Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Last day to file CBRS Comments is today. Please file if you have not already done so.

[alex phillips]

Everyone,

WISPA has invested a great deal of time and effort on this one.  More than
any other effort to date.   Write your comments using the below information
but also tell your story about why your small business is important to the
area you service.  Share a story from a customer if you have one that
distinguishes you from what was there.   Show the FCC the importance of
Small business to this entire ecosystem.



*Alex Phillips*
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
*540-908-3993*
Member WISPA.org
#Rev18


On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Mark Radabaugh  wrote:

> WISPA Members,
>
> We are in the middle of one of the most important fights in the history of
> our industry.  *We need every member (operators, vendors, service
> providers) to submit comments to the FCC*.  More background and an
> outline to help you cover all the bases are in Steve Coran’s email below.
>
> Please take 30 minutes today and put together a letter to the FCC on
> CBRS.  If you need assistance, or want help reviewing a draft, contact me,
> Mark Radabaugh, or Steve Coran off list and we’ll help you.
>
> We have also developed a website that will enable you to see the
> difference between census tracts (the current proposal for allocating PALs)
> and PEAS.  Instructions for accessing that website are below.
>
> If you would prefer to have a KMZ file showing PEA's that you can use, you
> can download it here:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/y5b1zf1mtm5b0v2/FCC_PEAs_website.kmz?dl=0
>
>
>
> *THIS IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT *
>
>
>
>
>
> *Citizens Broadband Radio Service*
>
> *GN Docket No. 17-258*
>
>
>
> *Suggestions for Filing Comments regarding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking*
>
> *Deadline: Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 11:59 pm Eastern Time*
>
>
>
> *Background*
>
>
>
> On October 24, 2017, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
> (NPRM) that would fundamentally change the Citizens Broadband Radio Service
> (CBRS), which includes the 3550-3650 MHz band and the existing 3650-3700
> MHz band.  WISPA will be filing extensive Comments opposing many of the
> proposed rule changes, and we believe it is very important for individual
> members – WISPs, manufacturers, vendors, etc. – to also file Comments.
>
>
>
> *Summary of Current Rules That Will Be Changed If WISPs Do Not Comment*
>
>
>
> The FCC adopted rules in April 2015 to establish the CBRS band.  The band
> employs a three-tier spectrum access model.  *Incumbent Access* (earth
> stations and military) that must always be protected from interference; 
> *Priority
> Access*, which will be auctioned by the FCC according to census tracts
> and must protect incumbents; and *General Authorized Access* (GAA), a
> “license by rule” service that must protect Incumbent and Priority Access
> use.  The FCC allocated up to 70 megahertz for Priority Access Licenses
> (PALs) and the remaining 80 megahertz for GAA use.  The FCC also will allow
> GAA use opportunistically when and where Priority Access Licenses (PALs)
> are not in use.  The model will be governed by a Spectrum Access System
> (SAS) that will enforce the three-tier approach.
>
>
>
> In addition to fixed wireless service, the CBRS band is viewed as an
> “innovation band” to enable other business models such as Industrial
> Internet of Things, private networks, venues (e.g., airports, arenas,
> shopping malls), neutral host networks and others.
>
>
>
> *Summary of Proposed Changes to the Rules Sought by the Mobile Industry*
>
>
>
> Here is a link to the proposed regulatory action that the FCC is
> considering:
> *https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-17-134A1.pdf*
> <https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-17-134A1.pdf>*)*
>
> *PLEASE BE SURE TO READ Paragraphs 9-27, which are relevant to the
> proposals discussed below  *
>
>
>
> The FCC, at the request of the mobile industry, is proposing changes to
> the PAL rules so they are friendlier to national mobile carriers.  If
> adopted, the proposed rules would effectively foreclose small companies
> that wish to acquire protected spectrum for small areas and create a
> “5G-only” band available only to the large mobile wireless providers.  The
> specific proposals are as follows:
>
> Ø  *Conduct PAL auctions based on Partial Economic Areas (PEAs) *or other
> geographic areas that are larger than census tracts, such as counties.
> There are 416 PEAs and more than 74,000 census tracts.  Census tracts are
> optimized at a population of ~4,000.
>
> Ø  *Extend Priority Access License (PAL) terms from 3 years to 10 years
> and add a “renewal expectancy”* that could make PALs essentially
> perpetual.
>
>

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] CBRS comments are due Thursday, December 28, 2017. GET THIS DONE TODAY (before drinking all the eggnog)!

[alex phillips]

Business WISP
industry has been a significant reason for so much innovation in Broadband
Technologies where Manufactures looked to US to see how we were trying to
solve problems and made products that met those needs.

So to summarize what I am saying here:

#1 Small business is important and why
#2 The FCC should not be picking winners and losers in the internet economy
#3 The Small Business has and continues to play a role in Innovation in the
larger broadband industry.

Share your stories, make sure our voice is heard.  Don't wait, start
working on this today.



*Alex Phillips*
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
*540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
Member WISPA.org
#Rev18


On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Coran, Steve 
 wrote:

>
>
> *Citizens Broadband Radio Service*
>
> *GN Docket No. 17-258*
>
>
>
> *Suggestions for Filing Comments regarding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking*
>
> *Deadline: Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 11:59 pm Eastern Time*
>
>
>
> *Background*
>
>
>
> On October 24, 2017, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
> (NPRM) that would fundamentally change the Citizens Broadband Radio Service
> (CBRS), which includes the 3550-3650 MHz band and the existing 3650-3700
> MHz band.  WISPA will be filing extensive Comments opposing many of the
> proposed rule changes, and we believe it is very important for individual
> members – WISPs, manufacturers, vendors, etc. – to also file Comments.
>
>
>
> *Summary of Current Rules That Will Be Changed If WISPs Do Not Comment*
>
>
>
> The FCC adopted rules in April 2015 to establish the CBRS band.  The band
> employs a three-tier spectrum access model.  *Incumbent Access* (earth
> stations and military) that must always be protected from interference; 
> *Priority
> Access*, which will be auctioned by the FCC according to census tracts
> and must protect incumbents; and *General Authorized Access* (GAA), a
> “license by rule” service that must protect Incumbent and Priority Access
> use.  The FCC allocated up to 70 megahertz for Priority Access Licenses
> (PALs) and the remaining 80 megahertz for GAA use.  The FCC also will allow
> GAA use opportunistically when and where Priority Access Licenses (PALs)
> are not in use.  The model will be governed by a Spectrum Access System
> (SAS) that will enforce the three-tier approach.
>
>
>
> In addition to fixed wireless service, the CBRS band is viewed as an
> “innovation band” to enable other business models such as Industrial
> Internet of Things, private networks, venues (e.g., airports, arenas,
> shopping malls), neutral host networks and others.
>
>
>
> *Summary of Proposed Changes to the Rules Sought by the Mobile Industry*
>
>
>
> Here is a link to the proposed regulatory action that the FCC is
> considering:
> *https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-17-134A1.pdf*
> <https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-17-134A1.pdf>*)*
>
> *PLEASE BE SURE TO READ Paragraphs 9-27, which are relevant to the
> proposals discussed below  *
>
>
>
> The FCC, at the request of the mobile industry, is proposing changes to
> the PAL rules so they are friendlier to national mobile carriers.  If
> adopted, the proposed rules would effectively foreclose small companies
> that wish to acquire protected spectrum for small areas and create a
> “5G-only” band available only to the large mobile wireless providers.  The
> specific proposals are as follows:
>
> Ø  *Conduct PAL auctions based on Partial Economic Areas (PEAs) *or other
> geographic areas that are larger than census tracts, such as counties.
> There are 416 PEAs and more than 74,000 census tracts.  Census tracts are
> optimized at a population of ~4,000.
>
> Ø  *Extend Priority Access License (PAL) terms from 3 years to 10 years
> and add a “renewal expectancy”* that could make PALs essentially
> perpetual.
>
>
>
> *These proposed rule changes would make the cost of acquiring protected
> PALs through auction significantly higher, pricing out many small would-be
> bidders and essentially ensuring that the large mobile wireless carriers
> have exclusive access to the spectrum for an indefinite period of time over
> a large geographic area.  Smaller providers, even if they had the means to
> outbid the large carriers, would be forced to acquire large-area licenses
> that are likely much larger than the targeted areas WISPs would want to
> serve.*
>
>
>
> *Guidelines*
>
>
>
> · Please review the NPRM
>
> · You can also review WISPA’s recent comments in meetings with
> Chairman Pai and Commissioner O’Rielly, which are attached to this email
>
> · File comments unique to your

Re: [WISPA] Selling ISP

[Alex Perez]

Cameron,

On the flip-side, finding a traditional bank to finance the purchase of a WISP 
may be fraught with its own set of challenges, which don’t necessarily have 
anything to do with the quality of the business, its operations, *or* the 
knowledge of the purchaser.

If anyone can refer others to a business-oriented bank which they know has 
successfully financed WISP purchases in the past, that would be a great asset 
to the community. I suspect smaller, more-focused lending institutions would be 
more amenable to this sort of thing.

Thoughts?

