Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading my ZFS server
I did not use the Marvell nic. I use an Intel gigabit pci nic (e1000g0). On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, SV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > js.lists , or anyone else who is using a XFX MDA72P7509 Motherboard --- > > that onboard NIC is a Marvell? - Do you choose not to use it in favor of the > Intel PCI NIC? > Marvell provides Solaris 10 x86/x64 drivers on their website, I was hoping > the Marvell works in Opensolaris, because 97% of the AMD motherboard I > researched have a Realtek NIC which I don't want. > > XFX's website is one of those "register your serial number to get access". I > hate those manufacturers that don't let you research the details before you > buy! > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading my ZFS server
js.lists , or anyone else who is using a XFX MDA72P7509 Motherboard --- that onboard NIC is a Marvell? - Do you choose not to use it in favor of the Intel PCI NIC? Marvell provides Solaris 10 x86/x64 drivers on their website, I was hoping the Marvell works in Opensolaris, because 97% of the AMD motherboard I researched have a Realtek NIC which I don't want. XFX's website is one of those "register your serial number to get access". I hate those manufacturers that don't let you research the details before you buy! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading my ZFS server
Just an update to this thread with my results. To summarize, I have no problems with the nVidia 750a chipset. It's simply a newer version of the 5** series chipets that have reportedly worked well. Also, at IDLE, this system uses 133 Watts: CPU - AMD Athlon X2 4850e Motherboard - XFX MD-A72P-7509 * nVidia nForce 750a SLI chipset * 6x SATA, 1x eSATA * 2x PCIe 2.0 x16 slots * nVidia GeForce 8 series integrated video * 1x Marvell gigabit ethernet (disabled in BIOS 2x Kingston 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM ECC Unbuffered DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Server Memory 2x Intel PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter (82541PI) 6x Maxtor 6L300S0 drives (SATA) 1x 80GB IDE drive (OS) # uname -a SunOS 5.11 snv_96 i86pc i386 i86pc # psrinfo -pv The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1) x86 (AuthenticAMD 60FB2 family 15 model 107 step 2 clock 2500 MHz) AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e # isainfo -bv 64-bit amd64 applications tscp ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu # prtconf -D System Configuration: Sun Microsystems i86pc Memory size: 3840 Megabytes System Peripherals (Software Nodes): i86pc (driver name: rootnex) scsi_vhci, instance #0 (driver name: scsi_vhci) isa, instance #0 (driver name: isa) asy, instance #0 (driver name: asy) motherboard pit_beep, instance #0 (driver name: pit_beep) pci, instance #0 (driver name: npe) pci10de,cb84 pci10de,cb84 pci10de,cb84 pci10de,cb84 pci10de,cb84 pci10de,cb84 pci10de,cb84, instance #0 (driver name: ohci) pci10de,cb84, instance #0 (driver name: ehci) pci10de,cb84, instance #1 (driver name: ohci) pci10de,cb84, instance #1 (driver name: ehci) pci-ide, instance #0 (driver name: pci-ide) ide, instance #0 (driver name: ata) cmdk, instance #0 (driver name: cmdk) ide (driver name: ata) pci10de,75a, instance #0 (driver name: pci_pci) pci8086,1376, instance #0 (driver name: e1000g) pci8086,1376, instance #1 (driver name: e1000g) pci10de,cb84, instance #0 (driver name: ahci) disk, instance #1 (driver name: sd) disk, instance #2 (driver name: sd) disk, instance #3 (driver name: sd) disk, instance #4 (driver name: sd) disk, instance #5 (driver name: sd) disk, instance #6 (driver name: sd) pci10de,569, instance #1 (driver name: pci_pci) display, instance #0 (driver name: vgatext) pci10de,778 (driver name: pcie_pci) pci10de,75b (driver name: pcie_pci) pci10de,77a (driver name: pcie_pci) pci1022,1100, instance #0 (driver name: mc-amd) pci1022,1101, instance #1 (driver name: mc-amd) pci1022,1102, instance #2 (driver name: mc-amd) pci1022,1103, instance #0 (driver name: amd64_gart) pci, instance #0 (driver name: pci) iscsi, instance #0 (driver name: iscsi) pseudo, instance #0 (driver name: pseudo) options, instance #0 (driver name: options) agpgart, instance #0 (driver name: agpgart) xsvc, instance #0 (driver name: xsvc) used-resources cpus, instance #0 (driver name: cpunex) cpu (driver name: cpudrv) cpu (driver name: cpudrv) # prtdiag System Configuration: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M. BIOS Configuration: American Megatrends Inc. 080015 05/30/2008 Processor Sockets Version Location Tag -- AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU 1 Memory Device Sockets TypeStatus Set Device Locator Bank Locator --- -- --- --- DDR2in use 0 DIMM0 BANK0 DDR2in use 0 DIMM1 BANK1 DDR2in use 0 DIMM2 BANK2 DDR2in use 0 DIMM3 BANK3 On-Board Devices = To Be Filled By O.E.M. Upgradeable Slots ID StatusType Description --- - 0 in useAGP 4X AGP 1 in usePCI PCI1 # cfgadm Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition sata0/0::dsk/c2t0d0disk connectedconfigured ok sata0/1::dsk/c2t1d0disk connectedconfigured ok sata0/2::dsk/c2t2d0disk connectedconfigured ok sata0/3::dsk/c2t3d0disk connectedconfigured ok sata0/4::dsk/c2t4d0disk connectedconfigured ok sata0/5::dsk/c2t5d0disk connectedconfigured ok On Sa
Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading my ZFS server
