Re: [WISPA] Safety Harness
I might be interested on one but, where I can see a picture of what you have to see if is what I need. Thanks. On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 08:34 -0500, Blake Bowers wrote: At the risk of this being called an ad, I have a large box of brand new in the bag equipment fall protection harnesses. $40.00 includes priorty shipping. As one can see, this is not a money maker at this price, but if it can help people comply, and get them out of my warehouse all is good. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down here! Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today. - Original Message - From: rwf ralphli...@bsrg.org To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:22 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Safety Harness Martha Is this a climbing harness or a safety harness for a platform/bucket truck/aerial lift/roof etc? Others told you about the tower ones (I happen to prefer the DBI Sala for that) But the simpler one with only the rear D ring that is for the equipment I mentioned can also be had at Home Depot in a pinch. About $70.00 Reason I mention this is that some of us have bucket trucks or rent lifts as well and OSHA watches them too. We were just field inspected a few weeks ago. Ralph From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Martha Huizenga Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 10:00 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Safety Harness Can anyone tell me where they purchase Safety Harnesses? Is there a special kind or brand I should be looking for? Thanks Martha -- Martha Huizenga DC Access, LLC http://www.dcaccess.net 202-546-5898 Friendly, Local, Affordable, Internet! Connecting the Capitol Hill Community Join us on http://www.facebook.com/DCAccess Facebookor follow us on http://twitter.com/dcaccess Twitter WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] users...
I'm on the same boat. I added more bandwidth to my network and my users still saturate it. I'm doing traffic shapping and still. On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 02:42 -0500, Blair Davis wrote: a fun little note... three weeks ago, I doubled my networks available bandwidth... tonight, at 10:05PM EDT, those $#%@ users managed to saturate it again! Grrr WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 00:34 -0500, Blair Davis wrote: I use a lot of omni's... 5-10 cust each... The most radio's I have in one box is 3... one on 2.4GHz, one on 900MHz, one on 5.8GHz And one other with one on 2.4GHz, one on 5.3GHz, and one on 5.8GHz And my experience with pigtails has been the opposite... The black ones work well, the clear ones are junk... I've used 3 radios in the past but, had to change that setup later on. I had to install 2 on one rb433 and the other on another rb433. I've used both, the black and clear pigtails and so far they both work fine. YMMV On 2/14/2011 11:45 PM, ch...@htswireless.com wrote: That's just plain ignorant! 6 radios? I think the o=most I have ever attempted was 2 in one unit. I've heard too many horror stories...! Actually in this town there's another wisp using a vertical omni and a horizontal omni. Plus the town is only like 2k pop. I ran like that for the better part of a year until I finally got around to sectorizing. That only got delayed because a tower I leased space on got cut down Chris -Original Message- From: Optimum Wireless Services Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 8:25 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:59 -0600, ch...@htswireless.com wrote: My experience is that with the crappy little grey or black pigtails your signal sucks. The copper braided pigtails like the Laird/Pac ones seem to do great. Not that I 'm downing Wisp-router, but they have always carried the crappy ones. I have avoided ordering any pigtails from them for quite a while so I don't know if they are still shipping those. Roc-noc, Wlanparts, Titan, to name a few always seen to ship the good copper ones. I've had 72 clients connected to a Mikrotik AP running a horizontal omni with little performance issues besides that fact that it had 72 clients on it... :) Chris Wow! 72 clients on an omni. That's impressive. Thats probably the only antenna trasnmiting around that area. I have an omni with 20 clients and get all sort of interference problems. Well, I'm glad I got a lot of explanations from the list. I WILL be printing these to show my friend. I just learned he has 6 radios installed on a RB600. How about that for self interference -Original Message- From: Brian Webster Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:06 AM To: 'WISPA General List' ; wil...@optimumwireless.com Subject: Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic I agree with Fred. It's not about the number of clients that causes the problem. The physical separation of the radios is probably the key factor in the increased performance. Putting multiple radios with possibly leaky pigtails inside the same enclosure can introduce opportunities for self-interference by near field RF energies and mixing products. Unless an enclosure have been specifically designed, tested and built for that particular combination or radios and cable routing, there is no telling how it may or may not perform. Adding more radios to the MT just compounds the problem. Having the RF section outside the MT box is never a bad idea to avoid this phenomenon. Thank You, Brian Webster Skype: Radiowebst www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Fred Goldstein Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:35 AM To: wil...@optimumwireless.