On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Cameron Crum  wrote:

> Doug,
> 
> The problem I see with that is that you will most likely have to take the 
> other party to court to enforce the terms of your agreement if one of the 
> terms is breached. It could take months or even years to get a final 
> judgement at which time there may be nothing left. This may be good advice 
> for a non-wisp business, but in the fast paced world of broadband, customers 
> will likely flee before a resolution is reached. If the buyer is left 
> insolvent, you are left with nothing, and may be on the hook for all your  
> own legal fees. I talked to three different business attorneys and they all 
> told me to run from any seller financed deal regardless of who the buyer was. 
> Again, if the buyer can't get financing on their own, are they a good buyer? 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Hass, Douglas A.  wrote:
> Of course!  You have to have a willing seller and buyer to start.  My point 
> is that setting preconditions before you get started (as a buyer or as a 
> seller) unnecessarily limits what you ultimately would be able to do.  Don’t 
> take options off the table until you have a specific deal to consider.  Then 
> is the time to say “I’m only taking cash” or “I’ll finance, but only with X, 
> Y, and Z terms that protect me.”
> 
>  
> 
> Doug
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:53 PM
> 
> 
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Selling ISP
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Depends on how bad you want to sell ...we don't always want to buy. 
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
> 
> - Reply message -
> From: "Hass, Douglas A." 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Subject: [WISPA] Selling ISP
> Date: Wed, Mar 19, 2014 2:08 PM
> 
>  
> 
> Cameron—
> 
>  
> 
> There’s lots of ways to structure the deal so that you’re protected, even if 
> the buyer is a complete imbecile and even if the buyer doesn’t have cash up 
> front.  If you want to sell or if you want to buy, don’t let the all-cash 
> restriction prevent you from making a deal.  If you end up in court chasing 
> payments from the buyer, then you likely didn’t draft your agreement 
> carefully enough given your tolerance for risk (of course, your due diligence 
> should be telling you whether the buyer is an imbecile, and that information 
> should inform what kind of deal you’re willing to accept).
> 
>  
> 
> To categorically reject buyers who don’t have 100% cash to hand you at 
> closing might mean leaving money on the table or more flexible terms from 
> someone who can put together a more attractive end package.  In that sense, 
> it works like selling real estate.  The all-cash offer isn’t always your best 
> one.
> 
>  
> 
> To Randy’s point--Jab has undergone a major shakeup at the top.  Many of the 
> senior executive staff have departed in the last few months.  That might 
> account for some of the quietness.  I don’t have any inside information, just 
> what I learned trying to round up potential panelists and speakers for 
> WISPAmerica.
> 
>  
> 
> Doug
> 
>  
> 
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Cameron Crum
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:45 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Selling ISP
> 
>  
> 
> The seller is not a bank. Why should they take on all the risk? What happens 
> if the buyer is a complete imbecile and runs the network into the ground and 
> defaults on payments? Now you are in court suing for money you will most 
> likely never see, and even if you retake possession of the network, it may be 
> in shambles or most of your customers have left. We walked away from a couple 
> of buyers who would not pony up the cash. I'd say as one who sold a wisp, if 
> the buyer can't afford it, or can't arrange their own financing, you don't 
> want to sell. 
> 
>  
> 
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Mike Hammett  
> wrote:
> 
> There's many more buyers out there.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
>  
> 
> From: "Randy Cosby" 
> 
> 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:00:34 AM
> 
> 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Selling ISP
> 
> Is anyone actually buying right now?  I haven't heard much about the big 
> buyer (Jab) la

Re: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic attached

[Alex Perez]

Doesn’t look the same:

http://www.gdsatcom.com/Broadband%20Antennas/PDFs/ptm1.pdf

On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181) 
 wrote:

> I wonder if that’s one of the old Gabriel multi sector units?  I think they 
> called it the M-beam.
>  
> marlon
>  
>  
> From: Gino Villarini
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 6:30 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic attached
>  
> Yes its dwnld from FB… it appears that the lower radios are feeding 2 small 
> UBNT sector inside the big sector enclosure,  by the positioning of the nuts 
> on the lower half of the Sector it seems like the big sector has been 
> modified… frankentenna
>  
>  
>  
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com  
> @aeronetpr
>  
>  
>  
> From: Mike Hammett 
> Reply-To: WISPA General List 
> Date: Sunday, March 16, 2014 9:27 AM
> To: WISPA General List 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic attached
>  
> At the bottom of the sector it seem sto have the model number information, 
> but the version I got doesn't let me zoom in enough. Judging by the filename, 
> is this a download off of FaceBook?
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> From: "Gino Villarini" 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:19:30 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] 8x8 antenna for ubnt?? pic attached
> 
> I think one of the many local wisps popping here are getting very "creative"
>  
> Anyone can ID this sector? Im thinking its a Mobile Carrier antenna that they 
> are reusing… but what band?
>  
>  
>  
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com  
> @aeronetpr
>  
>  
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DC FCC TV White Space

[Alex Perez]

What sort of TVWS issues are to be discussed, specifically?

On Mar 14, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Cameron Camp  wrote:

> Through a strange series of events, I’m headed to DC next week to meet with 
> FCC staff regarding TVWS issues. I’m tag teaming with CompTIA who arranged 
> the meetings (along with another rural broadband provider from Kentucky) with:
> 
> Renee Gregory (Chairman Wheeler)
> 
> David Goldman (Commissioner Rosenworcel)
> 
> Erin McGrath (Commissioner O'Reilly)
> 
> Matthew Berry and Brendan Carr (Commissioner Pai)
> 
> I have put together some bullet points, but wanted to get an unprompted sense 
> from the folks on this list what I should be mentioning while I’m there. How 
> far can we get, what questions should we asking and what is a practical 
> expecation for what can be accomplished still before FCC makes the decision?
> 
> Best,
> Cameron Camp
> IVDataCenter.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU

[Alex Onciu]

Hi Edward,
Adam is right. In order to have "SU to SU" direct communication you need
to enable Unicast Relaying and (optional) Broadcast/Multicast Relaying
on the AU.
Below is a quote from the manual related to Unicast Relaying:

4.2.6.4.6 Unicast Relaying (AU only)
The Unicast Relaying option enables selecting whether the unit performs
unicast relaying. When the Unicast Relaying parameter is enabled,
unicast packets originating from devices on the wireless link can be
transmitted back to the wireless link devices. If disabled, these
packets are not sent to the wireless
link even if they are intended for devices on the wireless link. Disable
the Unicast Relaying parameter only if all unicast messages from the
wireless link are certain to be directed to the local wired LAN.
The default selection is Enable.

If you have a more complex scenario maybe you want to change settings
also for the VLAN Relaying.

You can find detailed info about all the setting in the official manual.
If you don't have it let me know and I'll send it to you.

Alex 
--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:31:13 -0500
From: "Adam Greene" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Message-ID: <013801cf16b5$6faec4d0$4f0c4e70$@webjogger.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Edward, I think this is what you may be looking for:

 

On the AU:

 

5 - Advanced Configuration

4 - Bridge Parameters

4 - Broadcast/Multicast Relaying AND 5 - Unicast Relaying

 

Adam

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Edward Spoon
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 4:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU

 

Yes, I am trying to get Mikrotiks behind 2 different SU's associated to
the
same AP to talk to each other. Unicast didn't do it and I can't find any
"MAC forwarding" settings. Will see if renumbering is an option and try
that
next.

 

Thanks

 




 

 

 

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Matt Hoppes mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com> > wrote:

Oh... sorry I thought we were talking about one SU talking to the other
while both were connected to the same AU.

Yeah, I don't know of anyway to make an SU talk to an SU direct.



Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312  

On 1/20/14, 3:22 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
> At one point they had a "cell extender" that acted as a repeater, but
that
was an AU and SU merged into a single NEMA box. I know of no way to
connect
SU to SU directly without an AU in the middle. The caveat is that I was
never an engineer, so maybe there was some super secret agent setting
for
which I had no knowledge. I doubt it though, otherwise they'd no have
built
the extender.
>
> Patrick Leary
>   M 727.501.3735  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> ]
On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:19 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU
>
> H, I thought I recalled that you could turn that off?  Or maybe it
was
you have to assign a different subnet IP to each device so they talk
through
the head router.
>
>
> Matt Hoppes
> Director of Information Technology
> Indigo Wireless
> +1 (570) 723-7312  
>
> On 1/20/14, 3:15 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
>> Edward, from my Alvarion days, I know of no way to enable CPE to CPE
connection.
>>
>> Patrick Leary
>>M 727.501.3735  
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> ]
>> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 2:28 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU
>>
>> It is, but it's been way too long, I don't recall where the setting
is.
>>
>>
>> Matt Hoppes
>> Director of Information Technology
>> Indigo Wireless
>> +1 (570) 723-7312  
>>
>> On 1/20/14, 2:10 PM, Edward Spoon wrote:
>>> Seems like there is a filter preventing SU to SU communication on
the
>>> same AP. I know Trango's had this and had an option to enable or
>>> disable. Anyone familiar with where this setting would be in the
>>> Alvarion setup, if it is configurable at all?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __

Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Hey Patrick
Its called MAC forwarding

Good to hear from you
Alex



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

On Jan 20, 2014 3:49 PM, Patrick Leary  wrote:
Yes, that can be done and commonly was. I do not recall the exact setting.

Patrick Leary
 M 727.501.3735






-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU

Oh... sorry I thought we were talking about one SU talking to the other while 
both were connected to the same AU.

Yeah, I don't know of anyway to make an SU talk to an SU direct.


