space for Business Customers It's just a slightly different configuration and usually carriers either don't charge or charge something minimal like $50/mth or a setup fee. Regards, Chuck On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Bobby Burrow brbur...@gmail.commailto:brbur...@gmail.com wrote: What is the general consensus in regards to advertising AS number space for business/non-profit client that has their own allocation of space from ARIN? Let's say the customer has service from you as a backup and wants to transition to you as a primary and continue to use their own IP space. I am looking in to the feasibility of meeting this request and what, if any, fees to quote to the customer. Any advice would be appreciated. Bobby ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range
I'd like to hear a price... - Original Message - From: Matt Hoppes To: WISPA General List Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:53 PM Subject: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Just got this today: This sounds interesting anyone have any thoughts? 900MHz always gets the propagation advertisement, but my experience has been that while it propagates better, the gain limitations and size of reasonable antennas make it unusable. Original Message Subject: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:16:18 +0300 From: Asa Yanai a...@runcom.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; __ Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products: v*New 4G/WIMAX Solution at 900MHZ Frequency Range * *Combines long Range , High Capacity and low susceptibility to Interference * ·Long Range - due to 900MHz propagation ·Non Line of Sight – due to 900MHZ propagation and OFDMA technology (unique to 4G) ·High Capacity – due to 4G/WIMAX high spectral efficiency (4 bits/sec/Hz) and MIMO utilization ·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization ·Base Stations and Outdoor CPE's available now v*New Enhanced WIMAX Base Station with Radius Interface. * ·IEEE.802.16e compliant ·Enables stand alone connection to the NOC without the need of ASN Gateway ·For additional features please refer to the attached brochure For more information please contact : */Asa Yanai/* RUNCOM USA V.P Business Development Marketing USA Cell: 917 848 3753 Email: a...@runcom.com mailto:a...@runcom.com or */Israel Koffman/* VP Marketing and Sales USA Mobile Phone: 1-646-530-1502 Skype: Israel.Koffman FAX:+972-3-9528805 Websites: www.runcom.com http://www.runcom.com/ -- ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
[WISPA] Alvarion Demise?
http://www.cellular-news.com/story/60986.php Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range
·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization How do they figure this? I think it should be Low susceptibility due to SELF interference. 900 in my area, California Central Valley east of the Bay Area, is almost useless for 900 as the power companies have put in smart meters Tim CV-Access, Inc. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Just got this today: This sounds interesting anyone have any thoughts? 900MHz always gets the propagation advertisement, but my experience has been that while it propagates better, the gain limitations and size of reasonable antennas make it unusable. Original Message Subject: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:16:18 +0300 From: Asa Yanai a...@runcom.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; __ Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products: v*New 4G/WIMAX Solution at 900MHZ Frequency Range * *Combines long Range , High Capacity and low susceptibility to Interference * ·Long Range - due to 900MHz propagation ·Non Line of Sight – due to 900MHZ propagation and OFDMA technology (unique to 4G) ·High Capacity – due to 4G/WIMAX high spectral efficiency (4 bits/sec/Hz) and MIMO utilization ·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization ·Base Stations and Outdoor CPE's available now v*New Enhanced WIMAX Base Station with Radius Interface. * ·IEEE.802.16e compliant ·Enables stand alone connection to the NOC without the need of ASN Gateway ·For additional features please refer to the attached brochure For more information please contact : */Asa Yanai/* RUNCOM USA V.P Business Development Marketing USA Cell: 917 848 3753 Email: a...@runcom.com mailto:a...@runcom.com or */Israel Koffman/* VP Marketing and Sales USA Mobile Phone: 1-646-530-1502 Skype: Israel.Koffman FAX:+972-3-9528805 Websites: www.runcom.com http://www.runcom.com/ ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Alvarion Demise?