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic At 2/14/2011 08:50 AM, OptimumWS wrote: Hello. Thought I share this with the list. I have a friend that is using MT as ap on one of his towers with his radios in 10MHz and on another tower bullets with sector panels, similar set up on both towers except for the radios. He was explaining that he finds the bullets outperforms the ubiquiti radios on the MT by far. His explanation: The reason why bullets outperfoms the radios intalled on a router board is because of the pigtail used from the radio to the antenna. This pigtail works like a electricity cable in that the thicker the cable the more current is able to pass through so, the mikrotik pigtails are way too thin. When there is a certain number of clients connected to that radio the pigtail saturates the radio traffic because of the 'high traffic or current passing through the pigtail' and as a result; links between clients and ap can be slow and performance decreases. Now, the bullets do not have any pigtail or other connector and thats a reason why links with bullets are more stable and performs better than having a routerboard and radios with pigtails. What you guys think of his logic
[WISPA] My friend's logic
Hello. Thought I share this with the list. I have a friend that is using MT as ap on one of his towers with his radios in 10MHz and on another tower bullets with sector panels, similar set up on both towers except for the radios. He was explaining that he finds the bullets outperforms the ubiquiti radios on the MT by far. His explanation: The reason why bullets outperfoms the radios intalled on a router board is because of the pigtail used from the radio to the antenna. This pigtail works like a electricity cable in that the thicker the cable the more current is able to pass through so, the mikrotik pigtails are way too thin. When there is a certain number of clients connected to that radio the pigtail saturates the radio traffic because of the 'high traffic or current passing through the pigtail' and as a result; links between clients and ap can be slow and performance decreases. Now, the bullets do not have any pigtail or other connector and thats a reason why links with bullets are more stable and performs better than having a routerboard and radios with pigtails. What you guys think of his logic? Note: Posted this on dslreports wisp mainling list as well so, for those also registered to that list: sorry for the double posts. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:59 -0600, ch...@htswireless.com wrote: My experience is that with the crappy little grey or black pigtails your signal sucks. The copper braided pigtails like the Laird/Pac ones seem to do great. Not that I 'm downing Wisp-router, but they have always carried the crappy ones. I have avoided ordering any pigtails from them for quite a while so I don't know if they are still shipping those. Roc-noc, Wlanparts, Titan, to name a few always seen to ship the good copper ones. I've had 72 clients connected to a Mikrotik AP running a horizontal omni with little performance issues besides that fact that it had 72 clients on it... :) Chris Wow! 72 clients on an omni. That's impressive. Thats probably the only antenna trasnmiting around that area. I have an omni with 20 clients and get all sort of interference problems. Well, I'm glad I got a lot of explanations from the list. I WILL be printing these to show my friend. I just learned he has 6 radios installed on a RB600. How about that for self interference -Original Message- From: Brian Webster Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:06 AM To: 'WISPA General List' ; wil...@optimumwireless.com Subject: Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic I agree with Fred. It's not about the number of clients that causes the problem. The physical separation of the radios is probably the key factor in the increased performance. Putting multiple radios with possibly leaky pigtails inside the same enclosure can introduce opportunities for self-interference by near field RF energies and mixing products. Unless an enclosure have been specifically designed, tested and built for that particular combination or radios and cable routing, there is no telling how it may or may not perform. Adding more radios to the MT just compounds the problem. Having the RF section outside the MT box is never a bad idea to avoid this phenomenon. Thank You, Brian Webster Skype: Radiowebst www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Fred Goldstein Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:35 AM To: wil...@optimumwireless.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] My friend's logic At 2/14/2011 08:50 AM, OptimumWS wrote: Hello. Thought I share this with the list. I have a friend that is using MT as ap on one of his towers with his radios in 10MHz and on another tower bullets with sector panels, similar set up on both towers except for the radios. He was explaining that he finds the bullets outperforms the ubiquiti radios on the MT by far. His explanation: The reason why bullets outperfoms the radios intalled on a router board is because of the pigtail used from the radio to the antenna. This pigtail works like a electricity cable in that the thicker the cable the more current is able to pass through so, the mikrotik pigtails are way too thin. When there is a certain number of clients connected to that radio the pigtail saturates the radio traffic because of the 'high traffic or current passing through the pigtail' and as a result; links between clients and ap can be slow and performance decreases. Now, the bullets do not have any pigtail or other connector and thats a reason why links with bullets are more stable and performs better than having a routerboard and radios with pigtails. What you guys think of his