Re: [Xcb] [PATCH] Update DRI2 requests and replies for version 1.3.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:39:02 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > --- > src/dri2.xml | 75 > +- > 1 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/dri2.xml b/src/dri2.xml > index dbd43f8..70c569d 100644 > --- a/src/dri2.xml > +++ b/src/dri2.xml > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > >
Re: [Xcb] [PATCH] Update DRI2 requests and replies for version 1.3.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:12:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:39:02 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > --- > > src/dri2.xml | 75 > > +- > > 1 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/dri2.xml b/src/dri2.xml > > index dbd43f8..70c569d 100644 > > --- a/src/dri2.xml > > +++ b/src/dri2.xml > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > > > >
Re: [Xcb] [PATCH] Update DRI2 requests and replies for version 1.3.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 13:06:33 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > What's up with DRI2BufferSwapComplete? It's larger than 32 bytes. Cheers, Julien ___ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Xcb] [PATCH] Update DRI2 requests and replies for version 1.3.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:02:10 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > Here's the actual patch I meant to send. What should we do about > SwapComplete? > I guess for the current (1.3) protocol version, not pretending that SwapComplete has a sbc_lo field is the easiest, since the server will never send it anyway. Cheers, Julien ___ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Xcb] [PATCH] Update DRI2 requests and replies for version 1.3.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:04:58 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:02:10 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > Here's the actual patch I meant to send. What should we do about > > SwapComplete? > > > I guess for the current (1.3) protocol version, not pretending that > SwapComplete has a sbc_lo field is the easiest, since the server will > never send it anyway. Yeah, the server will drop part of it; we can just truncate those fields from 8 to 6 bits and make them padding instead. We'll need a new event to send all the bits. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
