Birds of a feather reporting in Airwave?

[Chad Burnham]

HI fellow list members,

I was looking for other folks on this list that use Aruba's Airwave to generate 
meaningful reports to aid in monitoring and operating your wireless networks.

We have been trying to develop better and more meaningful reporting that shows 
a deeper understanding of the health of all of our wireless networks over time.

As we have invested significant resources in cabling, switches, controllers, 
Clearpass and Airwave servers and new/more next gen WAPs, we are trying to show 
the value more and more to senior management with our various tools.

We have got some reports working today (we are running 8.2.2.1); we are trying 
to find the "best of breed" reporting that you may rely in your environments 
and apply them here @ DU.

Knowing when we have problems before our users do is a goal. Increasing the 
customer perception of excellent wireless service is also a goal. Our audience 
types could be our own team or they may be senior management or even student 
government.

Yes, we are working with our local Aruba/HPE SE and the Aruba/HPE product 
manager of Airwave in this journey; they are an excellent resource and business 
partner.

Some of the area of theme/focus might include:

* Are the networks healthy?

* RF Performance

* RF Capacity

* RF Channel Utilization

* Bandwidth Usage

* Users, device types, etc.

Thanks in advance for anyone that can share what they might be proud of.

Happy Holidays,

Chad


[cid:image001.jpg@01D37A6A.605F80B0]
Director of Network Services
Information Technology
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
SIP URI = chad.burn...@du.edu
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657
https://du.webex.com/join/cburnham
https://udenver.zoom.us/my/cburnham





**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Airwave report for wifi calling?

[Chad Burnham]

HI,

Has anyone built a good report in Airwave to show wifi calling usage by carrier 
in their HPE/Aruba environments?

I am looking for a report on Wifi calling traffic by carrier (if even 
possible). I am looking for a report for the big four (Sprint, Verizon, 
T-Mobile and AT).

We are on airwave 8.2.2.1

Thanks in advance,

Chad

Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Per room wireless

[Chad Burnham]

HI Michael,

We completed Aruba AP-205H per room about a year ago, refreshed the edge 
switches with 10G uplinks too.  Major project for us.  Lots of box re-work in 
some of the rooms to facilitate the new WAPs. Feel we are set for the next 4-5 
years.

Chad

Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver 
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657
https://du.webex.com/join/cburnham
https://udenver.zoom.us/my/cburnham








-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Blaisdell
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 8:48 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Per room wireless

How many on the list have moved to a per room model for wireless for student 
residence halls?



Michael Blaisdell
Director of Network Services
IT Services
Learning Commons/Library
Saint Francis University
117 Evergreen Drive
Loretto, PA  15940
814-472-3242
http://www.francis.edu
The best way to predict the future is to invent it. Alan Kay

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: point to point wireless bridge

[Chad Burnham]

HI Bruce,

For the last link we moved to their newer Flex 4G-UHA model.  We had one (two) 
failures with that link, I am still awaiting root cause analysis from 
Bridgewave enginnering.  Tip; use their optics (finstar).

Chad


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 10:02 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] point to point wireless bridge

We have been running a pair of Bridgewave GE60 units for several years to link 
to some remote buildings.  We recently learned that these units are 
reaching/reached EOL, so it is time to begin looking at replacing this 
hardware.   I was looking to see what others have used for this type of link.  
The distance between the two units is about 200 feet and the bridge units are 
connecting to 1Gb ports on the switches at each end.

Thank you
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: University of Denver - Analyst II position

[Chad Burnham]

HI,

The correct URL for the University of Denver Job Opening is:

https://du-openhire.silkroad.com/epostings/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.jobinfo=1325=ONLINE=993360_id=16973=1no=

My apologies for the incorrect link sent earlier today.

Thanks,

Chad


From: Chad Burnham
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 9:34 AM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
(WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU) <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>; 
net...@listserv.educause.edu
Subject: University of Denver - Analyst II position

HI,

The University of Denver has posted a second Network Analyst II position 
(filled the first position earlier this year):

https://du-openhire.silkroad.com/epostings/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.jobinfo=1121=ONLINE=992440_id=16973=1no=

Again, If you are thinking of moving to Denver, now could be a good time for 
you or someone you know!

Thanks,

Chad


[cid:image001.jpg@01D15D06.6F36BBE0]
Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

University of Denver - Analyst II position

[Chad Burnham]

HI,

The University of Denver has posted a second Network Analyst II position 
(filled the first position earlier this year):

https://du-openhire.silkroad.com/epostings/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.jobinfo=1121=ONLINE=992440_id=16973=1no=

Again, If you are thinking of moving to Denver, now could be a good time for 
you or someone you know!

