Re: (313) Record packaging [was: (313) mysticism in electronic music (and where has it gone)]

2009-03-19 Thread Martin Dust
On 18 Mar 2009, at 20:20, Tristan Watkins wrote: On 18/03/2009 03:30, JT Stewart wrote: Louis said everything I was going to say (and better) in my response to Tristan. Yeah, I do understand those reasons as an artist, but the more we're talking about this the more I'm wondering if these

Re: (313) Record packaging [was: (313) mysticism in electronic music (and where has it gone)]

2009-03-19 Thread JT Stewart
I complete disagree with this I've always thought that it was the label's job to provide me with the output of the artists, this is just consumer/brand infection, I'm a weapon of mass consumption and I have the right BS, some things are just not products. I absolutely agree. That was

Re: (313) Record packaging [was: (313) mysticism in electronic music (and where has it gone)]

2009-03-19 Thread Martin Dust
On 19 Mar 2009, at 13:23, JT Stewart wrote: I complete disagree with this I've always thought that it was the label's job to provide me with the output of the artists, this is just consumer/brand infection, I'm a weapon of mass consumption and I have the right BS, some things are just not

Re: (313) Record packaging [was: (313) mysticism in electronic music (and where has it gone)]

2009-03-19 Thread JT Stewart
I absolutely agree. That was offensive to me. Job?! I don't want another stinkin' job I wasn't offended, I know where Tristan is coming from. Me too. I was kidding about being lazy.

Re: (313) Record packaging [was: (313) mysticism in electronic music (and where has it gone)]

2009-03-18 Thread Tristan Watkins
On 18/03/2009 03:30, JT Stewart wrote: Louis said everything I was going to say (and better) in my response to Tristan. Yeah, I do understand those reasons as an artist, but the more we're talking about this the more I'm wondering if these aren't purely the concerns of the artist rather