logic? Note: Posted this on dslreports wisp mainling list as well so, for those also registered to that list: sorry for the double posts. This was discussed on some vendor forums too, I think UBNTs. Most pigtails shipped with radios are too cheap for their own good. They are not properly shielded. Some WISPs have found that they can put more radios on a tower if they use better pigtails, which they either make themselves or hand-select (one person found that Laird pigtails were sometimes good, but not all of them). Pigtails can be lossy, reducing effective antenna gain, and can leak, which makes it susceptible to local interference. This has nothing to do with the number of clients, though. That's just silly. -- Fred Goldsteink1io fgoldstein at ionary.com ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ +1 617 795 2701 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3443 - Release Date: 02/14/11
[WISPA] MikroTik as Load Balancer?
Hello. I was thinking of using MikroTik rb450g to balance four 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines to replace TP-Link TL-R480+ which locks up from time to time. Just wanted to know how many of you use MT routerOS for load balancing and how is working out for you. Thanks. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] MikroTik as Load Balancer?
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:29 -0200, Rubens Kuhl wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. I was thinking of using MikroTik rb450g to balance four 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines to replace TP-Link TL-R480+ which locks up from time to time. Just wanted to know how many of you use MT routerOS for load balancing and how is working out for you. You could use RB-750 which is much cheaper than RB-450G to balance that little traffic, or RB-750G if you want to have room for growth. It works just fine... nth+conn-mark rules can provide very good per-connection load-balancing, and the quirks of some sites/networks that require to use fail-over instead of load-balancing are also doable. I really prefer building blocks instead of final products to do loadbalancing stuff, as there will always be another thing that doesn't mix up with it and you can always make it work. For two uplinks, it would look like this: 0 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=RotaGrupoA passthrough=no in-interface=LAN connection-mark=ConexaoGrupoA 1 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=RotaGrupoB passthrough=no in-interface=LAN connection-mark=ConexaoGrupoB 2 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=ConexaoGrupoA passthrough=yes in-interface=LAN nth=2,1 3 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=RotaGrupoA passthrough=no in-interface=LAN connection-mark=ConexaoGrupoA 4 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=ConexaoGrupoB passthrough=yes in-interface=LAN 5 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=RotaGrupoB passthrough=no in-interface=LAN (and then two default routes, each one tiead to one of the routing marks) Four uplinks require more chains with nth=4,1 then nth=3,1, then nth=2,1 and then the last uplink. You will also need the no load-balance rules prior to this rule group doing some form of fail-over. Rubens Thanks Rubens for your reply. I was playing around with a spare rb433 doing something similar to what you just posted (nth+conn-mark rules) but, things were not working properly. I noticed my connections were really really slow, I don't know if I did something wrong. One other thing, how about fail over? If one line goes out would the other 3 work and that other line would be ignored until is back up? How can that be done? I would also love to prioritize traffic, SYN ACK flags and DNS be on the highest priority, etc... I know is too much but, would like to do something like that, I don't know if all these are doable at the same time. Any suggestions? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] content filtering as a premium service for subscribers
I've used squidguard and has worked really well. I have a script that updates the database every hour. On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:23 -0500, Justin Wilson wrote: WebSense is a good product. The thing about any type of web filtering is you have to keep on top of it. Companies such as Websense push out almost daily updates on new sites, false positives, etc. If you “roll your own” be prepared to be writing exceptions a lot. There are new web-sites everyday. Not only that you have new content everyday on exiting web-sites. The example I always use is a site that goes into detail about breast cancer. A simple solution may block the site one day, but not the next. Depends on what the author of the web-site wrote that day. My .02 is pay someone who has dedicated staff to do it for you. Justin -- Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net Aol Yahoo IM: j2sw http://www.mtin.net/blog – xISP News http://www.twitter.com/j2sw – Follow me on Twitter Wisp Consulting – Tower Climbing – Network Support __ From: Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:12:38 -0600 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] content filtering as a premium service for subscribers Anyone offering web content filtering as a premium service to subscribers? If so what have you found works best? We’ve had a few requests, and are trying to see if it is worthwhile. Thanks, Patrick Nix, Jr., Computer Network Solutions CSWEB.NET Internet Services IT Manager http://www.cnetworksolutions.com http://www.csweb.net (918) 235-0414 __ Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. __ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] How can I serve pages on frameset?
