[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark on Android
I'm new to the list. In searching through the archives, I've noticed that there have been several cases where people have successfully cross-compiled Wireshark (or actually, tshark) for the Android platform. I've been attempting to do this, but without success. Would anyone that has been successful in doing this be willing to contact me off-line to help me out? I have successfuly ported libpcap and tcpdump to Android, but able failing to get past the ./configure stage with this. Thanks in advance for any help. Mark___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] Getting a pcap filename from a Lua script
Hi, I have several Lua scripts that display different analyses on a displayed capture file (*.pcap extension). That is, the capture is opened from outside the script, and only after that can the scripts be run. I want to save these analyses to a log file. Current I save the log file under the name log_timestamp, where timestamp is the time I created the log. But the timestamp still makes it hard to know for which pcap the log was created, if I run the analyses for several files sequentially. Is there a way to retrieve the capture file name from inside the Lua script, that way I can name the log: filename_log? This will make is easier to link between the log and the pcap it was created for. Regards, Maayan Zadik maay...@designartnetworks.com ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis
Jeorg, eax.c(32) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'gcrypt.h': No such file or directory Ideas anyone? I see you already found and fixed the problem in version 40502. I apologize for accidentally deleting that change from the patch I submitted, Joerg. Thanks for doing that. Also, there's a problem introduced by commenting out some of the code. You noted that you made fixes for these: [ 64%] Building C object epan/CMakeFiles/epan.dir/dissectors/packet-c1222.c.o ../../asn1/c1222/packet-c1222-template.c: In function ‘dissect_epsem’: ../../asn1/c1222/packet-c1222-template.c:860:15: error: variable ‘ft’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] [ 5%] Building C object epan/CMakeFiles/epan.dir/dissectors/packet-c1222.c.o ../../asn1/c1222/packet-c1222-template.c:103:19: error: ‘c1222_flags’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-variable] and I see the code you've commented out. However, that also eliminates some functionality. Specifically that causes autogenerated code to parse the flags. With the code intact, we get this (an extract from tshark): user-information C12.22 EPSEM Flags: 0x88, C12.22 Reserved Flag, C12.22 Security Mode Flags: Ciphertext with authentication, C12.22 Response Control Flags: Always respond 1... = C12.22 Reserved Flag: True .0.. = C12.22 Recovery Flag: False ..0. = C12.22 Proxy Service Used Flag: False ...0 = C12.22 ED Class Flag: False 10.. = C12.22 Security Mode Flags: Ciphertext with authentication (0x02) ..00 = C12.22 Response Control Flags: Always respond (0x00) C12.22 EPSEM: OK C12.22 Response: OK (0x00) Without the code, we get this: user-information C12.22 EPSEM: OK C12.22 Response: OK (0x00) I don't seem to get the same warning using MSC2008EE here. There must be some way to eliminate the warning without sacrificing the feature. Can you tell me how you got those warnings? I may be able to help. Ed ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] running a lua function via tshark
HI, I have a lua script range_check.lua It has a function range_check(), which checks the ranges of the fields of each packet in a pcap file, and it is registered to the menu MENU_TOOLS_UNSORTED It runs different tests on each packet and saves to a file the Error Log, using a Listener and Field Extractors. This works great in wireshark. I tried running: tshark -X lua_script:range_check.lua -q -r my_capture.pcap but -X lua_script:range_check.lua just loads reange_check, it does no run the function range_check() on the pcap. Is there a way to run range_check()on a given pcap file via tshark? Regards, Maayan Zadik maay...@designartnetworks.com ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Getting a pcap filename from a Lua script
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Maayan Zadik maay...@designartnetworks.com
wrote:
**
Is there a way to retrieve the capture file name from inside the Lua
script, that way I can name the log: “filename_log”?
