Thx. The background to what I was saying was meant to be contemporaneous,
i.e. *now*, although I didn't make this explicit (and I should have).
k
Dan Sicko:
>I could be wrong, but I thought from the context that Ken meant "these
>days"
>
>?
>
>On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 04:21 PM, Matthew
I could be wrong, but I thought from the context that Ken meant "these
days"
?
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 04:21 PM, Matthew MacQueen wrote:
It has to be said on the whole also that America is not
the major place for underground movements of any kind.
Avant-garde music ('cause tha
Ken,
I agreed with the part of your post about majority of Americans not accepting
of techno/electronic music (defined in the way most list members would here,
anyway), and Detroit artists disappointed at overall gig and label
opportunities here. But this second part...
> It has to be said on
Part of the reason we appear to be favoured in London (and it's not just
London, there's anecdotal evidence there's a bit of an underground
electronic music 'renaissance' in Europe too) is that the atmosphere for
innovative music, the appreciation - and certainly the sales volumes and
ratios are si
