Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread Mike Hammett
It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify 
something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I read
on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations in
your area?

Thanks,

Michiana Wireless, Inc.
John Buwa, President

http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
574-233-7170

Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

*US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Charles Wu
 Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...

 Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
 those depending on the type of traffic)

 ---
 WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
 Coming to a City Near You
 http://www.winog.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Jeff Booher
 Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field



 Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
 GPS
 settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
 of
 interference.




 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
 reliance or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly
 prohibited. If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
 delete all
 copies.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 John,

 From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
 GPS
 sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
 be
 timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
 to be
 certified.

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John Rock
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
 their
 networks over the next 1-3 years.
 Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
 do
 the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist
 with
 each other all over the USA.
 CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz
 and
 yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be
 dictated by

 availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable
 3.65
 networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
 everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
 place

 for this to happen.

 Hurdles...
 -CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
 -Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
 competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
 -Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with
 each
 other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge
 this
 does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in
 the
 3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist
 between
 base stations along with the interoperability standards they are
 developing.

 The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

 Thanks,

 John Rock
 Wireless Connections
 Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
 ofc. 419.660.6100
 cell 419-706-7356
 fax  419-668-4077
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net
 This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain
 confidential
 and/or privileged information and intended only for the named
 recipient. If
 you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure,
 copying

 or any use of the information or files contained is strictly
 prohibited. If
 you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
 by
 reply transmission and delete

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread reader
Can anyone explain why the rule would encourage spectrum hogging?Use 
wider channel = get more eirp???




insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I 
 read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Charles Wu
 Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...

 Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
 those depending on the type of traffic)

 ---
 WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
 Coming to a City Near You
 http://www.winog.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Jeff Booher
 Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field



 Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
 GPS
 settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
 of
 interference.




 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
 reliance or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly
 prohibited. If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
 delete all
 copies.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 John,

 From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
 GPS
 sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
 be
 timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
 to be
 certified.

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John Rock
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
 their
 networks over the next 1-3 years.
 Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
 do
 the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist
 with
 each other all over the USA.
 CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz
 and
 yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be
 dictated by

 availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable
 3.65
 networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
 everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
 place

 for this to happen.

 Hurdles...
 -CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
 -Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
 competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
 -Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with
 each
 other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge
 this
 does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in
 the
 3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist
 between
 base stations along with the interoperability standards they are
 developing.

 The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

 Thanks,

 John Rock
 Wireless Connections
 Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
 ofc. 419.660.6100
 cell 419-706-7356
 fax  419-668-4077
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net
 This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain
 confidential
 and/or privileged information

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread John Scrivner
The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how they
got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone out
of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I see
what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
involving spectrum policy.
Scriv


On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager, North America
  www.apertonet.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  24/7: 206-455-4950
 
  This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
  work
  product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
  reliance or
  distribution by others without express permission is strictly
  prohibited. If
  you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
  delete all
  copies.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  John,
 
  From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
  GPS
  sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
  be
  timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
  to be
  certified.
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of John Rock
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
  their
  networks over the next 1-3 years.
  Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
  do
  the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist
  with
  each other all over the USA.
  CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz
  and
  yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be
  dictated by
 
  availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable
  3.65
  networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
  everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
  place
 
  for this to happen.
 
  Hurdles...
  -CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
  -Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
  competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
  -Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with
  each
  other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge
  this
  does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in
  the
  3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist
  between
  base stations along

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread Gino Villarini
My same way of thinking, what the fcc was thinking?

gino

-Original Message-
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 2:49 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how they
got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone out
of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I see
what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
involving spectrum policy.
Scriv


On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager, North America
  www.apertonet.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  24/7: 206-455-4950
 
  This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
  work
  product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
  reliance or
  distribution by others without express permission is strictly
  prohibited. If
  you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
  delete all
  copies.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  John,
 
  From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
  GPS
  sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
  be
  timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
  to be
  certified.
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of John Rock
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
  their
  networks over the next 1-3 years.
  Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
  do
  the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist
  with
  each other all over the USA.
  CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz
  and
  yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be
  dictated by
 
  availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable
  3.65
  networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
  everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
  place
 
  for this to happen.
 
  Hurdles...
  -CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
  -Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
  competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
  -Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with
  each
  other so UL

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm not an engineer, but from what I understand when you apply 20 dBm to 
channels of different widths, the same gross power is spread out. Each Hz 
receives less power in a wider channel.  This rule allows the larger 
channels to not face the power punishment.

Spectral efficiency has little to do with the channel width and more with 
the technology.  You can use an Atheros chipset to produce channel widths of 
5, 10, 20, and 40 MHz, but they all traffic roughly the same bits/Hz.

Squashing the entire band is something that'll happen when you're given such 
small bands and attempting to push big data over it.  That's where the 
contention requirements and synch of some kind come in to play.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
 should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
 channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
 little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how they
 got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
 also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone out
 of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I see
 what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
 involving spectrum policy.
 Scriv


 On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I 
 read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations 
 in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager, North America
  www.apertonet.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  24/7: 206-455-4950
 
  This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
  work
  product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
  reliance or
  distribution by others without express permission is strictly
  prohibited. If
  you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
  delete all
  copies.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  John,
 
  From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
  GPS
  sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
  be
  timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
  to be
  certified.
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of John Rock
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
  their
  networks over the next 1-3 years.
  Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
  do
  the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread Harold Bledsoe
Right, Mike.  The FCC's thinking appears to be power density and not
just straight power.  This is why, with the same power, you will see
roughly a 3dB RX increase from cutting the channel size in half.

-Hal

-Original Message-
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:33:56 -0500

I'm not an engineer, but from what I understand when you apply 20 dBm to 
channels of different widths, the same gross power is spread out. Each Hz 
receives less power in a wider channel.  This rule allows the larger 
channels to not face the power punishment.

Spectral efficiency has little to do with the channel width and more with 
the technology.  You can use an Atheros chipset to produce channel widths of 
5, 10, 20, and 40 MHz, but they all traffic roughly the same bits/Hz.

Squashing the entire band is something that'll happen when you're given such 
small bands and attempting to push big data over it.  That's where the 
contention requirements and synch of some kind come in to play.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
 should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
 channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
 little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how they
 got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
 also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone out
 of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I see
 what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
 involving spectrum policy.
 Scriv


 On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I 
 read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations 
 in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager, North America
  www.apertonet.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  24/7: 206-455-4950
 
  This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
  work
  product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
  reliance or
  distribution by others without express permission is strictly
  prohibited. If
  you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
  delete all
  copies.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  John,
 
  From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
  GPS
  sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
  be
  timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
  to be
  certified.
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
Shannon theorm states that a channel capacity is constrained by the 
following equation:
C=B log(2)(1+S/N)

Where the capacity of the channel is C, B is the bandwidth of the channel, S 
is signal and N is noise.
Rearranging terms and holding some things constant.  Lets consider noise and 
signal =1 (constant power) then Channel capacity is directly proportional to 
bandwidth.  Or if we make B = 1 and noise =1 then Channel capacity is log 
proportional to signal level.