While I wanted the Intel Core 2 Duo confuration, it was too much money. Even when I substituted the processor for a low power wolfdale, the E7200. The Intel option cost $126 more than the AMD/GeForce option. I was up to $457.88 with shipping and tax. Also, in some power benchmarks, the AMD 4850e did used a lot less power than the most efficient 45nm Intel Core 2 processor, the E7200. Of course, from a performance point of view, the E7200 blows the AMD out of the water, but my needs are for a low-power and 64 bit file server. The AMD 4850e and nForce 750a chipset meets those needs. I'm staying away from any AMD chipsets. There are too many bugs, and I read the brand new AMD 750 chipset has the SAME AHCI issues as the SB600. AMD can't seem to fix it. One other factor that helped in my decision was that Sun sells both X38 and nForce based chipsets in its new workstations. If they work for Sun... I ended up choosing this configuration: > CPU - AMD Athlon X2 4850e 2.5GHz 2 x 512KB L2 Cache Socket AM2 45W > Dual-Core ($77.00) > Motherboard - XFX MDA72P7509 ($134.99) > * nVidia nForce 750a SLI chipset > * 6x SATA, 1x eSATA > * 2x PCIe 2.0 x16 > * nVidia GeForce 8 series integrated video > * 1x Marvell gigabit ethernet At newegg, with tax, shipping, and 4GB of ECC RAM, this cost me $341.71 This solution allows me to add a dual port gigabit ethernet card (PCIe) and the LSI SATA card (PCIe) later on. Thanks for the replies. I will follow up once I get the hardware. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading my ZFS server
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Joe S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I picked the 790GX of the 790 series because it has integrated video. The 790GX is a high-clocked 780G, so look at that chipset as well. The boards are slightly cheaper, too. If you're not overclocking or running Crossfire, there's no reason to use the GX. > Also, I avoided the SB600 southbridge as I have read there are SATA > DMA issues with it. The nForce and AMD chipsets are very new but The SB700 has a few issues with AHCI as well from what I've heard, though the specifics are eluding me at the moment. The SB750 is too new to know but may be an improvement. I'd recommend an LSI 1068e based HBA like the Supermicro AOC-USAS-L8i. You may want to put an Intel NIC into the AMD system, since support with other ethernet solutions seems spotty at best. -B -- Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED] "You can't blow things up with schools and hospitals." -Stephen Dailey ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Upgrading my ZFS server
I'm want to upgrade the hardware of my Open Solaris b95 server at home. It's currently running on 32 bit intel hardware. I'm going 64 bit with the new hardware. I don't need server grade hardware since this is a home server. This means I'm not buying the an Opteron or Xeon, or any quad core processor. These were too expensive for my budget. Desktop grade hardware will be fine. I want something that is energy efficient, not expensive, and with room for expansion. I want multiple PCIe (pci express) slots so that I can add an LSI MPT based SATA HBA (requires x4 or x8) and an Intel dual gigabit nic (requires x4) in the future. I've got my hardware selection down to a few choices and was hoping someone could comment on their experiences with any of this hardware. I've determined that in my situation, the biggest determining factor is how well the chipset is supported in Open Solaris. If I choose to go Intel, I like the Intel X38 chipset because it is the only current Intel chipset that supports ECC memory. This list contains a number of threads encouraging the use of ECC memory, so I'd like to use ECC memory. All of the chipsets I list here support ECC memory. Also, I've read that Open Solaris has better support for CPU frequency scaling on Intel processors than AMD ( < family 16 ) processors. Anyways, here is the Intel configuration I came up with: CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core ($169.99) Motherboard - Intel DX38BT ($209.99) * Intel X38chipset * 6x SATA, 2x eSATA * 2x PCIe 2.0 x16 slots * 1x PCIe 1.0a x16 (electrical x4) * 1x Intel 82566DC gigabit ethernet >From what I read, the X38 is not very different from the 925 chipset which is supported well in Open Solaris. Also, I chose the Intel chipset over the nVidia nForice chipsets because I guessed that Intel CPU + Intel chipset would be a safe bet. For the AMD configuration, I had trouble picking a chipset. nForce or AMD? I don't know. Picking the CPU was easy. Here is the AMD + nForce configuration: CPU - AMD Athlon X2 4850e 2.5GHz 2 x 512KB L2 Cache Socket AM2 45W Dual-Core ($77.00) Motherboard - XFX MDA72P7509 ($134.99) * nVidia nForce 750a SLI chipset * 6x SATA, 1x eSATA * 2x PCIe 2.0 x16 * nVidia GeForce 8 series integrated video * 1x Marvell gigabit ethernet Here is the AMD + AMD 790GX configuration: CPU - AMD Athlon X2 4850e 2.5GHz 2 x 512KB L2 Cache Socket AM2 45W Dual-Core ($77.00) Motherboard - ASUS M3A78-T ($149.99) * AMD 790GX / SB750 chipset * 5x, 1x eSATA (no optimal, since I need 6, but if this is the better chipset, i'll get my sata hba sooner) * 3 x PCIe 2.0 x16 * ATI Radeon HD 3300 GPU * 1x Marvell 88E8056 gigabit ethernet I picked the 790GX of the 790 series because it has integrated video. Also, I avoided the SB600 southbridge as I have read there are SATA DMA issues with it. The nForce and AMD chipsets are very new but aren't too different from their predecessors. I don't mind going AMD because the CPU is rated at 45W, so I won't completely miss the benefits of the CPU frequency scaling that the Intel supports. Right now, I'm leaning towards the AMD + nForce 750a configuration. But the Intel option isn't bad either. Sun sells the Intel X38 in the Ultra 24 workstation. The AMD 790 option is there because I'm not sure which chipset to choose from for AMD processors. So, have any of you used any of these chipsets with Open Solaris? Any success or failure stories? Are there any reasons I should steer far away from any of the above chipsets? Any solid reason I should pick one CPU over the other? Thanks in advance! ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