Someone
askedhttp://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/201109/msg00095.html
about
this a few months ago. No, the Lua API currently does not support this, but
there might be other ways to accomplish the same goal:
1) Pass environment variable, containing the filename, to the Lua script
echo print('\$PCAP:', os.getenv('PCAP')) foo.lua
PCAP=foo.pcap tshark -r foo.pcap -Xlua_script:foo.lua -q
2) Print to stdout from Lua, and redirect to file
tshark -r foo.pcap -Xlua_script:foo.lua -q foo.pcap.analysis.txt
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] running a lua function via tshark
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Maayan Zadik maay...@designartnetworks.com wrote: I have a lua script range_check.lua It has a function range_check(), which checks the ranges of the fields of each packet in a pcap file, and it is registered to the menu “MENU_TOOLS_UNSORTED” I tried running: tshark -X lua_script:range_check.lua -q -r my_capture.pcap but “-X lua_script:range_check.lua” just loads reange_check, it does no run the function “range_check()” on the pcap. ** ** Is there a way to run “range_check()“on a given pcap file via tshark? I'm guessing the Listener/Tap is only registered in the menu callback. In TShark, you want the tap to auto-register. If you're indeed doing this already, please provide a snippet. Your script should check gui_enabledhttp://wiki.wireshark.org/LuaAPI/GUI#gui_enabled.28.29 () (or the variable GUI_ENABLED) to determine whether the tap registration should occur by menu or automatically (see similar examplehttp://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/201201/msg00048.html ). ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:55:33AM -0500, Ed Beroset wrote: and I see the code you've commented out. However, that also eliminates some functionality. Specifically that causes autogenerated code to parse the flags. With the code intact, we get this (an extract from tshark): I overdid things: I should have only removed the variable ft and all would have been fine. I've corrected that in commit 40516. Sorry Joerg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] Buildbot status (Ubuntu-10.04-x64)
The biuldbot Ubuntu-10.04-x64 is not doing anything and hasn't for two days. Pinging works, triggering a build doesn't work. I tried to stop the current build (although it doesn't look like there is one going on) but the system requested a password to do that - and I'm not aware that I have such a password. Can someone who has the necessary permissions please take a look (or let me know how to do it myself)? Thanks Joerg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-dev] Use of deprecated glib function
Hello, compiling with current glib (2.31.6) dies with: [ 95%] Building C object plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/mate_runtime.c.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'destroy_mate_pdus': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:64: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'destroy_mate_gops': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:81: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'destroy_mate_gogs': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:99: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'initialize_mate_runtime': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:143: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_new' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:48) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'new_gop': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:176: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_alloc' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:52) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'new_gog': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:240: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_alloc' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:52) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'new_pdu': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:712: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_alloc' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:52) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'mate_analyze_frame': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:883: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:894: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) make[2]: *** [plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/mate_runtime.c.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 The only places where g_mem_chunk_free is still used seem to be plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c and plugins/mate/mate_util.c. Someone willing to fix this? Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of deprecated glib function
On 1/15/2012 12:41 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: Hello, compiling with current glib (2.31.6) dies with: [ 95%] Building C object plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/mate_runtime.c.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'destroy_mate_pdus': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:64: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'destroy_mate_gops': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:81: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'destroy_mate_gogs': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:99: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'initialize_mate_runtime': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:143: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_new' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:48) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'new_gop': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:176: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_alloc' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:52) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'new_gog': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:240: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_alloc' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:52) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'new_pdu': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:712: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_alloc' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:52) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function 'mate_analyze_frame': /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:883: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) /Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c:894: warning: 'g_mem_chunk_free' is deprecated (declared at /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:57) make[2]: *** [plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/mate_runtime.c.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 The only places where g_mem_chunk_free is still used seem to be plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c and plugins/mate/mate_util.c. Someone willing to fix this? Ciao Joerg Funny you should ask... I'm actually just in the midst of making the changes (and learning about MATE). Bill ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of deprecated glib function