So, want more channel capacity; use more signal strength or a wider 
bandwidth.  But expanding either one will give you more capacity.  The 
number you will actually get for C if you compute it is much more than you 
really do get with real radios.  That says to me that there is a lot of room 
for improvement in radio technology.

But if you try wider bandwidths alone, that method will allow more noise in 
the channel.

P=kTBr Where T is temperature and B is bandwidth and P is noise power (I 
think k is boltsmans constantant and r is resistance).  No free lunch there.

So going to a wider bandwidth alone will cause the S/N ratio to lower 
reducing capacity.  So, you gotta increase the signal a certain amount to 
overcome the noise.


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 I'm not an engineer, but from what I understand when you apply 20 dBm to
 channels of different widths, the same gross power is spread out. Each Hz
 receives less power in a wider channel.  This rule allows the larger
 channels to not face the power punishment.e

 Spectral efficiency has little to do with the channel width and more with
 the technology.  You can use an Atheros chipset to produce channel widths 
 of
 5, 10, 20, and 40 MHz, but they all traffic roughly the same bits/Hz.

 Squashing the entire band is something that'll happen when you're given 
 such
 small bands and attempting to push big data over it.  That's where the
 contention requirements and synch of some kind come in to play.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
 should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
 channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
 little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how 
 they
 got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
 also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone 
 out
 of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I 
 see
 what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
 involving spectrum policy.
 Scriv


 On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC 
 on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I
 read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations
 in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and 
  similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread reader
Then could someone explain how this works out in real life?

The problem I have here, is that it appears that if we deploy some 3 or 5 
mhz channels, we're going to be severely hampered EIRP-wise, from reaching 
any distance at all.

Now, the UBNT XR3's are certified for a 5, 10, and 20 mzh channel, but 
according to them, the 20 is really 17, due to the low power transmitted at 
the edge.  So, a 10 would be 8.5, for instance.   But, the cards are 
certified for one set of antennas and one power output for all three sizes.

It just isn't very high, backhauls would need to be under 15 miles to keep 
the signal level up.






insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Right, Mike.  The FCC's thinking appears to be power density and not
 just straight power.  This is why, with the same power, you will see
 roughly a 3dB RX increase from cutting the channel size in half.

 -Hal

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:33:56 -0500

 I'm not an engineer, but from what I understand when you apply 20 dBm to
 channels of different widths, the same gross power is spread out. Each Hz
 receives less power in a wider channel.  This rule allows the larger
 channels to not face the power punishment.

 Spectral efficiency has little to do with the channel width and more with
 the technology.  You can use an Atheros chipset to produce channel widths 
 of
 5, 10, 20, and 40 MHz, but they all traffic roughly the same bits/Hz.

 Squashing the entire band is something that'll happen when you're given 
 such
 small bands and attempting to push big data over it.  That's where the
 contention requirements and synch of some kind come in to play.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
 should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
 channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
 little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how 
 they
 got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
 also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone 
 out
 of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I 
 see
 what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
 involving spectrum policy.
 Scriv


 On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC 
 on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I
 read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations
 in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and 
  similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager, North America
  www.apertonet.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
Fully agree John.  All this does was reproduce the Wmux/tsunami problem that 
plaqued 2.4 and 5.8 WISPs.

Important that when we pitch lite licensed like 3650, that we are only 
talking about the AP registration, and part90, and NOT the power level 
rules.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 The FCC must have been asleep when they set the rule this way. The rule
 should have been the opposite. If you want high power then use narrow
 channels and become more spectrally efficient. I am going to try to get a
 little face time with Julie Knapp and see if he can explain to me how they
 got this so backward. Maximum channel sizes would have been a good thing
 also to stop someone from building a radio which could squash everyone out
 of the band in one sector  or omni alone. I am scared sometimes when I see
 what comes from those who are supposed to be the leaders of our country
 involving spectrum policy.
 Scriv


 On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Mike Hammett 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It's 1 watt per MHz of channel width.  It's up to the FCC to certify
 something for more than 20 MHz of channel space.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
 3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I 
 read
 on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
 base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations 
 in
 your area?

 Thanks,

 Michiana Wireless, Inc.
 John Buwa, President

 http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
 574-233-7170

 Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

 *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Charles Wu
  Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
  Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
  those depending on the type of traffic)
 
  ---
  WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
  Coming to a City Near You
  http://www.winog.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Jeff Booher
  Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
  Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
  GPS
  settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
  of
  interference.
 
 
 
 
  Jeff Booher
 
  Channel Manager, North America
  www.apertonet.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  24/7: 206-455-4950
 
  This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
  work
  product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
  reliance or
  distribution by others without express permission is strictly
  prohibited. If
  you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
  delete all
  copies.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  John,
 
  From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
  GPS
  sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
  be
  timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
  to be
  certified.
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of John Rock
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
  their
  networks over the next 1-3 years.
  Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
  do
  the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist
  with
  each other all over the USA.
  CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz
  and
  yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be
  dictated by
 
  availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable
  3.65
  networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
  everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
  place
 
  for this to happen

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-26 Thread Sales
Sorry to Hijack this but what was the final EIRP determined by the FCC on
3.65? I remember they were talking about allowing 24 watts I believe I read
on the site somewhere. Lastly where on the fcc site do you register your
base stations? What about searching the site for deployed base stations in
your area?

Thanks,

Michiana Wireless, Inc.
John Buwa, President
 
http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
574-233-7170
 
Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!

*US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Charles Wu
 Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:04 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...
 
 Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures
 those depending on the type of traffic)
 
 ---
 WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
 Coming to a City Near You
 http://www.winog.com
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Jeff Booher
 Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
 
 Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar
 GPS
 settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues
 of
 interference.
 
 
 
 
 Jeff Booher
 
 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950
 
 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
 reliance or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly
 prohibited. If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
 delete all
 copies.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 John,
 
 From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
 GPS
 sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can
 be
 timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment
 to be
 certified.
 
 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John Rock
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into
 their
 networks over the next 1-3 years.
 Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they
 do
 the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist
 with
 each other all over the USA.
 CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz
 and
 yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be
 dictated by
 
 availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable
 3.65
 networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
 everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
 place
 
 for this to happen.
 
 Hurdles...
 -CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
 -Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
 competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
 -Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with
 each
 other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge
 this
 does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in
 the
 3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist
 between
 base stations along with the interoperability standards they are
 developing.
 
 The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.
 
 Thanks,
 
 John Rock
 Wireless Connections
 Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
 ofc. 419.660.6100
 cell 419-706-7356
 fax  419-668-4077
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net
 This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain
 confidential
 and/or privileged information and intended only for the named
 recipient. If
 you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure,
 copying
 
 or any use of the information or files contained is strictly
 prohibited. If
 you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
 by
 reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
 - Original Message -
 From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
  Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the
  average WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP
  market

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-25 Thread Charles Wu
That's a lot easier *SAID* than done...

