Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
Laurie have you considered adding other modes for WAS track? or was it always JT65/JT9? -- Original Message -- From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: 7/11/2017 1:19:51 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution On 12/07/2017 4:10 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: RR, Laurie. My mistake as mentioned in the other post. I will claim I did it so developers of other software get a head start. BTW I did some basic tests with JTAlert using it to initiate MSK144 and FT8 QSOs from alerts. This was necessary as I fixed a few problems with the content of the UDP messages. Apart from the already discussed and deferred issues of dealing with shorter than 60s T/R periods both worked just fine, thanks. 73 Bill G4WJS. Hi Bill, Thanks for the UDP test feedback. I am still considering how best to handle the 15s T/R period of FT8. Regarding the broken JTAlert docking with WSJT-X when a configuration switch is made, that is now fixed for the next release. (I used the Close event to set a flag indicating that the hWnds needed to be refreshed which are then updated on the next Heartbeat). de Laurie VK3AMA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
On 12/07/2017 4:10 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: RR, Laurie. My mistake as mentioned in the other post. I will claim I did it so developers of other software get a head start. BTW I did some basic tests with JTAlert using it to initiate MSK144 and FT8 QSOs from alerts. This was necessary as I fixed a few problems with the content of the UDP messages. Apart from the already discussed and deferred issues of dealing with shorter than 60s T/R periods both worked just fine, thanks. 73 Bill G4WJS. Hi Bill, Thanks for the UDP test feedback. I am still considering how best to handle the 15s T/R period of FT8. Regarding the broken JTAlert docking with WSJT-X when a configuration switch is made, that is now fixed for the next release. (I used the Close event to set a flag indicating that the hWnds needed to be refreshed which are then updated on the next Heartbeat). de Laurie VK3AMA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
On 11/07/2017 18:24, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote: I bet, most people are running r7843 (as am I) because Sourceforge sent an announcement email (to subscribers) that the rc1 installer was available for download. RR, Laurie. My mistake as mentioned in the other post. I will claim I did it so developers of other software get a head start. BTW I did some basic tests with JTAlert using it to initiate MSK144 and FT8 QSOs from alerts. This was necessary as I fixed a few problems with the content of the UDP messages. Apart from the already discussed and deferred issues of dealing with shorter than 60s T/R periods both worked just fine, thanks. 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
Because I saw somewhere that you would prefer for people to only run the official ones for now I downloaded from Joes link and it is 7843 so should I stop using it and build from JTSDK as normal ? Joe has released it so I fail to understand how it could be an unofficial source ? I am out so will leave Joes version r7843 running but can always close it if prefered and make one from JTSDK Regards Richard G7OED -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:07 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution On 11/07/2017 12:35, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote: Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files all over social media. Seeing posts crop up everywhere. Hi James, I'm afraid it is worse than that, looking at the pskreporter stats I see that the most common version is a revision that is not the one that will be the RC1 release. I guess as usual some bright spark thinks they can pretend to be beating the system by building and distributing a kit before the official announcement. Fair notice to anyone who has downloaded WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 from an unofficial source, r7843 is not going to be the official release revision and whoever supplied it to you is not complying with our wishes to not distribute unofficial binary installers of WSJT-X. There appear to be at least 138 of you out there, perhaps we should ask Philip to name and shame! 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
On 11/07/2017 12:35, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote: Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files all over social media. Seeing posts crop up everywhere. Hi James, I'm afraid it is worse than that, looking at the pskreporter stats I see that the most common version is a revision that is not the one that will be the RC1 release. I guess as usual some bright spark thinks they can pretend to be beating the system by building and distributing a kit before the official announcement. Fair notice to anyone who has downloaded WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 from an unofficial source, r7843 is not going to be the official release revision and whoever supplied it to you is not complying with our wishes to not distribute unofficial binary installers of WSJT-X. There appear to be at least 138 of you out there, perhaps we should ask Philip to name and shame! 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Distribution
Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files. There have been posts all over Facebook so far and people are downloading like crazy. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Distribution
Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files all over social media. Seeing posts crop up everywhere. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
