[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Tom Banting wrote: > I have seen this too but only once. > Unfortunately I didn't save the file or look into it further. > I do not use any filters. > At 03:34 PM 19/01/2005, you wrote: > > Please, Davide: > > Remember my problem on Xmail 1.21 over W2000 (mail "RE: problem with > spool file"; 12/30/2004): > my spool structure shows spool errors in the Event Manager regulary (a > few per day). The server works, and the file system is REALLY OK. > > An example: > "... > ErrCode =3D -56 > ErrString =3D Invalid spool file > Unable to load spool file > "\\?\f:\mailroot\spool\14\20\mess\1105820563391.2044.3e.apolo.rej"= > SMTP-Error =3D "554 Error loading spool file" > ... " > > Is the problem the ".rej" ? > The documentation refers ".rej" as the extension of a file response with > filters processing, and I=B4m not using them (I mean a ".rej" file; I use > filters, of course). XMail automatically load and remove those files after a filter execution. If the filter executable though, takes too much time and timeout, XMail continues, and if the filter generates the .rej after that, it will remain there. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
I have seen this too but only once. Unfortunately I didn't save the file or look into it further. I do not use any filters. At 03:34 PM 19/01/2005, you wrote: Please, Davide: Remember my problem on Xmail 1.21 over W2000 (mail "RE: problem with spool file"; 12/30/2004): my spool structure shows spool errors in the Event Manager regulary (a few per day). The server works, and the file system is REALLY OK. An example: "... ErrCode =3D -56 ErrString =3D Invalid spool file Unable to load spool file "\\?\f:\mailroot\spool\14\20\mess\1105820563391.2044.3e.apolo.rej"= SMTP-Error =3D "554 Error loading spool file" ... " Is the problem the ".rej" ? The documentation refers ".rej" as the extension of a file response with filters processing, and I=B4m not using them (I mean a ".rej" file; I use filters, of course). Sergio Perrone Davide Libenzi wrote: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
Just to let anyone be sure that there's no problem with the spool files, neither with XMail itself. The problem we noticed was a loop caused by an error in a redirection with custdomains. Ee found it checking mail by mail and finally noticed that. So there are no kind of ghost in 1.21, only human mistakes. The extrange thing is that with 1.15 and 1.17 the loop appears not to be happening or maybe XMail acted slowly and didn't "eat" so much CPU as the loop does in 1.21 Daniel Serena > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Please do that. If you guys do not send thos info, I cannot debug=20 > problems. And they'll come back biting you later ... > > > > - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
No, just AVG console working with 'xav' (Denis Olivier). The active scanning is disabled. The server has two hard disks, with RAID mirroring. Sergio Bill Healy wrote: >Do you have a virus scanner that could be locking or moving the files if >infected? > >Bill > > > >>-- >>From: Sergio Perrone[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 12:34 PM >>To: xmail@xmailserver.org >>Subject: [xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21 >> >> >>Please, Davide: >> >>Remember my problem on Xmail 1.21 over W2000 (mail "RE: problem with=20 >>spool file"; 12/30/2004): >>my spool structure shows spool errors in the Event Manager regulary (a=20 >>few per day). The server works, and the file system is REALLY OK. >> >>An example: >>" ... >>ErrCode =3D -56 >>ErrString =3D Invalid spool file >>Unable to load spool file=20 >>"\\?\f:\mailroot\spool\14\20\mess\1105820563391.2044.3e.apolo.rej" >>SMTP-Error =3D "554 Error loading spool file" >>... " >> >>Is the problem the ".rej" ? >>The documentation refers ".rej" as the extension of a file response = >> >> >with=20 > > >>filters processing, and I=B4m not using them (I mean a ".rej" file; I = >> >> >use=20 > > >>filters, of course). >> >>Sergio Perrone >> >>Davide Libenzi wrote: >> >> >> >>>// ... >>>Please do that. If you guys do not send thos info, I cannot debug=20 >>>problems. And they'll come back biting you later ... >>> >>> >>> >>>- Davide >>>... // >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>- >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
Do you have a virus scanner that could be locking or moving the files if infected? Bill >-- >From: Sergio Perrone[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 12:34 PM >To:xmail@xmailserver.org >Subject: [xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21 > > >Please, Davide: > >Remember my problem on Xmail 1.21 over W2000 (mail "RE: problem with=20 >spool file"; 12/30/2004): >my spool structure shows spool errors in the Event Manager regulary (a=20 >few per day). The server works, and the file system is REALLY OK. > >An example: >" ... >ErrCode =3D -56 >ErrString =3D Invalid spool file >Unable to load spool file=20 >"\\?\f:\mailroot\spool\14\20\mess\1105820563391.2044.3e.apolo.rej" >SMTP-Error =3D "554 Error loading spool file" > ... " > >Is the problem the ".rej" ? >The documentation refers ".rej" as the extension of a file response = with=20 >filters processing, and I=B4m not using them (I mean a ".rej" file; I = use=20 >filters, of course). > >Sergio Perrone > >Davide Libenzi wrote: > >>// ... >>Please do that. If you guys do not send thos info, I cannot debug=20 >>problems. And they'll come back biting you later ... >> >> >> >>- Davide >>... // >> =20 >> > > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