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 1/20/14, 3:22 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
> At one point they had a "cell extender" that acted as a repeater, but that 
> was an AU and SU merged into a single NEMA box. I know of no way to connect 
> SU to SU directly without an AU in the middle. The caveat is that I was never 
> an engineer, so maybe there was some super secret agent setting for which I 
> had no knowledge. I doubt it though, otherwise they'd no have built the 
> extender.
>
> Patrick Leary
>   M 727.501.3735
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:19 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU
>
> H, I thought I recalled that you could turn that off?  Or maybe it was 
> you have to assign a different subnet IP to each device so they talk through 
> the head router.
>
>
> Matt Hoppes
> Director of Information Technology
> Indigo Wireless
> +1 (570) 723-7312
>
> On 1/20/14, 3:15 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
>> Edward, from my Alvarion days, I know of no way to enable CPE to CPE 
>> connection.
>>
>> Patrick Leary
>>M 727.501.3735
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 2:28 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL SU to SU
>>
>> It is, but it's been way too long, I don't recall where the setting is.
>>
>>
>> Matt Hoppes
>> Director of Information Technology
>> Indigo Wireless
>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>
>> On 1/20/14, 2:10 PM, Edward Spoon wrote:
>>> Seems like there is a filter preventing SU to SU communication on
>>> the same AP. I know Trango's had this and had an option to enable or
>>> disable. Anyone familiar with where this setting would be in the
>>> Alvarion setup, if it is configurable at all?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>> *
>> ** This footnote confirms that this email message has
>> been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, 
>> vandals & computer viruses.
>> *
>> *
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>> *
>> ** This footnote confirms that this email message has
>> been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious
>> code, vandals & computer viruses.
>> *
>> *
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> **
> ** This footnote conf

Re: [WISPA] Advice Needed on 200 Mbps FDX Radios

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Ruben
We have not updated this data sheet in a while, it specs out our older ODU. 
With new ODU you can go to maximum modem capacity 56MHz at 128QAM. As long as 
as long as link budget permits you will get full bandwidth with no degradation 
over distance. I believe you can get 2xSTM1 channels at full modem capacity

Alex



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

On Jan 7, 2014 10:11 PM, Rubens Kuhl  wrote:

As specified in http://www.axxcelera.com/product_item_detail.php?id=3050:


  *   Capacity Options Ethernet: Up to 100Mbps full duplex plus 2 E1/T1 wayside

200 Mbps aggregate == 200 Mbps Half-Duplex, while the original poster stated a 
200 Mbps Full-Duplex requirement.


Rubens



On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Freylekhman, Alex 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>> wrote:

Ruben,
We have a product called AB Full Access II . One of the very few FD-FDD radios 
left on the market. It s available in 5GHz band with high power transmitter 
which will help you to save antenna size.

You can get 200mbps quite easy with that as Ethernet, TDM or fiber. I believe 
it will do the job for you

Thanks
Alex




Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>

On Jan 7, 2014 8:46 PM, Rubens Kuhl 
mailto:rube...@gmail.com>> wrote:



On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Ian Framson 
mailto:i...@tradeshowinternet.com>> wrote:
Hi Wisps,

We are looking for a pair of radios that can do 200 Mbps FDX over 11 miles 
(real world, not manufacturer's theoretical marketing promises). We are looking 
at using an unlicensed link (most likely 5 GHz) due to the time constraints, 
although we're open to suggestions.

The make/model we were considering was Motorola PTP650 with 450 Mbps upgrade 
license.  We are not wed to Motorola, however. The cost seems to be the 
limiting factor at this point.

Another WISP I spoke with mentioned Bridgewave TD60 might be 1 possibility.

Your thoughts?


UBNT AirFiber 5/5U in 5.8 GHz will be an option when it becomes available. 
AirFiber 24 GHz is said to provide a full-duplex capacity of 250 Mbps @ 12.5 
miles(http://www.ubnt.com/airlink/), but that gives very little room for fade 
margin, if any. If you can't wait for AF5, you could buy AF24 now, and then 
replace those with AF5s later in the year.


Rubens



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Advice Needed on 200 Mbps FDX Radios

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Ruben,
We have a product called AB Full Access II . One of the very few FD-FDD radios 
left on the market. It s available in 5GHz band with high power transmitter 
which will help you to save antenna size.

You can get 200mbps quite easy with that as Ethernet, TDM or fiber. I believe 
it will do the job for you

Thanks
Alex




Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

On Jan 7, 2014 8:46 PM, Rubens Kuhl  wrote:



On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Ian Framson 
mailto:i...@tradeshowinternet.com>> wrote:
Hi Wisps,

We are looking for a pair of radios that can do 200 Mbps FDX over 11 miles 
(real world, not manufacturer's theoretical marketing promises). We are looking 
at using an unlicensed link (most likely 5 GHz) due to the time constraints, 
although we're open to suggestions.

The make/model we were considering was Motorola PTP650 with 450 Mbps upgrade 
license.  We are not wed to Motorola, however. The cost seems to be the 
limiting factor at this point.

Another WISP I spoke with mentioned Bridgewave TD60 might be 1 possibility.

Your thoughts?


UBNT AirFiber 5/5U in 5.8 GHz will be an option when it becomes available. 
AirFiber 24 GHz is said to provide a full-duplex capacity of 250 Mbps @ 12.5 
miles(http://www.ubnt.com/airlink/), but that gives very little room for fade 
margin, if any. If you can't wait for AF5, you could buy AF24 now, and then 
replace those with AF5s later in the year.


Rubens


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Axxcelera passwd / factory reset?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Thanks Tom,
I appreciate a good feedback



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: tfad...@coastinet.com [mailto:tfad...@coastinet.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 7:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Axxcelera passwd / factory reset?

 Wow, brings back memories. 11 years ago I deployed 3 test networks: Canopy, 
Axxcelera, and Trango. I chose Trango for ease of deployment, price(Fox) and 
throughput. I took down the Canopy and sold it but I left the Axxcelera up and 
running a small business park of 6 businesses. 6 years later I they added on to 
the business park and I still had some Axxcelera units but I could not remember 
how to program them, very cryptic interface but great throughput. I took them 
down and put up Trango, but I never had one problem with Axxcelera, they just 
ran!

Tom Fadgen
coastinet.com

I

On Monday 02/09/2013 at 12:48 pm, 
mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have any idea how to do a passwd or factory reset on axxcelera radios?

Thanks,
Mike
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Axxcelera passwd / factory reset?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Mike
Please send me note off list. I'll have our support contact you

Thanks
Alex




Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:


Anyone have any idea how to do a passwd or factory reset on axxcelera radios?

Thanks,
Mike
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] New hybrid fiber replaces Cat5

[alex phillips]

http://bit.ly/18DjZYS

-- 
*Alex Phillips*
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
WISPA.org Board of Directors/Secretary (2011-2014)
*540-908-3993*
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] OEM UBNT WSM5s for sale

[alex phillips]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=190862319789

-- 
*Alex Phillips*
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
WISPA.org Board of Directors/Secretary (2011-2014)
*540-908-3993*
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 quiet zone letter and contact points

[Freylekhman, Alex]

David
Check with this girl, she may be able to help you with that.

Alex


Cory Crenshaw
President, FCC-FAA Licensing Specialist
Crenshaw Communications Consulting, LLC
ph: 832-617-0217
em: c...@c3fcc.com<mailto:c...@c3fcc.com><mailto:c...@c3fcc.com>
wb: http://www.C3FCC.com<http://www.c3fcc.com/>



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: David Williamson 
mailto:dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:28:06 -0400
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 quiet zone letter and contact points

I need to see if anyone out there has a 3.65 quiet zone template letter to send 
to the grandfathered FSS earth stations.  Also, I need contact information for 
the following earth stations so I know where to send the letters to…

MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc.
New Skies Networks, Inc.
SES Americom, Inc.
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Intelsat LLC
AT&T Corp.

Any help or guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks,

David Williamson
Owner
Winchester Wireless
Winchester, VA
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Alternatives to Ubiquiti hardware after death of the SDK program?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Tom,
To support our customers large and small we provisioned APIs into management 
system. With that you get really nice management by itself which automates 
equipment provisioning and management, as well as interfaces to connect with 
3rd part software packages such as billing, CRM etc...

However, AB-MAX/ExcelMAX is not WiFi gear which puts you in a slightly 
different price bracket
Alex



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>

From: Tom Sharples [mailto:tsharp...@qorvus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Alternatives to Ubiquiti hardware after death of the SDK 
program?

Hello all,

We're being forced to look at alternatives to UBNT now that they've killed off 
the SDK program, and I imagine some of the larger WISPs that rely on the 
ability to heavily customize feature-sets feel the same way. Any suggestions as 
to where we should be looking?

Thanks,

Tom S.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Leasing Customer Premise Equipment

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Adam
Talk to Bill, his info is attached

Alex

--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Adam Vocks [mailto:adam.vo...@cticomputers.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:42 AM
To: us...@wug.cc ; WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Leasing Customer Premise Equipment

Does anyone have a contact for a company who lets you lease customer premise 
equipment?

Thanks,

Adam Vocks
CTI
<>___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Are Ubiquiti cables failing???

[Freylekhman, Alex]

+1

--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Patrick Leary [mailto:patrick.le...@alvarion.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 07:51 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org 
Cc: memb...@wispa.org ; WISPA General List 

Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Are Ubiquiti cables failing???

Considering Ben is working hard all Saturday wading into the dialogue deeply 
implies UBNT takes this seriously and cares. That alone says much. Props to Ben 
from a fellow vendor.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, "Rick Harnish" 
mailto:rharn...@wispa.org>> wrote:

I have been in contact with Ben through several emails.  I am confident that 
they are doing their best to address these issues.  This is not the type of 
thing WISPA should be focusing on anyways.

Where there is a Wisp, there is a 
way!

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 Option 2 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org
adm...@wispa.org (Trina and Rick)




From: members-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 12:59 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] Are Ubiquiti cables failing???

