Re: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread David Bate
Hi Matt, That's why another person from Portland, started discogs.com, so that us old folk who's brains are starting to have too many cobwebs, can still get information. Here's the 2 links for Da Sampla off their: http://www.discogs.com/artist/Keith_Tucker_-_Da_Sampla http://www.discogs.com/a

Re: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread Matt MacQueen
On Mar 18, 2004, at 1:44 AM, FC2 Richards wrote: Shake is Da Sampla...is there more than just the Moods & Grooves release out?? I think I have a Da Sampla record on M3? ...hmm the memory fades.. And the Frictional one of course. -- Matt MacQueen http://SonicSunset.com

RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread Andrew
Damn I keep thinking it's Friday! Just wishful thinking... -Original Message- From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 March 2004 15:58 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers >Shake is Da Sampla...is there more than just the Moods &

RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread Andrew
>Shake is Da Sampla...is there more than just the Moods & Grooves >release out?? >not sure, but in the back of my mind I think there might be one on puzzlebox. Yeah, that's Digital System. Didn't know about the Moroder link, cheers! Kraftwerk tomorrow, woohoo! Thanks for the reports so far

RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread Sean Creen
Yep, Piece of Ice (as played on the Claude Yound DJ Kicks mix) was one of the early Puzzlebox releases... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 March 2004 15:49 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers >Shake

RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread alex . bond
>Shake is Da Sampla...is there more than just the Moods & Grooves release >out?? not sure, but in the back of my mind I think there might be one on puzzlebox. not sure though. _ - End of message text ---

RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-18 Thread FC2 Richards
Shake is Da Sampla...is there more than just the Moods & Grooves release out?? -Original Message- From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 6:13 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers Peteri, Jochem wrote: >&g

RE: (313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Andrew
Peteri, Jochem wrote: >>and that da sampla track is awesome, Shake ain´t it? >> >***Yes Man, didn't know that. That's one of my favourites, it sounds fairly unlike any other track I've got. Respect!

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Peteri, Jochem
>Third, even though I love dance music, there's an excitement of a different >flavor that you get from a live, improvisatory performance. Oh so true, and i have to admit i havent figured out yet how to transpose techno to a good live show. But I wasn´t talking about live performances. I am howev

(313) Da Sampla Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Andrew Duke Cognition Audioworks http://cognitionaudioworks.com
Peteri, Jochem wrote: and that da sampla track is awesome, Shake ain´t it? ***Yes -- Jason Trenholm was born 31 August 1969 and died 1 January 2004. We met when we were 5 years old; he was my best friend for the next 29 years.* Andrew Duke releases out now: Take Nothing For Granted ht

Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Martin Dust
How do you unsubscribe? Hit off list... Martin Dust

Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Kent williams
I guess this is a response to my post about Tortured Soul. Um... first of all, I do use sequencers, and from what I gather so do they when they make tracks. Second of all, what they did last night was something I hadn't ever seen, someone doing music based in DJ Culture, but performed live. This

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Peteri, Jochem
"Sequencers, no sequencers, who gives a f*ck?" That´s basically my point nicely put btw and that da sampla track is awesome, Shake ain´t it? The information contained in this e-mail communication is solely intended for the person/legal person to whom it has been sent, and as it may contai

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Andrew
- From: Peteri, Jochem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2004 11:38 To: robin Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers But a pretty good point though...It is what bugs me about it. It´s not always meant by it but most of the time it seems to be, specially when it´s an act

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Peteri, Jochem
To: 'Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)'; 'Peteri, Jochem'; 313@hyperreal.org -> Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers -> -> -> -> -> -> Or it could be an artists desire to try and create something -> -> different that -> -> doesn't get restrained by certain f

Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Martin Dust
quot;'Peteri, > Jochem'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:05 AM > Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers > > > > > -> Or it could be an artists desire to try and create something > -> different tha

Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread max
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Peteri, Jochem'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:05 AM Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers -> Or it could be

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread robin
;Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)'; 'Peteri, Jochem'; 313@hyperreal.org -> Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers -> -> -> -> -> -> Or it could be an artists desire to try and create something -> -> different that -> -> doesn't get restrained by certain factors? Or

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
Well, you don't know that for certain, it's a very speculative point. -Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2004 11:05 To: 'Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)'; 'Peteri, Jochem'; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread robin
-> Or it could be an artists desire to try and create something -> different that -> doesn't get restrained by certain factors? Or maybe they -> can't afford a -> sequencer? heh yeah right, anyone who's serious about electronic music can afford a sequencer if they really want one (mmt8/atari?

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread iancheshire
d 17/03/2004 10:28 To: 313@hyperreal.org Cc: Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers The point is that if you don´t use a sequencer this is not good or bad. It´s not like fruit where no pesticides is good. It kinda feels like a "look mum I can re

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
ochem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2004 10:28 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers The point is that if you don´t use a sequencer this is not good or bad. It´s not like fruit where no pesticides is good. It kinda feels like a "look mum I can really play"

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Peteri, Jochem
rder to do something and feel good about it. I a shorter form this would make a great T-shirt -Original Message- From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 17 maart 2004 11:19 To: Peteri, Jochem; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) no sequencers Isn't that a little

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Peteri, Jochem
:11 To: Peteri, Jochem; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) no sequencers Nice tone and brilliant sweeping statement, shut the door on your way out fella... 17/3/04 10:13 AM Peteri, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I´m sorry, but if you use no sequencer and think this is something to shout > about i

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread iancheshire
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 17/03/2004 10:11 To: Peteri, Jochem; 313@hyperreal.org Cc: Subject: Re: (313) no sequencers Nice tone and brilliant sweeping statement, shut the door on your way out fella...

RE: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Ken Odeluga
important ones. 'But that's just me.' Ken Odeluga >-Original Message- >From: Peteri, Jochem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 10:13 AM >To: 313@hyperreal.org >Subject: (313) no sequencers > > >I´m sorry, but if you use no sequenc

Re: (313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Martin Dust
Nice tone and brilliant sweeping statement, shut the door on your way out fella... 17/3/04 10:13 AM Peteri, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I´m sorry, but if you use no sequencer and think this is something to shout > about i think your a dickhead > > but that´s just me... > > The information contained i

(313) no sequencers

2004-03-17 Thread Peteri, Jochem
I´m sorry, but if you use no sequencer and think this is something to shout about i think your a dickhead but that´s just me... The information contained in this e-mail communication is solely intended for the person/legal person to whom it has been sent, and as it may contain information of