Please, Davide: Remember my problem on Xmail 1.21 over W2000 (mail "RE: problem with spool file"; 12/30/2004): my spool structure shows spool errors in the Event Manager regulary (a few per day). The server works, and the file system is REALLY OK. An example: " ... ErrCode = -56 ErrString = Invalid spool file Unable to load spool file "\\?\f:\mailroot\spool\14\20\mess\1105820563391.2044.3e.apolo.rej" SMTP-Error = "554 Error loading spool file" ... " Is the problem the ".rej" ? The documentation refers ".rej" as the extension of a file response with filters processing, and I´m not using them (I mean a ".rej" file; I use filters, of course). Sergio Perrone Davide Libenzi wrote: >// ... >Please do that. If you guys do not send thos info, I cannot debug >problems. And they'll come back biting you later ... > > > >- Davide >... // > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Daniel Serena wrote: > Solved. > > Theres something on the queue. > > I've moved everything that was on the spool > directory. > > Then restarted, and now it works fine with 1.21. > > Some mail should be a bad one to the 1.21 and > seems to be right to 1.17 or 1.15. > > I'll check for it to know exactly the one that > makes this CPU problems in to XMail. Please do that. If you guys do not send thos info, I cannot debug problems. And they'll come back biting you later ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
Solved. Theres something on the queue. I've moved everything that was on the spool directory. Then restarted, and now it works fine with 1.21. Some mail should be a bad one to the 1.21 and seems to be right to 1.17 or 1.15. I'll check for it to know exactly the one that makes this CPU problems in to XMail. Daniel Serena > Just it it helps, the procesess taking > CPU are sleeping according to top output. > Those ara a few lines from top: > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 1547 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 5.7 0.2 0:25 XMail > 1511 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 3.9 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1522 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 3.6 0.2 0:24 XMail > 1497 root 15 0 5672 5672 1280 S 3.4 0.2 0:24 XMail > 1504 root 15 0 5668 5668 1280 S 3.4 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1505 root 15 0 5672 5672 1280 S 3.1 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1546 root 15 0 5660 5660 1280 S 2.9 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1527 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.8 0.2 0:24 XMail > 1534 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.6 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1556 root 15 0 5668 5668 1280 S 2.6 0.2 0:27 XMail > 1484 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.4 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1485 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.4 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1542 root 15 0 5672 5672 1280 S 2.4 0.2 0:23 XMail > 1506 root 15 0 5668 5668 1280 S 2.3 0.2 0:24 XMail > 1514 root 15 0 5660 5660 1280 S 2.3 0.2 0:23 XMail > > If it may help, the server has SMP (2 CPU) > > Daniel Serena > > > > Hi. > > > > I've installed 1.21 on Linux (Suse 8.1). > > > > For some reason it takes a lot more > > CPU use than 1.15 or 1.17 (I've tested both > > ones to check it). > > > > Just changing the binaries from > > one version to the other seems to get > > a higher CPU load. With 1.15 or 1.17 > > the uptime is between 0.20 and 2.00 > > more or less. > > > > With 1.21 uptime goes between 4.50 and 9.00 > > more or less. > > > > If you issue a "top", the diference is that > > every XMail process gets a %CPU higer with > > 1.21 than with the other versions. Between > > 2.10% and 4.20% with 1.21. > > > > With 1.17 for example I get a few theads using > > same even higher CPU load (4% to 8% of CPU), > > but most of the threads are with about 1.0% > > or 0.7%. > > > > There's possible any reason for that? > > > > I've tried running in debug mode but everything > > seems to be ok. > > > > Daniel Serena > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CPU use with 1.21
Just it it helps, the procesess taking CPU are sleeping according to top output. Those ara a few lines from top: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 1547 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 5.7 0.2 0:25 XMail 1511 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 3.9 0.2 0:23 XMail 1522 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 3.6 0.2 0:24 XMail 1497 root 15 0 5672 5672 1280 S 3.4 0.2 0:24 XMail 1504 root 15 0 5668 5668 1280 S 3.4 0.2 0:23 XMail 1505 root 15 0 5672 5672 1280 S 3.1 0.2 0:23 XMail 1546 root 15 0 5660 5660 1280 S 2.9 0.2 0:23 XMail 1527 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.8 0.2 0:24 XMail 1534 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.6 0.2 0:23 XMail 1556 root 15 0 5668 5668 1280 S 2.6 0.2 0:27 XMail 1484 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.4 0.2 0:23 XMail 1485 root 15 0 5664 5664 1280 S 2.4 0.2 0:23 XMail 1542 root 15 0 5672 5672 1280 S 2.4 0.2 0:23 XMail 1506 root 15 0 5668 5668 1280 S 2.3 0.2 0:24 XMail 1514 root 15 0 5660 5660 1280 S 2.3 0.2 0:23 XMail If it may help, the server has SMP (2 CPU) Daniel Serena > Hi. > > I've installed 1.21 on Linux (Suse 8.1). > > For some reason it takes a lot more > CPU use than 1.15 or 1.17 (I've tested both > ones to check it). > > Just changing the binaries from > one version to the other seems to get > a higher CPU load. With 1.15 or 1.17 > the uptime is between 0.20 and 2.00 > more or less. > > With 1.21 uptime goes between 4.50 and 9.00 > more or less. > > If you issue a "top", the diference is that > every XMail process gets a %CPU higer with > 1.21 than with the other versions. Between > 2.10% and 4.20% with 1.21. > > With 1.17 for example I get a few theads using > same even higher CPU load (4% to 8% of CPU), > but most of the threads are with about 1.0% > or 0.7%. > > There's possible any reason for that? > > I've tried running in debug mode but everything > seems to be ok. > > Daniel Serena - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