Especially when you factor in frame rates / etc (as one configures those 
depending on the type of traffic)

---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Booher
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:37 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field



Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar GPS
settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues of
interference.




Jeff Booher

Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950

This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

John,

From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same
GPS
sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can be
timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment to be
certified.

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Rock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by

availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place

for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing.

The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying

or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the
 average WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP
 market doesn't need, but really drives up the price (I think its
 supposed to do 6 9's for
 availability?)

 It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Which is not your average WISP...


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
 assuming you are talking about

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-24 Thread Jeff Booher


Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar GPS
settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues of
interference. 

 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

John,

From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same 
GPS
sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can be
timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment to be
certified. 

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Rock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by

availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place

for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing.

The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying

or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the 
 average WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP 
 market doesn't need, but really drives up the price (I think its 
 supposed to do 6 9's for
 availability?)

 It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Which is not your average WISP...


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually 
 assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the 
 MFR's are able to and willing to come down in price considerably when 
 frame orders or larger deployments are taken into consideration.


 Best Regards,


 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-24 Thread Jeff Booher
Also I forgot- frame size should be the same as well. For example, 10msec
frames vs 5msec 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Booher
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 12:37 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field



Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar GPS
settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues of
interference. 

 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

John,

From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same 
GPS
sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can be
timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment to be
certified. 

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Rock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by

availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place

for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing.

The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying

or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the 
 average WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP 
 market doesn't need, but really drives up the price (I think its 
 supposed to do 6 9's for
 availability?)

 It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Which is not your average WISP...


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeff

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-24 Thread Scottie Arnett
I think we should give Jeff some credit...he is sorta trolling...but at least 
he is giving us the information we need! I respect that when I am looking at 
3.65 stuff. I have not heard many other 3.65 MFG's chime in. I am really 
undecided in the matter...but a coexistent of MFG's would solve my dilemma 
really fast!

Scottie

-- Original Message --
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:40:21 -0700

Also I forgot- frame size should be the same as well. For example, 10msec
frames vs 5msec 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Booher
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 12:37 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field



Having a competitor use the same upload and download ratios and similar GPS
settings will yes, make it so operators can coexist without the issues of
interference. 

 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

John,

From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same 
GPS
sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can be
timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment to be
certified. 

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Rock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by

availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place

for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing.

The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying

or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the 
 average WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP 
 market doesn't need, but really drives up the price (I think its 
 supposed

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Mike Cowan
I believe we were at 37dbm EIRP at both ends of the link.  I agree 
that we can't change physics and I expected the same letdown that we 
all had when OFDM hit the scenes for 5.8ghz.  All the tests I 
mentioned were using Alvarions base station with 2nd order 
diversity.  2nd order nets a 3db increase in transmit power and 12 db 
increase in uplink.  4th order is a 6db and 19 db increase on 
rx!  Add subchannelization on top of this and I begin to see where 
the manufacturers R  D money went.  We are trying to better 
characterize how 3.650 propogates with no diversity, 2nd order, and 
4th order as well as comparing same to 900Mhz.  To that end we have 
installed 3.650 and 900 on the same tower, same AGL at 37 and 36 
EIRP.  Initial results within 1/2 mile show that 900 bests 3.650 from 
a signal strength perspective, but 3.650 normally has better 
thruput.  However there is a section northeast of the tower that is a 
forest very close to the tower and behind that forest 3.650 coverage 
is spotty and 900 is fair.  3.650 apparently does not like its 
nearfield impacted.  Out at the 2 mile range is where this begins to 
get interesting.  3.650 bests 900 on an RSSI measurement at all 
points tested.  Of course 3.650 bested on performance at those 
locations as well.

Scottie had asked about hilly terrain and I want to test in that 
environment.  My gut tells me no go through a hill but I have seen so 
many good links at locations non wimax gear couldn't go that I am not 
ready to follow my gut and say no way to hills.  We are going to put 
Wimax into a large coal mine application which is no tress and BIG 
holes in the ground.  Propogation analysis shows we will need 5 base 
stations to cover the target area.  I am betting that 2 or 3 bases 
will actually do the job once we begin the field testing.

We also just completed field measurements of a 3.650 install.  In 
this project we created a 2 meter High resolution Propogation study 
to predict coverage.  Once these studies are tuned with real world 
field measurements we expect to see a predicted vs actual RSSI 
variance of less than 3db.  We will also then begin to understand 
what real world attenuation values an oak vs a maple tree 
represent.  These 1 or 2 meter studies are flat awesome.  Through our 
in house process we generate trees and buildings as clutter + 
anything else of value to the prediction.  Now the application knows 
about every tree, even the one in the curblawn.  We are doing a high 
res extraction for our test site and will do an analysis at 900, and 
3.650 using each variant of diversity.  This data will be correlated 
and tuned for actual field results.  I will make that data available 
once it is complete and that will tell a black and white story of 
what one can expect from the tested configurations.

I am seeing that Wimax is a little harder to predict coverage as 
accurately as a traditional radio.  What we are seeing is the prop 
model shows no coverage, field experience tells us that the model is 
correct.  Field testing shows that we have Wimax coverage where we 
believe we should not.  We may need to move to a 3D Ray Tracing model 
to more accurately predict Wimax, but this increases our processing 
time by a factor of 3 :-(.  Luckily we have the best software 
available and it allows us considerable flexibility, not for the 
faint of heart though, I think at last tally we have over 500K invested :-(.


Mike





At 03:33 AM 7/22/2008, you wrote:


insert witty tagline here

- Original Message -
From: Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:06 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 
  Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB
  download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test
  5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted
  on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not
  pass data and could just barely maintain association.

I'm aware of the attenuation of trees on 5 ghz.   It's deadly serious :)

But the question I have is...  Exactly what EIRP at the acess point, and
what at the client?

Adjusting the MAC does not magically change the physics of how or why RF
does or does not get attenuated by trees or dirt or buildings, or whatever.
I realize you can improve signal propagation and decoding reliability with
OFDM, but it does not violate the law of RF and attenuation.

On hte other hand, if you build a good enough front end, you can use
extraordinary sensitivity to hear and decode the RF signals at very low
levels.  So, that all being said,  What was the EIRP at the AP and CPE end?

Does anyone here have solid information on the attentuation of 3.65 ghz t
hrough trees?   A random guess would put it between 2.4 ghz and 5 ghz, but
perahps wavelenth at that frequency is amenable to penetration of foliage -
lower than I would expect

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Randy Cosby
Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?

http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82 

I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?


Randy


3-dB Networks wrote:
 I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
 Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork to
 become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list are).

 I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too me...
 basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the company
 thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as extensive
 as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
 i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line of
 sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
 through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When I
 try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!

 We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
 company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
 market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.

 I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug 6th
 to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
 impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
 promising me is on its way out)

 Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John McDowell
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
 you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   
 What about APs?

 John McDowell wrote:

 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
 
 that
   
 it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 
 3.65.
   
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
 performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread 3-dB Networks
Tranzeo and Aperto are not collaborating at all (actually Tranzeo wanted to
rebrand the product their own).

