[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
>I do not plan to put that in 1.21, so ATM you can wrap GLST with a script, or you can even modify its source to return 0 based on @@USERAUTH. Ok. I definitely won't wrap it within another script, because I try to reduce the number of processes I spawn since I run Windows. I realize process spawning is not a big deal with Unix variants, but it kills performance under Windows in a fast hurry. My best bet is probably to edit the GLST code to return 0 based on @@USERAUTH. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote: > >Try 0.21 and the new --mnet option ... > > > >http://www.xmailserver.org/glst-mod.html > > > > Very cool. BTW, did you get a chance to add any options for SMTP AUTH > users? I need an option to whitelist the SMTP AUTH users. I do not plan to put that in 1.21, so ATM you can wrap GLST with a script, or you can even modify its source to return 0 based on @@USERAUTH. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
>Try 0.21 and the new --mnet option ... > >http://www.xmailserver.org/glst-mod.html > Very cool. BTW, did you get a chance to add any options for SMTP AUTH users? I need an option to whitelist the SMTP AUTH users. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
I would not even try using Access for a busy email server. Access works awesome when you have one connection at a time. By the time you hit 5 simultaneous connections, Access is definitely not the best choice. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 6:09 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block Michal,=20 If it isn't going too far off topic, what did you use for your database? = I of course have SQL server, but was writing one for anyone to use (in = ..NET of course). I chose to use an Access DB, but am wondering how robust it = will be for people with extremely busy mail servers (been working well on = mine both in SQL and Access). I've heard Access databases don't hold well to multiple users (as each filter is an application launch in .NET) This is all a part of a collection of filters I've been writing. One = filter for example is a pre-data filter for SPF and RBL checking. Another is a greylist filter. And yet another is a direct SPAMC filter, with a bunch = of options for rejecting, spamboxing, etc... Jason J Ellingson Sr. Web Software Developer 615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of Michal Altair Valasek Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 4:20 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Greylisting for entire IP block Hello, I started using new greylisting module (Thanks! I almost managed to = write my own). But I quickly fell into one caveat described even in Greylisting whitepaper at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html = (is discussed in section "Issues Affecting The Proposed Implementation"): Some e-mail systems (in my case Gmail) are using different IP for = outgoing SMTP connections. Solution proposed in the whitepaper is to whitelist = entire /24 subnet. May you please implement this (maybe as option)?=20 -- Michal Altair Valasek, ASP.NET MVP __ALTAIR-COMMUNICATIONS http://www.altaircom.net | http://www.rider.cz | http://weblog.rider.cz [EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP 0xC4F3579D | ICQ 6160893 I'm not cynical. Just experienced. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
| Try 0.21 and the new --mnet option ... | | http://www.xmailserver.org/glst-mod.html Thanks, you almighty ;-) -- Altair - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Michal Altair Valasek wrote: > Hello, > > I started using new greylisting module (Thanks! I almost managed to write my > own). But I quickly fell into one caveat described even in Greylisting > whitepaper at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html (is > discussed in section "Issues Affecting The Proposed Implementation"): > > Some e-mail systems (in my case Gmail) are using different IP for outgoing > SMTP connections. Solution proposed in the whitepaper is to whitelist entire > /24 subnet. > > May you please implement this (maybe as option)? Try 0.21 and the new --mnet option ... http://www.xmailserver.org/glst-mod.html - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
| If it isn't going too far off topic, what did you use for | your database? I use SQL Server for everything. For users withount SQL license is available MSDE (free for everyone), which is exactly the same as SQL server, but limited to 5 simultaneous queries. I can't recommend Access, it's not reliable for anything other than single-user databases. -- Michal A. Valasek, Microsoft ASP.NET MVP ASP Network - vse o Microsoft technologiich pro Internet ___ http://www.aspnetwork.cz | [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no place like 127.0.0.1 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
Look into SQLite, it will work perfectly for what you want. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:09 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block Michal, If it isn't going too far off topic, what did you use for your database? I of course have SQL server, but was writing one for anyone to use (in .NET of course). I chose to use an Access DB, but am wondering how robust it will be for people with extremely busy mail servers (been working well on mine both in SQL and Access). I've heard Access databases don't hold well to multiple users (as each filter is an application launch in .NET) This is all a part of a collection of filters I've been writing. One filter for example is a pre-data filter for SPF and RBL checking. Another is a greylist filter. And yet another is a direct SPAMC filter, with a bunch of options for rejecting, spamboxing, etc... Jason J Ellingson Sr. Web Software Developer 615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michal Altair Valasek Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 4:20 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Greylisting for entire IP block Hello, I started using new greylisting module (Thanks! I almost managed to write my own). But I quickly fell into one caveat described even in Greylisting whitepaper at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html (is discussed in section "Issues Affecting The Proposed Implementation"): Some e-mail systems (in my case Gmail) are using different IP for outgoing SMTP connections. Solution proposed in the whitepaper is to whitelist entire /24 subnet. May you please implement this (maybe as option)? -- Michal Altair Valasek, ASP.NET MVP __ALTAIR-COMMUNICATIONS http://www.altaircom.net | http://www.rider.cz | http://weblog.rider.cz [EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP 0xC4F3579D | ICQ 6160893 I'm not cynical. Just experienced. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Greylisting for entire IP block
Michal, If it isn't going too far off topic, what did you use for your database? I of course have SQL server, but was writing one for anyone to use (in .NET of course). I chose to use an Access DB, but am wondering how robust it will be for people with extremely busy mail servers (been working well on mine both in SQL and Access). I've heard Access databases don't hold well to multiple users (as each filter is an application launch in .NET) This is all a part of a collection of filters I've been writing. One filter for example is a pre-data filter for SPF and RBL checking. Another is a greylist filter. And yet another is a direct SPAMC filter, with a bunch of options for rejecting, spamboxing, etc... Jason J Ellingson Sr. Web Software Developer 615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michal Altair Valasek Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 4:20 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Greylisting for entire IP block Hello, I started using new greylisting module (Thanks! I almost managed to write my own). But I quickly fell into one caveat described even in Greylisting whitepaper at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html (is discussed in section "Issues Affecting The Proposed Implementation"): Some e-mail systems (in my case Gmail) are using different IP for outgoing SMTP connections. Solution proposed in the whitepaper is to whitelist entire /24 subnet. May you please implement this (maybe as option)? -- Michal Altair Valasek, ASP.NET MVP __ALTAIR-COMMUNICATIONS http://www.altaircom.net | http://www.rider.cz | http://weblog.rider.cz [EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP 0xC4F3579D | ICQ 6160893 I'm not cynical. Just experienced. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