Hello. I don't know if this is the right place to ask about this issue, if is not then, please apologize. I have a small WISP in my town and I would like to offer free internet service at coffee shops, restaurant, and other public places but, this free service will have its limitations: All pages would have an advertisement or promotion on top just like NetZero used to do in the past. I think this is done with frameset but, don't know how to force this for all the pages. I would like to do this with php/mysql and if the user tries to remove the frame then maybe redirect them to pay per hour/day etc service. I have a linux gateway that runs squid and would like certain ip addresses (free ones) to view pages with this promo on top or even have pop ups from time to time whichever is easier. Thinking about it, maybe this can be done on apache server. Can this be done? If so, can you please provide any suggestions? Thanks in advanced for your help. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] How can I serve pages on frameset?
Never heard of silversplash but, I'll google it. I thought of implementing it myself with php and apache. Don't know how but, have a slight idea. I don't want to re-invent the wheel and the system I would use should be customizable. On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:26 -0500, Jerry Richardson wrote: Look at silversplash by silverlining. It is open source and is purpose built for this. Jerry Richardson Sent Mobile On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. I don't know if this is the right place to ask about this issue, if is not then, please apologize. I have a small WISP in my town and I would like to offer free internet service at coffee shops, restaurant, and other public places but, this free service will have its limitations: All pages would have an advertisement or promotion on top just like NetZero used to do in the past. I think this is done with frameset but, don't know how to force this for all the pages. I would like to do this with php/mysql and if the user tries to remove the frame then maybe redirect them to pay per hour/day etc service. I have a linux gateway that runs squid and would like certain ip addresses (free ones) to view pages with this promo on top or even have pop ups from time to time whichever is easier. Thinking about it, maybe this can be done on apache server. Can this be done? If so, can you please provide any suggestions? Thanks in advanced for your help. --- --- --- --- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- --- --- --- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Quick question
Hello. Just a quick stupid question: If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with 10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would they interfere with each other? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Quick question
I guess both on different channels: 20mhz on channel 1 and the other on channel 9. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:44 -0600, Cameron Crum wrote: What channels? On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. Just a quick stupid question: If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with 10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would they interfere with each other? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Quick question
Also, both antennas might be installed on the same tower next to each other. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:50 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: I guess both on different channels: 20mhz on channel 1 and the other on channel 9. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:44 -0600, Cameron Crum wrote: What channels? On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. Just a quick stupid question: If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with 10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would they interfere with each other? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
Marlon. That's exactly how things are in our network. Speedtest look good but, once the client goes to Facebook and Hotmail things just don't work well. Any solution or suggestions? On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:22 -0800, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Oh yeah, we'd run speed tests and they'd look great. Google would load right up etc. Reboot the router/radio and things would run fine for a little bit. Then try to go to MSN, Myspace, facebook etc. and things would die. marlon - Original Message - From: Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com To: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:34 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail I don't use Facebook much but, I had to lately in order to test the problem. Is actually a little slow from time to time. All other pages load fine. That's what I don't understand. I found this about facebook: http://www.5starsocialnetwork.com/facebook-connection-problems/ http://support.momentoapp.com/discussions/problems/106-problem-with-facebook-connection http://www.facebook.com/KnownIssues/posts/171845609509593 I'm puzzled at all this and is really getting on my nerves. I have people complaining about it. Thanks. On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 13:26 -0500, RickG wrote: Have you seen the actual problem for yourself? If so, does it do it at your core? On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. Lately my customers have been experiencing problems accessing facebook and hotmail. They claim they can't access their email on hotmail after entering their credentials and can't see pictures and other people's profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 customers and have complained so much about it that is already getting on me. Just wanted to know if any of you have experienced problems with these two websites. Thanks in advanced. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -RickG WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Quick question