Thanks,

Chad


[cid:image001.jpg@01D15CD3.7D046570]
Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] eduroam in a Cisco environment

[Chad Burnham]

Hi Tim,
We are Aruba on the AP/controllers, and Cisco on the Core and firewalls.
Do you have eduroam deployed as your primary SSID or in addition to your SSID's?
Eduroam is our primary 802.1x secure SSID, however we now have an unsecured 
SSID for “general use” and “guests” for the masses.
Do you separate/tag your eduraom users?
Yes, the separate network using the “@ (realm)” to discern our users and our 
own Eduroam folks – this allows rules that defines role and ultimately acl 
rules. We also use Cisco SUP2Ts and VPLS-PE (MPLS) across two core routers to 
keep networks redundant across two core routers. This is a layer 2.5 approach 
if you will to deal with separate routed domains.
If so, how(acs/ISE/free radius, etc)?
Aruba ClearPass
How big are your wireless subnets?

2 x /16 – Aruba whitepaper recommends large networks now – in the old days they 
did not.

Chad

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Cisco AVC reporting in PI 2.2

[Chad Burnham]

Lee,

We have AVC working in PI 2.2.0  - our source is netflow from 2 x ASR-1006 edge 
Routers only. I spent a lot time trying to get it to work from SUP2T to no 
avail.
We are using Aruba controllers and airwave on our wireless side for this 
function.

Chad


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 2:03 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco AVC reporting in PI 2.2

As I just shared with our SE...

After going to PI 2.2, we lost the ability to see AVC information in PI. It was 
easy to setup in 1.4 after getting the assurance licenses we needed using this: 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/115756-avc-guide-00.html

And then there is this for PI 3 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-infrastructure/solution_overview_c22-728972.html#_Toc428598044

But I can find nothing on 2.2 and the PI interface maps to neither the old or 
new. Any idea where I can find guidance on application reporting setup in 2.2 
PI? I had no idea this was gone until I needed it, and I'm finding nothing 
after hours of searching.



Anyone else been down this road? I have it set fine on the WLCs, just PI is 
typically confounding.

(yes I know 3.0 is out)

Thanks-

Lee

Lee Badman | Network Architect
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e lhbad...@syr.edu w 
its.syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] PoE Issue, Cisco Switches- Let's Poll The Audience!

[Chad Burnham]

Hi Jeff,

Sounds like a “talk to the BU via your SE” answer if you really want it fixed…

Chad



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:03 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] PoE Issue, Cisco Switches- Let's Poll The Audience!

No bug ID, but it’s mentioned in the release notes for 15.2, but oddly, not in 
the open caveat section. That suggests it’s something that can’t be fixed.

Jeff

From: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu 
on behalf of trent.h...@louisville.edumailto:trent.h...@louisville.edu
Reply-To: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 5:26 AM
To: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] PoE Issue, Cisco Switches- Let's Poll The Audience!

You have a bug id for this?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Jeffrey D. Sessler 
j...@scrippscollege.edumailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu wrote:
Lee,

This could apply too. It’s a bug in the –X series.

When a powered device (such as an IP phone) connected to a PoE+ port restarts 
and sends a CDP or LLDP packet with a power TLV, the switch locks to the 
power-negotiation protocol of that first packet. The switch does not respond to 
power requests from the other protocol. For example, if the switch is locked to 
CDP, it does not provide power to devices that send LLDP requests. If CDP is 
disabled after the switch has locked on it, the switch does not respond to LLDP 
power requests and can no longer power on any accessories.

Jeff

From: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu 
on behalf of lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edu
Reply-To: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM
To: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] PoE Issue, Cisco Switches- Let's Poll The Audience!

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the information- generally, yes the problem device comes up an 
another port. Part of the madness is the infrequency and unpredictability of 
the condition, so hard to do any sort of real testing. But you’ve given us a 
good place to start with a version-quest☺

-Lee

Lee Badman | Network Architect
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.eduw 
its.syr.eduhttp://its.syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.eduhttp://syr.edu

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:42 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] PoE Issue, Cisco Switches- Let's Poll The Audience!

Lee,

There is/was a known PoE issue with the older 15.x releases where on boot 
connected devices will power up, but it there is any interruption on that port 
e.g. Device reboots or cable removed, the port will not power back up without a 
switch reboot. The problem manifests over time (if I recall). When it’s 
occurring, if you move the device from a “dead” port to another, does it power 
back up? When it’s at it worst, other ports won’t respond either.

It was fixed years ago in 15.2 train. Don’t think Cisco ever fixed it in 15.0. 
I’d get that switch updated to 15.2 and see if the problem goes away.

