Re: (313) P2P Future

2005-01-18 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
The only way forward I can see for artists is this: 1. Give away lossy digital copies of your music, as promotion. 2. Emphasize the audio quality of the 'real thing' -- the paid for copy. 3. Make sure the physical object you're selling adds value over the digital copy -- either by adding

Re: (313) P2P Future

2005-01-18 Thread robin
I like the idea of #3 very much - vinyl only tracks would be a welcome change from CD only tracks plus well designed packaging is always encouraged. Little pluses are so cool - buy a 12 to find a sticker slipped inside. It's fairly common in rock music to find little things like record label

Re: (313) P2P Future

2005-01-17 Thread Simon Kong
This guy wrote a manifesto on the topic . saved me thinking to hard about it all . http://montemagno.typepad.com/p2p_manifesto/ You know the only person making money is the person selling bandwidth . I guess I know where to start investing ' eh Dr. Lester K. Spence wrote: On

Re: (313) P2P Future

2005-01-16 Thread Dr. Lester K. Spence
On Jan 15, 2005, at 12:33 PM, Kent Williams wrote: As far as file copying, CD ripping etc, the piggies are out of the barn. Most DRM systems can be defeated pretty easily, and when all else fails, anyone with a good soundcard can make a high quality digital copy via analog loopback of

(313) P2P Future

2005-01-15 Thread Kent Williams
As far as file copying, CD ripping etc, the piggies are out of the barn. Most DRM systems can be defeated pretty easily, and when all else fails, anyone with a good soundcard can make a high quality digital copy via analog loopback of protected digital files. So DRM is a joke. It only stops