Didn't they partner with Tranzeo. Seems like a bad move on both their parts. Phil On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:39 PM, lakeland lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: http://www.cellular-news.com/story/60986.php Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range
Wouldn't the fact that 2.5GHz is licensed minimize the chance that there would be outside interference? I don't know, I'm asking. Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Jul 16, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Tim Kerns t...@cv-access.com wrote: ·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization How do they figure this? I think it should be Low susceptibility due to SELF interference. 900 in my area, California Central Valley east of the Bay Area, is almost useless for 900 as the power companies have put in smart meters Tim CV-Access, Inc. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Just got this today: This sounds interesting anyone have any thoughts? 900MHz always gets the propagation advertisement, but my experience has been that while it propagates better, the gain limitations and size of reasonable antennas make it unusable. Original Message Subject: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:16:18 +0300 From: Asa Yanai a...@runcom.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; __ Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products: v*New 4G/WIMAX Solution at 900MHZ Frequency Range * *Combines long Range , High Capacity and low susceptibility to Interference * ·Long Range - due to 900MHz propagation ·Non Line of Sight – due to 900MHZ propagation and OFDMA technology (unique to 4G) ·High Capacity – due to 4G/WIMAX high spectral efficiency (4 bits/sec/Hz) and MIMO utilization ·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization ·Base Stations and Outdoor CPE's available now v*New Enhanced WIMAX Base Station with Radius Interface. * ·IEEE.802.16e compliant ·Enables stand alone connection to the NOC without the need of ASN Gateway ·For additional features please refer to the attached brochure For more information please contact : */Asa Yanai/* RUNCOM USA V.P Business Development Marketing USA Cell: 917 848 3753 Email: a...@runcom.com mailto:a...@runcom.com or */Israel Koffman/* VP Marketing and Sales USA Mobile Phone: 1-646-530-1502 Skype: Israel.Koffman FAX:+972-3-9528805 Websites: www.runcom.com http://www.runcom.com/ ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question
It is in 6 but I'm not planning on rolling out 6 yet because my small testing has concluded there are issues with 6 and I'm not ready to bleed on this right now. 5.25 works just fine for me I'll buy more routers to replace existing tower ones and when 6 is stable the others can be used again Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 From: Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:30 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question Jumbo frames are supported on that chipset in the latest Intel driver updates so it is definitely possible to get it working. I don't know about what is bundled into each Mikrotik update but I would imagine you will not have to swap out any hardware, just wait for them to bundle a newer Intel driver. Maybe it is in 6.x already. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Carullo Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 7:42 PM To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question That is the chipset actually... so whats that mean exactly. You said no support in 5.x That doesn't mean I'm going to have to suffer with 6.1 does it I guess at least there is hope in future without swapping out a bunch of hardware once 6x is working good.. Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 From: can...@believewireless.net p...@believewireless.net Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 6:55 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question Check the ethernet chipset, Make sure it isn't the Intel 82583V chipset. This won't support jumbo frames in v5.X. On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote: HI Scott, I bet you if you dropped a quick email with this question to Brian at Baltic networks you will get your answer. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz From: Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 4:07:08 PM Subject: [WISPA] Maxxwave router MTU problem / question I know these are fairly popular routers so I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue before Mikrotik v5.24 or 5.25 - go to ethernet interface and open an interface, I can't increase the MTU size greater then the default 1500. Some of the Maxxwave routers I can. No rhyme or reason between them I can tell - some just allow the MTU change some don't. Not sure if this is MT fubar or some other issue with the device. Anyone? Thanks Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range
Their product announcement is 900Mhz. Regards, Chuck On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists jeffl...@att.netwrote: Wouldn't the fact that 2.5GHz is licensed minimize the chance that there would be outside interference? I don't know, I'm asking. Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Jul 16, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Tim Kerns t...@cv-access.com wrote: ·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization How do they figure this? I think it should be Low susceptibility due to SELF interference. 900 in my area, California Central Valley east of the Bay Area, is almost useless for 900 as the power companies have put in smart meters Tim CV-Access, Inc. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Fwd: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Just got this today: This sounds interesting anyone have any thoughts? 900MHz always gets the propagation advertisement, but my experience has been that while it propagates better, the gain limitations and size of reasonable antennas make it unusable. Original Message Subject: Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products 900MHZ Frequency Range Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:16:18 +0300 From: Asa Yanai a...@runcom.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; __ Runcom Announce 2 NEW 4G/WIMAX exciting products: v*New 4G/WIMAX Solution at 900MHZ Frequency Range * *Combines long Range , High Capacity and low susceptibility to Interference * ·Long Range - due to 900MHz propagation ·Non Line of Sight – due to 900MHZ propagation and OFDMA technology (unique to 4G) ·High Capacity – due to 4G/WIMAX high spectral efficiency (4 bits/sec/Hz) and MIMO utilization ·Low susceptibility to Interference – due to GPS synchronization ·Base Stations and Outdoor CPE's available now v*New Enhanced WIMAX Base Station with Radius Interface. * ·IEEE.802.16e compliant ·Enables stand alone connection to the NOC without the need of ASN Gateway ·For additional features please refer to the attached brochure For more information please contact : */Asa Yanai/* RUNCOM USA V.P Business Development Marketing USA Cell: 917 848 3753 Email: a...@runcom.com mailto:a...@runcom.com or */Israel Koffman/* VP Marketing and Sales USA Mobile Phone: 1-646-530-1502 Skype: Israel.Koffman FAX:+972-3-9528805 Websites: www.runcom.com http://www.runcom.com/ ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Alvarion Demise?
You are likely thinking of Aperto - it just happened to be that the main contact person here for Alvarion moved to them, and I believe recently moved back to Alvarion, so it is possible to have confused the two. If anyone is needs Alvarion-compatible WiMAX CPE get in touch with me off-line: we can supply under reasonable MOQ. Daniel Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote .. Didn't they partner with Tranzeo. Seems like a bad move on both their parts. Phil On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:39 PM, lakeland lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: http://www.cellular-news.com/story/60986.php Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