Jeff

From: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu 
on behalf of lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edu
Reply-To: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 8:47 AM
To: 
wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edumailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] PoE Issue, Cisco Switches- Let's Poll The Audience!

We’re also going through TAC on this, but I’d like to see if anyone else is 
seeing similar in their Cisco switching environment and might have perspective 
to share.

We have an odd, seemingly spontaneous condition where  PoE stops working on a 
port or two, with only switch reboot bringing it back. Most recent switch:  
WS-C3560X-48 on 15.0(2)SE7.

Problem/discovery flow:

? One AP out of several on switch goes down
? Access switch, “show power inline” shows problem AP port has lost 
it’s PoE  detection signature and is only showing IEEE PD
? All other AP ports are fine
? For problem port, remove PoE (Power Inline Never) then restore PoE 
(Power Inline Auto)- Port now dead, will not come back -also do shut/no 
shut,makes no difference to condition
? No error disable on port. No obvious reason for switch 

RE: netflix question

[Chad Burnham]

HI Dave,

Our GigaPoP (FRGP) Installed a netflix cache with success for all members - see 
usage graph below:
[http://www.frgp.net/cgi-bin/cricket/mini-graph.cgi?type=png;target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Fcore-l3%2Fxe-0-3-2;inst=0;dslist=ifHCInOctets%2CifHCOutOctets;range=41472000;rand=296]

When we moved from 1G to 10G in our WAN, we saw ~200 mbit increase overnight 
for us; all Netflix traffic.  Give the network/service more BW and it will 
result in higher quality content (combined with the user subscription level as 
mentioned). We do not throttle this traffic as at this point in time as we have 
plenty of headroom now with 10G. Prior to 1G in our WAN, you could say is was a 
problem since it was trying to starve the limited pipe.

Chad

Chad D Burnham
Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657
[UniversityTechnologyServices_Signature]





From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Alexander, David
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:46 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] netflix question

I wanted to know if Netflix has been a problem for other schools, specifically 
those with large residential campuses.

We've seen usage on our campus grow a lot over the past few years, and our 
response has been to implement a bandwidth cap on Netflix from 8 am to 10 pm.  
This pretty much makes Netflix unusable during the day.  When we lift the 
bandwidth cap at night, Netflix takes up around 40% of our total traffic.

I'm curious if other schools are dealing with Netflix bandwidth issues and what 
solutions you have implemented that allows students to enjoy Netflix without 
impacting the usability of the network.

Thanks,
Dave
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for interest among Wi-Fi professionals

[Chad Burnham]

HI Hunter,

Aruba people have issues too, and lot of us on this list….the pendulum swings 
between the vendors at various product release cycles, is what I find on the 
list.

Chad


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hunter Fuller
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2:20 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for interest among Wi-Fi professionals

I know I have just been assuming Aruba people have no issues, since I never see 
them on the list! ;)
It would be nice to have some sort of context/insight into the grand scheme of 
things, rather than just Ciscoland.


--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBRH M-9B
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure

I am part of the UAH Safe Zone LGBTQIA support network: 
http://www.uah.edu/student-affairs/safe-zone

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Chuck Enfield 
chu...@psu.edumailto:chu...@psu.edu wrote:
I asked exactly that question just a few weeks ago, but I didn’t use this list. 
 Between Airheads and more intimate peer groups, I don’t usually raise those 
questions here.  FWIW, I’ve also been asked this question off-list by people 
from other edu’s.

To be honest, I’m interested to hear whether or not people think this is the 
best venue for vendor-specific issues.  I sometimes feel like I spend too much 
time deleting Cisco posts on this list.  While I’ve never thought it was 
inappropriate to discuss those things here, it is why I tend to take Aruba 
issues to forums where I know the other participants use Aruba.  On the other 
hand, there are plenty of people from Aruba shops on this list that may not a 
have access to the forums I use and would benefit from seeing the discussion 
here.  So, should I be posting Aruba-specific questions and comments on this 
list, or should that stay on Airheads?

Chuck Enfield
Manager, Wireless Systems  Engineering
Telecommunications  Networking Services
The Pennsylvania State University
110H, USB2, UP, PA 16802
ph: 814.863.8715tel:814.863.8715
fx: 814.865.3988tel:814.865.3988

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services)
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 3:42 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for interest among Wi-Fi professionals

I could be useful IF it is not dominated with Cisco Wi-Fi issues. Although 
Cisco is the largest vendor, they must have the most issues.
When was the last time people were asking whether to upgrade to a GA version of 
ArubaOS?, for instance?


Bruce Osborne
Wireless Engineer
IT Infrastructure  Media Solutions

(434) 592-4229tel:%28434%29%20592-4229

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champions for Christ since 1971

From: Lee H Badman [mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 1:49 PM
Subject: Looking for interest among Wi-Fi professionals

This is not meant to self-promote, apologies if it seems that way. Looking for 
interest on whether those on the list would get value out of a potential new 
wireless-oriented discussion board, as described here:

https://wirednot.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/hey-wireless-professionals-would-you-use/

Won’t hurt my feelings either way, but could be kind of valuable if you picture 
it widely used.

Regards-

Lee Badman



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] latest from FCC on de-authing Mi-Fi

[Chad Burnham]

HI Bob,

Good piece,

I thought this was his best quote captured:

In the real world, Wi-Fi operates under the laws of physics and is neither 
limitless, nor perfect. Designing wireless systems, especially Wi-Fi, requires 
optimizing trade-offs in coverage, capacity, speed, security, complexity, 
reliability and affordability

I can't tell you how many meetings in I am in where I have to continuously 
explain this to people.

Thanks for shining a light on this topic with your story.

Chad


Chad D Burnham
Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657
[UniversityTechnologyServices_Signature]




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Bob Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:23 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] latest from FCC on de-authing Mi-Fi

Thought my recent interview with head of wireless for Partners Healthcare might 
be of interest re: the FCC de-authing discussion

http://www.networkworld.com/article/2881540/careers/how-not-to-get-slammed-by-the-fcc-for-wi-fi-blocking.html



Bob Brown

Online Executive Editor, News

T: 508.766.5418

LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/bobbrownboston | Twitter: 
@alphadoggshttps://twitter.com/alphadoggs | Facebook 
profilehttps://www.facebook.com/NetworkWorld | Google + 
profilehttps://plus.google.com/104712908618368674642/posts | 
Instagramhttp://instagram.com/nwwinstagram


NETWORK WORLD

492 Old Connecticut Path | PO Box 9002 | Framingham, MA 01701-9002

NetworkWorld.comhttp://www.networkworld.com | Media 
Kithttp://www.networkworldmediakit.com | Conferences  
Eventshttp://events.networkworld.com

An IDG Enterprisehttp://www.idgenterprise.com/ Brand



From: Mike Howard mi...@berkeley.edumailto:mi...@berkeley.edu
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] latest from FCC on de-authing Mi-Fi

The FCC specifically exempted university dormitories from the OTARD rules. I 
believe we can prohibit the installation of antennas in dorm rooms, but not 
family housing apartments.

https://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule
http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98273.pdf
https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EPO0414.pdf

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Frank Sweetser 
f...@wpi.edumailto:f...@wpi.edu wrote:
If we were to impose that on student residents, why couldn't Marriott do the 
same to hotel and conference guests?
On January 28, 2015 11:05:53 AM EST, Hunter Fuller 
hf0...@uah.edumailto:hf0...@uah.edu wrote:

You can't deauth the users, but you can make one of the requirements
for living in the dorms don't put up a hotspot. (I assume this is
where most of us see problems.)

--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBRH M-9B
+1 256 824 5331tel:%2B1%20256%20824%205331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure

I am part of the UAH Safe Zone LGBTQIA support network:
http://www.uah.edu/student-affairs/safe-zone


On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Chuck Anderson 
c...@wpi.edumailto:c...@wpi.edu wrote:

 What if our users see this news and start pushing back on bringing
 their own Wi-Fi to campus?  If we have to allow it, and the WLAN
 becomes unusable due to all the overlappi!

 ng

channel 2 and channel 5
 devices etc., what do we tell our users and the administration?
 Sorry, the FCC says we can't force these users to abstain from using
 their own Wi-Fi devices, even if they interfere.  That's the problem
 with FCC Part 15--must accept interference from other sources.  The
 best we can do is nicely ask them to change channels...

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco PI 2.2 upgrade

[Chad Burnham]

HI All,

PI 2.2 is a beta only program that you had to have your SE register you for to 
participate.  I had to fill in special paperwork to participate in it (NDA, 
etc.).  We did that, but are unfortunately currently out of resources (VM (UCS) 
CPU/disk/space and employee time) to commit at this moment.  Our plan is to 
wait for the release, and build a parallel system to go from 2.1 to 2.2, and 
rehost the licenses.  We are hoping for some enhanced AVC functions to use with 
our campus border routers (ASR-1006) in this new release.  This was the major 
driver to join the 2.2 beta program for us, as we are an Aruba wireless shop 
and use airwave on that side.

This e-mail below was sent to us on the list on 10/23 (I hope I do not get in 
hot-water for leaking this to this list!).  Please work with you SE on joining 
future beta programs. I know some of you do have the resources to stand-up, 
test and provide meaningful feedback that will help us all out as larger 
community.  If my SE had not mentioned it in passing, I would have never known…

All we can do is hope they improve the software for us.