A good example of a good company trying to do a good thing and failing at it. 
Maybe because it is outside of their core competence. No good deed goes 
unpunished.
Ben could answer but my bet is that they wanted to come out with the cable to 
help their customers with a perceived issue. That issue being quality cable at 
a reasonable price. I doubt Ubiquity thought they were going to make a mint off 
of cable margins.

I would rather see a company like ubiquity focus on their main business and 
churn out great products on a reliable ship schedule than get distracted by 
fringe lines. Of course all of this is easy to say in the middle of a storm. I 
would likely be praising them and their cable if there weren't so many issues. 
I am just glad I didn't buy much of it.


Lewis Bergman

Texas Communications

4309 Maple St.

Abilene, TX 79602-8099

325-695-6962 x 1601

325-439-0533 cell
On 11/3/2012 11:47 AM, Ben Moore wrote:
Hi Rick,

I will add a little more to this...The cable itself was tested thoroughly prior 
to release (UV, outdoor rating, etc...).  The cable passed all testing.  
Unfortunately, some of the cable did not have the same quality as the cable 
that was tested/passed testing.  We have corrected this and moved away from the 
vendor that caused these issues.  The new cable has not had any issues.

As stated, we will work any customer that has experienced problems with the 
cable.  Please contact us directly.

Thanks,
Ben

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Rick Harnish 
mailto:rharn...@wispa.org>> wrote:

I just heard about these problems last week at WISPAPALOOZA from Matt 
Villarreal.  It sounds like a serious issue and one that should be addressed by 
the manufacturer.  While Ubiquiti is a great partner for WISPA and the 
industry, they do need to take responsibility for products developed and pushed 
to market without proper testing.  I am BCC copying Ben Moore to see what they 
intend to do about this problem.  It will be interesting to know how many reels 
of this defective cable were sold, whether the defective coating has been 
corrected and whether replacement cable will be shipped.



It would be the best interest of everyone if class action can be avoided.  
Let’s come to the table and come to a satisfactory conclusion for all.  I will 
await Ben and Ubiquiti’s response before taking any further steps.

Where there is a Wisp, there is a 
way!

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 Option 2 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org
adm...@wispa.org (Trina and Rick)







> -Original Message-

> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On

> Behalf Of Paolo Di Francesco

> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 8:03 AM

> To: WISPA General List

> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Are Ubiquiti cables failing???

>

> Hi all

>

> any feedback (positive or negative) regarding the new "TOUGHCable CARRIER"

> ?

>

> Just for curiosity: Anybody thinking of a class action ?

>

> It's not only the value of the cable or smoked devices itself, it's also the 
> service

> interruption

>

> Thank you

>

> > I just saw our first failure a couple weeks ago, it was consistent

> > with photos I've seen of ot

Re: [WISPA] Challenge to PMP manufacturers!

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Mike,
Respectfully disagree with you. We've just made announcements on tuesday at 4G 
world. This is some pretty cool stuff with really interesting features already 
available as well as planned

1. http://axxcelera.com/news.php?id=97

2. http://axxcelera.com/news.php?id=95

3. http://axxcelera.com/news.php?id=96

Gino, per earlier exchange links to press releases above. 

Thanks
Alex


--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [mailto:wispawirel...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:16 PM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Challenge to PMP manufacturers!

There hasn't been much innovation in the marketplace, just going faster.

I'm not sure if I'd want to see your idea first or multi-radio beamforming. I 
think it'd be nice to have multiple streams coming out of a given antenna being 
directed towards different clients.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -
From: "Gino Villarini" 
To: a...@afmug.com, "WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)" 

Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 1:14:39 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Challenge to PMP manufacturers!







I would like to see a Multiband Mimo PMP System similar to what is being 
developed in the LTE-Advanced RF protocol, where a BaseStation can use various 
spectrum bands to talk to CPEs… 



Imaging having an AP with multiple RF Sections using 2.4,3.x,5.x and aggregate 
all bands in a single Layer 1 medium to the CPE…also could split the 
downlink/uplink in various bands…youll need sync, plus some special sauce to 
organize Spectrum availability and Identify external interference.. but all 
that could be achieve out of the AP in a Cloud controller… 



So whos the taker? 



Gino A. Villarini 

g...@aeronetpr.com 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 

787.273.4143 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Elections in 70 days


--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Cameron Crum [mailto:cc...@wispmon.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 05:15 PM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

Funny, I don't recall rove or cheney heading the fcc. How about we dump all the 
taxes or "fees" or whatever they want to call it and really label the playing 
field?

On Tuesday, August 28, 2012, Fred Goldstein 
mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com>> wrote:
> At 8/28/2012 04:20 PM, Jim Patient wrote:
>
> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";
>  boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01CD855A.858D9814"
>
> http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/
>
>
> It's jut an idiotic screed from an idiotic extreme right-wing website that 
> looks at everything through red-colored conspiracy glasses.  USF was created 
> by Congress in TA96 as a way to pay for telephone service in rural areas, 
> mostly in fact red states, by taxing everyone, but mostly from blue states.  
> At the time, all that officially mattered was POTS.  (However, any facilities 
> that could carry POTS could be subsidized, including Fiber to the Ranch.  
> Only the actual ISP content was not subsidized.)  Now POTS is declining so 
> the FCC has decided that something called "broadband" should be subsidized 
> instead.
>
> Now the right thing would have been to subsidize the telecommunications part 
> of the service (basic service, "el broadband") and allow open access 
> competition to use it by ISPs and other content providers ("la broadband").  
> But the Bells wanted vertical integration to keep off those pesky ISPs.  So 
> the Cheney-Rove FCC revoked Computer II/III and took away the right of ISPs 
> to use common carrier telco facilities, except dial-up.  The Genechowski FCC 
> then decided that this vertically-integrated "broadband" was more important 
> than dial tone and so it will get the subsidies.  The actual subsidy flow was 
> capped so it, and the tax rate, will be lower than it would have been 
> otherwise under the pre-2011 blank check USF.
>
> So money will flow from New York, Massachusetts, California, New Jersey, 
> Rhode Island, and other states that are either a) almost all Bell or b) low 
> cost, and go to Mississippi, Wyoming, Alaska, Iowa, the Dakotas, Idaho, 
> Puerto Rico, and Utah, to name some big per-capita recipient states.  This is 
> hardly robbing the poor to give to the rich.  It's a direct result of the 
> "two senators per state" rule and the negotiations that led to the Telecom 
> Act, a subsidy to rural states.
>
> WISPs are caught in the middle since they're the unsubsidized companies 
> proving that in many places it is possible to do the job far more cheaply 
> than the subsidy whores can do it.  The FCC recognized that with the 
> unsubsidized competitor rule that CenturyLink is trying to overturn.  It's 
> not perfect but WISPA did an excellent job of lobbying, certainly by the 
> standards of the otherwise-does-a-great-possum-imitation ISP industry.  So it 
> could have been a lot worse -- the old USF would have funded ILECs to compete 
> with WISPs anyway, and did so in some locations.
>
>  --
>  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
>  ionary Consultinghttp://www.ionary.com/
>  +1 617 795 2701
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 2.5 Ghz Equipment Experiences

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Gino,
There were series of delays from our technology partners that pushed the 
equipment release back. We are planing to make some major LTE announcement 
towards the 4G world.

Just in case if you need 2.5GHz wimax solution today please contact a good 
friend of mine Les Sparrey (925) 759-0707 lspar...@pwnets.com

Alex


--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 11:39 AM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.5 Ghz Equipment Experiences

Yes, but its getting a big push on 2.5 form China and Clearwire

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 11:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.5 Ghz Equipment Experiences

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Gino Villarini  wrote:
> We looked at PW, requested some info via their webpage... no response...
>
> We are inclined to to TD-LTE...  but apparently all td-lte products is 
> vaporware still. Only a small group producing gear, usually the big guys like 
> Samsung, Ericsson,NSN ect...

In Asia people are actually using TD-LTE, but 2.3 is more usual than
2.5 GHz. A deployment I know of is using NSN @ 2.5 GHz.


Rubens
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] [OFFTOPIC?] ASI (video) to IP and vice versa

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Paolo
We do have equipment that offers ASI interfaces for STL/TSL. Let's take this 
offlist to discuss

Thanks
Alex


--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

- Original Message -
From: Paolo Di Francesco [mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:02 AM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] [OFFTOPIC?] ASI (video) to IP and vice versa

Hi All,

I know it could be off topic, but I was wondering if you are using ASI 
over IP (for the broadcasters) and what you are using

Thank you

-- 


Ing. Paolo Di Francesco

Level7 s.r.l. unipersonale

Sede operativa: Largo Montalto, 5 - 90144 Palermo

C.F. e P.IVA  05940050825
Fax : +39-091-8772072
assistenza: (+39) 091-8776432
web: http://www.level7.it




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA 2012 Next Week - ANyone going?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

I'll be there, flying in Monday
Let's meet somewhere at the show



--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 08:06 AM
To: a...@afmug.com ; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org) 

Subject: [WISPA] CTIA 2012 Next Week - ANyone going?

New Orleans, anyone going?

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Who has service in Orange Co CA?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Double check with Telepacific (former Covad wireless) these guys have a large 
deployments in San Jose and LA areas with our gear

Alex

--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Doug Clark [mailto:d...@txox.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 02:57 PM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Who has service in Orange Co CA?

I am very familiar with most of the Orange County area and I am not sure that 
there is ANY fixed wireless companies there.
The challenge would be overwhelming IMO.  If there are fixed wireless I would 
bet money that they are servicing businesses only.




~Doug
---Original Message---

From: Rick Kunze<mailto:rku...@colusanet.com>
Date: 4/22/2012 11:42:08 AM
To: WISPA General List<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: [WISPA] Who has service in Orange Co CA?

My brother is looking for some better service than Dish.  He's in the
subdivision near Kraemer and Imperial Hwy.  Anyone got an
infrastructure in that area?  Seems like it should have several
players.  He's looking for some Ethernet.

He's looking for "good", not "cheap", and he's not the whining
type.  Important distinction there!

Rk
K6ISP


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 1ft dish?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Tom
Why can't you use 24GHz unlicensed for that path?

Alex


--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 03:56 PM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] Licensed 1ft dish?

Are both 18Ghz and 11Ghz  limited to minimum 2ft dish size?

Just wondering if 1ft was allowed?


I know, some might ask "why"? Because its for a really short link (200 ft) that 
has to be 350mb+ FDX, but dont want to use 60G millimeterwave, because the 
viable mounting options are not stable enough to prevent sway and safely 
reliably support that tight of a narrow beamwidth.
I'm pretty sure, I'll end up doing this in 23G, which allows 1ft dish, (similar 
beamwidth to 11G with 2ft).  But just wanted to double check rules for 18 and 
11.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -
From: Chuck Hogg<mailto:ch...@shelbybb.com>
To: victo...@stlbroadband.com<mailto:victo...@stlbroadband.com> ; WISPA General 
List<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Preventing stupid outages

I don't think you understand.  A GFCI outlet is a "mechanical" device.  You 
can't reboot it.

Regards,
Chuck


On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Victoria Proffer 
mailto:victo...@stlbroadband.com>> wrote:
Can you set it on an auto-ping?

Victoria Proffer
STLWiMAX, LLC<http://www.stlwimax.com/>
314-974-5600

From: Brian Webster 
[mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com<mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:02 AM
To: victo...@stlbroadband.com<mailto:victo...@stlbroadband.com>; 'WISPA General 
List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Preventing stupid outages

The remote reboot power strip does nothing for you if the GFCI outlet or 
breaker has tripped, that needs to be reset unless it’s an auto reset device.

Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com<http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
www.Broadband-Mapping.com<http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Victoria Proffer
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:40 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Preventing stupid outages

Is there a remote power strip that can be activated by a cell phone?

i.e.
strip   pstn > my computer

Victoria Proffer
STLWiMAX, LLC<http://www.stlwimax.com/>
314-974-5600

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]<mailto:[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]> 
On Behalf Of Ryan Ghering
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:20 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Preventing stupid outages

We don't use them at towers, but I have here at home auto resetting GFCI 
outlets for my
Saltwater reef tank. Got them from Home Depot.. They reset automatically after 
a few mins..

Ryan
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Matt Hoppes 
mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>> wrote:
You have to have GFCI outlets indoors?  I've never heard of that
regulation before.

A few thoughts come to mind:

* Battery backup with 2 or so hours of run time along with a remote page
for a power outage.  Doesn't prevent you from having to dispatch but it
keeps you from having an outage.

* Re-check code?  I don't understand why you need a GFCI outlet inside
your shack.You don't have a sink or other water nearby.  I don't
have GFCI outlets in my office.  Maybe I'm missing something here.

If you are mounting an outdoor NEMA box with your equipment and just
plugging into a GFCI then maybe you can figure out some way to get a
hardwire into the box rather than plugging into an outside GFCI?

On 3/16/12 9:04 AM, Troy Settle wrote:
> Ok, so to keep to code, we have a GFCI outlet for most of our towers.
> One of them tripped last night, causing me to have to put on some 80
> miles just to push a button (yes, it could have been much worse).
>
> Is there anything to prevent stupid outages like this from happening
> without violating code?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> Troy Settle, Network Administrator
>
> The Wired Road Authority
>
> 1117 E. Stuart Dr.
>
> Galax, VA 24333
>
> (276) 238-0049 (office)
>
> (276) 237-3890 (cell)
>
> tset...@thewiredroad.net<mailto:tset...@thewiredroad.net>
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Usually, over the air includes overhead, as example gross 54mbps would look 
like net 36mbps


Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:03:41 -0500
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear


I think you mean lower?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Feb 28, 2012 4:59 PM, "Freylekhman, Alex" 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>> wrote:
These are real aggregate throughput numbers based on UDP packets. Since 
equipment is a layer 2 bridge, TCP numbers will be less and will vary as a 
result of framesize and latency. In regards to the over the air rates, to be 
completely honest, I'm not sure what they are since we never talk about them 
nor publish, guess would be ~20% higher



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>

From: Gino Villarini mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:43:11 -0500
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Cc: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

This are air rates our real troughput?

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:19 PM, "Freylekhman, Alex" 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>> wrote:

Tom,
The MIMO comment made earlier was in reference to the 90mbps as a roadmap 
feature for Canopy. As far as AXX, both of the WiMAX lines are not MIMO. The 
system is built based on the SEQUANS 802.16d chipset so customers get all of 
the bells and whistles as well as powerful dual-core processed as a part of the 
package. Supported channels of operation are 5/10/15MHz, where 15MHz yields 
47mbps. Please keep in mind that once you enable DFS we do take a slight hit on 
the throughput from 47 to 43mbps.



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>

From: Tom DeReggi mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:46:47 -0500
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

We did an evaluation of Axxelera a number of years back, and we felt it was
a pretty hot product, and more affordable than some of the alternatives..
(But then Ubiquiti came out with Dirt cheap MIMO)

Axxelera Rep,

Are you saying Axxelera now has a MIMO prioduct, that supports either MAtric
A and B?

When looking at Axxelera previously (prior to mimo), I noticed the 15Mhz
channel size (Not quite the 20Mhz we desired most, but better than 10Mhz
trends of Wimax or First generation OFDM Canopy)

What channel size/width is Axxelera's MIMO products?

Is the MIMO line still using true TDD constant carrier APs, or instead like
the many other just using wifi chipsets that dont constantly transmit?

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -
From: "Freylekhman, Alex" 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear


Gino,
In regards to the 90mbps -  2x2  mimo can either be set as matrix A or B,
there is a  decision to be made if you go after distance or capacity.



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Yikes, seem ages you haven't looked at Canopy, Classic Aps do 14 Mbps, new
ones 45 Mbps, next one (Q2 2012) 90 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] D

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

These are real aggregate throughput numbers based on UDP packets. Since 
equipment is a layer 2 bridge, TCP numbers will be less and will vary as a 
result of framesize and latency. In regards to the over the air rates, to be 
completely honest, I'm not sure what they are since we never talk about them 
nor publish, guess would be ~20% higher



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Gino Villarini mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:43:11 -0500
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Cc: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

This are air rates our real troughput?

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:19 PM, "Freylekhman, Alex" 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>> wrote:

Tom,
The MIMO comment made earlier was in reference to the 90mbps as a roadmap 
feature for Canopy. As far as AXX, both of the WiMAX lines are not MIMO. The 
system is built based on the SEQUANS 802.16d chipset so customers get all of 
the bells and whistles as well as powerful dual-core processed as a part of the 
package. Supported channels of operation are 5/10/15MHz, where 15MHz yields 
47mbps. Please keep in mind that once you enable DFS we do take a slight hit on 
the throughput from 47 to 43mbps.



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>

From: Tom DeReggi mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:46:47 -0500
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

We did an evaluation of Axxelera a number of years back, and we felt it was
a pretty hot product, and more affordable than some of the alternatives..
(But then Ubiquiti came out with Dirt cheap MIMO)

Axxelera Rep,

Are you saying Axxelera now has a MIMO prioduct, that supports either MAtric
A and B?

When looking at Axxelera previously (prior to mimo), I noticed the 15Mhz
channel size (Not quite the 20Mhz we desired most, but better than 10Mhz
trends of Wimax or First generation OFDM Canopy)

What channel size/width is Axxelera's MIMO products?

Is the MIMO line still using true TDD constant carrier APs, or instead like
the many other just using wifi chipsets that dont constantly transmit?

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -
From: "Freylekhman, Alex" 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear


Gino,
In regards to the 90mbps -  2x2  mimo can either be set as matrix A or B,
there is a  decision to be made if you go after distance or capacity.



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com<http://www.axxcelera.com>



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Yikes, seem ages you haven't looked at Canopy, Classic Aps do 14 Mbps, new
ones 45 Mbps, next one (Q2 2012) 90 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

A contact at the FCC told me years ago that it meant you can not do /new/
installs of the old DFS gear. Anyone have a FCC rep saying something
different?

Why not Canopy? $2000 AP's, $400 CPE and 3~4mbit. I am sure that has came
down since my first Canopy pack back in the pre-nehalm(sp) days.

Looking at Axxcelera. Might be in the same vein and Canopy. Anyone with
experience that wants to share? I do not want to just buy a stop gap
product that will work till Ubnt get their stuff ready.
This is going to be direction we head in once we find gear.

Jeromie
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.or

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Tom,
The MIMO comment made earlier was in reference to the 90mbps as a roadmap 
feature for Canopy. As far as AXX, both of the WiMAX lines are not MIMO. The 
system is built based on the SEQUANS 802.16d chipset so customers get all of 
the bells and whistles as well as powerful dual-core processed as a part of the 
package. Supported channels of operation are 5/10/15MHz, where 15MHz yields 
47mbps. Please keep in mind that once you enable DFS we do take a slight hit on 
the throughput from 47 to 43mbps.



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

From: Tom DeReggi mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:46:47 -0500
To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

We did an evaluation of Axxelera a number of years back, and we felt it was
a pretty hot product, and more affordable than some of the alternatives..
(But then Ubiquiti came out with Dirt cheap MIMO)

Axxelera Rep,

Are you saying Axxelera now has a MIMO prioduct, that supports either MAtric
A and B?

When looking at Axxelera previously (prior to mimo), I noticed the 15Mhz
channel size (Not quite the 20Mhz we desired most, but better than 10Mhz
trends of Wimax or First generation OFDM Canopy)

What channel size/width is Axxelera's MIMO products?

Is the MIMO line still using true TDD constant carrier APs, or instead like
the many other just using wifi chipsets that dont constantly transmit?

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -----
From: "Freylekhman, Alex" 
mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>>
To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear


Gino,
In regards to the 90mbps -  2x2  mimo can either be set as matrix A or B,
there is a  decision to be made if you go after distance or capacity.



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com<mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com>
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Yikes, seem ages you haven't looked at Canopy, Classic Aps do 14 Mbps, new
ones 45 Mbps, next one (Q2 2012) 90 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

A contact at the FCC told me years ago that it meant you can not do /new/
installs of the old DFS gear. Anyone have a FCC rep saying something
different?

Why not Canopy? $2000 AP's, $400 CPE and 3~4mbit. I am sure that has came
down since my first Canopy pack back in the pre-nehalm(sp) days.

Looking at Axxcelera. Might be in the same vein and Canopy. Anyone with
experience that wants to share? I do not want to just buy a stop gap
product that will work till Ubnt get their stuff ready.
This is going to be direction we head in once we find gear.

Jeromie
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Story of my life .. haha




Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Well, they have the Secret Sauce... but I cant tell you! You're from the Dark 
Side! Lol!

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Freylekhman, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

LOL .. the low latency is true, can't argue here. WiMAX does carry a latency of 
~3-4 times the frame duration. However, MIMO is not WiMAX specific.  It's about 
spatial multiplexing and diversity coding, the concept is pretty much the same 
between WiFi, WiMAX, LTE or proprietary 



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

And low latency to boot!!!

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Aleksander, the Cambium networks System its not Wimax based, its proprietary RF 
on FPGA so no contains or Wimax protocol compromises... 90 Mbps will be 
available at the AP...

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Freylekhman, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Gino,
In regards to the 90mbps -  2x2  mimo can either be set as matrix A or B, there 
is a  decision to be made if you go after distance or capacity. 



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Yikes, seem ages you haven't looked at Canopy, Classic Aps do 14 Mbps, new ones 
45 Mbps, next one (Q2 2012) 90 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

A contact at the FCC told me years ago that it meant you can not do /new/ 
installs of the old DFS gear. Anyone have a FCC rep saying something different?

Why not Canopy? $2000 AP's, $400 CPE and 3~4mbit. I am sure that has came down 
since my first Canopy pack back in the pre-nehalm(sp) days.

Looking at Axxcelera. Might be in the same vein and Canopy. Anyone with 
experience that wants to share? I do not want to just buy a stop gap product 
that will work till Ubnt get their stuff ready.
This is going to be direction we head in once we find gear.

Jeromie
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

LOL .. the low latency is true, can't argue here. WiMAX does carry a latency of 
~3-4 times the frame duration. However, MIMO is not WiMAX specific.  It's about 
spatial multiplexing and diversity coding, the concept is pretty much the same 
between WiFi, WiMAX, LTE or proprietary 



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

And low latency to boot!!!

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Aleksander, the Cambium networks System its not Wimax based, its proprietary RF 
on FPGA so no contains or Wimax protocol compromises... 90 Mbps will be 
available at the AP...

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Freylekhman, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Gino,
In regards to the 90mbps -  2x2  mimo can either be set as matrix A or B, there 
is a  decision to be made if you go after distance or capacity. 



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Yikes, seem ages you haven't looked at Canopy, Classic Aps do 14 Mbps, new ones 
45 Mbps, next one (Q2 2012) 90 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

A contact at the FCC told me years ago that it meant you can not do /new/ 
installs of the old DFS gear. Anyone have a FCC rep saying something different?

Why not Canopy? $2000 AP's, $400 CPE and 3~4mbit. I am sure that has came down 
since my first Canopy pack back in the pre-nehalm(sp) days.

Looking at Axxcelera. Might be in the same vein and Canopy. Anyone with 
experience that wants to share? I do not want to just buy a stop gap product 
that will work till Ubnt get their stuff ready.
This is going to be direction we head in once we find gear.

Jeromie
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Gino,
In regards to the 90mbps -  2x2  mimo can either be set as matrix A or B, there 
is a  decision to be made if you go after distance or capacity. 



Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Yikes, seem ages you haven't looked at Canopy, Classic Aps do 14 Mbps, new ones 
45 Mbps, next one (Q2 2012) 90 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

A contact at the FCC told me years ago that it meant you can not do /new/ 
installs of the old DFS gear. Anyone have a FCC rep saying something different?

Why not Canopy? $2000 AP's, $400 CPE and 3~4mbit. I am sure that has came down 
since my first Canopy pack back in the pre-nehalm(sp) days.

Looking at Axxcelera. Might be in the same vein and Canopy. Anyone with 
experience that wants to share? I do not want to just buy a stop gap product 
that will work till Ubnt get their stuff ready.
This is going to be direction we head in once we find gear.

Jeromie
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Jeromie,
The new test requirements did not affect already certified equipment. They only 
affected new requests for certification. Please take a look at Axxcelera 
AB-MAX, you will like what we do with DFS, even though equipment was certified 
under old guidelines


Thanks
Alex

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director, North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  p: (804) 864-4125
  m: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com



-Original Message-
From: Jeromie Reeves [mailto:jree...@18-30chat.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] DFS2 gear

Is there anything out there that is DFS2 certified for PtMP ? I know of Canopy 
and (someday) Ubnt. Everything else I know if is hi-cap PtP but all my links 
are to long for those.

Jeromie Reeves
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] small project in Aspen CO

[Freylekhman, Alex]

I'm looking for a VAR in Aspen CO area for a small but challenging wireless 
project that I could point an enduser to. Can you please ping me if interested 

thanks
Alex




Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
  P: (804) 864-4125
  M: (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Cabling vendors in NYC

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Isaac
Check with Talley, they have a warehouse not too far in NJ

Eric Shiebler 201-715-9086 mobile

Good luck
Alex


--
Sent from BlackBerry device

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com

- Original Message -
From: Isaac Wilder [mailto:isaac_li...@freenetworkmovement.org]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 06:07 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Subject: [WISPA] Cabling vendors in NYC

Does anybody know a vendor in the new york area where I can buy spools
of weatherized, EMF shielded cat5e? I'm looking for something akin to
Level 2 toughcable. I would normally order from lcom or pasadena
networks, but time is of the essence, and I didn't think ahead.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.




thanks,
Isaac Wilder
The Free Network Foundation
www.thefnf.org
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Internet Services in rural VA

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Can anyone recommend a WISP in Ararat VA (Zip 24053) ?

 

Thanks

 

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless 
a Moseley Company

   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192

afreylekh...@axxcelera.com  
www.axxcelera.com  

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Is this a record of some kind?

[Freylekhman, Alex]

For 5GHz the only integrated option is dual polarity 60°-Az x 7°-El pattern. 
For 3GHz we use high performance SectorShape(tm) antennas. we designed them and 
own IP. These units come in 60 and 90 degrees with 6°-El. These units more 
expensive but allow our 3.65GHz system to implement adjacent sector adjacent 
channel planning (even though it's not recommended)

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless 
a Moseley Company
   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192
afreylekh...@axxcelera.com
www.axxcelera.com


-Original Message-
From: Greg Ihnen [mailto:os10ru...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 1:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Is this a record of some kind?

What's the vertical beam width? Any idea?

Greg

On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:

> Here is one that we made for 2.4not MDK's but we used ours for 7years.
> Ours is 18.5 dBi (range tested by the way) about 105 degree beamwidth. This
> one is V pol. We did a design for H pol, but the specs were very similar to
> those old Hpol guides from PAC so we just ened up using those where we neede
> H-pol. I do however have Hpol 5 GHz (about 17 dBi, 95 degree BW) and Hpol 5
> GHz Omni's (about 10 dBi) as well. We don't really sell them, but I have a
> couple laying around that I could part with if someone really wanted some. I
> don't have any of the omni's as those we're a one time build and we didn't
> do many, but could get some cut if someone REALLY wanted some. I've attached
> the PDF and some pics from on top of a tower since the images in the PDF
> aren't great. On the tower pic, the 2.4 is on the left and the 5 gig is on
> the right. Pic is from behind so it's hard to see much, but these both have
> the protective covers on them anyway, so not a whole lot to see on the
> fronts.
> 
> Cameron
> 
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
> 
>> I stand corrected, dumbfounded and humbled.
>> 
>> BTW  how about a photo and spec on that " our own design and manufacture
>> slotted waveguide sector"
>> 
>> 
>> Chuck Profito
>> 209-988-7388
>> CV-Access, Inc.
>> www.cv-access.com / cprofito'at'cv-access.com
>> Providing Broadband Internet Access to
>> California's Rural Central Valley
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of MDK
>> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 10:51 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Is this a record of some kind?
>> 
>> NOT.All my access points are star-os based, and I use NO amps anywhere,
>> and with the exception of one long point to point link, no high power
>> cards,
>> 
>> either.   ( that link is now out of production, replaced by ubnt rocketm5
>> and solid dishes.  )
>> 
>> netbook end, is whatever atheros based card it comes with, the access point
>> is a WLM54SAG, not the high power version, and set at default output,
>> connected to our own design and manufacture slotted waveguide sector.
>> 
>> For many years, it was a CM9 at the AP, but last year it started behaving
>> strange,  and it got replaced.
>> 
>> 
>> ++
>> Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
>> 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
>> ++
>> 
>> --
>> From: "Chuck Profito" 
>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:03 PM
>> To: "'WISPA General List'" 
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Is this a record of some kind?
>> 
>>> probably a ruckus on the other end
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of MDK
>>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 10:16 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: [WISPA] Is this a record of some kind?
>>> 
>>> This evening I was at one of my access points... one that has several
>>> backhauls and various 2.4 and 5 ghz ap's at it.
>>> 
>>> After I was done with my few minutes of doing things, I wanted to make
>>> sure
>>> I had not physically disconnected or accidentally unhooked anything
>>> (messing
>>> 
>>> with the batteries, checking water levels, etc).I pulled out a
>>> netbook.
>>> Acer Aspire One to be precise, running windows xp, using the normal wifi
>>> card it came with.   I fired it up (it is set to "any" so it simply
>>> associates to the access points that are open at home, work, etc), and
>>> after
>>> 
>>> I was done, noted it said it was connected, at which point I opened
>> google
>>> on the browser to confirm connectivity.   Google popped up, meaning
>> things
>>> were connected, and then I decided to run a speed test.   I got about
>>> 30KB/s
>>> 
>>> speed, which is like painfully slow.   I was standing outside, with the
>>> netbook sitting on the hood of my truck.
>>> 
>>> So, I decided to see what it was associated to, and it was another access
>>> point ...  11 MILES AWAY!   I confirmed it by the SSID and by the ip dhcp
>>> had assigned, as belonging

Re: [WISPA] GPS synced systems

[Freylekhman, Alex]

Gentlemen,

All of our WiMAX TDD equipment comes with standard GPS synchronization. US 
options are 3.65 and 5GHz. It helps us to mitigate far and near co-channel 
interference

 

Best regards

Alex

 

 

 

Aleksander Freylekhman
Sales Director North America
Axxcelera Broadband Wireless 
a Moseley Company

   T: +1 (804) 864-4125
   M: +1 (440) 220-2192

afreylekh...@axxcelera.com <mailto:afreylekh...@axxcelera.com> 
www.axxcelera.com <http://www.axxcelera.com> 

 

From: Mike Hammett 
Date: June 14, 2010 11:19:42 AM CDT
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] GPS synced systems
Reply-To: WISPA General List 

Other than Canopy, what systems also use GPS sync?

-- 


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] West Coast WISPA activities?

[Alex Perez]

On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:

> WISPA has a California mailing list (probably califor...@wispa.org or
> c...@wispa.org) - check that yet?

Thanks Josh, I had no idea. I'm subscribed now!
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
> continue that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Alex Perez  wrote:
>> Thanks Josh,
>> 
>> I'm familiar with Bill; He and I live just a few miles from each other. 
>> Anybody else out here in the west?
>> 
>> On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> 
>>> Bill Prince is out that way.
>>> 
>>> http://skylinebroadbandservice.com/
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
>>> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
>>> continue that counts.”
>>> --- Winston Churchill
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Alex Perez  wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> 
>>>> I've been lurking on the lists for a few weeks now, and don't really see 
>>>> any activity by ISPs in the western united states (PST/PDT). Is anybody 
>>>> out there? I'm in Silicon Valley, and believe it or not, there are lots of 
>>>> folks with almost zero terrestrial wireless options at 3+ megabits on the 
>>>> periphery of Silicon Valley.  If you're out there, any chance we can talk 
>>>> off-list?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alex Perez
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>> 
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> 
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>> 
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> 
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>> 
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] West Coast WISPA activities?

[Alex Perez]

Thanks Josh,

I'm familiar with Bill; He and I live just a few miles from each other. Anybody 
else out here in the west?

On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:

> Bill Prince is out that way.
> 
> http://skylinebroadbandservice.com/
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
> continue that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Alex Perez  wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I've been lurking on the lists for a few weeks now, and don't really see any 
>> activity by ISPs in the western united states (PST/PDT). Is anybody out 
>> there? I'm in Silicon Valley, and believe it or not, there are lots of folks 
>> with almost zero terrestrial wireless options at 3+ megabits on the 
>> periphery of Silicon Valley.  If you're out there, any chance we can talk 
>> off-list?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Alex Perez
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>> 
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] West Coast WISPA activities?

[Alex Perez]

Hi folks,

I've been lurking on the lists for a few weeks now, and don't really see any 
activity by ISPs in the western united states (PST/PDT). Is anybody out there? 
I'm in Silicon Valley, and believe it or not, there are lots of folks with 
almost zero terrestrial wireless options at 3+ megabits on the periphery of 
Silicon Valley.  If you're out there, any chance we can talk off-list?

Regards,
Alex Perez



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Policy WRT Job Inquiries on WISPA mailing list?

[Alex Perez]

Hi there, 

I'm a new subscriber here, and am located in the San Francisco Bay Area. The 
start-up I was systems administrator for just closed up shop, and I'm wondering 
whether or not it's considered kosher here to ask if anyone might know of any 
WISP (or non-W) employment opportunities in the region. Please reply off-list.

Thanks,
Alex Perez



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Sorry

[Alex Kelly]

Obviously that reply was to the wrong message, and was not meant to for
the list.

Sorry, I was too quick on the keyboard. It's been a long day.

-Alex

--
Alex Kelly
ICON Technologies Inc.
"We take care of technology so you can take care of business".
570-876-6908
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Seaman
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 2:34 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 900 MHz Horizontal Omni Recommendation

Anyone here have specific recommendations for good 900 MHz Horizontal
Omni antennas?  
 
Thanks,
John




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] 900 MHz Horizontal Omni Recommendation

[Alex Kelly]

Our final cost was about $1150. I'm going to look at smtp-in in more
detail because I find this sudden swamping to be suspicious.

-Alex

--
Alex Kelly
ICON Technologies Inc.
"We take care of technology so you can take care of business".
570-876-6908
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Seaman
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 2:34 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 900 MHz Horizontal Omni Recommendation

Anyone here have specific recommendations for good 900 MHz Horizontal
Omni antennas?  
 
Thanks,
John




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

[Alex]

Finally!! Some closure. :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

Okay, here are the rules from the source:

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular
.nsf/0/b993dcdfc37fcdc486257251005c4e21/$FILE/AC70_7460_1K.pdf

Generally, towers over 200' or that rise above a projected plane of 
protection (no pun intended) around a public airport must be either 
painted and lit with red at night, or strobed (and optionally lit with 
red at night in lieu of the strobe).


Patrick Shoemaker
President, Vector Data Systems LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
mobile: (410) 991-5791
http://www.vectordatasystems.com


Bryan Scott wrote:
>> I'm no expert, but I have seen many towers with significant height that 
>> aren't painted.
>>
>> Heck, to that extent, buildings over 200' would need to be red\white,
then.
> 
> The best part about posting to large lists is how quickly third-party 
> information is either substantiated or shredded to millions of pieces. 
> Thank goodness I'm just a network nerd and not the tower expert.
> 
> We collocate some gear on a parasitic/backup AM tower that's around 250' 
> or so.  The active, main tower is 400' (it was supposed to be 800 but 
> they gave up for one reason or another).  He commented how everything of 
> ours would have to be painted except our white dish that is in a white 
> portion.  He may have been quoting us (and is living by) pre-strobe 
> rules.  Or maybe they do what they do because they're AM towers.. in the 
> proximity (~5 miles) of a large airport, etc. etc.
> 
> 
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>


>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

[Alex]

lol

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

I'm no expert, but I have seen many towers with significant height that 
aren't painted.

Heck, to that extent, buildings over 200' would need to be red\white, then.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: "Bryan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower lighting


> Rick Harnish wrote:
>> My understanding (no research done) is that if there are strobe lights
>> installed, the towers do not have to be painted red/white.  Therefore, 
>> many
>> tower companies are installing strobes to cut down on maintenance 
>> (painting)
>> of their towers.  A night/day system which incorporates strobes during 
>> the
>> day and red lights at night should be adequate since no one can see the
>> red/white paint at night anyways.
>
> Over a certain height they have to be painted, no matter what (according
> to our local AM tower tech).  I think it's around 200 feet.
>
> -- Bryan
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

[Alex]

I use to build communications towers for a living, and what you say about
the strobe is true.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bryan Scott
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

Rick Harnish wrote:
> My understanding (no research done) is that if there are strobe lights
> installed, the towers do not have to be painted red/white.  Therefore,
many
> tower companies are installing strobes to cut down on maintenance
(painting)
> of their towers.  A night/day system which incorporates strobes during the
> day and red lights at night should be adequate since no one can see the
> red/white paint at night anyways.

Over a certain height they have to be painted, no matter what (according 
to our local AM tower tech).  I think it's around 200 feet.

-- Bryan




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] tower lighting

[Alex]

Tower lighting is Regulated by the FCC, and I don't think they will change
the way they regulate towering lighting.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:53 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] tower lighting

Does anyone know if there is a process/procedure at the commission that
citizens can engage to get a tower owner to change their lighting?
There is a new cell tower in my area (rural) that has white strobes that
is impacting the viewshed in the area.  I know that the owner can amend
their EA, but that's about it.  The neighbors are asking me what can be
done and I honestly don't know. Any pointers much appreciated.

 

Thanks

Chris





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OT: Cheating spouse software

[Alex]

Go hire a gumshoe. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OT: Cheating spouse software

Mike Hammett wrote:

> I had a client ask me about this. Does anyone know of software that
> will analyze a computer to assist someone in determining if their spouse
> is cheating? I'm afraid of a Google search giving me something that's a
> scam.

A number of rootkits include keyloggers, and some of the more fancy ones 
reportedly have regular screenshot capability - they'll take screen 
shots once a minute, say, dump 'em in a folder, then when they phone 
home to Botnet Central they'll send the pictures over too, to help the 
attacker identify what Web site that password goes to. (If you 
bookmarked your bank's Web site, it won't show up in the keylogger.)

Of course, that sort of thing tends to set off the anti-virus software, 
and even if you had one that wasn't detected, the software still leaves 
traces. Registry entries so it'll run at startup, logs and maybe 
screenshots stored somewhere on the hard drive. Also, that assumes the 
target is running Windows, probably; a second disk partition or a 
Live-CD of your favorite Linux distribution and your fancy keylogger 
software is useless.

Assuming you can get physical access to the target system, a hardware 
keylogger is the way to go.

http://www.thinkgeek.com/brain/whereisit.cgi?t=keylogger&x=0&y=0
here's a couple of 'em

This does require a couple separate accesses to the target location - 
one to install the keylogger device, and a second one to retrieve it - 
and it's much harder to pass off as an accident if you're compromised. 
With software, you could reasonably pretend it's a virus and that you 
have no knowledge of it; the hardware device, even if you don't know 
what it is, obviously is there for some reason, and is automatically 
much more suspicious.

As with any scenario like this, the best way to proceed depends largely 
upon your target's level of paranoia and expertise. Good luck!

David Smith
MVN.net




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] STAR BUCKS DROPPING T-MOBIL FREE AT&T WI-FI

[Alex]

Looked pretty weird to me.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] STAR BUCKS DROPPING T-MOBIL FREE AT&T WI-FI

What the hell is this?  I got some kind of religious website...
Was this a joke, accident or mistake?

- Original Message - 
From: "CHUCK PROFITO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:33 PM
Subject: [WISPA] STAR BUCKS DROPPING T-MOBIL FREE AT&T WI-FI


> http://tinyurl.com/yr28
>
>
>
> Chuck Profito
> 209-988-7388
> CV-ACCESS, INC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Providing High Speed Broadband
> to Rural Central California
>
>
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] New revenue stream *THREAD CLOSED!*

[Alex Huppenthal]

my apologies to the members of the list if they found it offensive.  
Reality is we need to consider content rules as much as need to  
consider VoIP gateways.
since you've arbitrarily decided its not 'proper content' based on  
your view, I've decided to drop my involvement in WISPA.  bye




On Mar 7, 2006, at 9:35 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:


Alex,

Please take this offlist.  This is not proper content for  
discussion on the

Wispa list servs.

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish
President
Supernova Technologies, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founding Member of WISPA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Behalf Of A. Huppenthal
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 8:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] New revenue stream

I have client who asked me if a tasteful nude picture web server would
be okay to deploy on the network.

They are willing to pay 5 times the normal rate for co-location, plus
additional fees for high load times.

When I called Qwest to find out about their policy they said they  
aren't

in the business of clensing the net or otherwise filtering content.

Since this server is not one of the companies, I wonder what sort of
liability exists..

It appears this is a huge source of revenue. In fact the same crew  
says

they want to provide DRM downloadable movies of the adult nature.

Now I've watched with some interest, what the major hotel chains are
doing and how much pay per view adult movies add to their bottom  
line. I

don't think this is a simple - you know I don't like it myself  -
answer. Its policy, revenue and finding the proper ground.

Any experience with this?

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Canopy Site, off-power-grid

[Alex Huppenthal]

Plan for an amp hour / hour..  24 amp hours / day. if you buy a  
couple of 100 amp hour walmart marine batteries you'd have 200/24 or  
about 9 days of run time without solar. I don't know what solar  
planning you need in Jersey. DoE has some maps of the US for solar  
planning - if it works out you only have 4 8 hour days around dec  
21st to charge your batteries, you'd need to calculate feeding the  
load - 1 amp continuous for 24 hours - which means 24 / 8 solar hours  
= 3 amps during that 8 hours for the load, plus battery charge time  
input. So, if you plan to charge the batteries to peak from zero in 3  
days, you'd need 200 / (8 hours (charge day) * 3) or about 9 amps for  
that. So a solar array might be 9 + 3 or 12 amps output @ 12 volts.  
The Moto stuff will work fine @ 12 volts, even though they are spec'd  
for higher. Finding a good 12 volt switch or router that suits you  
and draws little current can be a struggle.


hope this helps. by the way, I'm in Califon for the next couple of days.

On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:01 AM, Rick Smith wrote:



Need to install a short tower as a relay on a mountaintop, no power  
within 3/4 mile.


Anyone done battery / generator sites with one Canopy AP, one  
Canopy SM and a router, like Mikrotik in between ?


This is in NJ, not too good an environment for solar I imagine,  
although we'll be on a real high hill top (1250' elev) for this  
area...


R

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] AT&T merging with BellSouth

[Alex Huppenthal]

Google's market cap is $126 billion.. Still smaller than this new  
company, but close. Start a company with google's vision but for  
telcom and get a $150 billion market cap.. :-)



On Mar 5, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Frank Muto wrote:


NYT/WSJ

AT&T Inc. is nearing the acquisition of BellSouth Corp. for roughly  
$65
billion, people familiar with the situation said Saturday evening.  
A deal

could be announced as early as Monday, these people said.

Final terms of the deal could not be learned Saturday evening, but  
these
people said AT&T Inc. would pay a premium for BellSouth shares of  
at least
15%, valuing the company at $36 per share at least, up from its  
trading
price Friday of $31.46. That would push the total equity value of  
the deal
to at least $65 billion, plus the assumption of an additional $17  
billion of

BellSouth debt.

Spokespeople for BellSouth and AT&T declined to comment.

An AT&T-BellSouth deal would effectively cleave the nation's telecom
services in two, each vertically integrated with a local phone  
operation,
business services, and wireless unit. And it would effectively  
validate the
vision of competition laid out by the government -- one in which  
traditional
telecom firms compete directly against cable operators rather than  
against
each other. The move would give AT&T Inc. sole control over  
Cingular, the

nation's largest wireless operator.

A combination between AT&T and BellSouth could have combined market
capitalization of nearly $160 billion, making AT&T far larger than  
rival
Verizon. The deal would nonetheless set a showdown between AT&T and  
Verizon,
as the two fight to control wireless, the growth portion of the  
telecom

business.

It was the steep growth of Cingular -- joint owned by BellSouth and  
the
former SBC -- that helped push the two firms together, say telecom  
bankers
familiar with the space. As the importance of the wireless business  
grew,
they say, it became inevitable that SBC (which adopted the AT&T  
name just

months ago) would consolidate its position in the South.

Put together, the SBC territory would extend from California to  
Florida,
north to Illinois and south to Texas. Combining the two companies'  
current
market capitalizations, AT&T would have a market value approaching  
$150

billion, over 50% greater than Verizon.

AT&T Chairman and Chief Executive Edward Whitacre has made a name for
himself in the telecommunications industry as a serial acquirer.
Mr. Whitacre is able to boast of a string of acquisitions including  
Pacific
Telesis Corp., Ameritech Corp. and Southern New England  
Telecommunications
Corp. But as he nears retirement the market had been anticipating  
one last
hurrah from him; a BellSouth acquisition by AT&T has long been the  
subject

of speculation from analysts, investors and the two companies' rivals.

Still the speedy move to acquire BellSouth came as a surprise so  
soon after

Mr. Whitacre's takeover of AT&T Corp. last fall. His company is just
starting to digest the $16 billion acquisition. The former SBC
Communications Inc. took over AT&T Corp. and adopted the AT&T  
moniker. The
new company dominates nearly every aspect of the industry, from  
high-speed
Internet connections to long-distance phone service, as well as  
wireless.

And Mr. Whitacre now has access to the old
AT&T's enterprise business and world-wide network.

Such a deal would likely prompt howls of protest in some quarters  
as it
comes on the heels not only of the AT&T-SBC deal but also after  
Verizon
Communications Inc.'s acquisition of MCI. Those deals were approved  
with

only a few minor conditions despite concerns they would lead to higher
prices for business customers.
The wave of mergers has dramatically reshaped the telecom industry,  
and a
purchase of BellSouth would further cement the recreation of the  
old Ma

Bell, which the
government pushed to break up in 1984.

The management of AT&T, which has apparently briefed key senior  
government
officials late last week, appears to be betting that the Bush  
administration
and a Bell-friendly Federal Communications Commission won't raise  
too many

obstacles for such a deal, arguing that the companies serve different
geographic regions and do not currently compete with one another in a
significant way.

Although AT&T and Verizon's last mergers passed both FCC and Justice
Department review with little major problems, the latest proposed  
merger may
face more hurdles. Recent comments by AT&T and BellSouth executives  
about

their intentions to explore new revenue streams from their high-speed
Internet services by introducing two-tier or "premium" service for  
Internet

content providers. Concerns about those plans and the concept of "net
neutrality," or ensuring that consumers have open access to all  
Internet
sites and services and businesses do not find their content slowed,  
has

become a major problems for the Bells in Washington.

Meanwhile, the FCC that will be

[WISPA] RE: [isp-wireless] alternate power

[Alex Goldman]

Folks, Sascha Meinrath has a comprehensive post on this issue here:

http://cuwireless.net/node/100


courtesy of boingboing

http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/05/katrina_communicatio.html

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/