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 06:41:33PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote: compiling with current glib (2.31.6) dies with: Correction: 2.31.8 -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40518: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/: plugins.c timestamp.c /trunk/gtk/: CMakeLists.txt Makefile.am Makefile.common Makefile.nmake Makefile_custom.common STATUS.gtk3
On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:59 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40518 User: jmayer Date: 2012/01/15 01:59 PM Log: Move gtk to ui/gtk. Should those files in the top-level images directory that are only used by UI code be moved a ui/images directory? A quick scan of the source finds a bunch of includes of XPM files from ui/gtk/*.c files; I'm guessing that they - the .xpm files - would only be used by UI code, making them candidates to be moved. I'm not sure where the .png files are used - are they used as source to generate files such as ui/gtk/expert_indicators.h? If so, they'd be candidates as well. (And, if so, what tool is used to generate them?) The same applies for expert_indicators.svg. Should anything used only by packaging/installer tools be put into packaging/images or, if they're specific to a particular package type/installer, an images subdirectory or the top-level directory for that packaging/installer tool? ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40518: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/: plugins.c timestamp.c /trunk/gtk/: CMakeLists.txt Makefile.am Makefile.common Makefile.nmake Makefile_custom.common STATUS.gtk3
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 03:05:41PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:59 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40518 User: jmayer Date: 2012/01/15 01:59 PM Log: Move gtk to ui/gtk. Should those files in the top-level images directory that are only used by UI code be moved a ui/images directory? A quick scan of the source finds a bunch of includes of XPM files from ui/gtk/*.c files; I'm guessing that they - the .xpm files - would only be used by UI code, making them candidates to be moved. I'm not sure where the .png files are used - are they used as source to generate files such as ui/gtk/expert_indicators.h? If so, they'd be candidates as well. (And, if so, what tool is used to generate them?) The same applies for expert_indicators.svg. Should anything used only by packaging/installer tools be put into packaging/images or, if they're specific to a particular package type/installer, an images subdirectory or the top-level directory for that packaging/installer tool? Moving the .xpms into ui/ makes sense to me. I'm not sure whether separating the different image type is useful, but from a usage point of view moving the relevant files to packaging/images/ sounds better to me - hmm, or not: If icons/pictures are used in more than one place, we will run into consistency problems - iff they are used in more than one place. And eventually tshark should probably go into ui/text/ as well as all the non-interactive text tools like editcap, dumpcap etc. But I will call it a day (or night) for now. Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTK3 for OSX
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 05:11:41PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: On Dec 30, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: Just a question I've been toying with: Would it be ok/make sense to move the official builds on OSX from GTK2 to GTK3? Depends on: * Does GTK3 compile? For GTK2 we need some patches? * Is it stable for releases? I haven't tried it yet? OK, here's the state of GTK3 on OSX: You can try for yourself by running the current version of the macos-setup.sh script (with the variable GTK3=1 (and optionally CMAKE=1). The autotool path will compile. With the cmake path there is a problem that -lfreetype is linked against but -L/usr/X11/lib is missing. If you work around that by manually adjusting the link.txt file for wireshark, wireshark will compile. The only thing that fails to build it the mate plugin because the cmake stuff is set up to treat the use of deprecated glib functions as errors. Testers welcome! Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Buildbot status (Ubuntu-10.04-x64)
On 1/15/12 9:33 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: The biuldbot Ubuntu-10.04-x64 is not doing anything and hasn't for two days. Pinging works, triggering a build doesn't work. I tried to stop the current build (although it doesn't look like there is one going on) but the system requested a password to do that - and I'm not aware that I have such a password. Can someone who has the necessary permissions please take a look (or let me know how to do it myself)? It (and the Win 7 builder) have been nudged. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40518: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/: plugins.c timestamp.c /trunk/gtk/: CMakeLists.txt Makefile.am Makefile.common Makefile.nmake Makefile_custom.common STATUS.gtk3
On 1/15/12 3:05 PM, Guy Harris wrote: On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:59 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40518 User: jmayer Date: 2012/01/15 01:59 PM Log: Move gtk to ui/gtk. Should those files in the top-level images directory that are only used by UI code be moved a ui/images directory? Probably. A quick scan of the source finds a bunch of includes of XPM files from ui/gtk/*.c files; I'm guessing that they - the .xpm files - would only be used by UI code, making them candidates to be moved. N. B. Moving forward I'd prefer to migrate away from XPM to formats with better alpha transparency support. I'm not sure where the .png files are used - are they used as source to generate files such as ui/gtk/expert_indicators.h? If so, they'd be candidates as well. (And, if so, what tool is used to generate them?) The same applies for expert_indicators.svg. expert_indicators.h is generated from expert*.png using gdk-pixbuf-csource. The .png files were exported manually from expert_indicators.svg. Should anything used only by packaging/installer tools be put into packaging/images or, if they're specific to a particular package type/installer, an images subdirectory or the top-level directory for that packaging/installer tool? Sounds reasonable. It might help make things more obvious for downstream packagers. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