We have 4 sector antennas on a couple of our towers but, they're getting too much noise and interference from all over the area. I'm wanted to install a bullet on each tower at 10Mhz so, I can transfer many of our ns2 to it. I can't do it on the panels because we have older equipment that don't support 10mhz. Can't go to 5.8ghz becuase we still don't have any 5.8 radio. I'm looking for ways to decrease latency which at times are extremely high, over 1000ms (very ridiculous). I have a tower with an omni on it and would like to add another omni on this one to try to do the same as with the others. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 09:58 -0500, Cameron Kilton wrote: Why do that next to each other, I don't see the point of two omni's next to each other and 10mhz and 20 mhz, why not sectors? Thanks, Cameron Kilton Project Manager Midcoast Internet Solutions http://www.midcoast.com c...@midcoast.com (207) 594-8277 x 108 On 12/2/2010 9:57 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: Also, both antennas might be installed on the same tower next to each other. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:50 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: I guess both on different channels: 20mhz on channel 1 and the other on channel 9. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:44 -0600, Cameron Crum wrote: What channels? On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. Just a quick stupid question: If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with 10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would they interfere with each other? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Quick question
I'm thinking of putting the additional Omni to try to ease things. If things work out well, then I'll just install other panels on 10mhz and any new install would be on 10mhz. Also, keep those old equipment on the 20mhz panels since we don't have the funds to replace them. Don't know if having 4 panels on 20mhz and probably 3 other sector on 10mhz might interfere. That's why my question about if having both on the same tower and closed to each other may cause problems. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:39 -0500, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: Are you thinking about putting the additional Omni/Bullet as a temp solution to decommission the older radio/sector to some newer radio / sectors ? You will have to try it.. you might be able to do that If you are thinking of this as a long term solution... then keep in mind Omni Antenna(s), Noise from All Sides... are two dirty words that are a disaster waiting to happen .. .kinda like 'drinking driving'. :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom On 12/2/2010 10:29 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: We have 4 sector antennas on a couple of our towers but, they're getting too much noise and interference from all over the area. I'm wanted to install a bullet on each tower at 10Mhz so, I can transfer many of our ns2 to it. I can't do it on the panels because we have older equipment that don't support 10mhz. Can't go to 5.8ghz becuase we still don't have any 5.8 radio. I'm looking for ways to decrease latency which at times are extremely high, over 1000ms (very ridiculous). I have a tower with an omni on it and would like to add another omni on this one to try to do the same as with the others. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 09:58 -0500, Cameron Kilton wrote: Why do that next to each other, I don't see the point of two omni's next to each other and 10mhz and 20 mhz, why not sectors? Thanks, Cameron Kilton Project Manager Midcoast Internet Solutions http://www.midcoast.com c...@midcoast.com (207) 594-8277 x 108 On 12/2/2010 9:57 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: Also, both antennas might be installed on the same tower next to each other. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:50 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: I guess both on different channels: 20mhz on channel 1 and the other on channel 9. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:44 -0600, Cameron Crum wrote: What channels? On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. Just a quick stupid question: If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with 10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would they interfere with each other? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] [TowerTalk] Breaking all the tower climbing rulesatanamazingheight...
Everytime I see that video, my knees shake. On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:52 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: No such thing as the Sears Tower. It is Willis Tower now ;) On Dec 2, 2010 9:38 AM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote: And I like how the brilliant people who made the video don't even know it's a guyed tower not a guided tower (near the beginning where they are comparing it against the Sears and Eiffel Towers). Where are they guiding it? Cameron On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Schmidt jeschm...@jeschmidt.comwrote: ...the Morse is unusual...I thought I heard the German umlaut U in the beginning (with the two dots over it) as DI DI DAH DAH which isn't Morse for anything in our alphabet. I wonder where this was made. . . . j o n a t h a n W8BZB -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 5:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] [TowerTalk] Breaking all the tower climbing rulesatanamazingheight... We've had several threads on this. Scary every time I watch it. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com wrote: OY! I can't even watch that video. Those guys are just plain nuts. marlon - Original Message - From: Mark Robinson mark...@mindspring.com To: Tom Osborne w7...@frontier.com Cc: towert...@contesting.com Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Breaking all the tower climbing rules atanamazingheight... There was a death a while back when a climber fell and it looked like one of those climbing pegs had rusted through and had snapped off when weight was put on it Mark N1UK - Original Message - From: Tom Osborne w7...@frontier.com To: Towertalk towert...@contesting.com Sent: Wednesday, 01 December, 2010 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Breaking all the tower climbing rules at anamazingheight... Watching them go up the last 50 feet or so made me wonder just what would happen if one of those climbing pegs snapped off. Be a LONG way down. At that height seems like they would get kinda rusty. 73 Tom W7WHY Seems to be a commercial operation. I guess the OSHA inspector couldn't (wouldn't) make an on-site inspection. Also, note the porcupine dissipators on the way up. http://www.liveleak.com/mp53/player.swf?config=http://www.liveleak.com/mp5 3/player_config.php?token=f2d_1284588370% 26embed=1http://www.liveleak.com/mp53/player.swf?config=http://www.liveleak.com/mp5%0A3/player_config.php?token=f2d_1284588370%26embed=1 73, Joe K2XX ___ ___ TowerTalk mailing list towert...@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ___ ___ TowerTalk mailing list towert...@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ___ ___ TowerTalk mailing list towert...@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk -- -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
I disabled squid and noticed facebook worked fine but, after hours it was the same: sluggish and slow. Matt can I just add an alias to my external network interface and do something like you mentioned? Could it be nat? On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:38 -0700, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: I don't know whether it helps or not, but we put in policy routes so that every four or eight routed subnets were NATed out through a different IP address. Something like: 192.168.248.0-192.168.255.0 goes out through 208.14.222.10 192.168.240.0-192.168.247.0 goes out through 208.14.222.11 etc etc Since putting these rules in, a lot of our NAT issues have gone away. We have a LOT of customers on Facebook and Hotmail, and they get very vocal when stuff isn't working, so I know that it is working well for the most part. This is on a StarOS NAT box, but we are going to be replacing it with Mikrotik in another month or so. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com On 11/26/2010 9:16 AM, Jason Hensley wrote: Hmm, I ran into issues with NAT'ing that many customers too. I had to break it out better than what I had. My issues were similar to what you're seeing - just really unpredictable behavior from some sites. Was going over the max possible NAT connections. I'm pretty sure this was on a Mikrotik at the time, but it's been a few years back so I can't remember all the details. With this many customers I would be looking at something better than ADSL connections. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Optimum Wireless Services Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 10:10 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail Yes. I'm doing NAT for the entire network. Someone suggested to upgrade to the squid ver 3.1. I was using 3.0.24. Upgraded and will run the newer version and see how things work. I need squid on the network to save a little bit of bw. Also I'm running videocache which needs squid. I'll let you know how things go from here. On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 09:57 -0600, Matt wrote: profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 Just curious, do you NAT everyone? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
I'm suspecting squid might be the problem. I disabled squid and I'm just forwarding and things look better. Now, I will test it this evening when more people are connected. Without squid I'm able to throttle upload traffic so, that might be another reason why things may work better. On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 11:57 -0800, Chuck Profito wrote: Agreed, everyone gets different photo and messages depending who their associated to. it would probably drive the squid nuts, especially when FB is busy and slow and squid is trying to compare. BTW, Watch out on not controlling the upload, one sub ftp'ing out or P2P could kill your full download. I'm guessing, but, you are probably only 1/2 duplex. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 11:08 AM To: wil...@optimumwireless.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail Could be your squid cache. Sent from my iPhone4 On Nov 25, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Travis, thanks for replying. I first thought I didn't have enough bandwidth but, I have three 5meg lines. Previously I only had 2 and things were worst. After adding the additional line things got better but, not really good. Our three lines are connected to tp-link load balancer then to our gw running debian which throttles user's bandwithd at 512kbps download, not able to throttle upload bw yet. Also this gw is running squid for cache. You still think I need to add another line? On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 07:42 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: I would guess you are running out of bandwidth. 5meg isn't much for 120 customers, especially since most of them are probably trying to use it at nearly the same time (6:00PM - 10:00PM). Travis Microserv On 11/25/2010 6:45 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: Hello. Lately my customers have been experiencing problems accessing facebook and hotmail. They claim they can't access their email on hotmail after entering their credentials and can't see pictures and other people's profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 customers and have complained so much about it that is already getting on me. Just wanted to know if any of you have experienced problems with these two websites. Thanks in advanced. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
Yes. I'm doing NAT for the entire network. Someone suggested to upgrade to the squid ver 3.1. I was using 3.0.24. Upgraded and will run the newer version and see how things work. I need squid on the network to save a little bit of bw. Also I'm running videocache which needs squid. I'll let you know how things go from here. On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 09:57 -0600, Matt wrote: profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 Just curious, do you NAT everyone? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
I'm not using MikroTik for the gw. I'm running it on a Debian Lenny box with an iptables script. Look into tcp max connections maybe? On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:16 -0600, Jason Hensley wrote: Hmm, I ran into issues with NAT'ing that many customers too. I had to break it out better than what I had. My issues were similar to what you're seeing - just really unpredictable behavior from some sites. Was going over the max possible NAT connections. I'm pretty sure this was on a Mikrotik at the time, but it's been a few years back so I can't remember all the details. With this many customers I would be looking at something better than ADSL connections. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Optimum Wireless Services Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 10:10 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail Yes. I'm doing NAT for the entire network. Someone suggested to upgrade to the squid ver 3.1. I was using 3.0.24. Upgraded and will run the newer version and see how things work. I need squid on the network to save a little bit of bw. Also I'm running videocache which needs squid. I'll let you know how things go from here. On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 09:57 -0600, Matt wrote: profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 Just curious, do you NAT everyone? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
Hello. Lately my customers have been experiencing problems accessing facebook and hotmail. They claim they can't access their email on hotmail after entering their credentials and can't see pictures and other people's profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 customers and have complained so much about it that is already getting on me. Just wanted to know if any of you have experienced problems with these two websites. Thanks in advanced. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
Travis, thanks for replying. I first thought I didn't have enough bandwidth but, I have three 5meg lines. Previously I only had 2 and things were worst. After adding the additional line things got better but, not really good. Our three lines are connected to tp-link load balancer then to our gw running debian which throttles user's bandwithd at 512kbps download, not able to throttle upload bw yet. Also this gw is running squid for cache. You still think I need to add another line? On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 07:42 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: I would guess you are running out of bandwidth. 5meg isn't much for 120 customers, especially since most of them are probably trying to use it at nearly the same time (6:00PM - 10:00PM). Travis Microserv On 11/25/2010 6:45 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: Hello. Lately my customers have been experiencing problems accessing facebook and hotmail. They claim they can't access their email on hotmail after entering their credentials and can't see pictures and other people's profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 customers and have complained so much about it that is already getting on me. Just wanted to know if any of you have experienced problems with these two websites. Thanks in advanced. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
I don't use Facebook much but, I had to lately in order to test the problem. Is actually a little slow from time to time. All other pages load fine. That's what I don't understand. I found this about facebook: http://www.5starsocialnetwork.com/facebook-connection-problems/ http://support.momentoapp.com/discussions/problems/106-problem-with-facebook-connection http://www.facebook.com/KnownIssues/posts/171845609509593 I'm puzzled at all this and is really getting on my nerves. I have people complaining about it. Thanks. On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 13:26 -0500, RickG wrote: Have you seen the actual problem for yourself? If so, does it do it at your core? On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Hello. Lately my customers have been experiencing problems accessing facebook and hotmail. They claim they can't access their email on hotmail after entering their credentials and can't see pictures and other people's profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 customers and have complained so much about it that is already getting on me. Just wanted to know if any of you have experienced problems with these two websites. Thanks in advanced. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -RickG WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail
It makes sense. But, according to the squid-user mailing list is not a problem with squid. I haven't test it without squid yet. I'll have to wait until the weekend to work on that. BTW, Happy Thanksgiving day to everyone! On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 11:57 -0800, Chuck Profito wrote: Agreed, everyone gets different photo and messages depending who their associated to. it would probably drive the squid nuts, especially when FB is busy and slow and squid is trying to compare. BTW, Watch out on not controlling the upload, one sub ftp'ing out or P2P could kill your full download. I'm guessing, but, you are probably only 1/2 duplex. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 11:08 AM To: wil...@optimumwireless.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with facebook and hotmail Could be your squid cache. Sent from my iPhone4 On Nov 25, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Optimum Wireless Services wil...@optimumwireless.com wrote: Travis, thanks for replying. I first thought I didn't have enough bandwidth but, I have three 5meg lines. Previously I only had 2 and things were worst. After adding the additional line things got better but, not really good. Our three lines are connected to tp-link load balancer then to our gw running debian which throttles user's bandwithd at 512kbps download, not able to throttle upload bw yet. Also this gw is running squid for cache. You still think I need to add another line? On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 07:42 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: I would guess you are running out of bandwidth. 5meg isn't much for 120 customers, especially since most of them are probably trying to use it at nearly the same time (6:00PM - 10:00PM). Travis Microserv On 11/25/2010 6:45 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote: Hello. Lately my customers have been experiencing problems accessing facebook and hotmail. They claim they can't access their email on hotmail after entering their credentials and can't see pictures and other people's profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120 customers and have complained so much about it that is already getting on me. Just wanted to know if any of you have experienced problems with these two websites. Thanks in advanced. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Brute Force Attacks
I've been getting attacked as well but, it has decreased after I took some mearsures. I changed the ssh server not to accept root login: PermitRootLogin no Also installed fail2ban and on top of that created a script that would block ip addresses I find in the log: BAD=/etc/badIp IPS=$(cat $BAD) $iptables --delete-chain blockBadIp $iptables -N blockBadIp $iptables -F blockBadIp # $iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -s $iptables -A blockBadIp -j DROP for i in $IPS do $iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i $EXT_IFACE -s $i -j blockBadIp $iptables -A INPUT -p udp -i $EXT_IFACE -s $i -j blockBadIp done On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 00:26 -0400, Robert West wrote: Brute force attack. Various user names, various passwords. Dictionary attack. Seems to be happening all the time now. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Piehn Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:06 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Brute Force Attacks What do you consider a brute force attack? We tarpit traffic coming into our network on ssh, ftp, etc. then put an exception list for known server customers. I am always looking to identify and block extra stuff at our border Scott Piehn - Original Message - From: RickG To: WISPA General List Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 9:44 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Brute Force Attacks Not here. What ip range? On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote: Is it just me or is everyone having their gateway servers attacked by those Chinese so-and so’s? (WISPA REGS) My logs show attacks all weekend on all of my MT gateways. Sad Never had that before. Even the Routerboard I use at the house. RELENTLESS! Just sharing They get swatted off so it’s all good but it’s interesting to watch their attack Moving on. Steve- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ __ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