Chad


Greetings,

We are now about to start week 5 of the Prime Infra 2.2 beta, only 3 weeks left 
(beta will end November 14). Please keep up your effort testing all the 
features of Prime Infra 2.2 that are important to you, and let us know if you 
are having any problems.

It would also be great if beta participants could take a minute to send us a 
general status report:

  *   What have you tested so far?
  *   What do you like?
  *   What do you not like or find annoying?
  *   Any wishes?
Also, please note that there is a beta patch available (on the same download 
page you have used to download the beta materials): look for the 2 files at the 
top dated October 23, there is a patch file and an accompanying READ ME with 
all the details about what fixes are included and how to install it. We would 
request that ALL beta customers install this patch (whether you think you need 
the fixes or not), as part of the testing is to further ensure that there are 
no undesirable side effects of the these fixes (we have tested them, but we 
always want this covered by beta testing as well).

Thanks

Prime Infrastructure Beta Team
-

RE: Cisco AVC- anyone using it for real in prod?

[Chad Burnham]

HI Lee,

Getting it humming this month – on a pair of ASR 1006 Routers (sorry not in 
Wireless).
We have Prime Infrastructure (2.1) managing it.

We removed our Anagrans this summer to move to this.

We just upgraded ASR this AM to support it. Will let you know in a month.
I am scheduled to talk/present @ WestNet about our experiences in January.

Signatures = Protocol Packs. You can update them without rebooting the router.

CB

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:28 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco AVC- anyone using it for real in prod?


​We are using Cisco's WLAN application visibility, but doing little with it 
beyond the occasional looking in.  Elsewhere, we use Palo Alto boxes to shape 
traffic, but are interested in getting the controllers more involved in a prod 
role.



Is anyone relying on AVC to drop traffic like P2P in prod? Is it working well 
for you? How often do you find signature updates available? Any other 
thoughts/comments on experiences, successes, or frustrations with using AVC for 
real- especially on large networks?



Thanks-



Lee Badman




Lee H. Badman
Network Architect/Wireless TME
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Cloud Path Enrollment System

[Chad Burnham]

HI Curtis,

We are looking at the product, but have not purchased nor stood up a test 
environment. We use their on ramping tool now.
FYI, We did sponsor Cloudpath for InCommon cooperate membership - about two 
months ago.

Chad

Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver 
2100 S. High St. #112
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657






-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 11:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cloud Path Enrollment System

Hello,

I am currently running a demo of the Cloud Path Enrollment System and I have to 
say that I am amazed at the capabilities they have packed into this tool.  I 
really like the workflow for onboarding almost anything/anyone, and I like the 
focus on moving to EAP-TLS which I think is inevitable if not urgent.  The 
integration with my existing RADIUS, and Controller environment is also nice, 
However, I am concerned about their support which seems a bit under-trained, 
and less than responsive so far.  (It could be that this is because I have not 
yet purchased the product ...so I am on the get to later list ...not sure).

Anyway, I am just wondering if there are any other ES customers out there 
willing to share their experience either on, or off-list.  What are the 
strengths, what are the weaknesses in your mind?  What problems have you 
solved, or encountered, and how has their support helped you through them?

Thanks,

Curtis Larsen
University of Utah 
Wireless Network Engineer


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Wifi Phone on Separate SSID`

[Chad Burnham]

HI Jeff,

We do the same currently @ DU. We are using a Pre-Shared Key (PSK) on that SSID 
today.

A question comes to mind, will you use a cached user/pw for the credentials on 
the device itself or use, say a 7 year device certificate instead (something we 
are pondering)?  We are having the same thoughts.  I'd add that when you 
use a dedicated SSID, you can gain some knobs on the controller's 
configuration that you can tweak for say a particular make/model that is 
problematic (EG: Cisco 7925G)

Thanks,

Chad


Chad D Burnham
Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657
[UniversityTechnologyServices_Signature]




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Legge, Jeffry
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 10:39 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wifi Phone on Separate SSID`

I currently have a separate SSID for wireless cisco phones. I am thinking about 
using my wpa2 secure SSID for them. Anybody got any caveats or suggestions?

Jeff Legge
Network Services
Radford University
(540)-831-7727

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: 802.11AC Future Infrastructure

[Chad Burnham]

HI Joe,

We are moving ahead with and future WAP installs using 2 x CAT6A per the 
upcoming/pending TIA TSB-162-A recommendations  approval:

See:
http://www.cablinginstall.com/articles/print/volume-21/issue-8/features/tia-revising-specification-for-cabling-wireless-access-points.html

Also see:
http://www.ieee802.org/3/bq/public/nov13/larsen_3bq_01_1113.pdf


Chad

Chad D Burnham
Director of Telecommunications
University Technology Services
University of Denver
2100 S. High St. #106
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657
[UniversityTechnologyServices_Signature]




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Stewart, Joe
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 10:40 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11AC Future Infrastructure

As this technology begins to be deployed is anyone out there planning ahead for 
wave two of this?  I know it's not going to happen for a while but I'm curious 
if there are folks in the process of new construction where you have the option 
to add the infrastructure now to support the 10Gbps.  If so, has there been any 
documentation on what cable type would be recommended for this? (ex. CAT6A or 
CAT7).

Thanks,


Joe Stewart
Network Specialist I
Information Systems and Network Services
Claremont McKenna College
325 E. 8th Street, Roberts South #12
Claremont, CA 91711

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: Cisco ACS condition- anyone else seen anything similar

[Chad Burnham]

HI Lee,

A few years back I used ACS - AD account for Ciscoworks LMS.  Ciscoworks does 
multi-threaded tasks under the hood.  This resulted in multiple/fast auths 
using the AD account.  The AD controller(s) saw this as an attack and thus 
caused the AD account to  be momentarily locked out.  After a few minutes, AD 
would allow the account to be used again.  I moved away from AD integration for 
this reason in this case. Once I moved to local CW account, AD was out of the 
mix and Ciscoworks performed normal.

Chad


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:12 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco ACS condition- anyone else seen anything similar

Today, after several days of no-problem ramping up to full strength on our 
large WLAN 7.4.110 environment, we had two fleeting spates of disruption in the 
authentication of clients against AD. Each episode lasted a few minutes, and 
resulted in our Cisco ACS 5.4s showing large volumes of these failure reasons:

11051 RADIUS packet contains invalid state attribute
24463 Internal error in the ACS Active directory

We have a TAC case open, and am waiting to hear back from our AD admin on 
whether there are any logs showing trouble between the accounts we use on the 
ACS boxes and the Domain Controllers.

Has anyone seen similar that can comment or theorize?

Regards-

Lee Badman



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Cisco ACS condition- anyone else seen anything similar

[Chad Burnham]

Lee,

If you pre pay for M$ technical services, get your MS-TAM engineer involved 
too/start MS TAC case.  AD logs are hard to read, don't tell you much and most 
AD admins never want to help out in this area I find.

;-)

CB

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:05 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco ACS condition- anyone else seen anything 
similar

Thanks, Chad- we have no choice but to use the ACS-AD account as the hook to 
verify user accounts. No sign of account lockout, but we're still digging:)

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Chad Burnham
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:01 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco ACS condition- anyone else seen anything 
similar

HI Lee,

A few years back I used ACS - AD account for Ciscoworks LMS.  Ciscoworks does 
multi-threaded tasks under the hood.  This resulted in multiple/fast auths 
using the AD account.  The AD controller(s) saw this as an attack and thus 
caused the AD account to  be momentarily locked out.  After a few minutes, AD 
would allow the account to be used again.  I moved away from AD integration for 
this reason in this case. Once I moved to local CW account, AD was out of the 
mix and Ciscoworks performed normal.

Chad


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:12 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco ACS condition- anyone else seen anything similar

Today, after several days of no-problem ramping up to full strength on our 
large WLAN 7.4.110 environment, we had two fleeting spates of disruption in the 
authentication of clients against AD. Each episode lasted a few minutes, and 
resulted in our Cisco ACS 5.4s showing large volumes of these failure reasons:

11051 RADIUS packet contains invalid state attribute
24463 Internal error in the ACS Active directory

We have a TAC case open, and am waiting to hear back from our AD admin on 
whether there are any logs showing trouble between the accounts we use on the 
ACS boxes and the Domain Controllers.

Has anyone seen similar that can comment or theorize?

Regards-

Lee Badman



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Filing a Complaint With Cisco?

[Chad Burnham]

Hi Lee,

I find the annual Walker Quality survey is a good method to get their 
attention.  You must be a current customer in some fashion/product line to be 
able to get the survey sent to you.

CB


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:46 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Filing a Complaint With Cisco?

Rather than just spraying vice presidents with email and similar low-brow 
methods, has anyone found a formal method of getting a complaint heard at the 
highest levels in Cisco, in particular for the wireless management space?

Thanks-

Lee


Lee H. Badman
Network Architect/Wireless TME
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

[Chad Burnham]

HI Josh,

This is an issue if you are using Aruba (or any others) also.  
We had to re-enable 1  2 mbit bit rates this week to deal with this. 
:-(
We had previously disabled those rates last year for performance reasons.

We feel this is the root cause of so many MAC disconnect/DHCP pool exhaustion 
problems this week for us.

Chad

Assistant Director of Telecommunication Planning  Implementation
University Technology Services
University of Denver 
2100 S. High St. #112
Denver, CO 80208
Desk Phone: 303-871-4441
Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657


-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Robertson, Joshua A.
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:29 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

If you're using Cisco one thing to check is that the MCS0 data rate is enabled. 
 I had a lot of problems with Macs and iThings dropping after I disabled the 
802.11b rates and MCS0.  Per TAC's suggestion I re-enabled the MCS0 rate and 
have not been experiencing the problems since.  Apparently it has to do with 
the OS dropping the data rate to MCS0 to save power, but not checking if that 
rate is supported before doing it. 

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Linchuan Yang
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 3:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

Dear All

Could you please provide the links on the forums of Apple website, and other 
official evidence that shows IPv6 is the main reason for this problem? Some 
clients of ours have the same issue, we are using Cisco wireless network.

Thank you.

Yours,
Linchuan Yang (Antony)
Wireless Networking Analyst
Network Assessment and Integration,
IITS-Concordia University
Tel: (514)848-2424 ext. 7664



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Russ Leathe
Sent: September-18-12 4:10 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

Yes, indeed.  We found that IPv6 was on by default.  The theory is, it would 
try to get  an IPv6  DHCP first, timeout, grab an IPv4, then retry IPv6. In 
doing so, disconnect.

From Terminal,

networksetup  -setv6off Wi-Fi

Disconnects are a major problem with OSX 10.5 and above...just read the forums 
on Apples site.




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Londono, Hernan
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

I would like to know if anyone is having an issue with a lot of disconnection 
for Mac computers with OS versions 10.5 and up. We are an Aruba deployment (M3 
controllers and AP-105s/125s). For the past 3 weeks we have seen a high amount 
of disconnections where about 90% have been tracked Apple notebooks with the 
latest OS versions. I'd be grateful to hear if anyone one is having, of has had 
the same issue recently, and any possible recommendations to address the issues.


HERNAN LONDONO
Associate CIO
Barry University


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 703364122) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703364122m=81e459a64729t=20120919c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703364122m=81e459a64729t=20120919c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703364122m=81e459a64729t=20120919c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Visitor access

[Chad Burnham]

HI Bruce,

 

We have deployed a homegrown solution @ DU:

 

https://taurus.cair.du.edu/uts/networks/networkGuestForm.html



http://www.du.edu/uts/networks/wireless.html

 

You must be sponsored by someone here @ DU - no self-service for guests
themselves.  This is an intentional policy decision.

 

We have looked at SafeConnect's offering/module (our NAC vendor) and Aruba's
AmigoPod products. 

For now we are sticking with our homegrown solution.

 

http://www.impulse.com/policy-modules.php#2



http://www.arubanetworks.com/products/management-security-software-2/amigopo
d-visitor-management-2/

 

Good luck!

 

 

 

Chad D Burnham

Telecommunications Network Planner

University Technology Services - Network Services

University of Denver 

2100 S. High St. #112

Denver, CO 80208

Desk Phone: 303-871-4441

Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657

 

 

 

 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:39 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Visitor access

 

We are having a increasing number of parents and prospective students who
are visiting to tour the campus requesting access to our wireless network.
I was wondering what other schools are doing to accommodate these requests.

 

 

Thank you

Bruce Entwistle

Network Manager

University of Redlands

 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 























.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
image001.jpg

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: 802.1x SIP Phone

[Chad Burnham]

HI,

We have some Cisco 7925s that do this.
Chad

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter P Morrissey
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:09 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x SIP Phone

Has anyone come across a SIP phone that does 802.1x? I believe we had an 
Hitachi at one time that did this, but they don't make them anymore.

Pete Morrissey
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.






















.
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: Link LDAP groups to Separate SSIDs for Authentication

[Chad Burnham]

HI Bill,


I wanted to make you aware of http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ - great
product for complex proxy situations.  I realize this would mean ditching
your ACS.

 

CB

 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Williams, Mr.
Michael
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Link LDAP groups to Separate SSIDs for
Authentication

 

All,

 

I have been trying to figure this out but have been unable to find a
solution.  Here is what we are trying to do.

 

1 wireless SSID that is open network which uses a web portal for
authentication- this would be the student network

1 wireless SSID that using 802.1x w/WPA and a splash page -this would be
used for Fac/Staff

 

 

Is it possible to link the Student SSID to only the Student group in LDAP
and the Fac/Staff SSID to only the Fac/Staff using LDAP?  We need want to
keep the Fac/Staff folks from using the open network.  Does anyone have a
similar requirements.

 

We have a Cisco ACS that is linked to LDAP/AD, a WISM and WCS.

 

v/r

 

Mike

 

Michael M. Williams

Network Systems Analyst

Information Technology Services

Tarleton State University

 

Information Technology Services staff will never ask for your password in an
email.  Don't ever email your password to anyone or share confidential
information in emails.

 

Confidentiality Notice:  This electronic message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of the original message.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: Palm Pre Plus Wireless 802.1x connection

[Chad Burnham]

HI Mearl,

 

We have it working - I use a Palm Pre myself – WPA2-ENT
I am on 1.4.5 it worked fine on 1.4.X

 

Also, we had to fingerprint the device/WebOS with Impulse (use that for our 
NAC).

 

Chad

 

Chad D Burnham

Network Planner

University of Denver

University Technology Services

2100 South High Street

Denver CO 80208

303-871-4441 = Desk

303-520-5657 = PCS/Mobile

 

 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Danner, Mearl
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 7:37 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Palm Pre Plus Wireless 802.1x connection

 

Anyone out there have any experience connection a Palm Pre Plus using 802.1x to 
your wireless networks?

 

It’ll connect to WPA personal, but not to our 802.1x using WEP.

 

WebOS version is 1.4.1.1

 

 

Mearl Danner

Systems Programmer

Samford University Technology Services

http://www.samford.edu

 

 

 

 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cellular Holes, FemtoCell, Repeaters

[Chad Burnham]

HI,

 

We have gotten quotes from Mobile Access - get your checkbook
out..Cadillac/Carrier grade equipment and price to go with it.

 

We ended building small solution for small need in one building.

 

CU-Denver Medical Center Campus has a very good installation of a campus
wide DAS (Hospital needs).

 

Chad

 

 

Chad D Burnham

Telecommunications Network Planner

University Technology Services - Network Services

University of Denver 

2100 S. High St. #112

Denver, CO 80210 USA

Desk Phone: 303-871-4441

Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657

FAX: 303-871-2298

 

 

 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Manoj Abeysekera
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:06 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cellular Holes, FemtoCell, Repeaters

 

We have a central Cell tower where service providers have their
Antennas/dish's and everything. DAS system connected to this central
location via fiber. Check vendor Mobile Access  for their solutions. 

However, I wouldn't recommend doing Wi-Fi over it. 

Thanks 
Manoj 



- 

P. Manoj Abeysekera, CWNA
Network Engineer
American University
4200 Wisconsin Ave, NW
Washington DC. 20016 
202-885-2702





From:happell happ...@cofc.edu 
To:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Date:02/11/2010 12:46 PM 
Subject:Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cellular Holes, FemtoCell, Repeaters 
Sent by:The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 

  _  




Thank you for the input Manoj,

What do you connect your DAS to? 
Do you have and antenna on the outside of the building point to the
nearest cell tower? Did you contract with a carrier or vendor to bring
in cell over broadband?

You can see I'm still way back in the research process. We are still
investigating the best method to bring the cell service into the
building.

Thanks again!

Larry Happel
Network Engineer
College of Charleston


On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 12:22 -0500, Manoj Abeysekera wrote:
 We have in-building DAS (Distributed Antenna System) system. That
 carries most cell signal and Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi portion of it will soon find
 it own way thanks to 802.11n (multiple antenna). 
 
 However so far DAS system has been solid for Cell coverage inside all
 buildings. 
 
 Thanks 
 Manoj 
 
 
 
 - 
 
 P. Manoj Abeysekera, CWNA
 Network Engineer
 American University
 4200 Wisconsin Ave, NW
 Washington DC. 20016 
 202-885-2702
 
 
 
 
 From:happell happ...@cofc.edu 
 To:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
 Date:02/11/2010 12:17 PM 
 Subject:[WIRELESS-LAN] Cellular Holes, FemtoCell, Repeaters 
 Sent by:The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
 Listserv WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
 
 __
 
 
 
 We are in the research phase of the installation cycle for a solution
 to
 cellular gaps in buildings around campus. We have looked at Cell
 Towers,
 Cellular Repeaters, and Femtocell solutions.
 
 What kind of solutions have you used to cover cellphone gaps in
 buildings around your campus?
 
 Do you consider your installation successful? 
 
 Thanks,
 Larry Happel
 Network Engineering
 College of Charleston
 Charleston, SC
 
 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
  http://www.educause.edu/groups/ http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 
 ** Participation and subscription information for this
 EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
  http://www.educause.edu/groups/ http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at  http://www.educause.edu/groups/
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature