Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-09 Thread Christian Bloch
even though you use Cubase instead of Acid, you will have to sample the synth lines (if you want it all in the computer anyway) On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Hugh G. Blaze wrote: Basically, if you just want to do simple MIDI sequencing to outboard gear and toss some waves over it, use whatever is

Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-09 Thread lil' robbie
Acid is a toyCubase IS better (vst 2) the MPC is hella cool (tits) but i like the pc (though the Atari WAS moretight) ..christian bloch - mp3.com/bloch ..ive always been told that acid is *not* a sequencer but a multitracker..although im not sure

Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-09 Thread Phonopsia
-Original Message- From: lil' robbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 313@hyperreal.org 313@hyperreal.org Date: Thursday, June 08, 2000 10:00 PM Subject: Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated) Acid is a toyCubase

Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-09 Thread pooper scooper
. Blaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 04:29:01 +0200 (MET DST) even though you use Cubase instead of Acid, you will have to sample the synth lines (if you want it all

re:(OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-09 Thread The Deliverator
'lo all, I recently switched from using opcode studio vision pro (the red-headed step child of sequencing software,) to Digital performer 2.7. I would take a serious look at performer (http://www.motu.com.) It has a very nice interface, very advanced midi functionality, loads of plugins

Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-09 Thread Christian Bloch
] (OT) Software question (revised and updated) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 04:29:01 +0200 (MET DST) even though you use Cubase instead of Acid, you will have to sample the synth lines (if you want it all in the computer anyway) On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Hugh G. Blaze wrote: Basically, if you just

(OT) Software question

2000-06-08 Thread Hugh G. Blaze
I want to sequence wave files (ala sonic foundry's ACID) and midi data at the same time, what software is best suited to the task - cubase, or logic? Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

[313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-08 Thread Hugh G. Blaze
So far the votes are Cubase: 3 (or maybe 4) cakewalk: 2 and logic: 0. My quesiton is:Why? Is cubase that much easier to use than logic? I've heard Logic is quite a bitch. I'll say this much, I thought Acid was pretty much a toy, not that I'm bragging about my abilities, rather speaking to

Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-08 Thread joe
So far the votes are Cubase: 3 (or maybe 4) cakewalk: 2 and logic: 0. My quesiton is:Why? First off: I'd recommend dropping Cakewalk from the race. It's clunkier, the MIDI timing isn't as tight, and it's not as featurely on the audio side (if I remember correctly). Second:

Re: [313] (OT) Software question (revised and updated)

2000-06-08 Thread Hugh G. Blaze
Basically, if you just want to do simple MIDI sequencing to outboard gear and toss some waves over it, use whatever is easiest for you. That's exactly what i want to do. I love acid for it's ease of use but have a compendium of vintage synths that I just can't leave in the closet