What is going on is they are using the same manufacturer.  The PS and Case
are the same, beyond that everything on the inside is Aperto.

Trust me, I was very concerned about this when I was meeting with them.

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:59 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?

http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82 

I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?


Randy


3-dB Networks wrote:
 I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
 Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork
to
 become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list
are).

 I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too me...
 basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the
company
 thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as
extensive
 as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
 i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line
of
 sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
 through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When I
 try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!

 We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
 company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
 market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.

 I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug
6th
 to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
 impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
 promising me is on its way out)

 Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John McDowell
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
 you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   
 What about APs?

 John McDowell wrote:

 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of
72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
 
 that
   
 it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 
 3.65.
   
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on
a
 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
 performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 


 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/


 


 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 


 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Harold Bledsoe
Which picture matches?

http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html

-Hal

-Original Message-
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0600

Tranzeo and Aperto are not collaborating at all (actually Tranzeo wanted to
rebrand the product their own).

What is going on is they are using the same manufacturer.  The PS and Case
are the same, beyond that everything on the inside is Aperto.

Trust me, I was very concerned about this when I was meeting with them.

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:59 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?

http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82 

I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?


Randy


3-dB Networks wrote:
 I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
 Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork
to
 become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list
are).

 I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too me...
 basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the
company
 thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as
extensive
 as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
 i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line
of
 sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
 through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When I
 try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!

 We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
 company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
 market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.

 I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug
6th
 to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
 impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
 promising me is on its way out)

 Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John McDowell
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
 you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   
 What about APs?

 John McDowell wrote:

 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of
72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
 
 that
   
 it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 
 3.65.
   
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on
a
 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
 performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 


 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/


 


 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread 3-dB Networks
The packetmax 100... it looks very similar... the PoE's are identical (not
sure if the power output is the same but they look exactly the same)

The case instead of being flat on the panel does have something of a raise,
but if you have seen a Tranzeo before, the first thing you are going to
think of when you see one of these is Tranzeo.

Apparently though there has been enough negative feedback on that that they
are going to change it hopefully to more of a Canopy Integrated 900 form
factor

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Which picture matches?

http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html

-Hal

-Original Message-
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0600

Tranzeo and Aperto are not collaborating at all (actually Tranzeo wanted to
rebrand the product their own).

What is going on is they are using the same manufacturer.  The PS and Case
are the same, beyond that everything on the inside is Aperto.

Trust me, I was very concerned about this when I was meeting with them.

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:59 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?

http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82 

I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?


Randy


3-dB Networks wrote:
 I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
 Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork
to
 become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list
are).

 I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too me...
 basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the
company
 thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as
extensive
 as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
 i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line
of
 sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
 through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When I
 try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!

 We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
 company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
 market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.

 I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug
6th
 to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
 impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
 promising me is on its way out)

 Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John McDowell
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
 you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   
 What about APs?

 John McDowell wrote:

 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of
72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
 
 that
   
 it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 
 3.65.
   
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on
a
 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread John McDowell
The 300 looks like the Redline cpe

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Which picture matches?

 http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html

 -Hal

 -Original Message-
 From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
  Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0600

 Tranzeo and Aperto are not collaborating at all (actually Tranzeo wanted to
 rebrand the product their own).

 What is going on is they are using the same manufacturer.  The PS and Case
 are the same, beyond that everything on the inside is Aperto.

 Trust me, I was very concerned about this when I was meeting with them.

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Randy Cosby
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:59 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?

 http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82

 I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?


 Randy


 3-dB Networks wrote:
  I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
  Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork
 to
  become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list
 are).
 
  I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too
 me...
  basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the
 company
  thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as
 extensive
  as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
  i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line
 of
  sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
  through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When
 I
  try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!
 
  We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
  company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
  market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.
 
  I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug
 6th
  to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
  impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
  promising me is on its way out)
 
  Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of John McDowell
  Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
  you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
  On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
 
  What about APs?
 
  John McDowell wrote:
 
  I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of
 72.
  Sub $400.
 
  Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
 
  that
 
  it is available. Have they come down at all?
 
  On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wrote:
 
 
 
  So, how much does this stuff cost?
 
  Brian
 
 
  John McDowell wrote:
 
  I believe it.
 
  Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 
  3.65.
 
  Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on
 a
  1-story house.
 
  On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wrote:
 
 
 
  Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
  the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
  products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
  the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
  Message-Id: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Mike
 
 
  At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
 
 
  Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
  poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
  evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
  performance described.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
 
 
  Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
  traditional, D, and E products.
 
 
  --
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
 
   Mike Cowan
  Wireless Connections
  A Division of ACC
  166 Milan Ave
  Norwalk, OH  44857
  419-660-6100
  419-706-7348
 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Harold Bledsoe
They are made by the same company along with a Moto wimax cpe and a few
others...

-Hal

-Original Message-
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:54:18 -0500

The 300 looks like the Redline cpe

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Which picture matches?

 http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html

 -Hal

 -Original Message-
 From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
  Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0600

 Tranzeo and Aperto are not collaborating at all (actually Tranzeo wanted to
 rebrand the product their own).

 What is going on is they are using the same manufacturer.  The PS and Case
 are the same, beyond that everything on the inside is Aperto.

 Trust me, I was very concerned about this when I was meeting with them.

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Randy Cosby
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:59 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?

 http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82

 I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?


 Randy


 3-dB Networks wrote:
  I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
  Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork
 to
  become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list
 are).
 
  I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too
 me...
  basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the
 company
  thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as
 extensive
  as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
  i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line
 of
  sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
  through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When
 I
  try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!
 
  We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
  company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
  market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.
 
  I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug
 6th
  to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
  impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
  promising me is on its way out)
 
  Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of John McDowell
  Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
  you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
  On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
 
  What about APs?
 
  John McDowell wrote:
 
  I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of
 72.
  Sub $400.
 
  Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
 
  that
 
  it is available. Have they come down at all?
 
  On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wrote:
 
 
 
  So, how much does this stuff cost?
 
  Brian
 
 
  John McDowell wrote:
 
  I believe it.
 
  Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 
  3.65.
 
  Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on
 a
  1-story house.
 
  On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wrote:
 
 
 
  Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
  the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
  products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
  the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
  Message-Id: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Mike
 
 
  At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
 
 
  Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
  poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
  evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
  performance described.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
 
 
  Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
  traditional, D, and E products

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Jeff Booher
10k is NOT the price for an 802.16e solution-

Try closer to 20-40k per sector

 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 5:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the poster
mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for evaluating
wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the performance
described.

Regards
Michael Baird

 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering 
 traditional, D, and E products.
 
 
 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
  With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw 
  my hat into the ring.
 
  3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent 
  connectivity, at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed gear.  
  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most of are 
  used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to cleaner 
  spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner than 
  our wild wild west unlicensed world.
 
  Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage 
  difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now 
  3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS 
  coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests 
  are showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here 
  are a couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:
 
  Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB 
  download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test
  5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted 
  on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not 
  pass data and could just barely maintain association.
 
  Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the 
  ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40'
  above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on 
  the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.
 
  Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB 
  down 3MB up.
 
  Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900 operator.  
  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100% coverage 
  at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations with  900 here 
  to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing because it 
  works everywhere.  They the said lets try to break it.  We drove 
  to a part of town that is challenged with 900 coverage.  They found 
  a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up to a big tree, took 
  the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the tree.  -101 signal.  
  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called the NOC and did a 
  can you hear me now?  Toll quality voice call.
 
  Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order 
  diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do 
  the upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That 
  coverage is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed 
  with a PC card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial 
  building, no signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  
  In this case the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC 
  diversity gains completely made up for the attenuation once the paths
became uncorrelated.
 
  Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more 
  expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price 
  breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to 
  work to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E 
  systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near 
  future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you 
  will walk away amazed.
 
  My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.
 
  Mike
 
 
 
 
 
  Mike Cowan
  Wireless Connections
  A Division of ACC
  166 Milan Ave
  Norwalk, OH  44857
  419-660-6100
  419-706-7348 Cell
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.wirelessconnections.net

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Jeff Booher
Brian,
 
 
Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's are
able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders or
larger deployments are taken into consideration. 
 
 
Best Regards,
 
 
Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.
 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


So, how much does this stuff cost?

Brian

John McDowell wrote: 

I believe it.



Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.

Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a

1-story house.



On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

wrote:



  

Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am

the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend

products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now

the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.

Message-Id:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mike





At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:



Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the

poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for

evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the

performance described.



Regards

Michael Baird



  

Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering

traditional, D, and E products.





--

Mike Hammett

Intelligent Computing Solutions

http://www.ics-il.com





 Mike Cowan

Wireless Connections

A Division of ACC

166 Milan Ave

Norwalk, OH  44857

419-660-6100

419-706-7348 Cell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.wirelessconnections.net












WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/








WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Jeff Booher
Eric,

How can it be possibly legal to use a 36dbm sector in 3.65ghz, unless you
are talking about using a 3dbi antenna at the base?

 


Jeff Booher
 
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:06 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Redmax 100U - Lower power (23dbm) basesation $10k with sector antenna.

Redmax 100UX - Certified last week, higher powered (36dbm) basestation $14k
with sector antenna.

-Eric

John McDowell wrote:
 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear 
 now that it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   
 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
3.65.
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db 
 on a 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am 
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend 
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now 
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the 
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable 
 for evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with 
 the performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering 
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 -
 --- WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireles
 s

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 -
 ---
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 



   





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Eric Muehleisen
You are correct. Don't shoot the messenger.

-Eric

Jeff Booher wrote:
 Eric,

 How can it be possibly legal to use a 36dbm sector in 3.65ghz, unless you
 are talking about using a 3dbi antenna at the base?

  


 Jeff Booher
  
 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950
  
 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
 copies.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Redmax 100U - Lower power (23dbm) basesation $10k with sector antenna.

 Redmax 100UX - Certified last week, higher powered (36dbm) basestation $14k
 with sector antenna.

 -Eric

 John McDowell wrote:
   
 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear 
 now that it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   
 
 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
   
 3.65.
   
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db 
 on a 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am 
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend 
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now 
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the 
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable 
 for evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with 
 the performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering 
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 -
 --- WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireles
 s

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 -
 ---
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
   

   
 



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread John Valenti
Mike,

This does seem to good to be true. Could you provide more details on  
these links (for instance, tower heights, or maybe even coordinates  
that I can look over the path)?

I was at a roadshow earlier this year. A Redline rep was there, he  
said that 3650 wasn't all that great thru trees. Maybe a kilometer.   
And Ball State U did a research study using 3.5GHz, they had spotty  
results starting at 3/4s of a of mile.

You say these tests were in Ohio, that would seem to be pretty close  
to Michigan in tree foliage and perhaps topography.

These are the sorts of results I've dreamed about, but can't really  
believe are possible. I was pinning my hopes on whitespaces radios.   
If you arrange a demo, I would love to drive down and look things over.

Also, you mention a PC card ... is someone making a wimax card in 3.65?
-John



On July 21, at 7:06 PM July 21, Mike Cowan wrote:

 With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw
 my hat into the ring.

 3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity,
 at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed
 gear.  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most
 of are used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to
 cleaner spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner
 than our wild wild west unlicensed world.

 Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage
 difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now
 3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS
 coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests are
 showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here are a
 couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:

 Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB
 download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test
 5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted
 on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not
 pass data and could just barely maintain association.

 Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the
 ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40'
 above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on
 the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.

 Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB  
 down 3MB up.

 Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900
 operator.  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100%
 coverage at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations
 with  900 here to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing
 because it works everywhere.  They the said lets try to break
 it.  We drove to a part of town that is challenged with 900
 coverage.  They found a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up
 to a big tree, took the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the
 tree.  -101 signal.  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called
 the NOC and did a can you hear me now?  Toll quality voice call.

 Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order
 diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do the
 upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That coverage
 is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed with a PC
 card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial building, no
 signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  In this case
 the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC diversity gains
 completely made up for the attenuation once the paths became  
 uncorrelated.

 Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more
 expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price
 breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to work
 to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E
 systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near
 future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you
 will walk away amazed.

 My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.

 Mike





 Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 Cell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.wirelessconnections.net


 -- 
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 -- 
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Brian Rohrbacher






John Valenti wrote:

  Mike,

This does seem to good to be true. Could you provide more details on  
these links (for instance, tower heights, or maybe even coordinates  
that I can look over the path)?

I was at a roadshow earlier this year. A Redline rep was there, he  
said that 3650 wasn't all that great thru trees. Maybe a kilometer.   
And Ball State U did a research study using 3.5GHz, they had spotty  
results starting at 3/4s of a of mile.

You say these tests were in Ohio, that would seem to be pretty close  
to Michigan in tree foliage and perhaps topography.
  

I drove down to Eldora Speedway (from Michigan) over a month ago and
was pretty amazed and how far I could see.
It was my first time down there and it was treeless and flat compared
to Michigan. The people riding with me
didn't have a clue what I was talking about but I kept telling them how
I wish I was a WISP down there. :)

  
These are the sorts of results I've dreamed about, but can't really  
believe are possible. I was pinning my hopes on whitespaces radios.   
If you arrange a demo, I would love to drive down and look things over.

Also, you mention a PC card ... is someone making a wimax card in 3.65?
-John



On July 21, at 7:06 PM July 21, Mike Cowan wrote:

  
  
With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw
my hat into the ring.

3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity,
at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed
gear.  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most
of are used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to
cleaner spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner
than our wild wild west unlicensed world.

Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage
difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now
3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS
coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests are
showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here are a
couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:

Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB
download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test
5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted
on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not
pass data and could just barely maintain association.

Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the
ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40'
above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on
the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.

Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB  
down 3MB up.

Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900
operator.  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100%
coverage at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations
with  900 here to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing
because "it works everywhere".  They the said "lets try to break
it".  We drove to a part of town that is challenged with 900
coverage.  They found a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up
to a big tree, took the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the
tree.  -101 signal.  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called
the NOC and did a "can you hear me now"?  Toll quality voice call.

Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order
diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do the
upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That coverage
is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed with a PC
card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial building, no
signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  In this case
the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC diversity gains
completely made up for the attenuation once the paths became  
uncorrelated.

Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more
expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price
breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to work
to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E
systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near
future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you
will walk away amazed.

My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.

Mike





Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wirelessconnections.net


-- 
--
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-- 
--

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Mike Hammett
Which is not your average WISP...


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
 assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's 
 are
 able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders 
 or
 larger deployments are taken into consideration.


 Best Regards,


 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or 
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance 
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. 
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete 
 all
 copies.


  _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian

 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.



 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 
 3.65.

 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a

 1-story house.



 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:





 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am

 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend

 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now

 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.

 Message-Id:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Mike





 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:



 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the

 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for

 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the

 performance described.



 Regards

 Michael Baird





 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering

 traditional, D, and E products.





 --

 Mike Hammett

 Intelligent Computing Solutions

 http://www.ics-il.com





 Mike Cowan

 Wireless Connections

 A Division of ACC

 166 Milan Ave

 Norwalk, OH  44857

 419-660-6100

 419-706-7348 Cell

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 www.wirelessconnections.net









 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/



 
 



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/















 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread Mike Hammett
That's probably EIRP, not radio power.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Eric Muehleisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 You are correct. Don't shoot the messenger.

 -Eric

 Jeff Booher wrote:
 Eric,

 How can it be possibly legal to use a 36dbm sector in 3.65ghz, unless you
 are talking about using a 3dbi antenna at the base?




 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or 
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance 
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. 
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete 
 all
 copies.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Redmax 100U - Lower power (23dbm) basesation $10k with sector antenna.

 Redmax 100UX - Certified last week, higher powered (36dbm) basestation 
 $14k
 with sector antenna.

 -Eric

 John McDowell wrote:

 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 
 72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear
 now that it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax

 3.65.

 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db
 on a 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable
 for evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with
 the performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 -
 --- WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireles
 s

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 -
 ---
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/









 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread 3-dB Networks
Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the average
WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP market doesn't
need, but really drives up the price (I think its supposed to do 6 9's for
availability?)

It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Which is not your average WISP...


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
 assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's 
 are
 able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders 
 or
 larger deployments are taken into consideration.


 Best Regards,


 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or 
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance 
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. 
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete 
 all
 copies.


  _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian

 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.



 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 
 3.65.

 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a

 1-story house.



 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:





 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am

 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend

 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now

 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.

 Message-Id:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Mike





 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:



 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the

 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for

 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the

 performance described.



 Regards

 Michael Baird





 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering

 traditional, D, and E products.





 --

 Mike Hammett

 Intelligent Computing Solutions

 http://www.ics-il.com





 Mike Cowan

 Wireless Connections

 A Division of ACC

 166 Milan Ave

 Norwalk, OH  44857

 419-660-6100

 419-706-7348 Cell

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 www.wirelessconnections.net











 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/





 



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org



 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


















 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread John Rock
A 4-5 dBi antenna gets you to 10 watts which would be legal in theory with a 
10 MHz wide channel ;-)
Wind load would be very small for that sized sector --- heeehhe


John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential 
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying 
or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by 
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message - 
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Eric,

 How can it be possibly legal to use a 36dbm sector in 3.65ghz, unless you
 are talking about using a 3dbi antenna at the base?




 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or 
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance 
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited. 
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete 
 all
 copies.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Redmax 100U - Lower power (23dbm) basesation $10k with sector antenna.

 Redmax 100UX - Certified last week, higher powered (36dbm) basestation 
 $14k
 with sector antenna.

 -Eric

 John McDowell wrote:
 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 
 72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear
 now that it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:


 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 3.65.
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db
 on a 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable
 for evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with
 the performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 -
 --- WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireles
 s

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 -
 ---
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/









 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread John Rock
I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their 
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do 
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with 
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and 
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by 
availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65 
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows 
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place 
for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with 
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each 
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this 
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the 
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between 
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing. 
The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential 
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying 
or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by 
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message - 
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the average
 WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP market doesn't
 need, but really drives up the price (I think its supposed to do 6 9's for
 availability?)

 It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Which is not your average WISP...


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
 assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's
 are
 able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders
 or
 larger deployments are taken into consideration.


 Best Regards,


 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited.
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete
 all
 copies.


  _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian

 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.



 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 3.65.

 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on 
 a

 1-story house.



 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:





 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am

 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend

 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now

 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.

 Message-Id:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Mike





 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:



 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the

 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread 3-dB Networks
I agree 100%... every WISP should really look at 3.65.  The problem is the
base station cost... I don't know many small WISP's that will be able to
afford a 10k base station.  Many have a hard time deploying say Canopy AP's
that cost $1200 or so.

My point is, unlike Canopy, Tranzeo, Ubquity, Trango, etc. etc. the
equipment is not being built for the WISP.  WISP's should be on board with
it, but don't confuse that with the equipment being built and marketed for
the average WISP (at least as what I think the average WISP is).

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Rock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their 
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do 
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with 
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and 
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by

availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65 
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows 
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place

for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with 
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each 
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this 
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the 
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between 
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing.

The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential 
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying

or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by 
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message - 
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the average
 WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP market doesn't
 need, but really drives up the price (I think its supposed to do 6 9's for
 availability?)

 It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Which is not your average WISP...


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
 assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's
 are
 able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders
 or
 larger deployments are taken into consideration.


 Best Regards,


 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited.
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete
 all
 copies.


  _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian

 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.



 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread 3-dB Networks
John,

From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same GPS
sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can be
timed together.  Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment to be
certified. 

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Rock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their 
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do 
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with 
each other all over the USA.
CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and 
yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated by

availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65 
networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows 
everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in place

for this to happen.

Hurdles...
-CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
-Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with 
competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
-Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each 
other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this 
does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the 
3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between 
base stations along with the interoperability standards they are developing.

The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

Thanks,

John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax  419-668-4077
http://www.wirelessconnections.net
This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential 
and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying

or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by 
reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
- Original Message - 
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the average
 WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP market doesn't
 need, but really drives up the price (I think its supposed to do 6 9's for
 availability?)

 It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 Which is not your average WISP...


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 Brian,


 Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
 assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's
 are
 able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders
 or
 larger deployments are taken into consideration.


 Best Regards,


 Jeff Booher

 Channel Manager, North America
 www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24/7: 206-455-4950

 This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
 work
 product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance
 or
 distribution by others without express permission is strictly prohibited.
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete
 all
 copies.


  _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian

 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.



 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
 3.65.

 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on 
 a

 1-story house.



 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:





 Many of you have known me for years, some

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-22 Thread John McDowell
I agree with you. Being a small WISP, we really took a risk investing in
RedMax gear for the simple fact that we are so rural. Selling Business
Internet and Voip bundles with a small PBX phone system is the only way
we're really going to see a decent return on this system in the near
future.
The equipment is incredible. I can't complain at all about the equipment or
the support, and it is definitely Carrier Grade. I just hope at some point
the equipment costs go down for us all to enjoy the benefits of WiMax.

Having said that, I hope the equipment stays just expensive enough to keep
the spectrum clean, if you know what I mean.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:49 PM, 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I agree 100%... every WISP should really look at 3.65.  The problem is the
 base station cost... I don't know many small WISP's that will be able to
 afford a 10k base station.  Many have a hard time deploying say Canopy AP's
 that cost $1200 or so.

 My point is, unlike Canopy, Tranzeo, Ubquity, Trango, etc. etc. the
 equipment is not being built for the WISP.  WISP's should be on board with
 it, but don't confuse that with the equipment being built and marketed for
 the average WISP (at least as what I think the average WISP is).

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John Rock
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:37 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

 I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their
 networks over the next 1-3 years.
 Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do
 the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with
 each other all over the USA.
 CPE will be available in all sorts of devices between 2.3 and 3.8 GHz and
 yes 3.65 falls in that window. Device frequency scanning will be dictated
 by

 availabilty. So if the WISP Market, small and large, build compatable 3.65
 networks with viable roaming agreements with the right service flows
 everyone could be happy. Keep in mind the right things need to fall in
 place

 for this to happen.

 Hurdles...
 -CPE that really are interoperable and in many types of devices.
 -Base Station RF in a cellular sence. That equals build outs with
 competitive priced Base stations in mobile mind set.
 -Base stations from different manufactureers that can GPS sync with each
 other so UL/DL ratios can co exist in a given area. To my knowledge this
 does not exist yet but would be critical to help with interference in the
 3.65 GHz band. The WiMAX forum needs to make sure this does exist between
 base stations along with the interoperability standards they are
 developing.

 The GPS peice may exist but I have yet to see in in the standerds.

 Thanks,

 John Rock
 Wireless Connections
 Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
 ACCessing the Future Today!!
 ofc. 419.660.6100
 cell 419-706-7356
 fax  419-668-4077
 http://www.wirelessconnections.net
 This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
 and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
 you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure,
 copying

 or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
 you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
 reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
 - Original Message -
 From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


  Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the average
  WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP market doesn't
  need, but really drives up the price (I think its supposed to do 6 9's
 for
  availability?)
 
  It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small customers bases
 
  Daniel White
  3-dB Networks
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Mike Hammett
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:36 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
  Which is not your average WISP...
 
 
  --
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
  Brian,
 
 
  Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
  assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's
  are
  able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders
  or
  larger deployments are taken into consideration.
 
 
  Best Regards

[WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Mike Cowan
With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw 
my hat into the ring.

3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity, 
at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed 
gear.  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most 
of are used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to 
cleaner spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner 
than our wild wild west unlicensed world.

Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage 
difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now 
3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS 
coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests are 
showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here are a 
couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:

Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB 
download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test 
5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted 
on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not 
pass data and could just barely maintain association.

Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the 
ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40' 
above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on 
the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.

Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB down 3MB up.

Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900 
operator.  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100% 
coverage at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations 
with  900 here to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing 
because it works everywhere.  They the said lets try to break 
it.  We drove to a part of town that is challenged with 900 
coverage.  They found a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up 
to a big tree, took the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the 
tree.  -101 signal.  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called 
the NOC and did a can you hear me now?  Toll quality voice call.

Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order 
diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do the 
upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That coverage 
is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed with a PC 
card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial building, no 
signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  In this case 
the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC diversity gains 
completely made up for the attenuation once the paths became uncorrelated.

Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more 
expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price 
breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to work 
to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E 
systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near 
future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you 
will walk away amazed.

My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.

Mike





Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wirelessconnections.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Scottie Arnett
Mike you have peaked my interest with the 900Mhz against the 3.65. Were any of 
these tests done with hills? My problem is we have hills, and lots of them and 
trees too. You can't drive much more than a mile without going up a hill with a 
change of 100 - 150 ft in elevation. Anyone tested or used 3.65 under these 
circumstances that care to chime in?

Scottie

-- Original Message --
From: Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:06:59 -0400

With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw 
my hat into the ring.

3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity, 
at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed 
gear.  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most 
of are used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to 
cleaner spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner 
than our wild wild west unlicensed world.

Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage 
difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now 
3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS 
coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests are 
showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here are a 
couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:

Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB 
download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test 
5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted 
on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not 
pass data and could just barely maintain association.

Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the 
ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40' 
above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on 
the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.

Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB down 3MB up.

Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900 
operator.  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100% 
coverage at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations 
with  900 here to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing 
because it works everywhere.  They the said lets try to break 
it.  We drove to a part of town that is challenged with 900 
coverage.  They found a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up 
to a big tree, took the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the 
tree.  -101 signal.  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called 
the NOC and did a can you hear me now?  Toll quality voice call.

Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order 
diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do the 
upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That coverage 
is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed with a PC 
card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial building, no 
signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  In this case 
the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC diversity gains 
completely made up for the attenuation once the paths became uncorrelated.

Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more 
expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price 
breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to work 
to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E 
systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near 
future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you 
will walk away amazed.

My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.

Mike





Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wirelessconnections.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



Dial-Up Internet service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $9.99/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com for information.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Mike Cowan
Hi Scottie,

No, all flat ground but Midwest trees.  Your scenario would be an 
interesting test.

Mike

At 07:59 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
Mike you have peaked my interest with the 900Mhz against the 3.65. 
Were any of these tests done with hills? My problem is we have 
hills, and lots of them and trees too. You can't drive much more 
than a mile without going up a hill with a change of 100 - 150 ft in 
elevation. Anyone tested or used 3.65 under these circumstances that 
care to chime in?

Scottie

Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wirelessconnections.net




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Mike Hammett
Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering 
traditional, D, and E products.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field


 With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw
 my hat into the ring.

 3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity,
 at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed
 gear.  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most
 of are used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to
 cleaner spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner
 than our wild wild west unlicensed world.

 Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage
 difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now
 3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS
 coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests are
 showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here are a
 couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:

 Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB
 download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test
 5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted
 on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not
 pass data and could just barely maintain association.

 Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the
 ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40'
 above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on
 the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.

 Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB down 3MB 
 up.

 Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900
 operator.  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100%
 coverage at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations
 with  900 here to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing
 because it works everywhere.  They the said lets try to break
 it.  We drove to a part of town that is challenged with 900
 coverage.  They found a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up
 to a big tree, took the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the
 tree.  -101 signal.  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called
 the NOC and did a can you hear me now?  Toll quality voice call.

 Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order
 diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do the
 upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That coverage
 is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed with a PC
 card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial building, no
 signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  In this case
 the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC diversity gains
 completely made up for the attenuation once the paths became uncorrelated.

 Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more
 expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price
 breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to work
 to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E
 systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near
 future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you
 will walk away amazed.

 My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.

 Mike





 Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 Cell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.wirelessconnections.net


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Michael Baird
Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
performance described.

Regards
Michael Baird

 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering 
 traditional, D, and E products.
 
 
 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 6:06 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
 
 
  With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw
  my hat into the ring.
 
  3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity,
  at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed
  gear.  Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most
  of are used to.  Pay a little extra for product, gain access to
  cleaner spectrum and hopefully a rule set that helps keep it cleaner
  than our wild wild west unlicensed world.
 
  Now deploy 3.650 using 802.16e upgradeable products.  The coverage
  difference when using diversity options goes up significantly.  Now
  3.650 begins to act and feel more like a 900Mhz product with NLOS
  coverage capability.  Actually our customers, and our field tests are
  showing that it exceeds 900Mhz often by a large margin.  Here are a
  couple recent field examples all 2nd order diversity:
 
  Customer 1- 8.4 mile NLOS location. blocked by heavy trees .  1.5MB
  download holding CPE in their hand on the ground!  Decided to test
  5.8 at this location and @ 50' AGL the CPE got a link.  5.8 mounted
  on the same tower, same height as 3.650.  The 5.8 system could not
  pass data and could just barely maintain association.
 
  Customer 2- 12.4 miles away at the owners home.  1.0mb on the
  ground.  This location could not be serviced by 2.4 or 5.8 at 40'
  above the ground previously.  The owner is going to mount Wimax on
  the roof and I expect he will se 10-12MB at that height.
 
  Customer 2- 12.6 miles on the ground.  Completely obstructed 6MB down 3MB 
  up.
 
  Customer 3- This is one of the most telling.  Canopy 900
  operator.  3.650 2nd order diversity mounted 10' below Canopy.  100%
  coverage at 3.650 of a small city.  It takes 2 tower locations
  with  900 here to serve the same area.  They gave up field testing
  because it works everywhere.  They the said lets try to break
  it.  We drove to a part of town that is challenged with 900
  coverage.  They found a traditionally bad coverage spot and drove up
  to a big tree, took the CPE out of the vehicle and buried it in the
  tree.  -101 signal.  They then picked up their VOIP phone and called
  the NOC and did a can you hear me now?  Toll quality voice call.
 
  Our internal testing is showing similar results. Using 4th order
  diversity is showing even better results than above.  When you do the
  upgrade to 16e and add Wave II CPE, Katy bar the door.  That coverage
  is nothing less than jaw dropping.  2.5 miles obstructed with a PC
  card!  Same PC card 1 mile away entering a commercial building, no
  signal change.  Not possible with a traditional system.  In this case
  the wall measured a 25db loss, however STC and MRC diversity gains
  completely made up for the attenuation once the paths became uncorrelated.
 
  Bottom line is diversity is the place to be with Wimax.  It is more
  expensive, so find a way to afford it.  Push your vendor for price
  breaks and don't be bashful.  Alvarion for example is willing to work
  to earn business as well as the others.  CPE costs for D and E
  systems are the same today, E will be much cheaper in the near
  future.  Not all Wimax is the same, so test a site or visit one, you
  will walk away amazed.
 
  My two cents, and we carry all D and E products.  Each has its place.
 
  Mike
 
 
 
 
 
  Mike Cowan
  Wireless Connections
  A Division of ACC
  166 Milan Ave
  Norwalk, OH  44857
  419-660-6100
  419-706-7348 Cell
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.wirelessconnections.net
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Mike Cowan
Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am 
the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend 
products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now 
the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mike


At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
performance described.

Regards
Michael Baird

  Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
  traditional, D, and E products.
 
 
  --
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 

Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wirelessconnections.net




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread John McDowell
I believe it.

Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.
Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
1-story house.

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
 performance described.
 
 Regards
 Michael Baird
 
   Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
   traditional, D, and E products.
  
  
   --
   Mike Hammett
   Intelligent Computing Solutions
   http://www.ics-il.com
  

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 Cell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.wirelessconnections.net




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com






This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy, re-transmit, or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in
error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
delete the message. E-mail communication is highly susceptible to spoofing,
spamming, and other tampering, some of which may be harmful to your
computer. If you are concerned about the authenticity of the message or the
source, please contact the sender directly.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Brian Rohrbacher




So, how much does this stuff cost?

Brian

John McDowell wrote:

  I believe it.

Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.
Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
1-story house.

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  
  
Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mike


At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


  Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
performance described.

Regards
Michael Baird

  
  
Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
traditional, D, and E products.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


  

 Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wirelessconnections.net





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  


  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread John McDowell
I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
Sub $400.

Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now that
it is available. Have they come down at all?

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
 performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com






This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy, re-transmit, or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in
error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
delete the message. E-mail communication is highly susceptible to spoofing,
spamming, and other tampering, some of which may be harmful to your
computer. If you are concerned about the authenticity of the message or the
source, please contact the sender directly.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread Brian Rohrbacher




What about APs?

John McDowell wrote:

  I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
Sub $400.

Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now that
it is available. Have they come down at all?

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  
  
So, how much does this stuff cost?

Brian


John McDowell wrote:

I believe it.

Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.
Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
1-story house.

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:



Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mike


At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
performance described.

Regards
Michael Baird



Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
traditional, D, and E products.


--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

 Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH  44857
419-660-6100
419-706-7348 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  


  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

2008-07-21 Thread 3-dB Networks
I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
Aperto gear.  We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork to
become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list are).

I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too me...
basically the too good to be true type thing.  Everyone else in the company
thought really the same thing.  Field testing, while not nearly as extensive
as others have done on this list (we are limited by the tower location
i.e. the roof of the building, we had to play with) but 5 miles near line of
sight at full modulation was no problem.  We were even getting 6Mb or so
through our metal roof, with the sector pointing 180 degrees away.  When I
try that with a 5.2GHz Canopy SM we are lucky if it connects!

We were sold on Aperto by CPE cost, the EMS management system, and the
company background (Aperto is one of the big players on the international
market).  I'd be happy to shoot a quote to anyone that is interested.

I'll be attending the technical training along with Dave Kennedy on Aug 6th
to really grasp what this equipment can do.  So far I have been really
impressed (but the Tranzeo looking CPE case has to go, which they are
promising me is on its way out)

Anyways my 2 cents... another critic convinced

Daniel White
3-dB Networks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John McDowell
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 8:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Depends, sub $10,000. Boun Senekham at CTI can help you with a quote if
you're interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 What about APs?

 John McDowell wrote:

 I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
 Sub $400.

 Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now
that
 it is available. Have they come down at all?

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 So, how much does this stuff cost?

 Brian


 John McDowell wrote:

 I believe it.

 Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax
3.65.
 Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
 1-story house.

 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-).  I am
 the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
 products to a client.  Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied.  Now
 the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mike


 At 08:52 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:


 Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
 poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
 evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
 performance described.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
 traditional, D, and E products.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com

  Mike Cowan
 Wireless Connections
 A Division of ACC
 166 Milan Ave
 Norwalk, OH  44857
 419-660-6100
 419-706-7348 [EMAIL PROTECTED]







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com






This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy